Archive for July, 2021

If critical race theory is off limits in Arizona schools today, what’s next? – The Arizona Republic

Opinion: Banning the teaching of critical race theory in Arizona schools is a slippery slope. What does Gov. Doug Ducey fear?

Joseph Russomanno| opinion contributor

What is Critical Race Theory?

CRT examines systemic racism as a part of American life and institutions and how it can give white people an advantage.

Erin Davoran and Dwight Adams, Wochit

When a government prohibits a specific message, thats censorship. Its also anti-democratic, despotic and disrespectful of its citizens, suggesting they are not equipped to handle the truth or even to consider alternate views.

Its also the sign of a weak government, one that fears new ideas that may challenge the status quo and expose existing myths. Controlling those ideas is mistakenly viewed as the best response.

When Gov. Doug Ducey signed legislation forbidding the teaching of critical race theory in Arizona schools, he checked all of these boxes and joined the truth deniers.

Another view: Sorry, Gov. Ducey, but you did NOT ban CRT

Truth doesnt magically appear. It comes from hard work that includes the serious consideration, discussion and debate of various ideas.

That discussion is not only protected by the First Amendment. Its also a primary reason our founders safeguarded speech and press from government interference with the First Amendment.

Exchanging ideas is the best path to truth discovery. Its an ongoing process with the possibility that what is regarded as truthful may be modified later when better evidence is discovered and considered. Limiting speech is an affront to truth discovery.

This loop of reconsideration is vital. Certainty is a trap. As the great jurist Oliver Wendell Holmes noted, Certitude is not the test of certainty. We have been cocksure of many things that were not so.

Existing beliefs need to be tested. The United States has committed itself to the idea of uninhibited, robust and wide open debate on public issues, at the same time recognizing that those discussions may be caustic. Both teachers and learners go to sleep at their post as soon as there is no enemy in the field, wrote philosopher John Stuart Mill.

Looking for the other side of the story? Subscribe today for access to even more opinions.

By closing discussion on an issue, one short-circuits the truth, becomes complicit in its cover-up and denies learning opportunities.

No issue merits more analysis than Americas tumultuous history with race. The new Arizona law, however, suppresses that effort, apparently steeped in misunderstanding of critical race theoryand the belief that it makes some people uncomfortable.

Guess what? Sometimes discovering the truth is uncomfortable.

In what has become a beacon for the exchange of ideas in schools, a University of Chicago report concluded that education should not be intended to make people comfortable, it is meant to make them think.

No venue is more appropriate to conduct the exchange of ideas so cherished by our founders than our schools. Reminders surface frequently, a notable example stemming recently from Chapel Hill, N.C.,and the botched hiring of Nikole Hannah-Jones, the chief architect of the Pulitzer Prize-winning 1619 Project. The classroom is ideal for considering ideas, including that white supremacy is far more ingrained in our culture than many believe.

This law banning teaching critical race theory is not only unconstitutional, but its supporters step onto a very slippery slope. If critical race theoryis off limits today, then what topics become inappropriate in the future? Climate change? Voting rights?

What happens to books on these topics, including those on CRT itself? Are book bans on the horizon, too? It seems that 1984was not in the past. Oceania beckons.

It is important to remember that critical race theory, though based in fact, is just that a theory subject to examination.

But theories are often the seeds of truth. Imagine if other theories had been banned from schools or general discussion over history: Newtons gravity, Galileos Heliocentric model of the solar system or Einsteins theory of relativity. These were thought to be heretical in some circles, yet today we think of those opposition views as backward and ignorant.

How will our descendants view the July 2021 version of us?

Joseph Russomanno is an expert on First Amendment law and theory and a professor at ASU's Walter Cronkite School of Journalism and Mass Communication. Reach him at russo@asu.edu.

Link:
If critical race theory is off limits in Arizona schools today, what's next? - The Arizona Republic

Governments Increase Pressure On Twitter To Censor Journalists – Forbes

Photo by Leon Neal/Getty Images

Governments are increasingly demanding the removal of journalist content from Twitter, the company's latest Transparency Report shows.

