Archive for March, 2021

Is Amazon allowed to censor conservative books? – Deseret News

Editors note: The death of Rush Limbaugh, the growth of Newsmax and charges of censorship by Amazon and other book sellers are among the forces shaking up conservative media companies. In this three-part series, the Deseret News examines the challenges facing radio, television and book publishing, and how those challenges might affect the companies and you: the reader, listener and viewer.

Missouri Sen. Josh Hawley lost a book deal. Harry Potter creator J.K. Rowling lost fans. And now, even as a prospective merger of two large publishing houses in the U.S. is rattling the industry, Amazon is deleting content it deems offensive from the worlds largest platform for book sales.

In this tumultuous landscape, can conservative authors still continue to speak freely and sell books?

Yes, publishers say, but they may have to change the way they do business in a culture newly cognizant of the power to cancel people with unpopular opinions.

We dont let it directly determine what we publish, but the fact is, with every book, there is always fear that the book is going to be pulled. The authors feel very vulnerable, said David Bernstein, publisher of Bombardier Books, a conservative imprint of Post Hill Press.

Conservative fears were realized this month when the book When Harry Became Sally: Responding to the Transgender Moment, by Catholic scholar Ryan T. Anderson, vanished from the Amazon website three years after it was published.

Four Republican senators, including Utahs Mike Lee, called the action political censorship, saying in a letter to CEO Jeff Bezos that Amazon has openly signaled to conservative Americans that their views are not welcome on its platforms.

But the controversy over Andersons book is only the latest action troubling conservative writers and publishers. Others include the cancellation of a forthcoming Hawley book critical of technology companies by Simon & Schuster, protests against a new book by Canadian psychologist and author Jordan Peterson, and an open letter signed by people in the publishing industry who say no one affiliated with former President Donald Trumps administration should get a book contract.

The tremors shaking book publishing usually go undetected by the public, since the average reader only pays attention to the book, its content and the author, not the company that publishes a book, said Thomas Spence, who became president and publisher of Regnery Publishing a year ago.

Regnery, founded in 1947, has published books by Ann Coulter, Newt Gingrich, Michelle Malkin and Dennis Prager, among other conservatives well acquainted with controversy. Regnerys success was a major reason that the largest publishing houses in the U.S. established their own conservative imprints, publishing insiders say.

But the outcry against authors who express unpopular beliefs is growing louder in the environment known as cancel culture, and some writers are warning that recent events will effectively muzzle conservatives. The backlash to Amazons decision, however, suggests that the outlook for conservative publishing is still bright. Heres why.

Andersons book, described by author Rod Dreher as a well-written, scientifically informed critique of gender ideology by a leading Catholic public intellectual, is still for sale on the website of the publisher, Encounter Books, as well as on the Barnes & Noble website and other places online.

Anderson, who recently became president of the Ethics & Public Policy Center in Washington, D.C., told Dreher, writing for The American Conservative, that he has sold a couple of thousand books in the past week, adding this is unheard of for a three-year-old book.

He noted that Amazons action came at the same time Congress was considering the Equality Act and suggested that Amazons action has a silver lining, which is this could be (the) further catalyst thatll interrupt the libertarian slumber of many conservatives and prompt them to think critically about what, for example, the natural law says about both the justification of and limits to economic liberties.

Author Abigail Shrier is not as optimistic. Shrier, a journalist whose book Irreversible Damage: The Transgender Craze Seducing Our Daughters, has been removed twice from the Target website, wrote that the Amazon case is dangerous because of the outsized influence the company wields in publishing.

As a direct result of Amazons action, many outstanding books will now go unwritten; they will not be commissioned whenever Amazons distribution is the slightest bit in doubt. As I write this, authors are being dropped by agents or politely refused representation, based on what the agents now know Amazon will not carry, Shrier wrote.

Shriers book, however, is still listed on Amazon, as is God and the Transgender Debate, an examination of what the Bible has to say about gender by Southern Baptist theologian Andrew T. Walker.

So is a take on Andersons book, Let Harry Become Sally, an e-book by Kelly R. Novak that Amazon billed last week as a #1 best seller.

