Archive for April, 2022

3 Democrats seeking to be CT treasurer begin a sprint to the convention – The Connecticut Mirror

Erick A. Russell, the vice chair of the state Democratic Party, opened his race for state treasurer Thursday with endorsements calculated to create a sense of momentum in what is now at least a three-way sprint to the state convention on May 6.

Exactly one week after Treasurer Shawn T. Wooden stunned Democrats by opting against a reelection campaign, the party has a field of three: Dita Bhargava of Greenwich, Karen Dubois-Walton of New Haven, and Russell, also of New Haven.

Bhargava, a former Wall Street trader, lost to Wooden in the Democratic primary for treasurer in 2018. Dubois-Walton challenged New Haven Mayor Justin Elicker last year, only to drop out before a Democratic primary.

Russells kickoff came withendorsements: Nancy Wyman, the former lieutenant governor and party chair; House Speaker Matt Ritter of Hartford; Comptroller Natalie Braswell; and Arunan Arulampalam of Hartford, a candidate for the office four years ago.

The competition between Dubois-Walton and Russell, two Black candidates from New Haven, will complicate the role of urban power brokers, especially that of Vinnie Mauro, the long-time New Haven Democratic chair and top aide to Senate President Pro Tem Martin M. Looney.

Mauro had already decided to back Dubois-Walton, who created a campaign committee Wednesday. Mauro said Dubois-Walton and Russell, who is a bond lawyer with Pullman & Comley, are both well-qualified and will be good candidates.

Erick and I are personal friends. This is not easy, said Mauro, who often watches football games with Russell and former state Rep. Chris Lyddy, who is Russells husband. His only fault is that hes a Cowboys fan.

In a year when Democrats are worried about an enthusiasm gap at the polls, Mauro sees Dubois-Walton as capable of energizing African-American women, an important Democratic constituency.

He called her charismatic and, as the chief executive of the New Haven Housing Authority, attuned to the social impacts of investment decisions.

Identity politics have been attached to the Democratic nomination for treasurer since 1962, when Gerald A. Lamb was nominated for treasurer and elected as the first Black statewide officeholder. He served two terms.

In the 60 years since, every Democratic nominee for treasurer has been a Black man or woman. The reason has been a commitment to a racially diverse ticket and the simple mechanics of politics.

Lamb was succeeded by a Republican in 1970. Henry E. Parker, a Black Democrat from New Haven, was elected in 1974 to the first of three terms. When he did not run in 1986, the office of treasurer was the only open seat.

If the Democrats wanted a Black candidate on the ticket, treasurer was the only office availablewithout denying an incumbent re-nomination. Francisco L. Borges, a Black Democrat from Hartford, won the first of his two terms in 1986.

A pattern was set.

Connecticut offers candidates a two-track path to party nominations: direct primaries that are hallmarks of modern politics, and the inside game of winning the endorsement of state nominating conventions.

Four years ago, Bob Stefanowski sidestepped the convention process and petitioned for a spot on the Republican gubernatorial primary, which he won a first for either party.

More conventional is seeking the endorsement of the nominating convention. Anyone winning 15% of the convention vote on any one ballot automatically qualifies for a primary.

With a short runway to the convention, the support of insiders who can broker delegate support is likely to be crucial. There also is an open race for the Democratic nomination for secretary of the state, with a diverse, large and potentially growing field.

Read the original post:
3 Democrats seeking to be CT treasurer begin a sprint to the convention - The Connecticut Mirror

Politics at the pump: Illinois Democrats election-year plan to pause gas tax hike sparks backlash from station owners – Yahoo News

CHICAGO By Fourth of July, Illinois drivers likely will be greeted at the gas pump by 4-by-8-inch signs informing them that as they fill their tanks, theyre actually saving money, courtesy of their elected leaders in Springfield.

