Archive for the ‘Alt-right’ Category

Conservatives must oust ‘alt-right’ | Opinions | thepublicopinion.com – Watertown Public Opinion

I had never heard of Milo Yiannopoulos until recently, perhaps because I dont visit some of the websites where his musings are published.

Milo, as he calls himself because of the difficulty some have pronouncing his last name, was disinvited from this weeks Conservative Political Action Committee (CPAC) annual gathering of the right in Washington. Apparently the organizers were not bothered by Milos association with the so-called alt-right. CPAC withdrew the invitation only after a video surfaced showing him apparently endorsing man-boy relationships that qualify under the definition of pedophilia. Yiannopoulos has resigned as an editor at Breitbart.com and apologized for his remarks.

The editors of National Review, as well as other traditional conservative publications and individuals, criticized CPAC for inviting Yiannopoulos to speak. The conservatism of Russell Kirk, William F. Buckley Jr. and Ronald Reagan was about ideas, not emotion and exclusion. Reagan, whom the modern right likes to claim as one of its own, was an optimist. Even when he criticized the lefts policies, he almost always presented a superior alternative. He wanted to attract as many people to his worldview as possible by winning the argument and converting opponents, whom he always regarded as fellow Americans and friends, even when he disagreed with them.

Today, conservatism has become known in the eyes of many for what and who it is against, not what and who it is for. Yes, part of this is due to media stereotyping, but not all. Traditional conservatism has been a positive we can do better, an inspiring and uplifting philosophy that motivates rather than denigrates.

In his 1993 book The Politics of Prudence, Russell Kirk set down principles he believed should define conservatism. Among them were the following: an enduring moral order; an adherence to custom, convention and continuity guided by the principle of prudence; the principle of imperfectability, meaning we dont look to government to create perfect men and women, or a perfect society, thus rejecting utopianism; the belief that freedom and property are closely linked; conservatives uphold voluntary community and reject involuntary collectivism; the need for prudent restraints upon power and upon human passions; permanence and change must be recognized and reconciled in a vigorous society.

That last one bears elaboration, and Kirk offers it: The conservative knows that any healthy society is influenced by two forces, which Samuel Taylor Coleridge called its Permanence and its Progression. The Permanence of a society is formed by those enduring interests and convictions that give us stability and continuity; without that Permanence, the fountains of the great deep are broken up, society slipping into anarchy. The Progression in a society is that spirit and that body of talents which urge us on to prudent reform and improvement; without that Progression, a people stagnate.

One sees this in the debate over the Constitution between liberals, who believe it to be a living document, subject to constant change and updating, and conservatives, who believe it a rock of stability that serves as a guide even in the face of rapid technological and cultural change. Just as a GPS must have a starting point in order to arrive at an intended destination, so too must America have a source from which it can plot its direction and not get lost on the journey.

In 1962, William F. Buckley Jr. denounced the John Birch Society as far removed from common sense and urged the Republican Party to purge the movement from its ranks. So too must todays conservatives separate themselves from the alt-right white supremacists and anti-Semites and reclaim traditional conservatism as the authentic brand.

Conservatives can win elections and govern without beyond-the-fringe types like Milo Yiannopoulos. If they cant, they dont deserve to win.

Follow this link:
Conservatives must oust 'alt-right' | Opinions | thepublicopinion.com - Watertown Public Opinion

White House sees damage from ‘alt-right’ – Hamilton Spectator


The Atlantic
White House sees damage from 'alt-right'
Hamilton Spectator
President Donald Trump can no longer dodge and distract from the cold reality that his administration has granted a platform for white supremacists and anti-Semites to advance their twisted causes. His failure to lead has helped members of the "alt ...
At Las Vegas confab, Republican Jews gingerly find reasons to celebrate Trump's presidencyJewish Telegraphic Agency

all 42 news articles »

Read more:
White House sees damage from 'alt-right' - Hamilton Spectator

German Alt-Right Loves This Fake ‘Refugee Crime’ Map – Daily Beast

An anonymously-produced mapwith links to a pro-Trump and pro-Putin accountsays it shows the spread of refugee and migrant crime in Germany. Dont trust it.

By Crofton Black and Abigail Fielding-Smith, The Bureau of Investigative Journalism

Last year, an anonymously-produced map started to make its way around German social media. It claimed to show viewers the spread of refugee and migrant crime throughout Germany.

