Archive for March, 2022

Opinion | What Is Our Moral Obligation in Ukraine? – The New York Times

In June 1998, Clinton declared a national emergency under the pretense that the governments of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia and the Republic of Serbia, with respect to Kosovo, were threatening to destabilize countries of the region and to disrupt progress in Bosnia and Herzegovina in implementing the Dayton peace agreement, and therefore constitute an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States.

NATO intervened, ended the war and brought an end to most of the immediate suffering.

This poses the question: When does America have a moral obligation to intervene particularly for humanitarian reasons in conflict? And which factors contribute to the choices we make?

America and NATO have a clear geopolitical interest in Ukraine: President Vladimir Putin of Russia cannot be allowed to get away with such unprovoked, naked aggression. What kind of precedent would that set? And whos to say that he would stop there?

But when the Ukrainian president, Volodymyr Zelensky, spoke via video to Congress on Wednesday, part of the appeal he was making was a moral one, an appeal to the American belief in and commitment to the very idea of democracy.

He said:

Peace in your country does not depend anymore only on you and your people. It depends on those next to you, on those who are strong. Strong does not mean big. Strong is brave and ready to fight for the life of his citizens and citizens of the world. For human rights, for freedom, for the right to live decently and to die when your time comes, not when it is wanted by someone else, by your neighbor. Today the Ukrainian people are defending not only Ukraine, we are fighting for the values of Europe and the world, sacrificing our lives in the name of the future.

The question is how far is America compelled to go. President Biden signed off on $13.6 billion in aid on Tuesday and announced on Wednesday that $800 million in military assistance would be sent to Ukraine as part of that funding. These are not trivial amounts. Furthermore, America and its allies have imposed stiff economic sanctions on Russia. The sanctions could contribute to inflation, which means that Americans may pay even more than what the administration is pledging in direct assistance.

I say that the United States must supply military aid and should supply humanitarian aid. But I also say that we must be more consistent in determining who deserves outpourings of our humanitarian impulses.

Human suffering is human suffering. It has been a constant in the story of mankind. Sometimes it overlaps with our national interests, and sometimes it does not. But our sense of morality must remain constant, and in it we must find a place for equity.

See the rest here:
Opinion | What Is Our Moral Obligation in Ukraine? - The New York Times

Kyle Rittenhouse Gas Meme of Him Crying at the Pump Viewed Over 1M Times – Newsweek

Kyle Rittenhouse has shared a meme which uses the moment he started crying during his murder trial to poke fun at rising gas prices.

Rittenhouse, who was cleared of two counts of murder following the highly divisive trial in November 2021, shared the clip on his Twitter account on Thursday, where it has since been reshared more than 4,300 times.

The edited video shows Rittenhouse filling up a car at a gas station while in tears.

The clip superimposes Rittenhouse's body from when he was hyperventilating while describing to the jury the circumstances that led up to him shooting Joseph Rosenbaum during the Black Lives Matter protests in Kenosha, Wisconsin, in August 2020.

"No, it's not Lemon Heads.. it's the burning hole in my pocket thanks to a Joe Biden presidency," Rittenhouse tweeted while sharing the clip.

Rittenhouse then credits the creation of the "funny video" to Twitter user @derfanzor.

The "Lemon Heads" remark is a reference to criticism he received from NBA star LeBron James during the trial as the basketball legend appeared to suggest the 19-year-old was not remorseful for his actions.

As footage of Rittenhouse crying in the court went viral on social media in November 2021, James tweeted: "What tears????? I didn't see one. Man knock it off! That boy ate some lemon heads before walking into court."

The meme shared by Rittenhouse has since been viewed more than 600,000 times.

The clip was also posted onto Twitter by Ron Filipkowski, the Republican attorney who resigned from a Florida state commission in protest at a police raid at the home of data scientist Rebekah Jones in December 2020, where it has been viewed further 660,000 times.

A number of people took to Twitter to criticize Rittenhouse for using the moment he cried during his trial while telling the jury why he shot someone to make a joke.

USA Today columnist Rex Huppke described the 19-year-old as an "absolute sociopath." Blogger and author Kimberley Johnson said Rittenhouse was a "product of the American justice system."

Actor John Fugelsang wrote: "Remember when George Zimmerman tried to cash in on his murder of an unarmed American?"

Rittenhouse was acquitted of all charges against him after arguing that he was acting in self defense when he shot and killed Rosenbaum, 36, and Anthony Huber, 26, and wounded 27-year-old Gaige Grosskreutz during the disorder in Kenosha, Wisconsin.

