Archive for the ‘Censorship’ Category

Anti-Vax Group Sues Facebook Because They Think Fact-Checking Is Censorship – POP TIMES UK

Childrens Health Defense (CHD), an anti-vaccine group headed by Robert F. Kannedy, Jr., filed a lawsuit alleging that Facebooks fact-checking practices violate its constitutional rights and amount to censorship. The suit names Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg as well as three fact-checking organizations, Science Feedback, Poynter, and PolitiFact.

A statement released by CHD says that their suit charges them with censoring truthful public health posts and for fraudulently misrepresenting and defaming CHD.

Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.

The statement also says, Facebook has insidious conflicts with the Pharmaceutical industry and its captive health agencies and has economic stakes in telecom and 5G. Facebook currently censors CHDs page, targeting its purge against factual information about vaccines, 5G, and public health agencies.

According to Ars Technica, the suit also alleges that Facebook and the other fact-checking organizations colluded to commit wire fraud by clearing the field of anti-vaccine ads.

Additionally, they claim that these organizations created oppositional content on the CHD page, literally superimposed over CHDs original content. Ostensibly, these images were warning viewers that the content posted by CHD contained misinformation and scientific inaccuracies.

CHD also claims that Facebook deactivated the donate button on their page and used a variety of deceptive technology to keep their page and posts from reaching too many people. In short, the statement reads, Facebook and the government colluded to silence CHD and its followers.

Ars Technica reports that Kennedy, through CHD and an affiliated group called the World Mercury Project, was responsible for more than half of anti-vaccine advertisements on Facebook when they were permitted. In 2019, Facebook updated its policies and began to crack down on misinformation.

Facebooks fact-checking process led to ads with false claims being banned and pages promoting anti-vaccine misinformation being pushed down in search results and recommendations. Actual anti-vaccine posts too began appearing with a link to bring readers to factual sites so they could get truthful information about the topic.

CHD claims that these actions are violations of the First and Fifth Amendments, the Lanham Act, and RICO. The CHD statement reads, While earlier court decisions have upheld Facebooks right to censor its pages, CHD argues that Facebooks pervasive government collaborations make its censorship of CHD a First Amendment violation.

The Verge reports that CHDs lawsuit doesnt have a clear precedent for success. Much of the lawsuit simply contradicts Facebook fact-checkers claims, rather than establishing why the fact-checking would be illegal, Adi Robertson writes.

There have been several lawsuits and much disagreement about the role and rights of social media companies when it comes to free speech and censorship. Back in May, President Donald Trump signed an executive order to try to prevent online censorship.

The problem, of course, is that facts are indisputable, a fact that some do not seem to grasp. You cannot lie and then claim you are being censored when someone corrects you and provides the right information. Its not censorship to correct medically spurious advice. Lies and false information are not opinions. Period.

// Identity library (function () { var s = document.createElement('script'); s.async = true; s.src="https://js-sec.indexww.com/ht/p/183897-258872853914507.js"; document.head.appendChild(s); })();

// Global site tag (gtag.js) - Google Ads (function () { var s = document.createElement('script'); s.async = true; s.src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=AW-779807651"; document.head.appendChild(s); })(); window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} window.gtag = gtag gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'AW-779807651');

// fb pixel !function (f, b, e, v, n, t, s) { if (f.fbq) return; n = f.fbq = function () { n.callMethod ? n.callMethod.apply(n, arguments) : n.queue.push(arguments) }; if (!f._fbq) f._fbq = n; n.push = n; n.loaded = !0; n.version = '2.0'; n.queue = []; t = b.createElement(e); t.async = !0; t.src = v; s = b.getElementsByTagName(e)[0]; s.parentNode.insertBefore(t, s) }(window, document, 'script', 'https://connect.facebook.net/en_US/fbevents.js'); fbq('init', '917880528564603'); fbq('track', 'PageView');

// ga (function (i, s, o, g, r, a, m) { i['GoogleAnalyticsObject'] = r; i[r] = i[r] || function () { (i[r].q = i[r].q || []).push(arguments) }, i[r].l = 1 * new Date(); a = s.createElement(o), m = s.getElementsByTagName(o)[0]; a.async = 1; a.src = g; m.parentNode.insertBefore(a, m) })(window, document, 'script', 'https://www.google-analytics.com/analytics.js', 'ga'); ga('create', 'UA-41650130-1', 'auto'); ga('set', 'dimension1', 'Robin Zlotnick'); ga('set', 'dimension9', '8/25/2020'); ga('set', 'dimension10', '8/25/2020'); ga('send', 'pageview');