During the second half of 2020, says Twitter, it received 361 legal requests from governments to remove content from the verified accounts of 199 journalists and news outlets, up 26 per cent on the first half of the year.

Overall, the company says it received 38,524 legal demands to remove content specifying 131,933 accounts.

"Although there was a nine per cent decrease in the number of legal demands Twitter received, compared to the previous reporting period, these requests sought removal of content from the largest number of accounts ever in a single reporting period," says Twitter.

Twitter removed some or all of the content concerned in 29 per cent of cases almost all of which came from Japan, India, Russia, Turkey and South Korea.

Meanwhile, India has overtaken the US as the country making the most legal requests for information about accounts, representing a quarter of the total global volume and 15 per cent of the total number of accounts.

India has recently introduced new legislation aimed at regulating social media companies more tightly, and requiring them to appoint India-based chief compliance officers, nodal officers and grievance officers. The government has also stripped Twitter of its safe harbor immunity, meaning it is no longer protected from legal proceedings in the event of unlawful content posted by users.

The US, meanwhile, accounted for 22 per cent of information requests, and more than a third of emergency requests.

Twitter has also introduced a metric for tweets that violate its policies, and says that impressions on these tweets accounted for less than 0.1 per cent of all impressions for all tweets globally.

Of the 3.8 million tweets it removed for violating rules, more than three quarters received fewer than 100 impressions before they were pulled, with only six per cent getting more than 1,000 hits.

Enforcement of rule violation was up in several categories by 142 per cent in the case of abuse and harassment, 194 per cent for non-consensual nudity, 77 per cent for hateful conduct and 175 per cent for civic integrity violations such as the sharing of misleading election information.

Meanwhile, the number of accounts targeted for promoting suicide and self-harm nearly tripled.

There was only a six per cent rise in the number of accounts suspended for violations of Twitter's child sexual exploitation policy, and a 35 per cent fall in suspensions for terrorism and violent extremism.

However, says Twitter, "Varying country-specific Covid-19 restrictions and adjustments within our teams affected the efficiency of our content moderation work and the speed with which we enforced our policies."

Link:
Governments Increase Pressure On Twitter To Censor Journalists - Forbes

One of the best events on the CYO calendar: Atlas Foundation Youth Golf Tournament a big success – SILive.com

The Annual Dr. Theodore A. Atlas Memorial CYO Grammar School Jr. Golf Tournament wrapped up at Silver Lake last week, where youngsters Luke OBrien and Abigail Garcia (Sacred Heart) emerged victorious on the boys and girls circuits, respectively.

St. Patricks, meanwhile, captured the team title on the strength of strong play from Jake Morri, Colin Last, Joseph DeRosa, and Frank Bruno.

Finishing behind OBrien on the boys circuit were Brian Flaherty and Michael Molina, while Sienne Anderson served as Garcias runner-up on the girls end.

Runners-up Brian Flaherty and Michael Molina shake hands with winner Luke O'Brien (right)

Abigail Garcia (right) captured the girls' crown while Sienne Anderson finished second.

One of the best events on the CYO calendar year after year, said CYO director Michael Neely. Special thanks to the Atlas Foundation for sponsoring this event each and every year. The Foundation and its commitment to children is unwavering. Its a credit to Dr. Atlas, Teddy and the staff at the Atlas Foundation. The Catholic Youth Organization and its programs are lucky to benefit from such a wonderful group of people.

Id also like to thank the CYO Arhcdiocese of New York for allowing us to run such wonderful programs and CYO Jr. Golf Commissioner Matt Zuntag for putting this together, added Neely.

