Archive for the ‘Alt-right’ Category

The ‘Alt-Right’: A new mask for white supremacy – Workers World


Workers World
The 'Alt-Right': A new mask for white supremacy
Workers World
Feb. 13 Alt-right has become a buzzword in the mainstream media to describe the extreme right-wing politics pushed by far-right bigots like Milo Yiannopoulos, Richard Spencer and Steve Bannon. What do the term and its mouthpieces really represent?
Violent protest and free speech: Antifa meets the alt right at UC BerkeleyRI Future
Alt-right extremist Yiannopoulos postpones book to include campus protestsAhram Online
'Dilbert' creator Scott Adams shouldn't fear speaking at UC Berkeley following Milo Yiannopoulos protestThe Mercury News
Kentucky Kernel -Newsworks.org
all 51 news articles »

See the article here:
The 'Alt-Right': A new mask for white supremacy - Workers World

OPINION The Alt-Right: Hood not included – The Daily Toreador (registration)

Lately, theres been a lot of news coverage about the far-left liberals. Since Donald Trump took office, weve seen the highly liberal left orchestrate demonstration after demonstration.

But, theres another side to the spectrum just as extreme as those liberals: the far right, also known as the alt-right.

I hadnt heard much about the alt-right until last year when I met a man who subscribes to those alt-right ideologies. I knew white nationalists existed, but I had never imagined sitting down with one and having a political conversation.

I had heard alt-righters had extreme views, but a part of me didnt want to believe there were people out there who really believed this stuff.

He was a friend of a friend, and I decided to sit down with him to hear what he believed. I imagined myself as a high-profile interviewer getting the scoop of the year. I could see the headline: An inside look into the mind of an alt-righter.

He started out talking about immigration. He was so forceful with his words. They sounded like venom in my ears.

He said United States is a white country, and its supposed to be for white people. I stared at him blankly, wondering what his rationale could be for that.

I remember him trying to explain so matter-of-factly that white people dont have their own country, and this used to be a white-person country.

I responded with the truth that when I think of white people, I think of Europe. What about Europe?

He argued Europe has even more of minorities than we do here. He continued with the point that he wasnt saying there cant be any of minorities here, but we need to make sure its below a certain percentage, so we can keep them in the minority.

I think my jaw dropped at this point in the conversation. I just couldnt believe someone who believed this stuff was sitting two feet away from me, that he was sitting in my own house.

Just as I thought it couldnt get worse, it did. He started talking about how he is attracted to people who look like him. I suppose he meant people who are white.

So, I told him to date someone who looks like him, then. His response was that if everyone is mixing, there wont be any pure white people left.

This is where it got really weird for me. He said something like, What if my kids want to be with someone who looks like them? To which I responded, White people arent going anywhere. Dont worry.

He rebutted with the suggestion that down the line, his concerns might prove valid.

Now, this is where I just couldnt wrap my head around what he was saying. I couldnt take it anymore. I was trying to sit quietly and hear him out without judgment, but I just couldnt listen any longer.

I told him I found it extremely weird that he was worried about the sexual preferences of his great-great-great-great-great-great-great-grandkids.

He looked at me in complete disbelief. He couldnt believe that I didnt see his side or understand his point. He had grown agitated at my reaction, and it seemed to boil over at this point.

He exclaimed in frustration that I must want my own people to go extinct.

I couldnt hold back a laugh. I told him I was already mixed. The conversation ended there.

Now, this is not to say that all conservatives, or even all alt-righters, align with the ideology of this one guy I had the misfortune of wasting an evening with. However, this does show me that these fractured mentalities are still lurking in the minds of, at least some, Americans.

I learned a lot that night. I saw a part of the world that I never expected to see. I heard racist, sexist and xenophobic rhetoric that I had only ever pictured in my mind as coming from beneath a white hood.

There were no hoods, signs or symbols indicating his extreme beliefs. And that was the scariest part about it.

Read the original:
OPINION The Alt-Right: Hood not included - The Daily Toreador (registration)

Two Alt-Right Subreddits Banned For Policy Violations – MediaFile

The popular discussion board Reddit is the internets very own hodge-podge with subreddits dedicated to everything from once-viral Vine videos to political movements. This past election cycle, Reddit has become a sort of virtual meeting grounds for the alt-right.

