Mediaboss Marketing

As the electoral drama unfolded on the evening of November 3, the nation held its breath. Civil society groups prepared for turmoil, journalists for rapid response and tech companies to stem the spread of disinformation.

In the early hours of the morning, the networked factions that back President Donald TrumpDonald John TrumpFeds charge Staten Island man over threat to Schumer, FBI Pence cancels vacation in Florida: report Romney shoots down serving in Biden Cabinet MORE disparate groups united by their support of the president applauded his premature declaration of victory. Some turned to conspiracy theorists, operating in hives online, to make sense of the unfolding turmoil. Then they amplified the misinformation created in these spaces.

One group associated with such conspiracy theories is QAnon, which has contributed to the spread of misinformation in the 2020 election. The QAnon movement is centered around an individual (or group), referred to as Q, who claims to be part of a secret U.S. intelligence operation, disseminating esoteric propaganda to encourage support for Trumps imaginary crusade against forces of the so-called deep state. It originated from the 4chan, migrated to 8chan, then found a home on 8kun, which are message boards designed to share memes and anime not foster extremism. But their characteristics made them attractive homes for groups ranging from the hacktivistAnonymous collective, the reactionary Gamergate movement to white supremacist terror. They also have been a home for anti-democratic speech and celebrating political violence.

The growth of the QAnon conspiracy is the work of media manipulation by a small group of motivated actors, who move the storyline along across networked platforms. Like networked social movements that have used the internet as an advocacy platform, QAnon followers have managed to create a resilient cross-platform ecosystem of content and influencers that has shuttled misinformation across its various hubs for the last three years. Eventually Trump, who QAnon followers largely support, acknowledged and tacitly defended the conspiracy. As 2020 has shown us, political representation is on the horizon several Q candidates were on ballots across the country, including Marjorie Greene, who won a seat in the House, and Sen. Kelly Loeffler (R-Ga.), who is facing a runoff election to retain her seat in the U.S. Senate.

In 2020, the limited data we have from polling and critical reporting suggests millions are now aware of and may be on board with this movement. QAnon has become a fully networked conspiracy complex with numerous entry points for new followers, such as breaking news events, celebrity gossip and political intrigue. The movement uses pseudonymity to avoid attribution on social media, distributed amplification to quickly spread disinformation and fostered by fringe alt tech platforms like 8kun and Gab. Sheltered by these platforms known to harbor extremist groups, QAnon punches well above its weight, affecting our media, democratic institutions and public health.

While QAnon is not the alt-right, both movements grew in the same places. QAnon first came to popular attention when its supporters became visible at Trump rallies, and it spread globally during COVID-19 lockdowns. Steeped in ancient antisemitic tropes, QAnon members engage in misguided research, networked harassment of politicians and blind support for Trump. They are not the originators of these conspiracy theories, but the amplifiers often look to Trump himself for tacit recognition, and they rely on social media to grow their ranks.

Social institutions around the world are struggling with anti-democratic movements weaponizing social media. A few people can rapidly deploy disinformation across networks to deadly results QAnon was initially spread by three conspiracy influencers before it was taken up on large platforms. This network of influence is much like fandoms, and mimics the form of activist groups. We see how these methods were used to deadly effect by white nationalists.

After Charlottesville in 2017, platforms finally removed many of the extremists who used their systems to organize the deadly Unite the Right Rally. QAnon, unlike the alt-right before it, is not focused on ethnonationalism, but rather the acceleration of civic decay in the form of political and medical disinformation, including vaccine hesitancy. While the vast majority of QAnon influencers and believers do not advocate violence, some have taken matters into their own hands.

Just as QAnon co-opted the fight against human trafficking with the #savethechildren hashtag, the movement isnt bound to the 2020 elections. On their dock now is Agenda 21, the belief global leaders are plotting a depopulation genocide to favor elites.

How are platforms responsible

The manipulation of social media by unknown actors fundamentally disrupts democratic communication. This lack of identity leads to lack of attribution, leaving our political communication in the so-called new public square of social media vulnerable to both domestic and foreign interference. As power and wealth is consolidated around these platforms, they show us time and time again they are unable to successfully mitigate these campaigns. Now, as we see the impact on electoral politics, we must consider the true cost of disinformation and brace for its continual impact on our democractic institutions long past the elections. Internal leaks from facebook suggest the movement was allowed to grow, unfettered, for far too long despite internal concern.

