Archive for the ‘Black Lives Matter’ Category

Black Lives Matter Suggests NRA Campaign for Truth Incites …

According to the Washington Times, LA-based BLM activists released a video saying:

Were talking about our lives here. When theNRAissues a public call to their constituents inciting violence against people who are constitutionally fighting for their lives, we dont take that lightly. We know that we are not safe, but we are not scared, either. We will continue to produce media, teach students, march and protest to not only protect the First Amendment as fiercely as theNRAprotects the Second [Amendment], but to protect our lives from gun-toting racists.

The videos narrator uses the language of us vs. them to mimic the NRAs description of the left as them and the NRAs explanation of how the left uses their media to assassinate the truth. The narrator implies that President Trump is the oppositions president, elected as part of a law and order administration that allows themmeaning policeto shoot first, to make them ask questions to later, make them scream I thought he had a gun in his hand and I feared for my life and he matched the description of a suspect.'

This videoand the subsequent pledge to continue disrupting, demonstrating, and participating in the resistancemakes Black Lives Matter only the latest in a series of leftists and left-leaning groups to criticize the NRA for pointing out the violent propensities of the left.

On July 6 Breitbart News reported that the Los Angles Times suggested the NRAs campaign for truth was antisemitic. Prior to that, the Womens March described the NRAs campaign as a direct endorsement of violence against women and California Lt. Gov. Gavin Newsom suggested the NRAs campaign for truth was putting politicians lives in danger, including his own.

All of this because the NRA released videos highlighting the lefts propensity for violence in media and in action.

AWR Hawkins is the Second Amendment columnist for Breitbart News and host ofBullets with AWR Hawkins, a Breitbart News podcast. He is also the political analyst for Armed American Radio. Follow him on Twitter:@AWRHawkins. Reach him directly at awrhawkins@breitbart.com.

P.S. DO YOU WANT MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS ONE DELIVERED RIGHT TO YOUR INBOX?SIGN UP FOR THE DAILY BREITBART NEWSLETTER.

Follow this link:
Black Lives Matter Suggests NRA Campaign for Truth Incites ...

Black Lives Matter Four Years Later: Under Donald Trump … – Newsweek

Four years ago Thursday, the Black Lives Matter movement came into existence, shifting both how many Americans perceive social justice and the lexicon used to describe racial injustices.

"Four years ago, what is now known as the Black Lives Matter Global Network began to organize," the organization wroteon its website."It started out as a Black-centered political will and movement building project turned chapter-based, member-led organization whose mission is to build local power and to intervene when violence is inflicted on Black communities by the state and vigilantes. In the years since, weve committed to struggling together and to imagining and creating a world free of anti-Blackness, where every Black person has the social, economic, and political power to thrive."

The movement began after George Zimmerman,the man who killed 17-year-old Trayvon Martin, was acquittedin Florida. Since then, there have been countless killings of black Americans that the movement has addressed and put a spotlight on. In the wake of the deaths of Eric Garner in New York City, Michael Brown in Ferguson, Missouri, 12-year-old Tamir Rice in Cleveland, Walter Scott in South Carolina, Freddie Gray in Baltimore and many others, "Black Lives Matter" became a rallying cry and hashtag in the wake of police-involved deaths of African-Americans.

Daily Emails and Alerts - Get the best of Newsweek delivered to your inbox

The protestshaveput the movement in the crosshairs of some Americans, President Donald Trump included. After Trump won the election, the movement said in a statementto Mic, in part: "What is true todayand has been true since the seizure of this landis that when black people and women build power, white people become resentful. Last week, that resentment manifested itself in the election of a white supremacist to the highest office in American government.... Donald Trump has promised more death,disenfranchisementand deportations. We believe him."

The president has targeted the organization, especially protesters who have taken to the streets. The White Housewebsite went live after inauguration and promised to end the"anti-police atmosphere" while noting "our job is not to make life more comfortable for the rioter, the looter, or the violent disrupter." Slate wrote about this shift withthe headline "In One of His First Acts as President, Donald Trump Put Black Lives Matter on Notice."

In May, Trump delivered a speech that the conservative outlet The Washington Times noted took "aim at Black Lives Matter" and slammed"'hostility and violence'against police."

The Washington Post wrote in May that Black Lives Matter hada renewed sense of purpose under Trump, but had adopted a shift toward effecting policy as opposed to organizing protests. As Newsweek previously reported,hate crimes are rising across all marginalized groups in 2017, according to the Southern Poverty Law Center and Human Rights Campaign.

