Archive for November, 2020

For Thomas Searles, a passion for people and science at HBCUs and MIT – MIT News

When Thomas Searles was assigned a book report in the first grade, he initially had trouble choosing a topic. He really didnt like fiction books. After a bit of indecision, he chose to write his report on a book about Black astronauts. Though he didnt realize it at the time, his journey to becoming a physicist at MIT had just begun.

I looked in the book, and there was Ronald E. McNair, who happens to be an MIT alum, randomly; he got his PhD here, Searles says. And it said that he was a laser physicist. So, I said, Well, that's what I'm going to be, because I want to be an astronaut.

Searles is now a member of the 2020-21 Martin Luther King (MLK) Visiting Professors and Scholars Program cohort at MIT. Since 1995, the MLK Scholars Program has brought in a total of 67 visiting professors and 21 visiting scholars from across all academic disciplines. Individuals of any underrepresented minority group are eligible to apply, and scholars are selected for their contributions both to their fields and their potential contributions to MIT.

It's something that was always on my radar as a young Black scientist, Searles said. It was something that was on my five- to 10-year plan.

Searles is currently an associate professor in the Department of Physics at Howard University, a historically Black college and university (HBCU) located in Washington. There, he established a new research program in applied and materials physics. He is also the director of a new academic partnership between IBM and 13 other HBCUs called the IBM-HBCU Quantum Center.

Searles research career began as an undergraduate in mathematics and physics at Morehouse College, a HBCU in Atlanta. Before graduating in 2005, he worked in an optics lab, examining the properties of light and its interactions with matter.

A lot of us had an interest in optics, because that was the only experimental lab that we had at Morehouse at the time, Searles says. So naturally, I applied to graduate schools that were optics-related.

That interest led him to pursue his PhD in applied physics in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Rice University in Houston, Texas, from which he graduated. Before graduating in 2011, he studied light-matter interactions, and completed a thesis about the magneto-optical properties of carbon nanotubes, tiny cylinders comprised of a single layer of carbon atoms. Carbon nanotubes are extremely strong, lightweight, and electrically conductive, making them promising for a variety of applications.

In 2015, Searles started at Howard University. I wanted to go back and work at an HBCU. I thought of my experience working in the Morehouse optics lab and how they kind of shaped my experience, Searles says. So then I was like, What can I do that's different from everyone else that will also provide opportunities to a lot of Black students? So, I set out to start a terahertz experimental lab, knowing that it was going to be difficult. And it was difficult. But we were able to do it.

In the terahertz spectroscopy lab at Howard University, researchers work with matter that has a large wavelength, and a frequency between several hundred gigahertz and several terahertz. During the first so-called quantum age in the mid-1900s, silicon was the new, exciting material used to develop transistors. Now, researchers in fields like chemistry and physics are on the hunt for the next material to be a platform for a new generation of quantum technologies.

The primary goal is to study materials for new computers, making them either safer, faster, or more secure, Searles says. This whole idea of quantum computing is what we're focusing our lab on, moving towards this idea of quantum advantage.

Quantum computing relies upon the use of quantum materials which have unique electronic and magnetic properties to build faster, stronger, and more powerful computers. Such machines are likely to provide this quantum advantage for new developments in medicine, science, finance, chemistry, and many other fields.

In 2016, Searles met MIT associate professor of physics and Mitsui Career Development Professor in Contemporary Technology Joseph Checkelsky at an event through the National Science Foundation Center for Integrated Quantum Materials.

The idea was to try to find people that we wanted to collaborate and work with, Checkelsky says. And I think I even wrote down in my notepad Thomas' name and put a big underline that I should work with this guy. Searles says the best thing that can ever happen to a spectroscopist like himself is to find a crystal-growth person that provides samples, who you also really vibe with and like as a person. And that person for me has been Joe. The two have been collaborating ever since.