In the chaos that exists between breaking news and verified information, disinformation thrives. Most recently, two individuals associated with the QAnon movement were arrested in Philadelphia for an alleged plot to attack the site of ballot counting. As liberals call for regulation, and conservatives rally around the abolition of Section 230, which governs liability on platforms, we cannot lose sight of what is at stake. Coalitions, like Change the Terms, have long worked to hold platforms accountable by creating model policies on hate speech. While debates about content moderation are about QAnon and Trump right now, it will not always be. The enduring influence of QAnon on political communication is a symptom of how social media platforms remain unable to adapt to evolving use cases, and the only way to counter it is to recalibrate how platforms moderate content, especially conspiracy and medical misinformation.

Brian Friedberg is a senior researcher of the Technology and Social Change Research Project at the Shorenstein Center on Media, Politics and Public Policy at Harvard Kennedy School. Merging academic methods and Open Source Intelligence techniques, he is an investigative ethnographer, focusing on the impacts alternative media, anonymous communities and unpopular cultures have on political communication and organization.

See the rest here:
QAnon proves internet companies aren't up to the task of defending democracy | TheHill - The Hill

Opponents of an Auckland art exhibition which featured neo-Nazi flags and symbols of white nationalism have received an apology from one of the exhibition's co-facilitators, but say it doesn't go far enough.

The exhibition by Mercy Pictures gallery closed last week, but has come under intense scrutiny by locals and activist group Tmaki Anti-Fascist Action who believe the display, which did not include context or justification, was deeply hurtful.

In a statement, a spokesperson for the group said many of the images used were clearly symbols of oppression, disguised as art.

"We were profoundly troubled by its extensive and uncritical use of neo-Nazi symbols, which is a form of platforming their ideology. We've found this especially frustrating when we and other community groups have put in so much effort to deplatform fascists before and following the Christchurch massacre," they said.

"In addition, we were deeply concerned that the exhibition's introduction was written by British transphobe Nina Power who has also collaborated with the alt-right, as a form of platforming her transphobic and alt-right ideology."

The group was also concerned that neo-Nazi symbols were displayed alongside the Tino Rangatiratanga and Ngi Thoe flags, without permission from tangata whenua.

"I would like to sincerely apologise for the harm and re-traumatisation brought about by the exhibition I played a part in putting together ... I deeply regret the way Mercy Pictures has responded to criticism and the pain that this show has bought about. It was irresponsible of me to assume these symbols and our action in displaying could deny their meanings and histories to extended communities," he said in an open letter.

"I regret in the strongest way possible the display of images and symbols related to terrible violence inflicted upon marginalised communities in the name of art. I recognise now this was a form of platforming fascist symbols. I apologise whole-heartedly for any detraction from the strength, mana and resilience of those people and for any pain that the exhibition caused them."

He also acknowledged that he would not work with Nina Power in the future, and said he would meet with the communities he had harmed face-to-face.

An open letter is circulating online to condemn the exhibition, and demand an apology from the entire company.

The letter also calls for the company to refuse to work with Nina Power in the future, no longer platform fascist and other far-right figures, and to apologise to tangata whenua for displaying their flags without permission.

Mercy Pictures is expected to release a statement.

See more here:
'We have put in so much effort to deplatform fascists before and following the Christchurch massacre' - Otago Daily Times

For many years, social media firms like Facebook (NASDAQ:FB) and Twitter (NYSE:TWTR) courted controversy over accusations that they deliberately censor or otherwise stymie conservative and right-wing voices. In fairness, I can appreciate why big tech firms have a vested interest in cleaning up their content. Frankly, bigotry is bad for business. But this years election cycle has only ramped up contentions over content arbitration, clouding the narrative for FB stock.

Source: Ink Drop / Shutterstock.com

As you know, President Donald Trump garnered notoriety for his constant criticism of fake news and mainstream media suppression of conservative ideologies. Moreover, Republicans havent been messing around, leveling all kinds of accusations against big tech, putting the sectors executives on the hot seat. Now, the common charge is that the underlying business model of FB stock violates in spirit the First Amendment.