Legislation pushed through in the closing hours of the General Assemblys truncated spring session this month freezes a scheduled hike in the states gas tax for six months. The measure, now awaiting Gov. J.B. Pritzkers signature, includes a stipulation that every gas station in the state post a notice informing drivers about the gas tax freeze.

That requirement, laid out in a single paragraph in the Democrats 923-page election-year tax relief plan, has gas station owners grumbling and Republicans howling. Democrats have responded by calling their GOP colleagues hypocrites because their party pushed a similar election-year proposal two decades ago.

The fact that the law requires gas stations to pay for the signs or be fined and that the placards be in place when the hike would have taken effect on July 1, as the state budget year begins and just days after the June 28 primary, has emboldened critics to say the effort is little more than the latest example of old-school, gas-pump politics.

But Democrats, who correctly note that while Republicans complained they nevertheless voted for the measure, are defending the sign requirement.

In addition to the gas-tax freeze, the $1.8 billion package approved by lawmakers in the early morning hours April 9 also includes a one-year suspension of the 1% sales tax on groceries, direct payments to taxpayers and a property tax rebate.

Democratic lawmakers say the package is a sharing of the wealth with residents who are struggling with record inflation as the state enjoys its strongest financial performance in decades.

We want our citizens to know that Illinois government is on the mend, were in the best fiscal health in a generation, and weve done this for them, sponsoring state Rep. Mike Zalewski, a Riverside Democrat, said when the plan was debated on the House floor in the middle of the night on the final day of the legislative session.

Story continues

Still, none of the Democratic leaders who negotiated the proposal neither Pritzker, House Speaker Emanuel Chris Welch of Hillside nor Senate President Don Harmon of Oak Park would claim credit for the gas pump sticker requirement that was included in the final package.

The state gas tax, currently 39.2 cents per gallon, is set to increase by 2.4 cents on July 1, according to the state Department of Revenue. But with Pritzkers signature, that bump will be pushed off until Jan. 1, with the exact amount to be determined by where inflation stands at the end of September. Drivers will be hit with another increase on July 1, 2023.

Consumers across the state need to realize: The states going to get their money, said Josh Sharp, CEO of the Illinois Fuel and Retail Association. Theyre not putting this off indefinitely or forever. Theyre just putting it off until after an election.

The association, which represents gas station owners, has threatened to file a lawsuit over the sticker requirement, arguing that it violates businesses free-speech rights.

Our members just do not like being told that they have to engage in and participate in speech that they dont want to have anything to do with, Sharp said. The state of Illinois doesnt get to tell our members what they have to say at the pump. Thats not their job, and doing so, we feel, is unconstitutional.

Once the measure becomes law, gas stations who fail to post the notice would be subject to a fine of $500 per day.

Sharp and other critics note that Pritzker and the Democratic-controlled legislature didnt require service stations to post a notice at the pump when they doubled the gas tax to 38 cents per gallon in 2019 and tied future increases to the rate of inflation. The extra revenue is being used to fund road and bridge upgrades through Pritzkers $45 billion Rebuild Illinois infrastructure program another theme voters will be hearing a lot about this year.

Gas station owners arent the only ones griping.

Republican lawmakers, who voted for the plan stickers and all to avoid going on the record against tax breaks, say the savings will be paltry. A driver who fills up a 15-gallon tank each week, for example, would save less than $10 over six months.

Whats more, they argue the mandate for gas stations to post the notice smacks of electioneering.

That sounds like something that somebody would do that pushes the line on campaign ethics, retiring GOP Rep. Mark Batinick of Plainfield said during the House debate.

Republicans already are making it a campaign issue, with both the state GOP and one of the partys governor candidates referencing the stickers in fundraising emails in recent days.

The Democrats response? We got the idea from your side of the aisle.

In 2000, Republican Gov. George Ryan called lawmakers back to Springfield to address skyrocketing gas prices. Along with GOP Senate President James Pate Philip of Wood Dale, Ryan pushed a plan to suspend the state sales tax on gasoline, then 5%, for six months.