Checkelskys lab works to discover new crystalline materials that enable quantum phenomena. For instance, one material that has previously been of interest to Checkelsky is a kagome crystal lattice, a 2D arrangement of iron and tin molecules. Both Checkelsky and Searles are interested in applying a branch of mathematics called topology to solids, particularly semimetals.

One of the roles Thomas plays is to examine the optical properties of these new systems to understand how light interacts with quantum materials, Checkelsky says. Its not only fundamentally important, it can also be the bridge that connects to new technologies that interfaces light with quantum science.

Searles expertise on the optics side of the research enables him to identify which materials are ideal for further study, while Checkelskys group is able to synthesize materials with certain properties of interest.

It's a cycle of innovation where his lab knows how it can be tested and my lab knows how to generate the material, Checkelsky says. Each time we get through the cycle is another step toward answering questions in fundamental science that can also bring us to new platforms for quantum technology.

Checkelsky nominated Searles for the MLK Scholars Program in hopes of further expanding their academic partnership. He now serves as Searles host researcher through the program.

I hope to extend my collaboration with Joe to not only [explore] this condensed matter, experimental side of my group, but to expand this into Lincoln Laboratory and the quantum information portion that MIT has, Searles says. I think that's critical, research-wise.

In addition to their research goals, Searles and Checkelsky are excited to strengthen the general connection between MIT and Howard.

I think there are opportunities for Thomas to see, for example, the graduate school process in our department, Checkelsky says. Along the same lines, it is a great opportunity for MIT and our department to learn more how to connect to the people and science within HBCUs. It is a great chance for information to flow both ways.

Searles also hopes to encourage more HBCU students to pursue graduate study at MIT. The goal of increasing the number of qualified applicants [from HBCUs] I think that's something that I can measure metrically from the first year, Searles says. And if there's anything that I can do to help with that number, I think that would be awesome.

See the rest here:
For Thomas Searles, a passion for people and science at HBCUs and MIT - MIT News

Outlook on the AI Chipsets Global Market to 2025 – More than 83% of Global Chipsets Will be AI-equipped – PRNewswire

DUBLIN, Nov. 6, 2020 /PRNewswire/ -- The "AI Chipsets for Wireless Networks and Devices, Cloud and Next Generation Computing, IoT, and Big Data Analytics 2020 - 2025" report has been added to ResearchAndMarkets.com's offering.

This report evaluates leading market players across the AI chipsets ecosystem, technology strategies, and solution plans. This includes leveraging AI chipsets for support of various emerging and disintermediating technology areas such as edge computing, 5G, and blockchain systems. Additional areas addressed include AI support of emerging computing technologies including edge platforms and servers.

This report also assesses applications and service support scenarios for AI chipsets across almost all major industry verticals. The report provides forecasts for AI chipset hardware, embedded software, professional service, deployment platforms, and applications for every major industry vertical as well as regional and country forecasts for 2020 to 2025. The report also provides exclusive recommendations for stakeholders within the AI chipsets ecosystem.

The AI chipset marketplace is poised to transform the entire embedded system ecosystem with a multitude of AI capabilities such as deep machine learning, image detection, and many others. With 83% of all chipsets globally shipping AI-equipped, over 57% of all electronics will have some form of embedded intelligence by 2025. This will also be transformational for existing critical business functions such as identity management, authentication, and cybersecurity.

Multi-processor AI chipsets learn from the environment, users, and machines to uncover hidden patterns among data, predict actionable insights and perform actions based on specific situations. AI chipsets will become an integral part of both AI software/systems as well as critical support of any data-intensive operation as they drastically improve processing for various functions as well as enhance overall computing performance. This will be a boon for many aspects of ICT ranging from decision support and data analytics to product safety and system optimization.

Consumers will realize benefits indirectly through improved product and service performance such as device and cloud-based gaming. Enterprise and industrial users will benefit through general improvements in automated decision-making, especially in the areas of robotic process automation, decision support systems, and overall data management. AI chipsets will be particularly useful for business edge equipment for real-time data analytics and store versus processing decisions.

