Archive for June, 2023

The Role of Neuromorphic Computing in the Future of Quantum … – CityLife

Exploring the Synergy between Neuromorphic Computing and Quantum Computing for Advanced AI Applications

The rapid advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) have created a significant demand for powerful computing systems that can handle the massive amounts of data and complex algorithms involved in these fields. Traditional computing architectures, such as those based on the von Neumann model, are reaching their limits in terms of energy efficiency and processing capabilities. This has led researchers to explore alternative computing paradigms, such as neuromorphic computing and quantum computing, which hold the potential to revolutionize the way we process and analyze information.

Neuromorphic computing is a novel approach that aims to mimic the structure and function of the human brain in order to create more efficient and adaptive computing systems. It is based on the idea of using artificial neural networks, which are composed of interconnected artificial neurons, to process and store information. These networks can be implemented in hardware, using specialized electronic components, or in software, running on conventional computing platforms. Neuromorphic systems are designed to be highly parallel, fault-tolerant, and energy-efficient, making them well-suited for AI and ML applications.

Quantum computing, on the other hand, is a fundamentally different approach that relies on the principles of quantum mechanics to perform computations. Unlike classical computers, which use bits to represent information as either 0 or 1, quantum computers use quantum bits, or qubits, which can exist in multiple states simultaneously due to a phenomenon known as superposition. This allows quantum computers to perform certain types of calculations much faster than classical computers, potentially enabling them to solve problems that are currently intractable.

The synergy between neuromorphic computing and quantum computing is an exciting area of research that could lead to the development of advanced AI applications that were previously thought to be impossible. By combining the strengths of both paradigms, researchers hope to create hybrid systems that can tackle complex problems in areas such as natural language processing, pattern recognition, and decision-making.

One of the key challenges in developing such hybrid systems is finding ways to integrate neuromorphic and quantum components in a seamless and efficient manner. Researchers are exploring various techniques to achieve this, such as using quantum-inspired algorithms to train neuromorphic networks, or employing neuromorphic hardware to control and read out the states of qubits in a quantum processor.

Another important aspect of this research is the development of new materials and fabrication techniques that can support the implementation of neuromorphic and quantum devices. For example, researchers are investigating the use of superconducting materials, which can carry electrical currents without resistance, to create energy-efficient neuromorphic circuits and qubits. They are also exploring the potential of nanoscale structures, such as quantum dots and nanowires, to enable the miniaturization and integration of these devices.

As the field of neuromorphic-quantum computing continues to evolve, it is expected to have a profound impact on the future of AI and ML. By harnessing the power of both neuromorphic and quantum computing, researchers aim to develop systems that can learn and adapt in real-time, allowing them to handle complex tasks with greater speed and accuracy than ever before. This could lead to breakthroughs in areas such as robotics, autonomous vehicles, and personalized medicine, among others.

In conclusion, the synergy between neuromorphic computing and quantum computing holds great promise for the future of AI and ML applications. By exploring the potential of these two emerging paradigms, researchers are paving the way for the development of advanced computing systems that can tackle some of the most challenging problems in science and technology. As we continue to push the boundaries of what is possible with AI and ML, the integration of neuromorphic and quantum computing will undoubtedly play a crucial role in shaping the future of these fields.

Go here to read the rest:
The Role of Neuromorphic Computing in the Future of Quantum ... - CityLife

Pakistani Generals have a history of censoring media. Imran Khan is … – ThePrint

The trial ended in a few minutes: Four lashes would fall on the body of Khawar Naeem Hashmi, accused of defacing the mausoleum of Mohammad Ali Jinnah on Pakistans independence day in 1977. He was, arguably, lucky the other journalists who had joined him in a public protest against military dictatorship were sentenced to five lashes each. Lines were drawn on their backs to ensure the whip would fall with precision; army officers, Hashmi later recalled, would amuse their families by bringing them along to watch.

Lashings seemed to have become popular amusements in General Muhammad Zia-ul-Haqs time. A hundred thousand people gathered in a Karachi park to watch the punishment of Mohammed Kaleem, convicted of raping a child.