At the time, gas in the Chicago area was averaging above $2 per gallon more than $3.30 per gallon in todays dollars, still well below the average of nearly $4.46 cents per gallon as of Wednesday.

While 2000 wasnt a year for statewide elections, it was a presidential election year and the GOP-backed plan required gas stations to place a sign on their pumps informing those at the pump about the tax freeze. It was sold as a way to make sure the temporary tax savings, estimated at about 10 cents per gallon, was passed along to consumers rather than pocketed by businesses.

The GOP proposal, which like this years plan was approved on overwhelming bipartisan votes in the House and Senate, was characterized by one of its few opponents, Chicago Democrat and then-House Majority Leader Barbara Flynn Currie, as the incumbent reelection plan of the year 2000.

I would urge you all to take a careful look at the policy, not the political implications, Currie said before the House voted to approve the plan on a 106-5 vote.

The handful of Democrats who opposed the plan included then-House Speaker Michael Madigan and then-Rep. Sara Feigenholtz, a Chicago Democrat who now serves in the Senate and voted in favor of this years plan. They raised concerns that it would put a strain on other areas of the state budget. A spokeswoman for Feigenholtz did not respond to a request for comment.

Earlier in the week, a Pritzker spokeswoman said it was Republicans, not Democrats, who are playing politics with the price at the pump.

Alongside Democrats in the General Assembly, we will continue to put working families first, no matter how much Republicans want to manufacture phony political complaints, Pritzker spokeswoman Emily Bittner said in a statement. Informing people of the gas tax relief mirrors the same exact effort that Republicans made in 2000.

Two decades ago, a lobbyist for the industry hailed the move to freeze the sales tax on gas as the greatest thing since canned beer and didnt oppose placing the stickers at the pump. In fact, when the tax holiday ended at the start of 2001, the trade group sent out its own stickers to members, pointing the finger at Springfield for the price increase.

This time around, station owners supported a stalled Republican proposal to permanently cap the 6.25% sales tax on gas a separate charge levied in addition to the gas tax at 18 cents per gallon.

The industry also argues that its being treated differently than other businesses whose customers will enjoy tax breaks as a result of the Democrats plan.

Supermarkets will be required, to the extent feasible, to print a notice on their receipts that the 1% sales tax on groceries has been waived for one year. If it cant be printed on the receipt, then the retailer shall post the statement on a sign that is clearly visible to customers.

But unlike gas stations, grocery stores wont face a fine if they fail to comply.

The disparate treatment of different retailers is all about politics, said Sharp, of the Illinois Fuel and Retail Association.

I think that theres several legislators and constitutional officers that are very scared of wearing the jacket heading into the election season for high gas prices, Sharp said. And they should be scared. Theyre the ones that doubled the gas tax just in 2019.

See the original post here:
Politics at the pump: Illinois Democrats election-year plan to pause gas tax hike sparks backlash from station owners - Yahoo News

Here are the candidates in Warren Countys June 7 primary election – lehighvalleylive.com

Four Warren County municipalities have contested races in New Jerseys 2022 primary election, according to the countys candidates list released last week.

In addition, one county-level race is contested with two Republican candidates vying for the nomination for sheriff.

Republican and Democratic voters go to the polls, or can vote by mail-in ballot, in the primary set for June 7 to lock in candidates for the Nov. 8 general election.

Some deadlines for voters to keep in mind are:

May 17: Voter registration deadline for primary election (21 days before election).

May 31: Deadline to apply for a mail-in ballot by mail for primary election (not less than 7 days prior to election).

June 3: Deadline for application to receive primary election mail-in ballots by electronic means for qualified overseas civilian and military voters (4th day before election).

June 6 (by 3 p.m.): Deadline for in-person mail-in ballot applications for primary election (up to 3 p.m. on the day before election).

June 7: Deadline for post office receipt of mail-in ballots from the primary election.