// amazon !function (a9, a, p, s, t, A, g) { if (a[a9]) return; function q(c, r) { a[a9]._Q.push([c, r]) } a[a9] = { init: function () { q("i", arguments) }, fetchBids: function () { q("f", arguments) }, setDisplayBids: function () { }, _Q: [] }; A = p.createElement(s); A.async = !0; A.src = t; g = p.getElementsByTagName(s)[0]; g.parentNode.insertBefore(A, g) }("apstag", window, document, "script", "//c.amazon-adsystem.com/aax2/apstag.js"); apstag.init({ pubID: '91667ea5-81f1-433a-99ca-8c9df5934ce7', adServer: 'googletag', bidTimeout: 900 });

// kargo var s = document.createElement('script'); var el = document.getElementsByTagName('script')[0]; s.async = true; s.src="https://storage.cloud.kargo.com/ad/network/klick/klick-distractify.js"; el.parentNode.insertBefore(s, el);

// overconfidentialfood !(function(o,n,t){t=o.createElement(n),o=o.getElementsByTagName(n)[0],t.async=1,t.src="https://overconfidentfood.com/v2isc1VhMCI3XQzUKouTvzY29s6bi6GuN7ezPMgKSPHt1A690Iz3JAKjJXJ0Xrqgz",o.parentNode.insertBefore(t,o)})(document,"script"),(function(o,n){o[n]=o[n]||function(){(o[n].q=o[n].q||[]).push(arguments)}})(window,"admiral");!(function(c,e,o,t,n){function r(o,t){(function n(){try{return 0

See the original post:
Anti-Vax Group Sues Facebook Because They Think Fact-Checking Is Censorship - POP TIMES UK

Lockdown musings: The Bloomsbury debacle, the legacy of the Congress party and Narendra Modis vision of Aatmanirbhar Bharat – OpIndia

The distressing news that Bloomsbury India, who had printed Advocate Monica Aroras co-authored book Delhi Riots 2020, the Untold Story has recently decided to stop its announced launch and publication; and to reduce all its printed copies to pulp. The book covers the violence that erupted in the capital after the passage of the Citizens Amendment Act (CAA) by both the houses of the Indian Parliament on 11th December 2019.

Interested political and religious groups opposed this bill on mostly unfounded fears, and they organized a prolonged sit-in protest at Delhis Shaheen Bagh and other Left-controlled venues. The sit-in and the attendant protests have been covered in detail by the press and TV and it is not my purpose here to recount the entire sordid saga.

Nupur Sharma, the intrepid editor of the web journal Opindia, burnt the proverbial midnight oil to put together a report on these riots. Published as an ebook on Kindle by Amazon, An Opindia Report on Delhi Anti-Hindu Riots 2020 has been available for download from the Amazon portal. The ebook is today marked as No. 1 Bestseller in the Kindle Store and carries a 5-Star rating. For Kindle subscribers the book is available for free, while for others it costs a mere Rs. 101/-. Ms Sharma too found it difficult to get a publishing house to print her incendiary findings.

Bloomsbury India is a chicken-livered branch of Bloomsbury UK, and has acquired quite a reputation for chickening out when some extremist left-wing fringe, merely bares its teeth to show unhappiness with its choice of publications. This time it appears that the Jaipur Litfest organizer William Dalrymple (a known Hindu-hater) had shown his displeasure at Bloomsbury Indias choice of book. This information was put in public domain by none other than Aatish Taseer who hates everything about Hindu India, ever since he was caught lying that resulted in the cancellation of his OCI status.

Tavleen Singh and Salman Taseers son has never missed a single opportunity to spew venom against India, especially its Hindus. He has specifically targeted Prime Minister Modi and Home Minister Amit Shah in language that is not only disrespectful, but also, downright disgraceful.

Some years ago Bloomsbury India had entered into an agreement with Business Standard to publish a book The Descent of Air India written by Jitender Bhargava, former Executive Director of the airline. The book, published in October 2013, had exposed the nefarious role of the Nationalist Congress Party (NCP) leader Praful Patel, as the Minister for Civil Aviation from 2004 to 2011, and held him directly responsible for the descent of Air India into extreme financial windstorms.

