Archive for the ‘Chess’ Category

Chess.com Announces Collegiate Chess League 2022-2023 Season

Chess.com is proud to announce that the Collegiate Chess League is returning for the 2022-2023 academic year in partnership with NACE Starleague, the largest collegiate esports league in North America. The Fall 2022 and Spring 2023 seasons will feature a combined $50,000 prize pool and give college students of all skill levels the opportunity to participate and represent their schools in the ultimate chess competition for college students.

The Fall 2022 Season action kicks off on September 24 with a $20,000 prize fund, while the Spring 2023 Season will have a $30,000 prize fund and a different format.

In the Fall season, players will channel their school spirit and compete in a series of rapid games to defeat rival colleges. Unlike previous editions, this event will feature players competing individually to represent their clubs. In previous editions, fans could enjoy the brilliant chess brought by grandmasters like Awonder Liang, Nicolas Checa, Grigoriy Oparin, Andrew Tang, and more. Competitors will be ready to bring their A-games once more and bust out their best moves to overcome their rivals to take the gold to their clubs.

Fans will also appreciate the live broadcasts on CCL's Twitch channel, with not-so-beautiful but equally enjoyable time scrambles, blunders, throws, and drama that only the Collegiate Chess League can provide:

Registration for the event kicks off on August 1. Fill out the interest form below if you're a college player and would like to get an update when registration opens.

College students will also be able to play in the Spring Season, which features the team format CCL fans and players are used to. The Spring 2023 season will feature a $30,000 prize fund and the best college chess action, so stay tuned for future announcements! Head over to the event's official website for more information and details about how to register for the upcoming CCL seasons. You can also join the official discord server to stay up to date on all future announcements and to connect with other students and clubs in the league.

Read more:
Chess.com Announces Collegiate Chess League 2022-2023 Season

Why The Match Of The Century Almost Didn’t Happen – Chess.com

Today 50 years ago, on July 1, 1972, the opening ceremony of the world chess championship match between reigning world champion Boris Spassky and his challenger GM Bobby Fischer took place in Reykjavik, Iceland.

Fischer, however, wasn't there, and the first game, scheduled for the next day, was only played 10 days later. The Match of the Century, which captivated the minds of millions of chess fans and which caused a peak in popularity of the game against the backdrop of the Cold War, had a most turbulent run-up.

Fischer was already a star in the chess world, but his resounding victories against GMs Mark Taimanov (6-0), Bent Larsen (6-0), and Tigran Petrosian (6.5-2.5) in the 1971 Candidates matches had made him famous among the non-chess-playing public. Mainstream media were writing regularly about him, and even President Nixon wrote him a letter saying that the country was behind him.

By the end of 1971, a record amount of 15 bids had come in to host the match: from Amsterdam, Athens, Belgrade, Bled, Bogota, Buenos Aires, Chicago, Dortmund, Montreal, Paris, Reykjavik, Rio de Janeiro, Sarajevo, Zagreb, and Zurich. According to GM Max Euwe, the former world champion who was the FIDE President at the time, the highest bids were Belgrade ($152,000 prize fund), Reykjavik ($125,000), and Sarajevo ($120,000), all about 10 times any previous purse for a world title match.

In The Match Of All Time, which was recently translated into English, Gudmundur Thorarinsson, the Icelandic Chess Federation President at the time, wrote that he didn't have much faith in the match coming to Iceland:

"As an example of how little interest I had in the matter, believing our work on the bid to be a total waste of time, I failed to mail the bid to the offices of FIDE on time. I called Freysteinn Thorbergsson and asked him to go to Amsterdam to deliver our bid in person at the FIDE headquarters where the bids would be opened. This he did very competently."

According to Life reporter Brad Darrach, who collected his articles into the brilliant book Bobby Fischer vs. the Rest of the World, Thorarinsson had initially planned on a $25,000 prize fund, but a week before the bidding closed he read a false report in a German chess magazine that Iceland had made a bid of $100,000. Assuming other bidders would try to beat that, he set the offer at $125,000. Thorarinsson makes no mention of this in his own book.

Furthermore, the Reykjavik bid also mentioned that on top of the prize fund, the players would receive 30 percent of the revenue from TV/film rights. Finding himself in fresh territory, 70-year-old Euwe suggested dividing the revenue equally among players, the organizing federations, and FIDE, and sent a telegram to all bidding federations about this. Belgrade was not happy and declared that their bid was now uncertain. Euwe traveled to Belgrade on January 15, 1972, and offered $7,000 to accept their terms if they were to win the bid.