Unlike some of the lurid tales of migrant depravity that have circulated in Germany in recent months and turned out to be false, the interactive map seemed professionally put together. Each pin on it correlated to a police or media report of a crime (we dont document cases simply on the basis of hearsay, its makers claimed). The map, called XY-Einzelfall (a sarcastic riposte to the idea each migrant crime is simply an isolated caseEinzelfall in German) got more than four million views. One of the XY-Einzelfall (XYE) social media followers tweeted over 80 times as new crimes were added to the map: The times coming when Germans will need to carry guns for self-protection.

Systematically misleading

But analysis of the maps methodology by the Bureau of Investigative Journalism shows that it is systematically misleading, often attributing crimes to migrants or refugees on the basis of nothing more than a witness statement that the perpetrator was dark-skinned or southern. On top of this, the project vastly overstates the figures on migrant crime through skewed use of statistics.

Tracing XYEs presence on social media also shows it to be far from politically neutral. An account in XYEs name on the Russian social media site VKontakte is rife with the kind of pro-Trump pro-Putin memes which have become the signature of the global alt-right.These are also the dominant affiliations of the Twitter accounts promoting the map.

Facebook is supposed to be cracking down on fake news in Germany, amid fears that the kind of misinformation seen in the U.S. may play a role in this years federal elections. One sensational story about New Years Eve attacks by migrants in Frankfurt was published by the newspaper Bild and picked up by the Daily Express and Daily Telegraph before Bild apologized for publishing a fake story.

But unlike fabricated stories which can be easily fact-checked, the refugee crime maps main business is slick distortion of reality, which is much harder to track. In the more strictly policed media environment of Germany, fake news has apparently taken on more sophisticated forms.

These cases are more problematic than outright fake news, says Jonas Kaiser, an expert on German media at Harvard Universitys Berkman Klein Center. I think these cases are going to rise.

The XYE map first emerged following reports that migrant men had committed mass sexual assaults during Colognes New Years Eve celebrations. Opponents of Chancellor Angela Merkel were quick to link the assaults to her decision to accept the million-odd asylum seekers who came to Germany in 2015. The medias initial slowness in reporting the New Years Eve attacks fuelled suspicions of a conspiracy of silence around the issue.

The map gained momentum. By the end of the year you could hardly see Germany for the forest of pins.

XYE was brought to the mainstream medias attention by a blog in the Frankfurter Allegemeine Zeitung, and later cited in the British tabloid Daily Express (MERKELS SHAME: Map reveals shocking extent of migrant sex attacks on women and children).

It was also picked up by the Trump-affiliated news site Breitbart, which accused Facebook of stealthily interfering to stop the map showing up in users news feeds after they had liked it.

The map visualises 8800 separate incidents from 2016while asserting this is only a fraction of migrant/refugee crime cases in that year.

Thank You!

You are now subscribed to the Daily Digest and Cheat Sheet. We will not share your email with anyone for any reason

The crimes represented on the map are outlined in brief summaries and sourced to a mixture of police and media reports.

The maps makers have chosen not to be identified, citing fear of left-wing reprisals. But one of them gave an interview under a pseudonym to the far-right publication Junge Freiheit in April. She said XYE was run by four women and a man.

We dont read between the linesthere must be a clear reference to the perpetrators background in the source material, she said.

The Bureaus analysis however shows the maps portrait of a migrant crime epidemic rests on highly dubious assumptions about the perpetrators origins.

The maps creators like to portray their approach as scientific, mimicking the language of academics and think tanks. In January they released a seven-day analysis of published police reports, with a breakdown of crimes by groups of different origins and a headline suggesting that 84 percent of crimes were committed by migrants.

In fact, the 84 percent figure is completely misleading. The map-makers have stripped out all crimes in which the perpetrators background is not mentioned from their calculation. The true percentage of crimes in this period committed by migrantsaccording to XYEs own datais 13 percent. There is a further 13 percent of crimes which the XYE say are probably committed by migrants.

We looked at how XYE decided that each pin on the map represents a crime which could have been committed by migrants. They comb police and media reports and pull out descriptions of perpetrators. We found that almost two-thirds of their reported offenders fell into the categories of dark-skinned, southern-looking, foreigner, or refugee. We then selected a random sample of 100 reports within each of these four categories for closer analysis.

We found that in nearly all cases where the perpetrator was described as dark-skinned or southern, there was no evidence in the sources positively identifying them as a migrant or refugee. This was also true of the overwhelming majority of cases in which the offender was described as a foreigner.