Select Report Findings:

Key Topics Covered:

1. Executive Summary

2. Research Overview2.1 Research Objectives2.2 Select Findings

3. AI Chipsets Introduction3.1 AI Chipsets3.1.1 Chipset Components3.1.2 General Purpose Applications3.2 AI Systems3.3 Market Dynamics Analysis3.4 AI Investments3.5 Competitive Market

4. Technologies, Solutions, and Markets4.1 Chipsets Technology and Products4.2 AI Technology4.2.1 Machine Learning4.2.2 Machine Learning APIs4.2.3 Deep Machine Learning4.2.4 Natural Language Processing4.2.5 Computer Vision4.2.6 Voice Recognition4.2.7 Context Awareness Computing4.2.8 Neural Networks4.2.9 Facial Recognition4.3 Deployment Platform4.4 IoT Sector4.5 Applications in Industry Verticals4.6 Regional Markets4.7 Value Chain4.8 5G Network and Edge Computing4.9 Cloud Computing and Data Analytics4.10 Industry 4.0 and Factory Automation4.11 Autonomous Networks4.12 Blockchain Networks4.13 Quantum Computing4.14 Machine Intelligence4.15 Nanoscale Technology4.16 Mobile Network Operators

5. Company Analysis5.1 NVIDIA Corporation5.2 IBM Corporation5.3 Intel Corporation5.4 Samsung Electronics Co Ltd.5.5 Microsoft Corporation5.6 Baidu Inc.5.7 Qualcomm Incorporated5.8 Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd.5.9 Fujitsu Ltd.5.10 Softbank Group Corp. (ARM Limited)5.11 Apple Inc.5.12 Amazon Inc. (AWS)5.13 SK Telecom5.14 Inbenta Technologies Inc.5.15 Microchip Technology Inc.5.16 Texas Instruments Inc.5.17 Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) Inc.5.18 XILINX Inc.5.19 Micron Technology5.20 AIBrain Inc.5.21 General Vision Inc.5.22 Sentient Technologies Holdings Limited5.23 Graphcore5.24 Analog Devices Inc.5.25 Cypress Semiconductor Corp5.26 Rohm Semiconductor5.27 Semtech Corporation5.28 NXP Semiconductors N.V.5.29 STMicroelectronics5.30 MediaTek Inc.5.31 Renesas Electronics Corporation5.32 ZTE Corporation5.33 NEC Corporation5.34 Broadcom Corporation5.35 Integrated Device Technology (IDT) Inc.5.36 Toshiba Corporation5.37 Adapteva Inc.5.38 Applied Materials Inc.5.39 Bitmain Technologies Inc.5.40 Cambricon Technologies Corporation Limited5.41 DeePhi Tech5.42 Gyrfalcon Technology Inc.5.43 Horizon Robotics5.44 Mythic5.45 Tenstorrent Inc.5.46 Wave Computing5.47 Mellanox Technologies5.48 Koniku5.49 Numenta Inc.5.50 Imagination Technologies Limited5.51 Synopsys Inc.5.52 SenseTime5.53 Marvell Technology Group Ltd.5.54 Cadence Design Systems Inc.5.55 Rockchip5.56 VeriSilicon Limited5.57 Knuedge Inc.5.58 KRTKL Inc.5.59 Shanghai Think-Force Electronic Technology Co. Ltd.5.60 SK Hynix Inc.5.61 Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited (TSMC)5.62 Alphabet (Google)5.63 Thinci5.64 LG Corporation5.65 SambaNova Systems5.66 Groq5.67 Kalray5.68 Facebook5.69 Almotive5.70 AnotherBrain5.71 BrainChip Holdings5.72 Cerebras Systems5.73 Chipintelli5.74 Tesla (DeepScale)5.75 Kneron5.76 NovuMind5.77 ThinkForce5.78 Vathys5.79 Nervana Systems5.80 Barefoot Networks5.81 Alibaba Group5.82 Megvii5.83 HPE5.84 Dell Inc. (Dell EMC)5.85 Western Digital5.86 Habana5.87 Nokia