Elle Moeller, Jordan Moore and Lauren Neuheus

See the rest here:
One of the best events on the CYO calendar: Atlas Foundation Youth Golf Tournament a big success - SILive.com

Demographics of the European Union – Wikipedia

The demographics of the European Union show a highly populated, culturally diverse union of 27 member states.As of 1 February 2020, the population of the EU is about 445million people.[4]

The most populous member state is Germany, with an estimated 82.8million people, and the least populous member state is Malta with 0.48million. Birth rates in the EU are low with the average woman having 1.6 children. The highest birth-rates are found in Ireland with 16.876 births per thousand people per year and France with 13.013 births per thousand people per year. Spain has the lowest birth rate in Europe with 8.221 births per thousand people per year.

.[5]

The European Union has a significant number of global cities. It contained 13 of the 60 cities which composed the 2008 Global Cities Index,[7] as well as 16 of the 41 "alpha" global cities classified by Globalization and World Cities (GaWC) Research Network (including Paris, Milan, Amsterdam and Brussels among others).[8] The following is a list of the ten most populous cities, urban areas and urban zones in the European Union, with their population:

The movement of people within the Union i.e. internal migration, remains limited; it has traditionally followed two patterns:

At present, more people immigrate into the European Union than emigrate from it. Immigration is a controversial issue in many member states, including Belgium, Sweden, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Spain, and France.[citation needed] It was also a cited as a major factor in the Brexit referendum of 2016.

In 2010, 47.3 million people living in the EU, or 9.4% of the total population, had been born outside their resident country. Of these, 31.4 million (6.3%) had been born outside the EU; 16.0 million (3.2%) had been born in another member state. The largest absolute numbers of people born outside the EU were in Germany (6.4 million), France (5.1 million), Spain (4.1 million), Italy (3.2 million), and the Netherlands (1.4 million).[13]

In 2017, approximately 825,000 persons acquired citizenship of a member state of the European Union, down from 995,000 in 2016.[14] The largest groups were nationals of Morocco, Albania, India, Turkey and Pakistan.[15]

Spain in particular receives most of the immigrants coming illegally to Europe from Africa, probably due to its large coastal area and its proximity to and land borders with Morocco at Ceuta and Melilla; African immigrants try to enter the country by boat from Morocco or Senegal or by jumping the border fences. For example, during just the first weekend of September 2006, more than 1,300 illegal immigrants arrived on beaches in the Canary Islands[16] and estimates are that between 50,000 and 70,000 people enter the European Union illegally through Spanish borders or beaches. Border fences have been built at both the Ceuta and Melilla borders in an attempt to stop illegal entrance to the country. Illegal immigration is an issue in Spanish politics, and also a big human rights problem, since many people die during the journey. Spain has been Europe's largest absorber of migrants for the past six years, with its immigrant population increasing fourfold as 2.8million people have arrived, mostly from Latin America. Spectacular growth in Spain's immigrant population came as the country's economy created more than half of all the new jobs in the European Union between 2001 and 2006.[17]

The net migration rate for the EU in 2008 was 3.1 per 1,000 inhabitants;[18] this figure is for migration into and out of the European Union, and therefore excludes any internal movements between member states. Annual net migration has varied from 1.5 to 2.0million people since 2003.[18]

Since 2020, EU data is aggregated for the 27 remaining states. UK is no more a member due to Brexit.

Before Brexit, EU data was aggregated for 28 countries member of the EU from 2013 until 2020, including the UK.

The EU has significant religious diversity, mirroring its diverse history and culture. The largest religious group professes Christianity and accounts for 64% of the EU population in 2019,[21] down from 72% in 2012.[22] Largest Christian groups are Roman Catholicism, Protestantism and Eastern Orthodoxy. Several EU nations do not have a Christian majority and for example in Estonia and the Czech Republic the majority have no religious affiliation.

