Archive for the ‘Democracy’ Category

Bestsellers: ‘This Other Eden,’ ‘Democracy Awakening’ – Press Herald

FICTION

Hardcover

1. This Other Eden, by Paul Harding (W.W. Norton) 2. Lessons in Chemistry, by Bonnie Garmus (Doubleday) 3. Demon Copperhead, by Barbara Kingsolver (Harper) 4. Somebodys Fool, by Richard Russo (Knopf) 5. The Heaven & Earth Grocery Store, by James McBride (Riverhead) 6. The Skull, by Jon Klassen (Candlewick) 7. Blueberries for Sal, by Robert McCloskey (Viking) 8. Tomorrow, and Tomorrow, and Tomorrow, by Gabrielle Zevin (Knopf) 9. Rouge, by Mona Awad (Simon & Schuster) 10. The Maniac, by Benjamin Labatut (Penguin)

Paperback

1. Night of the Living Rez, by Morgan Talty (Tin House) 2. The Midcoast, by Adam White (Hogarth) 3. Let the Woods Keep Our Bodies, by E.M. Roy (Ghoulish) 4. Big Swiss, by Jen Beagin (Scribner) 5. The Secret History, by Donna Tartt (Vintage) 6. The Thursday Murder Club, by Richard Osman (Penguin) 7. Lucy by the Sea, by Elizabeth Strout (Random House) 8. The Guest List, by Lucy Foley (William Morrow) 9. Everyone Knows Your Mother Is a Witch, by Rivka Galchen (Picador) 10. Bunny, by Mona Awad (Penguin)

NONFICTION

Hardcover

1. Democracy Awakening, by Heather Cox Richardson (Viking) 2. The Creative Act, by Rick Rubin (Penguin) 3. Going Infinite, by Michael Lewis (W. W. Norton) 4. Of Time and Turtles, by Sy Montgomery (Mariner) 5. The Wager, by David Grann (Doubleday) 6. Brave the Wild River, by Melissa L. Sevigny (W.W. Norton) 7. Building, by Mark Ellison (Random House) 8. Raw Dog, by Jamie Loftus (Forge) 9. Wintering, by Katherine May (Riverhead) 10. Mother Tongue, by Jenni Nuttall (Viking)

Paperback

1. Killers of the Flower Moon, by David Grann (Vintage) 2. Several Short Sentences about Writing, by Verlyn Klinkenborg (Vintage) 3. Four Thousand Weeks, by Oliver Burkeman (Picador) 4. The Lobster Coast, by Colin Woodard (Penguin) 5. Indigenous Continent, by Pekka Hmlinen (Liveright) 6. Northeaster, by Cathie Pelletier (Pegasus) 7. Walking Through History, by Paul J. Ledman (Next Steps) 8. When We Were the Kennedys, by Monica Wood (Mariner) 9. Where the Deer and the Antelope Play, by Nick Offerman (Dutton) 10. Mother Brain, by Chelsea Conaboy (Holt McDougal)

Longfellow Books, Portland

Invalid username/password.

Please check your email to confirm and complete your registration.

Use the form below to reset your password. When you've submitted your account email, we will send an email with a reset code.

Previous

Read more here:
Bestsellers: 'This Other Eden,' 'Democracy Awakening' - Press Herald

Vote NOW to Protect Democracy | News, Sports, Jobs – The Express – Lock Haven Express

Diane Ebken

Port Matilda

This years off-year election has huge implications for our community and the 2024 national election. Its essential to vote now!

Three key races will determine access in future elections, reproductive rights, educational integrity and the overall quality of our lives.

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court determines the interpretation of state laws. Justices have the last word on many legal questions from election policy to abortion. The Democratic candidate for Supreme Court Justice, Dan McCaffery, is endorsed by Planned Parenthood and labor unions and stands up for values shared by Democrats. In contrast, the Republican candidate is endorsed by organizations opposing abortion access, and said that no-excuse mail ballots are very bad for our commonwealth.

Centre County Commissioners determine many aspects of daily life. Mark Higgins and Amber Concepcion have worked hard and successfully to serve us, and should continue as Commissioners. They are responsible for ensuring election integrity and are committed to accurate vote counting and broad participation, including access to ballot drop boxes (in contrast to their opponents). They work tirelessly for mental health services, affordable housing, economic development, broadband services and sustainable energy initiatives.

