Archive for the ‘Decentralization’ Category

MapleStory’s Integrating NFTs: Here’s What Players Should Expect – nft now

The Alpha:

Web3 gaming remains one of the most prospective NFT use cases in existence. With the global gaming market size reaching over $200 billion in 2022, the industry is ripe with potential. And it seems that Nexon is hoping to capitalize on some of that potential with one of its most beloved titles.

MapleStory is a cherished and storied name in the gaming community. One of Nexons primary IP offerings, the game has generated over $4 billion in revenue and secured 180 million registered players, according to a recent earnings report.

The blockchain-based iteration, MapleStory Universe, will be built on Polygon Supernets, a blockchain development platform aimed at helping Web3 developers create their own blockchain protocols. Polygon Supernets perform a similar function to that of Avalanche Subnets, to which theyre often compared. These networks allow developers to build and utilize a blockchain sub-network for individual projects, protecting them from sluggish performance issues on the main networks theyre a part of.

Polygon Labs, which is a development and growth team for the Polygon protocol, is set to provide technical and business support for the MapleStory Universe.

We are looking forward to expanding the NFT ecosystem envisioned by MapleStory Universe by building on Polygon, the top protocol for web3 gaming. It is the perfect choice to power the ecosystem, MapleStory Universe group leader Sun-young Hwang said in the press release. We will work closely with the team at Polygon Labs to develop and market the game.

In an article explaining why Nexon decided to turn to blockchain technology, the company noted that its goal is to create an NFT-centered ecosystem that allows players to have a full view of the decision-making, participate in IP development, and have actual ownership of their assets.

While there are many benefits of blockchain technology, Nexon has focused on three in particular: (1) Transparency, with all information recorded on-chain for anyone to see. (2) An open ecosystem, where anyone can contribute to the project and earn rewards for their contributions. (3) Extended utility, through the free movement of in-game assets, they wrote.

To this end, the team noted that users will have a clearer view of the decisions and changes that are made, as the developers design and decision-making processes will now be fully visible on-chain. And since the entire process is recorded on-chain, it will be more difficult for developers to change the rules on a whim, as they are fully visible to all users. The transparent governance of the blockchain and the decentralization of power that it provides makes developers design and decision-making processes fully visible and trustworthy. In this way, users can immerse themselves more easily in the virtual world, the team explained.

Whats more, Nexon will no longer be acting as an administrator with complete control of the server. Instead, it will be a developer participating in an open ecosystem. As a result, other contributors will be on more equal footing, and it will be easier to identify these other contributors. The company explains that this allows for more proactive contributions and ensures that contributors are fairly rewarded for their work.

This increase in transparency and decentralization certainly sounds like a good thing. But unfortunately, would-be players will have to wait a bit to see exactly how this all plays out, as the game currently has no release date.

Link:

MapleStory's Integrating NFTs: Here's What Players Should Expect - nft now

Theta Network (THETA-USD): Decentralized Video Streaming Is … – Seeking Alpha

Marcela Ruth Romero/iStock via Getty Images

Decentralization is the key benefit of blockchain technology and the race to apply it to video streaming is in full swing; Theta wants to usher video content into Web3 and create a new paradigm for how we digest and interact with our favorite video content.

Theta is no household name like Bitcoin (BTC-USD) or Ethereum (ETH-USD), but it may come as a surprise it was once a top 10 cryptocurrency by market cap before losing momentum (now ranked #51 by market cap).

According to Crunchbase, Theta Labs has raised $113 million in funding over five funding rounds. Theta has 32 employees based in the San Francisco Bay Area.

Theta is built on a decentralized video streaming network called Theta Network, which aims to disrupt the traditional video streaming industry. Instead of relying on ads or subscription fees to monetize content, Theta Network uses a dual-token system made up of the Theta USD (THETA-USD) token and Theta Fuel (TFUEL-USD) token to secure the network and incentivize creators and users.

Anything in our digital lives that is controlled by a large, centralized organization is ripe for disruption by blockchain technologies that can decentralize the respective use case and better align incentives between creators, users, and those providing the digital infrastructure.

In the video streaming space, YouTube reigns supreme and frankly, works pretty damn good. However, all the power is centralized at the top (Alphabet (GOOGL) owns YouTube) and any real incentives really only accrue to the largest video streamers. What if YouTube could be removed from the equation? In its place, a blockchain network built on code. Value creation can then be used to incentivize content creators, users, and those providing computing power for the network.

