Direct Democracy classically termed pure democracy
TWITTER ACC. https://twitter.com/lordfec [POSTED UNDER FAIR USE MEDIA REPORTING] FAIR USE NOTICE: This video may contain copyrighted material. Such material is made available for ...
By: Lord fec6
See the article here:
Direct Democracy classically termed pure democracy - Video
The End of Universal Democracy: The Cameron Cowan Show
Universal Democracy http://www.nytimes.com/2014/06/27/opinion/david-brooks-is-america-losing-faith-in-universal-democracy.html?
By: Cameron Cowan
Visit link:
The End of Universal Democracy: The Cameron Cowan Show - Video
Video 01 DDF Introduction to the Direct Democracy Forum
TWITTER ACC. https://twitter.com/lordfec [POSTED UNDER FAIR USE MEDIA REPORTING] FAIR USE NOTICE: This video may contain copyrighted material. Such material is made available for ...
By: Lord fec6
Original post:
Video 01 DDF Introduction to the Direct Democracy Forum - Video
Democracy is a lovely word. It evokes images of civil rights marchers singing We Shall Overcome in Birmingham, Ala. It is 10,000 keys jingling the message of Its time in Pragues Wenceslas Square 25 years ago. It is the delighted faces of Afghans and Iraqis holding up ink-stained fingers and the brief springtime of hope in Cairo.
Any serious system of democracy, however, has another word attached to it that is crucial to its success but is much less evocative, a word that is at best workmanlike and more likely to be accompanied by a shrug or an ugh than the thrill of human aspiration. That word is representative.
Buzzkill, right? And yet whatever you think of the political class, it is necessary to make democracy function. Even if advances in digital technology could take out these middlemen, elected officials would still be needed to counter the very real problem of tyranny of the majority. More than that, representative democracies, as James Madison wrote in the Federalist Papers, refine and enlarge the public views, by passing them through the medium of a chosen body of citizens, whose wisdom may best discern the true interest of the nation.
Representatives today are more often seen as bickering and inflexible than wise and discerning. Why the lack of love? Maybe because we know too much about them. A democracy requires public officials to live in the public eye, which was fine in the days before 24/7 media. The always-on spotlight, however, has burned away the privacy needed for representatives to consult one other, to blue-sky ideas, make deals, and compromise for the good of the nation and not just their own political survival or their partys advantage. Add to that the political expedient especially for members of the US House to stay close to constituents, fundraisers, and party purists, and you have a system that is broken.
The Monitor recently asked five experts how to fix the Congress. If there is a common theme in what these five (former Senate majority leaders Tom Daschle and Trent Lott, former House Speaker Dennis Hastert, Sarah Binder of the Brookings Institution and The George Mason University, and Jason Grumet, author of City of Rivals: Restoring the Glorious Mess of American Democracy) recommend it is that representatives be given space space away from the spotlight, space to do business, space free from relentless campaigning and opposition gotchas, space to make Capitol Hill their workplace and not just a base they tag once a week. (You can read what they say by clicking here.)
No one is calling for a return of the smoke-filled backroom or machine politics. Lets just acknowledge that the humans we elect need the latitude to do their jobs with some degree of privacy, just as you and I need when we are noodling with ideas and weighing what can be done against what we wish could be done. Lets acknowledge that a wise nation honors its human representatives as much as its democratic ideals.
John Yemma is editor-at-large of the Monitor. He can be reached at yemma@csmonitor.com.
Read the original:
Giving our representatives room
Norman Chan, the head of the Hong Kong Monetary Authority, said a continuation of the pro-democracy protests may dent the citys financial stability, as demonstrations entered a sixth week.
A peaceful end to the protests will be key for foreign investors, Chan told reporters today before joining a delegation to the Chinese capital of Beijing to meet regulators.
Protest leaders are debating their next move after talks with the government yielded no solution to the biggest challenge to Chinas sovereignty of Hong Kong since the city was returned from colonial rule in 1997. While the economy has so far shrugged off the protests, Chan joins other public officials in warning about the impact of a prolonged standoff that has seen roads blockaded in parts of the city.
Hong Kongs Autonomy
If the movement continues for a much longer time, then it may impact social stability and undermine rule of law in Hong Kong, Chan said. It may have a very negative impact on financial stability as well as Hong Kongs position as an international financial center.
Charles Li, the chief executive officer of Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing Ltd., said Oct. 26 that he wouldnt be surprised if the protests were among factors behind the wait for the regulatory approval of a stock market trading link with Shanghai.
John Tsang, Hong Kong's financial secretary, wrote on his blog that he hopes protesters dont hold a destroy first, then rebuild later attitude to deal with political reform. Close
John Tsang, Hong Kong's financial secretary, wrote on his blog that he hopes protesters... Read More
Close
John Tsang, Hong Kong's financial secretary, wrote on his blog that he hopes protesters dont hold a destroy first, then rebuild later attitude to deal with political reform.
Link:
Hong Kong Finance Chief Scolds Protesters as They Plan