Archive for June, 2023

Telegram Outlets Linked To Iran-Backed Militias In Iraq: Wagner … – Middle East Media Research Institute

The following report is now acomplimentaryoffering from MEMRI's Jihad and Terrorism Threat Monitor (JTTM). For JTTM subscription information,click here.

The Sabereen News Telegram channel, which supports Iran-backed militias in Iraq, reported on May 31, 2023 that the Russia-backed Wagner PMC group had posthumously awarded a Russian medal and Black Cross ribbon to an Iraqi fighter named Abbas Abu Dharr Witwit, who was reportedly residing in Russia.[1]

For more about the involvement of jihadi groups in the Russia-Ukraine conflict, see MEMRIs studyThe Jihadi Conflict Inside The Russia-Ukraine War.

According to the post, Witwit who was killed on April 6, 2023 had a residency in Russia. "The Wagner Company grants the families of an Iraqi martyr the most prestigious medal of courage given to a resident of Russia who met martyrdom during the confrontations to liberate the city of Bakhmut," said the post.

The channel also shared a video of a Wagner representative giving the medal and the ribbon to a man who is identified in the post as Witwit's parent. In the video the father who spoke in Arabic language, praised his son, saying that "he was a hero, and he died like a hero, for the sake of freedom,a multipolar world and against the [powers] of arrogance."

The Putin's Friends in Iraq Telegram channel shared an English-language post reading: "[Witwit] selflessly gave his life while defending the ideals of freedom, justice and a multipolar world that America does not control. He dedicated his life to fighting against oppression, imperialism, and injustice. Believing that every person has the right to live in a world free from tyranny and fear, he devoted himself to the cause of defending these values and making them a reality."[2]

Witwit is a well-known Iraqi Shiite tribe that descends from Hilla city in Babil Province and Kurbela Province.

Over the past months, there have been several reports of jihadis who spent years fighting in Iraq and Syria now fighting in Ukraine, on both sides of the conflict.[3]

[1]Telegram, May 31, 2023.

[2]Telegram, May 31, 2023.

[3]See MEMRI JTTM Report:The Jihadi Conflict Inside The Russia-Ukraine War, May 22, 2023.

Read more here:
Telegram Outlets Linked To Iran-Backed Militias In Iraq: Wagner ... - Middle East Media Research Institute

Essential Education: Professor, attorney discuss importance of … – LA Downtown News Online

University of California, Los Angeles, alumnus and associate professor Bobby Rimas of the American legal systems course at California State University, Los Angeles Downtown LA Campus, lectured on the importance of subpoenas and what should be done to ensure compliance on May 10.

Additionally, Rimas indicated that subpoenas allow for parties to learn about information or evidence that may be used for their cases.

Rimas then introduced guest speaker Andrew Beshai, an associate attorney at Larson LLP.

Beshai spoke about the difference between civil and criminal subpoenas, how subpoenas can request for court appearance, document productions or both. Furthermore, civil subpoenas can be issued by any lawyer but not a prosecutor.

Beshai also discussed the Fifth Amendment constitutional right not to self-incriminate.

Prior to his role as a federal prosecutor, Beshai was a trial attorney with the U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Rights Division, where he investigated and litigated discrimination cases against state and local entities in Mississippi, Alabama, Tennessee, Louisiana and Colorado.

As a trial lawyer with the DOJ Civil Rights Division, Beshai also worked on complex matters, including taking depositions, developing discovery strategy and arguing motions. He graduated valedictorian from Loyola Law School, where he served for two years as an adjunct professor teaching legal drafting.

Rimas indicated that Beshais presentation was very informative and gave students a clear picture as to the significance of subpoenas and what they should consider doing when assisting their legal teams with such matters.

In addition to being an associate professor, Rimas is a paralegal at the Larson LLP law firm and an adjunct faculty member at the University of La Verne. He is also the vice chair of the special committee on diversity, equity and inclusion for a Los Angeles-based nonprofit organization and a board member for the UCLA Lambda Alumni Association.