Meanwhile, he had asked both Fischer and Spassky to submit their host city preferences by January 31, 1972. Spassky nominated Reykjavik, Amsterdam, Dortmund, and Paris while Fischer nominated Belgrade, Sarajevo, Buenos Aires, and Montreal.

Given no overlap on the players nominations, FIDE gave the players until February 10 to agree on a host city, otherwise Euwe would make the decision himself. Ed Edmondson, the President of the U.S. Chess Federation and long-time manager of Fischer, had traveled to Moscow and had agreed on Reykjavik, under the condition that Fischer would agree.

Euwe was relieved to receive a telegram from Moscow saying the parties had agreed on Reykjavik. However, soon came a telegram from New York: Fischer did not agree! He called Reykjavik too small and primitive, and "a stupid place for the match," a remark that required some band-aid at diplomatic levels. Meanwhile, all this had angered the Russian chess officials, who accused the FIDE President of breaching the regulationswhich wouldn't be the last time.

The highly pragmatic Euwe then came up with a remarkable idea: he asked the two highest bidders to split the match. Belgrade accepted on the condition that they would get the first half, while Reykjavik wanted to secure a reduction of the costs in case the match wouldn't last the full 24 games.

Fischer agreed, and Edmondson said: "Euwe made a Solomonic decision. He sawed the baby in half."

Not everyone liked Euwe's decision. FIDE Secretary H.J. Slavekoorde, who was also the chairman of the FIDE rules committee, resigned from his post in protest. The Russian Chess Federation also protested, noting that Belgrade has a very warm climate in the summerquite different from what their player was used toand again accused the FIDE President of breaching regulations. Euwe explained his decisions at an already planned FIDE Bureau meeting on March 2-3 in Moscow. The Russian federation got little support and reluctantly withdrew their protest.

After a 40-hour meeting that started on March 18 in Amsterdam, in which FIDE and the Icelandic and Yugoslav delegations were present, the split-city variant was agreed upon. The new prize fund would be $138,000 (the average of both bids) and a scheme of payments was created for the different amount of games the match could last so that Belgrade would carry the bigger burden in case the match lasted for fewer than 24 games.

Euwe himself could not attend due to a goodwill trip to Australia and East Asia. He learned on March 20 in Sydney that the parties had agreed and a contract was signed by GM Efim Geller on behalf of Spassky and by Edmondson on behalf of Fischer.

Two days later, Fischer once again did not accept Edmondson's signature and demanded from both Belgrade and Reykjavik a change in the conditions, whereby the players should be financially profiting from a potential revenue, and emphasized that otherwise, he wouldn't play. As it turned out, Edmondson did not have the mandate to speak on Fischer's behalf anymore, and the two would soon stop working together.

This time, Euwe stood firm and gave the U.S. Chess Federation a deadline of April 4 to accept the terms of the match. Soon, a telegram came back saying Fischer accepted, and everything seemed in order.

However, by then Belgrade, backed by a Yugoslav bank, had lost its patience and demanded a $35,000 deposit from both the U.S. and Russian chess federations. When the Americans declined, Belgrade pulled out on April 11.

The Icelandic Chess Federation then offered to host the full match, under the condition that the day of the first game would be postponed from June 22 to July 2, which was accepted. In a match book co-written by GM Jan Timman, Euwe acknowledged that he breached the regulations a little there, which stipulated that the match could not start later than July 1. He felt he had good reasons: Fischer couldn't play on a Saturday anyway due to his religious beliefs, and FIDE had already decided that this July 1 date should probably be removed altogether because it would rule out a lot of cities with a warm climate.

Moscow agreed to a whole match in Reykjavik, the U.S. initially not, but in a second telegram on May 6, it was stated that "Fischer agrees but under protest." Euwe writes that, after the match, he knew what "under protest" meant: "I will play but I will use every opportunity to protest against whom and whatever."

Thorarinsson, in The Match of All Time:

"[That] the World Chess Championship match put Iceland on the map is a generally held view. I firmly believe it was Spassky who put Iceland on the map, as Iceland was his first choice, without his preference we would never have been considered at all."

Fischer's biographer Frank Brady suggested that it was Fischer's Icelandic acquaintance Freysteinn Thorbergsson who convinced him to play in Iceland by pointing out the political significance. A rabid anti-Communist, Thorbergsson had visited Fischer in the U.S. and later wrote in an essay that a Fischer victory would "strike at the uplifted propaganda fists of the Communists."

