Archive for the ‘Culture Wars’ Category

Column: Culture wars, right-wing experiments will damage schools – Richmond Times-Dispatch

All new episode of 8@4 has stories on a new baseball card shop, meeting a new artists and some delicious bar food to enjoy during March basketball viewing. 8@4 is presented by Massey Cancer Center from the Virginia Wayside Furniture studio.

Over the past five years, the determination to improve education in Virginia has been bipartisan.

Under Gov. Ralph Northams leadership and with both Republican majorities and then Democratic majorities, the legislature consistently invested in education, raising teacher pay, adding school counselors, coming closer to fulfilling our states obligation to fully fund schools, and more. It also focused on policies that would provide more opportunities for more students, such as expanding pre-K, rethinking how we assess students and making our community colleges more robust and accessible.

This continued under the first year of Gov. Glenn Youngkins administration, when the legislature passed Gov. Northams final budget, which included record investments in K-12 education, and unanimously passed the Literacy Act, a much-needed law to increase literacy rates across the commonwealth.

People are also reading

All this is to say that, here in Virginia, weve begun to recognize that a world-class education is the ticket to upward mobility, strengthening our middle class and creating safe and prosperous communities. And although it may seem unlikely, Democrats and Republicans do want the same thing: for our children to feel safe and excel in their school environment, for Virginia to have the best public schools in the nation and to ensure that parents have meaningful involvement in their childs schooling. As a high school civics and history teacher and state delegate, I believe that further progress for our students and schools requires big, bipartisan solutions and investments.

Right now, I fear that our bipartisan consensus is being ruptured by political culture wars and unilateral right-wing policy experiments that will damage our public school system.

Last week, Gov. Youngkin participated in a town hall on CNN to address his education agenda. He says it will give parents a voice in education and put school excellence first. The problem here is that these truisms, which all Virginians, regardless of political party, want, require thoughtful policy decisions in consultation with stakeholders across the political and educational spectrums. Reforming testing and accreditation, adopting new history standards, respecting all parents and their students and raising standards in all classrooms require large-scale buy in and group effort.

But instead of seeking consultation and outreach, weve seen the opposite. Gov. Youngkin has instituted a teacher tip line for people to accuse teachers of teaching divisive concepts, crafted ideologically driven history standards in secret, attempted to defund public schools with a voucher program and then continuously accused Democrats and educators of wanting to divide communities and lower standards.

Virginia Gov. Glenn Youngkin visits a classroom at Colonial Forge High School in Stafford in September.

So lets talk about what the governor can do, in conjunction with the legislature, educators and Republicans and Democrats, to keep Virginia a national leader in education:

We should fully fund the implementation of the Literacy Act through eighth grade, which the governors budget proposal failed to do.

Adopt large portions of the Senates budget proposal, including uncapping the amount we provide localities for support staff and continuing to give teachers pay raises. Both were not included in the governors budget in order to give corporations a tax cut, and both are necessary to keep our school systems on a positive trajectory.

Work collaboratively, rather than secretively, on assessment and accreditation reform to get the large-scale bipartisan support needed to ensure both can be fully implemented with political, communal and educational buy in.

Adopt the history standards proposed by professional educators who specialize in history that married the initial proposals with Gov. Youngkins proposals. This work, which was done over two years with hundreds of stakeholders all over the commonwealth, can be approved with the governors suggested edits rather than thoughtless wholesale replacement.

Drop attempts to privatize our public schools with voucher programs and think about how we can add career and technical education programs, magnet schools and other forms of curriculum and school diversity within our public schools. Thats a much better way to serve the many different educational needs of our students, rather than private-equity experimentation. The county I represent and teach in, Henrico, does an excellent job of providing students with options while being accountable to taxpayers.

All this would require transparent, public and bipartisan collaboration. After last weeks national town hall, I hope that the governor is more inclined to have these critical conversations with community members and leaders for the betterment of our childrens future and the commonwealth. Its time to stop playing politics with our kids education and get to work theres too much on the line.

Rodeo

04-18-1986 (cutline): A rodeo clown's job is to protect cowboys, but ometimes they get in trouble.

Rodeo

07-22-1982 (cutline): Wally Terry (right), Clint Corey, and Marty Terry (left), all from California, takes hatts off to music of 'America the Beautiful' at the rodeo.

Rodeo

04-02-1977 (cutline): John Gilstrap is a laugh-maker and a life-saver, all rolled into one. Such is the double life of a rodeo clown.To the unsophisticated viewer, he's just another funny man with a painted face, silly wig and baggy clothes. But to the bull-riding cowboys on the rodeo circuit, Gilstraph is the difference many times between life and death.

Rodeo

03-25-1973 (cutline): Bobby Rowe, horse man for rodeo and one of this subjects.

Rodeo

03-23-1973 (cutline): Rodeo veteran takes practice turn around barrel race course. Mrs. Jackie Thompson wears lucky garb as she rides 'King Penn.'

Rodeo

03-21-1973 (cutline): Some of the 100 riders and 175 animals who'll be competing in the Loretta Lynn Longhorn World Championship Rode that will begin tomorrow at the Richmond Coliseum have already settled into town. The riders will be competing for about $12,000 in prize money and championship points of the International Rodeo Association.

Rodeo

03-23-1973 (cutline): Mother-daughter duo drove from Texas to compete in rodeo here. Mrs. Thompson will Ride 'Penn,' Mrs. Sondra Gill, 'Mighty Barrs.'