European countries have experienced a decline in church attendance as well as a decline in the number of people professing a religious belief. The 2010 Eurobarometer Poll found that, on average, 51% of the citizens of EU Member States state that they believe there is a God, 26% believe there is some sort of spirit or life force and 20% don't believe there is any sort of spirit, God or life force. 3% declined to answer.[23] These figures show a 2% change from theism to atheism since 2005.[22]

European indigenous (or native) religions are still alive in small and diverse minorities, especially in Scandinavia, Baltic states, Italy and Greece.[citation needed]

The recent influx of immigrants to the affluent EU nations has brought in various religions of their native homelands, including Islam, Hinduism, Buddhism, Sikhism and the Bah Faith. Judaism has had a long history in Europe and has coexisted with the other religions for centuries, despite periods of persecution or genocide by European rulers. Islam too has had a long history in Europe, with Spain and Portugal at one time having a Muslim majority.[24] Large Muslim populations also exist in the Balkans and parts of Eastern Europe, due to a legacy of centuries of Ottoman rule.

The first official language of each of the 27 Member Countries has the status of an official language of the European Union. In total there are 24, with Irish, Bulgarian and Romanian gaining official language status on 1 January 2007, when the last two countries joined the European Union, and Croatian becoming official in 2013.

Before Brexit, English was the most spoken language in the EU, being spoken by around 51% of its population. This high proportion is because 38% of EU citizens speak it as a language other than their mother tongue (i.e. second or foreign language).[3] German is the most spoken first language, spoken by more than 20% of the population following Brexit.

The EU faces challenges in its demographic future. Most concerns center around several related issues: an ageing population, growing life expectancy and immigrant flow.

After hitting a historical low of 1.47 children born per female, the total fertility rate of the EU started to increase again, to reach a level of 1.60 in 2008.[25] The positive trend was observed in all member states with the exception of Luxembourg, Malta and Portugal. The largest increases over this period were observed in Bulgaria (from 1.23 children per woman in 2003 to 1.57 in 2009), Slovenia (from 1.20 to 1.53), the Czech Republic (from 1.18 to 1.49) and Lithuania (from 1.26 to 1.55).[25] In 2009, the Member States with the highest fertility rates were Ireland (2.06), France (2.00), Sweden (1.94), and the United Kingdom (1.90), all approaching the replacement level of 2.1 children born per female.[25] The lowest rates were observed in Latvia (1.31), Hungary and Portugal (both 1.32) and Germany (1.36). The increasing fertility rate has also been accompanied by an upward trend in the natural increase of the population which is due to the moderate increase of the crude birth rate that reached 10.9 births per 1000 inhabitants in 2008, an increase of 0.3 compared with 2007. The increase was observed in all member countries except Germany. The EU crude death rate remained stable at 9.7 per 1000 inhabitants.[18] The relatively low fertility rate means retirement age workers are not entirely replaced by younger workers joining the workforce. The EU faces a potential future dominated by an ever-increasing population of retired citizens, without enough younger workers to fund (via taxes) retirement programs or other state welfare agendas.[26]

A low fertility rate, without supplement from immigration, also suggests a declining overall EU population,[27] which further suggests economic contraction or even a possible economic crisis.[28] Some media have noted the 'baby crisis' in the EU,[29] some governments have noted the problem,[30] and the UN and other multinational authorities have warned of a possible crisis.[31] At this point however such a decrease in the population of the EU is not observed as the overall natural growth remains positive and the EU continues to attract large numbers of immigrants. In 2010, a breakdown of the population by citizenship showed that there were 20.1 million foreign citizens living in the EU representing 4% of the population.[25]

Over the last 50 years, life expectancy at birth in the EU27 has increased by around 10 years for both women and men, to reach 82.4 years for women and 76.4 years for men in 2008. The life expectancy at birth rose in all Member States, with the largest increases for both women and men recorded in Estonia and Slovenia.[25]

In 2017, Eurostat released yearly projections up to 2080.

The table figures below are in thousands.[32]

There is no precise or universally accepted definition of the terms "ethnic group" or "nationality". In the context of European ethnography in particular, the terms ethnic group, people (without nation state), nationality, national minority, ethnic minority, linguistic community, linguistic group and linguistic minority are used as mostly synonymous, although preference may vary in usage with respect to the situation specific to the individual countries of Europe.[33]

Defining ethnic composition requires defining ethnic minority groups.European Commission, funded the European Social Survey which considered three different way to define ethnic minority groups:

However main legal EU statistics published by Eurostat focus on citizenship and country of birth.