One factor for blockchain technologies that have an edge over centralized players is hosting the data. Alphabet, for example, has massive server costs to host all of the YouTube content. In a blockchain world, the storage costs can be decentralized across the network. Individuals willing to contribute digital storage space and computing power can provide that to the network and earn rewards.

Here is a quick diagram of Thetas video infrastructure:

Summary of Theta's Video Infrastructure (Theta Main Website)

Blockchain technology can also create a richer experience between creator and user. Hypothetically, users can directly earn rewards for watching videos, NFTs can be rewarded to users who achieve certain milestones, and those NFTs can create access to exclusive content or in-real-life events.

According to Messari Research, "Theta TV is the leading application on the Theta Network with millions of users. Theta TV is similar to Twitch, both are live streaming platforms, but users on Theta TV can simultaneously earn rewards for relaying the stream to others. In addition, Samsung VR, Pandora, and MGM are partnering with Theta to use the Network."

It has established partnerships to run enterprise validators on their network with the following organizations:

Enterprise Validator Partners (Theta Network Main Site)

Theta aims to make this a reality through their Mainnet 4.0 (Metachain), which they claim will allow Web3 media, entertainment, and virtual world businesses to scale even more than current Web2 platforms. The team launched the Theta Mainnet 4.0 and related tools on a testnet in October 2022, with a full release in December 2022. Since the release, the Metachain sees around 20,000 transactions per day and around 15,000 daily active wallets. For some perspective, the Cardano network sees anywhere from 50,000 to 100,000 daily active wallets. Given how recently the Metachain was released, this is impressive growth.

It should be noted that Livepeer (LPT-USD) is Theta's primary competitor and has been able to generate organic demand for their network as well.

Statistics on Theta and Theta Fuel Token Activity (Theta's Block Explorer)

There are two tokens in this ecosystem: Theta (THETA) and Theta Fuel (TFUEL).

The THETA token is basically the governance token and used for staking to earn TFUEL. The TFUEL token is a utility token that is paid out as a reward to validators, viewers, and those willing to contribute storage and computing power for the network.

Theta's Token Allocation (CoinGecko)

The token allocation or tokenomics is good but not great. There is a 20% insider share (Team + Partners), but the more worrisome part is the 36.3% in Theta Lab Reserves. That is a lot of Theta token that could be dumped on the market. On the bright side, the THETA token has a fixed supply like bitcoin, meaning inflation will not corrode the value over the long term.

TFUEL, on the other hand, has a 5% inflation rate and no max supply. Here is a comparison of the two tokens:

Theta vs. Theta Fuel (Messari)

Theta Price Action

Theta has fallen over 90% from the all-time high to just over $1 per token, after reaching over $13 in May of 2021.

Theta (THETA) Price Chart (CoinMarketCap)

Similar price action for TFUEL:

Theta Fuel (TFUEL) Price Chart (CoinMarketCap)

Many in Web3 have an end goal of being fully decentralized, but it order to bootstrap growth they often sacrifice decentralization in order to establish themselves, with a goal of decentralizing later.

Theta is no exception. Theta is fairly centralized with most decisions made by Theta Labs and the 20-30 enterprise validator nodes. Then they also have guardian nodes and Edge nodes which just add to the confusion.

Weve gone and tested out Theta.TV and its frankly not great. This is not to say it will be bad forever. In fact, creating a decentralized video infrastructure network is incredibly complex and the team should be given credit for even trying to tackle such a massive project. This technology is still very early and they've been able to secure partnerships that should help improve the content quality over time. Theta Labs recently published additional information on their Mainnet launch and content partners.

They recently launched an new roadmap here:

Theta's recently released 2023 Roadmap (Theta Webpage)

Theta is tackling a very complex issue in creating a decentralized video network. It is still so early. Yes, there is upside potential but there are so many unknowns. The 36% of the token distribution in Theta Labs is a concern but it may be used for value-adding purposes like capital expenditures or acquisitions.

The Theta Fuel (TFUEL) token may be where the value accrues since it is really the reward mechanism for creators and network users. But the Theta Fuel token has 5% inflation rate, which is essentially a 5% hurdle rate.