Rodeo

05-27-1972 (cutline): Mrs. Helen Panzella waits to perform. Rodeo star is also nursing student.

Rodeo

05-28-1972 (cutline): Bill Keating tried not to comply with the creature's wishes yesterday as he participated in a steer wrestling competition in the Acca Temple Shrine Rodeo at City Stadium. The rodeo winds up its three-day stint today.

Rodeo

03-24-1972 (cutline): The World Championship Rodeo at the Richmond Coliseum.

Rodeo

03-23-1972: World Championship Rodeo at the Richmond Coliseum

Rodeo

03-22-1972 (cutline): Mrs. Nola Freeman is rodeo secretary.

Rodeo

04-18-1986 (cutline): Mini-cowboy at work--Animals part of show too.

Link:
Column: Culture wars, right-wing experiments will damage schools - Richmond Times-Dispatch

Community Voices: Using our schools and children to fight culture … – The Sentinel

As a resident of Carlisle, I have many reasons to feel proud of our community and fortunate to have settled here to finish my career and retire. Three major institutions Dickinson College, Penn State Dickinson Law, and the U.S. Army War College bring a strong cultural and economic base. A vital downtown bolstered by healthy civic pride adds significantly to our quality of life.

Although my wife and I dont have school-age kids, I often hear about and witness the quality of our local school system. Among my acquaintances, the picture of the Carlisle Area School District is a very positive one.

Unfortunately, we are witnessing a national movement that seeks to impose its political and moral views on a local level by very organized attempts to take control of local school boards. Groups like Moms for Liberty and No Left Turn in Education are in fact working toward a right turn in education with the support of political PACs such as the American Principles Project and the 1776 Project PAC.

People are also reading

At a more basic level, this is a calculated and well-funded strategy to gain political dominance by gaining control at all levels of government and building a farm team of conservative candidates. School board elections are the primary battleground, and culture war issues are the chosen weapons.

We are seeing this strategy develop right here in Cumberland County, and specifically in the Carlisle area. The Take Back Our Schools PAC seeks to elect school board directors in the Cumberland County region in 2023 who will defend parents rights and fight CRT and the hyper-sexualization of our kids in schools.

Moms for Liberty is a national organization that began in Florida. It claims a nonpartisan status and doesnt have to disclose its donors. A local chapter was started in 2021 with a divine calling and a mission to stoke the fires of liberty. Their issues include masks, Critical Race Theory (CRT), Social and Emotional Learning (SEL), pornographic books, [and] political activism in the classroom Schools are a center for reading, writing, civics and arithmetic.

And they want to spread awareness and an understanding of the limited role of government and stand together against government overreach and intimidation tactics. These organizations often claim to be nonpartisan, but that seems to be a pretty thin veneer. Barb Gleim, our local legislative representative, appears as a proud member and promoter of this local chapter.

Recently, a group that appears to be associated with this chapter has come forward to run as a Republican team for the Carlisle Area School District board. They call themselves CASD Team For Change, and Barb Gleim is literally in the picture.

So, the natural question is What changes do they seek?

They mention a few things we all would like to change, like falling test scores and rising property taxes. But what about poor communication between parents and the board and teaching the trendy ideology of the day. Ive neither seen nor heard evidence that these are actual problems.

Of course, change is a constant, in all current life, including education. And we have a school board that has proven competent to deal with whats been thrown at them as they have continued the legacy of a fine education system in this district.

As part of last years search for a new superintendent, a series of focus groups were held with different groups of stakeholders in our school system, including parents, teachers, staff, students and community leaders, in order to identify challenges a new superintendent would face and strengths they would need. While some areas needing improvement were identified, the overall picture was one of a healthy, transparent and responsive system.

Is there really a need to make a drastic change away from a tried-and-true team to one that seems most interested in promoting an ideology?

Citizens for Carlisle Schools is a group of five cross-filed candidates for the CASD board. It includes three incumbents Paula Bussard, current president of the board, Bruce Clash and Jon Tarrant along with two newcomers Donny Martinez and Joe Shane. This group is committed to maintaining that which parents and students feel strongly about and continuously working to improve our fine school system.

Schools exist to provide education. Our schools and children shouldnt be used to fight culture wars. Please, educate yourself about the agendas of these outside groups and their local counterparts. Then vote on May 16.

John Sigle was a professor of computer science for almost 40 years and has written more than 70 opinion pieces for four newspapers.

Get opinion pieces, letters and editorials sent directly to your inbox weekly!

Read the original:
Community Voices: Using our schools and children to fight culture ... - The Sentinel

How The Culture Wars Weren’t Won (with Jane Coaston) – The Bulwark

Hello, everyone, and welcome to the Focus Group podcast. Im Sarah Longwell, Publisher of The Bulwark and this week, were talking about the great war of western civilization, the woke culture war. The general of the culture war soon to be presidential candidate, Rhonda Santos, will probably run under the slogan America, where woke goes to die. And woke this is such a catchall villain that when Silicon Valley Bank collapsed last week, DeSantis, Josh Holly, and The Wall Street Journal editorial page inexplicably blamed it on vokeness. Now, we wanted to get a sense of how voters across the political spectrum think about a lot of the big culture war buzzwords of our time.