I say in spirit because the First Amendment only applies to the government restricting free speech, not private corporations. And before you send me hate mail, please note that Im using private in the sense that these companies are not government entities. I fully realize that Facebook is a publicly traded company.

Essentially, then, the argument is that social media firms are using a constitutional technicality to censor conservative ideas. But if the overall impact results in free speech suppression, wouldnt that essentially be a constitutional violation? Because if were being intellectually honest, social media firms today have unfathomable influence in directing the national discourse.

On the other hand, Im not really sure if conservatives will be able to win the war against big tech, which may seem to bode well for FB stock. Heres the deal nothing is stopping Republican voters from creating their own Facebook or Twitter.

For instance, the alt-right (you can look this up yourself, Im not going to give these organizations oxygen) offers dating websites for white people only. While this notion sounds like something out of the Third Reich, the U.S. government cannot prevent far-right wing organizations from creating a race-based dating site.

Since the opportunity exists for conservatives to create their own platforms, the First Amendment ruckus probably wont work. Still, censorship is probably not in Facebooks or big techs interest and heres why.

In recent years, two stories piqued my interest. First, Tracy Jones article about his challenges rearing his biracial daughter in Japan, and second, the death of Christian missionary John Allen Chau at the North Sentinel Island. I found both narratives to be heartbreaking. But there are also two sides to every story.

Underlining these two seemingly disparate topics is the idea that the American foreigner has the right to assume that their permanent presence is welcome in a land not their own. In Chaus case, the indigenous Sentinelese tribe made it abundantly clear that they did not want the Gospel message. With Jones, some Japanese made it clear (in a far nicer way than the Sentinelese) that he was not appreciated.

Mainstream media coverage was generally sympathetic toward the Sentinelese. Though the indigenous tribe murdered Chau, there was an inherent risk of spreading disease to an uncontacted people group. Further, the Sentinelese expressed their displeasure at every attempt made at contact.

Similarly, the Japanese would probably continue embracing their homogeneity and nationalism had it not been for U.S. Navy Commodore Matthew Perry. For Japan, diversity of ideas and eventually people came at the threat of annihilation.

But the raging hypocrisy is that the Sentinelese murdered Chau, whose only crime was to preach salvation through Jesus Christ. Im sorry folks but thats not worthy of a death sentence; you can just say, no thanks! Yet the media emphasizes that ultimately, the Sentinelese have the right to protect their heritage at any cost.

However, the mainstream media has made it clear that the Japanese do not have that same right. Here, I am deeply troubled when Americans go to foreign countries to promote American-style virtue signaling. I mean, we wouldnt like it if Japanese commentators came to America and called us a bunch of gun-loving loons.

You know what wed say? Our guns, our business, go fly a kite. But in turn, dont the Japanese have the right to say the same thing about race relations in Japan?

But by censoring counterarguments and opposition speech on the faulty, reactionary notion of racism, only one side of the narrative is broadcasted. That feeds into deep resentment, contributing to characters like Donald Trump becoming leaders of the free world. And thats why capricious censorship of any conservative idea, no matter how well-reasoned, may be unfavorable for FB stock. It not only leads to blowback in the worst possible way but its bad for business (just like outright bigotry and racism is bad for business).

Youre losing an audience that is actually much more vocal and voluminous than coastal liberal elites assume. Just look at how close Trump came to winning reelection, even with fake ballots.

I like to consider myself a world traveler, although I havent had much time to do so in recent years. Still, I fondly remember my very brief time in Slovakia.

I was in a rundown part of the country. Honestly, the place looked like a warzone. And scrabbled all over the walls were the numbers 14/88. Thats code for if youre not white, you better run.

Did I find this offensive? Of course! But at the same time, I didnt run around to every Slovak and demand that they accept me. Look, its a white country and they want to keep it that way. Who am I, a foreigner, to demand they accept diversity with open arms?

I tell you this story because racial diversity is not a moral virtue. Its merely a choice: some people embrace it, but others do not. Whats wrong is to assume that those who dont embrace diversity which to be clear is far different from racism or fighting words are somehow morally flawed and must either be punished or censored.

Thats not the American way. And I would argue that its probably not good for FB stock. Again, youre denying voices that have every right to speak. Further, these voices often have hefty wallets. While Facebook can censor, it doesnt necessarily mean that it should.