The alt-right is a white nationalist movement thats foundation can be traced back to a blog called The Alternative Right, written by movement leader Richard Spencer. More recently, Spencer and two cohorts, who share his white power beliefs, launched altright.com according to Slate.

On February 1 2017, Reddit banned the subreddits called r/altright and r/alternativeright for violating its rules on vigilantism. The site prohibits users from posting other peoples private or personal information on the forum. The Verge reported that the target of the exposure was the man who punched Spencer at an inauguration rally for President Trump.

Screenshot of r/altright after the ban.

The privacy clause is an attempt to protect users from being targeted in real life for the views they have expressed in the online forum. Like the criteria for defamation, there is an exception for the business contacts of public figures with this policy.

The site prides itself on being a space to share content that is funny, serious, offensive, or anywhere in between, but also a place of respect. There has been hot online debate about whether or not r/altright was a victim of censorship. In a statement to Gizmodo, a Reddit spokesperson revealed that the thread was frequent violator of the sites policy.

Voat, a reddit-like platform, is welcoming all of the subreddits refugees who found themselves floundering without an online community. The alt-right thread on Voat continues to make themselves a safe space for white supremacy and currently hosts 712 subscribers.

Screenshot of Voat v/altright thread.

In the spirit of conversation, a thread on Reddit has popped up where people can discuss the banning of r/altright. U/MortalSisyphus, former moderator of /r/altright, gave the following statement:

The admins are playing a losing game of whack-a-mole here. The internet is (at least currently) a free, open, anonymous, uncontrolled platform for individuals of every stripe and persuasion to speak their mind and grow as part of a community. The more the established political institutions try to maintain the status quo and marginalize us, the more they will drive free-thinking, independent lovers of truth to our side.

This is not the first time Reddit has been accused of manipulating content that it found discriminatory. CEO Steve Huffman altered defamatory comments posted about him on another alt-right subreddit r/the_donald, according to an article by The Daily Beast.

Here, we see another battle between content and content-neutral regulation. The Constitution was founded upon the ability for individuals to express beliefs and criticize the government. In the spirit of the document, the Supreme Court works to protect the political and social rights of citizens regarding free speech matters and beyond.

Reddit is able to ban these accounts because they violated one of the sites time, place, manner restrictions. This is a legal loophole that the site could have used to their political advantage, but have refrained from doing so. Founder Alexis Ohanian has publicly denounced the actions of President Trump, but other alt-right subreddits still exist on the site. This is a gesture that solidifies the sites commitment to freedom of speech.

See the original post here:
Two Alt-Right Subreddits Banned For Policy Violations - MediaFile

Violent protest and free speech: Antifa meets the alt right at UC Berkeley – RI Future


RI Future
Violent protest and free speech: Antifa meets the alt right at UC Berkeley
RI Future
antifa On February 1, 2017, Milo Yiannopoulos, alt-right speaker, provocateur, and Breitbart editor known for his conservative, misogynistic, and Islamophobic views was scheduled to speak at the UC Berkeley campus. Approximately 1,500 faculty and ...

and more »

See the original post:
Violent protest and free speech: Antifa meets the alt right at UC Berkeley - RI Future

The alt-right: America’s neo-Nazi movement – The Vermilion

Photo via dailywire.com

The alternative right, or alt-right, is a political movement in both the U.S. and Europe that has achieved increasing popularity with the presidential victory of Donald Trump, his adviser Steven Bannon and the recent debacle over Milo Yiannopolous though both the alt-right and Milo dont claim one another.

Its crucial to understand what the alt-right is, where it came from and what it intends on doing. Here Ill be laying out its philosophical basis, historical background and plans for the future. Though the alt-rights subreddit was taken down over policy issues, its base relocated to The Voat (similar to Reddit), from which Ill be getting a bulk of my information. Also, Richard Spencer, the alt-rights founder, publishes a journal called Radix along with other alt-right blogs.

The alt-rights main tenets are race realism and identitarianism. Race realism is the belief that human beings are divided into races and that those races are biologically unequal. The origins of race realism lie in the justification of Europes colonial dominance over the rest of the world from the late 15th century all the way until even the 20th century. As a means to justify the occupation and enslavement of native peoples, Europeans deemed them as savage and brutish races who couldnt govern themselves and needed to be colonized or enslaved.