And unsurprisingly, we found that people are talking past each other a lot. Now, Im very excited. My guest today is Jane Coastin, opinion writer at The New York Times and one of the most concise of commentators on our political discourse today. Jane, thanks so much for being here. Thank you so much for having me.

So, correct me if Im wrong, but your thesis on the culture wars is that they made great political sense because they are unwinnable and unlusable. Can you tease that out for us, especially in light of all the legislation were seeing around the country that do notch real wins and losses in some of these Culture War battles.

They do notch real actual wins and losses think its important to note that a forever war has casualties. If theres anything that we have learned from our own actual forever wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, that have killed hundreds of thousands of people. But what I mean by not having winners or losers, I mean that they can be fought forever because What would it mean to win the culture war? What would it mean if for Republicans to make a reference scripture if every knee bend it and every tongue confessed that Adam and Eve, if not Adam and Steve Right. that people smell might be doing that somewhere.

But there is no means by which you could tell that you were winning and youre always losing, but youre also always winning. Ive referenced this before, but theres this understanding, and Im going to use the f word here, but I dont mean it in this way. Theres an understanding in the study of fascism. That fascisms enemies are always portrayed as being simultaneously overwhelmingly powerful, but also really stupid. That they are just fumbling idiots, but also theyre gonna kill all of you.

And I feel as if sometimes thats how culture wars are performed. That the enemy in the culture war is evil, but stupid. They will beat you but you could easily beat them if you just try it a little bit harder. And so when I talk about how they are unwinnable and unreasonable, I mean that theres no marker at which you could say We won. We did it.

I cannot think of the number of national review pieces that are ex indicates that we are winning the culture war. I I remember there was a poll I think in two thousand nine in which support for marriage equality ticked down slightly. And this is before marriage equality had reached, like, seventy five percent approval, which is what it has now. But it was like, oh, you know, were winning this war. Well, I mean, how did that go?

But I think it its interesting to me that the culture war has become everything is wrapped up into it. Every decision, even decisions that have nothing to do with culture, even decisions that seem completely untethered to the culture war, become part of the culture war. And ideas that were once believed to be on one side of the culture war could easily switch sides. I wrote a piece that came out this week about horny broach conservatism. This idea that theres the so called barstool conservative who just doesnt wanna be told what to do.

Its fascinating to me that some on the right have claimed those peoples being on their side in the culture war when this is a particular side thats pretty much like pornography is fine, having sex out of marriage is fine, abortion is fine, just dont tell anyone what to do. And so, the culture war can take on new applicants. The culture war can

take on new topics. It is always growing and changing, but it never has to end. And isnt that because culture is not a fixed thing? Right? So if culture is always changing, then theres always a new front in the war.

Exactly. And theres always something. Im reminded of when I was in high school. I was in high school in the early two thousand Oh. My freshman year, the second week of my freshman year of high school was nine eleven.

And so the culture war I remember was people being very mad at sixty six over their opposition to the Iraq War Sure. and over being mean to George Jebi Bush. But also the culture war was about the over sexualization of teen girls, which has had been an ongoing concern for pretty much forever. You you had kind of the last vestiges of the moral majority. I was very upset about this.

But I have been track now by how culture has shifted in a sense. And now you see some on the right complaining that teen girls arent hot enough anymore. And that people arent sexy enough anymore. For instance, certain celebrities arent hot enough to be a celebrity as or models arent thin enough to be models. And its interesting how as the culture shifts, people find new things to be mad about.

Its not that theyre wrong to be mad or right to be mad. Its that there is always something to be mad about. Culture shifts. Do you remember when people were extremely mad after the Taliban massacre, which it turns out had nothing to do with bullying or tranche coat mafia but had to do with the fact that these two kids were evil assholes. Thats okay to say.

Mhmm. But there was a lot of people who were like, Marilyn Manson did it. In violent video games. Like, some of these culture wars, you know, Im a world war two nerd. And so the way that I think about, like, ah, remember the battle of market garden.

I sometimes wonder if culture war veterans are like, remember the battle over video games. Like, when Grand Theft Auto came out, and people were convinced that that was going to cause Oh, yeah. undue suffering. And then we all moved on from whether caused undue suffering. So theres always a new front in the war.

A

new front in the Bulwark. And then also, I mean, one of the things we we wanted to do with these focus groups is get them to sort of define woke and talk about what that means. But it always has struck me that the conversation around wokeness is very old wine, new bottle. So theres both this idea that culture is always shifting, so theres always a new front in the war. But also, like, I grew up fighting a political correctness while you were still in high school and I was a young conservative working at a conservative think tank, political correctness was very much a thing that sort of consumed people.

And Donald Trump ran on political correctness.

Like, like,

people are acting like around the scientists, like, invented this woke culture war. But what he did was he put a new word around a phenomenon that the right has been mad about for

Right. As long as Ive been around. But a challenge, as I wrote this week, is that the right is always divided between whether or not they want to protect you from being told what to do by these evil PC people or whether they want to tell you what to do. Its also interesting how political correctness really was this moment. Because it became so all encompassing that how we talk about speech and how we talk about speech that we find impermissible it became very in vogue to rail against political correctness.

And then thered be the moment where the person on behalf you are railing says something thats one step over the line. And then you realize, hang on a second. Actually, I have something that I also object to. And I think that thats the challenge we have now with and well get into whatever woke means because Ive been struck by how some people think that woke has a very specific meaning, and I need those people to talk about how, why does woke mean theres a black person in a movie. Right?