June 7: Deadline for in-person submission of primary election mail-in ballots to county boards of election (by 8 p.m. on the day of election).

In the contested primary races, according to the countys list:

For Warren County sheriff, incumbent James McDonald Sr. faces a Republican primary challenge from Todd Pantuso. No Democrats filed petitions to seek the office.

In Belvidere, three Republicans are vying for two nominations for Belvidere Town Council, with Frank Tootle challenging incumbents Glen Matlock and Don Mitchell. No Democrats filed.

In Blairstown Township, Republicans G. Eric Lohman and Karen Lance are vying for one nomination to succeed Committeewoman Giovanna Joanne Van Valkenburg, whose term expires at the end of this year. No Democrats filed.

In Hackettstown, vying for two Republican nominations for town council are incumbents Matt Engelau and Jim Lambo, plus challenger Gus Bordi. No Democrats filed.

Washington Borough has two contested races on the Republican side. Dale Parichuk and Councilman DeWayne Keith Norris are seeking the nomination to run against Democrat Ethel Conry, who is deputy mayor, for the vacant office of the mayor. For council, four seats are open with six Republicans seeking nominations: Joseph Kresefsky, Yael Kresefsky, Cassandra Gorshkov, Edward France, Sherri Musick and Jerry Brown; the Democratic primary is uncontested with incumbents Josephine Noone and Sonia Ron on the ballot along with Chris Bauknight and Scott McDonald.

Following is a table listing all of the Warren County candidates for municipal office in the 2022 primary election, according to the county elections office. Click here to view it, since it may not display on all platforms, or to view it fullscreen.

Our journalism needs your support. Please subscribe today to lehighvalleylive.com.

Kurt Bresswein may be reached at kbresswein@lehighvalleylive.com.

Read the original:
Here are the candidates in Warren Countys June 7 primary election - lehighvalleylive.com

Durham: Five Witnesses Connected to the Clinton Campaigns False Russian Claims Have Refused to Cooperate Under the Fifth Amendment – Jonathan Turley

Special Counsel John Durham continues to drop bombshells in filings in the prosecution of former Clinton campaign lawyer Michael Sussmann. Just last week, Durham defeated an effort by Sussmann to dismiss the charges. He is now moving to give immunity to a key witness while revealing that the claims made by the Clinton campaign were viewed by the CIA as not technically plausible and user created. He also revealed that at least five of the former Clinton campaign contractors/researchers have invoked the Fifth Amendment and refused to cooperate in fear that they might incriminate themselves in criminal conduct. Finally, Durham offers further details on the involvement of Clinton campaign general counsel Marc Elias and former British spy Christopher Steele in the alleged false claims.

The only witness currently immunized by the government, Researcher-2, was conferred with that status on July 28, 2021 over a month prior to the defendants Indictment in this matter. And the Government immunized Researcher-2 because, among other reasons, at least five other witnesses who conducted work relating to the Russian Bank-1 allegations invoked (or indicated their intent to invoke) their right against self-incrimination. The Government therefore pursued Researcher-2s immunity in order to uncover otherwise-unavailable facts underlying the opposition research project that Tech Executive-1 and others carried out in advance of the defendants meeting with the FBI.

Durham also detailed how the false Russian collusion claims related to Alfa Bank involved Clinton General Counsel Marc Elias and Christopher Steele. Indeed, the new requested immunized testimony would come from a Tech executive who allegedly can share information on meetings with Elias and Steele.

Durham notes that both the CIA and FBI were sent on an effective wild goose chase by the Clinton campaign. He notes that the government found the allegations to be manufactured and not even technically possible. He refers to the CIA in the following passage:

Agency-2 concluded in early 2017 that the Russian Bank-1 data and Russian Phone Provider-1 data was not technically plausible, did not withstand technical scrutiny, contained gaps, conflicted with [itself], and was user created and not machine/tool generated.

