Mediaboss Marketing

I generally dont have occasion to quote conservative media pundit Ann Coulter, but a comment she made following Janet Protasiewiczs double-digit win over Dan Kelly in the Wisconsin Supreme Court race caught my attention.

In a Twitter post, Coulter said, The demand for anti-abortion legislation just cost Republicans another crucial race. Pro-lifers: WE WON. Abortion is not a constitutional right. Please stop pushing strict limits on abortion, or there will be no Republicans left.

That might be typical Coulter hyperbole, but she is correct that Protasiewicz made abortion rights the centerpiece of her campaign. The Wisconsin high court is expected to hear a case shortly challenging the states 1849 law that makes it a felony to perform abortions, a law revived when Roe v. Wade was overturned, and her election gives progressives a 4-3 majority on the court.

Opposition to a near-total ban on abortion turned what had been projected to be a close race into a Protasiewicz landslide.

A recent Public Religion Research Institute poll of over 20,000 Americans in all 50 states found that 64% believe abortion should be legal in all or most cases.

Majorities of residents in 43 states and the District of Columbia believe abortion should be legal, including 57% of West Virginians.

And that poll seemed to undercount support for legal abortion. A national Gallup poll conducted at roughly the same time put the figure at 69%.

But as Coulter points out, instead of declaring victory with the Dobbs decision and with implementation of total or near-total abortion bans in 15 states, including West Virginia, anti-abortion zealots continue to push for bans in other states, as well as for a national abortion ban.

Indeed, days after Potasiewiczs blowout victory, Florida legislators defied the will of the majority by passing a six-week abortion ban, a bill quickly signed into law by Gov. Ron DeSantis.

Likewise, a Trump-appointed federal judge in Texas, Matthew Kacsmaryk, issued a preliminary injunction to suspend the FDAs approval of mifepristone, a commonly prescribed abortion drug that for the past 23 years, the FDA has consistently found to be safe and effective.

Kacsmaryks ruling, pending appeals and counter-decisions, not only has the potential to ban mifepristone in all 50 states, defying the will of a majority of Americans, but to set a precedent to make it possible to remove other FDA-approved drugs from the marketplace.

Likewise, polls consistently show a sizable majority of Americans want stricter gun safety measures, a demand that goes unheeded by Republicans.

As a result, the United States has exorbitantly high rates of gun violence, gun deaths and suicides by gun compared to other First World countries.

Its not uncommon for cable news coverage of memorial services for mass shooting victims to be interrupted by breaking news of another mass shooting, as occurred Monday.

Yet, Republicans consistently fail to address the crisis, beyond offering thoughts and prayers, with some insisting nothing can be done to curb the nations epidemic of gun violence.

When thousands of protestors descended on the Tennessee State Capitol demanding gun reform following the mass shooting at a Nashville grade school, the response of the Republican supermajority in the General Assembly was to attempt to expel three Democrats who joined in the protests after leadership failed to take up any gun safety measures.

That they ultimately voted to expel Reps. Justin Jones and Justin Pearson, but not fellow protestor Rep. Gloria Johnson, raised the specter of racism, giving the appearance of a majority white male House of Representatives opting to punish two uppity young Black men.

(When asked why she survived the expulsion vote when her colleagues did not, Johnson said, It might have to do with the color of our skin.)

Since 1900, the Tennessee General Assembly had expelled only two members one after being convicted of bribery, the other after detailed evidence surfaced of multiple instances of inappropriate sexual conduct.

By comparison, the Tennessee Threes expellable offense was violating rules of decorum by leading peaceful protestors up in the House galleries in chants calling for gun reform.

Something similar occurred in the West Virginia Senate chambers this spring, when Sen. Robert Karnes, R-Randolph, violated rules of decorum by disrupting a morning floor session by repeatedly yelling out demands for bills to be read in their entirety, and shouting calls to be recognized by Senate President Craig Blair, R-Berkeley.