6. AI Chipsets Market Analysis and Forecasts 2020 - 20256.1 Global AI Chipsets Market 2020 - 20256.1.1 Total Global Market Size 2020 - 20256.1.2 Market by Segment 2020 - 20256.1.3 Market by Deployment Platform 2020 - 20256.1.4 Market by Application 2020 - 20256.1.5 Market by Industry Vertical 2020 - 20256.1.6 Market by AI in Consumer, Enterprise, Industrial and Government 2020 - 20256.1.7 Market in 5G Networks 2020 - 20256.1.8 Market in Edge Computing Networks 2020 - 20256.1.9 Market in Cloud Computing 2020 - 20256.1.10 Market in Quantum Computing 2020 - 20256.1.11 Market in Big Data Analytics 2020 - 20256.1.12 Market in IoT 2020 - 20256.1.13 Market in Blockchain Networks 2020 - 20256.2 Regional AI Chipsets Market 2020 - 20256.2.1 Market by Region 2020 - 20256.2.1.1 North America Market 2020 - 20256.2.1.2 Europe Market 2020 - 20256.2.1.3 Asia Pacific Market 2020 - 20256.2.1.4 Middle East and Africa Market 2020 - 20256.2.1.5 Latin America Market 2020 - 20256.3 AI Chipsets Deployment Forecast 2020 - 20256.3.1 Total Global Deployment 2020 - 20256.3.2 Deployment by Segment 2020 - 20256.3.2.1 Deployment by Product 2020 - 20256.3.2.2 Deployment by Technology 2020 - 20256.3.2.3 Deployment by Processor Type 2020 - 20256.3.3 Deployment by Platform 2020 - 20256.3.3.1 Deployment by IoT Device 2020 - 20256.3.3.1.1 Deployment by Wearable Device 2020 - 20256.3.3.1.2 Deployment by Healthcare Device 2020 - 20256.3.3.1.3 Deployment by Smart Appliances 2020 - 20256.3.3.1.4 Deployment by Industrial Machines 2020 - 20256.3.3.1.5 Deployment by Entertainment Device 2020 - 20256.3.3.1.6 Deployment by Security Device 2020 - 20256.3.3.1.7 Deployment by Network Device 2020 - 20256.3.3.1.8 Deployment by Connected Vehicle Device 2020 - 20256.3.3.1.9 Deployment by Smart Grid Device 2020 - 20256.3.3.1.10 Deployment by Military Device 2020 - 20256.3.3.1.11 Deployment by Energy Management Device 2020 - 20256.3.3.1.12 Deployment by Agriculture Specific Device 2020 - 20256.3.3.2 Deployment by Non-IoT Device 2020 - 20256.3.3.3 Deployment by IoT "Things" 2020 - 20256.3.4 Deployment by AI Technology 2020 - 20256.3.4.1 Deployment by AI Technology Type 2020 - 20256.3.4.2 Deployment by Machine Learning Technology 2020 - 20256.3.5 Deployment by Application 2020 - 20256.3.6 Deployment by Industry Vertical 2020 - 20256.3.7 Deployment by Price Range 2020 - 20256.3.8 Deployment by Region 2020 - 20256.3.8.1 North America Deployment by Country 2020 - 20256.3.8.2 Europe Deployment by Country 2020 - 20256.3.8.3 Asia Pacific Deployment by Country 2020 - 20256.3.8.4 Middle East and Africa Deployment by Country 2020 - 20256.3.8.5 Latin America Deployment by Country 2020 - 2025