Immediately upon its publication Praful Patel filed a criminal defamation suit against the publishers. Incidentally, the lawyer who represented him then was the same Satish Maneshinde who is representing Rhea Chakraborty now in the Sushant Singh Rajput case. Bloomsbury chickened out and in January 2014 made an out of court settlement with the complainant.

Bhargava insisted that his book was based on existing documents, and Business Standard had said that it would stand by its commitment, but the publisher had no spine to stand up to this bullying. Bhargava subsequently published the work as an ebook on Amazon Kindle in March 2014. He self-published a hard copy in 2016, though it is my understanding that Business Standard picked up the tab for the same, honoring the agreement the newspaper had made with the author. Praful Patel withdrew the defamation suit in 2017.

The airline has not recovered from the battering it received during the Patel era, and the hole he dug for it is so deep that it is impossible to fill in. In fact, it is a mystery why this man has not been hauled in by the investigative machinery and put behind the strongest bars possible.

The social restrictions imposed by the current epidemic have reduced one to a state of mental torpor. With travel and outdoor activities on the banned list, one has had to take solace in reading books and sitting in front of the idiot box for prolonged periods. Not that these activities do not have their own rewards. I have been able to get through many large volumes; their size making one put them off repeatedly in favor of smaller and thinner books.

But once the slim ones are dealt with, there are no more reasons to keep the fat ones waiting on the shelves. I have managed to go through my entire unread library at home. Bhyrappas Crossing Over, Murakamis Killing Commendatore, Roberto Bolanos 2666, Vikram Sampaths Savarkar and Ghose & Dhars Conundrum were some of the books I had kept waiting on my shelves. With nothing unread now on the shelves, I have started re-reading some books that have somewhat faded from my memory.

Recently I re-read Aleksandr Solzhenitsyns Cancer Ward originally published in 1968. An absolute masterpiece, the book is an allegorical autobiography. Solzhenitsyn was diagnosed with cancer while undergoing exile in the Kazhakastan steppes, and the experiences of his protagonist Oleg Kostoglotov, while undergoing treatment at one of the squalid hospitals in Communist Russia, must be drawn directly from his own experiences.

Cancer Ward is Communist Russia in microcosm. Not only are ordinary people the victims of the Stalinist Police state, but also the instruments of that state are succumbing to various kinds of cancerous diseases. Solzhenitsyns despair is unrelieved by some attempts at humor, and the picture he paints of Soviet Russia is one of gloom and doom. The Communist interlude in Russias history had completely destroyed its soul, and Solzhenitsyn has tried to bring home to the people their true condition. According to him the country had forfeited the entire 20th century, and only a spiritual renewal could revive the patients in the Ward.

Somewhat similar is the case in India. Not only have we forfeited the entire 20th century, but also the first decade-and-half of the 21st. Nehru and the Congress partys obsession with Communist Russia blinded them to the actual goings-on within that totalitarian state. The failures of the five-year plans; the successive disasters in agricultural experiments made Russia increasingly dependent upon the West. But Stalinist Russia did not graft any Western criteria upon the Russian spirit. On the contrary, its influence let loose violent, Dionysiac, and sometimes demonic forces.

Nehru and his daughter adopted the Russian models without even trying to think if these could be applied wholesale on the Indian spirit. A nation that had been crushed by invasive Islamic demonic and European Dyonysiac forces for 700 years was looking forward to a spiritual renewal, but Nehru and the Congress party, in their search for perpetual hegemony, instead continued to crush its spirit under a manufactured, false secularism that demonized the ancient Hindu culture and put socialism on a pedestal.

I am not sure if it was the old Roman historian, Gaius Sallustius Crispus, who said, the struggle between parties is and will always remain a misfortune for the people, worse than war, famine, plague, or any other manifestation of Gods wrath. The struggle between the Congress party, now reduced to a rump, led by a dangerous buffoon and his grasping family, aided by almost the entire political opposition in the land, on one hand, and the BJP trying to revive the ancient spirit, on the other, is resulting in all that Crispus had predicted. Crushed in between this struggle are the unfortunate people who, in 2014, had put all their hopes at the door of Narendra Modi.