Karnes outbursts were not in pursuit of the noble cause of attempting to quell the ongoing carnage of young people, but in an attempt to kill a bill placing restrictions on child marriage in the state.

While the West Virginia Constitution, like the Tennessee Constitution, provides for expulsion of legislators with a two-thirds vote of the body, Karnes received no disciplinary action for his outbursts, other than being removed from the Senate floor for the remainder of the day.

No expulsion from the Senate. No loss of committee assignments. Just a few hours off the Senate floor. Which would have also been an adequate punishment for the Tennessee Three.

Had Karnes been a Black progressive Democrat, he likely would have faced much more severe punishment for violating Senate rules.

There are many other parallels between the GOP supermajority legislatures in Tennessee and West Virginia.

As we saw the cavalier attitude of Tennessee legislative leaders in ignoring the will of the people, weve watched West Virginia legislative leaders ignore the will of the people again and again, formulating bills in secret, stifling public input, defying a Constitutional process designed to promote transparency and clarity, and limiting debate by members.

As in Tennessee, Republicans in the West Virginia Legislature turned Republican majorities into supermajorities through the use of extreme gerrymandering that diluted Democratic votes by dividing blue cities among multiple rural districts.

Political parties that consistently defy and ignore the will of a majority of voters cannot stay in power indefinitely.

Of course, the expulsions backfired on the legislative leadership in Tennessee, providing the Tennessee Three with a national forum to expose wrongdoing in the General Assembly, and with Jones and Pearson being quickly reappointed to their seats in the House.

(To that end, the process to fill legislative vacancies in Tennessee is far superior to the process in West Virginia, with the Boards of Commissioners in the representatives respective counties quickly voting to reappoint both.

Had the expulsions occurred in West Virginia, the legislators respective Democrat Executive Committees would have had to submit to the governor three nominees to fill each vacancy. Politics being what they are, it is unlikely the governor would reappoint the expelled legislators, at the risk of drawing the wrath of the legislative leaders that orchestrated their ouster.)

Along those lines, it was disheartening to see statewide elected officers, including Gov. Jim Justice, Attorney General Patrick Morrisey, Secretary of State Mac Warner and Treasurer Riley Moore, issue statements criticizing the indictment of Donald Trump, while all, as best I can determine, remained silent regarding back-to-back mass shootings in Nashville and Louisville, Kentucky.

Justice, in a particularly heartless and obscene gesture two days after Louisville, posted on Twitter a six-week-old article on his signing the campus open carry bill into law, stating, I strongly support the Second Amendment. I proudly signed the Campus Self-Defense Act, which will strengthen Second Amendment protections in West Virginia.

Well, at least he refrained from spitting on the graves of the shooting victims. (Although Im sure if the gun lobby told politicians that is what they must do to retain its support, they would get their saliva flowing.)

Justice called Trumps indictment (almost certainly the first of several) a witch hunt, a term popularized by Richard Nixon regarding the Watergate investigation an investigation that led to his resignation as president, and had he not been pardoned, would have resulted in his indictment and almost certainly, his conviction on charges stemming from the cover-up.

Im pretty sure all the officials decrying the indictment took oaths of office in which they swore to uphold the U.S. and West Virginia constitutions, and yet, without the benefit of a trial, without access to the evidence, are disparaging a judicial process that has served our country and state well for ages, on no grounds other than blatant partisan politics. A duly empaneled grand jury of 26 fellow citizens concluded there was sufficient evidence to indict Trump, and Trump will have every opportunity to present evidence, call witnesses, testify, and otherwise defend himself at his trial.

If the indictment (and the ones likely to follow) were excessive, an overreach, or politically motivated, that will come out during the trials. If it turns out that Trump operated like a mafia boss in the White House, that too will be revealed in court.

Letting the legal process take its course is the American way.