Those were the days of the Cold War, with the West and the Communists as two separate, dominating ideologies. A chess match with representatives from both sides, being held exactly in the middle of America and Russia couldn't be more symbolic, a point that wasn't missed by the media.

The location of the match was finally decided, but the complications didn't end there. In the last three months before the start, Fischer caused more stir, mostly about the financial arrangements. The prize fund was $125,000 (about $800,000 in today's value) with 62.5 percent going to the winner and 37.5 percent to the loser, besides the aforementioned 30 percent of all television and film rights.

On top of this, Fischer now demanded 30 percent of the sold tickets as well, and said Spassky should also receive part of it. The organizers did not accept this new demand.

We have reached early June 1972, when Fischer was spending time in Santa Monica, California. To get to Iceland, he first needed to get to New York.

On Sunday, June 25, the day Fischer was originally scheduled to arrive in Reykjavik, his good friend IM Anthony Saidy called him and said that he would be flying east on Tuesday to see his father, and he asked if Bobby would like to come along. Fischer agreed, and Saidy would later say that he had a strange feeling that if he hadn't called, Fischer would still be there.

A few days later, on June 29, Fischer intended to board a flight at John F. Kennedy Airport, and his luggage was already loaded but, as witnessed by hundreds of members of the press who awaited him, he fled the terminal and missed the flight. He would return and spend the next few days at Saidy's parents' house in Douglaston, Queens, chased by reporters there as well.

In Reykjavik, where Spassky had arrived with his entourage on June 21, some two hundred journalists from at least 30 countries were starting to wonder if they had come for nothing. Many of them were "red-eyed from rolling out of bed to meet the 5 a.m. plane from New York" each morning, wrote Darrach. "Not seeing Bobby walk off that DC-8 was getting to be an unpleasant habit."

Around that point, the New York filmmaker Chester Fox, who had the filming rights and was going to make a documentary, was asked by a reporter if he was concerned about the outcome of his investment. Fox replied: "I haven't noticed if I'm concerned. I've been trying too hard not to [soil] my pants."

Euwe himself arrived in Iceland on Saturday, July 1, the day of the opening ceremony. In the morning, Spassky could be seen playing tennis with one of his seconds, IM Iivo Nei, on a court close to the Saga Hotel. When a reporter asked the world champion if he thought his opponent would come, Spassky replied: "No, I don't think Robert James will come."

Meanwhile, in Douglaston, attempts to convince Fischer of playing were made by Edmondson, Saidy, and GM William Lombardy, a talented grandmaster-turned-priest and friend of Fischer's, who would end up joining as Fischer's second.

The opening ceremony was held according to schedule on the evening of July 1 in the 500-seat Icelandic National Theater. Present were the Icelandic President and his wife, ambassadors, FIDE officials, reporters, and other guests. One seat in the front row, however, remained empty.

With Fischer not being present, the chief arbiter of the match GM Lothar Schmid suggested postponing the drawing of colors to the next day. After all, the challenger could be on the overnight flight to arrive for the first game in time...

However, the next day a telegram from Saidy arrived, saying that Fischer couldn't play due to illness. It's important to note that the match regulations allowed for a postponement of up to six days only in case of illness, but a medical examination had to be delivered.

What to do? Await for a copy of the medical examination via telegram? But shouldn't the document come from the match doctor in Iceland, now that the match was underway? But... was it already underway?

These questions were addressed in a meeting with all parties, which Euwe had called for. The arbiter and the Russians argued that a match was underway when it has been opened at the opening ceremony, but Euwe wondered if "speeches and a violin" were enough. The Americans claimed that a match is only underway after a drawing of colors has been performed.

Meanwhile, Fischer himself told the New York Daily News on July 3: "I am not ill. I want my financial demands to be met, otherwise I don't play."

In another moment of pragmatism, Euwe then suggested a compromise: to postpone the match by two days. The Russians asked for time to deliberate and after lunch they said they weren't enthusiastic but wouldn't protest it. Euwe later wrote: "I did not leave any doubt that in case the Russians wished so, I would disqualify Fischer instantly, but they refused to go into history as The Destroyers of the Match of the Century."

Meanwhile, the Russian press agency TASS attacked the FIDE President, writing: "Euwe is pretending to play a game of chess. Instead of making the decision himself to disqualify Fischer, as the regulations stipulate, he tries to pass the matter onto the shoulders of the world champion."

