Archive for the ‘Democracy’ Category

Minnesota House of Representatives passes the Democracy for the … – KSTP

Tonight, the Minnesota House of Representatives passed theDemocracy for the People Act, according to an official release.

The legislation protects the freedom to vote, reduces the influence of dark money and foreign influence in Minnesota politics and ensures fair and inclusive democracy for all Minnesotans, the news release said.

The act also creates automatic voter registration and allows 16- and 17-year-olds to pre-register to vote. The bill also allows all Minnesota voters to choose to vote by mail on a permanent absentee ballot list.

Additionally, the bill would create penalties for spreading false information about voting 60 days before an election and protect voters and election officials from harassment. An individual convicted of interfering with a person registering to vote or casting a ballot could face a gross misdemeanor or be sued.

This is a critical moment for our democracy,said Representative Emma Greenman (DFL Minneapolis), the author of the bill. We know that solving our most significant challenges requires all of us to come together and build a democracy that centers the voices of all Minnesotans. Minnesotans gave us a mandate to act with urgency to protect and strengthen our democracy, and that is what this legislation does. In the North Star State, we are showing the country what a strong, inclusive, multi-racial democracy looks like.

The bill also removes language barriers by requiring voting instructions and ballots to be provided in non-English languages.

The legislation aims to close dark money loopholes and increase transparency of who is contributing to Minnesota elections. It also prohibits foreign-influence corporations from making direct contributions to candidates or political parties.

Our democracy works best when all Minnesotans have the opportunity to participate and make their voices heard, said Speaker Melissa Hortman. Minnesotans want to ensure that voters always will have the biggest say in the decisions that will impact their lives. Our legislation will strengthen the freedom to vote, protect our democratic institutions and Minnesota voters, and empower voters, not corporations or wealthy special interests in our elections.

More information about the Democracy for the People Act is available here. Video of the debate and vote can be found on the House Public Information page.

Originally posted here:
Minnesota House of Representatives passes the Democracy for the ... - KSTP

Democracy School Applications Open Through – New Haven Independent

Looking for acrash course in how New Haven city governmentworks?

Theres aschool for thatDemocracy School, that is, which is now accepting applications through Friday for anew 30-studentcohort.

Click here, here, and here or see below for more information on how to apply to the City Hall-run program, which features weekly presentations by city department heads and civic leaders about the ins and outs of municipalgovernment.

Yours truly went through the program back in 2017 and learned alot. And then wrote about it here. My colleague Laura Glesby wrote about her more recent experience sitting through the then-online-only version of Democracy School last yearhere.

The Democracy School is agreat opportunity for New Haven residents to learn more about how their city government works, to engage with city officials and civic leaders on some of the key issues and challenges facing our communities, and to become more equipped and empowered to get involved in civic life and government, Mayor Elicker said in astatement sent along to the Independent encouraging New Haveners toapply.

Ultimately, New Haven is astronger city when more of our residents are actively engaged and involved in helping to move our city forward. The Democracy School is agreat place tostart.

Here is the original post:
Democracy School Applications Open Through - New Haven Independent

‘It’s dictated by us’: Strengthening Democracy Awards 2023 – Civic Nebraska

It was a night we wont soon forget.

On April 13, we gathered in Omaha to celebrate Nebraskans daily acts to strengthen democracy. More than 200 friends, both old and new, joined us at the Livestock Exchange Ballrooms for an event that was as festive and rousing as it was inspiring and poignant. We witnessed the genuine affection for the honorees from those who nominated them, we saw overflowing gratitude from our winners, and we heard a powerful call to lead from Nobel nominee Desmond Meade, the evenings keynote speaker.

Among his comments was a stirring reminder that civic power is free. It doesnt require money, status, or fame, Meade said:

You dont have to be an athlete. You dont have to be a movie star. You dont have to be a billionaire to have an impact not only in your community but in your state and in the world, said Meade, who told a story of how he rose from a troubled past to lead the largest restoration of voting rights in a half-century in the United States.

Each and every one of us can impact our world in a profound way. The spirit of our democracy, the vibrancy of our democracy, and the existence of our democracy are not dictated by any elected official. Its dictated by us, the constituents who are willing to go through anything it takes to preserve this democracy of ours.

