Archive for October, 2020

The Woman With the Pink Tennis Shoes Is Walking a Fine Line – The Atlantic

Back in the halcyon days of February, when healing America seemed like a figure of speech and indoor gatherings of more than two maskless people werent considered a biohazard, Wendy Davis addressed a 75-person crowd in the clubhouse of a gated community outside San Antonio. It was the third event in as many days for Davis, who was two weeks away from winning the Democratic primary to represent Texass Twenty-First Congressional District, a curiously drawn slice of the state that includes downtown Austin, the suburban sprawl of San Antonio, and a rural stretch of Hill Country. Davis delivered her standard stump speecha tight, policy-driven monologue that features the story of how she, a teen mom living in a trailer park, managed to make it to Harvard Law School, thanks to hard work, Pell Grants, and a Planned Parenthood around the cornerbefore fanning out to a case for stitching up the holes in todays social safety net. (Daviss granddaughters dont have the same opportunities she did, she said; we owe it to them to change that.) Afterward, a woman in her late 50s with a sensible brown bob and a faint twang pulled the candidate aside. I got an abortion, and I tell my Sunday-school class about it, the woman began, her voice cracking. I just dont believe in backing down. You just dont back down.

Davis nodded sympatheticallyshe gets this a lot. In 2013, Davis went from Texas state senator to feminist folk hero when she filibustered a bill to effectively close all but five abortion clinics in the state. Lean In feminism was sweeping the nation, and Sheryl Sandberg couldnt have asked for a better standard-bearer for her gospel of sharp-elbowed female empowerment. To avoid giving her (male) Republican opponents even the flimsiest reason to disqualify her, Davis followed Senate rules to the point of absurdityrefraining from sitting, eating, drinking, or using the bathroom (there was a catheter ) for 11 straight hours. The gladiatorial aspect of it all, plus the fact that Davis had done it in a pair of Mizuno sneakers that were an unapologetically girly shade of pink, captured the attention of tens of thousands on a livestream, among them President Barack Obama. When details of her biography surfaced the next day, Daviss cult status grew. Women sent macram uteruses to her office to express their gratitude. She was featured in the September issue of Vogue. Though her effort to kill the bill ultimately failed, she traveled throughout Texas on a Planned Parenthood bus, disembarking to choruses of young women chanting: Wendy! Wendy! Wendy!

A few months later, when she announced that she was running for governor, Davis wasnt expected to win, but that someone with her buzz was even seeking the office gave Democrats new hope for loosening the decades-long red chokehold on the state. Her campaign raised $40 million. Then what started as an exciting underdog effort became something like a disaster, paved with muddled messaging, accusations that shed embellished her origin story (she didnt live in the trailer for that long), and her campaigns release of a tasteless attack ad suggesting that her opponent, Greg Abbott, who uses a wheelchair, was a hypocrite for blocking disability-discrimination lawsuits as state attorney general. Davis suffered an embarrassing 20-point lossthe widest margin for a governors race the state had seen in almost two decadesand by the end of her campaign, her net favorability rating had cratered to negative 4. Apparently, most Texas voters didnt like her.

The arc of any good political story, of course, includes a comeback. When Davis announced that she was running for U.S. Congress in July 2019, Texas 21 wasnt especially high on anyones list of seats expected to flipthe district has been represented by a Republican since the 1970s. But she had a path to victory, albeit a narrow one. In recent years, the Twenty-First has experienced an explosion in population growth, with recent transplants skewing young, educated, and suburbana demographic that famously continues to drift to the left. It was an advantage compounded by the fact that the incumbent, Chip Roy, the former chief of staff to Senator Ted Cruz, is such a staunch far-right ideologue that he once blocked the passage of a disaster-relief bill that would have benefited Texas because it didnt contain sufficient funds for building President Donald Trumps border wall. In 2018, Roy topped the Democratic businessman running against him by only 2.6 percentage points.