Euwe is pretending to play a game of chess. TASS, Russian Press Agency

Euwe had more talks with all FIDE officials present in Reykjavik and then made the decision official: a postponement for two days, with the drawing of colors now scheduled for July 4 at 11:45 a.m. and the game starting at 5 p.m. The Soviets were furious and filed an official protest after all, and Euwe acknowledged that they were in their right to do so.

On July 3, Fischer's solicitor Paul Marshall received a phone call that changed everything.

James Derrick Slater was a successful British investment banker and chess lover who had developed the habit of giving away anonymous prizes to chess events and talented players. After reading about Fischer's financial demands in the newspaper and the match being in danger of collapsing, Slater called Leonard Bardenback then the chess correspondent for the Evening Standard, these days, at 92, still writing for The Guardian and told him that he wanted to donate $125,000, thus doubling the prize fund to $250,000.

Together with a BBC producer, Barden called Marshall to tell the news, whereupon Marshall wanted to hear it from Slater himself. About 10 minutes later, Slater called to confirm, and agreed with Marshall to deliver the message to Fischer: "Now come out and play, chicken!" Fischer was obviously thrilled when he heard the news.

Whether it was decisive or not is unclear, but there was another famous phone call, on the same day. It was none other than Henry Kissinger, Nixon's national security advisor and future secretary of state, on the line.

His opening sentence is usually cited as "This is the worst chess player in the world calling the best chess player in the world," although Darrach has it starting as "This is one of the two worst chess players..." Kissinger made the point that the match was important for the prestige of the United States and that Fischer should go and play.

That evening, Fischer finally boarded a plane to Reykjavik.

Arriving at 7 a.m. on the morning of July 4 at Keflavik airport, Fischer got a police escort to the Icelandic capital. Upon arrival, he decided that sleep was more important than attending the drawing of colors. He signed a letter that Lombardy would represent him, and closed his bedroom door.

When Lombardy stated that Fischer was too tired to attend the drawing, Spassky snapped. Before, it had been the Russian Chess Federation officials who had protested about all the wrong-doings, but now, finally, the world champion himself had enough. He quickly left the Hotel Esja, but told a reporter: "I still want to play, but I will decide when!"

Soon came an official statement from Spassky (or was it from Moscow?), in which he wrote: "If there now is to be any hope for conducting the match, Fischer must be subjected to just penalty. Only after that I can return to the question of whether it is possible to conduct the match."

If there now is to be any hope for conducting the match, Fischer must be subjected to just penalty. Spassky

As it turned out, the "penalty" the Soviets requested was Fischer forfeiting the first game, as Geller told a member of the press, somewhat mysteriously adding that Spassky "wouldn't accept that forfeit." (Little did they know, that a forfeit would happen in this match after all...)

In a meeting with all the parties, the Soviets made three further demands: that Fischer would apologize, that Euwe would condemn the behavior of the challenger, and that Euwe would acknowledge that the two-day postponement violated FIDE regulations.

An emotional Euwe instantly got a piece of paper on which he condemned Fischer's behavior, and admitted that he had violated FIDE regulations and that FIDE regulations and match agreements would be strictly observed in the future. FIDE later telegrammed the Russian Chess Federation that the demand for a forfeit would not be granted.

Asking Fischer to apologize was quite something, but he did. He wrote an apology, initially ending with the proposal that the players would give up all prize money and play the match for the sake of chess alone. He wanted to let everyone know he wasn't greedy. In the final version of the letter, that phrase was left out.

While the mainstream media accused Fischer of greed, there were probably other reasons for him to make life so difficult for FIDE, Spassky, and the organizers. One of these reasons might sound strange: fear.

GM Nikolai Krogius, who had written a book about psychology in chess and who was part of Spassky's delegation, wrote: "It is a fact that when you see Fischer at the chessboard, all talk about uncertainty or lack of confidence seems absurd. But before an important contest he appears to be a prey to doubts and vacillation."

GM Larry Evans had a similar view: "Since Bobby has become closer to the top in chess, in his heart a previously uncharacteristic fear of defeat has taken root. In Reykjavik he was able to overcome his fear, only after he sensed that he had upset Spassky's emotional equilibrium."

Another reason was more a principled one. Fischer simply didn't like the idea that others, especially the Icelandic organizers, would make more money on the match than him. He was the star, he was the Muhammad Ali of this match, and he knew it.