Rimas graduated with a bachelors degree in history from UCLA and a Master of Legal Studies degree, cum laude, from the University of Arizona James E. Rogers College of Law.

He is the past chair/president of the UCLA Pilipino Alumni Association and past president of the Los Angeles Paralegal Association.

The rest is here:
Essential Education: Professor, attorney discuss importance of ... - LA Downtown News Online

Inside The Murder Of Kristin Smart And How Her Killer Was Caught – All That’s Interesting

On May 25, 1996, Kristin Smart was murdered by her classmate Paul Flores at California Polytechnic State University. He walked free for nearly three decades until a podcast helped solve the case.

Kristin Smart disappeared on May 25, 1996, while walking back to her dorm at California Polytechnic State University in San Luis Obispo, California after an off-campus party. No one saw the 19-year-old again and six years later, in 2002, Smart was declared legally dead in absentia.

For decades, it seemed like no one would ever know, for certain, what happened to Kristin Smart. The police had a person of interest in Paul Flores, Smarts classmate who walked her home the night she vanished and the last person to see her alive. But Flores maintained his innocence, and police were unable to gather enough hard evidence against him.

Then, in 2019, a budding freelance journalist named Chris Lambert created the podcast Your Own Backyard, which covered Smarts disappearance and reignited interest in the case, helping to bring new information to light. These developments galvanized further investigation into Smarts murder, which produced enough evidence to officially name Paul Flores as her killer.

Heres everything you need to know about the case.

Kristin Denise Smart was born on February 20, 1977, in Augsburg, Bavaria, West Germany, to Stan and Denise Smart, who were both teaching children of American military service members who were overseas. The Smarts later moved to Stockton, California, where their children attended school.

In 1995, Kristin Smart graduated from high school in Stockton and enrolled at California Polytechnic State University in San Luis Obispo, California.

Then, on May 25, 1996, Smart now a 19-year-old freshman attended an off-campus party. She left around 2 a.m., but she didnt leave alone. She was accompanied by three other Cal Poly students, including Paul Flores.

Unbeknownst to Smart, Flores had earned a negative reputation among women at Cal Poly. According to a 2006 Los Angeles Times report, he had been nicknamed Chester the Molester for his behavior at parties.

According to Flores, after he and Smart split off from the other students who had left the party, he and Smart walked toward his dorm in Santa Lucia Hall. He claimed that Smart then headed to her room in the nearby Muir Hall by herself. Kristin Smart was never seen again after that night.

Two days later, Smarts neighbor in her dorm reached out to campus police and Smarts parents, as Smart had seemingly vanished into thin air. It was only because of this students insistence that campus police opened an investigation, as they had initially assumed that Smart had voluntarily disappeared for a brief period and would be back on campus soon.

An incident report from campus police at the time also seemed to judge Smart harshly for drinking alcohol at the off-campus party shortly before her disappearance, according to her family. The report read:

Smart does not have any close friends at Cal Poly. Smart appeared to be under the influence of alcohol on Friday night. Smart was talking with and socializing with several different males at the party. Smart lives her life in her own way, not conforming to typical teenage behavior. These observations are in no way implying that her behavior caused her disappearance, but they provide a picture of her conduct on the night of her disappearance.

Despite the slow start of the investigation, missing-person posters and billboards began to pop up in public places and along roads in the area, offering rewards for information that could help find Kristin Smart.

Soon, two investigators from the district attorneys office were called in to help the campus police with the case, and they quickly zeroed in on Flores. When they interviewed him, they noticed numerous inconsistencies in his story, most notably his changing story about how he got a black eye.

Flores was eventually identified as a person of interest, but he denied any involvement in Smarts disappearance. And despite his suspicious behavior, police struggled to definitively link him to the crime.

In June 1996, the San Luis Obispo County Sheriffs Office took over the Kristin Smart case. The Cal Poly campus was then combed over by police and volunteers alike. When cadaver dogs were brought in to search the dorms at Cal Poly, three of them reacted to what had been Flores room.

