Archive for the ‘Black Lives Matter’ Category

Black Lives Matter bans white people from attending ‘open …

A Black Lives Matter chapter inPhiladelphia has banned white people from attendingan event, claiming its a black only space.

According to the April Open Meeting event page on Facebook, the gathering, scheduled for April 15, is aimed at discussing future initiatives and projects of the movement in which only black people are allowed to participate. Please note that BLM Philly is a Black only space, claims the event description.

Some people supporting the movement but who happen to not be black have requested an explanation from the group. Is it just your meetings that are black only spaces? or are all activities this way? I want to support but dont want to overstep, tweeted Esther Greenwood.

Our meetings are black centered, replied official Black Lives Matter Philly account.

Popular activist on Twitter Sharika Soal, meanwhile, slammed the decision to exclude white people from the movement. She first tweeted: All Hispanic and Whites who support #BlacklivesMatter @BLMPhilly says you are not welcome at meetings and you cant attend, and added that this is messed up.

If you identify as a person of the African Diaspora You can attend our meetings and become a member. If not you can support us in other ways, BLM Philly tweeted back, insisting on not allowing white people supporting the movement to participate.

Soal then posted a picture of Martin Luther King marching for civil rights together with other white leaders, saying: Look very closely at this photo of MLK marching for black rights. As you can see white people are with him. So why is @BLMPhilly saying no?

He made that choice and we have made ours. White people can support us but they cannot attend our meetings, BLM Philly shot back, later adding that[Malcolm X] took our same stance. White people could not attend the meetings but could support his organization.

See more here:
Black Lives Matter bans white people from attending 'open ...

NYPD officers accessed Black Lives Matter activists’ texts, documents show – The Guardian

People protest after a grand jury decided not to indict officer Daniel Pantaleo in the Eric Garner case. Photograph: Yana Paskova/Getty Images

Undercover officers in the New York police department infiltrated small groups of Black Lives Matter activists and gained access to their text messages, according to newly released NYPD documents obtained by the Guardian.

The records, produced in response to a freedom of information lawsuit led by New York law firm Stecklow & Thompson, provide the most detailed picture yet of the sweeping scope of NYPD surveillance during mass protests over the death of Eric Garner in 2014 and 2015. Lawyers said the new documents raised questions about NYPD compliance with city rules.

The documents, mostly emails between undercover officers and other NYPD officials, follow other disclosures that the NYPD regularly filmed Black Lives Matter activists and sent undercover personnel to protests. The NYPD has not responded to the Guardians request for comment or interview.

Emails show that undercover officers were able to pose as protesters even within small groups, giving them extensive access to details about protesters whereabouts and plans. In one email, an official notes that an undercover officer is embedded within a group of seven protesters on their way to Grand Central Station. This intimate access appears to have helped police pass as trusted organizers and extract information about demonstrations. In other emails, officers share the locations of individual protesters at particular times. The NYPD emails also include pictures of organizers group text exchanges with information about protests, suggesting that undercover officials were either trusted enough to be allowed to take photos of activists phones or were themselves members of a private planning group text.

That text loop was definitely just for organizers, I dont know how that got out, said Elsa Waithe, a Black Lives Matter organizer. Someone had to have told someone how to get on it, probably trusting someone they had seen a few times in good faith. We clearly compromised ourselves.

Keegan Stephan, a regular attendee of the Grand Central protests in 2014 and 2015, said information about protesters whereabouts was limited to a small group of core organizers at that time. I feel like the undercover was somebody who was or is very much a part of the group, and has access to information we only give to people we trust, said Stephan, who has been assisting attorneys with a lawsuit to obtain the documents on behalf of plaintiff James Logue, a protester. If youre walking to Grand Central with a handful of people for an action, thats much more than just showing up to a public demonstration that sounds like a level of friendship.

Joseph Giacalone, a retired NYPD detective sergeant and professor at John Jay College, agreed that it would not be easy for an undercover officer to join a small group of protesters and hear their plans. It would be pretty amazing that they would be able to get into the core group in such a short window of time, said Giacalone. This could have been going on a while before for these people to get so close to the inner circle.

The NYPD documents also included a handful of pictures and one short video taken at Grand Central Station demonstrations. Most are pictures of crowds milling about or taking part in demonstrations. In one picture of a small group of activists, the NYPD identifies an individual in a brown jacket as the main protester. These images of protesters are reminiscent of those taken by undercover transit police, who were also deployed to Black Lives Matter protests in Grand Central Station in 2015.

