Archive for February, 2021

6 High School Interns Join the Search Influence Team as Part of YouthForce NOLA Partnership – PR Web

"It is impactful for the interns to have someone relatable they can work with to see what's possible for them." Teri Murphy, Search Influence account coordinator and second year YouthForce mentor.

NEW ORLEANS (PRWEB) February 09, 2021

This spring, Search Influence will welcome a cohort of six interns from YouthForce NOLA. YouthForce NOLA is a nonprofit organization that collaborates with businesses to prepare young people from underserved communities in New Orleans for fulfilling careers in high-demand industries. Search Influence and YouthForce NOLA have had a long-standing partnership that dates back to the internship program's inception in 2015. Since that time, Search Influence has hosted more than 10 interns, with two continuing to work at the agency after completing their internships.

Search Influence and YouthForce NOLA are working together to safely resume their partnership during the coronavirus pandemic. Currently, Search Influence's employees are working remotely, and the YouthForce NOLA intern cohort will join the team virtually. The six high school students participating in the internship program attend public charter schools in New Orleans: Booker T. Washington High School, Livingston Collegiate Academy, and the New Orleans Military and Maritime Academy.

"As a digital marketing agency that is actively involved in developing local talent, being a part of this program is a wonderful feeling," said Search Influence co-founder and COO Angie Scott. "For our interns, understanding how to navigate and thrive in professional environments will be critical to their success in the future."

The interns who are joining Search Influence will learn about many aspects of digital marketing, including:

Each YouthForce NOLA intern will be paired up with a mentor who will guide them throughout the experience. The mentor coordinates training with agency subject matter experts and offers feedback as they progress through the program.

"I love working with the interns because I recognize how important professional experience is for a young person trying to navigate what their career and 'adult life' will look like," said Teri Murphy, an account coordinator at Search Influence and second time YouthForce mentor. "I think it's impactful for the interns to have someone relatable they can work with to see what's possible for them."

To learn more about Search Influence's services and its partnerships with other nonprofit organizations, visit their website at http://www.searchinfluence.com or call (504) 208-3900.

Search Influence is a digital marketing agency based in New Orleans that serves local and national clients. With ROI-focused marketing strategies that help optimize the potential of each client, Search Influence offers search engine optimization, paid digital advertising, social media marketing, and other made-to-measure strategies that elevate a business's connection with its target customers.

Share article on social media or email:

Follow this link:
6 High School Interns Join the Search Influence Team as Part of YouthForce NOLA Partnership - PR Web

Jeff Joll receives Computer Troubleshooters Franchisee of the Year Award – PR Web

I was very proud to award Jeff Joll the Computer Troubleshooters Franchisee of the Year award at the 2020 Conference. Jeff has worked hard to build a strong and successful business in the Pittsburgh area that provides industry-leading solutions with the highest level of quality and service.

PITTSBURGH (PRWEB) February 09, 2021

2020 Award Recipients Announced at Computer Troubleshooters Annual Conference

The Computer Troubleshooters Franchise congratulates the 2020 Annual Conference award recipients on their achievements.

Computer Troubleshooters hosted its 2020 Annual Computer Troubleshooters Conference virtually this year in an effort to keep franchisees, vendors, and presenters safe during the COVID-19 pandemic. Every year, the Computer Troubleshooters network takes this opportunity to strategize, network, and honor exceptional franchisees with various awards. This year, Computer Troubleshooters presented the 2020 Franchisee of the Year Award to Jeff Joll.

The recipient of Computer Troubleshooters Franchisee of the Year, Jeff has been with the franchise for over a decade with his office located in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. He is a network leader in mentorship, education, and computer services.

"I was very proud to award Jeff Joll the Computer Troubleshooters Franchisee of the Year award at the 2020 CT Virtual Conference. Jeff has worked hard to build a strong and successful business in the Pittsburgh area that provides industry-leading solutions with the highest level of quality and service. As a member of the Computer Troubleshooters franchise since 2010, Jeff has always been actively involved in the organization and very supportive of his fellow franchise owners. Through our CT Mentor Program, Jeff and other successful franchise owners mentor smaller franchise locations in a rigorous program designed to use the mentors skills and experience to help support and educate other owners on how to build their own successful business. Jeff is truly an asset to the Computer Troubleshooters organization," said Kim Weinberger, the National Director of Business Development.