Then, in the fall of 1996, a woman named Mary Lassiter was renting a house that belonged to Paul Flores mother Susan in Arroyo Grande, California. During her stay, she found a single womans earring in the driveway that appeared to match a necklace worn by Smart on one of the billboards she had seen of the missing teenager. Lassiter turned the earring over to the police but they lost it before they could mark it as evidence.

Susan Flores house naturally became the focus of widespread speculation, though police only searched it later on in the investigation. Though the backyard was searched several times, no further evidence was found there.

As reported by Yahoo! News, police eventually did find biological evidence of Smarts body at a different Flores property but that was more than two decades after the first investigation. With police unable to build a strong enough case early on, Flores was not initially arrested or charged.

Then, in 1997, the Smart family filed a $40 million wrongful death lawsuit against Paul Flores, still the main person of interest in the case.

During a deposition later that year for the civil suit, Flores invoked the Fifth Amendment 27 times on the advice of his lawyer.

The only answers he provided were his name, his birth date, and his Social Security number. He would not, on the other hand, answer questions about whether he was a Cal Poly student in May 1996, the name of his father, or even if he cooked hamburgers at his job at Garlands Hamburgers.

The tactic seemingly worked, with police soon admitting that without any new information from Flores, the investigation had stalled.

We need Paul Flores to tell us what happened to Kristin Smart, said San Luis Obispos then-Sheriff Ed Williams. The fact of the matter is we have very qualified detectives who have conducted well over a hundred interviews, and everything leads to Mr. Flores. There are no other suspects. So absent something from Mr. Flores, I dont see us completing this case.

In 2002, six years after her disappearance, Kristin Smart was declared legally dead in absentia and Flores was still a free man, according to The New York Times. For several years, the case would remain at a standstill, and the Smarts seemed to be no closer to getting justice for their daughter.

But things started to look up in 2011 when San Luis Obispo got a new sheriff.

When Sheriff Ian Parkinson took the job, he made a promise to the Smart family that solving Kristin Smarts case would be a top priority.

And he kept his promise. Parkinsons department would carry out 23 search warrants and 96 interviews. They also collected 258 pieces of evidence. Through it all, they still had only one suspect: Paul Flores.

Still, the case against Flores was missing evidence. But in 2019, the investigation got some much-needed aid from an unlikely source: a podcast focused on Smarts disappearance by freelance journalist Chris Lambert.

Lambert, who was only eight years old when Kristin Smart disappeared in 1996 and had no initial connection with her family, helped spark a wave of new information about the case that would help lead to Flores arrest.

According to Vanity Fair, Chris Lambert lived about half an hour from Cal Polys campus, and had no formal training as a journalist or documentarian, yet the Kristin Smart case endlessly fascinated him.

One day, he emailed his girlfriend a link to a Los Angeles Times story about Smart, jokingly saying that he was going to solve the case. He also told a writer friend of his about his interest in Smarts disappearance, and the friend told him that she remembered the Smart story from years earlier.

That same friend later emailed Lambert with more information: I cant believe I didnt tell you; I went to school with the guy who walked her home that night. I went to high school with him. We all called him Scary Paul.

This inspired him to create a podcast about the case in 2019, and it quickly became a hit, garnering nearly 75,000 streams on the day that the first episode was posted. As word spread about the podcast, more and more people began reaching out to Lambert with new information about Smart and Flores. Multiple people alleged seeing Flores taking advantage of several inebriated women, and some even accused Flores of sexual assault.

Lambert also began a working relationship with the San Luis Obispo County Sheriffs Office, sharing sources and letting the police interview them before he would. When Paul Flores was finally arrested for Kristin Smarts murder in April 2021, many people including the police and Smarts family looked to Lamberts podcast as a driving force behind the investigation. (Pauls father Ruben was also arrested and charged with being an accessory after the murder, as it was believed he helped his son hide Smarts body.)