7. Conclusions and Recommendations7.1 Advertisers and Media Companies7.2 Artificial Intelligence Providers7.3 Automotive Companies7.4 Broadband Infrastructure Providers7.5 Communication Service Providers7.6 Computing Companies7.7 Data Analytics Providers7.8 Immersive Technology (AR, VR, and MR) Providers7.9 Networking Equipment Providers7.10 Networking Security Providers7.11 Semiconductor Companies7.12 IoT Suppliers and Service Providers7.13 Software Providers7.14 Smart City System Integrators7.15 Automation System Providers7.16 Social Media Companies7.17 Workplace Solution Providers7.18 Large Businesses, SMBs, and Governments7.19 Future Market Direction

Companies Mentioned

For more information about this report visit https://www.researchandmarkets.com/r/2p0bxd

Research and Markets also offers Custom Research services providing focused, comprehensive and tailored research.

Media Contact:

Research and Markets Laura Wood, Senior Manager [emailprotected]

For E.S.T Office Hours Call +1-917-300-0470 For U.S./CAN Toll Free Call +1-800-526-8630 For GMT Office Hours Call +353-1-416-8900

U.S. Fax: 646-607-1907 Fax (outside U.S.): +353-1-481-1716

SOURCE Research and Markets

http://www.researchandmarkets.com

Go here to see the original:
Outlook on the AI Chipsets Global Market to 2025 - More than 83% of Global Chipsets Will be AI-equipped - PRNewswire

The 2020 Election Results Look Like a Massive Rebuke of Socialism – Reason

Summarizing the key lessons that Democrats should take away from election results that were much less favorable than expected, Rep. Abigail Spanberger (DVa.) reportedly told fellow members of her caucus during a conference call on Thursday that they shouldn't say the word socialism "ever again."

This would be good policy advice, whether or not it's good political advice. But as it turns out, socialism islooking like a major political loser this election cycle, with the specter of it likely costing former Vice President Joe Biden his chance at winning Florida. Indeed, this could be a rough couple of years for progressives: A Biden presidency coupled with a Republican-controlled Senatean outcome that is far from certain, but gaining some degree of likelihoodwould make it almost impossible for Democrats to push through the structural changes (such as D.C. statehood or an expansion of the Supreme Court) that could allow the left to take power.

This is something of a reversal of fortunes. For democratic socialists, the 2020 election cycle began with great promise; the hard left had not one but two ardently progressive primary candidates in Sens. Elizabeth Warren (DMass.) and Bernie Sanders (IVt.), the latter of whom had shown auspicious resilience against Hillary Clinton in 2016. There had also been small, encouraging signs in the years between then and now: the surprise election of Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (DN.Y.) in 2018, the success of socialist magazines and podcasts, the increasing salience of issues like economic inequality and Medicare for All, the formation of "the Squad."

But neither Warren nor Sanders could overcome Biden, the candidate who had worked hardest to put serious distance between himself and the term socialist. If anything, Biden needed to work even harder at this, since President Donald Trump's reelection campaign was able to tie Democrats to Latin American socialism in the minds of some Florida voters, leading to a surprisingly good showing for Trump among Latinoand particularly Cubanvoters.

Progressives often operate under the assumption that their failure to win elections is a result of malfeasance: More democracy, more activism, and more turnout will produce the broad mandate they need to enact change. They also assume that an increasingly racially diverse electorate will override the white voters who don't support fundamental, revolutionary changes to the economy. But the 2020 results are casting doubt on both of these beliefs: Trump is on track to have the GOP's best showing among minorities in decades, and while he will indeed lose the popular vote to Biden, the unusually high turnout did not lend itself to any sort of blue wave.

Not all of the results are in yet, and it's possible that subsequent election-related developments could change the outlook for progressives. But a GOP-controlled Senate will kill any chances of big, lofty, leftist legislation. The Senate could vote down Biden's judicial picks, and they could thwart liberal Cabinet nominees. Warren's bid for Treasury Secretary will be dead in the water.

"The Biden presidency will be doomed to failure before it starts," writesNew Yorkmagazine's Eric Levitz, who correctly notes that progressives are on the brink of catastrophe.