Theta needs to decentralize further.

Lastly, Livepeer is a formidable competitor, and an analysis of Livepeer will be provided in the near future.

Theta is one to watch, but it is not worthy of an investment at this time.

More:

Theta Network (THETA-USD): Decentralized Video Streaming Is ... - Seeking Alpha

The Institutionalization of Bitcoin: Effects on Price and Adoption – Finance Magnates

Bitcoin's risehas been one of the most significant financial events in the last decade.Bitcoin has grown from its humble beginnings as a decentralized, peer-to-peerpayment system to a global phenomenon, with a market capitalization of morethan $1 trillion as of March 2023.

However, asBitcoin has grown in popularity, it has also grown in institutionalization,with large financial institutions and corporations investing in Bitcoin andother cryptocurrencies. In this article, we will look at how institutionalizationaffects the price and adoption of Bitcoin.

The process bywhich a new financial asset or technology is adopted by mainstream financialinstitutions such as banks, hedge funds, and pension funds is referred to asinstitutionalization. Increased liquidity, price stability, and broaderadoption of the asset or technology can result from institutionalization.

Institutionalizationhas taken various forms in the case of Bitcoin. Large financial institutions,such as JPMorgan and Goldman Sachs, have begun to offer their clientsBitcoin-related investment products.

Keep Reading

Bitcoin hasbeen used as a store of value by major corporations such as Tesla andMicroStrategy. Furthermore, regulatory bodies such as the United StatesSecurities and Exchange Commission (SEC) have begun to provide guidance on theregulation of cryptocurrencies.

Bitcoin's pricehas been significantly influenced by its institutionalization. Bitcoin's pricewas highly volatile in its early days, with large price swings occurring on aregular basis. However, as more institutional investors have entered the market, theprice has stabilized.

A variety offactors have contributed to this increased stability. For starters,institutional investors are typically long-term investors who prioritizeportfolio diversification and risk management.

This means theyare less likely to sell their Bitcoin holdings during market volatility, whichcan help to limit price swings.

Furthermore,institutional investors frequently invest large sums of money in Bitcoin, whichcan help to keep the price stable. For example, when Tesla announced inFebruary 2021 that it had invested $1.5 billion in Bitcoin, the price of Bitcoinincreased by more than 10% in a single day.

Bitcoin'sincreased stability has also made it a more appealing investment fortraditional investors like pension funds and endowments. These investorstypically have strict investment policies that require them to invest inlow-volatility assets. As Bitcoin becomes more stable, these investors are morelikely to consider adding it to their portfolios.

Bitcoin'sinstitutionalization has also had a significant impact on its adoption. In theearly days of Bitcoin, it was primarily used for peer-to-peer transactions byindividuals and small businesses. However, as more institutions have enteredthe market, Bitcoin has begun to gain acceptance as a form of payment.

PayPal, forexample, began allowing its users to buy, hold, and sell Bitcoin in late 2020.This move was interpreted as a significant endorsement of Bitcoin by amainstream financial institution, and it aided in increasing adoption by makingit easier for people to buy and sell Bitcoin.

Furthermore,Bitcoin's institutionalization has helped to improve its reputation and buildtrust among mainstream investors. Bitcoin was initially associated with illegalactivities, such as money laundering and drug trafficking.

However, asmore institutions have invested in Bitcoin and regulatory authorities haveissued guidance on its use, it has gained acceptance as a legitimate asset.

While Bitcoinhas benefited greatly from institutionalization, it has also presented somechallenges. One of the most significant challenges is the possibility of marketmanipulation by large institutional investors.

If a smallgroup of investors controls a significant portion of the Bitcoin market, theymay be able to manipulate the price by purchasing or selling large amounts ofBitcoin.

Furthermore,the increased regulatory scrutiny that comes with institutionalization may posedifficulties for Bitcoin. Regulatory authorities may impose restrictions on theuse of cryptocurrencies or impose strict reporting requirements oninstitutions. Institutions that invest in Bitcoin may incur additional costsand administrative burdens as a result of this.

Finally,Bitcoin's increasing centralization may raise concerns about thedecentralization that was one of its founding principles. As more institutionsbecome involved in Bitcoin, the risk of it becoming more centralized andcontrolled by a small group of investors or institutions increases.