Overcrowded asylum centers

In the summaries where the perpetrator is explicitly described as a refugee, there is usually evidence supporting this claim. But even these dont support the idea of a migrant crime wave against Germans. In more than a third of the hundred sample cases in this category that the Bureau analysed, the crimes consisted of fights or other incidents within Germanys overcrowded asylum centers.

One of the cases in this category was a disturbed 17-year-old Afghan boy who was considered at risk of suicide after he tried to throw himself out of a window.

Another involved a fire alarm going off in a refugee hostel due to someone smoking. There was no damage or injuries.

In at least one case represented on the map as a refugee crime, the asylum seeker was actually the victim of the attack, not the perpetrator.

Matt Ashby, a crime-mapping expert at Nottingham Trent University and former policeman, was critical of XYEs methodology.

For a start, Ashby explained, it would make more sense to base the data on people who had actually been charged with a crime, because eye-witnesses are notoriously unreliable.

Ive taken a huge number of statements from victims or witnessessometimes theyll get it wrong in terms of whether someone was black or white, he said. If its just based on a witness description you cant make any meaningful statement about who committed that crime.

His concerns were echoed by Dr. Theo Kindynis, a criminologist at the University of Roehampton, London, who has researched the history of crime mapping. Kindynis told the Bureau that there were some very basic, fundamental, epistemological and methodological issues with the map, citing for example its reliance on media reports.

Even if the data on which the map was based was accurate, it makes little sense without other data with which to contextualise it. For instance, what proportion of overall crimes do these account for? How do the crimes committed by refugees or migrants compare (proportionally) with those committed by native or citizen residents of a given area? Without that context, the data is useless at best.

While XYEs Twitter and Facebook postings refrain from overt political content, the account in XYEs name on the Russian social networking site VKontakte suggests where their sympathies lie.

VKontakte is not subject to the kind of content controls that Facebook has agreed to deploy in Germany, and XYEs page is populated with pro-Putin and pro-Trump memes, jokey riffs on the Third Reich, and depictions of Chancellor Angela Merkel as a gap-toothed black man or radical Muslim.

It is not clear whether XYE was set up by Merkels political opponents as a propaganda tool, or whether it reflects the work of motivated individual citizens. In the age of social media those distinctions are starting to blur.

Online supporters of U.S. President Donald Trump coordinated their efforts to push his agenda in the run-up to the election. These supporters are now increasingly interested in Germany. Trump himself has said that Merkels immigration policy was a disaster that caused German crime to rise to levels that no-one thought they would ever, ever see, and has asked his administration to start compiling a list of crimes by migrants in America.

Some of his supporters see a mirror of Trumps populist insurgency in the anti-immigrant party Alternative fr Deutschland (AfD), which is hoping to gain seats in the German parliamentary elections this fall. The internet forum Reddit, which Trump supporters used as a platform in the U.S. election, now has a Make Germany Great Again section in support of the AfD.

Twitter is far less influential in Germany than it is in the U.S., but there are signs of an online network coalescing around the AfDs anti-immigrant message and XYEs map.

The Bureau analyzed activity around XYEs Twitter account over 10 days in January 2017. Just 10 followers were responsible for more than a quarter of the accounts 15,000 retweets during this period.

Among those 10 accounts, only one name was more prominent in their tweets than their adversary Angela Merkel, and that was Donald Trump.

Some of their most popular hashtags over this 10-day period, aside from references to the AfD, were Trump, Fakenews? and MerkelMussWeg [Merkel Must Go].

The local branch of the AfD in the town of Dreieich in Hessen has a banner on its home page alerting people to the XYE map, as an example of what is being withheld from citizens.

Although the map has been circulated mainly within the right-wing world, it and others like it have the potential to play an important role in the migration debate in Germany.

Harvards Jonas Kaiser argues that such seemingly scientific material helps legitimise an anti-immigrant political position. Things like the XYE map tighten the right-wings identity, Kaiser says. Fake news may not have an impact on the German election, but unreliable maps could.

Read more:
German Alt-Right Loves This Fake 'Refugee Crime' Map - Daily Beast

What if the alt-right ran the Oscars? Things would be so much worse – Mirror.co.uk

If you haven't rolled your eyes yet today at the gnashing of teeth over who wore what daft dress, who said what daft thing and who sobbed on stage at the Oscars then please, take a moment.

The self-obsessed liberals who gather annually to celebrate their art by injecting botox into their armpits and practicing their 'I'm SO glad he won' faces are just kidding themselves they're making the world a better place for anyone other than their accountants and facial refurbishers.