"What people are seeing is that there are less demonstrations," Alicia Garza, one of the three women who createdthe #BlackLivesMatter hashtag, told The Washington Post. "A lot of that is that people are channeling their energy into organizing locally, recognizing that in Trump's America, our communities are under direct attack."

Original post:
Black Lives Matter Four Years Later: Under Donald Trump ... - Newsweek

Dana Loesch Takes on Black Lives Matter and Women’s March Activists – Fox News Insider

Trump Defends Don Jr.-Russian Lawyer Meeting: 'Most People' Would Have Attended

Coulter: 'A Lot of Republicans Hate Trump Just as Much as MSNBC Does'

Krauthammer: Donald Jr. Story 'First Empirical Evidence' of Collusion

Dana Loesch has found herself the target of Black Lives Matter and women's groups for a recent NRA ad in which she called on people to resist the left's lies, propaganda and political violence.

Loesch was personally called out in a recent Black Lives Matter video that urges activists to "produce media, teach students, march and protest to not only protect the First Amendment as fiercely as the NRA protects the Second [Amendment], but to protect our lives from gun-toting racists."

Also, the organizers behind January's Women's March have planned a new protest at the NRA headquarters, scheduled to start tomorrow. It also was partially in response's to Loesch's ad.

Loesch said it's "incredibly ironic" that these groups claim to be inclusive and support free speech, when that actually couldn't be further from the truth.

Michelle Malkin: Putin Would Have Benefited More From Clinton Presidency

$8 Million?! Marine Injured in Afghan Attack Rips Trudeau for Payment to Terrorist

AP Stylebook Instructs Writers Not to Use Words Like 'Pro-Life,' 'Refugee' & 'Terrorist'

She said that Black Lives Matter was started with the noble goal of addressing discord between African Americans and law enforcement, but now they're fostering more division instead of solving it.

Loesch pointed out that they're requesting the NRA pull her ad, which violates her right to free speech.

She added that the Women's March is actually a "discriminatory organization," because they're only for some women, not all women.

She explained that they don't want pro-life women or women who want to be empowered to use the Second Amendment.

"Somehow leftism or progressivism has the patent on being a female, it has the patent on being gay or a lesbian, it has the patent on being black or being a Muslim," Loesch said. "And it doesn't. And that's what I find discriminatory."

Watch more above.

Varney on Russia Hysteria: 'Impeachment Is the New Swamp Game'

Gingrich: Media 'Rushes Past a Bank Robbery to Grab GOP for Jaywalking'

Bernie Sanders Predicts GOP Healthcare Bill Deadlier Than 9/11

Cant-spell?: Dem Sen Uses Misspelled Poster to Bash GOP on Health Care

Read this article:
Dana Loesch Takes on Black Lives Matter and Women's March Activists - Fox News Insider

Did War for the Planet of the Apes Come for DeRay Mckesson or Did Hotep Twitter Go Too Far? – The Root

The Planet of the Apes movie series has always been racially problematic. Starting with the originals in the late 1960s and 70s and extending to the reboots starting in 2011, the films have a sort of hackneyed white-liberal-pontificates-about-race element to them that is at times compelling and other times insulting.

Apes, even superintelligent apes, as a proxy for black Americas struggle for liberation (as opposed to robots or elephants or superhero mutants) is a little tone-deaf, given the sustained racist associations between blacks and monkeys. Either way, with War for the Planet of the Apes opening this weekend, the movie stepped into controversy by not just aping the struggle for black liberation but possibly straight appropriating it.

Did War for the Planet of the Apes model the Bad Ape character after Black Lives Matter activist DeRay Mckesson? It certainly looks like it, and given Hollywoods racist history, its not crazy that some people think so.

On Monday morning, Tariq Nasheed, the left foot of Hotep-Twitter Voltron, tweeted the following poster from the upcoming movie:

The image started making its way around Twitter and Facebook, accomplishing something that Hotep appearances on Roland Martins show, The Breakfast Club and even Dr. Boyce Watkins show couldnt accomplish: It brought Hotep Twitter and mainstream Black Twitter together. Although there were some doubters about the racist nature of the new movies imagery, like St. Louis City Alderman, and representative of the sunken-place district, Antonio French.

Most folks saw the image as being a bit too close to Mckessons Patagonia-vest-wearing-activist image to think it was a fashion coincidence in the movie.

By Monday night, Mckesson had stepped into the discussion, making it clear that he didnt feel flattered:

Which led defenders of the movie, including right-wing film directors, to justify the blue vest as an homage to the original 1968 film.