Bitcoin hasbeen the topic of many debates since its inception in 2009. As Bitcoin hasgained more attention and popularity, the possibility of itsinstitutionalization has become a growing concern among its supporters.

Theinstitutionalization of Bitcoin refers to the process of large financialinstitutions such as banks, hedge funds, and investment firms incorporatingBitcoin into their business models. While some argue that this would increase the adoption and legitimacy of the cryptocurrency, others believe that it wouldultimately lead to the end of Bitcoin.

One of thereasons why the institutionalization of Bitcoin could lead to its demise isbecause it goes against the core principles of the cryptocurrency. Bitcoin wascreated as an alternative to the traditional financial system, which isdominated by large institutions that control the flow of money. By allowingthese institutions to incorporate Bitcoin into their business models, it couldlead to a concentration of power and influence in the hands of a few players,which would defeat the purpose of decentralization.

Another reasonwhy the institutionalization of Bitcoin could lead to its downfall is thepotential for increased regulation. As Bitcoin becomes more mainstream andwidely used, governments may feel compelled to regulate it more heavily. Thiscould lead to restrictions on the use of Bitcoin and make it less attractive toindividuals who value its anonymity and lack of government oversight.

Furthermore,the institutionalization of Bitcoin would also likely correlate with increasedvolatility in the cryptocurrency market. Large financial institutions have asignificant amount of power and influence in the financial world, and theirparticipation in the Bitcoin market could lead to rapid fluctuations in itsvalue. This could make it difficult for individuals and businesses to useBitcoin as a stable store of value or medium of exchange.

Lastly, theprocess could likely lead to the creation of alternative cryptocurrencies thatbetter align with the principles of decentralization. As Bitcoin becomes moremainstream, some individuals may become disillusioned with itsinstitutionalization and seek out alternative cryptocurrencies that are more inline with their values. This could lead to a fragmentation of thecryptocurrency market, which could ultimately weaken Bitcoin's position as thedominant cryptocurrency.

Bitcoin's priceand adoption have been significantly influenced by its institutionalization.Institutional investors have helped to stabilize the market and improveBitcoin's reputation among mainstream investors.

As a result,Bitcoin has grown in popularity and is increasingly being used as a form ofpayment.

However,institutionalization has brought with it new challenges, such as thepossibility of market manipulation and increased regulatory scrutiny.

It is criticalfor the Bitcoin community to prioritize decentralization and ensure that thebenefits of institutionalization do not come at the expense of the fundamentalprinciples that distinguish Bitcoin.

It will beinteresting to see how institutionalization shapes Bitcoin's development as itevolves and matures. It is clear that institutionalization has had asignificant impact on Bitcoin in recent years, but how this will play out inthe future remains to be seen.

Bitcoin's risehas been one of the most significant financial events in the last decade.Bitcoin has grown from its humble beginnings as a decentralized, peer-to-peerpayment system to a global phenomenon, with a market capitalization of morethan $1 trillion as of March 2023.

However, asBitcoin has grown in popularity, it has also grown in institutionalization,with large financial institutions and corporations investing in Bitcoin andother cryptocurrencies. In this article, we will look at how institutionalizationaffects the price and adoption of Bitcoin.

The process bywhich a new financial asset or technology is adopted by mainstream financialinstitutions such as banks, hedge funds, and pension funds is referred to asinstitutionalization. Increased liquidity, price stability, and broaderadoption of the asset or technology can result from institutionalization.

Institutionalizationhas taken various forms in the case of Bitcoin. Large financial institutions,such as JPMorgan and Goldman Sachs, have begun to offer their clientsBitcoin-related investment products.

Keep Reading

Bitcoin hasbeen used as a store of value by major corporations such as Tesla andMicroStrategy. Furthermore, regulatory bodies such as the United StatesSecurities and Exchange Commission (SEC) have begun to provide guidance on theregulation of cryptocurrencies.

Bitcoin's pricehas been significantly influenced by its institutionalization. Bitcoin's pricewas highly volatile in its early days, with large price swings occurring on aregular basis. However, as more institutional investors have entered the market, theprice has stabilized.

A variety offactors have contributed to this increased stability. For starters,institutional investors are typically long-term investors who prioritizeportfolio diversification and risk management.

This means theyare less likely to sell their Bitcoin holdings during market volatility, whichcan help to limit price swings.