I remember when the trailer for, I think, whatever the most recent Jurassic World movie came out, and someone was like, a a woke picture. And it was literally an image of Chris Pratt, the star of the film, with an African American actress. And everyone was like, whats whats broke about that? And I do think that thats one of the the fascinating things about the terminology is that now it seems it is a catchall term. Which I think only benefits some of the worst people in society because you can decry wokeness and people will think that you mean their woke up.

Totally. Like, you know, you mean something that you dont want your kids to see in school. But for some other people, it means black people appearing in a place that they shouldnt be? Yeah. So we were eager

to ask people to define this term. So we asked a couple of Republican groups the ways in which the country is becoming too, quote unquote, and we got a laundry list of complaints. Lets listen.

Wonkyism is treating people as members of groups. Were not treating people as individuals. Were defining people by the groups there in a slight gender politics. Its like identity politics. And I was just thinking about this the other day.

I was watching a TV show. I was watching survivor, actually. And survivor has a new rule where you have to have so many blacks, so many Asians, you have to have so many, what they call, minorities. Rather than the best candidates for the show. And we see this in movies all the time.

Youre not picking the best actors. Youre picking the black or the Asian or the gay person. So its this identity politics of forcing people to be thought of as members of groups rather than treating them as individuals. And thats what aggravates me the most. Is were getting away from thinking of normal and as people, and were just classifying them according to the group there.

And thats just I know, aggravates the heck out of me.

It seems like everybodys leaning more towards what you call the Hollywood Liberals and, you know, what they think is okay. And if you dare speak out and say you dont believe in something that they do, then theyre trashing you and It almost seems to me like, I still think that those Hollywood Liberal types are in the minority, but thats what you hear about ninety other time in the news or social media and sort of to make you believe, you know, I dont really know what Im trying to say. I dont know if that makes sense or not. But, yeah, that everybody has to believe this one way that that the very liberal believes or youre just really shouldnt have any beliefs at all? It means

the way theyre cramming the racism, homosexuality, transgender, and critical race stereotypes that way, you know, all of those things and they want everybody to believe because Im white. They want me, you know, oh, I racist because I was born white. And, you know, Im not Im not racist, but I dont like that cramp down my throat through every movie that you watch anymore, they gotta throw in all of their oh, I gotta try not to say these bad words. Homosexuals, mixed families. It has to be a white man, black woman, or black man, white woman.

You know, and, you know, the kids are really, you know, theres a black one, a white one, and something in between. You know, I Im just tired. As

a millennial, I feel like I see, like, what culture, like, all the time. I dont know. I feel like, you know, I Im, like, forced to accept other peoples beliefs no matter what, whether I agree with them or not, like, theyre just, like, the democrats seem to be just hammering it down her throat all the time, then, you know, you constantly have to agree with everything. I would say, like, oh, man. Like, transgender.

Nah. Like, you know, I dont know if Im supposed to be PC and youre not, but, like, its, like, its a random way through it. Im, like, I dont care if you are, but, like, I dont have to agree with them. Dont get mad at me if, like, I dont, you know. Its its my I use

I

work at a very local company, Starbucks. And I just try and do my job. Theyre all the time trying to push everything. And, you know, when they wanna

they

will, you know, give us a prize shirt to wear, you know, during pride week or month or whatever. And that is one shirt I chose not to wear. Nobody says anything to me. I just make that decision. Im not gonna preach to anybody.

I work with people that think differently than I, but we dont go there and, you know, just like with the vaccine thing, you know, you just I I was just gonna write it out I didnt lose my job. I think that was a question. But just those things that I think if I had my brothers, I probably wouldnt even get in the conversation. But if somebody asked, I probably would tell them my opinion. But

Again, I feel like were being silent. Okay. So theres some not great stuff in there, but theres a lot there. But, yeah, let me get into it. Yeah.

Let me Lets start with really the most important point. Do you watch survivor? I do not watch survivor. Okay. Alright.

I watch survivor religiously. I love survivor. And I gotta tell you, theres a lot of stuff thrown back in there, a lot of stuff that I dont agree with. Theres a couple of things where I think people have a point. And Im gonna take the most charitable view with folks and and and say, I was so I was watching survivor, and they have absolutely made an effort to make the casts more diverse.

Like, one of the things about survivor so writers like this comforting show where even though it sort of has evolved over time, its like very much the same in a lot of ways. And so Jeff Brooks is always the host is always saying, certain phrases all the time. And one of the things he does whenever people come in for challenges, he says, come on in guys. A few seasons back, he stops everybody. Lisa, does anybody object to me using the term, dies?

And a bunch of people say, no, and everybody is sort of shaking their head and then one person, one gentleman whos gay and I think had a trans partner fire call, trans husband objected, said I do object to the term, guys. And Jeff Probst said, okay, Im not gonna use this anymore. And he, like, changed that phrase that he used. And I rolled my eyes at this so hard and was like, are you serious? We cant say guys anymore.

And so theres a part of me. Theres a part of me that identifies with the annoyance that people feel over some of the evolving language that has been here too far harmless and suddenly they are being told that it is actually harmful. Because theyre a part of you that sort of understands like that piece of it or do you think these people are being very unreasonable.