On the date of publication, Josh Enomoto did not have (either directly or indirectly) any positions in the securities mentioned in this article.

A former senior business analyst for Sony Electronics, Josh Enomoto has helped broker major contracts with Fortune Global 500 companies. Over the past several years, he has delivered unique, critical insights for the investment markets, as well as various other industries including legal, construction management, and healthcare.

See original here:
Facebook Can Censor But Heres Why It Shouldnt - InvestorPlace

We can have Rome again if you break enough BMW windows. -Mike Ma, Harassment Architecture

And finally, the political machinations of the two great tribes slowly spins to a halt America has a president. On Saturday, Joe Biden declared victory after presumably taking Pennsylvania, a crucial swing state in the race.

This means, of course, that I was wrong not by a little bit, but by a lot. By multiple states, in fact. I messed up Arizona, and most importantly, Philadelphia, and that was my downfall. I wont dwell on it publicly, except to say that things were very, very close. Minute adjustments over a long enough timeline can lead to massive changes in the whole, and at the very least, I was close. Close enough for government work, as my dad says, and ironically, this was some of the most important government work that you can be wrong about. And thats, Gump-like, all I have to say about that.

America has always been shaped by inflections points, by moments in time weve made hard decisions about who we are what we want to be, Biden said in his victory speech in Wilmington, Delaware. There was an overwhelming call for a return to normalcy in Bidens speech, something that was echoed in his demands for bipartisanship among both camps Trump and Biden supporters.

Just like that, a race that had stretched into the wee hours of the night with little consensus, and allegations of cheating on both sides, was over. Joseph Robinette Biden, a man with the middle name of a fancy French boy, is the 46th president of the United States. Hes taking office in the middle of a pandemic. There are foreign enemies on both sides amassing power and baying for blood. Hes now in charge of running a country where two political parties have split Americans into factions, each focused on absolute annihilation of the other.

Right-wingers want Biden-voters crucified, their blood watering the tree of liberty or something. Left-wingers want Trump-voters imprisoned in some techno-hell a self-righteous I Have No Mouth and I Must Scream. Harlan Ellison may be spinning in his grave at this very moment, but nevertheless, I persist, to paraphrase the noxious lexicon of Elizabeth Warrens ill-fated campaign.

What a horrendous sh*tshow its almost enough to make one not believe in the integrity of elections anymore. Accusations of cheating continue to rock the airwaves, and Trumps refusal to officially accept the results only gives credence to conspiracists, hell-bent on finding evidence to support ballot-trashing or forging.

There must be some kind of way out of here, said the joker to the thief, theres too much confusion, I cant get no relief.-Bob Dylan, All Along the Watchtower

What a profoundly stupid world. How deeply weve sipped from the cup of neoliberalism that Joe Biden, hey-jacking his way into senility, seems to be Clark Kent reincarnated. Establishment Dems creamed their collective jeans at Bidens win, calling it a win for normalcy. Baudrillard was right this is a pure simulacrum, with no relationship to any reality whatsoever.

The fundamental willingness for Biden voters to accept this profoundly stupid, self-serving candidate on the grounds that hell bring normalcy back to the White House simply illustrates the fantasy theyve deluded themselves into believing.

Not to be black pilled on main, to borrow the 4chan parlance, but the political situation in which weve found ourselves embroiled cant be solved by electing someone who embodies the establishment in his every action. The DNC threw unique, progressive candidates (like Bernie Sanders, Andrew Yang and Tulsi Gabbard) under the bus to advance the careers of establishment libs like Pete Buttigieg (who Alfred E Neumann-ed himself into abysmal poll numbers), Elizabeth Warren (who eventually shot herself in the foot with a 23andMe test) and yes, like Joe Biden, whos been part of the establishment for his 47-year political career.

Even Bidens progressive policies accomplish nothing and in fact, may dig America into a deeper hole. His support for such deeply flawed policies as the Paris Climate Accords will cripple us economically, and solve nothing in terms of climate. His support for the Affordable Care Act is essentially a farce healthcare will stay, as it always has, expensive and inaccessible for most Americans. Taxes are going to skyrocket for middle-class Americans, with little perceived benefit.

