Archive for the ‘Alt-right’ Category

Conservatives Must Purge the Alt-Right – Lynchburg News and Advance

Last year around this time (and the year before that), I was arguing with some of my fellow conservatives about the insanity of finding any common cause whatsoever with the so-called alt-right. The issue wasnt that every avowed nationalist who claimed membership in the alt-right was a Nazi or Klansman. It was that the alt-right was open to Nazis and Klansmen. And why wouldnt these newly minted white supremacists welcome such pioneering organizations to their cause?

Right-wing cynics, hucksters and opportunists deliberately blurred these distinctions in the name of a right-wing popular front. Steve Bannon, now a White House consigliere, is by most accounts not a bigot in his personal dealings. But when he ran Breitbart.com, he had no problem making it a platform for the alt-right. Internet entertainer Milo Yiannopoulos was a Breitbart star for his defenses of the alt-right and its supposedly hilarious Holocaust jokes. He was only let go (and disinvited from the Conservative Political Action Conference) when it was revealed he was equally broad-minded about some expressions of pedophilia as he was about some expressions of Nazism.

In Bannons case, and in the case of so many on the right who pulled their oars to the beat of Bannons drum, the motivation wasnt racism or anti-Semitism; it was the need to win at all costs (or to make a profit).

Win what? Well, that varied. At first it was the war on the establishment, including Fox News. Then one alleged civil war on the right or another. And, ultimately, the fight to get Donald Trump the nomination and the presidency.

As the primaries wound down, the imperative for unity intensified. Why look under rocks when you can use them as stepping stones to victory? Besides, Trump was making it as clear as possible that he welcomed support and praise from any quarter.

The rights game of footsie with the alt-right ostensibly ended when Trump won. Bannon disavowed them once he made it to the White House. Like France after the liberation, it seemed everyone was suddenly a member of the resistance and nobody was a collaborator. At least, that is, until Saturday, when the president invited speculation that the old popular front is still operational.

Whatever its status at the White House, the alt-right thinks it will replace the traditional right. It wont, for the simple reason that the vast, overwhelming majority of conservatives are patriotic and decent, just like Americans generally. They dont want anything to do with people who want to overthrow the Constitution and set up racial Bantustans.

No, the real threat to traditional conservatism is the mindset that made it possible to form even a theoretical alliance with the alt-right in the first place: the idea that winning and fighting are self-justifying.

Over the last decade, many on the right have convinced themselves that the real problem with conservatism is a lack of will. They admiringly quote left-wing activist Saul Alinsky admiringly and claim that we have to be like them by doing whatever is necessary to win.

During the campaign, when Trump attacked the ethnicity of an American judge or the parents of a fallen Muslim U.S. soldier, the response from his defenders on the right was usually, At least he fights!

Such amorality was warranted, many explained, because if Clinton had won, America would be over. National security official Michael Anton, then writing from the safety of anonymity, dubbed it a Flight 93 election and argued that conservatives must do anything for victory or accept certain death. In an interview with New York magazine, Anton went further. If we must have Caesar, he said, who do you want him to be? One of theirs? Or one of yours (ours)?

The election is over. Yet that spirit not only endures, it has intensified. Trumps conservative critics, or apostates as Conrad Black calls us, face the same ultimatum. The choice, for sane conservatives, Black writes, is Trump or national disaster. Black is hardly alone in making this or similar cases. The upshot of them all is that the test for sane (or real or good or true) conservatives is loyalty to the president, not to any coherent body of ideas or ideals. Even truth takes a back seat

Id point out that such thinking could invite the worst and most opportunistic creatures to infiltrate the movement. Except they already have.

Goldberg is a fellow at the American Enterprise Institute and a senior editor of National Review. Email him at goldbergcolumn@gmail.com or follow him on Twitter @JonahNRO.

See the original post:
Conservatives Must Purge the Alt-Right - Lynchburg News and Advance

Evolution According to the ‘Alt-right’: Journalists, Blacks and Jews Among the Subhuman – Haaretz

U.S. study entitled 'A Psychological Profile of the Alt-Right' unveils the specifics of the race theory embraced by the movement

NEW YORK American researchers have published a working paper showing that people identifying with the alt-right consider Jews, Mexicans, blacks, Democrats, journalists, feminists and Muslims as subhumans, below homo sapiens on the evolutionary scale.