Finally, since my last column, I passed a milestone birthday immortalized in a song from the Beatles Sgt. Peppers Lonely Hearts Club Band album. I would have been eight years old the first time I heard the song, and it never occurred to me at the time that someday, it would apply to me.

See the rest here:
Statehouse Beat: Ignoring the will of the people not exclusive to WV ... - Charleston Gazette-Mail

A federal appeals court says honking isn't First Amendmentprotected activity. There's no constitutional right to honk your car horn, according to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit.

The case involves Susan Porter, who repeatedly honked her car horn while driving past protesters in California in 2017. A deputy with the San Diego County Sheriff's Office issued Porter a ticket, saying she had violated a state law against misuse of car horns.

Porter pushed back, filing a federal lawsuit in 2018. In it, she alleged that honking her horn in solidarity with the protesters was protected First Amendment activity and that the California law used to ticket herwhich prohibits using a car horn except "when reasonably necessary to insure safe operation" or when used "as a theft alarm system"was unconstitutional.

A U.S. district court ruled against Porter, and now the 9th Circuit has upheld that lower court's ruling. For "the horn to serve its intended purpose as a warning device, it must not be used indiscriminately," wrote Judge Michelle Friedland for the majority.

But 9th Circuit judge Marsha Berzon thinks her colleagues got it wrong. In her dissent, Berzon noted that California cops are taught to use discretion when enforcing the horn-honking law, which could lead to selective (and discriminatory) enforcement. And Berzon scoffed at the idea that Porter honking while driving past a protest would be confused for anything but political speech.

"A political protest is designed to be noticed," wrote Berzon. "Political honking was hardly a significant source of noise or distraction in that environment. There is no basis for supposing that anyone was confused or distracted by the honking. Instead, Porter's honking was understood as political expression by the protesters, who cheered in response."

"Berzon also blasted the lower court's reliance on expert testimony by California Highway Patrol Sgt. William Beck," notes Courthouse News:

Beck said that car horns can startle and distract drivers and, if they're used indiscriminately, can "dilute the potency of the horn as a warning device." Berzon said Beck's testimony and the examples he gave amounted to opinion, not scientific fact.

"In none of these examples did Beck report any actual danger created by the honk. And, in any case, those examples were based on Beck's personal experience, no different from anyone else's experience with horn honking and so unrelated to any 'scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge' or experience," Berzon wrote.

Plus, Berzon added, the point of a protest is to make noise to call attention to a cause or an issuemaking it a free speech issue.

First Amendment Coalition legal director David Loy told The Washington Post that the court's decision "punishes a very common and ordinary form of political expression that people engage in every day."

"I was shocked that [California] law prohibits a common and widespread means of political, social, and personal expression," Loy said in a February interview on his group's website. "The government should not be stifling a critical form of expression, especially when public-health restrictions can curtail other means of assembly and protest, as we've sometimes seen during the COVID-19 pandemic. The statute at issue, Cal. Vehicle Code 27001, allows horn use to give a warning but prohibits it to communicate any other message. As applied to expressive horn use, that is the essence of unconstitutional content-based discrimination."

California isn't alone in restricting expressive honking. Court rulings on these laws have been mixed, as Belmont law professor David L. Hudson, Jr. points out.

In a 1998 case, the Montana Supreme Court said protest-oriented honking "did not constitute a protest to government of government acts which would be entitled to protection under the First Amendment." A federal court in New York has also rejected the idea that horn honking is protected expressive conduct.

"However, at least one lower court has recognized a free expression challenge to a horn-honking law, albeit on state constitutional law grounds," Hudson notes. "The Oregon Court of Appeals, in City of Eugene v. Powlowski (Ore. App. 1992), ruled that a city law prohibiting horn honking for purposes other than a reasonable warning to another vehicle violated the free expression guarantee of Article 1, section 8 of the state constitution."

DeSantis does better than Trump in swing-state poll. A new poll from Public Opinion Strategies suggests Florida Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis is more popular among swing-state voters than is former President Donald Trump. The poll suggests that in Arizona and Florida, DeSantis (who has not announcedyetthat he is running for president) could beat President Joe Biden but Trump could not.

