Mediaboss Marketing

Censorship? More like "censorsh*t," am I right? Censorship is one of those topics we do not hear about too often, but when we do, we are furious.

A fundamental concept of the First Amendment, freedom of speech is an American fan favorite that we pride ourselves on.

Recently, censorship has been prominent in the news in the United States and countries around the world. Here at home, SOPA (Stop Online Piracy Act) has been the ultimate threat of an Internet troll for quite some time.

It was created in the hope of stopping online trafficking in counterfeiting and piracy.

If enacted, it will not "shut down the internet" like every middle schooler on Tumblr thought, but it will block access to sites that allow copyright violated or pirated downloading and linking.

So what does that mean? There would be noFacebook, YouTube, MediaFire, SoundCloud, Twitter, DropBox or any other site that can be targeted as a place where online piracy could take place.

No Twitter? But I put jokes up there. It's my lifeline (@MaeveMcDonough #shamelessplug).

Many blogs would also be shut down. Everyone would be responsible for what they put on their blog or website and if it does have copyright infringement, consider it gone. This threat to our right to be an Internet dweller should make us realize how lucky we really are.

In Cuba this week, Project Censored, an American nonprofit organization dedicated to media criticism and investigative journalism, made its case to a conference of Cuban authors and journalists hosted by Fidel Castro.

It's been more than 50 years since a bad word about Cuba was uttered in any sort of national media. After Project Censored's failed conference, it's going to stay that way.

See the article here:
SOPA small beans compared to international censorship

The opening bedroom scene of Andrea Juillerat-Olvera's new, erotic science-fiction novel Demon's Grace is a classic of its kind. "He is on his knees," it begins, "worshiping the cavernous female torso."

Sadly, for admirers of Juillerat-Olvera, it's about to get harder to enjoy her fruity pose. In what victims are calling the most far-reaching act of censorship of the internet era, Demon's Grace and thousands of books like it have just been effectively banned. To blame is the online payment company PayPal, which has a virtual monopoly over the business of allowing cash transfers to be made via the internet.

The US firm has come to dominate online self-publishing, a rapidly expanding industry which allows authors sell ebooks directly to readers. Last week, without warning, PayPal wrote to every major self-publishing website, announcing that henceforth it will refuse to process payments for clients that sell books which contain certain types of what it regards as "obscene" content.

From now on, the firm said, it will begin aggressively prohibiting erotic literature which contains scenes of bestiality, rape, incest and under-age sex. Ebook websites that sell such works will have their PayPal accounts deactivated. "It's underhanded, unfair and ludicrous, and it bodes badly for the future of free speech and expression," said Juillerat-Olvera, adding that Demon's Grace is now banned by self-publishing sites.

Mark Coker, the founder of Smashwords, one of the world's largest such sites, said the announcement has so far caused roughly 1,000 of the 100,000 novels that he stocks to be withdrawn from sale. "Regardless of whether you or I want to read these books, this is perfectly legal fiction and people have a right to publish it," he told The Independent on Sunday. "It surely isn't for some financial services company to control what is written by an author."

Mr Coker said that attempting to enforce PayPal's effective ban is likely to be impossible. "They say they won't have rape, bestiality or incest presented in a way that might titillate. But deciding what constitutes titillation is completely subjective," he said. "The Bible has incest in it, and rape. Nabokov's literature does. Should we ban the sale of those books?"

PayPal's move is odd because its founder, Peter Thiel, proudly bills himself as one of America's leading libertarians. In a statement, the Silicon Valley firm claimed: "In general, PayPal does allow our service to be used for the sale of erotic books, but we have to draw the line on certain adult content that is extreme or potentially illegal." The firm added that the decision does not represent an effort to impose a morality on the reading public.

Vella Munn, who writes under the name Vonna Harper, said that the guidelines will ban the most successful novel from her back catalogue, Carnal Captives. "It contains a scene of non-consensual sex," she said. "But that doesn't make the book illegal. Given that it sells more copies than all my other books combined, I have to conclude that it's what people want. It's incredible: how can an internet company not believe in free speech?"

Read the original post:
Self-publishers accuse PayPal of censorship

ISLAMABAD, Pakistan Media censorship is nothing new in Pakistan, where military dictators come and go. But newly proposed rules to ban TV programming deemed against the national interest spring from an unlikely source: a civilian government that has prided itself on inching the country toward democracy over the past four years.

