Archive for the ‘Democrat’ Category

Limit access to US secret documents, Democrat says in response to leaks – The Guardian US

Pentagon leaks 2023

Chair of Senate intelligence committee addresses Pentagon leaks and says central entity should oversee classification process

Reuters in Washington

Sun 23 Apr 2023 12.45 EDT

Too many people have access to the US governments closest secrets and a central entity should oversee the classification process, the chairman of the Senate intelligence committee said on Sunday, addressing leaks of documents in an online chat group.

A US air national guardsman was charged on 14 April with leaking classified documents on the Discord platform.

It is believed to be the most serious US security breach since more than 700,000 documents, videos and diplomatic cables appeared on the WikiLeaks website in 2010.

On Sunday, Mark Warner, a Democratic senator from Virginia, told ABCs This Week that once we get to that highest level of classification, we maybe have too many folks taking a look at them, over 4 million people with clearances.

The senators powerful position gives weight to his recommendations as Joe Bidens administration examines the handling of intelligence and looks for ways to clamp down on future leaks.

The US has numerous intelligence-gathering entities and Warner said the situation needed to be dealt with.

We need somebody fully in charge of the whole classification process and I think for those classified documents there ought to be a smaller universe, he said.

As an example, Warner said the National Security Agency has suffered leaks in the past notably including the disclosures by Edward Snowden in 2013 and internal controls now limit the copying of documents.

The Pentagon has called the latest leak a deliberate, criminal act.

Warner also said that not everyone handling a document needs to see the whole document and that just seeing the header could be enough.

{{topLeft}}

{{bottomLeft}}

{{topRight}}

{{bottomRight}}

{{.}}

Read the original here:
Limit access to US secret documents, Democrat says in response to leaks - The Guardian US

Democrat Leaders urged to create a Joint Oversight and … – Coos Bay World

Recently, House and Senate Republican and Independent leaders sent a letter to Senate President Rob Wagner and House Speaker Dan Rayfield asking for an equal bipartisan and bicameral Joint Committee on Oversight and Accountability. The letter includes the names of those who would serve as Republican and Independent members of the 12-person equal committee.

The letter reads as follows:

Dear Presiding Officers,

As you may know, House and Senate Republican and Independent leaders sent letters in March and April urging the Governor to launch independent, nonpartisan investigations into the Oregon Liquor and Cannabis Commissions (OLCC) (1) potential favorable treatment of land acquisitions; (2) alleged rare liquor distribution; (3) process of granting retail licenses. In response, the Governor has said that the DOJs investigations will suffice. We disagree.

Today, Oregon House and Senate Republican and Independent leaders are calling on you, as presiding officers, to create an equal bipartisan and bicameral Joint Committee on Oversight and Accountability. Its first order of business should be to seek answers in the alleged actions of the OLCC.

The OLCCs actions have been greatly covered in the news over the past several months, with several allegations leading the public to believe this agency is corrupt. We must resolve these issues with full transparency.

We put forth the following names to serve as Republican and Independent members of the 12-person committee:

Senator Tim Knopp, Senate District 27

Senator Dick Anderson, Senate District 5

Independent Senator Brian Boquist, Senate District 12

Representative Vikki Breese-Iverson, House District 59

Representative Greg Smith, House District 57

Representative E. Werner Reschke, House District 55

We understand that in certain instances, investigations are being conducted by the Department of Justice. This is not sufficient. We must provide the standard of oversight and accountability that our Constitution and the people of Oregon expect. We ask that you take immediate action by creating this committee today.

See original here:
Democrat Leaders urged to create a Joint Oversight and ... - Coos Bay World

For Progressive Democrats, New Momentum Clashes With Old … – The New York Times

Progressive victories in Wisconsin and Chicago have injected new momentum into the most liberal wingof the Democratic Party. Butthose recent electoral successes are masking deeper internal tensions over the role and influence of progressives in a party President Biden has been remaking in his moderate image.