In addition to announcing the 2020 Franchisee of the Year Award at the virtual conference, Computer Troubleshooters also recognized three franchisees as part of the CT Million Dollar Club.

"The CT Million Dollar Club is an award given to franchise owners that achieve a minimum of $1 million in revenue in the previous year," said Kim. "At the 2020 CT Virtual Conference, we were thrilled to announce the three franchise owners that qualified for this award in 2020: Jeff Joll of CT Pittsburgh Central; Chris Long of CT North Phoenix; and Bryan Windam - CT El Dorado."

The Computer Troubleshooters network congratulates the 2020 annual conference award recipients on their achievements and wishes them continued success.

To contact 2020 Franchisee of the Year and 2020 inductee of the Million Dollar Club, Jeff Joll, please contact:Computer Troubleshooters Pittsburgh2199 West Run RdMunhall, PA 15120412-462-3400https://www.ct-pgh.com/

To contact Chris Long, 2020 inductee of the Million Dollar Club, please contact:Computer Troubleshooters Phoenix - Central2827 N Central AvePhoenix, AZ 85004602-354-8126https://www.technology-solved.com/phoenix-central-az/

To contact Bryan Windham, 2019 and 2020 of the Million Dollar Club, please contact:Computer Troubleshooters El Dorado114 E. Grove StEl Dorado, AR 71730870-875-1500https://www.technology-solved.com/el-dorado-ar/

About Computer TroubleshootersComputer Troubleshooters is the largest international network of franchise owners providing onsite computer services to small and medium-sized businesses and residential users. Computer Troubleshooters now has nearly 300 franchise locations worldwide in more than 8 countries. Computer Troubleshooters franchising opportunities provide continual training and support; access to exclusive vendor relationships; access to industry leading technical support and management services; access to office administration and billing systems; a local website with SEO services; plus active marketing campaigns that make it easy for customers to find the services of local franchises. The combination of these features makes Computer Troubleshooters the best choice for our clients and a great business opportunity for our franchisees.

For further information about Computer Troubleshooters, please contact:Kim WeinbergerNational Director of Business Development Computer ServicesComputer Troubleshooters and CPR Cell Phone Repair216-674-0645 x 662kim.weinberger@cpr-corporate.com

Share article on social media or email:

View post:
Jeff Joll receives Computer Troubleshooters Franchisee of the Year Award - PR Web

(2) Trump once suggested impeaching Obama after he was out of office – CNN

Former President Trump's lawyers are arguing now on the Senate floor against the constitutionality of the impeachment trial.

The lawyers who signed on to lead Trump's impeachment defense team bring a curious history of experience. David Schoen, a seasoned civil and criminal lawyer, and Bruce L. Castor, Jr, a well-known lawyer and the former Montgomery County, Pennsylvania, district attorney, are defending him in the trial.

The lawyers, both of whom have legal careers peppered with curiosities, joined Trump's team a day after five members of his defense left, effectively collapsing the team.

Trumps lawyers are tasked with devising a defense strategy for a former President who faces the impeachment charge of inciting a deadly insurrection at the US Capitol, something that if convicted could also result in him being barred from holding federal office ever again.

For Schoen, whose website says he "focuses primarily on the litigation of complex civil and criminal cases before trial and appellate courts," Trump is just the latest controversial figure his career has brought him to in recent years.

Schoen was on the team of lawyers representing Roger Stone, Trump's longtime friend and former adviser, in the appeal of his conviction related to issues Stone took with the jury. Stone dropped that appeal after the then-President commuted his prison sentence, but before Stone received a full presidential pardon for convictions, including lying to Congress to protect Trump.

Schoen, who holds a master of laws from Columbia University and a juris doctorate from Boston College, according to his biography, serves as chair of the American Bar Association's Criminal Justice Subcommittee of the Civil Rights Litigation Committee.