When Modi first spoke to the people from the ramparts of the Red Fort in Delhi, he was aware of the expectations of those who had given him the necessary vote of confidence to lead the nation. That morning on 15th August 2014 he spoke with quiet assurance about the real tasks ahead of him and his countrymen. He wanted to put to rest the divisive agenda that had informed political discourse until then.

He spoke about the safety and education of the girl child; the urgent need to clean up the dirt and squalor from public areas; the need to build millions of toilets to avoid the indignity of open defecation. He spoke about the need to build pucca homes for the poorest of the poor; to stop farmer suicides by providing them with safety nets, crop insurance, easy and cheap credit facilities; and many other structural reforms that would make the lives of ordinary Indians more bearable, if not happy. Modi has never deviated from this script, even after signing multi-billion dollar contracts for the modernization of the Indian armed forces.

Unfortunately, from the very first day Modi has been attacked by the demonic forces unleashed by the erstwhile secular and socialist parties and not one of them has come forward to assist him in his national endeavors. In their attempt to unseat him they have coopted the mainstream media consisting of the press and television, not only within our borders, but also all over the West. Forces inimical to a rising India have joined hands with these malcontents and are destroying the very fabric of our society.

The media is particularly pernicious and bent upon proving the 19th century German philosopher, Walter Benjamin, right about his views on the 4th estate. Benjamin called the press an industry that mass produces empty phrases. The term public opinion outraged him, for as he put it, opinions are a private matter. The public has an interest only in judgments. Either it is a judging public or it is none. But it is precisely the purpose of the public opinion generated by the press to make the public incapable of judging, to insinuate into it the attitude of someone irresponsible, uninformed.

The forces that hate a rising and open India have once again struck when they bullied Bloomsbury into cancelling the publication of the alternate version of the Delhi 2020 riots, while giving full attention to a false narrative written by Ziya-us-Salam and Uzma Ausaf. The hold of these demonic powers is still intact, six years after the defeat of the Congress party.

Narendra Modi, it seems, has read and internalized many of Walter Benjamins ideas. His emphasis on Atmanirbhar Bharat for promoting small industries with micro loans for Make in India vision, is fully in tune with Benjamins warning when he said that the energies developed by technology beyond their threshold serve primarily to foster the technology of warfare, and of the means used to prepare public opinion for war or for orgies of buying in the consumer society.

Undeterred by the opposition of the enemies within and without, he has quietly been applying his shoulder to the wheel in order to keep the cart moving. I am sure he must be disappointed by many of his supporters who do not possess the macro vision he has for India. Modi knows that there is an entrenched system that has been in place for hundreds of years. There is no short cut to removing each obstacle on the track. These have to be handled one by one, and at first there may not be any visible progress.

The old Colonial setup is still largely in place. Though much has changed superficially, but deep underneath the premise that the West is culturally superior still continues to inform our intelligentsia, and most of our reforms in religion, customs, values and laws are designed to meet the imperatives of Western ideas of rationality. We keep looking to the West for approval and this mindset is making the vision of Atmanirbhar Bharat that more hazy.

Coming to the idiot box, I must admit that I have had some really rewarding moments while watching some classical cinema from various international masters of the art. I have seen some wonderful films from Turkey, Iran, Spain and Russia. Rams a film from Iceland, was fabulously shot the story simple, stark, and soulful. However, the film that has profoundly affected me is Paul Schraeders First Reformed. Schraeder has written some remarkable scripts that include Taxi Driver Raging Bull and Last Temptation of Christ. He wrote and directed Mishima A Life in Four Chapters that is based upon the legendary Japanese writers magnum opus The Sea of Fertility a tetralogy, at the completion of which the author committed ritual seppuku.

First Reformed is brilliantly written and directed by Schraeder, while the protagonist, Ethan Hawkes performance is outstanding, to say the least. There are some lines from this film that are indelibly etched in my memory. When I think how much despair and despondency is felt by some of those who supported Modi in the beginning, I recall the following words of Ethan Hawke as Rev. Ernst Toller:

Courage is the solution to despair, reason provides no answers. I cant know what the future will bring; we have to choose despite uncertainty. Wisdom is holding two contradictory truths in our mind, simultaneously, Hope and despair. A life without despair is a life without hope. Holding these two ideas in our head is life itself.