I think I understand when people have a thing that they didnt even realize that they were kind of just used to. And then the thing changes in some way, and they are annoyed by it. I used to write about college football and the NFL. And it is interesting to me whenever there is a rule change, how youre like, oh, that sounds reasonable, and then you see it executed for the first time and youre like, well, thats the stupidest thing Ive ever seen in my entire life. For instance, there have been rule changes that are supposed to protect the quarterback.

Which, you know, weve learned so much about CTE and youve seen horrifying injuries happen. And youre like, that sounds great. Dont need another Trent Green situation in my life. And then you see some of the penalties people get for what looks like just gently brushing the quarterback. And youre like, well, this is ridiculous.

I mean, the challenge that we seem to have, whether its about survivor, which every time I am reminded that it is still going on, you cannot kill you cannot kill a CBS series. They will be airing blue bloods until the day after I die. But I I think that one of the challenges here, I mean, I I say this all the time about how to borrow what used to be on Pute MYRIDE, on MTV, If its like exhibit asked us, like, I heard you want a criminal justice reform. So I got you this weird survivor challenge language change. I feel as if a lot of this is because people and corporations specifically witnessed what has been happening over the last five to ten years.

And decided to react to it in the most small, ball way possible and didnt make anyone happy. No one has been bettered by changes to how people talk unsurvival. Well, and I think thats one of the things where I keep thinking about how we are asking culture to solve political problems. But no one wants to actually solve those political problems because its really hard and people make it mad at you. And then we ask culture to respond to them.

Or cultural entities to respond to them. And they are doing so in a way that feels to everyone overbearing and simultaneously insufficient. And so I I understand the annoyance, but at the same time, Im thinking like, this seems like something that happened because something else bigger didnt happen somewhere else. Well, maybe but, like, take the woman who theyre the last clipper. Shes talking

about the pride shirt. I totally am on her side. Like, I think it is would be so weird for an employer. I think it is weird. The way these companies are saying to people And you know what?

I got me, one of those gay marriages. I like the gay marriage. I like the gay. Its great. Its great.

But I am Its weird to ask people, like, the pride month, like, my Uber suddenly has, like, a rainbow tail on it. Like, for an entire Im, like, this feels like a strange way for our culture to

resign is just let us be married and exist. Yeah. Thats the thing. Is that, like, I think, again, it is an indication of corporations specifically attempting to respond with a cultural action when theyre not responding to, say, a political action, like Starbucks, for example, attempting to discourage people from unionizing or for folks, you know, youre working eighty hour weeks and working all in the weekend, but you got a pride shirt. Thats great.

And so it reminds me after the murders of George Floyd and Ahmed Arbery and Breonna Taylor, people on Instagram started doing this thing of, like, Im posting a black box that means Im listening on racial justice. And I was like, thats not doing anything. Civil asset forfeiture is not being stymied by your black box. Were not getting the elimination of qualified immunity because of your black box. Were Im just annoyed with you.

I was struck because you havent mentioned this yet, and I understand why. But I was struck by the woman who and this is always a fascinating tell to me. I am the product of a interracial couple. And I am always struck by how there is a way in which people talk about mixed race couples Im also in a mixed race relationship that they are a sort of plant by the media, that they arent real. That this isnt a real thing that happens, that no one is in an actual interracial relationship.

Despite the fact that the number of people in interracial relationships has been skyrocketing dramatically over the last thirty years. But its a fascinating tell that somehow that woman listed homosexuality, trans people, and mixed race relationships. I was like, oh, oh, I see. Oh, I see. There is something about how our culture works that we cannot tell in which direction our cultural mowers move, whether they go from the bottom up or from the top down.

And I think that one of our worst inclinations as people is to assume that the only reason people are gay or trans or in a mixed race relationship is because they saw it in a movie or because the cultural overlords made it look like it was okay. You know, I I think that the lovings who had to go to court in nineteen sixty seven and go to the Supreme Court to challenge the state of Virginia for their marriage, I am pretty sure they did not do so because they saw it in the movie. And Im always struck by this idea that you are having mixed race relationship shoved you down your throat. What? Im like, what?

So the jammed My parents are just like hanging

out. So the jammed down your throat piece is is its always that I know it is. So obviously, I view myself. Im at the perfect place in the culture. Like, I have the perfect position.

On culture. And I think everybody would agree that Sarah Longwell position is the perfect position on culture. I was in the bank yesterday, and there is a picture of a gay couple. Doing banking Yeah. there.

And there is kind of like a montage. Theres like a picture of a gay couple. And theres like a a black guy whos like a carpenter, I think. And its like a collection of people who do banking. And I think Yeah.

well, this would qualify to some of the people in this group by shoving it down their throats. Whereas Im like Right. these are people who bank and the bank would like to show that many different people bank here, lest you be one of those people, and wed like to see you reflected in it because we would like you to bank here. And so to me, that is a normal thing to do. Right.

Whereas I think forcing people to wear a pride shirt or the bank having a pride month I think that is like on the other side of things where Im like, I think that some of the things they identified as shoving down their throat are just hey, these people exist and were gonna like show you that they exist. Yeah. Whereas there are things that I might agree, feel like kind of shoving things down somebodys throat. And whats

hard to its hard to tease that out? Right. I remember that there was a Wells Fargo out a couple of years ago. Now keep in mind, Wells Fargo was one of the companies that really screwed over people during the great recession and signed people up for credit cards and then signed up for took a ton of peoples money, but they also had this ad that was about, like, a lesbian couple adopting a deaf child. And I was, like, dont dont bring no.