In a hypothetical 2024 presidential matchup, 48 percent of Arizona poll respondents preferred DeSantis to President Joe Biden, who was preferred by 42 percent. In Pennsylvania, the divide was 45 percent to 42 percent.

In a hypothetical contest with Trump, Biden was victoriousthough it was very close. In Arizona, 46 percent said they would vote for Biden and 42 percent said they would vote for Trump. In Pennsylvania, 45 percent said they would vote for Biden and 44 percent said they would vote for Trump.

A FiveThirtyEight analysis of Biden's approval ratings shows that the current president isn't much more popular than his predecessor. Biden's average approval rating is currently 43 percent, which is just one point above Trump's average approval rating in April 2019.

Most Americans say the abortion pill mifepristone should remain available. In a CBS/YouGov poll conducted April 1214, poll respondents were asked, "With regard to the abortion pill, would you like to see this medication continue to be available in states where abortions are legal or become unavailable, even in states where abortion is legal?" Sixty-seven percent said it should remain available in states with legal abortion, while just 33 percent said it should not.

At the same time, most respondents think the Biden administration should comply if a federal court tells the Food and Drug Administration to withdrawal its approval of mifepristone. But the divide was small: Fifty-two percent of those polled said the administration should "follow the ruling, and withdraw approval of the abortion pill," while 48 percent said it should "ignore the ruling."

Asked about the effect of a mifepristone ban on U.S. abortions, only 20 percent said it would be likely to "stop a lot of abortions." Around a third said it would not stop any abortions, while 47 percent said it would stop some.

The poll also asked whether states with abortion bans should "criminally punish women who travel to other states to have an abortion." The response was overwhelmingly negative, with 76 percent of respondents saying they should not.

How to watch today's rocket launch by SpaceX.

Why is the State Department taking months to review passport renewal applications?

"The Supreme Court on Friday dealt the administrative state another blow with a 90 decision holding that individuals and businesses harpooned by an independent agency don't have to suffer a torturous government adjudication to challenge its constitutionality in federal court," reports The Wall Street Journal.

Video shows New Mexico police knocking at the wrong door during a domestic disturbance call and then fatally shooting the man who answers the door.

DeSantis has signed a six-week abortion ban in Florida. Republican pundit Ann Coulter is critical:

See the original post:
No Constitutional Right To Honk Your Car Horn, Federal Court Says - Reason

Even staunch right-wingers are admitting that the results in Wisconsins Supreme Court election are a bad omen for Republicans electoral chances going forward.

Janet Protasiewicz shellacked conservative Dan Kelly by 10 percentage points Tuesday, claiming victory and a seat that swings Wisconsins high court from a conservative majority to a liberal one.

Kelly was a deeply flawed candidate, both because of his connections to former President Donald Trumps efforts to overturn the 2020 presidential election and his opposition to abortion rights.

The latter was a particularly salient issue in the Wisconsin race, with the states Supreme Court likely to rule on a host of abortion-related matters, including on the legality of a 19th-century abortion ban reauthorized last year by the states GOP-controlled Legislature.

After the drubbing Republicans took in the 2022 midterms, amid a backlash over the U.S. Supreme Courts rescission of federal abortion rights, one might think thered be more widespread recognition on the right that anti-abortion crusades are unpopular. Even the chair of the Republican National Committee, Ronna McDaniel, seemed to essentially admit this in a Fox News interview on Tuesday.

Setting aside McDaniels gross lies about Democrats true policy goals with abortion, her comments about the GOPs messaging issue showed pretty remarkable self-awareness. Which is evidently a sin in most conservative circles.

As the quote tweets and Twitter replies responding to the above clip indicate, many conservatives reacted angrily to McDaniels remarks. (Note: McDaniel has faced plenty of backlash from ultra-conservative Republicans who claim she and the RNC havent been rabid enough in advocating their far-right talking points.)