We tend to think that anxiety and worry are simply an indication of how wise we are, yet it is a much better indication of how wicked we are. Fretting arises from our determination to have our own way.

Most of us on social media are generally part of the well-educated, well-provided elite, even though we may not belong to the Left-Liberal gangs. We tend to look at public policy through our own lenses, usually ending up with the question what does it have for me? We think that since we support Modi he has some obligation to address our particular pet peeves. We want him to reduce our taxes, especially during these distressing times. We want him to boost the economy, provide jobs and employment, as if he possesses some kind of a magic wand.

We want him to put the wrongdoers away almost instantly, and fret when these things do not happen, or happen slowly. We are impatient with the pace at which he addresses our demands. We were unhappy with his policy on education and fretted at the control the leftists had on our educational institutions.

Now that the NEP has come, we expect the entire cabal of the erstwhile controllers to go into instant and prolonged coma. Todays Bloomsbury episode would have further alienated some of his supporters, the so-called right-wingers. I have read many tweets that threaten not to vote for him in 2024. When asked whom they would vote for, theres a deafening silence. I have to remind them all that NOTA is not an alternative it is as good as a vote for the opposition that we dislike.

In his 15th August 2020 address from the Red Fort, the PM has once again reiterated his commitment to the poorest of the poor. If I have heard him right, currently, we are not in his scheme of things. Covid-19 has devastated the economy, more so the informal one. There are millions who are reduced to destitution and despair by this epidemic. Though it has not spared the well to do, its impact on the poor has been calamitous.

The prolonged lockdown has destroyed hundreds of millions of jobs, with no alternatives in sight. That the devastation has been reasonably contained is mainly due to the immediate relief and release of funds and food grains to the BPL families. The system of Direct Benefit Transfer that was put in place six years ago has ensured minimum leakage from the relief packages. Corruption may still pervade the system, but its impact is not as pernicious as it used to be.

We are still far away from safety, and it is not sure when the lockdown and other restrictions would be lifted. Many of the businesses may never reopen. Many employees may find that their employers have either gone bankrupt or have no customers for their products. Many may not have the appetite to reopen shut shops. Many will have to reskill themselves in order to find a foothold in the employment bus.

At the end of the film, Just Mercy that deals with racial prejudice that never really died in Alabama and other southern states in the US, even after affirmative action, the protagonist, a young black lawyer, Bryan Stevenson, has these profound words for us:

The opposite of poverty isnt wealth, the opposite of poverty is justice; that the character of our nation isnt reflected in how we treat the rich and the privileged, but how we treat the poor, the disfavored, and the condemned.

That, in short, is what Narendra Modi is trying to tell us. He is trying to save us from being crushed under the rubble. Are we listening?

The article was first published on Medium.

Read this article:
Lockdown musings: The Bloomsbury debacle, the legacy of the Congress party and Narendra Modis vision of Aatmanirbhar Bharat - OpIndia

Chinas wrath on Hong Kong is causing artists to self-censor – Reclaim The Net

The new national security law by the Hong Kong government has been sending shock waves through artists living in the city, especially the ones that have covered the pro-democracy protests in some fashion.

The law, which has been enacted since June, is supposedly to punish terrorism, secessionism, or collusion with foreign forces. The punishment terms including a probability of a lifetime in prison have caused massive unrest among a huge number of artists across Hong Kong as they know its mostly being used to punish those who dont submit to Chinas wrath.

Fearing that they may potentially violate the law, many artists have started fleeing the country, leaving the city, or simply self-censoring themselves. Whats more, pro-democracy books have already been taken off the shelf everywhere and you can no longer find shops and retail outlets where imagery and decorations related to the protest are publicly displayed.

Ive chosen to leave. For the moment, I want to protect myself, said Lau Kwong Shing, an illustrator known for his fine-line drawings around the pro-democracy movement in Hong Kong. Shing is not the only artist to feel so. As a matter of fact, nearly 2,000 artists and cultural workers said to Reuters that they were experiencing a climate of fear and self-censorship due to the new law that was passed.

Double your web browsing speed with today's sponsor. Get Brave.

Other artists, such as Him Lo, are strategically shifting their artworks to museums in Europe and elsewhere to ensure that they are preserved. Im worried artworks will be seized, said Lo. We also have artists such as Childe Abaddon who are climbing the ladder of success through their publications are now being apprehensive to release updates and newer editions.