No. No. No. Dont bring this into this. And so I dont like using that kind of cultural swordsmanship.

The argument that you arent going to do real things to benefit people, but youll do this kind of performative action. I dont like that being included with theres a biracial person on my television and I dont like it because I dont think its real. I dont like the fact that that can all be called a Wokeness. And you could have someone who campaigned against quote unquote Wokeness, and someone would interpret that to mean I wont have to see by racial people on television.

Right. We played, like, a pretty long section there of of those groups, and I think its very accurate of what we hear all the time, but you also hear, like, its sort of inconsistent. Right? People have different ideas very much of what woke means to them. And I had a reporter ask me one time.

They were like, just do people use the word woke in focus groups? And I was like, not really. Like, we had to ask them sort of for the purposes of this, like, what does woke mean to you? For people to say it and they and they all had a variety of different opinions and theyre all sort of its some like substructure of a culture war thing that particularly annoys them. This is allowed to exist under this umbrella phrase rug for them.

Actually, Im gonna get into that a little more, but before you do, I wanna listen to the dams. Yeah. You know, and youll hear, I think, the disconnect between the way that the Republicans

were talking about, what woke is and what dem say woke is. The term woke means stay educated. And thats all it means. Stay educated. But when you hear and its typically used by white Republicans, when you hear dumb sand, the woke generation theyre talking about black people and no one wants to address it.

I believe we have to talk first of all We need to talk. We need to understand one another. And I say this because of my foundation. We have a sand. It says in order for humanity to survive.

We must care for one enough. So we have to take the time to listen to each other and under stand each other. Dont take a term that you know nothing about and run with it and use it in a way thats demoralizing or condescending to the next person.

Governor DeSantis is the governor of Florida, then he loves throwing that term out when he wants to disparage something, and it really angers me to hear it, have a negative connotation. I dont look at a negative way at all. I think awareness is important for change. So I dont like how he uses that term and has made it negative. I dont look at it as a negative thing.

Anytime you want to have a change, Its like to mock you, oh, youre so woke. Its like to cut that dialogue out because its done a very condescending way.

Yeah. Like, a staff is coming from, like, you know, like a Caucasian type person. Like, you need to be more woke. Like, I guess, its in their delivery, their tone of how theyre saying this. So if its, I guess, just depending on the situation, you know, and and how theyre just presenting it to you.

You know, it can come off as rude. You know? It can come off as kind of like a theyre kinda trying to be kinda controlling. Theyre trying to make you aware of something, but its kinda

like a privilege type thing. I would be proud to be called, whoa. Yeah. Do you think it would come out by the way? So the funny thing about this word is that the definitions vary widely.

And I think you know, for the Democratic group, they they didnt so much wanna define, Woke is define, like, the way it is hurled

at them. Right? Right. And I I think that this also goes to the thing about how a culture war cannot be won or lost is that, like, now you hear some of those Democrats being like, hell yeah. Whoa.

Right. Jesus was woke. Jesus was the original wokester. Exactly. And, you know, screw you through these people.

People arent like, oh, oh, Im so sorry about my willingness. I will repent. Like, no. Thats not how people react to things. Like, if you attempt to ban something, everybodys more interested in it.

If you attempt to decry something, in general, people become like very defensive of it. Then you ask more questions and people might be like, oh, well, I dont like this. I dont like that. But using it as a cudgel doesnt do what you think its going to do. It was notable.

Theres a number of people who hear it very

distinctly as a dog whistle. And it whats interesting to me about the term woke, thats what happens when it can mean so many things. On one hand, it is a racial dog. So on the other, for a lot of people its talking about like gender ideology or its talking about whats being taught in schools or its about how they want to be able to say a certain thing and they feel like they cant because its not politically correct. Or its about, you know, CRT or it is about race and its about, you know, a multiracial family on TV.

All of those things when you hear it, do you hear it as a racial dog whistle? Yes and no.

Because it is often used as a racial dog whistle because I think that that again when you use this term as an umbrella term, it becomes I now hear as a woman who doesnt want to see biracial people on television. You might have meant something entirely different, but all Im hearing is there are too many mixed race couples on my television and I dont like it. Because, you know, I remember when I was a kid, woke was what the guys in the barbershop would say about how you needed to be worried about the fluoride in the water because you have to stay woke. Like, they wont tell you about this. And so thats how I heard it.

And then you had to stay woke because, you know, the FBI wanted to kill Martin, which is, okay, sort of actually true. And so this idea, like, wokeness was this conceit that you need to stay aware and stay awake. You need to keep your eyes open to how the powers at Bulwark prepared to mistreat you and mistreat people like you, generally African Americans. And its interesting now to see it become this catch all term when it will always to many African Americans always sound like they were right all along. They should stay aware.

They should stay awake. To the way in which power structures can be wielded against them. So

one of the things that I use the Focus Groups force to help me think about messaging. And on this sort of idea that it is difficult for people to define woke and you learn a lot by sort of throwing out an open ended question about, like, what do you think is woke? You know, they were just saw this prominent anti woke activist Bethany Mandel She was asked on television. She has a book out about how, you know, woke up this is destroying children. And she was asked to define woke up on TV, and she kinda had like this brain free.