Which, of course, Black Twitter wasnt trying to hear. We arent falling for the banana in the tailpipe again, especially when there are real monkeys involved:

This story actually ended up on The View, with Whoopi Goldberg, brandishing her Ph.D. in whitesplaining from Caucasity University, slamming Mckesson for not knowing film historybut still conveniently neglecting to mention that Planet of the Apes movies have always been about race. All of this over a movie that, likely, nobody in these various conversations has actually seen yet.

Ive seen every Planet of the Apes movie, and I saw War for Planet of the Apes at a press screening, in a mostly black theater, in Atlanta, with a very black friend. I enjoyed it and didnt see anything negatively racial about it. And this is coming from a guy who thought Spider-Man: Homecoming was racist.

Nothing about the Bad Ape character, including his blue coat (its more of a coat than a vest in the movie), made me think of Mckesson, Campaign Zero or Black Lives Matter. None of the CGI monkeys screamed #ApeLivesMatter. Caesar didnt put out a #BringBackOurGorillas sign when the Human Army, led by the crazy Colonel (a phoned-in mad-military-guy performance by Woody Harrelson), captured some of the apes.

Prior to this controversy, my review was focused on how most of the series political messaging about the environment, animal rights and race was wrung out of War for Planet of the Apes. That being said, people mad about the movie arent wrong.

There are few items of clothing more inextricably linked to one person than DeRay Mckesson and his blue Patagonia vest. Michael Jackson and his sequined glove, Pharrell Williams and that Hat, maybe former President Barack Obamas khaki Easter Sunday deacon outfit. Mckessons blue vest has its own Twitter account, it went to the BET Awards and theres legitimate symbolism behind why McKesson wears it.

If you saw a Disney musical featuring a monkey wearing a sequined glove, youd think of Jackson, and youd be wondering who dressed that monkey and why it had its own pet monkey. The point is, Mckesson and the thousands of people who saw the image and thought of him are not crazy or conspiracy theorists; they reflect Mckessons incredible brand penetration.

More importantly: WE HAVE SEEN THIS BEFORE. American popular culture is full of examples of insulting characters made to look or sound black even when they are ostensibly something else: Jar Jar Binks from Star Wars, Skids and Mudflap from Transformers, Ben Carson. The list goes on and on. Between Mckessons brand, Hollywood racism and the fact that the entire Apes franchise is supposed to be an allegory for American race relations, many people reached the reasonable conclusion that War for the Planet of the Apes came for Mckesson.

If you choose to see the movie, youll probably come away with a different impression, however. War for the Planet of the Apes is basically a postapocalyptic action movie at this point, and a pretty entertaining one. The movie shows the frighteningly quick evolution of the apes as characters. In earlier films they could only make ape sounds; now they use sign language. Those who knew sign language now talk; and Caesar, the ape leader, is giving Obama-level oratory and is playing the dozens with human adversaries.

The movie works best when it weaves together great elements from the original movies and explains, through a slow-burning and disturbing mystery, how monkeys and human beings could switch places on the intellectual pyramid in just under 20 years. This movie isnt the racial catharsis of watching apes strike a Django-like blow against their human (i.e., white) oppressors. Humanity has already lost to the apes; it just spends two hours trying to accept it. Outside of the occasional 101 Dalmatians-Smurfs problem (in some scenes, there are thousands of apes in Caesars group; at other times, they could barely field a basketball team), its the best movie of the reboot series.

Anyone who chooses not to see War for the Planet of the Apes because he or she believes its a secret attempt by the Hollywood Illuminati to lure black folks into a sense of complacency has every right to skip this one. Anyone who doesnt see the movie because he or she believes that the producers of a movie about historic racial discrimination should have known better than to put a monkey in a blue coat or vest can skip it, too. (Its worth noting that Mckesson actually deleted his tweet critiquing the film poster.)

Heck, anyone who just cant stand the idea of being indirectly in agreement with Whoopi Goldberg on a racial issue can take a hard pass as well. But take it from someone who gives racial side eye to just about any science fiction film: I think War for the Planet of the Apes passes the smell test. However, given Hollywoods history, if you want to teach it a lesson to be more careful in the future, that makes perfect sense to me. Hollywood has made more than enough money off of putting black pain in a monkey suit.

Here is the original post:
Did War for the Planet of the Apes Come for DeRay Mckesson or Did Hotep Twitter Go Too Far? - The Root

Newark riots recall an era echoed by Black Lives Matter – Los Angeles Times

The rumor spread quickly: A man had been beaten to death by police. For blacks frustrated by high unemployment, inadequate schools, substandard housing yet another abuse by police was too much to bear, and they erupted.

There were no shouts that black lives mattered. This was Newark in 1967, long before deaths at the hands of police in cities like Baltimore and Ferguson, Mo., gave birth to another movement in another era.