Interviews with more than 25 progressive and moderate Democratic leaders and strategists including current and former members of Congress and directors of national and statewide groups revealed a behind-the-scenes tug of war over the partys policy agenda, messaging and tactics. As the party looks toward next years elections, its key constituencies have undergone a transformation. Once mostly white, working-class voters, Democrats now tend to be affluent, white liberals, Black moderates and a more diverse middle class.

On some fronts, progressives a relatively young, highly educated and mostly white bloc that makes up about 12 percent of the Democratic coalition and is the most politically active have made inroads. Their grass-roots networks, including several headed by Black and Latino leaders, have grown sharply since the heights of the widespread resistance to the Trump administration. Beyond the high-profile victories in Chicago and Wisconsin, they have won under-the-radar local and state races across the country. And many of their views have moved into the mainstream and pushed the government to expand the fight against child poverty, climate change and other social ills.

We as a movement helped articulate these things, to do these things, said Representative Pramila Jayapal, the Washington State Democrat who heads the Congressional Progressive Caucus.

Yet at the same time, the activist left wing remains very much on the defensive.

The negotiations with the White House on some of the most sweeping legislation fell short of the bold, structural change many of their members sought. And progressives remain locked in an old debate with their moderate counterparts as well as themselves over how to communicate progressive ideas and values to voters at a time when slogans like defund the police have come under attack by Republicans and moderate Democrats.

In 2018, our party seemed to react to Donald Trump winning in 2016, and the reaction was to go further and further left, said Cheri Bustos, a former Illinois congresswoman who is a moderate and was a leader of the House Democrats campaign arm. When politics swings far to the left or far to the right, there always seems to be a reckoning.

As Mr. Biden has signaled that he plans to run for re-election in 2024, he has been emphasizing the moderate roots he has embodied throughout much of his roughly 50 years in politics. He has replaced a key ally of the left in the White House Ron Klain, Mr. Bidens former chief of staff with Jeffrey D. Zients, who some progressive groups see as too friendly to corporate interests. And he has been clashing with activists who have accused him of backsliding on his liberal approaches to crime, statehood for the District of Columbia, climate issues and immigration policy.

Progressive is a label that encompasses various factions within the American left and can mean different things to different people. Broadly, progressives tend to believe the government should push for sweeping change to solve problems and address racial and social inequities. Like moderate and establishment Democrats, they support strong economic and social safety net programs and believe the economic system largely favors powerful interests.

But points of tension emerge between moderates and progressives over tactics: Progressives tend to call for ambitious structural overhauls of U.S. laws and institutions that they see as fundamentally racist over incremental change and more measured policy approaches.

In an interview with the socialist political magazine Jacobin, Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York, one of the most prominent progressive Democrats in the House, highlighted the tension by criticizing the president for making a lurch to the right.

I think it is extremely risky and very perilous should the Biden administration forget who it was that put him over the top, she told the magazine, referring to the high turnout in the 2020 presidential election of young people and communities of color.

Ms. Ocasio-Cortez is the rare Democratic member of Congress to publicly criticize the president. Several other progressives said they had accepted their role as having a seat at the table, though not necessarily at the head of it. Some said they believed Mr. Biden would serve as a bridge to new generation of progressive leaders, even if for now they are caught in a waiting game.

Right now, the progressives are sort of building power it is like a silent build that is just going to explode in a post-Biden world, said Representative Ro Khanna of California, a co-chairman of Senator Bernie Sanderss 2020 presidential campaign. I just cant conceive of a situation where progressives arent dominating presidential elections over the next 15 years after Biden.

The victories in Wisconsin and Chicago followed a similar playbook: Thousands of volunteers knocked on doors, made calls, wrote postcards, fired off mass texts and canvassed college campuses. They shied away from slogans and divisions among Democrats and emphasized the threat of an anti-democratic, Trumpian movement on the right. They turned out diverse coalitions of voters.