In a letter that was delivered to Spassky's hotel room, Fischer apologized for his "disrespectful behavior" of not attending the opening ceremony. "I simply got carried away by my petty dispute over money with the Icelandic chess organizers," he wrote, and also apologized to Euwe and "the thousands of chess fans around the world." Fischer then urged Spassky to not continue demanding the forfeit of the first game.

I simply got carried away by my petty dispute over money with the Icelandic chess organizers. Fischer

On the same day, Spassky was called by a high-ranked Soviet official named Sergei Pavlov, who said it was now better for the Russian team to come back to Russia. Spassky, who had consistently refused to join the Communist Party, politely refused.

Spassky appreciated Fischer's letter and said that he couldn't play until Tuesday (July 11) but was eager for the drawing of lots. That drawing of colors eventually took place on Friday evening, July 6, at Laugardalsholl, the playing hall. Fischer arrived 22 minutes late, but it was a relief to anyone present that the American finally showed himself.

Spassky jokingly squeezed Fischer's left bicep, as if they were to play a boxing match, and the result of the drawing was that the world champion would start with the white pieces. While discussing the match regulations, Spassky dropped the demand for the forfeit, and Fischer accepted the request to postpone the first game for a few more days.

Five days later, the match would finally begin. The run-up to the most famous chess battle in history had been a hard-fought battle in itself.

See the article here:
Why The Match Of The Century Almost Didn't Happen - Chess.com

Chess: England win three world titles while Ian Nepomniachtchi nears victory – The Guardian

Englands over-50 and over-65 teams completed a historic golden double on Wednesday in the world senior championships at Acqui Terme, Italy, Both led their tournaments from start to finish, overcame some dubious positions en route, and were virtually sure of victory with a round to spare.

The seven-times British champion Michael Adams turned 50 last November, and the Cornishman played a key role by winning an apparently drawn knight ending in the decisive match against the United States, then outplaying Italys Alberto David in a seemingly level rook ending. More England games can be viewed in the games section of chess-results.com. Nigel Shorts ninth and final round win against Canada is a model of how to play with rook and pawn against bishop and knight.

Adams and Short stand out as Englands two all-time best players, eclipsing the achievements of the 19th century icons Howard Staunton and Joseph Blackburne in a less competitive era. Their elite GM skills made the difference in the close struggle with the US silver medal team, composed of Soviet trained ex-Russians.

England over-65s, with seven wins, one draw, and a final-round loss to the bronze medallists, Israel, were boosted by their top boards, John Nunn and Paul Littlewood. Nunn is eminent as a chess writer, player, publisher and world problem solving champion, while Littlewood is a former British champion.

Six England players won individual golds: four in the 50+ (Adams 7/8, Short 6.5/9, Mark Hebden 6.5/8, Keith Arkell 4/5) plus the top two in the 65+ (Nunn 6.5/8, Littlewood 6.5/9).

There was even a third English team gold. England women 50+, fielding Sheila Jackson, Ingrid Lauterbach, Natasha Regan and Petra Fink-Nunn, were awarded a world title despite being the only team in their category. Seeded 17th out of 23, they finished 13th, defeated male opponents from Norway and Poland, and were ahead of two of the four England mens teams. Jackson was part of the England team which won silver at the Haifa Olympiad in 1976.

The outcome provided consolation after painful defeats in major finals of long ago. Nigel Short famously lost to Garry Kasparov in 1993, Michael Adams was beaten in the Fide world final in 2004, while Keith Arkell missed the 2014 World Senior title on tiebreak.

Acqui Terme proved an evocative and nostalgic occasion, one of the last hurrahs for a gifted generation. It was a reminder of the brilliant era of the 1970s and 1980s when England fielded the second strongest team on the planet, achieving silver medals in three successive Olympiads (1984, 1986, 1988) behind Soviet gold.

Ian Nepomniachtchi is on the brink of becoming Magnus Carlsens world title challenger for the second time within six months. The 31-year-old Russian, playing under a neutral Fide (International Chess Federation) flag, is unbeaten after 12 of the 14 rounds of the eight-player Candidates in Madrid, and needs just a single draw in his final two games.

Nepomniachtchi will be only the fifth player in Candidates history to win this competitive event twice in succession, following Vasily Smyslov, Boris Spassky, Viktor Korchnoi, and Anatoly Karpov.