For four days in July, Newark was the epicenter of black rage. The rioting left 26 dead, more than 700 injured and nearly 1,500 arrested, mostly black. In addition to the $10 million in property damage, the riots left economic and emotional scars on Brick City that, in many ways, have not yet healed.

Newark was a deadly entry in the long list of major urban areas that exploded over a five-year period, among them Watts in Los Angeles, Philadelphia, Boston and New York's Harlem. Days after Newark burned, Detroit followed. The disorders exposed for the first time to much of white America racial and economic disparities that went far beyond the familiar scenes of segregation in the South.

"A riot is at the bottom of the language of the unheard," the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. wrote in his last book, "Where Do We Go From Here: Chaos or Community?" in 1967. "The amazing thing about the ghetto is that so few Negroes have rioted."

The rioters spoke loudly, but were they heard? The echoes of 1967 in today's America would suggest they were not, and the lessons not learned linger for a new generation where racial tensions, indifference and inaction persist.

"People were thinking about who they were, and thinking that they deserved more as American citizens," said Komozi Woodard, who grew up in Newark and was 18 years old at the time of the riots. "It went from a situation that was unbearable, to the community feeling it was unacceptable."

As a 12-year-old black boy, Woodard was beaten by a street gang in his neighborhood. His mother called the police for help, and when they arrived, the officers beat her son too.

It was 1961, and Woodard had learned his first lesson about the relationship between police and his community.

"I believed in the system, and the system came out and beat me up," said Woodard, now 68 and a history professor at Sarah Lawrence College. "It was an everyday occurrence for police to just beat people up.

By 1967, as whites fled for the suburbs and were replaced with a wave of black and brown residents, Newark was New Jersey's largest city and the country's first majority-black city aside from Washington.

Most of Newark's power structure remained white. Only 11% of its police force was black; citizen complaints about treatment by police routinely went unanswered and the few black officers on the force had little opportunity for advancement or leadership.

By July 12, Newark's black residents had had enough.

John W. Smith, a black man, was driving his cab when he was pulled over by two white Newark police officers. Smith and the officers' version of events diverged, but Smith was badly beaten during his arrest.

Smith was taken to a police precinct directly across from Hayes Homes. Residents who saw him dragged inside assumed he'd been killed by the officers, and word spread quickly through the crowded housing project.

Though Smith was treated at a hospital and later released, a riot broke out that night, followed by looting. The unrest continued for three more nights. State police and National Guard troops were called in to quell the uprising.

Many of the scenes that unfolded in Newark have resembled the conflict of the last few years: Residents clashing with police wearing riot gear and driving armored vehicles down city streets, mass arrests, government officials calling for curfews and frustrated citizens burning neighborhood storefronts.

The 1967 riots prompted President Lyndon Johnson to launch an inquiry into the cause of the racial disorders. Among the findings of the Kerner Commission were that the country "is moving toward two societies, one black, one white separate and unequal." The report identified police practices as among the primary factors that led to the unrest in black communities.

"The abrasive relationship between the police and the minority communities has been a major and explosive source of grievance, tension and disorder," the report read. "The blame must be shared by the total society."

The commission recommendations to improve police-community relations included a review of police operations to eliminate abrasive practices, more police protection to inner-city residents, more hiring and promotion of black officers and a means for residents to file complaints against the police.

The conclusions reached in the 2015 Justice Department report on Ferguson sounded similar to the Kerner Commission's findings.

In 1970, Newark became the first Northeastern city to elect a black mayor. Its police force became more diverse, and more officers lived in the city they were charged with serving. Today, 38% of the Police Department is black and 40% is white. The city's overall population is much the same as in 1967: 52% black and 26% white.

In the wake of the riots, economic development was largely limited to the city's downtown, where whites worked. The poverty level for black residents is 33%, and Newark residents hold only 18% of all jobs in the city.

In 2016, the Police Department was put under federal consent decree after a Justice Department investigation found officers were making unlawful stops and arrests, using excessive force and retaliating against residents. Fifty years after the Newark riots, similar recommendations are still being made as part of the federal consent decrees reached between cities and police departments including Ferguson, Chicago, and New Orleans found to have discriminatory practices against minority residents.

"We are a long way from 1967, but we are even further away from where we need to be to prevent 1967 from happening again," said Newark Mayor Ras Baraka, whose father, poet and activist Amiri Baraka, was badly beaten during the riots. "There were a myriad of things that were suggested, and frankly they were ignored. People need to feel like the government and the police are there to protect them and not to prey on them."

Whack writes for the Associated Press.

Read the original post:
Newark riots recall an era echoed by Black Lives Matter - Los Angeles Times