Archive for the ‘Censorship’ Category

Artists alter, deface their own work at YBCA to protest Gaza silence and decry censorship – 48 hills – 48 Hills

'Love Letter to Gaza' action calls out institution for not speaking up and allegedly muzzling artists.

Tens of thousands of Bay Area protesters are filling the streets and blocking freeways, and social media creators are flooding feeds with poignant imagery calling attention to the destruction of Gaza and demanding a ceasefire. But most major local arts institutionssupposed bastions of free expression, provocative messages, and artistic truthhave been strangely silent. For entities that often highlight our regional history of anti-war protest and anti-imperialist resistance in high-profile shows, theres a void where a loud Ceasefire Now should be.

Artists themselves are now protesting this institutional silence. Last Thursday evening, during a public community arts event at Yerba Buena Center for the Arts called Love Letter to SoMa, a group of artists staged a protest, defacing, adorning, augmenting, or otherwise altering their own displayed work. Calling their action Love Letter to Gaza, the eight artists, including participants in the institutions centerpiece Bay Area Now 9 show, were protesting YBCAs silence on the genocide of Palestinians, and the censorship of artists by the institution.

Artists graffitied their own pieces, hung banners over their work, dropped leaflets, and otherwise redirected their art to unequivocally address their support for the people of Palestine.

This was the first major protest over Gaza in a local arts institution, after hundreds of arts workers and other protesters occupied the Museum of Modern Art in New York City. In the wake of the Love Letter to Gaza action, YBCA closed its doors for the weekend, forcing the postponement of a portion of the 15th Annual Fresh Festival, which features performances by artists from marginalized communities.

The charges of censorship apply specifically to the work of Jeffrey Cheung and Lukaza Branfman-Verissimo. According to a statement from Jewish Voice for Peace Bay Area, which organized the action with the Palestinian Feminist Collective, Bay Area Palestinian Youth Movement, US Palestinian Community Network, and the artists: YBCA censored artist Jeff Cheungfrom creating a mural in the colors of the Palestinian flag, calling it divisive. They invited artistLukaza Branfman-Verissimoto propose text for their Statement Marquee sign, which is often a centerpiece for dialogue at the museum. But the artist says: I was told that because my text included Free Palestine they could not accept it.'

(A full response from YBCA to the censorship allegations is at the end of this post.)

The artists have launched a call to action to support their protest of YBCA. More from Jewish Voice for Peace:

The artists demands include, but are not limited to, an immediate and permanent ceasefire and for the US to stop arming Israel, an end to YBCAs censorship of artists, the removal of Zionist YBCA funders and board members, and YBCAs compliance with its vision to be a space that empowers artists, inspires community and drives lasting social change.

Our attempts to use our platforms at YBCA to catalyze solidarity with the movement to liberate Palestine have been silenced and disrupted, said Paz G., a Bay Area Now 9 artist and co-organizer of Love Letter to Gaza. There is no excuse for YBCAs silence in a time when our public dollars are being channeled to support the destruction of life and communities in Gaza.

In recent years, YBCA created robust programming and community engagement in response to social justice issues ranging from Black Lives Matter to the invasion of Ukraine. Why are they silent on the genocide of Palestinians? said champoy, a Bay Area Now 9 artist and co-organizer of Love Letter to Gaza. Cultural workers and artists across the Bay are dreaming of a free Palestine. We hope that YBCA would want to be included in that vision, not working against it.

I spoke with two Love Letter to Gaza participating artists, Sholeh Asgary and Leila Weefur, about how they altered their work, and what they hoped the protest would achieve.

Sholeh Asgary is an Iranian-born multidisciplinary artist whose Shabah e Baad (Ghost Winds) is a six-channel sound installation, inspired by a traditional practice observed in smaller Iranian villages, where qanatsancient waterways predating Roman aqueducts, created by tunneling beneath a system of wellshave enabled sustenance in arid environments.

The work taps into the ghost creeks of San Francisco, the ephemeral waterways that have been buried and otherwise disappeared by settler colonialism, Asgary said. This is being echoed by the current environmental destruction of Wadi Gaza, and the Gazan waterways in general. In her work, directional speakers create zones of sound that correspond to a map of the San Francisco creeks.