Democrats are clearly unhappy with this result, and many blame the excesses of the left for putting them in such a position.

"Democrats' messaging is terrible; it doesn't resonate," Rep. Kurt Schrader (DOre.), a moderate Blue Dog Democrat, toldThe Washington Post. "When [voters] see the far left that gets all the news media attention, they get scared. They're very afraid that this will become a supernanny state, and their ability to do things on their own is going to be taken away."

Former Missouri Democratic Senator Claire McCaskill, now a commentator for MSNBC, told viewers on Wednesday she was worried that far-left positions on issues were scaring potential voters away. Her remarks drew a rebuke from Ocasio-Cortez, who said McCaskill's loss in 2016 means she's no expert on winning elections. (McCaskill might have responded that AOC's own victory in an inner-city House district hardly confers a great deal of political expertise.)

Even some progressives think it's in the party's best interest to at the very least stop using the wordsocialism.

"I think Republicans did get some traction trying to scare people on this 'socialist narrative,'" Rep. Jared Huffman (DCalif.), a member of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, told The Washington Post. "What's the point of embracing a phrase like that?"

If a large number of Democrats actually absorbed this message, it would be icing on the cake. Right now, it appears that some of the worst impulses of both parties have been checked, and the next administration will take office with neither a mandate nor an ability to enact transformational economic policy changes.

Go here to see the original:
The 2020 Election Results Look Like a Massive Rebuke of Socialism - Reason

What Democrats Should Learn From the Spate of Socialist Wins on Election Day – In These Times

While many had hoped that Election Day would result in asweeping rebuke of Trump and Trumpism, neither apandemic nor an economic recession were enough to deliver an overwhelming rejection. And although its looking likely that Biden will eke out avictory, the 2020 election was in many ways abust for the Democratic Party, which lost seats in the House and most likely did not win amajority in theSenate.

But democratic socialism, popularized by near-presidential nominee Bernie Sanders (IVt.), had amuch better night. The Democratic Socialists of America (DSA), an organization that boasts nearly 80,000 members nationwide, endorsed 29 candidates and 11 ballot initiatives, winning 20 and 8respectively. There are now democratic socialist caucuses in 15 statehouses, including Montana. (Disclosure: Iam anationally elected leader of the organization; Isit on the Democratic Socialist LaborCommission.)

DSAs victories, both in the primaries and the general election, have rolled in as pundits and pollsters decry socialism as polarizing and raise fears that socialist candidates will end up backfiring and getting Republicans elected. Sanders supposed lack of electability was one of the most commonly used arguments against him in the primary. His primary opponents and prominent writers like Jonathan Chait claimed that the vast majority of Americans wouldnt vote for asocialist, and that there was no way he could defeatTrump.

While theres no real way to know for certain if thats true, it is clear that centrist Democrats arent necessarily shoo-ins themselves. Democrat Jon Ossoff, who lost acongressional special election in 2017, looks like he will also lose this cycles Senate race in Georgia. Democrat Sara Gideon, who raised $70 million to run against Republican Senator Susan Collins in Maine, has conceded, and it looks like Democrat Cal Cunningham will also lose his run for Senate in North Carolina. Amy McGrath, who ran as apro-Trump Democrat, raised nearly $90 million and still lost to Republican Senator Mitch McConnell. The list goes on and on. Even Joe Biden, who seems set to be our next president, often spoke more about beating Trump than any policies he would enact once inoffice.

Plenty of progressive candidates also lost, but most candidates nationally endorsed by DSA sailed through. And while its true that many of them had tough primary battles and less difficult elections on Tuesday, they still won as DSA members. All four members of The Squada progressive bloc in Congress that includes Democratic Reps. Rashida Tlaib (Mich.), Ilhan Omar (Minn.), Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (N.Y.) and Ayanna Pressley (Mass.)were reelected to the House. (Tlaib and Ocasio-Cortez are DSA members and endorsed by the organization.) Progressives also added two more DSA-endorsed members to their squad: Democratic Rep.-elect Jamaal Bowman in New York, and Democratic Rep.-elect Cori Bush, the first ever Black Congresswoman inMissouri.