Chris was able to fill in a part of the puzzle along with the dedicated members of the sheriffs office who worked this case over the years and the district attorneys office who successfully prosecuted this case, Sheriff Parkinson said of the podcasts impact on the investigation.

Lambert was in attendance throughout the murder trial in 2022, which ended with Paul Flores, who was 45 years old at the time, being found guilty of the first-degree murder of Kristin Smart. He was later sentenced to 25 years to life in prison for the crime. (Pauls father, Ruben Flores, was acquitted of the accessory charge by a separate jury.)

It started to hit me in waves, and I just started crying, Lambert said. I was thinking about where this started, was thinking about my relationship with the Smart family.

Lambert had met Denise Smart shortly after he started the podcast and expressed his desire to share her daughters story the real story, not one that, like early reports, judged Smart for partying the night she vanished.

It was that victim shaming, Denise Smart said. People dont want to connect with that, because its like, Oh, its that girl with the shorts going to a party getting drunk? Oh, well, thats what happens when you do that. And my kids would never do that. Sharing the real story is so important. My friends and I call Chris an angel in disguise.

After learning about the case of Kristin Smart, see how DNA helped to solve a 40-year-old cold case murder of a California kindergartner. Then, dive into these 11 cold cases that were solved thanks to Unsolved Mysteries.

Visit link:
Inside The Murder Of Kristin Smart And How Her Killer Was Caught - All That's Interesting

Book Review: Re-engineering the Chess Classics by GM Matthew … – Chess.com

Matthew Sadler is a very strong grandmaster (2694 at age 49) and one of the leading computer chess experts. In 2019 he wrote the award-winning Game Changer with Natasha Regan about AlphaZero, and in 2021 he published The Silicon Road to Chess Improvement on how to use chess engines to improve your own game. In addition, Matthew kept the world appraised of the latest engine developments through his tweets and recaps of the Top Engine Chess Championships.

For this latest book Re-engineering the Chess Classics, he teamed up with Steve Giddins to evaluate 40 classical games through the eyes of Stockfish, Leela Chess Zero, and Komodo Dragon. The games are from the period 1852 to 1998 and include games from all the World Champions of that period.

Over the last five years, chess has been revolutionized by the research of AlphaZero, the subsequent implementation of their concepts in Leela Chess Zero, and finally, including neural network technology in Stockfish NNUE. The development of chess engines has been so strong that any opening analysis from before 2020 has lost much of its value. Can the classics stand the test of time?

The themes that emerge from analyzing the forty classics game will not surprise you:

Consider the position after 1.e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3.Bb5 d6 4.d4 Bd7 5. Nc3 Nge7 6.d5. The engine assessment after 6.d5 is over +2.5 for White, a decisive advantage.

The preference of engines for space has also led to some openings, like the Kings-Indian being hardly playable at the engine level.

Lets assume White moves up his h-pawn. For three tempi (h4-h5-h6), White creates dark square weaknesses on the kingside. The advanced h-pawn restricts the opponents king (mate on g7 but also mate on the back rank). Furthermore, White adds an attacker to his existing attack that might assist other attackers and tie down defenders. Finally, in the endgame, the h7-pawn might become a target.

The advance of the rooks pawn has also impacted the opening theory. For example: 1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 g6 3.Nc3 d5 4.Nf3 Bg7 5.h4 is now a popular Grnfeld Defence variation.

Mistakes come easily in bad positions, but not when you are an engine!

Humans tend to concentrate on one area of the board and devote all their efforts to breaking through on that side, whereas engines are masters at switching plans and creating threats over the whole board.

This was the traditional strength of chess engines and still is.

Interestingly, we play less well than engines because humans play with baggage. In bad positions, we stress out and cannot find the most stubborn defence. When we attack, we focus on breaking through and lack the agility to see the whole board and switch strategy when necessary. Engines play without memory or ego and look with objectivity at every position.