However, the formality of the Muscovites victory in Sundays 13th and penultimate round will probably be just the start of his problems. Carlsen has said that he is unlikely to defend his crown against a player from his own generation, and that he may be ready to abdicate the title while remaining the clear No 1 in the rankings.

The tedium and grinding work involved in two months technical preparation followed by a month of the match itself is the major deterrent, and the 2m prize fund carries little incentive for someone who is already a multi-millionaire.

Fide rules state that if the reigning champion defaults, there will be a title match between the top two in the Candidates. Inconsistent play by all Nepomniachtchis rivals has led to a situation where second place and a potential championship series is still a four-way race.

Leading scores after 12 rounds are Nepomniachtchi 8.5, Ding Liren (China) and Hikaru Nakamura (US) 6.5, Fabiano Caruana (US) and Teimour Radjabov (Azerbaijan) 6.

Caruana, who was clear second for several rounds, cracked with two defeats. Ding, who failed to win a game in the first eight rounds and then won three in a row, lost to Radjabov in round 12. Round 13 pairings include Radjabov v Caruana, round 14 features Ding v Nakamura. If it comes to Sonneborn-Berger tie-breaks, results against the tournament leader will be significant, and in that case Dings round one loss will count against him.

Nepomniachtchis strategy at Madrid has been a combative first half of the tournament, where three of his four wins were scored by direct attacks down the h-file against castled kings, then to dig in for the second half by keeping it simple and being satisfied with half a point.

This approach has worked amazingly well, aided considerably by his opponents. Ding arrived jet-lagged for round one, while Richard Rapport, faced with a forced draw from the Russian prep, avoided it with a losing alternative. Nakamura failed to drive home his big opening advantage, while Caruana chose to draw his first game with Nepomniachtchi from a superior position, then again missed chances created by his good opening prep.

Firouzja prepared for his round 11 encounter against the leader by playing a 250-game match of hyper-bullet (30 seconds each for the entire game) against the New York Times columnist Daniel Naroditsky, an action greeted with incredulity by Nepomniachtchis rivals.

Magnus Carlsen is expected to be in Madrid to watch the decisive final two rounds. The No 1 has also confirmed that next week he will travel to Las Vegas for the World Series of Poker. Earlier this year he finished 25th out of 1050 in the Norwegian Poker Championship. It seems that card and bidding skills have taken over as his offboard interest from Fantasy Premier League, where he briefly led the world in December 2019.

3822 1 Nb7! Resigns. If 1...Bxb7 2 Qxe7 pins and wins the bishop, as does 1...Rxd5 2 Qxe7 h6 3 Qe8+ and 4 Qxc8. But the real idea kudos if you spotted it is the queen sacrifice 1...Nxd5 2 Nxd8! Nxb4 3 Re8 mate.

Read the original post:
Chess: England win three world titles while Ian Nepomniachtchi nears victory - The Guardian

The first-ever Chess Olympiad Torch Relay travels through prominent locations of Nagpur, Pune – ThePrint

Mumbai (Maharashtra) [India], July 2 (ANI): The first-ever Chess Olympiad Torch Relay reached Maharashtra today and travelled through prominent locations of Nagpur and Pune.

The Torch will reach Mumbai from where it will depart from Maharashtra to Goa on Sunday.

As India is celebrating its 75th year of independence, the Chess Olympiad torch is being taken to 75 cities of the country before reaching Chennai, the host city of the 44th FIDE Chess Olympiad from July 28 August 10, 2022.

The Torch relay reached Nagpurs famous Zero Mile, the geographical centre-point of India, from Daman at 6 a.m. Grand Masters Raunak Sadhwani, Divya Deshmukh and Sankalp Gupta received the Torch. NCC Cadets of the 20th Maharashtra Batallion, Nehru Yuva Kendra and District Sports officials and other sports enthusiasts gave a grand welcome to the Chess Olympiad Torch Relay.

Later, the Grand Masters took the Torch forward in an open jeep to various locations. The rally passed through the main square of Nagpur city through Sanvidhan Chowk, All India Radio, Maharaj Bagh, Law College, Ravi Nagar Chowk, Wadi T Point, Hingana Link Road or GH Raisoni Institute of Engineering and Technology, Shraddha Park, near MIDC Police Station, Chhatrapati Square and Hingana Wadi Link Road. Later, the Torch was taken to Dr Babasaheb Ambedkar International Airport, Nagpur at around 8 AM for its onward journey.