In Chicago that allowed progressives to propel Brandon Johnson, a once little-known county commissioner and union organizer, to clinch a narrow victory in the mayors race over his more conservative Democratic opponent, Paul Vallas, who ran on a tough-on-crime platform and was endorsed by a police union. In Wisconsin, where Janet Protasiewicz, a liberal Milwaukee County judge, won a high-stakes race for a seat on the states Supreme Court, it allowed Democrats to lean into issues that the establishment wing of the party once tended to avoid in Republican and heavily contested areas: increased access to abortion and collective bargaining rights.

I couldnt feel more proud or feel more vindicated that the type of politics we argued for are where more Americans are at, said Maurice Mitchell, national director of the Working Families Party, a grass-roots organization that often works with progressive Democrats and mobilized voters in Chicago and Wisconsin.

Progressives have also been increasing their ranks in other places. Members of their wing now hold the mayors office in Los Angeles and a majority on the board of aldermen in St. Louis. They have swept into statehouses in Colorado, Connecticut and Wisconsin, where two Democratic Socialists this year revived a socialist caucus inactive since the 1930s. At the federal level, the Houses Congressional Progressive Caucus added 16 new members, bringing the total number of the organization to 102 one of the largest ideological caucuses in Congress.

But as they build their organizing power, progressives are contending with a financial framework at the mercy of boom-and-bust cycles. Major gifts from donors or progressive attention to a cause du jour can draw sudden revenue windfalls and then dry out. In the Trump years, some grass-roots groups had explosive growth as progressives rushed to combat Trump policies, elevate a younger and more diverse crop of candidates and help fuel a national reckoning with racism. By the 2022 midterms, some progressive candidates and groups were having to rewrite budgets, considering laying off staff members and triaging outreach programs and advertising as donations slowed.

In Georgia, the Asian American Advocacy Fund, which focuses on mobilizing Asian American voters, went from having six full-time employees and a budget of roughly $95,000 in 2018 to a staff of 14 and a budget of $3 million in 2022. Its executive director, Aisha Yaqoob Mahmood, said the boom allowed the group to run better programs but also made those projects harder to sustain when donations ran low. The group was among several in swing states that struggled in 2022 to get political canvassing efforts off the ground as major Democratic donors cut back on their political giving.

We lost momentum, and we lost the vast majority of people who tuned into politics and tuned into elections, many maybe for the first time in their lives, because there was this villain who needed to be defeated, Mrs. Yaqoob Mahmood said.

Political analysts also warned against reading too much into progressive gains in areas that already lean liberal. During the midterms, the candidates who won tough midterm contests in purple places like Pennsylvania, Arizona, Georgia and Nevada largely adopted more moderate positions. And more progressive nominees who beat moderates in a number of House primaries lost in the general election.

The whole name of the game is creating a majority, and the majority makers are the moderates, said Matt Bennett, a co-founder of Third Way, a centrist organization. Referring to progressives, he said: They can win occasionally. But for the most part, they lose because what theyre selling isnt what Dems want to be buying.

As Mr. Trump vies for the 2024 Republican presidential nomination, with multiple investigations hanging over his campaign, both moderate and progressive Democrats said they were forming a united front against a common foil and on issues where there is less division within their party, like abortion and protecting democracy. But for progressives, that has still meant a delicate dance about who they are.

In Pennsylvania, John Fetterman, successfully campaigning for Senate last year, argued that he was not a progressive but just a Democrat. In Virginia, Jennifer McClellan, who became the first Black woman to represent the state in Congress, has called herself a pragmatic progressive, emphasizing her decades of working across the aisle.

The stakes are especially high for progressives in Arizona, where a fierce race is expected over Senator Kyrsten Sinemas seat, after she left the Democratic Party in December to become an independent. Ms. Sinema flipped a Republican-held seat by hewing to the center and relying on progressive groups that turned out a large coalition of Democratic and independent voters.

Now, Representative Ruben Gallego of Phoenix, a member of the progressive congressional caucus, is running for the seat.