Following his acquittal, Rittenhouse has appeared on a number of right-wing news channels and podcasts, met former president Donald Trump at his Mar-a-Lago resort, and walked on stage to his own theme tune at the Turning Point USA conference in Phoenix in December 2021.

Rittenhouse also set up a donation fund, the "Media Accountability Project," to raise money in order to sue people for defamation over their comments about him before and after the trial.

See the original post:
Kyle Rittenhouse Gas Meme of Him Crying at the Pump Viewed Over 1M Times - Newsweek

The Birth of Illegal Immigration – HISTORY

Until the late 19th century, there wasnt any such thing as illegal or legal immigration to the United States. Thats because before you can immigrate somewhere illegally, there has to be a law for you to break.

American immigration didnt really begin until the late 1700s, when the United States became an independent nation. Before that, Africans had unwillingly entered the Americas as enslaved peoples and Europeans had entered as settlerswhich is something totally different. While immigrants are beholden to the laws of the land they migrate to, settlers come to disrupt the current system and implement their own laws, write the scholars Eve Tuck and K. Wayne Yang.

But once the U.S. made its Constitution the new law of the land, immigrants flocked to the country with few restrictions. This didnt mean that they were welcomed in the New World. In the beginning, when immigrants came mostly from northern and western Europe, anti-Irish and anti-Catholic sentiment were rampant. By the mid- to late-19th century, people from southern and eastern Europe as well as China were coming over, and Americans resented the presence of Chinese, Italians, and more Catholics.

The walls of a holding area in the Angel Island Immigration Station feature inscriptions from immigrants who were detained there. Due to prolonged questioning, some immigrants were detained for months, or even years.

Although some states like California passed local immigration laws during this time, these laws either werent well enforced or were thrown out by courts, says Madeline Y. Hsu, a professor of history at the University of Texas at Austin. In fact, there were no federal laws governing who could enter and who couldnt until the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882.

At the time, Chinese people worked in gold mines, factories, railroads, and agriculture, especially on the West Coast. Although these immigrants made up only .002 percent of the U.S. population, white Americans blamed them for low wages and other economic problems. To placate economic and racial anxieties, the radical exclusion act banned almost all immigration from China, making only a few exceptions for special groups like students and diplomats. In addition, the Immigration Act passed that same year banned people who were poor, mentally ill, or convicted of crimes from entering the country.

Because only a very narrow group of Chinese people could legally immigrate, the acting presumption was that if youre Chinese you must have come in illegally, Hsu says. Chinese become the only group required to carry around certificates of residence, which are intended to showto documentthat they have in fact entered legally. In 1917, the Asiatic Barred Zone Act banned most immigration from Asia, as well as immigration by prostitutes, polygamists, anarchists, and people with contagious diseases.

Asian exclusion continued with the 1924 Immigration Act, which banned all people who could not become naturalized citizens per the 1790 Naturalization Act. That naturalization law had originally said that only free white people could become naturalized citizens. Yet by 1924, previously excluded groups like Mexicans, black Americans, and Native Americans had won citizenship rights, and the law really only applied to Asians.

Scroll to Continue

But the biggest change the 1924 act made to immigration policy was introducing numerical caps or quotas based on country of origin. These quotas gave enormous preference to people from northern and western Europe over those from southern and eastern parts of the continent. Turns out, the previous restrictions on Asian immigrants had made very little impact on the growing levels of immigration to the United States, Hsu says, because the vast majority of immigrants came from Europe. These new quotas were meant to address a sense of crisis that America was accepting too many immigrants, particularly too many non-Anglo Saxon ones.

The 1924 act resurfaced in the news in September 2017 when United States Attorney General Jeff Sessions announced that the U.S. would end DACA (Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals), a policy to give people who came to the U.S. as undocumented children a legal avenue to stay. Sessions had earlier stated that the 1924 Immigration Act was good for America.

But according to Mae M. Ngai, a professor of Asian American studies and history at Columbia University, the 1924 act is considered almost universally to be a stain on our history.

Its an obviously racist act, she says. It ranked people from all over the world on a kind of hierarchy of desirability based on their race and national origin There is no controversy over that.

Ellis Islands Great Hall

The 1924 quota system remained largely in place until the 1960s, when a new law established a new system. Each year, there is a cap on the total number of visas that the U.S. can issue. According to U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, the U.S. cannot issue more than seven percent of the total allowable visas to one nation.

Before this change in 1965, there had been no numeric caps on immigration within the Americas. So when the U.S. decided that it would only take a certain percentage of people from each nation per year, it was the first time the U.S. had put an official cap on Mexican immigration.

