Archive for the ‘Censorship’ Category

Pro-Palestinian Students Charge Universities With Censorship

BOSTON Free, free Palestine! protesters shouted, carrying a 30-foot-long Palestinian flag through the streets.

At first glance, the 150 people gathered just outside Northeastern University on March 18 seemed to be staging a typical rally criticizing Israeli policiesan increasingly common sight on left-leaning American campuses. But upon closer inspection, the mix of NEU students and local Boston activists were calling for another thing to be freed: their speech.

Eleven days before the protest, the NEU chapter of Students for Justice in Palestine had been suspended, meaning they could no longer meet as a group on NEU property or receive university funds. The administration cited several violations of campus policies and procedures, most recently when SJP failed to get university approval to distribute 600 fliers on February 23.

The fliers were designed as mock eviction notices to symbolize the Palestinian experience in occupied territory, where homes have been razed for Israeli settlements. It warned the reader that their dorm was scheduled for demolition in three days, followed by statistics on displaced Palestinian families. The flier was punctuated by a disclaimer at the bottom: This is not a real eviction notice. #BostonMockEviction.

The requirement to obtain pre-approval before distributing fliers is in the student resource handbook at Northeastern. But according to SJP members, the university doesnt consistently enforce the policy.

There are hundreds of fliers in different places around campus, and almost none of them have the universitys stamp of approval, said Max Geller, an SJP spokesman.

Charles Flewelling, a third-year law student who's part of several Northeastern student groups, including the National Lawyers Guild and Queers United in Radical Rethinking, agreed with that assessment. "It is common practice for student groups to put up fliers around school," he said. "None of [our] fliers had university approval," but neither he nor any of his group members "have received any form of discipline or warning."

Tori Porell, the president of SJP, said this double standard is part of a concerted effort to censor the pro-Palestinian group. The result, she said, is that our free speech is suppressed.

Renata Nyul, director of communications at Northeastern, said SJP was "sanctioned based on a series of violations of university policy. Every student organization is viewed the same way. [SJP] is not being singled out." Northeastern also wrote in an earlier statement that the issue at hand is not one of free speech."

Still, the campus has become the latest battleground for pro-Palestinian student activists who claim they have been marginalized or unfairly punished by university higher-ups. Earlier this month, a banner reading Stand for Justice, Stand for Palestine was taken down at Barnard College following complaints by pro-Israel student groups. Last year, five Florida Atlantic University students were put on indefinite probation and ordered to take a civility training course after briefly protesting and walking out of a talk by a member of the Israel Defense Forces. The Center for Constitutional Rights, which has been tracking this issue, has documented more than 80 complaints of campus intimidation against advocates for Palestinian human rights.

Originally posted here:
Pro-Palestinian Students Charge Universities With Censorship

Fond du Lac High School censorship rule under fire

A new policy at Fond du Lac High School that allows administrators to oversee student publications is drawing criticism and sparking a free speech debate - and several English teachers are asking the school district to rethink the rules.

Journalism students at "Cardinal Columns," a student magazine, were told this month that the district was implementing a policy that would allow the principal to oversee all student publications and refuse to publish certain items.

The move came after the student magazine published a story in February called "The Rape Joke," according to the Fond du Lac Reporter Media. The story, by senior Tanvi Kumar, investigated the prevalence of rape jokes and rape culture at the school and included anonymous stories from victims.

School Superintendent James Sebert and high school Principal Jon Wiltzius raised concerns about the content, including the possibility that the subject matter might be inappropriate for immature audiences and that the photos might be too suggestive or edgy.

Sixteen members of the English Department have signed and presented a 22-page statement supporting the students. It reads: "Such guidelines are not only a clear path toward censorship of student expression but also drastically alter the relationship between school publications and the administration and break sharply with roughly 100 years of district precedent regarding such publication."

The teachers urge the superintendent and school board to either abandon the guidelines or put them on hold "until new guidelines or a new policy may be drafted in collaboration with the students, community and experts in the field."

The statement also says the story "stands as an exemplar of high-quality, responsible journalism that has helped countless readers feel supported, speak up, seek help and come together in a way that has undoubtedly resulted in a more positive environment in our school."

See the article here:
Fond du Lac High School censorship rule under fire

Google Nazi Censorship – Damn YOU Plus! + – Video


Google Nazi Censorship - Damn YOU Plus! +
Google Nazi Censorship.

By: Daniel Vincent Kelley

View original post here:
Google Nazi Censorship - Damn YOU Plus! + - Video

RightsCon 2014: Privatised Enforcement and Corporate Censorship: The Future of Freedom of Expression – Video


RightsCon 2014: Privatised Enforcement and Corporate Censorship: The Future of Freedom of Expression
Moderator: Lucy Purdon, Programme Support Manager, IHRB Participants: Joe McNamee, Executive Director, EDRi Gabrielle Guillemin, Legal Officer Article 19 Ani...

By: Institute for Human Rights and Business

Read this article:
RightsCon 2014: Privatised Enforcement and Corporate Censorship: The Future of Freedom of Expression - Video

Censorship and Banning in Gaming [Adventure/Interactive Fiction] – Video


Censorship and Banning in Gaming [Adventure/Interactive Fiction]
Let #39;s talk about some awesome games that were either banned or censored for what seems like incredibly dumb reasons.

By: PushingUpRoses

More here:
Censorship and Banning in Gaming [Adventure/Interactive Fiction] - Video