Castor, meanwhile, served as Montgomery County district attorney from 2000 to 2008, before serving two terms as the county commissioner, according to a release from Trump's office.

He was involved in at least one high-profile case as district attorney, when he declined in 2005 to prosecute Bill Cosby after Andrea Constand reported the actor had touched her inappropriately at his home in Montgomery County, citing "insufficient credible and admissible evidence."

Cosby was later tried and convicted in 2018 for drugging and sexually assaulting Constand at his home in 2004, despite the fact that Castor argued during a pre-trial hearing that he'd already committed the state to not prosecuting the actor.

Read more about the lawyers here.

Original post:
(2) Trump once suggested impeaching Obama after he was out of office - CNN

The Forces That Stopped Obamas Recovery Will Not Stop Bidens – New York Magazine

Photo: Tim Sloan/AFP via Getty Images

Joe Biden assumed the presidency confronting an economic crisis reminiscent of the one that faced him when he and Barack Obama took office 12 years earlier. But it is already apparent that the political atmosphere surrounding Biden is unrecognizable. He enjoys freedom of action and a presumptive legitimacy in tackling the crisis that had been denied the last Democratic presidency. Every actor around him the Republican opposition, business, the mainstream media, and Democrats in Congress are behaving differently. Its as if hes the president of a completely different country than the one that existed in 2009.

This is not because the present crisis is more severe. Just the opposite: The deepest and darkest moment of the contraction has passed, and the question before the economy now is how rapidly it can return to health. A dozen years ago, the economy was plunging so rapidly nobody could even measure the speed of the collapse, let alone discern a bottom.

Americans in 2009 had been conditioned to treat budget deficits as their greatest threat. This began when Ronald Reagan created the modern era of large deficits, which thrust Democrats into the role of fiscal stewards. In part this reflected economic conditions that were once very real. Inflation in the 1980s, while lower than the previous decade, remained high, and periodically threatened to spiral when the deficit peaked. Alan Greenspan informed incoming president Bill Clinton that his economy depended on persuading the bond market he had a serious plan to reduce the deficit, and he was not necessarily wrong interest rates did seem to threaten to choke off the economy.

The focus on deficits spread beyond Washington and Wall Street, becoming a national obsession. Ross Perot created a national populist movement by making deficits a symbol of national decline. The fantasy of who could cut through partisan rancor and solve this singular crisis was often reflected in popular culture. A 1992 Saturday Night Live skit imagined the Founding Fathers returning to the future through a time machine, telling the country, as we studied your problems, we kept coming back to one overriding concern: the crippling federal deficit. The 1993 movie Dave centered on Kevin Kline as an ordinary person who becomes president through a deus ex machina, and brings in his common-sense accountant friend to comb through the budget and find the necessary savings. A 2000 Simpsons episode, later made famous for obvious reasons, depicted Lisa Simpson growing up to become president, only to declare, Weve inherited quite a budget crunch from President Trump.

And so when Obama took office, the news media treated the deficit, not the greatest economic calamity since the Great Depression, as the primary crisis. If combined with the gigantic stimulus package of tax cuts and new spending that Obama is preparing, which could amount to nearly $800 billion over two years, the shortfall this year could hit $1.6 trillion, reported the New York Times on January 7, But Obama and Democratic leaders in Congress said they were more determined than ever to pass a stimulus package. Obamas desire to increase the deficit in the face of already-large deficits was frequently treated as completely perverse.

Republicans embraced the idea that deficit spending could only worsen the economic crisis. When Obama invited House Republicans to meet with him, 82-year-old Roscoe Bartlett became a brief sensation by instructing Obama he was there during Franklin Roosevelts New Deal, and government programs didnt work then. A deeply weird revisionist history of the New Deal by Amity Shlaes was held up by Republicans as proof positive that Bartletts youthful memories (he was 5 when Roosevelt took office) were correct.