Most of us choose not to care. But there are some people who care a little too much - the ultra-Conservative, Braxcist, Trump-twiddling minority who currently feel their new world order is nigh.

Toby Young has complained white, heterosexual males don't win enough pretty gold statues. Donald Trump actually REFUSED to tweet. Angry social media warriors just got angrier about snowflake celebrities daring to have political opinions.

But if these people were in charge of the Oscars, what would it be like? Would it be humble, would it be apolitical, would a straight white man finally catch a break?

Or would it be like this:

Video Unavailable

Click to play Tap to play

Play now

Watch this video again

Video will play in

"The number of hot birds in this blitz are freaking me nut out. I mean I love my wife with all me heart but if there's anyone wants to send me a picture of their norks I'd be well chuffed. Not you, Meryl. I mean you got a boat on yer but you're a bit of a boiler now. Emma Stone, she can. Anyway I'm not allowed to be political so I'd am contractually obliged to say, hail to the Trump, Gawd save the Queen and chim-chiminee, chim-chim-cheroo. WHAT SLAG PUT MY MY DMs UP ON THAT SCREEN?"

You know, Jimmy Kimmel and Danny have never been seen in the same room. Coincidence?

Oscars 2017 : Worst Dressed Celebs On The Red Carpet

Instead of the usual pushing and shoving to get their hands on the best frocks from the likes of Lagerfeld, Versace and Christian Dior, there would be a mandatory dress code of wearing dresses only from Ivanka Trump's failed department store line.

Which means everyone would look like they'd just got married in Vegas at 3am.

They're more alt-right than they realise - calling any criticism 'fake news', blaming everyone but themselves and changing their minds every five minutes while insisting they're winners. So of course Labour would be deputised to replace the Academy.

Seeing as John McDonnell changed his mind in under a week about blaming a new Labour coup that isn't happening for his party's disastrous loss in Copeland, he should be able to take a Best Picture switcheroo in his stride.

Video Unavailable

Click to play Tap to play

Play now

Watch this video again

Video will play in

That's because the real Nicole was replaced with a robot when she did Stepford Wives and no-one noticed, even though her face hasn't moved since.

The alt-right love a pale-skinned wife who can't frown so you'd probably find under their rule there'd be more than one Nicole in the audience.

On the plus side, Tom Cruise would explode.

Come on, he's got form. Remember the entirely accidental Reichstag fire?

Beautiful white heterosexuals dancing because everything that happened 50 years ago is so much better than today - you just KNOW it would sweep the board.

And anyone who suggested that a low-budget movie about a black, drug-addicted, single parent had really won the popular vote would be taken outside onto Sunset Boulevard and shot by the Meryl Streep Is So Overrated Memorial Firing Squad.

Video Unavailable

Click to play Tap to play

Play now

Watch this video again

Video will play in

In chains and an orange jumpsuit, probably.

Either that or Presidential hairdresser.

Just because someone with a camera stayed in a Syrian suburb being pulverised daily by barrel bombs and Our New Best Friend Vladimir Putin and filmed volunteers saving 82,000 lives while America completely failed to help doesn't mean they'd get an award and the chance to read a verse of the Koran on international television.

Because Muslim.

So Dapper Laughs would get it instead.

Which is all a perfectly good reason why, when you hear Viola Davis wafting on about "exhuming" stories in the only industry on Earth to show "what it is to live a life" - I mean, toilet attendants anyone? - or watch the wrong envelope be turned into an incident of global disproportions, you should be glad.

Yes, Hollywood is mostly soft-palmed saps who can't handle criticism or a proper job, but then so are most of us. If art is supposed to reflect its audience's hopes, dreams and nightmares then the Oscars does just that.

They can be irritating but the best thing they've got going for them - and that we have in our own favour as well - is that the other guys would be MUCH worse.

With them your eyes wouldn't just roll. They'd be gouged out and used for marbles, and you know it.

Continue reading here:
What if the alt-right ran the Oscars? Things would be so much worse - Mirror.co.uk

How the ‘alt-right’ came to haunt conservatism – Washington Examiner

OXON HILL, Md. The Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) is the nation's largest gathering of conservatives, but it sometimes seems to attract almost as many headlines for whom it kicks out.

This year, CPAC is hosting both the president and vice president of the United States during the first two days. But a lot of the coverage has focused on internet provocateur Milo Yiannopolous being disinvited and a prominent white nationalist being expelled.