Although the current iteration of DSA has been around since the early 1980s, the organization only became politically relevant during Sanders first presidential campaign in 2015, and exploded when Trump was elected. Five years is avery short period of time to have helped elect City Council members, state senators and representatives, and members of Congress all across the country. According to a2018 Reuters survey, 70% of Americans support anational health care plandue to Sanders popularization of the universal healthcare program and to the organizing and canvassing DSA chapters, along with other organizations like National Nurses United, have done around thelegislation.

DSA-backed candidates succeed for afew main reasons: They campaign on actual policies, have avision of how to govern, and dont just depend on the fact that theyre not Republicans. These policies include Medicare for All, aGreen New Deal and aJobs Guaranteeprograms that would improve the quality of life for working people all over this country. And because policies they support are so popular and inspiring, DSA-backed candidates attract dedicated canvassers and organizers, willing to spend nights and weekends knocking doors and making calls to get themelected.

Now, thanks to DSA members across the country, there is asocialist in Austin City Council and in both the Rhode Island and Montana State Houses. In Pennsylvania, there are three socialists who are almost certainly headed to the legislature in Harrisburg. Socialists in Boulder, Colorado worked alongside the ACLU to win aballot measure that guarantees no eviction without representation, and DSA members partnered with the labor unions AFSCME and SEIU to pass Preschool for All in Multnomah County, Oregon. And in both Florida and Portland, Maine, ballot initiatives for a $15 minimum wagepassed.

While its clear that most DSA victories have been in big cities or more liberal states thus far, its important that we dont discount the incredible organizing happening in the South and in rural areas. (Marquita Bradshaw ran aDSA-backed campaign for Senate in Tennessee but lost; Kim Roney, endorsed by her DSA chapter, won aseat on the Asheville CityCouncil.)

And while the Democratic party is loath to give DSA any encouragement, DSA member Tlaib may have helped to secure Bidens victory in Michigan by helping to massively increase voter turnout from 2016. DSAs ideology, focused on asociety that works for all of us instead of the wealthy few, is far more inspiring to young and working people than someone who is running for office just because theyre not Trump. It might take the Democratic Party time to realize that (or perhaps it never will), but to the average person, political conditions are changing fastand DSA is playing acritical role in thattransformation.

As a5013 nonprofit publication, In These Times does not oppose or endorse candidates for politicaloffice.

Read the original here:
What Democrats Should Learn From the Spate of Socialist Wins on Election Day - In These Times

CANO-SANTIAGO: Fascism is a more legitimate threat to American democracy than socialism – University of Virginia The Cavalier Daily

Albania, Brazil, Chile, Cuba, Greece these are only a few counties where the United States has supported fascist authoritarian governments in order to combat communism. Anti-communist sentiments continue to reverberate in American politics. Today, the political theory of socialism is under siege as some fear a larger central government and loss of economic freedoms. Under democratic socialism, citizens collectively own and distribute resources through a democratically elected government. In America, democratic socialism is popularized as simply socialism.

While Republicans politicians may claim that this idea is very popular amongst American liberals, this theory is not actually widely supported across America. Contrastingly, fascism and its many characteristics, including high militarization and hypernationalism, pose a greater threat to American democracy than socialism. Although we are not likely to see the emergence of a socialist or fascist government in the present age, we have already witnessed the seeds of fascism in American politics.

We must be aware of how fascism arose in the past to understand why fascism is more relevant than ever. In the 1930s in Western Europe, fascism arose from the ashes of economic collapse and imminent war. These are pre-conditions for government dependency as a solution, or disillusion with the current government. America is currently experiencing these conditions following a pandemic and economic collapse. Whether Americans will simply demand a government solution or a new government structure and what the structure would look like remains in contention.