Earlier this week, newspaperowners and editors were called into meetings with Pakistans military brass and ordered to cease covering establishment darling-turned-insurrectionary Imran Khan. During his own term as Prime Minister, Imran and the Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) directorateused enforced disappearances, torture, and false criminal cases to terrorise journalists,evendriving some dissidents into exile.

Absar Alam was shot outside his house,expert Lynn ODonnell records. Asad Ali Toor was bound, gagged, and beaten inside his own home. Exiled critics even found themselves targeted for assassinationoverseas by hit squads alleged to have been hired by the ISI.

This time around, Imran has been made to wear the muzzle and chain he gleefully used on his opponentsand thats bad news for Pakistan.

Also read: Imran Khan supporters will call it a revolution. But Pakistan in ashes is the

Like much of the Indian media, the news industry of Pakistan was born in the ideological crucible of the freedom movement.Dawn, founded by Pakistan movement patriarch Mohammad Ali Jinnah, was converted from a weekly to a daily newspaper. Mir Khalil-ur-Rehmans Jang, Hamid NizamisNawa-i-Waqt,and Mian IftikharuddinsPakistan Times would drive the emergence of a new generation of post-independence media conglomerates.

Even though an organised media flowered,historians Saima Parveen and Muhammad Nawaz Bhattiremind us, it was not free to defend the democratic values; instead they were working to praise government policies. National interests, the glory of Islam, and the Ideology of Pakistanwerecatchphrases used to extend support from the press for the government.

General Ayub Khans military regime institutionalised this informal censorship. The Left-leaningPakistan Times,Imroz,andLail-o-Nahar were nationalised. The three mass-circulation newspapers run by former Prime Minister Zulfikar Ali Bhuttos family Musawat,Hilal-i-Pakistan, andNusrat also ended up in the hands of the State-owned National Press Trust.

ThePress and Publication Ordinance introduced by General Ayub and which, among other things, penalised the publication of crimes of violence or sex in a manner likely to excite unhealthy curiosity as well as information calculated to cause public alarm, frustration or despondencyprovided a powerful tool where gentler persuasion failed.

Future historians might debate just how significant censorship was as a tool of regime survival. The law, notably, could not stop Dhaka newspapers from publishing special supplements on 23 March 1971,theanniversary of the Muslim Leagues Pakistan resolution as Emancipation of Bangladesh Day.

Also read: Pakistan Army wont bounce back easily this time. Imran Khan shattering its illusion of

Following his installation as President after the 1971Bangladesh war,media expert JM Williams noted, Zulfikar Ali Bhutto started using more subtle kinds of coercion. The supply of newsprint was a State monopoly, and major advertisers like Pakistan International Airlines were also public-sector entities. The new President had promised to dissolve the National Press Trust earlier but rapidly concluded that the tyrants tool could serve its ends too.

The government moved to cancel the newsprint quotas ofJang,stopped advertising for Dawn, and bannedThe Sun.

General Zia, who seized power in 1977, tightened State control over the media. Even journalists were jailed. Four more Masudullah Khan, Iqbal Jafri, Khawar Naeem Hashmi, and Nisar Zaidi were flogged for organising apro-democracy hunger strike. As during Indian Prime Minister Indira Gandhis Emergency, pre-censorship of content was introduced in Pakistan.

Even though Zias regime modelled itself on the revolutionary Islamism of Iranian mullahs and the monarchical concentration of power of Saudi Arabia, those regimes managed to use their resources to address at least some of their economic and social problems. The same cannot be said of the Islamism of Zia,Ibrahim Karawan has noted.

FormerPrime Minister Benazir Bhutto did initiate an opening-up of media freedoms in the democratic revival that followed,buteditor Imran Aslamrecorded that her government routinely sought to buy off critical journalists. The military, for its part, maintained its own list of client writers as it battled the Prime Minister for control.

The Nawaz Sharifgovernmentrestored the use of blunt tools. The owner ofThe News, Mir Shakil-ur-Rahman, famously released taped conversations of two prominent government officials seeking to blackmail him into sacking critical journalists by threatening tax prosecutions.

Former military ruler General Pervez Musharraf cast himself as a defender of the free press and enabled the rise of private television news broadcasting. Even under Musharraf, though, journalists who crossed the establishment faced severe consequences. The journalist Syed Saleem Shahzadwas murdered, allegedlyby military agents.