With my protest collaborator Dena Al Adeeb, I created a flyer with a new site map, of the YBCA building itself, overlaid with Wadi Gaza waterways, and arrows that referred to the forced evacuation routes for Palestinians in Gaza. We took text inspired by the Palestinian Feminist Collectives ongoing Love Letters to Palestine project, and then scattered these leaflets throughout the courtyard like the thousands of displacement leaflets the IDF has dropped by drones.

I want to emphasize the decades-long labor of Palestinian and Arab folks who have laid the groundwork that makes actions such as ours visible, as well as the organizations that supported us, she adds.

For Asgary, theres a profoundly disappointing irony to YBCAs institutional silence on Gaza. YBCA has embraced these big social justice slogans like Black Lives Matter and Woman Life Freedom and says that its creating a safe environment for marginalized artists to express themselves. But when it comes to Gaza, suddenly thats not allowed. Why invite SWANA [Southwest Asian North African] artists into your show, only to demonstrate that you think of our communities safety and humanity as divisive.

Why is it this particular movement thats forbidden from being expressed ? While my communities are being annihilated, living under bombs or the fear of bombs, YBCAs characterization of the systematic killing of 30,000+ Palestinians and the United States complicity in it as an ongoing conflict, and its censorship of artists, continues to erase our larger region, Asgary said.

Asgary traces this hyperinvisibilization back to how SWANA artists have been treated by institutions for decades. By featuring slogans like Woman Life Freedom on the marquee, which was literally displayed above where I was working, but remaining silent on Gaza, theyre hiding behind a social justice facade, while really just tokenizing the artists they need for that validity. Its another form of Orientalization.

Oakland artist Leila Weefurs contribution to Bay Area Now 9 is The Chapel of Becoming, a film and architectural work that celebrates the transgender community, queers Abrahamic traditions, and examines systems of belonging in Black and queer lives. The installation includes the words Come To Be in large letters on a public-facing glass wall of the building.

For their act of protest, they made 8 1/2 x 11 stickers with the message The Chapel of Becoming supports Palestine. Free Gaza which they placed to adorn their installation.

We came together and altered our work to make visible our allyship with Gaza and Palestine, which mirrors our immediate and extreme closeness as a community within the arts, they told me. If one of us is censored, weve all been censored.

I am very connected to this arts community. When I encounter censorship from an institution that Im developing a relationship with, it negatively impacts my ability to build unless there is accountability, Weefur said.

During the action, from my vantage point, we received a lot of support from the crowd that was there. The public feels hungry for institutions to support Gaza and Palestine. YBCA claims to support artists and their extended communities. Our action should fuel the institution to be an agent of change, but their lack of support is glaring.

Weefur sees Love Letter to Gaza as an opening for YBCA to reclaim its responsibility. This is an opportunity for YBCA to be a leader, in really being responsive and listening to the needs of the communityand the artists its claiming to serve. We have given them this opportunity to step up. We are making them relevant.

Its a shame that by closing their doors after the action, theyve chosen more censorship, by postponing the Fresh Festival, which includes other Black and Brown artists, Weefur said. Thats a step in the wrong direction.

My hope is that YBCA and all Bay Area institutions recognize the collective power of artiststhat they work with, celebrate, and uphold artists voices. That is the romantic idea they claim to support, and yet they are never prepared for what this really means when artists rise up together and speak out.

I reached out to YBCA about the charges that Jeffrey Cheung and Lukaza Branfman-Verissimo had been censored. Below is the full reply from Sara Fenske Bahat, CEO of YBCA:

Our mission at YBCA is to be a gathering space for creative expression that fosters meaningful connection for all. In support of our mission, Bay Area Now 9 was curated to provide Bay Area artists with an opportunity to showcase their voices from across different cultures, ethnicities, and perspectives. We work closely with all of our artists to realize their works and, in serving the communities of the larger Bay Area, we are committed to providing a safe space for exploring this diversity of thought and expression.

Last night during our Love Letter to SOMA free Thursday night event, a few of the 30 artists featured in Bay Area Now 9 altered or covered their exhibited work as part of a demonstration in support of Palestine.

Jeff Cheung created a mural for an outdoor space at YBCA. Jeffs design, featuring dancing/embracing figures, went through the approval process at YBCA and was approved. After the deadline for printing the work, Jeff submitted a new image that had been changed from what was previously approved, featuring a different drawing with all of the figures using the colors of the Palestinian flag.