The development of the strongest engines has led to a reevaluation of the relative importance of material, activity, and space. If you want to see how the latest chess concepts impact 40 classics, this book is for you!

The book is currently on introductory offer at ForwardChess for $23.79 and can be pre-ordered at Amazon in hardcover for $34.95.

Continued here:
Book Review: Re-engineering the Chess Classics by GM Matthew ... - Chess.com

The Sparrow Effect: How DeepMind is Rewriting the AI Script – CityLife

The Sparrow Effect: How DeepMind is Rewriting the AI Script

The Sparrow Effect, a term coined to describe the incredible impact of DeepMinds artificial intelligence (AI) technology, is rewriting the AI script and transforming the way we think about machine learning. DeepMind, a London-based AI research lab acquired by Google in 2014, has been at the forefront of AI development, making groundbreaking strides in areas such as natural language processing, computer vision, and reinforcement learning. With its innovative approach to AI research and development, DeepMind is pushing the boundaries of what machines can do and revolutionizing the field of AI.

One of the most notable achievements of DeepMind is the development of AlphaGo, an AI program that stunned the world by defeating the world champion Go player, Lee Sedol, in 2016. Go, an ancient Chinese board game, is considered one of the most complex games in the world, with more possible board configurations than there are atoms in the universe. AlphaGos victory was a watershed moment in AI history, as it demonstrated that machines could not only learn to play complex games but also outperform human experts.

The success of AlphaGo was built on a technique called deep reinforcement learning, which combines deep neural networks with reinforcement learning algorithms. This approach allows AI systems to learn from their own experiences, rather than relying on pre-programmed rules or human input. By playing millions of games against itself, AlphaGo was able to develop its own strategies and refine its gameplay, ultimately surpassing human-level performance.

Following the success of AlphaGo, DeepMind turned its attention to other complex games, such as chess and shogi. In 2017, the company unveiled AlphaZero, an AI system that taught itself to play chess, shogi, and Go from scratch, without any prior knowledge of the games rules or strategies. In a matter of hours, AlphaZero was able to defeat world-class AI opponents in all three games, showcasing the power of deep reinforcement learning and the potential for AI to master a wide range of tasks.

DeepMinds achievements in game-playing AI have far-reaching implications for the broader field of AI research. By demonstrating that machines can learn complex tasks without human intervention, DeepMind has opened the door to a new era of AI development, in which AI systems can learn and adapt to new challenges autonomously. This has the potential to revolutionize industries such as healthcare, finance, and transportation, where AI could be used to optimize processes, make more accurate predictions, and even save lives.

For example, DeepMind has already made significant progress in applying its AI technology to healthcare. In 2018, the company developed an AI system capable of diagnosing eye diseases with the same accuracy as human experts, potentially helping to prevent blindness in millions of people worldwide. Additionally, DeepMind has been working on AI models that can predict the progression of diseases such as Alzheimers and Parkinsons, which could lead to earlier diagnoses and more effective treatments.

Despite the tremendous potential of DeepMinds AI technology, there are also concerns about the ethical implications of AI development. As AI systems become more powerful and autonomous, questions arise about the potential for job displacement, privacy violations, and even the possibility of AI systems making life-or-death decisions. To address these concerns, DeepMind has established an ethics and society research unit, which aims to ensure that AI is developed responsibly and in the best interests of humanity.

In conclusion, the Sparrow Effect, as exemplified by DeepMinds groundbreaking achievements in AI, is rewriting the AI script and opening up new possibilities for machine learning. By pushing the boundaries of what machines can do, DeepMind is not only revolutionizing the field of AI but also paving the way for a future in which AI systems can help us solve some of the worlds most pressing challenges. However, as we continue to explore the potential of AI, it is crucial that we also consider the ethical implications of this powerful technology and work to ensure that it is developed responsibly and for the benefit of all.

Excerpt from:
The Sparrow Effect: How DeepMind is Rewriting the AI Script - CityLife