Amazon has not given a specific reason for removing Andersons book, saying only that the company reserves the right to delist content that violates its standards.

In an email, Anderson said this could be a moment that determines how the company will operate going forward. If Amazon hears from enough people, perhaps that will lead it to reconsider its decision and not just on me, but also preventing future de-platforming. If Amazon gets away with this, itll likely lead to more de-platforming in the future.

While Anderson can only speculate about the reasons his book is no longer on Amazon, Hawley, the Missouri senator, knows why Simon & Schuster canceled his book contract because the company put out a statement. Without giving specifics, the publisher said that Hawley, a Trump supporter who was the first senator to say he would challenge the 2020 election results, had a role in the deadly Jan. 6 Capitol riot.

As a publisher it will always be our mission to amplify a variety of voices and viewpoints; at the same time, we take seriously our larger public responsibility as citizens, and cannot support Senator Hawley after his role in what became a dangerous threat to our democracy and freedom, the statement said.

Hawleys book deal was canceled the day after the riot. The next week, more than 250 authors, editors, agents and other workers in publishing signed an open letter that said no companies should publish work by anyone who incited, suborned, instigated or otherwise supported the riot, or who was a participant in the Trump administration. The number of signers is now approaching 600.

But within two weeks, Hawley had another publisher in Regnery, and Spence explained the decision in an op-ed for The Wall Street Journal, in which he said cancel culture is more appropriately described as blacklisting.

Not so long ago, publishing professionals would have been horrified to be accused of it. Today they compete to see who can proclaim his blacklist with the fiercest invective, Spence wrote.

So far, Amazon hasnt been inclined to cancel Hawleys book; its accepting pre-orders for The Tyranny of Big Tech and gives a release date of May 4.

Spence said hed been following Hawleys career knew he was a Yale Law School graduate and was a former Supreme Court clerk and had thought it would be nice to have a book from him before this one essentially landed in his lap. A lot of people have sent me emails saying, Oh, youre so courageous, thanks for taking a stand and taking this book, and I have to blush. I think I did the right thing, but I dont know that it was particularly courageous in this case, he said.

Getting canceled by Simon & Schuster has raised the profile of the book a lot, he added.

That has happened before, said Bernstein of Bombardier Books. When Simon & Schuster canceled a book by Milo Yiannopoulos in 2017, the far-right commentator self-published Dangerous and sold upwards of 100,000 copies, Bernstein said.

Donald Trump Jr. also self-published his second book, Liberal Privilege.

Bernstein said that conservative imprints such as Center Street at Hachette Book Group or Sentinel at Penguin are ghettos within the largest publishing houses, which he said skew young and liberal. The problem with conservative books within the large publishing houses is that theyre not going to support you if there is any controversy. The first whiff of controversy, Josh Hawley gets his book canceled. The first whiff of controversy, (Florida GOP Congressman) Matt Gaetz gets his book canceled. The editors get fired or get shifted around. Or the imprint gets closed. All of these things are happening at an increasing pace right now.

The New York Times recently reported that longtime editor Kate Hartson, editorial director at Center Street, had been let go and that Hartson told colleagues she thought her termination was because of her political beliefs. She had published books by Donald Trump Jr., Newt Gingrich, radio host Michael Savage and Rand Paul, among others. Her most recent book was reported to be Unmasked: Inside Antifas Radical Plan to Destroy Democracy, by Andy Ngo.

Not every objection to an author results in a book being canceled. When Penguin Random House Canada announced that it was publishing Jordan Petersons Beyond Order: 12 More Rules for Life, the company had to hold a town-hall style meeting for employees who were upset about the decision. It was published anyway. (In the U.S., the book was released March 2 under Penguins Portfolio imprint.)

And some authors, like J.K. Rowling, have the benefit of being too successful to be truly canceled, Bernstein said. Her position in publishing is kind of untouchable. When you make up that much of a companys bottom line shes like a line item of her own on their balance sheet no company is going to release her and give up that revenue.

For many conservative authors, however, the fear of being de-platformed is real, whether it be on a sales platform or social media.