Giacalone said this type of leadership identification was standard police practice at protests. If you take out the biggest mouth, everybody just withers away, so you concentrate on the ones you believe are your organizers, he said. Once you identify that person, you can run computer checks on them to see if they have a warrant out or any summons failures, then you can drag them in before they go out to speak or rile up the crowd, as long as you have reasonable cause to do so.

Attorneys say the documents raise legal questions about whether the NYPD was acting in compliance with the departments intelligence-gathering rules, known as the Handschu Guidelines. The guidelines, which are based on an ongoing decades-old class-action lawsuit, hold that the NYPD can begin formally investigating first amendment activity when facts or circumstances reasonably indicate that an unlawful act has been, is being, or will be committed and if the police surveillance plan has been authorized by a committee known as the Handschu Authority. (That committee was exclusively staffed by NYPD officials at the time.) However, according to the guidelines, before launching a formal investigation, the NYPD can also conduct investigative work such as checking of leads and preliminary inquiries with even lower standards of suspicion.

Michael Price, counsel at the Brennan Center for Justice, said it was difficult to know whether NYPDs undercover surveillance operations crossed the line, as the documents did not make clear what, if any, stage of investigation the police were in at the time of the operations. But he said the departments retention of pictures and video raised questions, since police are not allowed to retain information about public events unless it relates to unlawful activity.

So my question would be: what was the unlawful activity that police had reason to suspect here? said Price. It doesnt appear that there was any criminal behavior they were talking about in the emails. Most references are to protesters being peaceful, so I would be very concerned if they were hinging their whole investigation on civil disobedience, such as unpermitted protests or blocking of pedestrians.

Throughout the emails, the NYPDs undercover sources provide little indication of any unlawful activity, frequently characterizing demonstrators as peaceful and orderly with only one mention of a single arrest.

The documents uniformly show no crime occurring, but NYPD had undercovers inside the protests for months on end as if they were al-Qaida, said David Thompson, an attorney of Stecklow & Thompson, who helped sue for the records.

Giacalone argued that police could have easily come up with a legal justification to initiate surveillance, especially if such operations occurred after the shooting of two NYPD officers in December of 2014 (all dates in the NYPDs email communications were redacted). But he noted that such investigative activities would be harder to justify if officers were not directly observing signs of unlawful activity.

If theyre not talking about any crimes being committed, theyre going to have a difficult time defending this. It may end up in another one of these lawsuits, said Giacalone. Some may say this is good police work, fine, but good police work or not, we have rules against this kind of thing in New York.

Attorneys have already filed a petition charging that the NYPD may have failed to produce all of its surveillance records. But for some protesters, the damage has already been done.

In the first couple of months, we had a lot of people in and out of the group, some because they didnt fit our style but others because of the whispers that they were undercovers, recalled Waithe. Whether it was real or perceived, that was the most debilitating part for me, the whispers Its really hard to organize when you cant trust each other.

Read this article:
NYPD officers accessed Black Lives Matter activists' texts, documents show - The Guardian

White People Banned From Philly BLM’s Next Meeting | The Daily … – Daily Caller

5569708

Black Lives Matter Philly banned white people from an upcoming event, claiming it is a black only space.

The April 15 meeting plans to discuss projects and initiatives for the upcoming year and act as a place for people to meet, strategize and organize. While children are invited to attend, white people are explicitly banned from the meeting, according to the Facebook event page.

When people began questioning the ban on whites over Twitter, Black Lives Matter Philly stayed by their ban, explaining that their meetings are black centered.

Anyone who identifies as African disapora is allowed to attend, the group explained over Twitter.

If you identify as a person of the African Diaspora You can attend our meetings and become a member. If not you can support us in other ways, Philly BLM said in a tweet. African Disapora usually refers to people who were taken out of Africa during theTransatlantic Slave Trades.

One Twitter user pointed out that Civil Rights leader Martin Luther King, Jr. worked side by side with whites to accomplish his goals. Philly Black Lives Matter responded by saying that was Kings decision.

The group also referred to Malcolm X, saying he too had banned whites from his meetings on race.

Follow Amber on Twitter

Send tips to [emailprotected].

Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact [emailprotected].

Here is the original post:
White People Banned From Philly BLM's Next Meeting | The Daily ... - Daily Caller

Fight for 15 and Black Lives Matter Join Forces on Anniversary of … – The American Prospect

(Mike Brown/The Commercial Appeal via AP)

Christopher Smith, right, leads chants during a protest for higher wages for fast food workers outside a McDonald's in Memphis, Tenn., Thursday, April 14, 2016.