One such response came from conservative conspiracy theorist Kyle Becker, who had some mansplaining to do.

To hear him tell it, the real issue in Wisconsin was that McDaniel and the RNC didnt use scare tactics well enough to persuade people to vote for Kelly.

Even conservative commentator Ann Coulter sees the writing on the wall for Republicans electoral chances if the party keeps pursuing anti-abortion legislation.

The demand for anti-abortion legislation just cost Republicans another crucial race, she tweeted Tuesday.Pro-lifers: WE WON. Abortion is not a constitutional rightanymore! Please stop pushing strict limits on abortion, or there will be no Republicans left.

This tweet, like McDaniels, was met with scorn from many conservatives.

When Ann Coulter is advising you on how not to be completely detestable, youve probably gone too far.

Nonetheless, dont expect Republicans to reverse course on this culture war.

Ja'han Jones is The ReidOut Blog writer.

See the original post here:
Wisconsin's Supreme Court election is a bad omen for the GOP - MSNBC

Arise, you young Republicans! You have nothing to lose but your salt shakers!

That thought occurred to me last week when Donald Trump urged his supporters to descend on the Manhattan courthouse to protest, protest, protest his impending arrest on Tuesday on a charge of having paid hush money to a porn star.

That arrest hadnt happened by weeks end. Good thing for the Donald. Only about 50 pro-Trump protestors showed up outside the courthouse. The most prominent was a contingent from the New York Young Republican Club.

As it happens, I somehow got on the NYYRC mailing list and I receive invitations to all their events.

On April 17 is The Return of Margarita Monday. For a mere $15, the members can avail themselves of complimentary cocktails from south of the border.

It all sounds quite civilized. These are not the sort of people who storm barricades. Someone should tell The Donald hes in the wrong political party, even the wrong country.

In France, the people take to the streets to protest any policy they dont like. The other day the protestors set fire to a police station, which is their equivalent of winning a referendum. More than 150 police were injured.

This is all over a proposed rise in the retirement age from 62 to 64.

Its common for the French government to capitulate to such mobs.

Thats not so in America and particularly among Republicans.

The motto of conservatives is, We do not march, said Mike Carroll, the former Republican assemblyman from Morris who has perhaps the longest pedigree among New Jersey conservatives.

Liberals love to march. Its a social thing for them, he added. Thats how they interact.

A good example was the Womens March of 2017, he said. It was held the day after Trump was inaugurated. Trumps crowd barely filled up the lawn area directly in front of the Capitol. But the Womens March filled the city with protesters for as far as the eye could see.

As for conservatives, they do not resort to taking to the streets to get their will, Carroll said. I have never carried a sign, I dont know any conservative who has.

No, they dont. Trump attracted a lot of populists to the party who liked to turn out by the tens of thousands. But theyre not turning out to protest his prosecution.

Trump found that out last week when his call to arms failed to attract big crowds in New York. In Florida, there were a handful of pickup trucks with Trump banners parked on the causeway that leads to Mar-a-Lago. But it was a beautiful day, perfect for enjoying the view over Lake Worth toward Trumps compound.

Earlier in the week there was chatter among the MAGA crowd about erecting a patriot moat around Mar-a-Lago to keep the cops at bay. But by weeks end Trump was saying he actually wanted to be hauled off in handcuffs. Apparently he figures the visual would make a great fund-raising tool.

I suspect hes about to find out. Late last week he put up a post showing him aiming a baseball bat in the direction of a photo of prosecutor Alvin Bragg. (Trump later deleted the post.)

Legal experts cited several statutes making it a crime to threaten a prosecutor. For good measure, Trump predicted death and destruction if hes arrested.

Heres my prediction: There wont be any death or destruction in Manhattan. Thats a liberal haven and last week the anti-Trumpers outnumbered the pro-Trumpers.