This dovetails with the statements of the Clinton associates themselves who were worried about the lack of support for the Russian collusion claims. Researcher 1 features prominently in those exchanges.

According to Durham, the Alfa Bank allegation fell apart even before Sussmann delivered it to the FBI. The indictment details how an unnamed tech executive allegedly used his authority at multiple internet companies to help develop the ridiculous claim. (The executive reportedly later claimed that he was promised a top cyber security job in the Clinton administration). Notably, there were many who expressed misgivings not only within the companies working on the secret project but also among unnamed university researchers who repeatedly said the argument was bogus.

The researchers were told they should not be looking for proof but just enough to give the base of a very useful narrative. The researchers argued, according to the indictment, that anyone familiar with analyzing internet traffic would poke several holes in that narrative, noting that what they saw likely was not a secret communications channel with Russian Bank-1, but a red herring, according to the indictment.

Researcher-1 repeated these doubts, the indictment says, and asked, How do we plan to defend against the criticism that this is not spoofed traffic we are observing? There is no answer to that. Lets assume again that they are not smart enough to refute our best case scenario. You do realize that we will have to expose every trick we have in our bag to even make a very weak association.

Researcher-1 allegedly further warned, We cannot technically make any claims that would fly public scrutiny. The only thing that drives us at this point is that we just do not like [Trump]. This will not fly in eyes of public scrutiny. Folks, I am afraid we have tunnel vision. Time to regroup?

It appears that the time to regroup has passed with the issuance of immunity deals to compel testimony.

Here is the filing:

US-v-Sussmann-04162022-US-Filing

Like Loading...

Visit link:
Durham: Five Witnesses Connected to the Clinton Campaigns False Russian Claims Have Refused to Cooperate Under the Fifth Amendment - Jonathan Turley

Feds go to court in Portland to collect $2.8M fine against HobbyKing for marketing unauthorized drone transmi – OregonLive

The U.S. government Thursday filed a civil action in federal court in Portland against drone distributor HobbyKing to collect a $2.8 million fine for selling and marketing unauthorized communication devices for drones.

The Federal Communications Commission determined that HobbyKing marketed to U.S. customers at least 65 models of audio visual transmitters that were not certified by the federal agency and would not have a legitimate amateur radio use.

The certification requirement ensures that radio frequency equipment does not interfere with federal government operations, such as the Federal Aviation Administrations aeronautical radar systems. Fifteen of the 65 models created a threat to public safety, according to the civil complaint.

The federal regulatory commission also found that the drone transmitters were marketed to drone enthusiasts and not to licensed radio amateurs.

The Federal Communications Commission sent the company a letter on Nov. 1, seeking full payment of the fine within 30 days, according to the complaint. The amount remains unpaid, the complaint said.

The government is seeking $2.8 million for HobbyKings violations and $39,278 for the companys failure to respond to the commissioners orders, plus interest.

The company has argued to federal regulators that there are no marketing rules that specifically address versatile drone equipment capable of both amateur and non-amateur frequencies and that it had no notice that its marketing was unlawful.

The company also argued that responding to the agency would violate its Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination and the amount of the fine should be reduced due to the companys inability to pay, according to court records.

The Federal Communications Commission rejected the companys arguments, saying its rules prohibit the marketing of radio frequency devices unless the devices have first been labeled and authorized consistent with the commissions rules.

HobbyKing is the trade name of several companies based in the U.S., including ABC Fulfillment Services and Indubitably, Inc., as well as a Hong Kong-based company, Hextronik. All of the companies are associated with a man named Anthony Hand.

The complaint is filed in Oregon because Indubitably, Inc.s principal place of business is Portland and the companies engaged in business in Oregon, according to the complaint.

-- Maxine Bernstein

Email mbernstein@oregonian.com; 503-221-8212

Follow on Twitter @maxoregonian

Read this article:
Feds go to court in Portland to collect $2.8M fine against HobbyKing for marketing unauthorized drone transmi - OregonLive