The study, entitled "A Psychological Profile of the Alt-Right," unveils the specifics of the race theory embraced by the movement. For example, unlike other far-right groups, members of the alt-right do not rank Jews at the bottom of the racial hierarchy.

In the study, Prof. Patrick Forscher of the University of Arkansas and Prof. Nour Kteily of Northwestern University questioned 447 people who identify with the alt-right and 382 members of a control group who do not.

The study is a working paper; it has not yet been published in a scholarly journal. The initial findings were released two days before the Unite the Right demonstration in Charlottesville, Virginia, where a man has been charged with murder for allegedly ramming his car into a crowd, killing a 32-year-old woman and injuring 19 people.

To study the dehumanization of various social groups by the alt-right, Forscher and Kteily showed their subjects the iconic March of Progress illustration describing the five phases of human evolution, from apes to homo sapiens, and asked them to mark where various population groups fell.

We've got more newsletters we think you'll find interesting.

Please try again later.

This email address has already registered for this newsletter.

On average, those identifying with the alt-right placed whites, Republicans, Americans, Swedes and Christians at evolutions highest level of development as homo sapiens. The other groups were ranked as belonging to earlier evolutionary stages. Among the inferior groups, in descending order reflecting an alleged lack of development, were Jews, Mexicans, blacks, Democrats, journalists, feminists and Muslims.

The members of the control group ranked all the groups as homo sapiens except for Donald Trump, whose name the researchers had offered for classification by the respondents. The control group put the president one stage lower than modern humans. Both groups were also asked to rank Hillary Clinton; alt-right adherents placed Clinton at the level of Muslims, two stages below modern humans.

The researchers also studied the extremism of members of the alt-right based on aggressiveness and so-called Dark Triad traits including narcissism, Machiavellianism and psychopathy that are associated with callous, manipulative behavior. They determined that the alt-right respondents fell into two subcategories, one that the researchers dubbed supremacist, the less extreme one populists.

Members of the supremacist group showed traits of narcissism, psychopathy and aggression, and said they had engaged in violent behavior such as threats and harassment, both in social encounters and online.

The members of the second alt-right group were more moderate; they were less aggressive and more concerned with issues such as government corruption. But both alt-right groups viewed major media outlets such as CNN, The New York Times and The Wall Street Journal with suspicion. They opposed Black Lives Matter and expressed concerns about discrimination against males and whites in the United States.

In the paper, Forscher and Kteily said they found some of the findings surprising and contrary to the stereotype attributed to the alt-right. For example, in questions about the social relations of the extremists whom they examined, there were no significant differences between them and the control group.

Contrary to the image of the troll hiding in his parents basement, members of the alt-right reported having close social relationships at levels similar to the control group. Also, there were no significant differences in the level of concern that alt-right members and the general population had about the state of the U.S. economy.

Want to enjoy 'Zen' reading - with no ads and just the article? Subscribe today

Go here to see the original:
Evolution According to the 'Alt-right': Journalists, Blacks and Jews Among the Subhuman - Haaretz

Total Eclipse, Sheryl Sandberg’s Massive Donation, Women of the Alt-Right – Fortune

When no one's listening. While much attention has been paid recently to sexism in tech (for good reason), a new study published this month serves as an excellent reminder that workplace cultures that are hostile to women are not exclusive to Silicon Valley.

Alice Wu, who will start her doctoral studies in economics at Harvard next year,mined more than a million posts from an anonymous online message board frequented by economists. The site, econjobrumors.com ,began as a place for economists to exchange gossip about who is hiring and being hired in the profession. Over time, it evolved into a virtual water cooler frequented by economics faculty members, graduate students and others.

Wu's analysis of the posts yielded a result that is disturbing to say the least: the 30 words most commonly associated with women (in order) are:hotter, lesbian, bb (short for baby), sexism, tits, anal, marrying, feminazi, slut, hot, vagina, boobs, pregnant, pregnancy, cute, marry, levy, gorgeous, horny, crush, beautiful, secretary, dump, shopping, date, nonprofit, intentions, sexy, dated and prostitute.