In some ways, Mr. Gallego is a bona fide progressive. He has been promoting policies like expanding affordable health care, enacting a permanent child tax credit and increasing wages. In other ways, he is reluctant to openly embrace the progressive brand, preferring instead to talk about his vision for Arizona or his experience as a Marine combat veteran and former construction worker as a way to help bring those working-class Latinos who now vote Republican back into the Democratic fold.

Asked if he sees himself as a progressive, Mr. Gallego said, I see myself as someone who has been a worker and a fighter for working-class families. He added, We are not going to be focusing on D.C. labels.

Susan Campbell Beachy contributed research.

Visit link:
For Progressive Democrats, New Momentum Clashes With Old ... - The New York Times

The useful veneer of the aging Democrat | Government/Opinion – City-sentinel

President Joe Biden is now 80 years old. He will be 82 when he campaigns for the 2024 presidency and a clearly debilitated 86 should he be elected and fill out his second term. He has been in government for over a half-century.

Former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and current representative from California is 83.

Rep. Steny Hoyer, D-Md., the second-ranking Democratic House member behind Pelosi, was House majority leader until early this year. He is 83, and has been an elected official for nearly 60 years.

Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., is 72, with 48 years in elected government.

Democratic luminary and former chairman of the Senate Judiciary and Intelligence Committees, Senator Diane Feinstein, D-Calif., is 89, and ailing after 53 years as an elected official.

James Clyburn, D-S.C., is House minority whip and 82.

These are the official faces of the Democratic Party.

They came into power and maturity three decades ago during the Clinton years of 1993-1999.

Decades ago, they sometimes supported strong national defense, secure borders, gas and oil development, fully funding the police, and a few restrictions on partial-birth abortions.

Not now.

Their role has changed from that of liberals of the Clinton era to serving as the thin power-holding veneer that masks the new real Democratic Party.

The party has been changed beyond recognition by Senators Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., the so-called Squad, the Congressional Black Caucus, newly elected senators like the Georgia duo of Jon Ossoff and Raphael Warnock and Antifa and Black Lives Matter.

Yet Biden and company are still familiar American faces.

Their final role is to acculturate the electorate to the new Democratic Party.

Its radicals are breathing down their necks to get out of the way. Yet for a while longer they still need such an ossified veneer of respectability to ease the transition to what is now essentially a socialist-European green party.

This new Democratic Party believes in defunding the police.

It supports the George-Soros-funded state and city district attorneys.

These prosecutors seek either to release violent criminals without bail or reduce their felonies to misdemeanors.

Critical legal and race theories are their creeds. So they argue that crimes have little to do with individual free will.

Criminals are not deterred by tough enforcement of the laws. Instead, crime reflects arbitrary constructs of a racially oppressive hierarchy.

They believe the woke revolution of using race and gender in lieu of a meritocracy should dominate government and corporate boardrooms.

Racial separation in graduations, dorms, and university programs are needed reparations.

Big Tech is their ally. All the better when it partners with government, especially the FBI and CIA, to suppress misinformation and disinformation.

They believe gender is socially constructed. Thus transitioning biological males can and should compete in womens sports.

They want a Green New Deal right now, one that calls for the abolition of natural gas and oil for electricity generation and transportation.

Abortion is seen as a God-given right even as a baby passes through the birth canal.

Climate change is their religion, trumping any concern for the viability of the middle-class suffering from inflation, high interest rates, and recession.

They want semiautomatic rifles to be banned. Concealed handgun permits should be almost impossible to obtain.

The more voters skip Election Day through mail-in balloting and early voting, the better.

There is no longer dark money, only useful correct money.

The more that Silicon Valley and Wall Street grandees quietly reroute hundreds of millions of dollars into hard-Left PACs and nonpartisan causes, the more the donors should expect lucrative crony-capitalist green deals and government concessions.

Much of the ideology of the new Democratic Party arose in academia, like critical race theory and modern monetary theory. The giveaway word is theory a mask for any absurd doctrine that can be dressed up as a sophisticated new idea.