On the April 4, 1968, Reverend Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. was gunned down on the balcony of the Lorraine Motel in Memphis, Tennessee, where he had come to support the citys striking sanitation workers, virtually all of them African American. The workers were embroiled in a heated labor dispute with the city government over low wages, dangerous working conditions, and its unyielding opposition to recognizing their union.

Forty-nine years later, much has changed, yet much more has stayed the same. Despite landmark advancements in civil rights, black Americans still face staggering levels of systemic social and economic inequities and rampant state-sanctioned violence and discrimination. Black men are three times more likely to be killed by police than white men, and are incarcerated at a rate five times higher than white men. Meanwhile, black men make 22 percent less in wages compared with white men who live in the same areas, with the same levels of education and work experience. Black women make 11.6 percent less than their white counterparts. On average, white households hold 16 times the wealth of black households. Today, 54 percent of African American workers make less than $15 an hour.

And 49 years later, black activists are still leading large-scale movements to address these injustices. On the anniversary of Kings assassination, Fight for 15 workers and Black Lives Matter activistsmany already involved in both movementsare joining together for a series of protests across the country to elevate their intersecting demands for racial justice and economic justice. The actions today not only seek to emphasize and build upon African Americans inextricable and intertwined struggle for both civil rights and economic justice of the 1960s, but create a broader front of intersectional progressive power to face off against the Trump administrations attempt to roll back both.

Activists in 24 cities will be mounting demonstrations and teach-ins under the banner of Fight Racism, Raise Pay. They plan to call attention to the systematic targeting of communities of colorranging from abusive local police departments that harass people of color, to Republicans in the states advancing anti-protest legislation in response to Black Lives Matter and Fight for 15 while at the same time stifling local minimum-wage hikes through state legislation. Activists will also call out the Trump administration for advancing an anti-worker agenda, supporting voter suppression, and threatening immigrant communities.

Our two movements have a common bond in fighting the racism that keeps down people of color everywhere, saidLatierika Blair, a 23-year-old McDonalds worker in Memphis, in a statement.

The actions center on Memphis, Tennessee, where thousands of workers, activists, and civil rights leaders will march to and hold a memorial outside the Lorraine Motel. In the mid-South city, Fight for 15 activists have encountered aggressive resistance as fast-food workers organized for higher wages and union rights. As The Guardian reported, organizers alleged in an a lawsuit filed in March that, with the authorization from the president of McDonalds, the Memphis police department was authorized to arrest McDonalds employees and engaged in a widespread and illegal campaign of surveillance and intimidation. Last November, the suit states, police officers allegedly followed organizers home after meetings, banned activists from entering city hall, and in one instance even stepped behind a McDonalds counter to stop workers from signing a petition demanding better working conditions. Based on these and other allegations, the lawsuit argues that the police department was acting in concert with McDonalds.

White supremacy and corporate greed have always been linked in America, saidChelsea Fuller, an organizer with the Movement for Black Lives, in a statement. The fast-food workers who are going on strike for $15 an hour and the right to a union are resisting the same institutional racism and oppression that fuels police violence across the country. We are stronger when we stand together, and so our movements are going to keep fighting back against the twin evils of racial and economic inequality that continue to hold back black and brown people.

Less than 250 miles southeast, in Alabama, the state legislature, dominated by white lawmakers, passed a law prohibiting localities from instituting their own minimum-wage laws after the city council in majority-black Birmingham had passed legislation in 2015 to phase in a $10.10 hourly minimum wage. The NAACP promptly responded with a lawsuit claiming that the GOP super-majorities in the statehouse and the Republican governor rammed through the legislation in 16 days in order to block Birminghams ordinancewhich would have largely benefited black low-wage workersfrom going into effect, a move that the lawsuit claims was tainted with racial animus and undermines the power of the citys black electorate. A judge has since thrown out the case.

Republican state legislators in recent years have responded to the Fight for 15 by racing to prohibit cities and counties from increasing their own minimum wages higher than state lawa policy that is now the law of the land in 34 states. These laws have an unmistakable impact on the lives of the black workers who are trying to get by on the minimum wage in cities like Detroit, Saint Louis, and Atlanta, located in states where Republicans dominate the state government and have passed laws forbidding local minimum wages.