Did you miss the gathering or want to experience it again? Heres the full ceremony (below), which featured heartfelt introductions of our winners Eric Garcia-Mendez, Rick Galusha, Cheyenne Hartshorn, Kendall Bartling, and Joseline Reyna by those who nominated them for a Strengthening Democracy Award, as well as comments from the honorees.

See more here:
'It's dictated by us': Strengthening Democracy Awards 2023 - Civic Nebraska

Reported plan to curb ministry legal advisers would crush democracy, says ex-AG – The Times of Israel

Former attorney general Avichai Mandelblit, a vocal critic of the governments ongoing effort to radically overhaul the judiciary, railed on Monday against a reported coalition plan to soon advance a key, divisive bill in the legislative package once the Knesset reconvenes for its summer session at the end of the month.

In an interview with Channel 12, Mandelblit said the hardline coalitions bill to severely limit the power of ministry legal counsels would crush the first line of defense for Israeli democracy.

The duty of the public service legal advisers is first and foremost to the State of Israel and not personally to the minister, Mandelblit said, arguing that the reported legislation would erode the advisers ability to act as a gatekeeper and prevent illegal acts from being committed.

Mandelblit, who was appointed by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu before going on to file a criminal indictment against the premier, has repeatedly slammed the Netanyahu governments broader judicial overhaul and has said if the proposed plans pass into law, Israel will cease being a democracy.

According to a Channel 12 report on Sunday, the coalition intends to soon put forth the most extreme version of the legal counsel bill, which would transform legal advisers and their positions from professional authorities to discretionary positions. The bill would enable ministers to appoint and fire their own legal advisers, and also to make legal counsels positions non-binding on ministers and the cabinet.

Currently, each ministrys legal counsel falls under the aegis of the attorney general, to preserve their independence from political influence, and their positions are binding upon ministries. Proponents of the overhaul frequently chafe at the intervention of the attorney general and ministerial legal counsels, whom they say argue too easily and frequently override the policy initiatives of elected ministers since their written positions are binding on the government.

Then-prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu and then-newly appointed cabinet secretary Avichai Mandelblit attend the weekly cabinet meeting at the Prime Ministers Office in Jerusalem on June 9, 2013. (Marc Israel Sellem/POOL/FLASH90)

Critics of the governments proposals for remaking the judicial system have warned that curbing the independence of ministry legal counsels would undercut an important check on executive power.

The Sunday report said the coalition would seek to pass this legislation regardless of current, ongoing negotiations with the opposition in a bid to reach a compromise on the judicial shake-up. Netanyahu paused the legislation late last month to allow for dialogue on the proposals but coalition members have indicated their determination to see the judicial overhaul through, despite the compromise talks.

The TV report noted that the legislation, if passed, would allow Netanyahu to remove the legal adviser at the Prime Ministers Office, Shlomit Barnea Farago, who he has clashed with overspending and the return of state gifts.

In his Monday interview, Mandelblit explained that there were previous iterations of this specific bill that were fended off. He said one version of the extreme bill from about five years ago drew intervention from former chief justices Aharon Barak, Elyakim Rubinstein, and Meir Shamgar, who came to the Knesset in order to fight the bill, a period of time Mandelblit referred to as a defining event during his tenure as attorney general.

Mandelblit also referred to a previous private bill by Likuds Amir Ohana, currently the Knesset speaker, that wouldve mandated a ministry legal adviser to act to implement [a] ministers instructions and would obligate the adviser to fulfill their basic duty of safeguarding and protecting the interests of the state. Another proposal, by former justice minister Ayelet Shaked, which Mandeblidt described as completely different but also not necessarily good, would have given more weight to the political echelon, while protections wouldve remained in place. It too did not move forward.

The bill in its current form, warned Mandelblit, will all but incline ministry legal advisers to be personally loyal to the ministers whom they serve and the counsels would not be required to report any dubious activity to the attorney general.

The current proposals could lead to serious malfunctions, he said, since 80 or 90 percent of the decisions are made at the ministry level and not at the government level. As long as [the legal adviser] doesnt warn [the attorney general] about [seemingly illicit] conduct, no one will even know that something illegal is taking place.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, left, with Justice Minister Yariv Levin in the Knesset on March 27, 2023. (Yonatan Sindel/Flash90)

According to the coalitions yet-to-be-publicized proposal, if a legal advisor alerts the attorney general of suspected wrongdoing, the minister will simply fire [them]. This is what is going to happen, and it is something that greatly endangers the rule of law in the State of Israel and the protection of the stateas a liberal democracy.

