An unrated player is a puzzle waiting to be solved. On the one hand they are oftenespecially at the scholastic levelbeginners that are just learning the basics of the royal game. But sometimes they are not beginners. They are individualsusually adults that have been essaying games for years with family and friends or with strangers at beaches or public parks. Those wood pushers typically are not weak. Then there are players that are rated in far-off lands that are now competing in tournaments here in the U.S.A. In their first US Chess event they have no rating; they are Unrated. This mix of abilities is the puzzle that needs solving in events that offer prize money. Scholastic unrateds are an entirely different discussion for a future column.
Our rulebook does address the unrated prize fund puzzle. They can only claim top place prizes or designated unrated prizes. Any variations from these regulations needs to be advertised by the organizer.
The rules briefly mention that unrateds can have prizes designated just for themTop Unrated = $50 is one example. The rulebook does mention this idea but also says that it is not advised; however, many organizers do use this plan and advertise it
The upside is that unrated wood pushers, no matter what their score or playing strength, can only take home gold specified just for them. They cant claim any dollars designated for rated wood pushers.
The downside is that if there is only one unrated in an event, they automatically get that prize. It often makes them happy and encourages them to come back again sporting a provisional rating.
The TD can assign a rating to an unrated player. This method addresses the unrated prize puzzle solution without any advanced publicity. There are a series of steps in the rulebook outlining how to make this happen. The procedure involves finding proof of an unrateds ability via foreign rating lists, FIDE rating lists, club won-loss records, etc. A rating for that playertypically higher than what is discovered in that research is then assigned on the wallchart. That assigned rating is good only at that tournament for pairings and prizes. It allows an unrated player to compete for all the money that their assigned rating qualifies them fortop prizes, class prizes, under prizes, etc.
In my humble opinion, it seems risky to assign a rating below 2200 to any unrated player with gray area playing strength credentials.
Limiting the amount of money an unrated can win is yet another method not encouraged by the chess law givers. It is, however, a fairly common advertised practice for solving the unrated prize puzzle.
The upside is that it prevents strong non-rated players, that have no US Chess rating, from claiming prizes aimed at rated chess warriors.
The downside is that it is messy, messy, messy. Especially if the cap on unrated winnings is lower than the rated player prize that their score would otherwise qualify them for?
Check out this example: In a five round event, first place is $100 and second place is $50. The unrated prize cap is $25. The unrated scores a perfect 5-0, the only player to do so. Now, where does the rest of the goldyou know, that extra $75go? The rules tell us where to distribute those fundsnot how to distribute them.
Here is one of many ways to shift that left-over lootdownward. That $75, in this example, could go to the second-place finisher. Since the second-place finisher cant claim both the leftover loot ($75) and second place money ($50), where does that extra money ($50) filter down to? In this instance the organizer can create a new (unadvertised) third-place prize of $50.
Another variationusing this exampleis to give the unrated their $25, the second-place claimant gets their $50, then create two extra unadvertised prizes from that leftover $75. One of many possibilities is to hand out $45 as a new (unadvertised) third place prize plus $30 as a new (unadvertised) fourth place prize.
These two methods of distributing leftover funds are only a couple of many. And lets not even get started on what to do with the leftover money when ties are involved with players that have prize capsthat is even messier.
What have you seen in practice?
Tim Just is a National Tournament Director, FIDE National Arbiter, and editor of the 5th, 6th, and 7th editions of the US Chess Rulebook. He is also the author of My Opponent is Eating a Doughnut & Just Law, which are both available from US Chess Sales and Amazon/Kindle. Additionally, Tim recently revised The Guide To Scholastic Chess, a guide created to help teachers and scholastic organizers who wish to begin, improve, or strengthen their school chess program. Tim is also a member of the US Chess Rules Committee. His new column, exclusive to US Chess, Just the Rules will help clarify potentially confusing regulations.
Originally posted here:
Just the Rules: The Unrated Prize Puzzle | US Chess.org - uschess.org