Prior to this, Mexican immigrants freely, and commonly, found work in the United States. Yet after the Hart-Celler Immigration Act was passed, Whole groups of migrants from Mexico and Latin America whose entrance to the U.S. would have been considered legal before 1965 suddenly became illegal, writesJane Hong, a history professor at Occidental College, in The L.A. Times.

Theres a lot of talk about the DACA students and [accusations] that its an unlawful program, Hsu says.The problem with that is that you can always change laws, she continues. Laws are constantly changed in order to accommodate actual circumstances.

For example, it is a fact that Mexicans have already been immigrating to and living in the U.S. for a very long time. Whether lawmakers choose to consider that reality is another story.

Originally posted here:
The Birth of Illegal Immigration - HISTORY

Exclusive — Lou Barletta: Illegal Immigration ‘Ends When …

Former congressman and leading Republican gubernatorial candidate Lou Barletta (R-PA) told Breitbart News Saturday that as governor, he will use all powers available to him to stop illegal immigration, noting that many in the GOP do not have the backbone to stand against the radical lefts illegal immigration policies.

Recent polls show the Republican primary race as very much a two-man battle between himself and State Sen. Doug Mastriano. But with Democrat Gov. Tom Wolf (D) leaving office, Republicans have a clear chance to flip the governors mansion. Recent polls, Barletta said, are a reflection on what were seeing on the ground, as he has a huge grassroots campaign.

People know who I am, he said, noting that they can look at his record. Many remember the actions he took as the mayor of Hazleton, where he was essentially the first mayor to stand up and fight against illegal immigration, and he believes that is the kind of fighter they are looking for again.

We see so many politicians making campaign promises, and they get in and become part of the problem and disappoint people, Barletta said. They want a fighter. They saw me on the national stage as a mayor of a small town and do something that nobody else in the country had the courage to do, and I really do believe thats part of why were in front.

As mayor, he prioritized fighting sanctuary city policies and the drugs pouring into his city.

I didnt talk about it. I actually did something about it, he said, noting that he was elected in 2000 and watched as the town was overcome by illegal immigrants.

Our population grew by 50 percent, but our tax revenue stayed the same, he said, describing gangs moving in and recruiting children. Emergency times also increased as illegal aliens used emergency rooms as primary health care. Barletta, at the time, asked for help as violent crime went up.

YURI CORTEZ/AFP/Getty Images

I couldnt find an elected official anywhere in Pennsylvania, he said, ultimately going to Washington, DC, and meeting with the Department of Justice in 2005. He begged them for help but realized no one there was going to help, either. Ultimately, Barletta took matters into his own hands and moved to suspend the license of any business that knowingly hired an illegal alien because it is illegal to hire unlawful workers. He added, I would also suspend the license of any landlord who knowingly harbored or rented to illegal aliens.

As a result, illegals represented by ACLU sued him, and he fought it to the Supreme Court. But many cities across the country followed what he did in Hazleton, and he battled for it in Congress as well.

LISTEN:

Unfortunately for us, I found out that even on our own side, people dont like to talk about it, but they didnt have the backbone or courage to do something about it, and look at the mess we have today, he said, explaining thatmost politicians do not want to tackle issues regarding immigration because they will be called a racist or bigot. But he said as governor, he will have a lot more power to do something about the issue. Barletta added that he recently called out PresidentJoe Biden, Gov. Tom Wolf (D), and State Attorney General Josh Shapiro over the ghost flights of illegals coming in the dead of the night, dumping them all over Pennsylvania without any knowledge.

He also noted that fentanyldeaths have hit a record high and we know the fentanyl is coming from the southern border. Yet Pennsylvania officials are continuing to allow Biden to dump illegal aliens in the Keystone State.

That ends when Im governor of Pennsylvania. I will go after anyone who aids what I think is human trafficking here into Pennsylvania dumping people without our knowledge into our communities, he said. Ill go after the buses or anybody that helps relocate people who are illegally being brought into Pennsylvania.

Barletta also said he will go after every sanctuary city with every resource that [he has] in [his] power to protect the citizens of Pennsylvania.

The former congressman also vowed to unleash energy in Pennsylvania as governor, noting that the Russian invasion of Ukraine highlights Bidens failure on our energy policy a major national security issue, he said.

And Pennsylvania is the answer to that. We have more energy in Pennsylvania than countries around the world, in the Middle East. We can be a global leader, and we will be when I become governor, Barletta said, vowing to drop the state out of theRegional Greenhouse Gas Initiative.

Were going to greenlight pipelines when Im governor. Were going to reform DEP [Department of Environmental Protection], which, he said, they used as a weapon to stop natural gas companies.

Pennsylvania is the answer to our national security issues, and when Im governor, well be a global leader again, he promised.