Again, because I feel this needs repeating: Those are the words most commonly usedon the forum in association with women.The list of words associated with men reveals no similarly singular theme. It includes words that are relevant to economics, such as adviser, Austrian (a school of thought in economics), mathematician, pricing, textbook, and Wharton.

There does, however, seem to be a silver lining embedded in the white paperin the form of the researcher herself. When asked whether her research made her want to reconsider pursuing a career in economics, Wu said that on the contrary, it suggests that more women should be in this field changing the landscape. New York Times

Total Eclipse.The Atlantic has reprinted Annie Dillard's classic 1982 essay, "Total Eclipse,"which describes the author's personal experience of a solar eclipse in Washington State. Among my favorite lines of this nonfiction masterpiece (and one that makes me wish I was in the path of totalityfor today's event): "A partial eclipse is very interesting. It bears almost no relation to a total eclipse. Seeing a partial eclipse bears the same relation to seeing a total eclipse as kissing a man does to marrying him, or as flying in an airplane does to falling out of an airplane. Although the one experience precedes the other, it in no way prepares you for it." The Atlantic

Sheryl shells it out.According to a documentfiled Thursday with the Securities and Exchange Commission, Sheryl Sandberg has transferred 590,000 shares of Facebook stockworth nearly $100 millionto a fund she uses for charitable giving. Fortune

Student turns teacher. Arista Networks CEO Jayshree Ullal, a former long-time Cisco exec who was once close to former chief John Chambers, is cutting into the software giant's networking business and winning over its customers. The two companies are battling it out in court (Cisco has accused Arista of stealing its technology, which the latter denies)but the feud is also personal.WSJ

Women of the alt-right. While its difficult to determine just how many women identify with the alt-right,the lack of a female presence in Charlottesville shouldnt be read as an absence of women in the white nationalist movement overall. George Hawley, author ofMaking Sense of the Alt-Right, estimates that 20% of alt-right supporters are female. The Atlantic

Not ready to forgive. The White House said Thursday that it was working on identifying a time thats convenient for [Heather Heyer's] family to speak with the president." Heather's mom, however, says she wants nothing to do with Donald Trump after what he said about my child. She's referring to the president's comments last week that "both sides" were responsible for the violence in Charlottesville. Bloomberg

Women of sex tech. A tech-savvy and female-led womens sexuality movement has made its home in New York City. Its members, many of them under 40, are updating sex toys and related products with their own needs in mind and leading the companiesincluding Dame Products, Unbound, House of Plume, and Sustainthat sell them. New York Times

You're so AWOK. Have you ever seen the four-letter abbreviation AWOK floating around online? It has nothing to do with wokeness(which had been my personal theory for a while), but stands for Anna Wintour OK"as in, Vogue 's editor-in-chief has given you her blessing. Vogue

Share today's Broadsheet with a friend.Looking for previous Broadsheets? Click here.

Read more from the original source:
Total Eclipse, Sheryl Sandberg's Massive Donation, Women of the Alt-Right - Fortune

Why are women joining the ‘alt-right’? – PBS NewsHour

HARI SREENIVASAN, PBS NEWSHOUR WEEKEND ANCHOR: In the wake of the violence and tragedy in Charlottesville, Virginia, last Saturday, much of the past week has been spent examining the so-called alt right the ideology, based on white nationalism, rejects Jewish people, people of color, those in the LGBTQ community and immigrants, and its typically seen as a movement made up of white men.

However, as reporter Seyward Darby writes in the September issue of Harpers magazine, there is a disturbing trend worth paying attention to. Seyward Darby joins me now.

The women, the women have not really been in the imagery that weve seen just in the past week, but as you find out, they exist, and theyre growing in numbers.

SEYWARD DARBY, REPORTER, HARPERS MAGAZINE: I went into this story with a simple question, and that was, where are the women? And I started to think of this question last winter around the time that, you know, millions of women around the country were organizing for the womens march on Washington, and simultaneously, the alt-right was celebrating Trumps victory and being portrayed as a movement of young white men.

And I went looking for these women, and they very much exist. And there is a cluster of them that are very vocal on YouTube, Twitter, sometimes in real life at conferences and events. And they are very keen to let other women know that theyre there, and that the alt-right is a place where, if theyre white women of a certain mind, they would be welcome.