Also read:The soured love affair between Imran Khan and Pakistan Army is a ticking time

Lessons for India

To Indians familiar withtheir ownmedia history, much of this story will be depressingly familiar. Like in Pakistan, a powerful illiberal impulse ran through Indian democratic institutionsafter Independence. Enraged by what he claimed was a partisan and communal media, Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru cracked down on press freedoms. Terrible, something terrible, he said of Indian journalism to the visitingscholar Michael Brecher. We put an end to it.

In 1950, the Supreme Court shot down the Government of Madras ban on the Left-wing weeklyCrossroads. Then, the court stopped the Delhi government from pre-censoring the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sanghs (RSS) magazineOrganiser. The government responded by resurrecting colonial-eraanti-free speech laws.

The Indian State also created a system of pelf and patronage to ensure it controlled the media. Even though the media sometimes fought back, it has rarely enjoyed genuine independence from the government.

Even though few of Imrans opponents have reason to shed tears for his fate, liberals fear whats passed for a democratic transition is coming to closely resemble military tyranny. Thecommentator Omar Warraich, among others, has thoughtfully noted that the real lesson is that the Generals need to be evicted from Pakistani politics. The chokehold of the military on ideas and debate has created a republic of fear.

For Indians, the crisis in Pakistan ought to be a reminder of just how fragile democratic freedoms areand how difficult they can be to resurrect when they have been allowed to crumble.

The author is National Security Editor, ThePrint. He tweets @praveenswami. Views are personal.

(Edited by Humra Laeeq)

View post:
Pakistani Generals have a history of censoring media. Imran Khan is ... - ThePrint

Zapata, Foxconn, Insilico Medicine, and University of Toronto Study … – HPCwire

BOSTON, June 6, 2023 Zapata Computing today announced that it has published research with Insilico Medicine, Foxconn, and the University of Toronto which explores the use of hybrid quantum-classical generative adversarial networks (GAN) for small molecule discovery. Not only could the quantum-enhanced GANs generate small molecules, but these molecules had more desirable properties than those generated by purely classical GANs.

As detailed in the research paper, the teams leveraged artificial intelligence and quantum computing techniques to replace each element of GAN with a variational quantum circuit (VQC). The molecules generated by the quantum-enhanced GANs were then compared with those generated by a purely classical GAN according to three qualitative metrics (validity, uniqueness, and novelty) and three quantitative properties (drug-likeness (QED), solubility, and synthesizability (SA)). Researchers found that the small molecules created through the use of a VQC frequently had better physicochemical properties and performance in the goal-directed benchmark than the classical counterpart.

At Insilico Medicine, were always seeking new ways to transform drug design and development through artificial intelligence to help bring life-saving medications to patients, said Alex Zhavoronkov, PhD, founder and CEO of Insilico Medicine. The drug discovery pipeline is traditionally a long and costly process, but recent advances in machine learning and deep learning technologies have proven to help reduce time and costs for pharmaceutical research and development. By working with Zapata and Foxconn, we were able to uncover molecule designs with viable structures that were comparable to those from classical methods.

We are pleased to achieve this milestone in the collaboration with Insilico Medicine. Quantum computing can be used to solve complex computational problems. The application of quantum computing in drug discovery will potentially help reduce the time and lower the cost of research and development, said Min-Hsiu Hsieh, PhD, Director of the Quantum Computing Research Center of Hon Hai Technology Group, Foxconn.

This work with Insilico Medicine and Foxconn is a great example of how quantum-enhanced generative AI can be used to solve real-word problems more effectively, said Yudong Cao, CTO and co-founder at Zapata Computing. Weve seen encouraging evidence that demonstrates the potential of quantum and quantum-inspired generative models, and were excited to see how these quantum-inspired techniques could help further advance the pharmaceutical industry, as well as other industries looking to overcome complex design challenges.

Zapata has a track record of breakthrough research in quantum generative AI. In 2021, Zapata researchers were the first to generate high-resolution images using quantum generative models. In more recent work with BMW, Zapata researchers demonstrated how quantum-inspired generative models could improve upon best-in-class traditional optimization solutions for a vehicle manufacturing scheduling problem.