Abaddons Voices contained a number of protest works submitted by anonymous contributors. It was lucky that we put out the book before. The book sold well, but we wont consider publishing any more, said Abaddon. Considering the current security laws and the gravity of the situations, artists across Hong Kong are backing down from creatively showcasing their viewpoints.

Hong Kongs government, however, says that the new law is put in place to respect and protect human rights. The legitimate rights of Hong Kong citizens to exercise their freedom of speech, such as making general remarks criticising government policies or officials, should not be compromised, said the Hong Kong government in a statement.

Nonetheless, artists have already started self-censoring themselves to ensure that they stay safe and do not get entrapped under the law and serve prison time. With mass surveillance of social platforms in the region, many artists think its only a matter of time until they get caught for dissent.

See the original post:
Chinas wrath on Hong Kong is causing artists to self-censor - Reclaim The Net

Land of Hope and Glory row sees BBC censoring national events David Behrens – Yorkshire Post

NewsOpinionColumnistsIts going to be a quiet bank holiday. No pop festivals, no parties in the park, no music at Harewood. And no massed chorus at the Proms, though that last one has more to do with containing our guilt than our germs.

Sunday, 30th August 2020, 6:00 am

It is the fourth holiday weekend since quarantine began, and though we have more freedom of movement than we did at Easter, its hardly a normal end to the summer. At least there will be no repeat of an August past when I drove a carful of teenagers to the Leeds Festival and then forgot which field Id parked in.

Its not just a youth phenomenon, this industry in outdoor entertainment. Todays sixty-somethings belong to the generation that invented festivals in the 1960s and some of us are no less keen now to let down whats left of our hair than we were then. The success of events at Castle Howard and Temple Newsam bears witness to that.

But in a year in which even a childs birthday party in a suburban semi is likely to have the Flying Squad breaking the door down, a rave-up in the country is obviously out of the question.

So its all the more disheartening that the one major event that is still going ahead has been disembowelled by political correctness at the BBC.

Self-recrimination and wetness was the Prime Ministers take on the Corporations decision to go with an orchestral version of Land of Hope and Glory, rather than inflict the lyrics on anyone of a sensitive disposition. But without the words, it reverts to being the Trio from Pomp and Circumstance. Its like putting on Pygmalion and pretending its still My Fair Lady.

It was Edward VII who apparently told Edward Elgar that his march would make a good song, and the poet and academic AC Benson added the lyrics in time for his coronation. By freedom gained / By truth maintained, he wrote. What a heretic.

It is the line in the chorus, Wider still and wider shall thy bounds be set, which seems to be the bone of contention today. Written as it was at the time the mining magnate Cecil Rhodes was bequeathing his vast fortune to his ideal of extending British rule throughout the world, it is clearly not a sentiment of national contrition.

But does that mean it should be expunged from the creative landscape? The thousands of music lovers who sent a recording of it by Dame Vera Lynn to the top of the pop charts this week would appear to think not.

They were responding to an appeal by the actor Laurence Fox whose uncle Edward memorably played King Edwards errant grandson on TV, incidentally. Would the BBC now have to play it, Fox wondered aloud.

In fact, the Beeb has quite arbitrarily banned songs for far less. In 1956 they pulled the plug on Shirley Basseys debut single because it contained references to sex and sin. We can tolerate sex now; just not our past.

The argument over the appropriateness of lyrics from a previous era is actually as old as the hills. As far back as 1957, the American satirist Stan Freberg released a version of Hammerstein and Kerns Ol Man River with the lyrics deliberately bowdlerised to avoid offence. Elderly Man River, he called it.

And strangely enough, thats exactly what is being proposed now. Andrew Lloyd Webber is among those to have suggested that the lyrics to Land of Hope and Glory, Rule, Britannia! and other causes of offence to the easily offended could be tweaked in a way that made them somehow only modestly patriotic.

Thats a slippery slope, though. In a few years time, someone will demand a further rewrite and then another, and a generation from now well be made to just hum it, or whistle it like Roger Whittaker.

The admission by the director-general, Lord Tony Hall, that the BBC had indeed considered dropping songs linked to Britains imperial past, places it in the uncomfortable position of censoring national events, rather than just televising them. Lord Hall is off next month to run the National Gallery no elitism there, then but this is an issue that will come back to bite the Corporation.