Such conduct would allow for a situation where there would no longer [be] a [set] term for a legal adviser. [They] will be appointed for an indefinite period of time, and as soon as the minister changes, the legal adviser will also change.

The levels of protection of democracy in the State of Israel are not among the best [as is]. We dont have a constitution, we dont have two houses of parliament, we dont have a federal and regional system of government, explained Mandelblit. In the eyes of the states founders, the two lines of defense were the Attorney Generals Office and the High Court of Justice.

Mandelblit said the legal counsel bill is no less dangerous than efforts to curb the powers of the court and bring most judicial appointments under political control.

It is possible that to a large extent, it is more serious because most cases do not reach the Supreme Court but are closed within the government ministries. If legal advisors arent able to act independently, it endangers the rule of law along with liberal, democratic values.

Attorney General Gali Baharav-Miara has warned that the coalitions current package of legislation would hand the government virtually unrestrained power, without providing any institutional protections for individual rights.

The plans have drawn intense public criticism and sparked massive protests for the past 15 weeks since their unveiling.

Follow this link:
Reported plan to curb ministry legal advisers would crush democracy, says ex-AG - The Times of Israel

Subversion of democracy in Adamawa – TheCable

What played out last weekend in Adamawa State during the supplementary gubernatorial poll can best be described as attempts by desperate politicians to subvert democracy and undermine the will of the people. The electoral heist must be totally condemned in all its ramifications.

In the show of shame in broad daylight, the whole world was shocked to see the Resident Electoral Commissioner (REC), Hudu Yunusa-Ari, on television illegally announcing Senator Aishat Binani Dahiru, the candidate of the All Progressives Congress (APC), as the winner of the election when results from 10 local councils were still being expected. How low can we get?

The electoral law does not recognise RECs to collate and announce election results in the states; that is the job of the Returning Officer. So, what Yunusa-Ari did was brazen, illegal and it could only have been inspired by an animal boldness of the worst kind.

Instead of the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) summoning Yunusa-Ari to Abuja, he should have been arrested in Yola immediately and made to face the full wrath of the law. What happened next is even more shocking: Senator BInani, whom Yunusa-Ari declared illegally as the winner, read an acceptance speech, thanking the people of Adamawa State for electing her.

That was a lie from the pit of hell; she was not elected because she did not win the election. Binani is desperate to set a record as the first female governor in Nigeria but she has to be properly elected not through the backdoor, subterfuge or illegality.

We may have seen bad behaviours displayed by politicians in the past but what Senator Binani and her enablers did at a time we are trying to improve on the electoral process takes the cake. How far will politicians go in the theatre of the absurd?

On top of this travesty and brazen shenanigan, Binani approached a High Court in Abuja, seeking a judicial review in an attempt to stop INEC from voiding her illegal declaration as the winner of the governorship poll as announced by Yunusa-Ari.

I have never seen anything like this before. If we truly want to be honest with ourselves, politicians are the biggest threats to our democracy.

What the Adamawa REC and Binani have done should come with consequences; otherwise it will become a standard playbook for other politicians who do not have any sense of shame or higher purpose.

Because of Yunusa-Aris egregious conduct, another national commissioner deployed to Adamawa for the supplementary poll, was beaten black and blue and then stripped naked. It was clearly a case of the anger of the mob.

Yunusa-Ari appeared defiant on the day he made the illegal announcement in the presence of security personnel. He was confronted by onlookers in the room that he had no powers to announce the winner. He was also reminded that it was the holy month of Ramadan the ninth month of the Muslim year, during which strict fasting, prayer and deep reflections are observed from dawn to sunset.

In his desperation, the Adamawa REC who has now been disowned by INEC set aside all the entreaties and spiritual injunctions. There must have been something in it for him to have taken such risk for a zero-sum game.

Before the supplementary governorship elections in Kebbi and Adamawa States, INEC had been in the eye of the storm. The reputation of the electoral umpire had taken severe beating arising from the previous elections in February and March.

INEC had the opportunity to redeem its image but, apparently, the likes of Yunusa-Ari with his gang of co-conspirators had other plans. There was now palpable tension in Adamawa State which could have led to a breakdown of law and order.