For more information about Zapatas research with Insilico Medicine, Foxconn, and the University of Toronto, please click here.

About Zapata Computing

Zapata Computing, Inc. builds solutions to enterprises most computationally complex problems. It has pioneered proprietary methods in generative AI, machine learning, and quantum techniques that run on classical hardware (CPUs, GPUs). Zapatas Orquestra platform supports the development and deployment of better, faster, more cost-effective modelsfor example, Large Language Models, Monte Carlo simulations, and other computationally intense solutions. Zapata was founded in 2017 and is headquartered in Boston, Massachusetts.

Source: Zapata Computing

Excerpt from:
Zapata, Foxconn, Insilico Medicine, and University of Toronto Study ... - HPCwire

The Process of Leaving Jordan Peterson Behind Current Affairs – Current Affairs

I recently had a fascinating conversation with a Current Affairs reader, Benjamin Howard, who was once a major fan of Dr. Jordan B. Peterson, the famous Canadian psychologist and author of the bestselling book 12 Rules For Life. Howard has taken what I suspect is an uncommon intellectual journey. From admiring Peterson and swallowing the professors critique of the woke mind virus, Howard has become so skeptical of Peterson that he is now building a comprehensive website called JordanPetersonIsWrong.com.

I spoke to Howard because I wanted to better understand two things:

Personally, I have little respect for Petersons intellectual contributions. But I dont extend that contempt to his readers and listeners, because I think he offers persuasive narratives to those who feel lost and confused. I have long considered him a charlatan, but I also think you can be a very perceptive and decent person and still be taken in by charlatans. By talking to Benjamin, I wanted to see how Peterson looked not from my perspective (as a left-wing cynic) but from the perspective of someone who had once deeply admired the professors intellect. Ive written out my criticisms of Peterson at voluminous length (they are also available in a book, The Current Affairs Rules For Life). I am long past the point of wanting to rehash them, and Peterson has ducked my attempts to organize a one-on-one debate despite initially agreeing. The question that interests me most now is: Given that I think Petersons apocalyptic black-and-white worldview is incredibly dangerous and delusional, what can be done to de-radicalize his followers and keep them from joining the right-wing mission to eradicate leftism and transgenderism from the world?

Benjamin and I began our conversation by talking about what sets Peterson apart from other anti-woke pundits. Peterson has not just built a following for his critique of political correctness, but for his program of personal self-improvement. His 12 Rules For Life is not really a political book at all (although a couple of its rules have political implications, such as his view that you shouldnt criticize the world until you set your house in perfect order). Instead, Peterson offers his answer to the question What are the most valuable things that everyone should know? He gives a set of maxims ranging from Pursue what is meaningful (not what is expedient (#7) to Pet a cat when you encounter one on the street (#12). Peterson explains that people need ordering principles because chaos otherwise beckons. The rules are his attempt to counter chaos so we can stay on the straight and narrow path.

For Benjamin, the fact that Petersons self-help principles are so prescriptive, and he doesnt offer affirming and uplifting messages, is part of the appeal. Benjamin explained:

Theres certain kinds of self help where it feels like theyre just telling you what you want to hearYou shouldnt feel bad about yourself, this kind of positive thinking. And Peterson was straightforwardly against that. [His take was more like] just, if youre not doing well, you should feel bad about yourself and you should want to improve yourself and if you dont, then somethings wrong with you.

Now, to me, this seems pretty horrible (Im much more of the Mr. Rogers you are special school so hated by the right). But Benjamin says the approach was actually inspiring because Peterson has a way of speaking [where] it feels very deep in his heart that he wants you to do better for yourself. For Benjamin, what may look to other people like obvious and paternalistic advice can feel very useful to certain people at certain points in their life:

Ive heard some critics of Peterson say, well, his self-help is all just obvious. They dont even get why anyone would listen to his self-help or enjoy itHe says clean your room, doesnt everyone know that? But theres a certain point in your life where you dont know that or you do know it, but you dont care about it, or you dont see why you should do itHe gives an explanation of why its important. And you might want to look up his clean your room speech. Its very interestingHe kind of has a habit of making everything feel really profound and super meaningful. Thats part of what makes it motivating. And so if yourelacking in motivation, then someone comes along and sort of slaps you in the face and says, Hey, this is really important, clean your room, then youll actually do it.