Because the work was intended to be displayed publicly on the exterior of a city building, the curators shared in writing with Jeff:

As you are aware, public art is both a powerful opportunity, and it also amplifies the need for deliberate care. When it comes to presenting work on the exterior of our building, we have little opportunity to provide context around the authorship and intentions of the work; the audience includes passersby who have not chosen to attend YBCA exhibitions nor programming; and there are stakeholders and partners who may be inadvertently implicated or impacted. The processes and deadlines for this project were structured to make sure we could manage all of these considerations, including the involvement and approval of city entities, neighborhood partners, and funders. Given all this, were not in the position to make significant changes that alter the original tone nor focus of the mural, especially so close to finalization.

Jeff conveyed his unhappiness with the decision, and proposed a design with one grouping of figures in colors representing the colors of the Palestinian flag. The curators approved the change, and moved forward with production of the new image. In addition, the curators invited Jeff to work with them to identify additional opportunities to share his perspective through programming, engagement, and dialogue.

In regards to Lukaza Branfman-Verissimo, this past year, Lukaza was commissioned to create a public artwork on our 3rd Street exterior (initially the loading dock door, which was then extended to include a series of nearby building exit doors). Alongside their artwork, they submitted a poetic text. The curators suggested including an excerpt (We Fly for a Liberated We, We Rooted in Flight) on YBCAs external marquee, to support the unveiling of the public art piece.

Lukaza responded positively, and suggested adding Free Palestine, or if not, to keep as you proposed but make sure to include some recent pieces of mine about Palestine in our social media post announcing this marquee. Lukaza later changed their mind and no longer felt comfortable putting the excerpt on the marquee if Free Palestine wasnt added to it. Throughout the process, YBCA offered to explore options to highlight their advocacy work through programming and/or on our platforms. Lukaza did not respond to that offer, but continued to collaborate with us on the installation of their public artwork.

In these instances and across all artist projects, YBCA strives to be honest, transparent, and forthright collaborators in supporting artists voices and approaches. YBCA is committed to providing a safe space for diversity of thought and expression, even when that is challenging, which is perhaps when it is most necessary to do so. Central to BAN9 and to YBCA as an institution is being in dialogue with a wide range of perspectives and means of creative expression from across the Bay Area.

Go here to see the original:
Artists alter, deface their own work at YBCA to protest Gaza silence and decry censorship - 48 hills - 48 Hills

National Science Foundation spent millions on AI censorship tools to quash ‘misinformation’ – Washington Times

The National Science Foundation spent millions of taxpayer dollars developing censorship tools powered by artificial intelligence that Big Tech could use to counter misinformation online and advance state-of-the-art misinformation research.

House investigators on the Judiciary Committee and Select Committee on the Weaponization of Government said the NSF awarded nearly $40 million, including $13 million to three universities and a software company, to develop AI tools that could censor information far faster and at a much greater scale than human beings.

The University of Michigan, for instance, was awarded $750,000 from NSF to develop its WiseDex artificial intelligence tool to help Big Tech outsource the responsibility of censorship on social media. University researchers promoted the tool as a way to get people off our backs for how we act on misinfo and do things we know work without backlash.

In an interim staff report released Tuesday by lawmakers on the two panels, investigators say the NSF forged ahead with the project despite evidence it clearly understood its actions amounted to censorship.

Lawmakers say NSF officials tried to hide their actions from the media and to curb negative scrutiny by blacklisting conservative outlets and legal scholar Jonathan Turley, who were all writing about or investigating the foundations funding of the development of social media censorship tools.

Foundation officials intentionally removed videos and hid public information about funding for the program in response to requests from news outlets they disliked. NSF officials also rejected media requests from outlets that produced coverage they deemed negative.

In a Feb. 2, 2023, email to officials at six universities participating in the AI censorship tool program, NSF Program Director Michael Pozmantier warned about groups that want to frame the projects in a negative light.

He told the institutions that NSF is not responding to requests from people who are interested in attacking our programs or your projects. Its best if you also ignore it.

Media outlets shunned by the NSF included The Daily Caller and Just the News, both conservative online news sites that wrote about the project.

The release of the interim report follows new revelations that the Biden White House pressured Amazon to censor books about the COVID-19 vaccine and comes months after court documents revealed White House officials leaned on Twitter, Facebook, YouTube and other sites to remove posts and ban users whose content they opposed, even threatening the social media platforms with federal action.

House investigators say the NSF project is potentially more dangerous because of the scale and speed of censorship that artificial intelligence could enable.