Because she couldnt conjure a definition. And the dams rather than getting sort of mad or I think that they should just constantly when people say, like, oh, youre woke. Whats that mean? What Tell me tell me what that means. Because I think that people will betray themselves pretty quickly in terms of what it what it means to them.

Yeah, I I think that asking people what they mean by something is often the best question any journalist can ask. I also think that it if I were doing democratic messaging, I would really focus on how this seems to be a actually from a lot of actual

Like, maybe the actual war that exists. Yeah.

The actual war or actual wars. I mean, many of the same people who decry Wokeness are currently proposing that we bomb targets in Mexico because apparently war is cool when its here. That sounds great. Or you think about so many of the issues people are struggling with in actual life and people attempting to tether that to some sort of wokeness issue, but not actually doing anything about it. Because again, culture wars should not be won and they cannot be lost.

Thats not the point. The point is not to do anything about any of these actual issues. The point is to have something to fight about on the Internet or on television. To the rest of our lives. Yeah.

So I would always say that, like, one, what do you mean? What does wealth just mean? And two, what does this have to do with any actual problem for people who

are on the Internet all the time. Right? Speaking of things that happen on the Internet all the time, I wanna talk about our second culture war buzzword, which is cancel culture. Now I know you hate it, but among our Republican groups, they had a very strong sense that Republicans exist in a world of fear with cancellation by the Liberals in their lives just around the corner at any moment. Lets listen.

The left, they cant really make their point as to why they believe that way. They just wanna scream in your face and tell you they dont believe

in the things that you do. I

More:
How The Culture Wars Weren't Won (with Jane Coaston) - The Bulwark

Is anybody paying attention? // The Observer – Observer Online

Over the past three weeks, I have traveled across the country like a madman.

I have pulled off my best impression of George Clooneys character in Up in the Air while navigating the TSA, overpriced airport coffees and travel delays. My extensive travel was for both personal and professional reasons alike, but job interviews and spring breaks dont just happen on their own. I flew and drove all around the country from South Bend to San Francisco to Chicago to New York City to Los Angeles and back again. As someone who isnt very fond of flying in the first place, it is safe to say that flying can be irritating. But with that being said, traveling back and forth between the coasts has a way of putting life into perspective. I interacted with dozens of intelligent folks in my travels which assured me of Americas standing as a country of great diversity and opportunity. While many of these interactions triumphed in our successes, conversations with new and old friends alike all pointed to the same conclusion.

America, and Americans in general, are focused on the wrong things. And we are so far behind in the race that we actually think we are winning. Let me explain.

A culture war can be defined as a conflict between social groups and the struggle for dominance of their values, beliefs and practices. It commonly refers to topics that generate social disagreement and polarization. Our current culture war has pitted cultural liberalism versus cultural socialism in the conflict of our time.

COVID-19. Trump. Russia. Biden. Our southern border. Abortion. 2024. Kanye West. Elon Musk. Twitter. Black Lives Matter. Inflation. The South China Sea. All topics that have ripped America apart at its seams. All topics that have pitted conservatives against liberals and secularists against traditionalists. They mark rally cries and screams of retreat as our political landscape continues to be dynamically transformed.

While several of these topics certainly demand our utmost attention and need for civil discourse, the backbone of our current culture war has been mostly predicated on nonsense. This ooze of buzzwords, self-professed gurus and pseudo-science has caused many Americans to miss the point. As a society, we are losing and our inability to solve varying social issues has been disguised by the cries of I want a four-day work and heres why!

You really need to look to see where the true faults lie, but once you do, its terrifying.

During my time in New York, several of my interactions took center stage as I explored and connected with people during my first time in the city. During my five-day stay in Midtown, a sense of urgency hung in the air like the smell of freshly coated paint. Around Manhattan and its surrounding boroughs, blue and white-collar workers alike rushed about with this air of urgency, not thinking twice while jaywalking or rushing to catch the subway. There is a truth that exists in New York Citys atmosphere of opportunity, because well, there is opportunity. Thanks to the world of high finance, the service industry, tourism, the port of New York and everything else in between, millions of jobs exist around New Yorks bustling metropolis that can certainly offer benefits for many.

But I have a question: In thirty years, who is going to work these jobs?

A projected decline in our American workforce can certainly be attributed to our perpetually declining birth rate. Numbers dont lie, and the numbers that surround our birth rate should make a culture war in any rational society irrelevant. In 2020, our American birth rate was 1.64 births per woman. For context, the global rate currently sits at 2.30 births per woman, placing Americas rate firmly behind the curve. Additionally, in the 15 years since the Great Recession, our birth rate has declined by 20 percent.

While other world superpowers have faced similar challenges, this is an issue we have simply refused to address in political discourse. And yes, I am aware that high levels of student debt and the high cost of raising children make raising children in 2023 a complicated endeavor. But do you want to know what will be more complicated? A sharp decrease in our workforce participation and an even sharper decrease in our economic productivity. If the birth rate in New England doesnt rise by about 0.9 percent, how do we expect to find the people to work jobs needed that will contribute to our society? Of course, this is a complicated argument. But since major players in our culture war continue to discuss Andrew Tate, the Oscars and every other immaterial topic, the future of our country goes unspoken.