The proposals were issued last month by a media regulatory body that says it is responding to public complaints about an explosion of increasingly shrill, fact-twisting and privacy-invading cable news shows. But the draft measures also take pointed aim at coverage that criticizes the organs of the state or undermines Pakistans solidarity as an independent and sovereign country.

Graphic

The two countries are allies but their relationship has been plagued by mistrust over the last 50 years.

Besides condemning the restrictions as impossibly vague, some foes of censorship see the powerful hand of Pakistans military behind them. Any ban on purported anti-state news would extend to coverage of the secessionist movement in Baluchistan, a province where the army and internal intelligence agencies are accused of extrajudicial killings of nationalists.

Last week the interior minister, Rehman Malik, asked cable news channels to stop booking Baluch separatist leaders on talk shows, saying the rebels were spreading propaganda about forced disappearances.

Government officials say the proposed restrictions are not meant to intimidate or impose censorship on the media but are instead intended to prod the raucous TV news industry to regulate itself.

You have to define certain rules for their own betterment, Firdous Ashiq Awan, the minister of information and broadcasting, said in an interview. Its not that government wants it; the whole nation wants it. There must be some rules and regulations.

The prospect of such government intrusion unnerves free-speech advocates, who have watched an emboldened media take on civilian as well as military leaders in recent years. The Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority, which operates under the information minister, contends that its proposals are benign, but the agency has the power to punish alleged violations by imposing fines and pulling broadcast licenses.

The governments goal is not to educate the media or the public, said Hamza Farooq, a Karachi journalist who has worked at CNBC Pakistan and Geo TV, a leading broadcaster. They are just trying to pressure the media.

Continued here:
Pakistan proposes curbs on raucous media

Web censors got their signals crossed in China and Denmark this week.

Users at an Internet cafe in Beijing last May. (LIU JIN - AFP/GETTY IMAGES) A supposed glitch in Chinas Great Firewall on Tuesday allowed Internet users in the country to access Facebook, YouTube, Twitter and Google+ for a brief time until the sites were blocked again, Reuters reported. Chinese netizens flooded President Obama'sGoogle+ page with comments, many asking the president to fight for human rights in China.

In Denmark, however, Internet freedom went in the other direction. Danish police said a human errorcaused thousands of Web sites to be blocked in the country on Thursday, including Google and Facebook, reported file-sharing news site Torrentfreak. Users who tried to access those sites got a message saying Denmarks High Tech Crime Unit had blocked the page because the user had offered child pornography. The problem was reportedly fixed several hours later.

Web censorship, a hot topic around the world, is becoming harder for governments to enforce.

In India, Internet companies recently refused a government request to screen and remove what it deemed offensive contentrelated to political leaders and religious figures.

During Irans partial Internet blackout last month, Iranians used proxy servers10 times more than they had in 2010.

And when China suffered a major train crash last July, government censors forced the media to stopreporting online about what had gone wrong but users on Weibo, Chinas Twitter, soon filled the news gap.

According to Googles Transparency Report for the first half of 2011, democracies and authoritarian governments alike made repeated requests to Google to remove certain online content from its services. Sometimes, the government believed the content was a threat to national security. Other times, the reason given was defamation or government criticism.

Related reading:

Web censorship moves to democracies

Read the original post:
In China, Denmark, glitches in Web censorship confuse users

* New media (Berlin: 4NM.BE - news) watchdog does not mean more censorship-report

* New council to cover all media platforms

* Wider reviews on media convergence, ownership under way (Adds detail)

CANBERRA, March 2 (Reuters) - An Australian inquiry sparked by concerns about journalistic practices at Rupert Murdoch's News Corp on Friday recommended a new body to set and enforce standards across the country's tightly owned media.

The inquiry was launched following Murdoch's News of the World phone hacking scandal in Britain and after criticism by some politicians of biased coverage by Murdoch newspapers of the Australia government.

Australian media is among the world's most concentrated, with Murdoch's News Ltd controlling some 70 percent of the country's newspaper ownership. Murdoch's main newspaper rival in of Australia is the Fairfax Media Group.

The independent report, released by the Australian government, called for a "News Media Council" to set media standards and handle complaints made by the public.

"The establishment of a council is not about increasing the power of government or about imposing some form of censorship," the report said.

"It is about making the news media more accountable to those covered in the news, and to the public generally."

It recommended that the new body cover news and current affairs coverage on all platforms, print, online, radio and television, replacing the Australian Press council which only handles complaints against print media.

Follow this link:
UPDATE 1-Australian media inquiry recommends new watchdog