Archive for the ‘Censorship’ Category

Censorship, plainly – Arkansas Online

The most galling part of the letter outlining the decision to remove from view a student painting at the center of a congressional controversy is not the claim by the architect of the Capitol to have undertaken a dispassionate review. It's not even when he says the artwork doesn't comply with House rules. It's when he says he looks forward to working with all participating members of Congress for the next, upcoming 2017 Congressional Art Competition.

Really? Why bother?

It is pretty clear that the student-artist's work was sacrificed to political pressure and vigilante censorship--in the U.S. Capitol of all places. That should alarm anyone who thinks the First Amendment, unlike art, is not a matter of personal taste and choice.

At issue is "Untitled #1,"a painting by Missouri student David Pulphus that depicts racial confrontation with police. It won unanimous approval in the Congressional Art Competition in Missouri's 1st Congressional District last May and, like the more than 400 other entries accepted and approved, was displayed in the U.S. Capitol. For more than six months, the painting hung in the underground tunnel between the Capitol and the Cannon House Office Building and was viewed by thousands of visitors without incident.

That changed when an alt-right blog and other conservative commentators started a campaign against it.

The painting was returned to Rep. William Clay, who said he will display it in his office. Young Pulphus, for his part, has acted with restraint and dignity. His only comment: "The art speaks for itself." So does the unseemly stampede in Paul Ryan's House.

Editorial on 01/20/2017

Print Headline: Censorship, plainly

See original here:
Censorship, plainly - Arkansas Online

Facebook dismissive of censorship, abuse concerns, rights groups allege – Reuters

By Dustin Volz | WASHINGTON

WASHINGTON Nearly 80 rights groups on Wednesday accused Facebook (FB.O) of "racially biased censorship" and failing to be more transparent about its removal policies and cooperation with law enforcement, adding to criticism the company has faced in recent months over its management of content on its network of 1.8 billion users.

The sharp rebuke, sent in response to a December letter from Senior Vice President Joel Kaplan, reflected increasing impatience among advocacy groups that say Facebook has inadequately addressed their concerns despite repeated promises of action from senior executives.

Instead, the groups wrote, Kaplan's response "merely explains current, publicly available Facebook policies and fails to address the modest solutions to racially biased censorship we presented in earlier letters and meetings." SumOfUs, Center for Media Justice and the American Civil Liberties Union were among the signatories.

In his letter, Kaplan acknowledged Facebook's community operations team "sometimes get things wrong" but said the company was committed to correcting mistakes and working with outside partners.

Facebook has been persistently criticized in the past year over how it polices everything from harassment and extremist propaganda to gun sales and news hoaxes on its enormous platform, a multifaceted challenge the company has often responded to with tweaks of its existing terms of service and community standards. More recently, the company has faced controversy regarding displays of violence broadcast in live video.

Last week the company announced a new "Journalism Project" intended to improve and deepen its relationship with news organizations, one of a series of moves taken in response to a storm of opprobrium that it did not do enough to tackle the problem of fake news stories during the U.S. presidential campaign.

In their letter, the rights groups said their organizations had experienced an "uneven application" of Facebook's community standards and drawbacks that come with relying on users to report abusive content. Racial justice activists routinely have content that discusses racism or protests removed, they said, while harassment and threats targeting users on the basis of race, religion and sexual orientation are "thriving" on Facebook.

"This pattern of censorship represents a double standard, one that seems to be addressed only through direct activist intervention or significant media attention," the groups wrote.

Facebook employs a multilayered system to handle more than a million content complaints a day. Most complaints are flagged by users and reviewed by low-level staffers and contractors who consult a thick rule book to interpret and apply its comparatively spare community standards that users are asked to follow.

The rights groups made several recommendations to Facebook in its letter, including allowing users to appeal removals not just for profiles or pages but individual posts.

They also recommended giving users a written justification when a post is removed, producing a public report that would include figures on content removals and the number of takedown requests submitted by law enforcement, and additional training on racial discrimination for content reviewers.

The coalition requested a meeting by early February at Facebook's Menlo Park headquarters to discuss its concerns and recommendations.

(Reporting by Dustin Volz)

WASHINGTON Outgoing U.S. Federal Communications Commission Chairman Tom Wheeler warned Republicans against dismantling the Obama administration's landmark "net neutrality" protections that bar internet service providers from slowing consumer access to web content.

DAVOS, Switzerland Open markets and global trade have been blamed for job losses over the last decade, but global CEOs say the real culprits are increasingly machines.

SAN FRANCISCO Ride-hailing company Uber Technologies Inc. has hired the man behind Google search to work closely with Chief Executive Travis Kalanick and help grow the company's self-driving car program.

Here is the original post:
Facebook dismissive of censorship, abuse concerns, rights groups allege - Reuters

Facebook Should Do More To Address Censorship And Harassment Issues, Rights Groups Say – Forbes


Forbes
Facebook Should Do More To Address Censorship And Harassment Issues, Rights Groups Say
Forbes
The group asks Facebook to provide a simple and accessible appeals process, increase transparency around content removal and carry out an external audit to review the human rights outcomes of its censorship, stating that the company's current audits ...
Facebook dismissive of censorship, abuse concerns, rights groups allegeReuters
Facebook Slammed For 'Racially Biased Censorship'Vocativ
Facebook slammed by rights groups for 'racially biased censorship' in hate speech takedownsInternational Business Times UK
Telegraph.co.uk -PCMag India -CNET
all 8 news articles »

Excerpt from:
Facebook Should Do More To Address Censorship And Harassment Issues, Rights Groups Say - Forbes

Clearing Out the App Stores: Government Censorship Made Easier – New York Times


New York Times
Clearing Out the App Stores: Government Censorship Made Easier
New York Times
There's a new form of digital censorship sweeping the globe, and it could be the start of something devastating. In the last few weeks, the Chinese government compelled Apple to remove New York Times apps from the Chinese version of the App Store.
Apple increases App Store prices by 25% following Brexit voteThe Guardian
Apple App Store prices rise in UK, India and TurkeyBBC News

all 88 news articles »

See the article here:
Clearing Out the App Stores: Government Censorship Made Easier - New York Times

Daily Report: A New Form of Censorship in App Stores – New York Times

Daily Report: A New Form of Censorship in App Stores
New York Times
Different governments have different ways of controlling what information their citizens do or do not see. In recent years, technology used to do things like blocking websites or choking off social media feeds has become crucial to those ...

See more here:
Daily Report: A New Form of Censorship in App Stores - New York Times