Then came a national crisis that upended assumptions about likely winners and losers. In March 2020, almost every aspect of life became a campaign issue, even campaigning itself. In the ensuing five months, Davis held just a single in-person campaign event (outdoors, in a mask), while Roywho likened stay-at-home orders to laws in Nazi Germanyspoke with constituents in crowded restaurants and attended a large, lavish outdoor GOP fundraising gala that was investigated by the Travis County fire marshal for violating the governors COVID-19 protocols. The more daylight that shined between the candidates approach to the pandemic, the more the odds seemed to tilt in Daviss favor. (That the same dynamic was playing out on the national stage didnt hurt.) In July, following a surge of coronavirus cases in Texas, the nonpartisan Cook Political Report bumped up Daviss chances of winning, changing the Twenty-Firsts ranking from Lean R to Toss-Up. And in early September, after Obama endorsed Davis, her campaign disclosed the results of a poll it had conducted that showed the two candidates in a virtual tie. During an Instagram Live event with the actor Connie Britton, Davis appeared downright giddy about her chances of winning, letting out a Dont make a liar out of me! She was kidding, but there was also sincere trepidation in her voice. Davis, perhaps more than anyone, knows the dangers of getting swept up in the hype, and the heartbreak of assuming that this will be the year Texas turns blue.

Given that Davis staged what was essentially an 11-hour performance piece on the floor of the state Senate in 2013, you might expect her to be theatrical in persona wild gesticulator, or a master of dramatic pacing. You would be wrong. The 57-year-old lawyer has a regal mien that recalls a not-evil Claire Underwood (incidentally, a character who, like Davis, is a native Texan who lost her accent along the way). Daviss diction is ivory tower and her framing cerebral, even in the personal story she tells of discovering Planned Parenthood at 19, after giving birth to her first child, Amber: They made it possible for me to take control of my reproductive destiny, and that made it possible for me to take control of my economic opportunity. So I understand very deeply why that matters so much.

Two days before the stop in San Antonio in February, Davis attended an event at the Kerr County Democratic Party headquarters, in Kerrville. Kerrville is among the reddest parts of the district, so much so that six months later, Chip Roy would share a maskless fist bump with the towns former mayor, later shrugging off his behavior to a reporter for the Austin American-Statesman: When in Rome. The mostly white Boomers who came out for Davis were the areas committed Democratic minorityone man wore a MAGA-style hat that said Make Orwell Fiction Again. Most of their questions were about Daviss efforts to expand the electoratethis group loved her, but they couldnt see her convincing many more people from their demographic to vote for her. (Do you speak Spanish? one woman asked the candidate. Working on it, she replied.) Toward the end, a guy in the back about 30 years younger than nearly everyone else, with a smartwatch, a hipster haircut, and skinny jeans, raised his hand: Where did Davis stand on the Green New Deal?

Im for drafting the most aggressive billDavis pausedthat will pass in the Senate.

The question touched a nerve. Her thencampaign manager later told me that she thought the guy might have been a plant from a far left interest group. The campaign was almost certainly wary of a third-party candidate playing spoiler, as has happened in tight races elsewhere. Indeed, when a Green Party candidate threw his hat in the ring in April, Daviss campaign sued to keep him off the ballot because he hadnt paid the required filing fees. (She ultimately lost.)

Davis is not at all shy about being a moderate. In fact, she wants to lay claim to that designation, though she prefers the term mainstream. While health care is the centerpiece of her campaignand she will say approximately a billion times, to me, on Twitter, on the trail, presumably in her sleep, that Texas has the highest rate of uninsured people in the countryher solution is not Medicare for All. Rather, she prefers a competitive public option and expanding Medicare and Medicaid. Making sure every person in America has health care is a bold idea, she told me in February.. It doesnt mean were small thinkers if we dont think Medicare for All tomorrow is the correct path, right?

Her record is definitely on the mainstream side. The first political office she held was as a member of the Fort Worth city council, which didnt have party affiliations. During her time as a council member and later as a state senator, she championed a variety of causes, including commercial development in Fort Worth, protections against predatory lending, and regulation ofrather than a ban onthe nascent and booming fracking industry. (Davis even voted in several GOP primaries in the 1990s and, according to public records, donated to George W. Bush just before he announced his first presidential campaign.)

