Archive for the ‘Censorship’ Category

IFEX Communiqué Vol 21, No 13

Vol. 21 No. 13 | 28 March 2012 Headlines ________________________________________

International: Index on Censorship opens up archive to mark 40th birthday, announces free expression award winners

Syria: On eve of peace plan, three more journalists killed

Bahrain: At least 31 extrajudicial killings since official commission of inquiry, says Bahrain Center for Human Rights

Sri Lanka: State media outlets label journalists "traitors"

Mali: Independent media one of the first casualties in coup

Kazakhstan: IFEX members help get editor out of jail

Europe and Central Asia: Reporters Without Borders demands access to Europe's migrant detention centres

Free Expression Spotlight ________________________________________

INTERNATIONAL: INDEX ON CENSORSHIP OPENS UP ARCHIVE TO MARK 40TH BIRTHDAY, ANNOUNCES FREE EXPRESSION AWARD WINNERS Index on Censorship is celebrating 40 years of existence, and wants you to be a part of it. In honour of the 40th anniversary, Index's publisher Sage has opened up the Index archive to the public for 40 days starting this week. Plus, hot off the press: the winners of Index's Free Expression Awards! Read more>>

View original post here:
IFEX Communiqué Vol 21, No 13

Vatican’s Stem-Cell Censorship Sham

The Catholic Church has never had a particularly easy relationship with science. After all, this is the institution that sentenced Galileo Galilei as a heretic for his theories on the universe during the Roman Inquisition. Two thousand years later, the church forgave Galileo and called the whole misunderstanding a tragic mutual incomprehension but it remains safe to say the Vatican doesnt have a great track record when it comes to empirical open-mindedness.

So onlookers were surprised when the Vatican announced it would be hosting a global conference on the highly controversial issue of stem-cell research in Rome over four days in late April. The church held a similar conference in 2010 and 2011, which focused on its recommendation that stem-cell research should be limited to adult cells that can be harvested from live donors, not embryonic cells that destroy the source. But this years conference schedule featured some of the worlds foremost experts in embryonic research as keynote speakersleading some scientists to think that the Vatican might actually be looking for enlightenment on the topic.

That was not exactly case. Instead, the Vatican seems to have hoped that by including embryonic researchers in the program, it would appear that these scientists actually endorsed the Vaticans stance.

It might have worked to some extent, but after some of the speakers declined to censor their speeches, the Vatican abruptly canceled the conference altogether. According to the conference website, the event was canceled due to serious economic and logistic-organizational reasons that have completely jeopardized the success of the 3rd International Congress on Responsible Stem Cell Research. The scientists who were planning to attend say they are being stifled instead. I think the only interpretation is that we are being censored, Alan Trounson, president of the California Institute for Regenerative Medicine in San Francisco, said in a statement. It is very disappointing that they are unwilling to hear the truth.

Just what was the Vatican thinking? Inviting embryonic stem-cell researchers to a conference and then denying them the right to talk about their field of expertise was a major gamble. Had the speakers agreed to avoid reference to embryonic research, it would have given the disingenuous impression that they endorse the Holy Sees recommendation on adult stem-cell research only. Did the Vatican really think they could control the scientific community? Apparently so. Father Scott Borgman of the Pontifical Academy for Life, which co-organized the conference, had reportedly asked the speakers to limit their discussions to adult stem-cell research only. George Daly, a leading embryonic researcher with the Childrens Hospital in Boston, says he was actually told not to make embryonic researchhis field of expertisea focal point of his talk. When he told Borgman that he would still be touching on the topic in a historical context, higher-ups in the Vatican reportedly panicked. I had been encouraged to think that the Congress would be a forum for discussion of many areas of common interest to the Vatican and stem cell scientists, regardless of the disagreements over embryonic stem cells, Daly told The Daily Beast. We should all agree that clinical trials of new medical treatments based on stem cells should proceed according to rigorous principles to ensure patients are kept as safe as possible and free from exploitation. And we should all agree that premature claims of therapeutic efficacy and direct marketing of unproven interventions to vulnerable patients is a threat to legitimate attempts to develop experimental stem cell medicines.

Pope Benedict looks on during the mass in solemnity of the chair of St. Peter with new Cardinals in St. Peter's basilica at the Vatican on February 19, 2012. The Vatican stands by its decision to cancel the controversial conference as having a purely business motive. , Alberto Pizzoli, AFP / Getty Images

With the cancelation of the event, discourse between the two diverse entities will not have a venue. One Vatican official told the Catholic News Service that many of the Vaticans leaders were secretly glad the conference failed. I am infinitely relieved that the church has avoided a major blunder which would have confused the faithful for decades to come, the unnamed source said. The Holy Spirit has certainly shown to be present through those faithful members who drew attention to the ambiguity of the choice of speakers. I hope and pray that a review will be affected of the basis on which these congresses are planned.

Some stem-cell researchers are also relieved the conference wont go on. I personally am very uncomfortable with a scientific meeting run by a church, and one at which only certain types of science and scientists are allowed to attend, blogged Paul Knoepfler, an associate professor of Cell Biology and Human Anatomy at UC Davis School of Medicine who blogs about stem cell research at IPCell.com. Also I cant help but wonder, what would be the reaction if someone like Daley spent a few minutes of his talk discussing his embryonic cell research in a very nonconfrontational way? Would he be tasered or drop through some trap door straight to Hell?

Still, Knoepfler was hopeful. I view the canceled Vatican stem-cell meeting as a missed opportunity for a very much needed, open dialogue about stem cells, he told The Daily Beast. More specifically, I believe the reasons for the cancellation reflect an anti-scientific attitude by the highest level of Vatican leaders. More simply put, the attitude might be summed up by the phrase If you do not think like us, you are not welcome at our meeting, and well go so far as to cancel the whole thing to avoid your presence.