The largest groups that account for about 400 million people in the European Union are:

The rest are various smaller ethnic groups include Swedes (c. 10.2 million), Hungary (c. 9.8million), Austrians (c. 8.8million), Bulgaria (c. 8 million) Flemish, Croats, Slovaks, Silesians, Danes, Finns, Irish, Walloons, Lithuanians, Slovenes, Latvians, Estonians, Russians, Maltese, Moravians, Frisians and Basques.

More than 5 million ethnic groups

On current trends European populations will become more ethnically diverse, with the possibility that today's majority ethnic groups will no longer comprise a numerical majority in some countries.[37]

In 2011, almost a quarter of new EU citizens were Moroccans, Turks, Ecuadorian or Indians. The new citizens in the old EU27 in 2011 came mainly from Africa (26% of the total number of citizenships acquired), Asia (23%), non-EU27 Europe (19%), North and South America (17%) or another EU27 Member State (11%). In 2011, the largest groups that acquired citizenship of an EU27 Member State were citizens of Morocco (64 300 persons, of which 55% acquired citizenship of France or Spain), Turkey (48 900, 58% acquired German citizenship), Ecuador (33 700, 95% acquired Spanish citizenship) and India (31 700, 83% acquired British citizenship).[38]

In 2012, 34.3 million foreign citizens lived in the old 27 European Union member states, accounting for 6.8% of the European Union population,[39] of whom 20.5 million were third country nationals (i.e. nationals of non-EU countries). The number of foreign-born (which includes those who have naturalised or are dual nationals) was 48.9 million or 9.7 per cent of the total population.[40]

A total of 8.0 million citizens from European countries outside of the old EU-27 were residing in the EU at the beginning of 2012; among these more than half were citizens of Turkey, Albania or Ukraine. The next biggest group was from Africa (24.5%), followed by Asia (22.0%), the Americas (14.2%) and Oceania (0.8%). Romanians (living in another EU Member State) and Turkish citizens made up the biggest groups of non-nationals living in the EU-27 in 2012. There were 4.4 million Romanian citizens living outside of Romania within the EU-27 and 2.3 million Turkish citizens living in the EU-27; each of these two groups of people accounted for 7.0% of all foreigners living in the EU-27 in 2012. The third largest group was Moroccans (1.9 million people, or 5.6% of all foreigners).[41]

Approximately 20 million non-Europeans live in the EU, 4% of the overall population prior to Brexit.[42]

Age structure: (2006 est.)

Birth rate: 10.9 births/1,000 population (2008)[43]

Death rate: 9.7 deaths/1,000 population (2008)[43]

Net migration rate: 3.1 migrant(s)/1,000 population (2008)[43]

Marriage rate: 4.9 marriages/1,000 population (2007)[43]

Divorce rate: 2.0 divorces/1,000 population (2005)[44]

Sex ratio: (2006 est.)

Infant mortality rate: (2005)[44]

Life expectancy: (2005)[44]

Total fertility rate: 1.59 children born/woman 2009[45]

Live Births outside marriage: 40% of total live births in 2012[46]

The demographics of the member states of the European Union:

Here is the original post:
Demographics of the European Union - Wikipedia

European Union Unveils Climate Plan To Cut Emissions By 55% This Decade – NPR

The European Union on Wednesday unveiled sweeping new legislation to help meet its pledge to cut emissions of the gases that cause global warming by 55% over this decade. Virginia Mayo/AP hide caption

The European Union on Wednesday unveiled sweeping new legislation to help meet its pledge to cut emissions of the gases that cause global warming by 55% over this decade.

BRUSSELS The European Union unveiled sweeping new legislation Wednesday to help meet its pledge to cut emissions of the gases that cause global warming by 55% over this decade, including a controversial plan to tax foreign companies for the pollution they cause.