Benjamin himself, when he first heard Peterson on the Joe Rogan podcast in 2018, was at a point in his life where this kind of message spoke to him. As he explains:

At the time that I encountered Peterson, I wasnt where I wanted to be in my life. I had graduated high school, and then I didnt go to post secondary immediately after. I was trying to do writing, and I was just working part time at a furniture warehouse. Theres kind of that vacuum after going to high school. In high school, you have all these friends and everythings decided for you. You know exactly what youre doing. Youre being graded, so you know if youre doing it well. And then one year out of high school, its like, what do I do now? At first youre like oh, I have all this freedom. For the first two months or whatever. And then a year goes by and its like Oh, Im still not moved out of my parents house, which I thought I would haveThat waswhere I was at when Jordan Peterson entered. And when youre in that kind of place having someone whos coming along with this very confident, inspiring message of Heres what you need to do to fix your life, thats really valuable. I still dont credit him for helping me to change my life or something. But maybe a little bit.

There are plenty of people who do credit Peterson with changing their lives (just read the YouTube comments sections or the Amazon reviews of his books). Benjamin did get to where he wanted to be in his life, enrolling in college to study computer science, and when his life changed, his interest in listening to Jordan Peterson started to wane, because he no longer felt he needed to hear these tough love messages about getting his act together.

Peterson is not just a self-help guru, though. Hes also a demagogue who pushes reactionary talking points about how transgender people and socialists pose a threat to the social order. Benjamin and I discussed how Peterson combines the how to fix your life message with regular attacks on woke culture. Benjamin concedes that at the time he first encountered Peterson, he enjoyed hearing him going off against political correctness, and thought he had done it in a way that was very unique and intelligent. When Peterson explained the sources of what was wrong in the world, Benjamin describes the listening experience as:

Oh, now I understand. Everything clicks into place. It makes it almost addicting to listen to him. You feel like youre really learning something deep about the whole world, like how everything is really working.

(Incidentally, that feeling of being told the secrets of how everything is really working is part of the source of QAnons appeal, too.)

In trying to explain why Peterson is so compelling, Benjamin points to his confidence, charisma, and his seemingly genius ability to combined eclectic insights into a giant unified theory:

Hes also able to weave in a lot of different topics together, where hes got the self-help, hes got religion, hes got psychology, and then the politicsIf you listen to one of his lectures where hes in this lecture hall talking for an hour, two hours, hell go across all these different topics and weave them, like hes trying to give the impression that theyre all unified together. But its this hodgepodge of different things that maybe arent related. It gives this feeling of Wow, this guy knows about everything, and hes just so knowledgeable, and hes giving this profound insight that other people just dont have. I think there is definitely an impression that youre getting genius insights from this person. I think thats what leads to over-trusting of his information, because if hes a genius, then why look into anything he says? He must just be correct.

I think Benjamin is right about the impression Peterson gives. In my own writing, I dissected some of the tricks Peterson uses to convey the impression that he knows more than he actually does. But what I was really interested in was the question of why Benjamin left Peterson behind. What broke this mans spell?

It wasnt reading Current Affairs. Or at least, that was only part of it. In fact, Benjamin told me that the first time he encountered my article about Peterson, he hated it. He rejected its analysis and thought I was just a hater launching unfair attacks. Other things had to happen before Benjamin would be open to hearing such a sharp critique.

Ive mentioned one of the things that happened, which is that Benjamins life circumstances changed when he went to college. When he was there, he took a couple of courses that opened his mind. First, he took a course on ancient Greek and Roman religion, which he says pushed him toward being an atheist, because he saw how these societies decided things based on religious ideas that seem loopy today. Things were decided just based on What do the gods want to do? I just realized Whoa, they did a lot of crazy stuff back then. Critically analyzing these ancient societies allowed Benjamin to see parallels with our own.

Second, Benjamin took a critical thinking course. (For some reason, we dont mandate critical thinking in schools, but we should!) This taught him to spot outright errors in the thought of the genius psychologist:

I was still very much into Peterson at that time. But I noticed the naturalistic fallacy. Thats something that Peterson actually does very frequently. Or appeal to tradition. And so you notice, Oh, okay, there are some problems here.