Furthermore,institutional investors frequently invest large sums of money in Bitcoin, whichcan help to keep the price stable. For example, when Tesla announced inFebruary 2021 that it had invested $1.5 billion in Bitcoin, the price of Bitcoinincreased by more than 10% in a single day.

Bitcoin'sincreased stability has also made it a more appealing investment fortraditional investors like pension funds and endowments. These investorstypically have strict investment policies that require them to invest inlow-volatility assets. As Bitcoin becomes more stable, these investors are morelikely to consider adding it to their portfolios.

Bitcoin'sinstitutionalization has also had a significant impact on its adoption. In theearly days of Bitcoin, it was primarily used for peer-to-peer transactions byindividuals and small businesses. However, as more institutions have enteredthe market, Bitcoin has begun to gain acceptance as a form of payment.

PayPal, forexample, began allowing its users to buy, hold, and sell Bitcoin in late 2020.This move was interpreted as a significant endorsement of Bitcoin by amainstream financial institution, and it aided in increasing adoption by makingit easier for people to buy and sell Bitcoin.

Furthermore,Bitcoin's institutionalization has helped to improve its reputation and buildtrust among mainstream investors. Bitcoin was initially associated with illegalactivities, such as money laundering and drug trafficking.

However, asmore institutions have invested in Bitcoin and regulatory authorities haveissued guidance on its use, it has gained acceptance as a legitimate asset.

While Bitcoinhas benefited greatly from institutionalization, it has also presented somechallenges. One of the most significant challenges is the possibility of marketmanipulation by large institutional investors.

If a smallgroup of investors controls a significant portion of the Bitcoin market, theymay be able to manipulate the price by purchasing or selling large amounts ofBitcoin.

Furthermore,the increased regulatory scrutiny that comes with institutionalization may posedifficulties for Bitcoin. Regulatory authorities may impose restrictions on theuse of cryptocurrencies or impose strict reporting requirements oninstitutions. Institutions that invest in Bitcoin may incur additional costsand administrative burdens as a result of this.

Finally,Bitcoin's increasing centralization may raise concerns about thedecentralization that was one of its founding principles. As more institutionsbecome involved in Bitcoin, the risk of it becoming more centralized andcontrolled by a small group of investors or institutions increases.

Bitcoin hasbeen the topic of many debates since its inception in 2009. As Bitcoin hasgained more attention and popularity, the possibility of itsinstitutionalization has become a growing concern among its supporters.

Theinstitutionalization of Bitcoin refers to the process of large financialinstitutions such as banks, hedge funds, and investment firms incorporatingBitcoin into their business models. While some argue that this would increase the adoption and legitimacy of the cryptocurrency, others believe that it wouldultimately lead to the end of Bitcoin.

One of thereasons why the institutionalization of Bitcoin could lead to its demise isbecause it goes against the core principles of the cryptocurrency. Bitcoin wascreated as an alternative to the traditional financial system, which isdominated by large institutions that control the flow of money. By allowingthese institutions to incorporate Bitcoin into their business models, it couldlead to a concentration of power and influence in the hands of a few players,which would defeat the purpose of decentralization.

Another reasonwhy the institutionalization of Bitcoin could lead to its downfall is thepotential for increased regulation. As Bitcoin becomes more mainstream andwidely used, governments may feel compelled to regulate it more heavily. Thiscould lead to restrictions on the use of Bitcoin and make it less attractive toindividuals who value its anonymity and lack of government oversight.

Furthermore,the institutionalization of Bitcoin would also likely correlate with increasedvolatility in the cryptocurrency market. Large financial institutions have asignificant amount of power and influence in the financial world, and theirparticipation in the Bitcoin market could lead to rapid fluctuations in itsvalue. This could make it difficult for individuals and businesses to useBitcoin as a stable store of value or medium of exchange.

Lastly, theprocess could likely lead to the creation of alternative cryptocurrencies thatbetter align with the principles of decentralization. As Bitcoin becomes moremainstream, some individuals may become disillusioned with itsinstitutionalization and seek out alternative cryptocurrencies that are more inline with their values. This could lead to a fragmentation of thecryptocurrency market, which could ultimately weaken Bitcoin's position as thedominant cryptocurrency.