Grand Masters Isha Karwade and Abhijit Kunte, Representatives of Maharashtra Chess Association, Officials of Department of Sports received the Torch at the Pune Airport.

The Torch was carried by the Grand Masters to Amanora Township in Hadapsar at around 12 noon where it was greeted with a grand reception. State Sports Commissioner Om Prakash Bakoria, Commissioner, Pune Metropolitan Region Development Authority, Dr Suhas Divase, Pune Municipal Commissioner Vikram Kumar and office bearers of Maharashtra Chess Association were also present on the occasion.

After the grand reception the flame was taken on a road journey to prominent locations in the city, including the historically significant Shaniwarwada, before commencing its road journey towards Mumbai.

The Torch is expected to reach Mumbai at 6:30 p.m where it will be received by Grandmaster Pravin Thipsay. Grandmasters Abhijit Kunte and Soumya Swaminathan will also be present. A grand reception for the Torch has been organised at Wankhede Club at around 7 p.m.

India has been the first-ever country to start the Chess Olympiad Torch Relay as per the Olympic tradition. Prime Minister Narendra Modi launched the historic torch relay at Indira Gandhi Stadium, New Delhi on June 19, 2022 and handed it over to Grandmaster Vishwanathan Anand

Since its launch, the torch has travelled to iconic locations including Red Fort in Delhi, Dharamshala in Himachal Pradesh, the Attari Border in Amritsar, the Taj Mahal in Agra and the Vidhan Sabha in Lucknow and Dandi in Gujarat among others.

Hosts India is fielding 20 players at the Olympiad being held at Mahabalipuram, near Chennai. With 188 countries registered for the Olympiad, India is set to witness a huge congregation of nations for a sporting event for the first time on Indian soil.

Chess, as we know it today, traces its origin to the Indian game of Chaturanga, dating back to the 6th century CE. The game spread throughout Asia and Europe over the coming centuries, and eventually evolved into what we know as chess around the 16th century. (ANI)

This report is auto-generated from ANI news service. ThePrint holds no responsibility for its content.

See the original post:
The first-ever Chess Olympiad Torch Relay travels through prominent locations of Nagpur, Pune - ThePrint

Tall poppy cut short: Nigel Short and the politics of chess – TheArticle

Has there been a plot to sabotage Nigel Short s prospects of becoming President ofFID,the governing body of world chess? Already Vice-President, England s greatest ever chess player and chess politician since the days of Howard Staunton would, as I hoped, take the logical next step, identify a Ukrainian running mate, and stand for election to the supreme post in the elections due later this month, to coincide with the Olympiad in Chennai. With the incumbent President Arkady Dvorkovich a Russian, hardly conceivable in the current climate after Putins violation of Ukraine , I believed that Nigel would be a shoo-in for the top job.

Instead, Short has become enmeshed in a scandal that has resulted in his being censured and suspended by the FID Ethics Commission. Coincidence or a blatant and politically motivated example of that pithy Antipodean formulation, the Tall Poppy Syndrome?

This syndromeis a cultural phenomenon in which detractorscriticise or sabotage those who have achieved notable success in one or more aspects of life, particularly in intellectual or cultural arenas; cutting down the tall poppy describes a push towards mediocrity and conformity.It will be recalled that when Nigel Short (pictured above, in 1976) first stood for high office in FID, four years ago, that the English Chess Federation pulled out all the stops to frustrate his ambitions and in fact made it pellucidly clear that they would cast their vote for the Greek rival candidate, Makropoulos, rather than support their compatriot Nigel.

Instead of fighting his corner, Nigel has instead, and to my dismay, now resigned. I had hoped that he might soldier on, but I also fully respect, understand and sympathise with his presumed sentiment : If they don t want me, after all I have done for them in promoting chess globally,then I want nothing to do with them!

Dvorkovich himself has not stepped down, thus leaving FID as the only international body of anyprominence still led by a Russian. Indeed, Dvorkovich will stand again and probably win, due to the master stroke of recruiting Viswanathan Anand, the Indian former World Champion as his running mate, for an election to be held in India.

Dvorkovich s tears at Shorts resignation struck me as singularly crocodilian. This is his statement:

I learned with deep regret about Mr Short s decision to resign from the position of Vice President today. I would like to note that all these years, Nigel has worked tirelessly to promote chess on all continents. Thanks to his efforts, the FID family has been expanded by several new federations.

