Archive for the ‘Ann Coulter’ Category

Queen ‘C’

"Perhaps, someday, blacks will win the right to be treated like volitional human beings. But not yet."

Ann Coulter wrote that, not me. God no, not me. I would be ashamed to write such a thought. I would be ashamed to even think such a thought. To have that thought suddenly appear in my brain would terrify me. I would fear something had gone dreadfully wrong with my brain. I would worry some undetected fever was burning away my humanity, or some toxic virus was eating through the wiring that leads to logical conclusions, or maybe a tumor was growing inside my skull, putting pressure on the healthy parts, squeezing out all the things I have spent my life recording, seeing, experiencing.

Wiping away all those good, hopeful things that have accumulated in my brain and have led me to conclude there is more to human beings as a whole that is decent and loving, thoughtful and marvelous and inspiring, than there is vile and hateful, thoughtless and vicious and repugnant. So yeah, not only would I be ashamed to think that thought, I would be alarmed at what I was becoming.

Not so, apparently, with Coulter. In a recent opinion piece on how racism now exists only in the imaginations of confused white liberals and the scams of scheming black activists, she gave that statement a paragraph all to itself. Two short sentences, set apart from what came before and after. By structuring the piece as she did, we know Coulter was proud of the thought and pleased with the way she worded it. It's a writers' technique to emphasize the central point to which they have been building. Following is an example of me doing the same thing:

As to those two sentences, where you and I saw an unflushed clump of literary offal circling the toilet that is Ann Coulter's brain, Ann herself saw a bright gem she plucked out and held up for the world to marvel at.

Of course, that gem didn't appear suddenly in Coulter's brain. It had been there all along. It was forged in the fires of early tribal ignorance, stoked with the billows of irrational fear and held dear by uncounted clan chiefs, kings, empires and conservatives. For millennia, it has passed from cowardly father to cowardly son--or cowardly daughter, as the case may be--each subsequent generation too craven to acknowledge that what they hold to be a guiding principle is a goddamn lie.

It is arguably the oldest of lies, but unarguably, the most destructive. At one time or another, most tribes have enslaved, raped, slaughtered, visited any number of holocausts upon their neighbors, all with the moral justification that they were more complete human beings than those they tormented. That they were endowed with greater strength, greater culture, greater gods, greater beauty, greater brains and a greater will. That they had actually willed themselves into superiority over the others. The others, who by not having such a greater will--a greater volition--had shown themselves to be little more than animals, unworthy of the rights inherited by the superior breed.

Thus, with that statement, Coulter articulated what has been in the brains of conquerors, cowards and killers since forever. "They have no claim to equal consideration, because they aren't equal."

And about the door she left slightly open with "... not yet," that was her way of saying, "Should the day ever come when they think like me, when they accept as truth the lies I have never questioned, only then will they be worthy of my respect."

See more here:

Queen 'C'

Ann Coulter RIPS Chris Christie


Ann Coulter RIPS Chris Christie Rand Paul For Their #39;Little Bitch Fight #39;
Ann Coulter RIPS Chris Christie Rand Paul For Their #39;Little Bitch Fight #39; facebook.com/andrewbsheets.

By: leonida sheets

Here is the original post:

Ann Coulter RIPS Chris Christie

Ann Coulter: Chris Christie, Rand Paul feud is a “bitch fight” – Video


Ann Coulter: Chris Christie, Rand Paul feud is a "bitch fight"
8-1-13 Sign the petition to arrest Marxist radical Marco Rubio at mofopolitics.com.

By: mfprex

See the rest here:

Ann Coulter: Chris Christie, Rand Paul feud is a "bitch fight" - Video

Ann Coulter Rails Against Chris Christie & Rand Paul For Their ‘Little Bitch Fight’

According to Ann Coulter, the ongoing feud between Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) and Gov. Chris Christie (R-NJ) is nothing more than a little bitch fight designed to distract from a Christie-appointed senators vote in favor of amnesty for illegal immigrants.

Speaking with Sean Hannity on his radio show Thursday afternoon, Coulter was frank in her disdain of the high-profile battle between the two Republicans: The reason Chris Christie started this little bitch fight is to distract from the fact that he had his Senate nominee [Jeffrey Chiesa] vote for amnesty, she said.