This is to say nothing of his VP, a woman who embodies neoliberal transparency. Kamala Harris, the first Black female vice president, is this token figure for Dems to wave around Weve got a minority candidate, and everything is right with the world!

Its all simulacrum, and Harriss fascist prosecutorial history doesnt matter to these people. What matters is appearance, the concept of being progressive without actually taking steps to make that happen. Identity politics has fractured the political paradigm, degrading discourse and ensuring that nothing will ever really change. The military commander drone-striking an Iraqi village may use they/them pronouns, but the white phosphorus will still be white phosphorus.

With full clarity, I mean every word of what Ive said, in whatever context youve interpreted it. If you take this as the rantings of some caffeine-crazed armchair revolutionary, go ahead. If you assume this is the manifesto of some profoundly disturbed alt-right Proud Boy, take it as that. If you think I should see someone or be on some kind of medication, youre probably right.

Regardless, everything Ive said here is true. It was on everyones lips Tyler and I just gave it a name, in the words of Palahniuk. Biden is president, and to you, that may mean the lesser of the two evils took office but in politics, there is no lesser evil. Theres only evil, in all its octopus-like, super-PAC forms.

To trudge to the polls every four years in the hopes that the lesser evil gets elected is this profoundly depressing, degrading facet of our political machine, that the party elites hope no one ever questions or challenges. If you can frame your dark-magic, dark-money ghoul as the shining hope for American democracy, in contrast with Baphomet himself Orange Man Bad f*ck, you can get away with anything!

Drone strike a Yemeni wedding? In the name of democracy. Pass a crime bill jailing thousands of Black men, for tenuous connections to non-violent drug crimes? As long as weve got a gay mayor in South Bend!

You see, the Democrat, in his many forms, doesnt care about results. He cares about image, and that, friends, is the dividing line that determines how the American political machinations will roll and will continue to roll until Gabriel blows his horn, or Hunter S. rises from his grave or Henry Kissinger croaks his last.

By the way, none of this is a tacit endorsement of Trump by any means. Many of the problems with the 46th president are exhibited by the 45th as well, with significantly less slick political coaching. To argue, however, that Biden is this incredible improvement on the Donald, is a view so divorced from reality that its almost laughable. Meet the new boss, same as the old boss, sings The Who.

Its been an eventful four months since I began this column, and I like to think Ive provided some kind of new voice in the political sphere. Its debatable as to whether I missed anything important if Id had the time and energy, I would have taken a closer look at the Senate races, maybe, or talked a little about Washingtons gubernatorial race. Whatever. It doesnt matter at this point.

The point of political writing is to try to put some sense on what is functionally a nonsensical business. You can spend billions to try to predict the stock market, or flip a coin for millennia and never get above 50 percent accuracy, but all of those pointless activities would get you closer to an accurate end product than political predictions.

A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky, dangerous animals and you know it, Tommy Lee Jones said in Men in Black. Say what you will about the directorial prowess of Barry Sonnenfeld (and given Wild Wild West and Nine Lives, Ill probably tend to agree with you), but that quote sticks in your craw for a reason. Politics is Hollywood for ugly people, the saying goes. In politics, objective good is a byproduct, and certainly not something to be strived for.

I would hope that I havent ruined any potential shot at a career in these columns (though a position in Pete Buttigiegs cabinet is probably off the table) because Ive tried to earnestly speak my mind. Authenticity in writing is something I strive for, more so than snappy one-liners or coordinated groupthink. But in the end, I think my writing is probably more of a composite of all the people I admire and respect for their views and ability to express them. If you see Hunter S. Thompson or Felix Biederman, or even, God bless him, P. J. ORourke reflected, youre probably not wrong.

Now it ends. Biden is president, it seems, for good or for evil. Thank you for reading.

Were trapped in the belly of this horrible machineAnd the machine is bleeding to deathThe sun has fallen downAnd the billboards are all leeringAnd the flags are all dead at the top of their poles.

-Godspeed You! Black Emperor

View post:
OPINION: Countdown after the 3rd: I have no mouth and I must scream - The Daily Evergreen

Pepe the Frog is possibly one of the more ubiquitous internet icons of the past decade and ... [+] responsible for introducing innumerable people for better or worse to the field of political memes. (Photo by Anthony Kwan/Getty Images)

Its internet lore that President Donald Trump was memed into office. If thats true, theres only one meme responsible: Pepe the Frog. By the time President Trump tweeted his likeness in the form of cartoon amphibian in 2016, artist Matt Furies peaceful frog character had evolved and mutated in Internet communities from pacifist stoner to a symbol of hate.