But Benjamin says that a crucial eye-opening moment came when he heard Peterson make a remark he just considered totally off the wall and transparently wrong:

I really enjoy art and fiction and music. And Peterson said, without religion, there would be no art, there would be no poetry, and there would be no music, no anything. And I went, Whoa, that is so not true. What about all these atheists? People that made great things. So for me, that was the part that was like, Thats crazy.

Seeing that someone seemingly profound was not right about everything led Benjamin to take a more critical approach to Petersons thinking, at which point a lot of his faith in Petersons genius began to crumble. (The central role of college courses in changing Benjamins thinking helps us explain why the right hates college.) He noticed that Peterson exaggerated and misrepresented the Canadian law that was supposedly going to throw him in jail for misgendering people. He noticed that Peterson was not interested in accurately or fairly representing the postmodern neo-Marxists he criticized. Benjamins disillusionment started slowly, and then happened all at once. It was only then that he re-read my article in Current Affairs and found himself agreeing with a lot of the criticisms I made. I hadnt persuaded Benjamin, but I did confirm a lot of what he had started to figure out on his own. Now, as I say, Benjamin is so critical of Peterson that hes building a whole website laying out the flaws in Petersons thought. I think this is a valuable project, because there are a lot of people who remain fans of Peterson and have yet to undergo the process of disillusionment that Benjamin has been through. I hope he can help them.

There are a few interesting insights to be found in Benjamins story, if were thinking about how to keep people from turning toward hateful reactionary thinking. First, and Ive said this before, we need to have faith in peoples ability to change their minds. I find Peterson repellent, but I dont find it helpful to call his listeners fascists or even transphobes. Many are young men like Benjamin who are simply in a tough place in their lives and susceptible to the messages of charismatic figures who promise to explain the world, identify your enemies, and help you fix your life. (Thats not to say that Peterson himself is not transphobic; he is, and its extreme, toxic, and frightening.)

We can also see that even though people can change their minds, the process takes time. It doesnt happen because someone presents you with a set of arguments that own and destroy a certain position. Changes in our thinking come from experience, not just pure reason. My article on Jordan Peterson did not snap Benjamin out of his fandom. He had to figure things out bit by bit, with different bricks slotting into place. Studying ancient societies made him critical of religion. Studying critical thinking gave him the tools to see when Peterson was wrong. And so when Peterson defended religion using arguments Benjamin knew didnt make sense, the genius suddenly seemed a bit, well, stupid.

I was encouraged by my conversation with Benjamin. As we see reactionary politics getting more and more aggressive in this country, with would-be dictators like Ron DeSantis clamoring for power and legislatures around the country embracing anti-LGBT legislation, we need more urgently than ever to figure out how we can talk to people and keep right-wing movements from attracting new followers. It can be done. Its not easy, and its not just a matter of handing people copies of Responding to the Right and buying them subscriptions to Current Affairs (although you should of course do both). Sometimes, peoples lives have to change in order for their minds to open, and you cant really affect that. We can, perhaps, give them the kind of inspiration they are looking for in dark times, so that they will be less in need of the messages someone like Peterson offers. We can perhaps show them that while having a clean room is nice, a lot of our problems must be addressed through collective political action. But first and foremost, we have to have some empathy and patience. I have confidence that there are many people out there like Benjamin who can eventually come to see through the lies and misdirection of demagogues and join the project of building a better world for all.

Help us to help more people see through Jordan Petersons deranged ideology by donating to Current Affairs and subscribing to our beautiful print magazine.

Excerpt from:
The Process of Leaving Jordan Peterson Behind Current Affairs - Current Affairs

Elon Musk and Jordan Peterson Are Being Transphobic Online Again – The Mary Sue

Sometimes I wonder what its like to be a blissfully ignorant white man, unaware of the limitations of his own capabilities, but then I look at said type of idiot and I realize that those idiots are the worst. Which brings me to todays topic: Elon Musk and Jordan Peterson (who, as far as I can tell, has made a name for himself as having the thinnest skin possible, and then crying about it, literally) are on Twitter calling for anyone who provides trans kids with gender-affirming care to go to prison. Hey everyone! The mediocre white men are here to tell us all how to live, so gather round and listen to what they have to say. Or dontI recommend you dont because theyre hateful morons, but Im going to tell you about the s*it they were spewing anyway:

OK, so first and foremost, Musk and Peterson are deeply stupid in the worst way. Its clear they think they are thought leaders and very erudite (Elon, Jordan: if youre reading this and we know you are because you most definitely have Google Alerts set for your name, erudite means having or showing knowledge that is gained by studying.) From the way that Musk worded his bestest boy in the world proclamation, the braces I got as a child would be illegal under his fantasy billionaire rule because guess what? Those braces made irreversible changes to me that were deemed medically necessary by my dentist (I had to get bottom teeth pulled to fit my jaw, and those suckers are long gone.) However, we all know thats not what theyre talking about. They just want to be cruel bullies for no reason because it gets them the attention they so desperately crave. And, just as importantly, gender-affirming care for children doesnt impact them at all, so they can have nasty opinions on it and it doesnt affect them.

Like the sad weirdo who said something mildly funny in class, Musk got a laugh and then decided to double down on it by responding to hate accounts and agreeing with their stanceslike this random BS, where he agrees that Pride month needs to be about LGB and take out the TQ+.

Any asshole can create a Twitter account and talk shit online. This is the internet; there is a high likelihood that youll be able find hateful people who agree with your ignorant opinions. Its incredibly depressing. Remember, Musk is a man so desperate for approval and attention that he created a burner account and kept begging for more followers. There is something wrong with him, but unfortunately, his mega-wealth shields him from consequences and gives him an international platform to continuously punch down on other people. In this case, thats anyone who actually cares about the well-being of trans kids.

Naturally, when the manbaby tyrant who bought his way into Twitter and the crybaby who got kicked off the platform for deadnaming Elliot Page (until Musk let him back into the clubhouse) decide to talk about things they know nothing about, other people notice and are there to call them out on their terrible, harmful takes:

This is exhausting. Neither Elon Musk or Jordan Peterson have a medical degree. (Peterson has a PhD in Clinical Psychology, which is a liberal arts degree. Its also fun to note, because Im sure it bruises his ego, that he is not listed as a notable alumnus from McGill University where he got his BA and PhD. You suck, Peterson! Everyone knows it but you!) These two are just assholes with cruel opinions.

First and foremost, what constitutes a necessary medical treatment is between a patient and their doctor. We all know that conservatives are desperate to insert themselves into that equation, and unfortunately, they have been relatively successful so far. This is not about saving the children because if it actually were, they would want to make sure no child ever goes hungry and would be lobbying Congress to reinstate the monthly Child Tax Credit. Which, of course, they are not. Conservatives just want to terrorize children and anyone who cares enough about them to give them the care they need. Calling for the imprisonment of anyone who actually provides care to children is much easier than reading a peer-reviewed medical study. Its also extremely fascist.

If youre looking for actual statistics on gender-affirming care for children, journalist Erin Reed from the Tweet above breaks it down for you, per Erin in the Morning:

Gender affirming care for transgender youth is lifesaving and has proven to lower their suicide rates by 73% according toa landmark study in 2022published in the Journal of the American Medical Association. There are several other studies that have found similar positive impacts of gender affirming care, such asa studyin the Journal of Adolescent Health showing a reduction of 40% over the last year. A recentreport published by the Louisiana Department of Healthstudying Louisiana Medicaid recipients stated that regret rates for gender affirming care were less than 1% and that the care significantly improved the mental health and suicidality of trans youth. The science is so overwhelmingly in favor of gender affirming care that theUniversity of Cornell publisheda listing of over 50 articles that prove the positive impact of this care.

Predictably, neither Musk nor Peterson can justify their stance with a reason other than they simply dont like it, and I guess no one taught them to mind their own business?! These two are bullies with a pulpit, and their opinions are horrible and harmful. But when has that ever stopped them, or anyone like them? To summarize: Musk and Peterson remain awful, and gender-affirming care for trans kids saves lives.

(featured image: Michael Gonzalez, Getty Images)

Have a tip we should know? [emailprotected]

See more here:
Elon Musk and Jordan Peterson Are Being Transphobic Online Again - The Mary Sue