Frankly, the number of books that get pulled off of Amazon is infinitesimal, but these stories get magnified and people are rightly concerned, because the number of people being de-platformed on Twitter started off being very small, too, Bernstein said.

Small conservative imprints such as Bombardier may benefit from the current environment if authors seek publishers who share their views. But so may Regnery, whose namesake, the late Henry Regnery, published Memoirs of a Dissident Publisher in 1979.

Spence, who said his views were shaped by the First Things essay Why the News Make Us Dumb by C. John Sommerville and The Conservative Mind by Russell Kirk, welcomes the business, although he realizes that this may be a particularly vulnerable moment for conservative publishers.

Certain big players in the publishing world have the power to make our business very difficult if they want to. Thats Amazon and Google, all the people targeted by Josh Hawleys book, and maybe Im stupid to be publishing a book punching them in the nose, Spence said.

If we couldnt sell our books on Amazon, that would be a pretty serious blow. We sell most of our books on Amazon. What they have done on rare occasions is make it more difficult for people to find our books. He cited Shriers book, which Regnery published. The company wanted to buy ads that would make the book more prominent in searches, but Spence said that Amazon would not let them buy ads for that book.

Spence is also cognizant of the power of Facebook and Twitter, and that social media platforms could also take action to block promotion of one of his authors or books.

Theres a lot of potential hazards on the road ahead, he said. But its also good times for Regnery, because theres no such thing as bad publicity. Controversy is good.

View original post here:
Is Amazon allowed to censor conservative books? - Deseret News

Chris Selley: For the love of Seuss, leave libraries alone – National Post

Breadcrumb Trail Links

It is to the eternal shame of many in the self-styled progressive community that they have turned against the library system for the crime of tolerating free expression

Author of the article:

Publishing date:

If Dr. Seuss Enterprises did anything useful last week in taking six of the late doctors books out of print, surely it could have done something more useful by showing its work: Which hurtful and wrong depictions and descriptions of non-white people did its panel of experts consider beyond the pale, and which did it not, and why? Seuss Enterprises is free to publish and not publish whatever it wants, but its decisions will contribute to a much broader and important conversation about what to do with otherwise beloved or revered literature, especially childrens literature, that reflects unfortunate attitudes of its period.

Some of the culprits are clear: In If I Ran the Zoo, published in 1950, stereotypical caricatures of African and Asian men are depicted helping young Gerald McGrew collect his menagerie including from the mountains of Zomba-ma-Tant, where young Geralds aides all wear their eyes at a slant. But much of the other material is far less obviously problematic not just compared to the six delisted titles, but potentially also to Seusss most famous and beloved works, which his executors presumably wish to continue selling for profit.

This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

The Grinch is thought of by some as a Jewish stereotype, taking diabolical glee in subverting societal norms and desecrating Christian traditions, as University of Michigan literature professor Ryan Szpiech wrote in 2019. In 2014, Kansas State University childrens literature scholar Philip Nel argued the Grinch also echoes 19th-century caricatures of the Irish and that The Cat In the Hat is about a conflict between white children and a black cat whose character and costume borrow from blackface performance.

These were academic analyses, not denunciations. Neither was calling for any of Seusss work to be unpublished. But in the court of public opinion nowadays, things can spin out of control awfully fast. No ones setting these (books) on fire. No ones saying you cannot read them, Nel told Esquire last week, arguing the controversy was overblown. No ones saying they must be removed from libraries. No ones saying they must be removed from your home.

I can report from Toronto that this is not the case. Now looms a larger question, Toronto Star journalist Evy Kwong intoned last week on the papers TikTok account: What happens to the books that are still in the bookstore or at the library?

Its unclear on (sic) whether Dr. Seuss Enterprises will be mandating that the six books be removed from circulation across the globe, the paper reported.

This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

In a follow-up article on Monday, another Star reporter found and interviewed a woman who was offering for sale her personal copy of one of the cancelled Seuss books. The reporter explained that the womanbelieves she should maintain freedom to have or sell the titles, despite the conclusion of others or positions of companies much in the way she might believe the Earth orbits the sun and not vice versa.

Does it really need explaining that books are private property? That libraries have something much closer to an obligation to retain out-of-print or unpopular books than an obligation to get rid of them for historians sake, if no one elses?