WHILE KING'S LEGACY CENTERSmost prominently on his fight for landmark civil rights laws, he was a strong ally for the labor movement, frequently speaking at union conferences and rallies, and saw the need to combine forces early on. The two most dynamic and cohesive liberal forces in the country are the labor movement and the Civil Rights movement, he pronounced at the Illinois AFL-CIO convention in 1965. Our combined strength is potentially enormous.

King and other civil rights leaders relied on funding and organizers from the more racially inclusive and progressive labor unions of the time like the United Auto Workers, United Packinghouse Workers, and the predominately African American Brotherhood of Sleeping Car Porters, which was led by labor visionary A. Phillip Randolph. It was Randolph who organized the March on Washington (where King made his I Have a Dream speech) in 1963 that not only included civil rights demands but also called on Congress to increase the minimum wage of $1.25 (more than $9 in todays dollars) to $2.00 an hour (about $15.50 today) and to create a federal jobs guarantee for unemployed Americans looking for work. Randolph and march organizer Bayard Rustin were longtime avowed democratic socialists; King was, too, but seldom broadcast this for fear it would create one more hurdle that the civil rights movement would have to surmount.

Dr. Martin Luther King giving his "I Have a Dream"speech during the March on Washingtonin Washington, D.C., on 28 August 1963.

In the context of the early 1960s, this is a very substantial left-labor set of demands, says Eric Arnesen, a labor history professor at the George Washington University who has written extensively about the traditions of black trade unionism and labor activism. While they failed to achieve those demands, civil rights leaders did succeed in creating a fair employment guarantee through Title XII of the Civil Rights Act, which established the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. That is the result of the civil rights coalitions insistence that an economic aspect become embedded [in the legislation], Arnesen says. Its not the minimum wage increase or the federal jobs program, but it was certainly a substantial improvement.

Reverend Dr. William Barber II, a leading progressive Christian pastor who will march to Lorraine Motel, says that the prevailing narrative that King was slow to embrace an intersectional analysis of racial and economic justice is wrong. Barber points out that as early as 1956, in Kings Pauls Letter to American Christians address, he challenged the unchecked greed of American capitalism and never stopped employing critiques of the systemic violence perpetrated by capitalism, and the governments failure to address those problems. He did not see that as socialism, but rather as lining up with the tenets of his faith as a Christian, says Barber, who helms the Repairers of the Breach, a organization that seeks to build a progressive counterweight to the religious right.

Barber sees this current coalition of black (and other communities of color) and labor activists as the vehicle for continuing Dr. Kings work. We need to not only remember what he did, but imitate it, he says. He believes the confluence of the Fight for 15 and Black Lives Matter can play a central role in todays social justice movement, similar to that played by the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee (SNCC) in the1960s. These are the front line troops of transformation in this country right now, Barber says. Were going to see some powerful things coming from them moving forward.

ORGANIZERS HAVE BEENworking to merge the work of the Fight for 15 and the Movement for Black Lives for some time now. The Fight for 15 held its first-ever convention in Richmond, Virginia, this past summer, culminating in a march and rally in front of a towering statue of Confederate General Robert E. Lee. The strategy is a natural extension made by the leaders of the movement. It isnt a sort of institutional decision, Mary Kay Henry, president of the Service Employees International Union, the primary funder of the Fight for 15, told me in an interview in August. The Movement for Black Lives, meanwhile, has crafted an all-encompassing policy platform that includes calls for sweeping federal and state jobs programs, the uninhibited right to unionization, and protections for workers in the margins of the economy.

In Chicago on Tuesday, activists are holding a series of teach-ins about the intersection of labor and Kings legacy, which they hope will help build support for a general strike on May Day. Richard Wallace, deputy director of the Chicago-based Workers Center for Racial Justice, which helped write the Movement for Black Lives economic justice platform, says that a more concerted focus on racial justice and economic justice issues may help people expand what they understand labor organizing to mean. He says most people wouldnt see his groups work getting ban-the-box legislation (which prohibits employers from requiring disclosure of criminal records on job applications) passed in Illinois as a traditional labor issue. The main challenge in the city for African Americans is fighting for access to economy, Wallace says. Its hard to do the labor organizing if theres no black folks there. Our job is to remove the barriers to employment.