SREENIVASAN: So, whats the allure? I mean, when you see the displays of sort of bravado that some of these men exhibit, why would women want to be there? Is it because they like that sort of manliness of manhood, or do they see a place for them in the organization?

DARBY: The short answer is yes. They very much like the idea of alpha men who embrace a very sort of aggressive form of masculinity. But in terms of the place women see for themselves, they dont believe that these men are misogynistic in the way that people looking from the outside might.

They think that the men of the alt-right just understand biology and that men and women are fundamentally different, not equal, but equally important, and that men should be alpha, macho, fighting battles, running countries, making policy, whereas women have an equally important role on the home front, nurturing family units, inculcating the beliefs of this movement. They would say they dont see that as, you know, submission or subjugation. They would say that its equally important, almost like a yin and yang.

SREENIVASAN: So, what kind of numbers are we talking about here?

DARBY: Its really hard to say. And I spoke to many academics who have studied right-wing extremism for a long time, and they said because the alt-right is ultimately this movement from the Internet, very motley, very disparate, from comment boards and various social media platforms, its really hard to get a sense of precise numbers. In terms of women within it, the number you hear bandied about is 15 percent to 20 percent. But theyre not necessarily the ones youre going to see in Charlottesville.

SREENIVASAN: Lets talk also about the network effects here. How do these women congregate online? How do they meet each other? How do they get recruited?

DARBY: I think it is a deeply, deeply inside the Internet in a way that can take a while if youre an outsider to find, to see the patterns of connection. They will say that there are meet-ups happening in real life that, you know, women are organizing in ways you cant see, but I do think fundamentally most of this is happening on these various Internet platforms.

SREENIVASAN: Is there a moment that they see coming? I mean, do they see their influence increasing?

DARBY: They will say that they do. They would say that the moment is now, that were seeing it. They dont necessarily see Donald Trump as alt-right. Lana Lokteff, for instance, when I met and interviewed her, she pointed blank said, hes not one of our guys.

SREENIVASAN: Yes.

DARBY: But hes got the coattails that they felt they needed to be pulled more so into the mainstream. And what were seeing in Charlottesville and other places where the alt-right is, you know, stepping out into the world to show themselves. I think that they very much see this as the moment when they can garner more followers.

They want it to seem like they have a lot of momentum. Whether or not they do

SREENIVASAN: Yes.

DARBY: its hard to say.

SREENIVASAN: All right. Seyward Darby has this as one of the big stories in Harpers thanks so much for joining us.

DARBY: Thank you so much for having me.

See original here:
Why are women joining the 'alt-right'? - PBS NewsHour

Alt-Right: Are Racists Mentally Ill? Some Psychiatrists Say Yes – Newsweek

The scores of people carrying flaming torches and chanting Jews will not replace us last weekend in Charlottesville, Virginia, bore the message of the alt-right, the name given to the white supremacist movement dedicated to eradicating religious and ethnic minorities from America. This racist uprising will be followed by at least nine rallies this weekendostensibly dedicated to free speech but sure to broadcast messages of hateacross the U.S., held by members of the Ku Klux Klan, neo-Nazis, and other groups.

The 'Unite the Right' rally in Charlottesville, VA, where white supremacists march with tiki torchs through the University of Virginia campus. Getty Images/Zach D. Roberts

Manyfind the sight of hundreds of racists chanting their intentions for a so-called "ethno-state" and the forceful removal from Americaof anyone who isn't whitehorrific. But othersnamely, some psychiatristssee these individualsas mentally ill. Which leads to a disturbing question: Are we seeing the emergence of a nationalist movement fueled by prejudice or a widespread personality disorder that requires psychiatric care? Answering thatdredges up long-held notions about racism in America.

Keep up with this story and more by subscribing now

In the 1960s, Alvin Poussaint, now a professor of psychiatry at Harvard Medical School, was providing medical and psychological care to civil rights activists in Jackson, Mississippi. As a black psychiatrist in the South, he often feared for his life. He witnessed many acts of violence, cared for victims of racist acts and had frequent run-ins with state troopers. Once, when he told an aggressive police officer that he was a doctor, the officer continuedtocallhim boy with a hand onthe gun in his holster. I saw the malignancy of the racism much more clearly, and the genocidal element of the extreme racism where they wanted to kill you, Poussaint tells Newsweek.