During my time in California, I visited two cities struggling with a different issue: homelessness. Like other sunny cities, San Francisco and Los Angeles have struggled with helping the homeless for decades. Unlike other cities, their inability to help the homeless has come to define these cities. While enjoying my vanilla sweet cream cold brew in the sun last week in Los Angeles, I struck up a conversation with a dog walker who was passionate about this issue. She explained that the money has always been there to help, but any such resources have been squandered by political corruption or misuse.

It doesnt help that California is energy and water insecure, she added. Californias agriculture industry produces delicacies such as almonds and walnuts. 80 percent of the worlds almond crop is farmed in California, and the strain on the states water supply is ludicrous. 6,000 almond farmers in California use more water than the entire city of Sacramento which has a population of 500,000. While this industry and droughts have decimated the water supply, no one really seems to be talking about it.

So while culture wars have always been geared towards winning the hearts and minds of the populace, reality shows that we are a country of complex issues that are in dire need of fixing. But for the time being, as Tik Tok takes the center stage in reporting and rhetoric, we must ask ourselves: Who will have the guts to address and attack these issues?

Stephen Viz is a one-year MBA candidate and graduate of Holy Cross College. Hailing from Orland Park, Illinois, his columns are all trains of thought, and he can be found at either Decio Cafe or in Mendoza. He can be reached at [emailprotected] or on Twitter at @StephenViz.

The views expressed in this column are those of the author and not necessarily those of The Observer.

Read more from the original source:
Is anybody paying attention? // The Observer - Observer Online

Fighting the culture war for political gain | GARY COSBY JR. – Tuscaloosa Magazine

Former President Donald Trump appears to be in real trouble in New York and Georgia as investigations into his business practices and in his efforts to bully Georgia elections officials seem to have prosecutors on the brink of filing criminal charges against him.

Trump was already walking on thin ice within the Republican Party due to the fiasco of the mid-term elections that most certainly didnt go the way Republican officials had hoped. He has borne much of the blame for that poor performance and now, with revelations from the Dominion Voting Systems lawsuit against Fox News, it is apparent even the hosts on that network knew he was lying about the election.

Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis appears to be gaining an edge on Trump, assuming he declares for the presidency. The question Republican voters must confront is if the man who is at the forefront of the culture war is the right man to lead the party.

DeSantis recent push in Florida to ban books in schools, control school curriculums, and push for restrictions on health care for people with sexual identity issues might at first seem like a winning strategy with conservative voters. If you look beyond the surface, problems become quickly visible.

The problem for Republicans is that DeSantis message is playing to a diminishing segment of the population, that being older, very conservative voters, many of whom have deeply held religious beliefs. That is a core demographic of the conservative party and DeSantis is not wrong to play to that group. It is his choice of issues that needs questioning.

The danger in this strategy lies in the fact that this voting group cant elect him president. He will need moderately conservative voters and not a few of those all-important swing voters who do not identify as either conservative or liberal. They are the ones he must convince that he is the man for the job.

This leaves one wondering if the strategy of belligerence he is pursuing in Florida is going to play well nationally and particularly with that group of voters. The whole issue of transgender and gender identity issues is a relatively small issue, but it carries with it large ramifications.

Only a tiny percentage of the population has gender identity issues. This means the DeSantis is making a mountain out of a molehill for potential political gain. The same thing goes with the attempt to ban books in the public schools. I believe many of the books targeted deal with sexual identity issues. Again, we are talking about a tiny percentage of the books in the school libraries and a tiny percentage of people who might read them.

More:How sinful is Alabama? Survey has surprising answer | GARY COSBY JR.

This is purely opinion, but I think that conservative parents who back this sort of book-banning fear that their child might read the books and then develop a desire to become homosexual or transgender or have some kind of sexual identity crisis. That is an unrealistic fear, but it is a fear that DeSantis is leveraging for political gain.

Think about it for a moment. I dont like the first-person shooter games that most kids play online. Nevertheless, though it might desensitize them to violence, simply playing a video game or reading a book about guns doesnt transform kids into mass murderers. In like manner, the likelihood of kids reading books about trans people isnt going to produce a tidal wave of sex changes in Floridas youth.

These issues are but a microcosm of the overall culture war that is being fought on Americas airwaves and on the internet all the time. Fears of transgender people somehow mucking up the system are mostly just that; fear. It is largely a non-issue that is being turned into an issue because media providers know controversy sells and this is an excellent controversy to stir up because it hits at parents fears.

The culture war is mostly about fear-mongering to begin with. If you dont recognize that, you have lost the battle. Do you remember the transgender bathroom issue that was raised during the last few years of Barack Obamas presidency? Yeah, how many trans people have you run across in public bathrooms? It wasnt a problem then and it isnt a problem now. In fact, if you have been in a public restroom with a trans person, you likely didnt even know it.

The problem with the conservative approach to the culture wars is that we are pushing away the next generation of voters to play to the fears of older voters today. The older voters wont be around in a few years, but those who are young today will be in the arms of the Democrats and will be essentially a lost generation to Republicans. Short-sighted politicians of today are losing tomorrows elections. Since the culture war is mostly about political posturing rather than true conviction, it seems to me that it makes a great deal of sense to position conservatism to make future gains rather than give up the future over what is essentially a non-issue.

Gary Cosby Jr. is the photo editor of The Tuscaloosa News. Readers can email him at gary.cosby@tuscaloosanews.com.

Follow this link:
Fighting the culture war for political gain | GARY COSBY JR. - Tuscaloosa Magazine