The Chicago Tribune reports the citys public library system will allow the copies currently on loan to remain with their borrowers, and honour existing holds, and thereafter temporarily keep the books as reference copies while it assesses long-term options. If one of those options is not keeping at least one copy each as a reference item, then we have wandered into a very dark place. I trust that wont be the case in Chicago.

The Star, meanwhile, managed to find a Toronto bookstore proprietor who objected even to library staff taking the time to review the books content before deciding what to do. If the people who produce the book say theres an original culture concern why are you questioning it? Miguel San Vincente demanded to know.

Libraries have something much closer to an obligation to retain out-of-print or unpopular books than an obligation to get rid of them

Its mind-boggling. The Toronto Public Library keeps copies of discredited memoirs, preludes to genocide, inspirations to terrorists, anti-Islamic and anti-Christian and anti-Semitic and anti-atheist screeds, pulp non-fiction from Ann Coulter and Naomi Klein alike, and everything in between and beyond. Because thats what a library is for.

This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

It is to the eternal shame of many in Torontos self-styled progressive community that they have turned against the library system for the crime of tolerating free expression a grotesque phenomenon that reached its nadir when it dared unapologetically to rent a room to a feminist (but allegedly transphobic) activist in 2019 to deliver a really quite anodyne speech.

And it is bewildering that they cant see the truth lying just beyond their own noses: that if they ever manage to win these battles to silence unpopular voices of the moment, they will inevitably wind up ruing the day.Every year the American Library Associations Office for Intellectual Freedom publishes a list of the most challenged books in American libraries. In 2019, eight of the top 10 were on the list because of LGBTQIA+ content. The other two were Margaret Atwoods The Handmaids Tale and the Harry Potter series.

When culture warriors on any side lose the plot, dispassionate librarians in Toronto and many other cities are there to help them find it again. They just have to let them do their jobs. Assuming (confidently) that Torontos chief librarians dont decide to send the troublesome Seuss titles to the woodchipper, or alternatively to put them front and centre in their branches childrens sections, I suggest we defer to their wisdom.

Email: cselley@nationalpost.com | Twitter: cselley

This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

Sign up to receive the daily top stories from the National Post, a division of Postmedia Network Inc.

A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it please check your junk folder.

The next issue of Posted Newsletter will soon be in your inbox.

We encountered an issue signing you up. Please try again

Postmedia is committed to maintaining a lively but civil forum for discussion and encourage all readers to share their views on our articles. Comments may take up to an hour for moderation before appearing on the site. We ask you to keep your comments relevant and respectful. We have enabled email notificationsyou will now receive an email if you receive a reply to your comment, there is an update to a comment thread you follow or if a user you follow comments. Visit our Community Guidelines for more information and details on how to adjust your email settings.

Originally posted here:
Chris Selley: For the love of Seuss, leave libraries alone - National Post

‘I could hear my heart racing’: Ukrainian women referee recalls journey to the top – Reuters

KYIV (Reuters) - Kateryna Monzul made history in 2016 when she became the first female referee in Ukraine to officiate a soccer match in the mens top division, a game between Chornomorets Odesa against Volyn Lutsk.

Despite the mental training, when I went out on the soccer pitch and watched the teams lining up, I could hear my heart racing. I was overwhelmed with emotions, recalls Monzul.

That game was part of a journey for the 39-year-old that began with refereeing childrens and youth championships and took her all the way to refereeing the Womens World Cup Final between the United States and Japan in 2015.

Since then she became the first woman to referee Ukraines domestic cup final last year and was named the best referee in the mens division by the Ukrainian Association of Football in an otherwise male field.

Women referees at mens top flight soccer matches are rare. Frances Stephanie Frappart became the first woman to referee a major UEFA competition final in 2019 and in December she also became the first woman to referee a mens Champions League match when she officiated at the Juventus-Dynamo Kyiv game.

This week Monzul joined other women in speaking about the challenges they face and the hopes they have ahead of International Womens Day on Monday.

Monzul grew up in the eastern Kharkiv region with a soccer pitch next to her home.