Throughout most of Obamas presidency, reporters judged his success by a simple metric: Could he join with Republicans to forge a deal to reduce the deficit? The ends (deficit reduction) and the means (bipartisan cooperation) were linked together so tightly that journalists considered it almost axiomatic that if he could cooperate with Republicans, the deal would be over deficits. When Bob Woodward chronicled the failure of a deal to emerge in 2013, he lamented, They did not get that a genuine deal would send multiple messages to the world, establishing some economic certainty, laying the conditions for a burst of economic growth and providing evidence, sorely lacking for years, that Democrats and Republicans could work together for the common good. The endless demands that Obama spend more time drinking with Mitch McConnell or golfing with John Boehner reflected the press corps inability to imagine any other avenue for domestic success.

In the intervening years, the assumptions that produced this atmosphere have all collapsed one by one.

The rise of Donald Trump is the largest single cause of the transformation. It was obvious to some of us all along that Republican claims to have a passionate concern for fiscal probity were insincere. Trump has made it impossible to ignore. The beliefs that sincerely animated reporters and officials in Washington during the Obama era that the Tea Party was a reaction to debt levels, that Republican leaders were willing or able to deal with Obama were turned into a running joke by a Republican president who won the nomination in part because he never fooled himself into believing any of these things. Trumps ability to blow out the budget deficit and wantonly pick winners and losers without any shame or meaningful Republican blowback destroyed the whole premise.

Democrats in Congress also learned an important lesson from the Obama era. Many moderate Democrats shared a belief with the mainstream media that bipartisanship was both possible and necessary. Democrats in Congress squandered much of their time pursuing fruitless negotiations with Republicans, chasing a deal they were sure lay just around the corner. Only in retrospect did they realize that Republicans were stringing them along to allow opposition to build while they ran out the clock.

One of the biggest obstacles Obama faced in 2009 was the excessive confidence of his putative congressional allies that they could strike an agreement with Republicans. Bidens congressional allies have fewer illusions about the incentives of their Republican counterparts.

Economic thinking itself has changed in important ways over the last decade. Economists previously feared that the federal government floating trillions of dollars in additional debt would cause interest rates to rise. (Indeed, this seems like a straightforward application of supply and demand.) Instead, interest rates have failed to budge, eliminating the austerity pressure that exerted such a powerful impact in the 1980s and 1990s.

A 2010 paper by Kenneth Rogoff and Carmen Reinhardt estimated that once a countrys debt hit a threshold of 90 percent of its gross domestic product, its growth rate sharply fell. This finding, backed by unimpeachable sources, inspired a huge amount of civic and business lobbying to reduce the long-term debt. But in 2013, a graduate student found that its principle conclusion was based on simple errors.

Economists have likewise changed their view of unemployment. The Federal Reserve has historically tried to balance between unemployment and inflation, keeping interest rates at a level that would maintain a growth rate neither too fast nor too slow. But the evidence has grown increasingly clear that its calibrations have been off. The level of unemployment central bankers thought would be low enough to set off inflation has not made prices budge.

The Trump era produced the strongest evidence of all. In 2018 and 2019, unemployment dropped below what had been previously assumed to be full employment. And yet, contrary to theory, inflation did not rise. Indeed, unemployment just kept falling, until the pandemic artificially halted the recovery.

Many economists on the right as well as the left are eager to resume the experiment and find out just how low unemployment can actually be brought. The fears of hyperinflation that circulated freely during Obamas first term have been completely forgotten.

It is ironic that Trump created the conditions to allow Biden to succeed. First by exposing his party as disingenuous, then by disproving its economic nostrums, he set the stage for his successor to implement a smarter and better version of his experiment in running the economy hot.

The left has stewed for a dozen years over Obamas inability to secure more fiscal stimulus. And while he might perhaps have gotten a bit more out of Congress with more clever design, ultimately the most important constraints came from outside 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue. Obamas economic-recovery push came in an atmosphere of pure hysteria, in which media and business elites joined by many members of his own party believed the United States stood on the precipice of hyperinflation and a public-debt crisis, the resolution of which had willing partners across the aisle. All those myths now lay in tatters. After hard experience, the path to a fast recovery and an era of prosperity is now open for Biden.

Analysis and commentary on the latest political news from New York columnist Jonathan Chait.