The legislation presented by the EU's executive branch, the European Commission, encompasses about a dozen major proposals, ranging from the de-facto phasing out of gasoline and diesel cars by 2035 to new levies on gases from heating buildings.

They involve a revamp of the bloc's emissions trading program, under which companies pay for carbon dioxide they emit, and introduce taxes on shipping and aviation fuels for the first time.

Most of the proposals build on existing laws that were designed to meet the EU's old goal of a 40% cut in greenhouse gas emissions by 2030 compared to 1990 levels and must be endorsed by the 27 member countries and EU lawmakers.

World leaders agreed six years ago in Paris to work to keep global temperatures from increasing more than 2 degrees Celsius (3.6 degrees Fahrenheit), and ideally no more than 1.5 degrees C (2.7 F) by the end of the century. Scientists say both goals will be missed by a wide margin unless drastic steps are taken to reduce emissions.

"The principle is simple: emission of CO2 must have a price, a price on CO2 that incentivizes consumers, producers and innovators to choose the clean technologies, to go toward the clean and sustainable products," European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said.

The commission wants to exploit the public mood for change provoked by the COVID-19 pandemic. It's already channeling more than one-third of a massive recovery package aimed at reviving European economies ravaged by coronavirus restrictions into climate-oriented goals.

The aim of the "Fit for 55" legislation, commission officials say, is to ween the continent off fossil fuels and take better care of the environment by policy design, rather than be forced into desperate measures at some future climatic tipping point, when it's all but too late.

European Commission Executive Vice-President Frans Timmermans said that by failing to act now, "we would fail our children and grandchildren, who in my view, if we don't fix this, will be fighting wars over water and food."

Given the implications, the proposals are certain to be subject to intense lobbying from industry and environmental groups as they pass through the legislative process over at least the next year. They'll also face resistance because of the very different energy mixes in member countries, ranging from coal-reliant Poland to nuclear-dependent France.

Germany's environment minister, Svenja Schulze, said negotiations need to focus on maintaining the ambitious targets in a reliable way, be fair to the poor and ensure all of Europe "goes down this path together."

"National solo efforts won't lead to the goal," she said. "There needs to be a coordinated, massive expansion of sun and wind power from the North Sea to the Mediterranean."

Echoing the thoughts of some climate scientists, Oxfam EU head Evelien van Roemburg urged the member countries and lawmakers to be more ambitious than the European Commission.

"They must step up ambition by ensuring all EU climate rules contribute to carbon emission cuts of at least 65% in 2030, rather than the current 55%," she said.

Among the legislation's most controversial elements is a plan for a "Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism." It would impose duties on foreign companies and therefore increase the price of certain goods, notably steel, aluminum, concrete and fertilizer.

The aim is to ease pressure on European producers that cut emissions but struggle to compete with importers that don't have the same environmental restrictions.

The question is how the EU known for its staunch defense of open trade will ensure that the carbon tax complies with World Trade Organization rules and not be considered a protectionist measure.

Another concern is the need to help those likely to be hit by rising energy prices. The commission is proposing the creation of a "social climate fund" worth several billion euros to help those who might be hardest hit.

"This fund will support income and it will support investments to tackle energy poverty and to cut bills for vulnerable households and small businesses," von der Leyen said.

But Martha Myers, a member of the climate justice team at Friends of the Earth Europe, said the decision to extend emissions trading to buildings "throws low-income people into high energy price waters while offering only a swimming float of support to relieve energy poverty."

Under Fit for 55, a drastic acceleration in sales of battery-powered cars also is likely as the EU aims for a 100% reduction in auto emissions.

Hildegard Mueller, president of the German Association of the Automobile Industry, said the industry supports the EU goal of reaching climate neutrality by 2050. But she said that goal can only be accomplished "if the consumers and companies can implement these goals."

Mueller warned of a "substantial" impact on jobs at auto suppliers that would struggle with the pace of the changeover.

View post:
European Union Unveils Climate Plan To Cut Emissions By 55% This Decade - NPR