As it turned out, INEC worked very hard to do damage control. Last Sunday, the electoral body announced that the REC illegally announced the winner which was declared null and void.

In order to calm frayed nerves, INEC suspended the collation of results and the supplementary election. INECs statement did not leave anyone in doubt. The attention of the Commission has been drawn to a purported declaration of a winner in the Adamawa Governorship election by the Resident Electoral Commissioner even when the process has not been concluded.

The action of the REC is a usurpation of the power of the Returning Officer. It is null and void and of no effect. Consequently, the collation of the results of the supplementary election is hereby suspended.

Thankfully, INEC concluded the exercise and declared the incumbent governor, Ahmadu Fintiri, as the winner of the governorship poll. Any further delay would have caused unnecessary anxieties for mob action and violence.

However, the facts of the matter must stand. Before the collation exercise was suspended on Saturday night, Binani was nowhere near winning the election as she was trailing Ahmadu Fintiri, the incumbent governor and candidate of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP). By this time, results from 10 local councils had been announced.

Nigerians were outraged by Yunusa-Aris unacceptable conduct and disregarded the announcement that he made. In the meantime, no one has told us where Mele Lamido, the Returning Officer, has been hiding; he just disappeared into thin air.

Was he part of the plot to sabotage the will of the people of Adamawa State? Could it be that the RO did not agree with the REC to announce Binani as the winner without results from all the 69 polling units?

The drama in Adamawa State happens in other states and it is a reflection of our inverted value system: we condone impunity without consequences and it has gone to great lengths to damage the moral fabric of society.

For example, why would a parent buy exam question papers for his/her children to gain undue advantage? The same parent will also join those accusing INEC of improper conduct of our elections. Isnt that hypocrisy?

After the meeting of its National Commissioners in Abuja which held on April 18 over the supplementary governorship election in Adamawa State, INEC resolved to write the Inspector General of Police for the immediate investigation and possible prosecution of Yunusa-Ari who, by the way, is a lawyer.

How can a lawyer superintend over such travesty and be the lead actor in a poorly scripted drama? To tell you the truth, Yunusa-Ari pretended to be an actor who wanted a Nollywood-like fame but he failed his audition woefully by announcing a fake election result that was not his responsibility in the first place.

Is he still a learned colleague? What action is the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) going to take?

INEC will also write to Boss Mustapha, the secretary to the government of the federation (SGF), to inform President Muhammadu Buhari that his appointee, Yunusa-Ari, has been unworthy of the appointment as Adamawa State REC. His unwholesome behaviour should be reported by the SGF for further action.

The commissioner of police in Adamawa State has been redeployed by the Inspector General of Police. That was a timely intervention and commendable action but it does not go far enough. He should be sanctioned immediately. Under his watch, Yunusa-Ari orchestrated a dangerous plot that could have sparked an orgy of violence.

We are all witnesses to the disgraceful conduct of politicians even in their parties where theres complete absence of internal democracy. The Labour Party has also joined APC and PDP in poor housekeeping manners because if you have been following the political developments in Imo State, Labour Party has two factions (Ikechukwu Ukaegbu and Chibutu Isiguzo factions laying claims to the ticket) in the run-up to the partys primary to elect its gubernatorial candidate.

With parallel primaries, the factions usually end up in court because politicians are generally bad losers everyone wants to win. Hows that possible?

If party primaries are fraught with rigging and violence, what then should we expect at the state and national elections? Are they not the same people?

When the outcomes of our elections are poor, we are quick to blame INEC instead of desperate politicians and their supporters. What in the world was Yunusa-Ari thinking when he declared Binani as the winner of the Adamawa governorship poll? Was he expecting Nigerians to clap for him?

He should have emulated the Returning Officer in the Abia State gubernatorial election, Prof Nnennaya Oti, vice chancellor of the Federal University of Technology, Owerri (FUTO) which Alex Otti won. This amazing amazon refused to be intimidated even at the risk to her life; she stood her ground and the will of Abia voters prevailed.

But Yunusa-Ari couldnt because he sold his conscience for a mess of porridge.

Braimah is a public relations strategist and publisher/editor-in-chief of Naija Times (https://ntm.ng)

Views expressed by contributors are strictly personal and not of TheCable.

See the article here:
Subversion of democracy in Adamawa - TheCable