Bitcoin's priceand adoption have been significantly influenced by its institutionalization.Institutional investors have helped to stabilize the market and improveBitcoin's reputation among mainstream investors.

As a result,Bitcoin has grown in popularity and is increasingly being used as a form ofpayment.

However,institutionalization has brought with it new challenges, such as thepossibility of market manipulation and increased regulatory scrutiny.

It is criticalfor the Bitcoin community to prioritize decentralization and ensure that thebenefits of institutionalization do not come at the expense of the fundamentalprinciples that distinguish Bitcoin.

It will beinteresting to see how institutionalization shapes Bitcoin's development as itevolves and matures. It is clear that institutionalization has had asignificant impact on Bitcoin in recent years, but how this will play out inthe future remains to be seen.

Continued here:

The Institutionalization of Bitcoin: Effects on Price and Adoption - Finance Magnates

Sen. Cruz Introduces Legislation to Prohibit the Fed From … – Senator Ted Cruz

WASHINGTON, D.C. U.S. Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas), Ranking Member of the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, today introduced legislationto prohibit the Federal Reserve from developing a direct-to-consumer central bank digital currency which could be used as a financial surveillance tool by the federal government. Sen. Cruzs bill was cosponsored by Sens. Braun (R-Ind.) and Grassley (R-Iowa).

As countries like China develop CBDCs that omit the benefits and protections of cash, as well as the control and security of many existing digital cryptocurrencies, it is more important than ever to ensure the United States digital currency policy protects financial privacy, maintains the dollars dominance, and cultivates innovation.CBDCs that fail to adhere to these three basic principles could enable an entity like the Federal Reserve to mobilize itself into a retail bank, collect personally identifiable information on users, and track their transactions indefinitely. It is important to note that while the Fed does not, and should not, have the authority to offer retail bank accounts, it is already looking into what establishing a digital currency would look like.

Unlike decentralized digital currencies like Bitcoin, CBDCs are issued and backed by a government entity and transact on a centralized, permissioned blockchain. Not only would this CBDC model centralize Americans financial information, leaving it vulnerable to attack, it could be used as direct surveillance tool into the private transactions of Americans.

Upon introducing the legislation, Sen. Cruz said:

The federal government has no authority to unilaterally establish a central bank currency. This bill goes a long way in making sure big government doesnt attempt to centralize or control cryptocurrency and instead, allows it to thrive in the United States. We should be empowering entrepreneurs, enabling innovation, and increasing individual freedomnot stifling it.

Sen. Braun said:

"Allowing the government to centralize Americans financial information and increase surveillance of Americans financial activity is simply a bad idea. The federal government should not have even more control over your own money. I support this legislation to allow entrepreneurship to prosper and keep the federal government from further encroaching on your privacy rights."

Sen. Grassley said:

The American people ought to be able to spend their money how they choose without the possibility that every transaction could be tracked by the government. Policy this impactful should be made by Congress, not government bureaucrats, and our bill would ensure that no one is snooping on the finances of hardworking Americans. Every American deserves that peace of mind.

Adam Brandon, president and CEO of FreedomWorks, said:

"The Federal Reserves exploration into Central Bank Digital Currency raises serious questions regarding the continued development of the digital economy, consumer privacy, and the eventual transition to a cashless system of payments. One of the most significant features that draw people to digital assets is decentralization, and there is no central authority that manages the supply and value of most digital assets. The United States must not follow countries like China down the path of digital authoritarianism but instead preserve a payment system that promotes consumer privacy and security."

Sen. Cruz previously introduced this bill in2022.

###

See the rest here:

Sen. Cruz Introduces Legislation to Prohibit the Fed From ... - Senator Ted Cruz

Belgium Data Center Market Investment Analysis Report 2023-2028 Featuring Key DC Investors – AtlasEdge, Digital Realty, Datacenter United, Etix…

Company Logo

Belgian Data Center Market

Belgian Data Center Market

Dublin, March 23, 2023 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- The "Belgium Data Center Market - Investment Analysis & Growth Opportunities 2023-2028" report has been added to ResearchAndMarkets.com's offering.

The Belgium data center market size will witness investments of USD 2.81 billion by 2028, growing at a CAGR of 5.31%. from 2022-2028

This report analyses the Belgium data center market share. It elaboratively analyses the existing and upcoming facilities and investments in IT, electrical, mechanical infrastructure, general construction, and tier standards. It discusses market sizing and investment estimation for different segments.