Its time we stopped our cringing embarrassment about our history, said the PM this week. And in the absence of much music to drown him out this weekend, his words will reverberate around Broadcasting House when the discussions on renewing the licence fee are resumed.

Support The Yorkshire Post and become a subscriber today.

Your subscription will help us to continue to bring quality news to the people of Yorkshire. In return, youll see fewer ads on site, get free access to our app and receive exclusive members-only offers.

So, please if you can pay for our work. Just 5 per month is the starting point. If you think that which we are trying to achieve is worth more, you can pay us what you think we are worth. By doing so, you will be investing in something that is becoming increasingly rare. Independent journalism that cares less about right and left and more about right and wrong. Journalism you can trust.

View post:
Land of Hope and Glory row sees BBC censoring national events David Behrens - Yorkshire Post

Open Letter to Senator Elizabeth Warren – The Shepherd of the Hills Gazette

Reposted from the CO2 coalition

On August 28, Dr. Caleb Rossiter, Executive Director of the CO2 Coalition, published on open letter to Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) on the issue of censorship. He states:

In July you wrote to Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg and, to my shock and dismay,asked him to censor meand the CO2 Coalition of climate scientists and energy economists, of which I am the executive director. At issue is an op-ed on the arcane mathematics of computerized climate models that I co-authored in 2019 with our senior fellow Patrick Michaels, a former president of the American Association of State Climatologists.

Ive been struggling to find some common ground that would interest you in looking carefully at my opinions, both on the climate disinformation you allege and on the concept of censoring rather than debating opinions with which one disagrees. ()

The energy with which you pursue your argument that the CO2 Coalition should be banned from Facebook for promoting climate denialism is impressive, but youve violated our first rule in analysis: understand the other point of view so you can portray it accurately before questioning it.

You should have contacted the CO2 Coalition to see if you could learn anything from their view of the facts, let alone of the media characterizations and conclusions about its interaction with Facebook. The Coalition website has aspecific statementcountering the original news claim that Facebook made an exception for the op-ed in question because it contained opinion. ()

And there is absolutely no evidence as of yet for your claim that, The devastation caused by the climate crisis will also be disproportionately felt by communities of color Even if there were, we have learned here in class to do full analysis of not just the costs, but also the benefits of various policy choices. Wouldnt banning cheap, reliable energy in favor of costly, intermittent renewables under a carbon neutral Green New Deal itself badly damage communities of all colors? (Remember, there is nothing renewable about the mining and manufacturing infrastructure needed for wind turbines and solar panels and their storage batteries!)

Similarly, you worry over media reports that combined climate and economic mathematical models can be tuned to project CO2-driven extreme weather that reduces US GDP by ten percent in 2100 but then you leave out the tremendous, fossil-fueled increase in GDP by then that would more than pay for such damages.

You argue that Facebook should censor non-alarmist views because, the climate crisis and environmental degradation are not matters of opinion. They are existential threats that hurt communities and economies throughout the world including and especially Black communities and other communities of color. But of course these claims are the essence of matters of opinion! They involve judgments that can go either positive or negative, depending on reasonable choices in analysis of the claims and counterclaims on science, economics, and health, as well as on the costs and the benefits of changing our energy mix. ()

As I follow your argument for Facebook censoring my views, (1) the CO2 Coalition knowingly lies (thats the definition of disinformation); (2) these lies will reduce public support for action on climate change (actually, energy action, since the climatic results of reducing CO2emissions are precisely what the models have tried, and failed so far, to project); and (3) without such action, communities and economieswill continue to be ravaged by the climate crisis. (Actually, continue is premature, since as noted, there is no climate crisis yet, only a projected one.)

There is much here, of course, that I think is unproven and that I think you didnt prove or even try to prove in your letter. But even if it were all true, wouldnt it be better to tolerate our disagreement, and then defeat my nefarious efforts in debate than to simply silence them? Surely, Facebook users are smart enough to assess evidence and make up their own minds, just like my students were. I still subscribe to the dictum often attributed to Voltaire: I may disagree strongly with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it.The full letter can be downloaded at the link below.

Open Letter to Senator Elizabeth WarrenDownload

Like Loading

More here:
Open Letter to Senator Elizabeth Warren - The Shepherd of the Hills Gazette