Link:
The Forces That Stopped Obamas Recovery Will Not Stop Bidens - New York Magazine

The global quantum computing race has begun. What will it take to win it? – ZDNet

The UK is now facing a huge challenge: after having secured a top spot in the quantum race, retaining the country's status is going to require some serious stepping up.

National quantum programs and decade-long quantum strategies are increasingly being announced by governments around the world. And as countries unlock billions-worth of budgets, it is becoming clear that a furious competition is gradually unrolling. Nations want to make sure that they are the place-to-be when quantum technologies start showing some real-world value and the UK, for one, is keen to prove that it is a quantum hotspot in the making.

"We have a very successful program that is widely admired and emulated around the world," said Peter Knight, who sits on the strategic advisory for the UK's national quantum technology program (NQTP), as he provided a virtual update on the NQTP's performance so far.

Speaking at an online conference last month, Knight seemed confident. The UK, said the expert, in line with the objectives laid out in the program, is on track to become "the go-to place" for new quantum companies to start, and for established businesses to base all manners of innovative quantum activities.

SEE: Hiring Kit: Computer Hardware Engineer (TechRepublic Premium)

The UK is just over halfway through the NQTP, which saw its second five-year phase kick off at the end of 2019, and at the same timehit an impressive milestone of 1 billion ($1.37 billion) combined investment. This, the government claims, is letting the UK keep pace with competitors who are also taking interest in quantum namely, the US and China.

There is no doubt that the country has made strides in the field of quantum since the start of the NQTP. New ground-breaking research papers are popping up on a regular basis, and so are news reports of rounds of funding from promising quantum startups.

But with still just under half of the national quantum program to carry out, and despite the huge sums already invested, the UK is now facing a bigger challenge yet: after having chased a top spot in the quantum race, retaining the country's status in the face of ferocious competition is going to require some serious stepping up.

Clearly playing in favor of the UK is the country's early involvement in the field. The NQTP was announced as early as 2013, and started operating in 2014, with an initial 270 million ($370 million) budget. The vision laid out in the program includes creating a "quantum-enabled economy", in which the technology would significantly contribute to the UK's economy and attract both strong investment and global talent.

"The national program was one of the first to kick off," Andrew Fearnside, senior associate specializing in quantum technologies at intellectual property firm Mewburn Ellis, tells ZDNet. "There are increasingly more national programs emerging in other countries, but they are a good few years behind us. The fact that there has been this sustained and productive long-term government initiative is definitely attractive."

The EU's Quantum Technologies Flagship, in effect,only launched in 2018; some countries within the bloc,like France, started their own quantum roadmaps on top of the European initiative even later. Similarly, the National Quantum Initiative Act wassigned into law by the Trump administration but that was also in 2018, years into the UK's national quantum technology program.

Since it launched in 2014, there has been abundant evidence of the academic successes of the initial phase of the NQTP. In Birmingham, the Quantum Sensing Hub is developing new types of quantum-based magnetic sensors that could help diagnose brain and heart conditions, while the Quantum Metrology Institute leads the development of quantum atomic clocks. There are up to 160 research groups and universities registered across the UK withprograms that are linked to quantum technologies, working on projects ranging from the design of quantum algorithms to the creation of new standards and verification methods.

A much harder challenge, however, is to transform this strong scientific foundation into business value and as soon as the UK government announced the second phase of the NQTP at the end of 2019,a clear messageemerged: quantum technology needed to come out of the lab, thanks to increased private sector investment that would accelerate commercialization.

Some key initiatives followed. A national quantum computing center was established for academics to work alongside commercial partners such as financial services company Standard Chartered, "possibly with an eye on financial optimization problems," notes Fearnside, given the business'established interest in leveraging quantum technologies. A 10 million ($13 million) "Discovery" program alsolaunched a few months ago, bringing together five quantum computing companies, three universities and the UK's national physical laboratory all for the purpose of making quantum work for businesses.

The government's efforts have been, to an extent, rewarded. The quantum startup ecosystem is thriving in the UK, with companies like Riverlane or Cambridge Quantum Computing completing strong rounds of private financing. In total, up to 204 quantum-related businesses have been listed so far in the country.