And in Manhattan, even the Republicans are not Trumps brand of Republican. A good example is Ann Coulter, a purebred WASP who grew up in Connecticut before moving to the Upper East Side.

Coulter was a big pro-Trumper when he first emerged on the scene. But after his botched leadership in the midterm elections of 2018, Manhattanite Coulter turned on the rube from Queens, calling him, a complete moron and a blithering idiot among other choice insults. (The New York Post turned on him as well.)

Trump proved her correct last week. He began the week accused of a crime that arguably should have been a misdemeanor. But instead of making that argument in court, he seems to have committed a felony by weeks end.

Trump still seems to be working on the theory that this and the three other prosecutions he faces will cause Republicans to make the streets run with rivers of blood.

In Manhattan, Republicans are more likely to encounter rivers of tequila.

Dont forget the shakers of salt.

BELOW - ITS THE DEMOCRATS WHO LOVE MARCHES AND PROTESTS:

I shot this video at the Womens March in Washington the day after Trumps inauguration in 2017. The crowd was said to have reached a million but there were so many people that they couldnt even march. It might have made them feel good, but it didnt reverse Hillary Clintons loss to the Donald.

More: Recent Paul Mulshine columns.

Paul Mulshine may be reached at pmulshine@starledger.com.

Follow him on Twitter @Mulshine. Find NJ.com Opinion on Facebook and on Twitter

Continue reading here:
What if they gave a riot and nobody came? Conservatives arent marching to Trumps tune | Mulshine - NJ.com