He wondered if that hatred was an actual sickness that could be diagnosed and potentially treated. When he wasin his early 30s, anda prominent psychiatrist at Tufts Medical School, Poussaint and several other black psychiatrists approached the American Psychiatric Association (APA) with the idea that extreme racism wasnt just a social problem or a cultural issue. To these professionals, extreme racismthe kind that leads to violencewas a mental illness.

Poussaint and his colleagues wanted the APA to include extreme racism in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) as a delusional disorder. The DSM is the definitive guideline used by mental health clinicians to diagnose patients.

The DSM is not infallible. Over the years, it hasprovidedinsights into the countrys ever-changing values and belief systems. Homosexuality, for example, wasnt completely omitted from the DSM until the late 1980s. The last time the APA revised the DSM (in 2013) they declined the request by a group of psychiatrists to add pornography and sex addiction to the index. For psychiatrists updating the guidea process that can take more than a decadedoing so means wrestling with the very nature of humanity, what is normal and abnormal when it comes to behavior and beliefs.

Poussaint wasnt arguing about the relatively milder beliefs that cause a person to stereotype and classify groups of people negatively. Rather, he and the other psychiatrists were addressing the kind of racism that leads to violent behavior, like killing and injuring people by driving a car into a crowd, as happened in Charlottesville. That extreme form of racism, said Poussaint, could reasonably be classified as paranoid and delusional.

In July 2017, Ku Klux Klan protests planned removal of General Lee statue from park in Charlottesville, Virginia. Chet Strange/Getty Images

The APA was unreceptive. There was a lot of resistance to the idea, he says. The problem, Poussaint explains, was that those in charge saw racism as too ubiquitous to diagnose. They felt racism was so embedded in culture, that it was almost normative, that you had to deal with all the cultural factors that lead to this behavior,

Members of the APA also argued that the extreme racism is amental illness claim lacked hard science. That objection was weak, says Poussaint, because many mental health diagnoses listed in the DSM don't have a solid scientific premise, including personality disorders. Some APAmembers said classifyingextreme racism as an illness would excuse terrible beliefs and reprehensible behavior.

But Poussaint wasnt interested in excusing or stigmatizing behavior;he wanted to help people he believed were sick. Inclusionin the DSM, he insisted, could allow individuals suffering from extreme racism to access services such as state-mandated psychiatric counseling, and therefore benefit society because, it could protect people they might otherwise attack.

Poussaint still believes extreme racism is a form of paranoia and should be treated that way. In therapy, a psychiatrist would help the patient understand the origins of their racism. Like any psychotherapy or treatment you would try to tie it all together, he says. Other psychiatrists have testified and acknowledged such individuals may improve from treatment when they come to understand these beliefs and why they are projecting them onto other people and acting out.

Racism as a Symptom

The question of whether extreme racism is a mental illness still haunts psychiatry. About 15 years ago, Carl Bell, a psychiatrist at Jackson Park Hospital Family Medicine Clinic and professor of clinical psychiatry at the University of Illinois at Chicagos School of Medicine, resurrected Poussaints attempt to convince the APA to classify racism as a mental disorder. But Bell tried a different tack from Poussaint. He viewed extreme racism as a type of pathological bias that signaled an underlying personality disorder.

Bell proposed adding pathological bias to the DSM as a trait of personality disorder. With that addition, extreme bigotry would be a majorcriterionfor the diagnosis. The broad term could also apply to individuals who direct violence and hatred toward other groups, such as gays or women.

But again, the APA said no. When I raised this issue for the personality disorders working group they shut me down, says Bell, they were like, Hell, no. As in decades past, the APA justified their objection on the grounds that racism is and always has been entrenched insociety.

The difficulty is that if you are in a racist society, how do you tease that out from biology or personality? says Bell, whocould not even convince the APA to study why racist thoughts and action manifest in some people during manic episodes.