The media attention attracted by both men is disproportionate. Donald Trump has, in many ways that matter to your average CPAC attendee, been a normal Republican president, social media habits aside. The conference is no more "alt-right" than it is alt-punk or alt-country.

Yet there is also a palpable anxiety among some conservatives that their movement is being repealed and replaced with something more sinister. Yiannopolous lost his speaking slot for other reasons, but he has gleefully danced right up to the lines Richard Spencer long ago crossed lines mainstream conservatives aged 40 and under especially thought had been inerasable since William F. Buckley Jr.'s purge of anti-Semites and other cranks.

Two factors much larger than Twitter trolls and anonymous 4Chan users are at play here. First, a look around any large conservative gathering reveals it is not very racially diverse. There's nothing wrong with that in theory, but in practice is not conducive to building racial sensitivity.

Even a movement as progressive as that which coalesced around socialist Bernie Sanders faced criticism for not being sufficiently inclusive. His African-American former press secretary reported encountering racism on the campaign trail, though not from fellow staffers. But Sanders' supporters, and some of the areas where he was most popular, were not racially diverse relative to the Democratic primary electorate in 2016.

For Republicans, the challenge is even greater. Partisan politics has grown increasingly polarized since the 1980s and, with the exception of Barack Obama's first election, every presidential race since 2000 has been a hard-fought affair that could have plausibly gone the other way.

These political divisions dovetail with racial ones. George W. Bush won single-digit black support in his first presidential race. The 1996 Republican ticket headed by Bob Dole, who voted for both the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965, and Jack Kemp, the party's most effusive proponent of minority outreach in the post-Reagan era, received 12 percent.

In Mississippi in 2004, 85 percent of whites voted for the Republican presidential candidate and 90 percent of blacks voted for the Democrat. That's with Bush, not Trump, as the GOP nominee and John Kerry, not Obama, as the Democratic standard-bearer.

Also from the Washington Examiner

"Where would you find the olive branch in the first six weeks? I haven't seen it," Durbin said.

02/27/17 10:03 AM

Mississippi is an extreme example, but not unrepresentative of the broader trajectory. In that kind of climate, it is easy for political rancor to become racialized, even without the long history of racism and conflict that did in fact precede it.

Similarly, it is very easy for a racially monolithic political movement to become insensitive to communities it does not represent. It is also difficult for groups that have more mixed feelings about, say, the Founding Fathers to be won over to the Right.

Secondly, conservative elites lost touch with many right-leaning voters. While the late Wall Street Journal editorial page editor Robert Bartley denied claims he said the nation-state was finished, he did support open borders.

With the end of the Cold War indeed, the end of history many on the center-right developed views on borders, sovereignty, immigration and multiculturalism that, while more market-oriented, that more closely resemble Mark Zuckerberg's views than those of millions of Americans who were voting Republican long before Trump came along.

In its own way, the utopianism of this vision was as simplistic as the "They took er jerbs!" zero-sum economic thinking ascribed to Trump voters. It is not surprising that it failed to gain much of a popular following.

Also from the Washington Examiner

"I consider the media to be indispensable to democracy," Bush said.

02/27/17 8:44 AM

When it came to disappearing factories and paychecks or a diminished sense of community, conservative elites brandished think tank papers countering these fearful observations, in effect channeling the comedian Richard Pryor and asking, "Who you gonna believe me or your lyin' eyes?"

The main exception before the Stephen Bannon era at Breitbart was conservative talk radio, which can at times be low-brow and irresponsible. But it also has to be responsive to its audience in a way that most conservative intellectuals do not. Perhaps the hosts weren't fanning the flames of economic nationalism but, in act of market signaling free enterprisers should have recognized, giving their consumers what they wanted.

President Trump, a businessman and reality TV star, eventually did too.

Voters who wanted a more ideologically consistent, limited-government conservatism don't feel they have much to show for their efforts either. Republicans have been running on repealing Obamacare since it passed. Now that the constellation of forces in Washington has lined up in a way that should make it happen, a former leader of those Republicans is tellling them it ain't gonna happen.

Many conservatives don't feel like their leaders are providing leadership, even as they have trouble relating to the other side of the political divide.

The mutually reinforcing challenges of racism and non-assimilation, the disconnect between conservative elites and much of the rank-and-file, and then the disconnect between that rank-and-file and much of the rest of an increasingly diverse country those factors dug a hole in the conservative movement.

Real conservatives must build something much bigger than the alt-right to fill it.

Here is the original post:
How the 'alt-right' came to haunt conservatism - Washington Examiner