AI-driven tools can monitor online speech at a scale that would far outmatch even the largest team of disinformation bureaucrats and researchers, House investigators wrote in the interim report.

The NSF-funded projects threaten to help create a censorship regime that could significantly impede the fundamental First Amendment rights of millions of Americans and potentially do so in a manner that is instantaneous and largely invisible to its victims.

Massachusetts Institute of Technology received $750,000 from NSF for its Search Lit platform and the University of Wisconsin-Madison took $5.75 million in federal funds to develop its CourseCorrect tool.

The foundation paid the nonprofit software company Meedan $5.75 million to build its Co-Insights program that would use AI to combat so-called misinformation. When Meedan applied for the hefty grant, company officials pitched its relationships with WhatsApp, Telegram and Signal as a way to develop a tool that would proactively identify and limit susceptibility to misinformation and pseudoscientific information online. Methods would include open-web crawling and controversy detection identifying possible content for fact-checking.

The team at Meedan boasted to the NSF it was using AI to monitor 750,000 blogs and media articles daily in addition to mining data from major social media platforms, the report said.

The presentation slides used in their pitch, obtained by House lawmakers, provided insight into what the company had determined to be misinformation. It included undermining trust in the mainstream media and cited as an example criticism of the New York Times for ignoring Black-on-Asian hate crimes in its coverage.

The company said it would also monitor and respond to fearmongering and anti-Black narratives, glorifying vigilantism and weakening political participation.

Scott Hale, director of research at Meedan, wrote to Mr. Pozmantier at NSF in November 2022 and expounded on his dream world for an even larger AI censorship network that could have full access to all of the data social media platforms had removed from their sites. The data enclave, Mr. Hale said, could be used by researchers to run code against to produce aggregate analyses and benchmark different automated detection approaches without ever having direct access to the data.

Lawmakers on the two committees said NSF has stonewalled their investigation and only provided roughly 300 pages of requested documents. The panels will weigh legislative solutions, including blocking NSF from funding AI censorship projects.

The technology is poised to expand.

Lawmakers pointed out that Meedan officials, in their presentation to NSF, determined the content moderation solutions market in 2022 was $10 billion.

The Washington Times reached out to NSF, but did not immediately receive a response.

See more here:
National Science Foundation spent millions on AI censorship tools to quash 'misinformation' - Washington Times

Supreme Court Deliberates on Government’s Influence on Covid Misinformation – Health News – Medriva

The Supreme Court and the Battle Against Covid Misinformation

The Supreme Court is currently deliberating on a pivotal case that revolves around the governments influence on social media censorship of Covid-19 misinformation. This case presents a unique intersection of public health and First Amendment rights, a balancing act that has significant implications for the future of social media regulation and free speech in the United States.

At the heart of the case is the governments request to tech giants to moderate Covid-19 misinformation. This led to a law enacted by the California Governor that barred medical professionals from spreading misinformation. However, a federal appeals court has issued a temporary order barring the federal government from contacting social media platforms, pending Supreme Court review.

The ongoing debate presents two different perspectives. From a public health viewpoint, misinformation is seen as a threat to effective pandemic management. On the other hand, proponents of free speech argue that government involvement may infringe upon constitutional rights.

Its not the first time that the government has been accused of overstepping its bounds in the name of public health. It was reported that the Biden administration pressured Amazon to censor books related to COVID-19 vaccines in early 2021, citing concerns of propaganda and misinformation. Amazon initially resisted but eventually yielded to pressure from the White House. This incident has added fuel to the lawsuit alleging that the Biden administration colluded with social media companies to suppress freedom of speech related to the COVID-19 pandemic.

COVID-19 misinformation, spread through social media, mass media, and other platforms, has had a profound impact on public health. Conspiracy theories have been propagated on preprint servers, and politicians and public figures have played a role in promoting false information. News organizations have also been implicated in the spread of misinformation, highlighting potential political motives behind the propagation of false COVID-19 information.

Such misinformation not only undermines public trust in health institutions but also hampers the global response to the pandemic. Effective management of the pandemic heavily relies on the publics compliance with health measures, which misinformation can significantly undermine.

While the Supreme Courts decision is eagerly awaited, its evident that the issue of misinformation extends beyond just legal deliberations. The rise of AI-generated disinformation, for instance, poses an entirely new set of challenges. Deepfake videos and audio used to spread disinformation during elections have raised alarm bells, underscoring the need for robust interventions.