See the article here:
Exclusive -- Lou Barletta: Illegal Immigration 'Ends When ...

Florida joins multi-state lawsuit against Biden …

(The Center Square) Florida joined a multi-state coalition led by Texas suing the Biden administration for reinstating an Obama-era program that allows illegal immigrants to enter and remain in the U.S., bypassing laws established by Congress.

In addition to Texas and Florida, Indiana, Missouri, Montana, Oklahoma, Arkansas and Alaska joined the lawsuit over the Biden administration's reinstating a 2014-era Central America Minors (CAM) Program that was halted by the Trump administration in 2017.

The lawsuit announcement came after attorneys general from 12 states, all Republicans, participated in a border summit in the McAllen, Texas, area hosted by Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton.

Florida Attorney General Ashley Moody attended the summit and met with law enforcement officials about the dramatic overrun of the border brought on by President Joe Bidens reckless immigration policies the impact of which is resulting in public safety ramifications for citizens and taxpayers far beyond U.S. states that border Mexico, she said.

After seeing the chaos in person, it is even more clear to me now that Biden and [Department of Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro] Mayorkas are building their own illegal organization to transport illegal immigrants into and around our country thumbing their noses at federal laws. I will not only work aggressively to stop these illegal acts, but I will continue to inform Floridians about what their federal government is actually doing, and the dangers associated with those decisions, she added.

This was the second time Moody has been to the border with Paxton, after having attended a border summit in Del Rio last year about the joint efforts between Florida and Texas in Operation Lone Star. Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis and Texas Gov. Greg Abbott discussed the border security initiative. At the time, DeSantis said he was astonished to learn of how many illegal immigrants being apprehended said their final destination, after coming through the southern border, was Florida.

Florida, like Texas, sued the administration over its immigration policies last year, as well as over vaccine mandates.

Of this latest lawsuit, DeSantis said he was glad AG Moody was helping to block the reckless immigration policies of the Biden administration.

The Biden administration continues to disregard the laws of this country and allow massive numbers of illegal aliens across the border, without regard to possible criminal backgrounds or connections to illicit activity, DeSantis said. Not only are these illegal aliens allowed free reign in this country, but the administration also pushes the burden and costs onto the states and ignores the consequences of its policies.

The CAM program provides certain minors who entered the U.S. illegally the ability to secure protected status instead of being deported. The status then enables them to petition the government to bring in extended family members, including adult caregivers, from Honduras, El Salvador and Guatemala, without going through the proper legal channels, Moody said. CAM applies to illegal immigrants with a pending claim for asylum, though many may not be granted asylum or show up to their hearings, she added.

There is no authority in federal law for this sort of program, the AGs who sued argue, as Congress never authorized it.

The Biden administration reinstating CAM, the lawsuit argues, usurps the power of Congress to dictate a national scheme of immigration laws and is contrary to the Immigration Naturalization Act.

The Biden administration launched the program last March and expanded and revised it last June. It announced it would first begin processing eligible applications that were closed when CAM was terminated in 2017, and then begin accepting new applications with new guidance.

Secretary of State Antony J. Blinken and Mayorkas said reinstating CAM was responsible and another component of the Presidents multi-pronged approach to address the challenges of irregular migration throughout North and Central America. Blinken and Mayorkas said they were proud to expand access to the program to a greater number of qualifying individuals.

Those eligible for the program, they said, include legal guardians and parents who are in the U.S. illegally under withholding of removal status, deferred enforced departure status, deferred action, on parole, have temporary protected status or lawful permanent residence.

The changes will dramatically expand access to the CAM program, Blinken and Mayorkas said, adding that they were firmly committed to welcoming people to the United States with humanity and respect, as well as providing a legal alternative to irregular migration. We are delivering on our promise to promote safe, orderly, and humane migration from Central America through this expansion of legal pathways to seek humanitarian protection in the United States.

The AGs argues that most individuals in the program dont qualify as refugees and instead of the program being used on a case-by-case basis, depending on urgent humanitarian-related circumstances or significant public benefit, its being applied on a broad scale. Its arbitrary and capricious, the AGs argue, and violates the presidents duty to make sure that the laws are faithfully executed.

The complaint highlights the harm the program is causing Floridians by unlawfully admitting illegal immigrants into Florida, costing taxpayers millions of dollars.

Florida spends more than $100 million every year incarcerating people who are in the U.S. illegally and commit crimes, the complaint states. This is in addition to the untold number of public benefits illegal immigrants receive, regardless of their immigration status, including education, emergency medical services and victims services.

See original here:
Florida joins multi-state lawsuit against Biden ...