Inviting embryonic stem-cell researchers to a conference and then denying them the right to talk about their field of expertise was a major gamble.

Visit link:
Vatican’s Stem-Cell Censorship Sham

Myanmar pledges end to censorship laws

Published: March. 29, 2012 at 2:00 PM

NAYPYITAW, Myanmar, March 29 (UPI) -- Officials say Myanmar's notoriously strict 50-year-old censorship laws may be a thing of the past with a pledge from the Ministry of Information to end to them.

Myanmar, which has some of the strictest censorship laws in the world, has not had a free press since 1962. While the censorship laws have recently loosened, censors still have the power to nix stories on sensitive subjects, such as the formation of labor unions.

Voice of America reported Ye Htut of the Ministry of Information said in a recent workshop on media freedom censorship laws would be scrapped by the end of the year, as the new government drafts media law to replace them.

"We want to maintain the stability and law and order in our country. In the previous government before 1962, there's a press freedom in our country," Htut said. "And instead of informing the general public, media themselves created a crisis."

While the end to censorship has created a buzz among journalists, they worry about the cutthroat competition that could ensue.

"It's going to be a bloodbath," said Ross Dunkley, publisher of the English language weekly, The Myanmar Times. "I mean, that's the absolute truth ... you get some [daily newspapers] up and running, then I figure you're going to see in the first year of the dailies at least 100 publications die."

See original here:
Myanmar pledges end to censorship laws

Burma Pledges to Loosen Notorious Censorship Laws

Burma has some of the strictest censorship laws in the world, but the new government has started drafting a new media law that is anticipated to make major changeson the media environment under reform in Rangoon.

Newspapers bearing the once banned image of democracy leader Aung San Suu Kyi are fairly common nowadays in Rangoon. But the 50-year-old censorship laws, a relic of the socialist era, are still in effect.

We want to maintain the stability and law and order in our country in the previous government before 1962 theres a press freedom in our country. And instead of informing the general public media themselves created a crisis," he said.

Exile media groups also attended. For some, it was their first visit home in 23 years. Toe Zaw Latt is the bureau chief of the Democratic Voice of Burma.

"Yesterday the information minister was here. He openly said they are willing to change and take reform, which was very encouraging. He said the state's role of media development is to facilitate, not to control, which is quite an amazing statement from a responsible party," he said.

Though editors and journalists already anticipate the end of censorship, the newfound freedom is accompanied by uncertainty in a competitive market for publishers like Ross Dunkley of the English language weekly The Myanmar Times.

"It's going to be a bloodbath. I mean, that's the absolute truth is that you get some [daily newspapers] up and running, then I figure you're going to see in the first year of the dailies at least 100 publications die," he said.

Some topics are still sensitive, such as the formation of labor unions. Last week, a story in the Myanmar Times about the first meeting of what will be Burma's new independent journalists union was cut by censors.

The only daily newspapers, such as The New Light of Myanmar, are published by the state. But new liberal laws could mean independent daily news for the first time since 1962.

The union is still drafting its constitution, and it is still unclear what will replace the ministry of information as an independent regulatory body. Associated Press correspondent Aye Aye Win is one of the co-founders of the new union.

View original post here:
Burma Pledges to Loosen Notorious Censorship Laws

Censorship Isn't Funny

Ever since its launch in 1970, Gary Trudeaus Doonesbury comic strip has pushed the envelope with frank, daring and funny examinations of contemporary issues.

A couple of weeks ago Doonesbury pushed the envelope a little too far for a lot of newspapers, including The Oregonian and Bends only daily, The Bulletin.

The offending strips focused on a batshit-crazy Texas law that requires women seeking an abortion to see ultrasound images of the fetus. In some cases obtaining such images requires inserting a probe-like instrument (called a shaming wand in the Doonesbury strip) into the womans vagina.

The Doonesbury strips contained some blunt language words like transvaginal and genitals but no words or images that were obscene. Nevertheless, the editors at The Bulletin and The Oregonian and at about 60 other American newspapers decided they were too hot to handle. They chose instead to publish old alternative strips provided by Trudeaus syndicate.

In a column last Sunday, Bulletin Editor John Costa tried to explain the decision. It wasnt that The Bulletin had any problem with the political position Trudeau was taking, Costa assured his readers. The Texas law, he wrote, is one that The Bulletin, a pro-choice newspaper, would vehemently oppose editorially if it were proposed in Oregon. (Thats comforting, and we intend to hold Mr. Costa to his word if the Oregon Legislature ever becomes loony enough to consider such a bill.)

No, Costa went on to say: The reason Doonesbury couldnt taint the sanctified pages of The Bulletin was that elements of it were not suitable for the predictable readership of the comics page. I didn't think it appropriate that the image of a doctor displaying the instrument he was about to insert in a woman was appropriate for the many youngsters who read the comics pages.

The Oregonian offered a similar line: The strip went over the line of good taste and humor [by] using graphic language and images inappropriate for a comics page.

The were-doing-it-to-protect-the-kiddies excuse is lame for a couple of reasons. One is that the days when the funny pages were populated by characters like Little Orphan Annie and Donald Duck are long gone; most of the strips that appear today clearly are written for adult, or at least teenage, readers. Also its hard to picture young children being mature and sophisticated enough to be devotees of Doonesbury and if they are, theyre probably not strangers to words like vagina and genitals.

We strongly suspect the real reason The Bulletin and The Oregonian decided to yank Doonesbury was fear of catching flak from their more prudish readers. And no doubt they would have.

But so what? A newspaper that doesnt ever take heat from its readers isnt doing its job. If being universally popular is an editors aim in life he should quit and become a game show host.

See the article here:
Censorship Isn't Funny