I played soccer with boys. It was not popular among girls back then, but I liked it, I lived and breathed soccer, said Monzul, who played on boys teams in local tournaments.

Inspired by her uncle, who was a referee, Monzul switched to officiating.

Just like in any other job, the most important thing is to do your job professionally. Then your skills will be in demand, no matter if you are a man or a woman, Monzul told Reuters.

It is the result which matters, not gender.

To be eligible for officiating mens matches, she has to pass a mens fitness test, the toughest part for a woman, Monzul said.

She said there was no difference between refereeing a mens or womens match, except that it is a common thing for mens clubs to gift Monzul flowers.

In 2016 the team which presented me with red flowers got a red card. And since then there is a joke that it is better to give flowers after the game, not before.

Editing by Matthias Williams and Raissa Kasolowsky

Read more:
'I could hear my heart racing': Ukrainian women referee recalls journey to the top - Reuters

Market split on whether Ukraine will raise interest rate from 6% this week: Reuters poll – Reuters

KYIV (Reuters) - Analysts are divided on whether Ukraines central bank will raise its key interest rate on March 4 or hold it steady, balancing the need to restrain inflation with supporting a virus-hit economy, a Reuters poll showed on Tuesday.

FILE PHOTO: People wearing protective face masks visit the Central Universal Department Store (TsUM), on the first day after ending a coronavirus lockdown, in Kyiv, Ukraine January 25, 2021. REUTERS/Valentyn Ogirenko

Half of the 16 Ukrainian analysts see the National Bank of Ukraine (NBU) holding the rate at a historic post-1991 independence low of 6.0%, to prevent a rise in borrowing costs and to support businesses.

The central bank will not raise the rate despite a significant acceleration of inflation because of the relatively weak performance in industrial production, said Hanna Cherednychenko from the First Ukrainian International Bank.

Industrial output, which started recovering in December, shrank 4.0% year-on-year in January when the government imposed a two-week nationwide lockdown against the spread of the novel coronavirus.

The economy overall contracted by more than 4% last year.

Eight analysts believe that the central bank will raise its rate: six of them expect 6.5% and two expect 6.25%.

This action would fully comply with the current strategy of the NBU on inflation targeting, said Oleksandr Pecherytsyn from Credit Agricole Bank.

Inflation jumped to 6.1% in January, above the central banks target of around 5%, and analysts see February inflation even higher at 7.2%, their median forecast showed.

Central Bank Governor Kyrylo Shevchenko told Reuters last month that the NBU was ready to raise the rate if inflationary pressures strengthened further.

Alexander Paraschiy from Concorde Capital brokerage, who forecasts the rate at 6.5%, said the central bank had to restrain growing inflationary expectations.

The National Bank is unlikely to dare to do a significant increase, but they have to give a signal to the market that they are trying to curb inflation.

Editing by Matthias Williams; editing by Barbara Lewis

Original post:
Market split on whether Ukraine will raise interest rate from 6% this week: Reuters poll - Reuters

Northern Ireland to face Ukraine for Euro qualification – RTE.ie

Northern Ireland Women have been drawn against Ukraine in the play-offs for a place at Euro 2022.

Kenneth Shiels' squad won their final two Group C games to edge out Wales on head-to-head away goals and secure second place behind Norway in qualifying for the tournament.

Ukraine overtook the Republic of Ireland in their final Group I match to claim the runners-up spot behind Germany.

Friday's draw to determine the three remaining places in England next summer had initially seen Russia pulled out of the pot to face Ukraine.

However, with UEFA not allowing Russia and Ukraine to be drawn together for political reasons, the Russians, second in Group A behind defending European champions Holland, will instead face Portugal.

The final play-off tie sees the Czech Republic take on Switzerland, with the fixtures to take place over two legs from 7-13 April.

Euro 2022 will see 16 nations compete across 10 venues during July, with the final to be played at Wembley.

A depleted Northern Ireland squad were beaten 6-0 by England in a behind-closed-doors friendly at St George's Park last week, which marked Hege Riise's first game in temporary charge of the Lionesses.

Link:
Northern Ireland to face Ukraine for Euro qualification - RTE.ie