Often the fruits of his dedicated work were to be appreciated only years later. As an example thanks to his efforts, the long-standing conflict in the Pakistani Chess Federation began to be resolved, ending with legitimate elections in June 2022.

I am sincerely glad that in 2018 Nigel agreed to accept my nomination as the Vice President of FID. Several more candidates from his 2018 ticket currently work in the FID Council and make a significant contribution to our common duties.

I would like to highlight Nigel s organisational and leadership abilities, as well as to reiterate that his intentions have always been consistent with the mission of FIDE.

Nigel s decision is open and sincere, perhaps even a little emotional and related to the decision of EDC, but I believe that Nigel will continue his mission and agree with my proposal to find the right format for our joint work for the benefit of chess.

Arkady Dvorkovich,FID President

If the Presidents conscience remains clear, I would like to take this opportunity to draw his attention to the words of that great Roman historian Tacitus, which seem astonishingly relevant to the war in Ukraine.

Tacitus Agricola (c. 98 AD)recounts the life of Gnaeus Julius Agricola, an eminent Roman general and Tacituss father-in-law. It also covers, briefly, the geography and ethnography of ancient Britain. Tacitus favourably contrasts the liberty of the native Britons with the tyranny and corruption of the continental Empire. The book contains eloquent polemics against the greed of Rome, one of which(thatTacitus claims is from a speech bythe native chieftain, Calgacus, at the Battle of Mons Graupius in Caledonia) ends with the celebrated assertion: Auferre trucidare rapere falsis nominibus imperium, atque ubi solitudinem faciunt, pacem appellant. To ravage, to slaughter, to usurp under false titles, this they call empire; and wherever they make a desert, they call it peace.

Nigel Shorts resignation as FID Vice President appears to have been the result of losing a FID Ethics Commission case, involving his trip to a Caribbean island where theMerovingianly fain ant official federation had provoked the formation of a rival organisation, now claiming to be legitimate.In that context pleasesee this link to the bloviatingly self-important concoction of typographically challenged diatribes from fides quasi judicial kangaroo court.

Were FID insuch a hurry to get the censureout thatthey forgot to proof read it? This shambles involved a cornucopia ofrickety legal arguments, through whichany competent BritishQCcoulddrive through not one, but several coaches and horses, had Nigel felt motivated to go down that route.

Thus,in a British civil contract case (Peabody Trust Governors vs.Reeve [2008]), The Court decided that the clauses didn t make sense, rather they contradicted one another. On that basis, the Court was obligedto interpret the agreement in the[respondent s] favour.

This invalidity of a self-contradictory clauseis certainly evident in the case ofArticle 4.10 of the FID Charterwhich ostensibly proposes to bestrictlynon-judgemental whilesimultaneouslyinthe definitive process ofexercising a judgement. It is thus invalid and should be struck out.

Everybodys playing the game But nobodys rules are the same Nobodys on nobodys side Better learn to go it alone Recognize youre out on your own Nobodys on nobodys side.

Tim Rice/ ABBA(malehalf) Chess the Musical.

Let us close the curtain with a potpourri of games across a decade, from the tall white poppy of modern British chess, up against a rather good former Russian world champion.

Short vs. Karpov (SWIFT Blitz, 1987) Short vs. Karpov (Linares, 1989) Short vs. Karpov ( 1992 Candidates semi-final , Caro-Kann) Short vs. Karpov ( 1992 Candidates semi-final , Sicilian, Richter-Rauzer Attack) Short vs. Karpov ( 1992 Candidates semi-final ,Ruy Lopez, Worrall Attack 1) Short vs. Karpov ( 1992 Candidates semi-final ,Ruy Lopez, Worrall Attack 2) Short vs. Karpov (Dortmund, 1997)

As Nigel withdraws from chess politics, he has staged a resurgence as a player in the winning England squad which late last month triumphed in the World Senior Team Championship held in Italy. Remaining members of the victorious World Over 50 team were Micky Adams, John Emms, Keith Arkell and Mark Hebden.England also won the Womens Over 50 and the Mens Over 65 titles a triple gold medal triumph.

Raymond Keene s latest book Fifty Shades of Ray: Chess in the year of the Coronavirus, containing some of his best pieces from TheArticle, is now available from Blackwell s .

We are the only publication thats committed to covering every angle. We have an important contribution to make, one thats needed now more than ever, and we need your help to continue publishing throughout the pandemic. So please, make a donation.

Original post:
Tall poppy cut short: Nigel Short and the politics of chess - TheArticle