Country

United States of AmericaUS Virgin IslandsUnited States Minor Outlying IslandsCanadaMexico, United Mexican StatesBahamas, Commonwealth of theCuba, Republic ofDominican RepublicHaiti, Republic ofJamaicaAfghanistanAlbania, People's Socialist Republic ofAlgeria, People's Democratic Republic ofAmerican SamoaAndorra, Principality ofAngola, Republic ofAnguillaAntarctica (the territory South of 60 deg S)Antigua and BarbudaArgentina, Argentine RepublicArmeniaArubaAustralia, Commonwealth ofAustria, Republic ofAzerbaijan, Republic ofBahrain, Kingdom ofBangladesh, People's Republic ofBarbadosBelarusBelgium, Kingdom ofBelizeBenin, People's Republic ofBermudaBhutan, Kingdom ofBolivia, Republic ofBosnia and HerzegovinaBotswana, Republic ofBouvet Island (Bouvetoya)Brazil, Federative Republic ofBritish Indian Ocean Territory (Chagos Archipelago)British Virgin IslandsBrunei DarussalamBulgaria, People's Republic ofBurkina FasoBurundi, Republic ofCambodia, Kingdom ofCameroon, United Republic ofCape Verde, Republic ofCayman IslandsCentral African RepublicChad, Republic ofChile, Republic ofChina, People's Republic ofChristmas IslandCocos (Keeling) IslandsColombia, Republic ofComoros, Union of theCongo, Democratic Republic ofCongo, People's Republic ofCook IslandsCosta Rica, Republic ofCote D'Ivoire, Ivory Coast, Republic of theCyprus, Republic ofCzech RepublicDenmark, Kingdom ofDjibouti, Republic ofDominica, Commonwealth ofEcuador, Republic ofEgypt, Arab Republic ofEl Salvador, Republic ofEquatorial Guinea, Republic ofEritreaEstoniaEthiopiaFaeroe IslandsFalkland Islands (Malvinas)Fiji, Republic of the Fiji IslandsFinland, Republic ofFrance, French RepublicFrench GuianaFrench PolynesiaFrench Southern TerritoriesGabon, Gabonese RepublicGambia, Republic of theGeorgiaGermanyGhana, Republic ofGibraltarGreece, Hellenic RepublicGreenlandGrenadaGuadaloupeGuamGuatemala, Republic ofGuinea, RevolutionaryPeople's Rep'c ofGuinea-Bissau, Republic ofGuyana, Republic ofHeard and McDonald IslandsHoly See (Vatican City State)Honduras, Republic ofHong Kong, Special Administrative Region of ChinaHrvatska (Croatia)Hungary, Hungarian People's RepublicIceland, Republic ofIndia, Republic ofIndonesia, Republic ofIran, Islamic Republic ofIraq, Republic ofIrelandIsrael, State ofItaly, Italian RepublicJapanJordan, Hashemite Kingdom ofKazakhstan, Republic ofKenya, Republic ofKiribati, Republic ofKorea, Democratic People's Republic ofKorea, Republic ofKuwait, State ofKyrgyz RepublicLao People's Democratic RepublicLatviaLebanon, Lebanese RepublicLesotho, Kingdom ofLiberia, Republic ofLibyan Arab JamahiriyaLiechtenstein, Principality ofLithuaniaLuxembourg, Grand Duchy ofMacao, Special Administrative Region of ChinaMacedonia, the former Yugoslav Republic ofMadagascar, Republic ofMalawi, Republic ofMalaysiaMaldives, Republic ofMali, Republic ofMalta, Republic ofMarshall IslandsMartiniqueMauritania, Islamic Republic ofMauritiusMayotteMicronesia, Federated States ofMoldova, Republic ofMonaco, Principality ofMongolia, Mongolian People's RepublicMontserratMorocco, Kingdom ofMozambique, People's Republic ofMyanmarNamibiaNauru, Republic ofNepal, Kingdom ofNetherlands AntillesNetherlands, Kingdom of theNew CaledoniaNew ZealandNicaragua, Republic ofNiger, Republic of theNigeria, Federal Republic ofNiue, Republic ofNorfolk IslandNorthern Mariana IslandsNorway, Kingdom ofOman, Sultanate ofPakistan, Islamic Republic ofPalauPalestinian Territory, OccupiedPanama, Republic ofPapua New GuineaParaguay, Republic ofPeru, Republic ofPhilippines, Republic of thePitcairn IslandPoland, Polish People's RepublicPortugal, Portuguese RepublicPuerto RicoQatar, State ofReunionRomania, Socialist Republic ofRussian FederationRwanda, Rwandese RepublicSamoa, Independent State ofSan Marino, Republic ofSao Tome and Principe, Democratic Republic ofSaudi Arabia, Kingdom ofSenegal, Republic ofSerbia and MontenegroSeychelles, Republic ofSierra Leone, Republic ofSingapore, Republic ofSlovakia (Slovak Republic)SloveniaSolomon IslandsSomalia, Somali RepublicSouth Africa, Republic ofSouth Georgia and the South Sandwich IslandsSpain, Spanish StateSri Lanka, Democratic Socialist Republic ofSt. HelenaSt. Kitts and NevisSt. LuciaSt. Pierre and MiquelonSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudan, Democratic Republic of theSuriname, Republic ofSvalbard & Jan Mayen IslandsSwaziland, Kingdom ofSweden, Kingdom ofSwitzerland, Swiss ConfederationSyrian Arab RepublicTaiwan, Province of ChinaTajikistanTanzania, United Republic ofThailand, Kingdom ofTimor-Leste, Democratic Republic ofTogo, Togolese RepublicTokelau (Tokelau Islands)Tonga, Kingdom ofTrinidad and Tobago, Republic ofTunisia, Republic ofTurkey, Republic ofTurkmenistanTurks and Caicos IslandsTuvaluUganda, Republic ofUkraineUnited Arab EmiratesUnited Kingdom of Great Britain & N. IrelandUruguay, Eastern Republic ofUzbekistanVanuatuVenezuela, Bolivarian Republic ofViet Nam, Socialist Republic ofWallis and Futuna IslandsWestern SaharaYemenZambia, Republic ofZimbabwe

Read the original:
Ann Coulter: Heavy D don't tweet, he acts - Northwest Georgia News