The Association did finally issue a statement in 2006 acknowledging that some psychiatric factors cause a person to become racist,although further research would be needed to explore this hypothesis. The group also noted that racist beliefs and behavior often cause depression and psychiatric illness in people who are subject to them. In a statement provided to Newsweek about its approach to prejudice-based violence, Saul Levin, CEO and Medical Director of the APA, said,"The APA has a longstanding policy noting the negative impact of racism and mental health. APA policy supports public education efforts and research on racism and its adverse impact on mental health."

Bell and other experts continue to view some instances of racism as a symptom of other disorders. Racist thoughts and actions are often a manifestation of some other established and diagnosable mental disorder, says Bell. People with narcissistic personality disordera mental condition many experts have claimed Trump has often have fixed valuesrooted in racism. Dylann Roof, the teen white supremacist convicted of killing nine black people at a church in Charleston, South Carolina, in 2015, had been diagnosed with schizoid personality disorder. People with conditions such as schizophrenia and bipolar disorder often experience extreme paranoia related to race or ethnicity, though not always violence.

Outside the court hearing for James Alex Fields, the suspect who drove his car into a crowd in Charlottesville, Virginia, Matthew Heinbach, of the white nationalist Traditionalist Workers Party, shouts at journalists. Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

There is also evidence that most of us harbor prejudices, leading some experts to believewe are hardwired to discriminate in some fashion (though not specificallyagainst others). The Implicit Association test (IAT), a tool used to understand the roots and extent of bias, measures impulses of subconscious racismfor example, whether we associate certain types of people with negative or positive feelings. The test, which was developed by social psychologists at Harvard, the University of Virginiaand the University of Washington more than two decades ago, has been taken by more than 17 million people. The results show that at least 90 percent of Americans are at least slightly biased against people unlike themselves. Psychologists remain split on where to draw the line, though. Some say discrimination requires a diagnosis when thoughts become actions. But others doubt whether acting on racist beliefs warrants a label of its own.

This Is Not Normal

The fact that many people who act on extreme racist beliefs leadhigh-functioning lives may also stand in the way of labeling this demographic as mentally ill. In the early 1960s, Jewish author and journalist Hannah Arendt covered the trials of Nazi war criminal Adolf Eichmann for theNew Yorker. She was shocked that half a dozen psychiatrists had certified Eichmann as normal, despite the fact that he orchestrated the mass murder of millions of Jews. One psychiatrist described his familial relationships as not just normal but desirable.

In the decades following the Holocaust, the idea that someone who commits crimes against racial and ethnic minorities could still be considered sane by psychiatrists was unsettling, says James M. Thomas, an assistant professor of sociology at the University of Mississippi. Many people turned to the explanation that there must be something wrong with the German psyche to have allowed this to happen.

Social scientists knew that creating a clinical definition was critical. They understood that stigmatizing extreme racism could help society wake up to the abnormality of this pathology, and possibly prevent other genocidal acts. Three psychologists devised the California F-scale F stands for fascista test used to evaluate a person for authoritarian personality type. They thought understanding how people wereseduced by Adolf Hitlers rhetoric could help prevent future such movements. Although the F-scale fell out of favor, it enabled psychologiststo identify common traits of people who cling to dangerous ideologies. They included an inflexible outlook, strong allegiance to leadership, a tendency to scapegoat others and a willingness to lash out in anger and violence.

In Charlottesville, Virginia, on July 8, 2017, members of the Ku Klux Klan gesture during a rally calling for the protection of Southern Confederate monuments. Andrew Caballero-Reynolds/AFP/Getty Images

Sander Gilman, who teaches psychiatry at Emory University, and co-authored with Thomas the book Are Racists Crazy?, agrees that dangerous racists leadingseemingly normal lives are hard to identify. Racists, sadly,cope quite well with daily life, says Gilman. They have a take on the way the world should be, and that take functions in the world they live.

Gilman does not favora standalone diagnosis of extreme racism, and believes that attempts to categorize such people as mentally ill masks the greater problem of society allowing them to commit vengeful acts. Those people are evil. Theyve made bad choices, but theyre not choices you can then attribute to mental illness, says Gilman.The minute you do that you let people off the hook.

Link:
Alt-Right: Are Racists Mentally Ill? Some Psychiatrists Say Yes - Newsweek