Experts have suggested developing watermarking and detection tools, prebunking interventions, and robust monitoring regimes to counter the impact of AI-generated disinformation. However, the implementation and success of such interventions heavily depend on the legal backdrop that the Supreme Courts decision will shape. The outcome of this case will indeed shape the future of public health, free speech, and social media regulation in the United States.

See the rest here:
Supreme Court Deliberates on Government's Influence on Covid Misinformation - Health News - Medriva

Biden White House pressured Amazon to censor books that countered Covid government party line – Must Read Alaska

Immediately after taking office, the Biden administration pressured Amazon tonot promote books that doubted the efficacy or safety of Covid-19 vaccinesin early 2021.

The White House was concerned about books that contained propaganda or misinformation, according to Amazon company emails that were released by Ohio Rep. Jim Jordan, chair of the House Judiciary Committee and Subcommittee on the Weaponization of the Federal Government via subpoena.

On Monday, Jordan released THE AMAZON FILES on X/Twitter. They feature Andrew Slavic, the former Biden senior advisor for Covid-19, writing to the worlds largest seller of books that he found some of the books to be concerning.

Who can we talk to about the high levels of propaganda and misinformation and disinformation of [sic] Amazon? wrote Slavitt to Amazon on March 2, 2021. Later in the same day, he pestered the company: If you search for vaccines under books, I see what comes up. I havent looked beyond that but if thats whats on the surface, its concerning.

An Amazon thread of emails shows that the company would then covertly take action.

We will not be doing a manual intervention today, says one email between Amazon executives. The team/PR feels very strongly that it is too visible, and will further compound the Harry/Sally narrative (which is getting the Fox News treatment today apparently), and wont fix the problem long-term because of customer behavior associates.

One Amazon official noted that another employee was given very direct guidance to the teams to be boring and not do anything that is visible and will draw more attention.

What Amazon did at the behest of the White House was to hide books, not promote books, and redirect customers to other books, or to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention when they entered keywords in the search box.

Read THE AMAZON FILES at this link.

View post:
Biden White House pressured Amazon to censor books that countered Covid government party line - Must Read Alaska

Family Book Shop: DeLand bookstore displays banned books – WESH 2 Orlando

FROM FLORIDA SCHOOLS, ONE WOMAN IS HOPING TO DRAW ATTENTION TO THE HARMS OF CENSORSHIP. WESH VOLUSIA COUNTY REPORTER PAMELA COHEN CAUGHT UP WITH THE OWNER OF A DELAND BOOK SHOP WHO SET UP A PERMANENT DISPLAY SHOWING FACING THOSE BANNED BOOKS. STORY A TRUE STORY OF. ONCE YOU WALK THROUGH THE DOORS OF FAMILY BOOK SHOP IN DELAND, YOULL FIND THIS DISPLAY A BOOKSHELF DRESSED WITH YELLOW CAUTION TAPE AND A SIGN THAT SAYS BANNED BOOKS. WE HAVE DONE THIS FOR YEARS AND YEARS TO JUST TO LET PEOPLE KNOW WHATS OUT THERE EVERY YEAR AT THE END OF SEPTEMBER, KAREN JOHNSON SETS UP THIS DISPLAY FOR BANNED BOOK WEEK, AND ITS ONLY UP FOR SEVEN DAYS. THIS YEAR, SHE DECIDED TO KEEP IT UP PERMANENTLY. THIS YEAR ITS GOTTEN A LOT MORE CONTROVERSIAL, SO WE DECIDED TO KEEP THE BANNED BOOKS DISPLAY UP ALL YEAR BECAUSE IT BRINGS IN A LOT OF PEOPLE AND A LOT OF PEOPLE WANT TO KNOW ABOUT IT. THIS ALL COMES AFTER A WAVE OF BOOK CHALLENGES IN FLORIDA SCHOOLS. HER DISPLAY SHOWCASES BANNED BOOKS ACROSS U.S. PUBLIC LIBRARIES AND SCHOOLS. EACH TITLE HAS A POST-IT NOTE EXPLAINING WHY IT WAS TAKEN OFF THE SHELF, AND MOST OF THE TIME WHEN SOMEONE COMES THROUGH THEIR DOORS, THEY GET THE SAME REACTION. OH MY GOSH, I READ THAT IN SCHOOL. I CANT UNDERSTAND WHY IT WOULD BE THAT WAY OR THIS IS A GOOD BOOK. I DONT UNDERSTAND WHAT IT WOULD BE CONTROVERSIAL ABOUT IT. SO YEAH, SO IT GETS PEOPLE THINKING. AND SINCE PUTTING UP THIS SECTION, BOOKS LIKE AND TANGO MAKES THREE HAVE BEEN SELLING RATHER QUICKLY IN THE LAST THREE MONTHS. THEYVE SOLD ABOUT 12 COPIES OF THIS BOOK. WHEN IN PREVIOUS YEARS THEYVE ONLY SOLD 1 OR 2. ALL THE BANNED BOOKS ARE GETTING MUCH MORE ATTENTION THAN THEY DID BEFORE. JOHNSON WILL CONTINUE TO MAKE SURE HER CUSTOMERS HAVE OPTIONS. YOU KNOW, MAYBE WHAT YOU LIKE ISNT WHAT SOMEBODY ELSE LIKES OR VICE VERSA. SO YOU KNOW, IT ISNT FOR US TO SAY ITS FOR US TO PROVIDE YOU THE OPPORTUNITY TO FIND WHAT YOU