The problem is, as much as Davis and her campaign operatives believe mainstream is the way to go in a district that is purplish at best, and in a race where her opponent has given her the Trumpian nickname Extreme Wendy, the progressive faction of her party has more energy and influence than it has had in decades. She alienates the skinny-jeans set at her peril.

Its a strange spot for Davis to be in. Once described by former Planned Parenthood President Cecile Richards as someone who makes people believe anything was possible, Davis now cant take for granted the support of her partys left flank. Shes been lapped by the new generation of progressive stars, with their full-throated denunciations of capitalism and inequality, of structural racism and sexism. Daviss challenge is one faced by Democrats across the country hoping to capture traditionally Republican seats: how to keep progressives happy enough to pull the lever and woo members of the opposite party to do the same.

Davis blames her poor showing against Greg Abbott on being overly message-managed. If, for instance, she had attempted to talk about the importance of gun controlsomething she has done often in her current racemy team would have told me I lost my freaking mind, Davis told me, beginning to sound almost wistful.For me, that race felt so big and so hard. I didnt trust myself as much as I had in other races.

Bob Stein, a political-science professor at Rice University, is less existential in his assessment. Lets just get honest here. She wasnt what Id call a great candidate, he told me. He thinks Davis miscalculated how much identity politics would motivate female voters, especially on the abortion issue. She felt there were white Republican women who were offended that white males wanted to tell them what to do with their reproductive rights, and there werent. Davis has been much more circumspect about the issue this time around. At the start of the pandemic, when the state halted abortions on the grounds that they were a non-essential medical procedure, Davis tweeted about the topic only a handful of times, using relatively measured language. This makes absolutely zero sense and makes women more vulnerable, not less so, she said in one tweet.

In late September, when Senator Bernie Sanders hosted a virtual town hall, cheekily titled As Goes Texas, So Goes America, with various Texas Democratsincluding Julie Oliver, running a tight race in the neighboring Twenty-Fifth, and Jos Garza, vying for district attorney in Travis County, which overlaps with the Twenty-FirstDavis was conspicuously absent. Less polarizing special guests like Julin Castro and Beto ORourke werent enough of a counterbalance, it seemed, for Davis to risk being perceived as even socialist-curious. (When I asked her about her decision not to participate, Davis claimed ignorance. I certainly dont remember making a decision not to attend it, she said. I may not even have known about it, and thats probably the case.)

On the drive back to Austin from Kerrville in the winter, along a stretch of Highway 290 dotted with peach stands and personal-injury lawyers billboards, Davis explained where she sees herself in the landscape of Democratic talent. It would not be AOC. It would be Amy Klobuchar, she said decisively. It would be the person who goes in, puts her head down, and just works with people quietly and gets it done, you know? And thats not to take away from AOC, because I know that shes working hard on the things that really matter to her, but thats just not me.

The irony is, despite Daviss efforts to distance herself from the younger progressives, theyve helped provoke changes in attitude that are making her life easier, especially with regard to feminism. For one thing, there is much more recognition now that concepts such as likability are polluted by gender stereotypesand Daviss likability, recall, was underwater by the end of the governors race. A major cause of Texans disenchantment with Davis was media reports that she had fudged parts of her biography: She only lived in the trailer for a few months, which critics deemed not long enough to mention at all. Most damning, though, was the revelation that her then-husband had paid her law-school tuition and cared for their two children in Fort Worth while she was studying at Harvardprompting Ann Coulter to call Davis a gold-digger who found a sugar daddy. As proof that beliefs have evolved, look no further than what happened in March 2019, when Daviss fellow Texan, Beto ORourke, made a passing reference while he was running for president to his wife assuming most of the parenting duties. That he seemed to take this arrangement for granted, without so much as an Im so lucky, incited a barrage of accusations of male privilege. (He later apologized.)