When Rep. Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., the new Democratic minority leader in the House or Elizabeth Warren in the Senate advocate these positions, the voters recoil. That pushback is understandable, since almost none of these notions poll above 50 percent.

The role of a calcified Biden, Pelosi, Feinstein, Hoyer, or Clyburn is to reassure voters through their notoriety and apparently staid exteriors that they are hardly the sort to embrace revolution, although that is exactly what they do.

Ol Joe Bidens old guard and the new hard Left play a game of mutual advantage.

The new majority of radical Democrats allows the old fogies to bask in the limelight until they drop exempt from counter-revolutionary criticism or inter-party primary challenges or demands to retire.

In return, the codgers reassure the nation that old faces like theirs cannot possibly be polyester revolutionary socialists despite their role in airbrushing and photoshopping the radical catastrophe unfolding before our eyes.

---------

ABOUT THE WRITER

---------

(Victor Davis Hanson is a distinguished fellow of the Center for American Greatness. He is a classicist and historian at the Hoover Institution, Stanford University, and the author of The Second World Wars: How the First Global Conflict Was Fought and Won, from Basic Books. You can reach him by e-mailing authorvdh@gmail.com.)

Read more:
The useful veneer of the aging Democrat | Government/Opinion - City-sentinel

Former Albany Democrat Matthew Clyne challenging petitions – Times Union

ALBANY At first glance, the challenges filed earlier this month to the petitions for two Democratic candidates for the Albany County Legislature to get on Novembers ballot appear run of the mill.

Whats noticeable is the name behind those challenges.

The attorney working on behalf of the two Republican and Conservative candidates trying to get their opponents knocked off the ballot is Matthew Clyne, the former Democratic commissioner for the Albany County Board of Elections. Clyne, who did not seek another term as commissioner after a 2020 dispute over wearing masks in the Board of Elections building, later enrolled in the countys Conservative Party.

Clyne, who also once led the town of Bethlehem Democratic committee, was a powerhouse in county politics for years and is considered one of the foremost state election law experts in the county. Since leaving his county positionshe has worked for politicians on both sides of the aisle.

He did not return a call for comment.

The lawsuits challenge the petitions filed by Herbert Joseph, of Rensselaerville, who is seeking to represent parts of southern Albany County that includes much of theHilltowns, and Ansel Asch, who is running in Colonie.

Both are challenging sitting legislators, Christopher Smith in the Hilltowns and Jennifer Whalenin Colonie. Smith is seeking his third term and Whalen is seeking her second. All 39 of the County Legislatures seats are up for election this year.

Whalens challenge to her opponents petitions alleges that in his initial filing on April 3 with the county Board of Elections, Aschs petition did not have the required number of properly filled out signatures. Asch filed a second set of signatures several days later as part of a Volume 2 that included two cover sheets.

On Friday, Whalen said Aschs petitions were, defective and sloppy.

We cant have people that are sloppy representing the people of the 21st district, she said.

Ryan Horstmyer, the chair of the Colonie Democratic committee, said he believed Whalens challenge to Aschs petitions would fail and that there is nothing in the states election law that prohibits filing petitions on different days.

We know we got more than the minimum number of clean signatures that have no issues, he said.

Smith, who ran as a Democrat and Conservative in 2019, is running on the Republican and Conservative party lines this fall. He could not be reached for comment.

Smiths challenge to Herberts petition is focused on a different issue, arguing that his petition doesnt meet the requirements for a designating petition and relies on conflicting witness statements.

Specifically, Herberts petition includes signed statements from a witness as well as a notary public, but on at least two sheets, the number of signatures that the two attest to do not match.

These discrepancies cast into doubt the validity of all the signatures on the petition, Clyne wrote.

Joseph disputed that that his petition was faulty.

I collected more signatures than I needed, he said. Hes objecting because what, for the first time in eight years, he actually has some competition?

The two challenges are scheduled for hearings in Albany County Supreme Court early this week.

Read the original post:
Former Albany Democrat Matthew Clyne challenging petitions - Times Union