The State College School Board determines educational opportunities and resources. Slate for State candidates Bader, Brandt, Demo, Kolbe and Miller prioritize academic success for all, trust, transparency and fiscal stewardship. Their opponents, supported by Moms for Liberty, are focused on banning books.

Dont take anything for granted. Vote on Nov. 7 for candidates who will preserve Democratic values.

Today's breaking news and more in your inbox

See the original post here:
Vote NOW to Protect Democracy | News, Sports, Jobs - The Express - Lock Haven Express

Political Repression in Georgia: What Funders Can Do to Protect … – Nonprofit Quarterly

Image credit: Photo by Thirdman onpexels.com

The challenges to the already precarious state of our democracy continue. Georgia Attorney General Chris Carr resorted to extreme measures of political repression in September, targeting 61 activists and organizers of the Stop Cop City Movement with Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) indictments.

The ongoing attacks on organizers in Georgia are part of a concerted effort to suppress community voices and the right to protest. This is a critical time for philanthropy to stand with movements and protect democracy.

This move is an abuse of power. The indictments undermine the freedom of organizations and attack the driving principles of social movements such as collectivism and solidarity. These approaches to power building are rooted in love and community care, which have long been a lifeline for those most impacted by unjust systems.

As we shared in June, the ongoing attacks on organizers in Georgia are part of a concerted effort to suppress community voices and the right to protest. This is a critical time for philanthropy to stand with movements and protect democracy.

Carrs RICO indictmentsalong with money laundering charges for three bail fund organizers and domestic terrorism charges for five othersare a direct assault on the foundational principles of our democracywith the goal of eroding public and philanthropic trust in critical social movements.

In the indictments, Attorney General Carr twists RICO statutes created in the 1970s to more easily target the Mafia by tying together apparently unrelated crimes with a common objective into a prosecutable pattern of racketeering. Members of the Stop Cop City movement are accused of being part of a vast criminal conspiracy whose actions, such as distributing flyers in a grocery store parking lot, attending a concert in the park, or participating in mutual aid programs, are, as the indictments put it, overt acts in furtherance of the racketeering conspiracy.

With the push for this indictment, Carr conflates dissent against the state as violence toward the statean egregious overreach. The use of RICO indictments as a tool to stifle dissent is not just a violation of Constitutional rights, such as the freedom of speech, the freedom to assemble, and the right to petition the government for a redress of grievances. It is also meant to have a chilling effect on everyone who works toward justiceincluding you.

Chris Carr wants you to think twice before you attend a protest, join a meeting of like-minded individuals, or contribute to causes you believe in. He isnt alone in this endeavor, either. This is part of a disturbing trend among law enforcement, reactionary prosecutors, and far-right politicians. But the RICO indictments and similar suppression efforts began not with the protests of Cop City in 2021, but rather on May 25, 2020the day George Floyd was killed by police and the largest protests in the nations history began.

After the murder of George Floyd, the FBI and local prosecutors in Phoenix attempted to define the protests as gang activity. In 2021, Ron DeSantis championed HB 1, an anti-riot law in Florida that allows for bystanders to be prosecuted for acts of property destruction. A federal district judge has temporarily blocked this part of the law.

Subscribe to NPQ's newsletters to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

By signing up, you agree to our privacy policy and terms of use, and to receive messages from NPQ and our partners.

Other influential ultraconservative voices applaud Carrs actions as a blueprint for suppressing movements advocating for change across the country. But it is not just conservatives obstructing core principles of democracy. The Democratic mayor of Atlanta, Andre Dickensa strong supporter of Cop Cityhas been emboldened by the Republican attorney generals actions and has refused to count and verify the more than 116,000 signatures collected by Stop Cop City organizers in a referendum that would put the issue on the ballot for Atlanta voters in 2024.

When the engine of our democracy fails, there will be no one left to bend the long arc of history toward justice.

This effort to silence protestors and attack democratic principles is a threat to all of us, no matter our area of focus: climate, economic, health, or racial justice. If attempts by Carr and others are successful, then our social movements grind to a halt. And when the engine of our democracy fails, there will be no one left to bend the long arc of history toward justice.

As the growing shadows of authoritarian oppression loom large, we are compelled to confront the ominous, mounting threats against democracy in this country and take a stand now. Time and again, we ask ourselves: What can we as advocates for justice and democracy do in the face of such alarming developments?