Race science began on the premise that Europeans were biologically superior to Africans, Native Americans and Asiatic peoples. A common method of scientific racism is the measuring of human skulls. It was thought that European skulls were more apt for intelligence than the lesser races. Its important to note that Spencer, the alt-rights founder, has a picture from the book Crania Americana, the seminal text of skull measuring, as his Facebook cover photo.

Another aspect of race realism comes from the controversial book The Bell Curve, the premise of which is that intelligence is biological, IQ determines intelligence and that white people biologically have a higher IQ and therefore higher intelligence than other races. However, the major faults are the ideas that theres a set definition of intelligence (there isnt), intelligence is innate and unchanging (no evidence suggests this) and that there are races of human beings whose biology determines their IQ (flat out incorrect). Stephen Jay Goulds The Mismeasure of Man is known as the complete debunking of not only The Bell Curve, but the artificial connection between race and intelligence.

Identitarianism runs parallel to race realism in that it believes all men are NOT created equal and that identities (gender and race) create a natural hierarchy in society the most advanced, of course, being white men. The idea of hierarchy in society was espoused especially by the philosophy of fascism, in which an incredibly strict class structure is adhered to. The slave masters of antebellum had a similar paternalistic outlook in which slavery was seen as a positive good rather than a necessary evil. They believed they were following the laws of nature and keeping to a strict hierarchy in which slaves, wives and children were all deemed property of the male slave master. Identity being a key factor of a successful society white supremacy is explicitly adhered to.

Spencer made this perfectly clear in a speech he gave last November: America was, until this past generation, a white country designed for ourselves and our posterity It is our creation, it is our inheritance and it belongs to us.

Spencer and the rest of the alt-right believe America is culturally degenerating, that is, becoming socially weak. Compare this with Teddy Roosevelt, who believed America had to fight in wars to avoid the weakening of the American Race and its supposed break from masculinity.

Identitarianism and race realism, then, are inherent negatives on society and are based on false presuppositions of white and male superiority whose supposed supremacy came solely from the heinous and genocidal crimes of European colonial conquest on the rest of the planet.

The history of white supremacy can be traced not only through conquest, but the resistance of those fighting back. The Klu Klux Klan, for example, didnt appear until Reconstruction after the Civil War, in which black citizens, for the first time, held positions in government and had genuine political power for the first time in U.S. history. The Klan specifically targeted these officials. Also, going back to Teddys masculinity crisis, the Boy Scouts and many other male inclusive athletic organizations didnt arise until women began demanding rights such as suffrage, etc. In this sense, it is inherently reactionary, meaning it harshly pushed back on any social progress.

What does the alt-right intend on creating? According to Richard Spencer, it seeks to create an ethno-state, which he believes Donald Trump is helping become reality. An ethno-state, according to Richard Spencers own National Policy Institute, is the White mans only practical step forward. It is the belief that a country should be artificially created to preserve and uphold a specific race.

Spencer and the alt-right believe that the rise of a non-white population become the majority in America is a crisis that must be stopped via the creation and enforcing of an ethno-state, which inherently would involve ethnic cleansing. Ill let the alt-rights Colin Liddell speak for himself in his essay Is Black Genocide Right?

However, for too long now, when we consider questions of race, especially questions concerning the Black race, we have been framing things in completely the wrong way, Liddell wrote. Instead of asking how we can make reparations for slavery, colonialism, and Apartheid or how we can equalize academic scores and incomes, we should instead be asking questions like, Does human civilization actually need the Black race? Is Black genocide right? and, if it is, What would be the best and easiest way to dispose of them? This was published on the alt-rights official website.

The alternative right should not be deemed as such, but as what they are: Neo-Nazis. This movement in America is nothing new and has shown its face under different names throughout history, whether under a white sheet or otherwise. A dialogue should not be reached with the alt-right. They should be suppressed and stopped. Their views inherently entail the genocide of minorities, and, therefore, their existence is predicated on the threat of said genocide. Thus, the action that should be taken is not a dialogue, but an utter halt to their movement.

Image source: https://www.google.com/amp/www.theatlantic.com/amp/article/508379/

alt-right bell curve genocide race white people

See the original post here:
The alt-right: America's neo-Nazi movement - The Vermilion