Florida bookshop owner aims to draw attention to harms of censorship with 'Banned Books' display

Updated: 7:00 PM EST Feb 2, 2024

Once you walk through the doors of Family Book Shop in DeLand, you'll find a display dressed with yellow caution tape and a sign that reads "Banned Books.""We have done this for years and years just to let people know what's out there," said Kaaren Johnson, Family Book shop owner. Every year, at the end of September, Johnson sets up a display for Banned Book Week, and it's usually only up for seven days.This year, she decided to keep it up permanently."It's gotten a lot more controversial," she said. "So, we decided to keep the banned books displayed all year because it brings in a lot of people. A lot of people want to know about it."This all comes after a wave of book challenges in Florida schools. Johnson's display showcases books banned across U.S. schools and public libraries.Each title has a post-it note explaining why it was taken off the shelf. Most of the time when someone comes through their doors, they all have a similar reaction."'Oh, my gosh, I read that in school,'" Johnson said. "'I can't understand why it would be that way.' Or, 'This is a good book. I don't understand what it would be controversial.' It gets people thinking."Since putting up the section, books like "And Tango Makes Three" have been selling quicker than usual.In the last three months, they sold about 12 copies of the book, when in the last years, they were lucky to even sell one or two. All the banned books are getting much more attention than they did before.Johnson will continue to make sure her customers have options."You know, maybe what you like is and what somebody else likes or vice versa," she said. "So, you know, it isn't for us to say, it's for us to provide you the opportunity to find what you want."Top headlines: Officials: 3 dead after plane crashes into Florida mobile home parkFlorida Highway Patrol says trooper killed in crash while in the line of duty Sheriff: Violent Marion County crash involving stolen deputy vehicle kills 3, injures 1

Once you walk through the doors of Family Book Shop in DeLand, you'll find a display dressed with yellow caution tape and a sign that reads "Banned Books."

"We have done this for years and years just to let people know what's out there," said Kaaren Johnson, Family Book shop owner.

Every year, at the end of September, Johnson sets up a display for Banned Book Week, and it's usually only up for seven days.

This year, she decided to keep it up permanently.

"It's gotten a lot more controversial," she said. "So, we decided to keep the banned books displayed all year because it brings in a lot of people. A lot of people want to know about it."

This all comes after a wave of book challenges in Florida schools. Johnson's display showcases books banned across U.S. schools and public libraries.

Each title has a post-it note explaining why it was taken off the shelf.

Most of the time when someone comes through their doors, they all have a similar reaction.

"'Oh, my gosh, I read that in school,'" Johnson said. "'I can't understand why it would be that way.' Or, 'This is a good book. I don't understand what it would be controversial.' It gets people thinking."

Since putting up the section, books like "And Tango Makes Three" have been selling quicker than usual.

In the last three months, they sold about 12 copies of the book, when in the last years, they were lucky to even sell one or two.

All the banned books are getting much more attention than they did before.

Johnson will continue to make sure her customers have options.

"You know, maybe what you like is and what somebody else likes or vice versa," she said. "So, you know, it isn't for us to say, it's for us to provide you the opportunity to find what you want."

Top headlines:

View original post here:
Family Book Shop: DeLand bookstore displays banned books - WESH 2 Orlando