The answers are clear.

In the face of adversity, our commitment to justice and democracy must be unwavering. There is no turning back; the only way is forward.

We call upon all concerned philanthropists and advocates to stand with us in defending the principles that define our great nation. Together, we can ensure that justice prevails and that democracy remains a beacon of hope for generations to come.

Continue reading here:
Political Repression in Georgia: What Funders Can Do to Protect ... - Nonprofit Quarterly

In Person or Online? Researchers Find People’s Stated Support for … – Georgia State University News

ATLANTAAmericans may be less satisfied with U.S. democracy than previously thought and new survey methods may have something to do with that disconnect, according to researchers at Georgia State University.

Judd Thornton, an associate professor in the Department of Political Science, recently conducted a study using American National Election Studies data from 2012 and 2016 to gauge how satisfied U.S. citizens are with American democracy, and how much that sentiment may be influenced by how they were surveyed.

The basic idea was that when people are by themselves, answering questions over the internet, they could be a little more truthful, Thornton said. Theres some idea that liking democracy is good, so you dont tell someone whos knocking on your door that you arent satisfied with it.

This study is a continuation of work on a theory first put forward in the 1940s that now has a lot of literature to back it up.

Thorntons study, Survey Mode and Satisfaction With Democracy, found there was a 20 percent decline in reported satisfaction with democracy when comparing the results from the 2012 and 2016 surveys.

According to the article, 65 percent of respondents in 2012 were interviewed online, while 71 percent had been interviewed online in 2016. In the years prior to 2012, the interviews were conducted almost entirely face to face, with a small percentage over the phone.

The optimistic take is that some of the documented decline in positive attitudes is actually a function of switching over to interviewing by the internet, he said. I think through 2010 or so, were probably overestimating satisfaction levels.

The person-to-person nature of surveys before 2010 most likely caused more people to report that they were happy with American democracy than actually were, he said.

Thorton and his fellow researcher, Georgia State political science Ph.D. student Hamad Ejaz, also looked at results from the 2020 survey, which reported even lower satisfaction than 2016.

Survey mode doesnt account for all of the decline though, so there is a genuine decline in warmth for democracy, but this is a specific incident in this long-standing theory about survey method, Thornton said.

He also noted this decrease in reported satisfaction in democracy is part of a global trend.

Political scientists have spent a lot of energy over the last 20 years documenting attitudes about democracy, especially as democracies are on the retreat in certain parts of the world, Thornton said.

In the U.S. specifically, citizens may just be tired of political polarization, which is the focus of the next study Thornton is working on.

The public just doesnt want every election to feel like this existential choice, he said.

By Katherine Duplessis

Original post:
In Person or Online? Researchers Find People's Stated Support for ... - Georgia State University News

Pita blames concentration of power and wealth for decline of … – Nation Thailand

Pita suggested that countries should not focus only on profitability, but their interest should also be extended to the environment, land rights, land ownership redistribution, and building a social welfare state that takes care of labour empowerment.

That's almost like social democracy to us. It doesn't matter if you agree or disagree. But it's about really coming together to really think about how we create this architecture of how we proceed forward, he said.

Pita, who is now the chief adviser to the new Move Forward leader, added that whenever he and his party can change Thailand through demilitarisation and decentralisation, they would start thinking about foreign policy and look outward to the world.

His message to the world would be Thailand is back. Thailand means business.

He pointed out that the kingdom is a middle power that is the second largest country in Asean, a region that has a combined population of 670 million people and a total GDP of US$6 trillion. You cannot ignore us, he said.

Pita also said that amidst many ongoing conflicts around the world, Thailand really needs to look outward to make sure that you know we are part of the international community.

He suggested that Thailand should join other Asean founding members in telling the world that right makes might and might doesn't make right.

He suggested a review of Thailands foreign policy after 10 years under what he called military rule.

We want to be able to rebalance once again. Its not about taking sides, it's about sticking to principles. We want to be able to criticise our friends and talk to our foes, he said.

Under General Prayut Chan-o-chas government, Thailand adopted neutrality in its foreign policy in international conflicts backed by worlds powers.

Read the original:
Pita blames concentration of power and wealth for decline of ... - Nation Thailand