When Bill Bishop, who edits the popular China-focused    newsletter Sinocism, attempted to link to its July 9 edition on    LinkedIn (LNKD), the Mountain View, California, company    censored out a link to a Washington Post    article about the 1989 Tiananmen Square massacre. Bishop    received the    following explanation:  
    We recognized when we launched a localized version of LinkedIn    in China, we would need to adhere to the requirements of the    Chinese government in order to operate in China. We also aim to    be transparent about our actions and their impact on our    members, hence the prior notification of your content being    blocked, LinkedIn said.  
    The content that Bishop posted falls within LinkedINs    adherence to Chinas censorship laws. But there was just one    problem. Bishop posted the link from a U.S. IP address, as he    was traveling in Maryland at the time.  
    LinkedIns censorship policy in China, a market that the career    networking website sees as integral to its global growth    strategy, has attracted significant controversy since the    company launched a Chinese-language version of its site this    February. Unlike fellow social networks like Facebook (FB) and    Twitter (TWTR), which are firewalled in China because they    refuse to comply with Chinese censorship demands, LinkedIn    eliminates sensitive articles from its website in order to    remain accessible in the country. Under the current    regulations, LinkedIn users anywhere in the world -- not just    in China -- cannot view stories that violate that countrys    censorship laws.  
    It is this stipulation that has drawn so much criticism -- and    has led LinkedIn to publicly consider a reversal. But if    Bishops experience is any indication, the companys policies    appear to be even more restrictive than advertised: LinkedIn    censored an article written by a US citizen from an American IP    address to users around the world. In the explanation for why    it blocked Bishops July 9 newsletter: However, we only block    content globally if it is posted from China IP addresses. We    have decided to do so in this situation to protect the safety    of our members in China.  
    When reached about Bishops case, Hani Durzy, LinkedIns    director of communication, confirmed that the company has    occasionally blocked Sinocism within China, but did not explain    why Bishops link to the Washington Post story triggered the    global blockage.  
    What accounts for this discrepancy? Bishop isnt certain. In a    series    of follow-up    Tweets,    he speculated that LinkedIN hasnt perfected its censorship    practices.  
    From the beginning of its relationship with China, where the    company boasts a user base of five million, LinkedIn has    defended its cooperation with the Communist Party. In a post to    announce the creation of the Chinese-language site in February,    CEO Jeff Weiner wrote:  
    We believe that individuals in the United States, China, and    beyond will benefit substantially from Chinese professionals    connecting with each other and LinkedIn members in other parts    of the world.  
Read this article:
LinkedIn Abides By Chinese Censorship Laws -- But Is It Consistent?