Belgium is one of the emerging destinations in Western Europe for data center development. The country offers a geographical advantage as it is situated in the middle of the FLAP market and continuously attracts foreign investments. The capital Brussels hosts the maximum number of data centers in the country. The city has around 82% of Belgium's total existing data center space. The capital provides great connectivity, a highly digital economy, and a hub for innovation, research, and development.

Organizations across the country are migrating their workloads to the cloud and contributing towards meeting the digitalization goals of the country, driving the need for colocation data centers and decreasing the share of enterprise data centers. Steps are being taken to create a model for energy decentralization, while data center operators nationwide plan to be carbon-neutral in their operations. KevlinX, EdgeConneX, and LCL Datacenters are a part of the Carbon Neutral Data Central Pact.

The country is connected to other parts of the world with submarine cables. It has a presence of four operational submarine cables, such as SeaMeWe-3, Concerto, Pan European Crossing, and Tangerine, while one submarine cable is in the pipeline.

WHY SHOULD YOU BUY THIS RESEARCH?

Market size available in the investment, area, power capacity, and Belgium colocation market revenue.

An assessment of the data center investment in Belgium by colocation and enterprise operators.

Investments in the area (square feet) and power capacity (MW) across the locations in the country.

A detailed study of the existing Belgium data center industry landscape, an in-depth industry analysis, and insightful predictions about industry size during the forecast period.

Snapshot of existing and upcoming third-party data center facilities in Belgium

a) Facilities Covered (Existing): 25

b) Facilities Identified (Upcoming): 04

c) Coverage: 11+ Locations

d) Existing vs. Upcoming (Area)

e) Existing vs. Upcoming (IT Load Capacity)

Data center colocation market in Belgium

a) Colocation Market Revenue & Forecast (2022-2028)

b) Wholesale vs. Retail Colocation Revenue (2022-2028)

c) Retail Colocation Pricing

d) Wholesale Colocation Pricing

Belgium market investments are classified into IT, power, cooling, and general construction services with sizing and forecast.

A comprehensive analysis of the latest trends, growth rate, potential opportunities, growth restraints, and prospects for the industry.

Business overview and product offerings of prominent IT infrastructure providers, construction contractors, support infrastructure providers, and investors operating in the industry.

A transparent research methodology and the analysis of the demand and supply aspects of the industry.

Story continues

EXISTING VS. UPCOMING DATA CENTERS

Key Attributes:

Report Attribute

Details

No. of Pages

52

Forecast Period

2022 - 2028

Estimated Market Value (USD) in 2022

$2060 Million

Forecasted Market Value (USD) by 2028

$2810 Million

Compound Annual Growth Rate

5.3%

Regions Covered

Belgium

VENDOR LANDSCAPE

IT Infrastructure Providers

Data Center Construction Contractors & Sub-Contractors

AECOM

Artelia

Lascent

Logi-tek

ISG

Mercury

M-J Wood Group Kft

Perseusz

PM Group

RKD

Support Infrastructure Providers

Data Center Investors

AtlasEdge

Digital Realty

Datacenter United

Etix Everywhere

Google

LCL Datacenters

Microsoft

Proximus

New Entrants

REPORT COVERAGE:

IT Infrastructure

Network Infrastructure

Electrical Infrastructure

Mechanical Infrastructure

Cooling Systems

CRAC & CRAH Units

Chiller Units

Cooling Towers, Condensers & Dry Coolers

Economizers & Evaporative Coolers

Other Cooling Units

General Construction

Core & Shell Development

Installation & commissioning Services

Engineering & Building Design

Fire Detection & Suppression Systems

Physical Security

DCIM

Tier Standard

Tier I & Tier II

Tier III

Tier IV

Geography

For more information about this report visit https://www.researchandmarkets.com/r/v8z8x4

About ResearchAndMarkets.comResearchAndMarkets.com is the world's leading source for international market research reports and market data. We provide you with the latest data on international and regional markets, key industries, the top companies, new products and the latest trends.

Attachment

Excerpt from:

Belgium Data Center Market Investment Analysis Report 2023-2028 Featuring Key DC Investors - AtlasEdge, Digital Realty, Datacenter United, Etix...