Beto-for-President seems like ancient history. So much has happened in the past year and a half, and those events are still reverberating in the contest between Davis and Roy. Even as Trumps poll numbers have fallen in Texas, Roy has not stopped praising the presidents handling of the outbreak or trafficking in conspiracy theories, such as speculation that Democrats will experience a magic awakening after the election and their fears about the coronavirus will vanish. (Roy did complain, however, that his comments about Nazi Germany were taken out of context, explaining that he was referring only to a specific policy in Maine related to travel restrictions.) Meanwhile, Daviss campaign has pronounced Roy the nations top coronavirus skeptic and a danger to Texas families. Im observing my opponent going on CNN and telling the interviewer that everythings just fine in Texas on the day that we actually had the highest number of deaths in our state that wed had to that point, Davis told me when we spoke in August.

The contrast between the two candidates responses to police brutality against Black people isnt quite as sharp. After George Floyds killing in May, Davis slammed the presidents response, tweeting, True leaders mourn with the families who have lost loved ones, and she held a virtual town hall on the topic of racial justice and trans rights on June 11. But the next month, after a protester was fatally shot in downtown Austin and the national call for defunding the police reached a peak, she lowered the temperature of her rhetoric, tweeting: The incident last night in Austin at the Black Lives Matter protest was horrific. As we await more info, let us reaffirm that the right to peaceful protest is sacred in America. No doubt, Davis, who supports reforms such as banning chokeholds but has stopped short of anything more radical, is aware of just how badly defunding the police plays with the suburban voters shes trying to get. This is not lost on Roy, either. He took a staunch law-and-order tack amid the tear-gas standoffs between protesters and police that rocked Austin and San Antonio over the summer. And in September, after NBA players boycotted a handful of games to protest police brutality in Kenosha, Wisconsin, he appeared on the floor of the House with a framed jersey emblazoned with a 43: the number of on-duty law-enforcement officers killed so far this year, he said. Where is the NBA on this issue? Roy demanded.

One of Daviss favorite pieces of political trivia is about how Ann Richards, Ceciles mother and the patron saint of female politicians in Texas, won her 1990 bid for governor. The prevailing lore is that Richardss opponent, Clayton Williams, immolated a winning campaign with a single bizarre joke about rape (comparing it to bad weather, he said, If its inevitable, just relax and enjoy it).

But it wasnt the rape joke that did it, Davis told me, offering a slightly more nuanced account. Williams actually blew it at a public event right before the election, when Richards extended her hand to him, and he refused to shake it. Had that happened on any other daytwo days prior, or three days latershe probably wouldnt have won, Davis said excitedly. It was perfect timing. Its a lesson about just how swiftly circumstances can change in a campaign. Its also about how, if youre patient as a candidate, you just might get an openinga once-in-a-century pandemic, sayto show voters what youre really all about.

See original here:
The Woman With the Pink Tennis Shoes Is Walking a Fine Line - The Atlantic

Pope prays for peace and stability in Libya – Vatican News

Pope Francis prays for the fruitful outcome of international talks aimed at halting hostilities in Libya and at paving the way for a peaceful future for the country.

By Vatican News staff writer

Pope Francis on Sunday decried years of hostilities and strife in Libya and prayed for fruitful peace negotiations taking place at an international level.

He turned his thoughts to a group of Italian and Tunisian fishermen who were seized on 1 September by Libyan patrol boats, accused of fishing in territorial waters, and still detained in Benghazi.

Speaking after the recitation of the Angelus prayer in St. Peters Square, the Pope said "I pray for the various talks taking place at the international level, that they may be relevant for the future of Libya.

The time has come to stop all forms of hostility and encourage dialogue that will lead to peace and stability in the country, he said.

Mentioning the plight of the fishermen and his closeness also to their families, he asked those present in the square to pray together for the fishermen and for Libya, in silence.

"I would like to address a word of encouragement and support to the fishermen stopped more than a month ago in Libya and their families, the Pope said and he invoked Our Lady Star of the Sea to keep the hope alive that they will soon be able to embrace their loved ones.

Follow this link:
Pope prays for peace and stability in Libya - Vatican News

Artificial Intelligence (AI): 9 things IT pros wish the CIO knew – The Enterprisers Project

Artificial intelligence(AI) capabilities, frommachine learninganddeep learningtonatural languageprocessing (NLP) and computer vision, are rapidly advancing. Technology has never moved at such pace, meaning the role of the CIO is harder than ever to stay current and up to date with technology overall, so understanding the vast array of AI capabilities is a stretch for most CIOs right now, says Wayne Butterfield, director of cognitive automation and innovation technology research at advisory firmISG.