The Fight for 15 and Black Lives Matter have in recent years emerged as two of the most powerful and promising progressive campaignswith the former sparking an estimated $62 billion in raises for the countrys low-wage workers and the latter renewing nationwide scrutiny of American policing practices and the systemic shortcomings of the justice system, resulting in a slew of local reforms. Of course, neither has fully accomplished its ultimate mission. A higher minimum wage for millions of workers remains unattainable due to the GOPs opposition and its assault on local control, while SEIUs goal of unionizing fast-food and other low-wage sectors remains shrouded in uncertainty. Similarly, Black Lives Matter still struggles to win wide-scale criminal justice reforms or radical changes to policing.

Nonetheless, the convergence of these two movements could very well generate a level of strength and effectiveness they could not achieve separately, that can serve as a fulcrum for future civil rights and economic advancesand a bulwark against Trumpism.

View post:
Fight for 15 and Black Lives Matter Join Forces on Anniversary of ... - The American Prospect

The Strange Black Lives Matter Partnership With Fight For $15 – Investor’s Business Daily

Fight for $15 is attempting to regain its momentum for raising the minimum wage with another round of protests. (ZUMAPRESS.com/Newscom)

Following recent minimum-wage setbacks inBaltimore,Flagstaff, Ariz., andMiami Beach, the Fight for $15 is attempting today to regain its momentum for raising the minimum wage with another round of coordinated protestsin major cities nationwide.

This marks at least the twelfth coordinated Fight for $15 protest paid for by the Service Employees International Union since 2012. To keep the protest fresh for the media and ensure its quota of sympathetic news stories, the Fight for $15 has partnered with the activist group Black Lives Matter.

"What we both realize is we're stronger when we operate together,"says Fight for $15 organizing director Kendell Fells.

It's a strange association for many reasons. For unions, which have spentupward of $100 millionon the Fight for $15 in recent years, they risk alienating some of their more centrist supporters by partnering with a group built on the misconceptionthat there is an epidemic of racially motivated police shootings.

But the association is even weirder for Black Lives Matter, given the role of minimum-wage increases in creating additional barriers to black employment.

A recentreview of minimum-wage research by economists at the San Francisco Federal Reserve concludes, "A higher minimum wage results in some job loss for the least-skilled workers with possibly larger adverse effects than earlier research suggested." Because they often face failing public schools and divided families, black job-seekers are often less skilled than their counterparts and are disproportionately impacted by such entry-level wage increases.

According to areport last year by the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, roughly one in three black men aged 18 to 34 is either jobless or incarcerated. Among those without a high school education, that figure approaches two in three. The CBO cites the numerous recent minimum-wage increases at the state and local level as a cause of this employment carnage.

Ironically, unemployment among black youth is worst in the cities where Fight for $15 and Black Lives Matter are protesting today. In Philadelphia, the current rate of black teen unemployment is 27%. In Baltimore, it's 35%. In New York City and Los Angeles County, it's 33%. In metro Atlanta, where I grew up, it's 38%. And in Washington, D.C., it's 39%. In black neighborhoods in these cities the unemployment rate regularly exceeds 50%.

Now is not the time to increase barriers to employment for black youth by dramatically increasing the minimum wage. Black youngsters need a job more than a raise.

Why aren't these staggering black unemployment statistics common knowledge? Because for minimum-wage or black activists to acknowledge them would mean admitting that the minimum wage has nothing to do with the problems facing the black community. In fact, to the extent that the minimum wage keeps black people out of the workforce, it exacerbates their problems.

Such an admission would mean having to tackle issues facing black communities today that are not politically correct. These include divided families, broken public schools, gang violence and a lack of entrepreneurial opportunity.

Rather than supporting counterproductive increases to the wage floor, activists should fight to raise the wage ceiling for average job-seekers. In other words, fight for $50,000-a-year careers, not $15-an-hour mandates. Fight for victors, not victims.

This is not a far-fetched goal. Roughly half of the current5.6 millionunfilled jobs nationally pay this amount or more. These includehundreds of thousands of jobsin fields like sales, maintenance and trades.

But before job-seekers can get these good jobs, they first need jobs in which they can gain a toehold on the bottom rung of the career ladder and learn soft skills like customer-service, communication, and camaraderie to quickly move up it. For black youths, who often don't get this training at home or in the classroom, this is especially important.

As Federal Reserve Chair Janet Yellen highlighted inher speechto the National Community Reinvestment Coalition last week, the research connection between entry-level jobs and career prospects is robust. To win the fight for $50,000, these jobs must be protected.

The black community has many issues to protest about today. The minimum wage is not one of them.

Read more from the original source:
The Strange Black Lives Matter Partnership With Fight For $15 - Investor's Business Daily