Both the artist and the cartoon character are the subjects of Arthur Joness Feels Good Man, a comprehensive and disturbing tale of how the Internet operated in the 2010s. Pepe the Frog is possibly one of the more ubiquitous internet icons of the past decade and responsible for introducing innumerable people for better or worse to the field of political memes.

Trying to make sense of a meme is like explaining abstract art to some who doesnt visit museums, but that doesnt mean Arthur Joness Feels Good Man is inaccessible. In its hour and half run time, Feels Good Man draws in all the disparate elements that make a meme as ubiquitous, and culturally insidious, as Pepe the Frog. The elements illuminated in the film have been the subject of study for the last several years as the reach of the icon ranges from historical coincidences to the blockchain of rare Pepes that made their way into the cryptocurrency market. Its an overwhelming story filled with terms (NEET, dank, Kek, meme magic, Alpha, Beta males) likely little known outside the webs communities.

To explore the evolution of the cartoon character, Feels Good Man focuses on the trials of the seemingly ambivalent artist Matt Furie and his eventual exasperation as his favorite character becomes misused and weaponized by the far-right and later amplified by the conspiracist internet personality Alex Jones. Throughout the film, director Arthur Jones depicts Furie as a willfully powerless creator. At one point, Furie describes himself as a spectator to how things evolved on the internet. As a result, its easy to see Furie as nave over the course of the film as he tends to believe that the distortion and dangerous use of Pepe will run its course, but Furies emotional attachment blurs his reactions to the travails of his character.

Feels Good Man asks if redemption is possible for both the art and the artist in our current moment. Joness approach is holistic, and the film contains interviews from meme scholars, psychologists, occultists, forum posters, and Matt Furies friends and loved ones. Perhaps its the only way to tell a story as strange as the Pepe the Frog narrative and the artist that conceived him.

The film, released for digital download on September 4th and set to air on PBS in October, can be utilized as a retrospective of how we got to now or at the very least, a cautionary tale about art, internet communities, and digital linguistics. Pepes original transformation from pacifist frog to meme comes from Pepes iconic phrase Feels Good Man rather than the image. Like most digital memes, the derivatives of linguistic phrase amplified the image.

In the mid-2010s, an era of commodification moved Pepe from the fringes to the mainstream. Joness storytelling of this moment provides some of the most clarity in the film. 4channers believed the Pepe belonged to them and when celebrities like Katy Perry and Nicki Minaj posted Pepes on their own, the threat of loss encouraged the iconic perversion. From there, meme creators repurposed Pepe as a symbol for Trumps darker rhetoric, but it was finally codified as an alt-right meme when Hillary Clintons campaign provided an explainer of how the meme was misused. It gave validity to Pepe the Frogs use as an icon of hate and racism.

Furie attempted to end the controversy by killing Pepe the Frog in 2018, but by that point, a large portion of 160 million analyzed memes have used Pepe as a disturbing image. An interviewee named Pizza explains that the Pepe we see on 4chan now has been so far removed from the original that the Pepe Matt was killing was his own.

Feels Good Man is also an examination of the wider grift industry that permeated and formed many of the tactics of the far-right. In the climax of the film, Furie successfully sues Alex Jones to prevent further use of the Pepe image. While Arthur Jones somewhat downplays the success of the lawsuit as a small cash payout, Furies win against Alex Jones sets a precedent of memes and legal rights. While Pepe the Frog is still in the digital wild, Alex Jones is slowly receding into the background static of the conspiratorial web.

The epilogue of the film points to a possible redemption of Pepe the Frog as an icon of hope and resilience in Hong Kong and perhaps thats true, but the story clearly isnt over yet. Regardless, the film is a valuable document of a confusing time in history and in its short run time, provides an extraordinary story that needed to be told.

Feels Good Man is available for digital download on September 4th and will be aired on PBS on October 19th at 10pm.

Read the original here:
The Full Tale Of Pepe The Frogs Journey From Innocent ...