Im just pointing out thats what the bitch fight is about, so dont fall for It, she warned, adding that Sen. Marco Rubio has acted similarly by talking up his anti-abortion stance in order to distract from his support of amnesty measures.

Sen. Paul and Gov. Christie have been in a war of words for nearly a week now, after the governor called the Kentucky senators strand of libertarianism to be dangerous thought. Since then, the pair have exchanged various insults on each others foreign policy beliefs and spending records.

Hannity chided Coulter for saying bitch fight on his air, but she pressed on: Whenever Chris Christie starts talking about this whatever, this snit with Rand Paul, this is just a distraction. Just ask him why he had his temporary Senate nominee vote to bring in 30 million more Democratic voters. Thanks, Chris Christie.

Listen below:

[h/t MofoPolitics]

>> Follow Andrew Kirell (@AndrewKirell) on Twitter

See the article here:

Ann Coulter Rails Against Chris Christie & Rand Paul For Their ‘Little Bitch Fight’

The More You Know: Rhode Island Law Says Voters Can Vote Without Photo ID

Many conservatives, such as Ann Coulter, like to point to Rhode Islands voter ID law as evidence that such laws do not have disparate racial impacts because Rhode Islands law was introduced and supported by Democratic legislators, and signed into law by formerly-Republican Governor Lincoln Chafee (I-RI). Aside from the silliness of the premise, that Democratic support for a single law refutes empirical proof of their impact and confessions as to their intent, Rhode Islands law differs from other voter ID laws significantly in that it doesnt actually require you to have photo ID to vote.

This isnt even some mystery-shrouded loophole embedded in a sea of legalese, its right there on the Rhode Island state website (emphasis mine):

This year, poll workers will ask you to show a current and valid ID when you vote at your polling place. Voter ID strengthens the publics faith in the integrity of our elections by enabling poll workers to match a voters face to the name they give at the polls.

I know what youre thinking, but no, that provisional ballot exception doesnt sunset when the rest of the law is phased in. Heres the statutory language:

17-19-24.3. Provisional Ballot Procedures. (a) At all elections, a person claiming to be a registered and eligible voter, but who has failed to provide proof of identity pursuant to section 17-19-24.2 shall be allowed to vote a provisional ballot upon executing a provisional ballot voters application. All provisional ballots, together with a provisional ballot voters application, shall be placed in an envelope in the form prescribed by the state board and deposited in a ballot box. (b) The local board shall examine each provisional ballot application to determine if the signature matches the signature on the voters registration. If the local board determines that the signatures match, the provisional ballot shall count. If the local board determines that the signatures do not match, the provisional ballot shall not count and the ballot shall remain in the envelope containing the provisional ballot application and the envelope shall be marked Rejected as Illegal.

In addition to not actually requiring photo ID, Rhode Islands voter ID law differs from other such laws in another critical respect, notes the Brennan Center:

In Rhode Island the photo ID bill that eventually became law was introduced by a Democratic legislator, passed two legislative chambers controlled by Democrats, and was signed by an independent governor.

Senate sponsor Harold Metts said, [I]n this day and age, very few adults lack one of the forms of identification that will be accepted, and the rare person who does can get a free voter ID card from the Secretary of State. While Im sensitive to the concerns raised, at this point I am more interested in doingthe right thing and stopping voter fraud.56 But Rhode Islands bill is significantly less restrictive and differs substantially from the others that passed this session, in two major respects. First, unlike the other states that provide a narrow list of acceptable photo IDs, Rhode Island broadly accepts any ID with a voters name and photograph.

Even given all of the ways that Rhode Islands law differs from the ones that, say, Chris Matthews was referring to when he said that Republicans pursue these laws to disenfranchise traditionally Democratic constituencies, theres also been recent legislative movement to claw back Rhode Islands law:

Rhode Island voters who have no photo IDs would be able to continue to show a government-issued ID when they go to the polls, according to a bill approved by the House Judiciary Committee Tuesday night.

Read the original post:

The More You Know: Rhode Island Law Says Voters Can Vote Without Photo ID