Despite defeating fascist powers during World War II, there is a disturbing resurgence of fascist rhetoric in America ignited by President Donald Trump. To preface, many experts agree Trump is not a fascist. Rather, some political scientists prefer the terms populist or kleptocrat. Regardless, the need to even clarify his ideological alignment is concerning. The danger lies in how the Trump administration has embraced the semblance of fascism in speech and policy. For example, Trump exudes ultranationalism in speeches and has dismissed political dissidents. Some Democrats even claim Trump attempted to suppress political opposition by withholding funds from the U.S. Postal Service during an election cycle heavily reliant on mail-in voting.

These examples are distressing, however perhaps not as distressing as the infamous Executive Order 13769 or Trumps Muslim Ban. Within fascist ideology, there is often a disdain for human rights, and this order was specifically condemned by the United Nations as a human rights violation. The disregard and outright violation of human rights should concern all Americans and place the limits of democracy into question. We must consider whether weve reached the boundaries of representative democracy or if America has become desensitized to fascism. Especially, if the NO BAN act the bill created in opposition and as a response to the executive order dies in the Senate.

Conversely, socialism is not nearly as prevalent in current American politics. Historically, the Great Depression led many Americans to become disenchanted with capitalism, and under New Deal legislation, President Franklin Roosevelt passed several socialist-like policies such as social security. But in recent decades, weve seen the increasing resistance against socialist reforms from both moderate Democrats and Republicans. This trend, along with an anti-communist past, suggests that Americans may not accept socialism as a solution.

America has a complicated and often violent political history of militarism, imperialism, colonialism and nationalism. However, America has repeatedly demonized communism on American soil with the First Red Scare of 1919 and the McCarthy trials of the 1950s. Globally, America enacted military interventions and staged coup d'tats throughout and after the Cold War. Simultaneoulsy, America supported anti-communist militant dictators and regimes that perpetuated human rights abuses. If history is any indicator of the future, the American populace remains vehemently opposed or at least resistant to socialism. With the selection of former Vice President Joe Biden as the democratic nominee as opposed to Senator Bernie Sanders, it has become clear that even Democrats are not ready for a socialist leader. Despite the current trend of a rising population of young voters supporting socialism being a valid concern, there is subsequently a trend of electing older and older presidents, and opposition to socialism often increases with age.

In addition to the resistance of socialism among Democractic voters, there is even less support among politicians in Congress. Implementation of American socialism would require the unification of progressives and moderates, as well as the agreement of many Republicans. This is not likely to occur, at the very least, within the next four years. Additionally, progressive Democrats comprise a small fraction of Congress. Most are moderate Democrats who do not advocate for socialism, only agreeing with certain policies. The progressive agenda, including universal healthcare and the Green New Deal, continue to face resistance from moderate Democrats. Therefore, it is unlikely Congress would fully support truly socialist policies such as worker control.

Whether Trump wins the election or not, he has pushed the boundaries of democracy for himself while retracting it for many citizens. Trumps maneuvering of political roadblocks and what little power the opposition was able to exercise is disturbing and sets a precedent for future presidents. We, as the American people, must eliminate signs of fascism in its stead. We must protect the rights of minority groups, of women and of political opposition. As evidenced by history, fascism will not go away quietly. What has impeded the rise of fascist principles have been social movements led by the people. As citizens, as voters and as the American people, we have a moral obligation to squash fascism. We must extend the boundaries of our representative democracy, pushing against the roadblocks imposed by bureaucracy and partisan divide. We must be unafraid of change, unafraid of justice and unafraid of reform for the prosperity of current and future generations.

Yssis Cano-Santiago is a Viewpoint Writer for The Cavalier Daily. She can be reached at opinion@cavalierdaily.com

The opinions expressed in this column are not necessarily those of The Cavalier Daily. Columns represent the views of the authors alone.

Read the rest here:
CANO-SANTIAGO: Fascism is a more legitimate threat to American democracy than socialism - University of Virginia The Cavalier Daily