But despite these encouraging results, the UK is still faced with a big problem. Bringing university-born innovation to the real worldhas always been a national challenge, and quantum is no exception. A 2018 report from the Science and Technology committee, in fact,gave an early warning of the stumbling blocksthat the NQTP might run into, and stressed the need for improved awareness across industry of the potential of quantum technologies.

The committee urged the government to start conveying the near-term benefits that quantum could provide to businesses something that according to the report, CEOs and company chairs in North America worryingly seem to realize a whole lot better.

It's been three years since the report was published, and things haven't changed much. Speaking at the same forum as the NQTP's Peter Knight, Ian West, a partner at consultancy firm KPMG, said that there remained a huge barrier to the widespread take-up of quantum technologies in the UK. "Some of our clients feel they don't understand the technology, or feel it's one for the academics only," he argued.

"We need that demand from businesses who will be the ultimate users of quantum technologies, to encourage more investment," West added. "We need to do much more to explain the near-term and medium-term use cases for business applications of quantum technologies."

SEE: BMW explores quantum computing to boost supply chain efficiencies

Without sufficient understanding of the technology, funding problems inevitably come. The difficulty of securing private money for quantum stands in stark contrast to the situation across the Atlantic, where investors have historically done a better job of spotting and growing successful technology companies. Add the deep pockets of tech giants such as Google, IBM or Microsoft, which are all pouring money into quantum research, and it is easy to see why North America might have better prospects when it comes to winning the quantum game.

In the worst of cases, this has led to US technology hubs hoovering up some of the best quantum brains in the UK. In 2019, for example, PsiQ, a promising startup that was founded at the University of Bristol with the objective of producing a commercial quantum computer, re-located to Silicon Valley. The movewas reported to be partly motivated by a lack of access to capital in Europe. It was a smart decision: according to the company's latest update, PsiQ hasnow raised $215 million (156 million) in VC funding.

Pointing to the example of PsiQ, Simon King, partner and deep tech investor at VC firm Octopus Ventures, explains that to compete against the US, the UK needs to up its game when it comes to assessing the startups that show promise, and making sure that they are injected with adequate cash.

"The US remains the biggest competitor, with a big concentration of universities and academics and the pedigree and culture of commercializing university research," King tells ZDNet. "Things are definitely moving in the right direction, but the UK and Europe still lag behind the US, where there is a deeper pool of capital and there are more investors willing to invest in game-changing, but long-term technology like quantum."

US-based private investors are only likely to increase funding for the quantum ecosystem in the coming years, and significant amounts of public money will be backing the technology too. The National Quantum Initiative Act that was signed in 2018 came with $1.2 billion (870 million) to be invested in quantum information science over the next five years; as more quantum companies flourish, the budget can be expected to expand even further.

Competition will be coming from other parts of the world as well. In addition to the European Commission's 1 billion ($1.20 billion) quantum flagship, EU countries are also spending liberally on the technology. Germany, in particular, has launched a 2 billion ($2.4 billion) funding program for the promotion of quantum technologies in the country, surpassing by far many of its competitors; but France, the Netherlands, and Switzerland are all increasingly trying to establish themselves as hubs for quantum startups and researchers.

SEE: Less is more: IBM achieves quantum computing simulation for new materials with fewer qubits

Little data is available to measure the scope of the commercialization of quantum technology in China, but the country has made no secret of its desire to secure a spot in the quantum race, too. The Chinese government has ramped up its spending on research and development, and the impact of that investment has already shown in the countryachieving some significant scientific breakthroughs in the field.

In the midst of this ever-more competitive landscape, whether the UK can effectively distinguish itself as the "go-to place" for quantum technologies remains to be seen. One thing is for certain: the country has laid some very strong groundwork to compete. "The UK has some genuinely world-class universities with some really brilliant academics, so while the objective is certainly ambitious, it's not out of the question," argues King.

But even top-notch researchers and some of the most exciting quantum startups might not cut it. The UK has positioned itself well from an early stage in the quantum race, but becoming a frontrunner was only one part of the job. Preserving the country's position for the coming years might prove to be the hardest challenge yet.

View original post here:
The global quantum computing race has begun. What will it take to win it? - ZDNet