Naturally, IT leaders are increasingly exploring AI applications in the enterprise. However, AI-enabled initiatives do not necessarily lend themselves to traditional IT approaches.

AI-enabled initiatives do not necessarily lend themselves to traditional IT approaches.

It is imperative for CIOs to know AI in reasonable depth to understand its realistic and pragmatic adoption, explains Yugal Joshi, vice president of digital, cloud, and application services research forEverest Group. They need to understand what is doable as of today versus 3-5 years from now. Otherwise, there is a risk of them to either overestimate or underestimate AIs impact on business as well as IT.

[ Do you understandthe main types of AI?Read also:5 artificial intelligence (AI) types, defined.]

In addition, the business appetite for AI-driven transformation is at an all-time high, even asAI-washing by technology vendorscontinues to be a very real phenomenon. Its more important than ever that CIOs be able to differentiate between what is real versus what is vendor-driven AI marketing to make the best decisions for their business, Joshi says.

CIOs are increasingly hiring AI-savvy IT pros to further their digital transformation efforts. But those team members are depending on their IT leaders to understand enough about AI to best support and sustain their efforts. To that end, here are nine things CIOs should understand about AI.

In actual fact, its a group of technologies used to solve specific problems, says Butterfield. The catch-all term of Artificial Intelligence is so genericthat it is almost meaningless. In the most simplistic terms, AI is usually geared around providing a data-based answer or providing a data-fueled prediction. Then things begin to diverge.

NLP may be used to automate incoming emails, machine vision to gauge quality on the product line, or advanced analytics to predict a failure of your network. (For more on the various flavors of AI, read5 AI types, defined.) CIOs need to at least understand the strands of AI that are relevant to their business and ensure that they have a basic understanding of the problems that AI can solve for their business, and those it will not, Butterfield says.

"There is certainly a wide variety of people's expectations of AI, from realistic to off-the-wall."

There is certainly a wide variety of peoples expectations of AI, from realistic to off-the-wall, says Timothy Havens, the William and Gloria Jackson Associate Professor of Computer Systems in theCollege of Computing at Michigan Technological Universityand director of theInstitute of Computing and Cybersystems. CIOs should have at least a decent understanding of the limitations of AI such that they can predicate their expectations and properly evaluate AI solutions they are considering.

Machine learning, for example, can produce implicit models of very complex processes from representative data or experience. So an ML algorithm can learn to recognize cats by looking at millions of pictures of cats and not-cats, but it will not learn that cats meow or eat kibble.

The ROI on AI requires more patience than your average IT initiative. An Everest Group survey of more than 200 global IT leaders 84 percent cited long wait to return as a challenge. CIOs need to realize the reasons behind these long waits rather than getting flustered and disappointed with these, Joshi says.

In some cases, there may not be sufficient data governance in place.

CIOs need to understand the amount of data crunching needed to create an intelligent system, says Joshi. Therefore, CIOs need to decide whether the business has data and capability to build or use an AI system.

Havens advises CIOs to always ask where the training data will come from and how an algorithm is evaluated. That gets at whether this algorithm has been proven on real-world data that it hasnt seen before, Havens says.

In some cases, there may not be sufficient data governance in place. Although most organizations claim data is important, few invest as if that is the case. Their other enterprise functions such as HR and Finance have much larger teams than their data practice, says Joshi. CIOs need to understand what skills they need to invest given their spend appetite as some data skills may not be affordable for enterprises.

There is often a debate of where data science or AI Centers of Excellence belong, says Dan Simion, vice president of AI & Analytics with Capgemini North America. Some CIOs believe data scientists should sit within IT, while others may suggest data scientists be embedded within the business. CIOs must ensure that they are not downplaying the role of data scientists, says Simion, noting that when used properly they can do more than descriptive data visualizations but also solve business problems by leveraging AI and machine learning technologies.

CIOs who want to unlock the full potential of their AI programs should realize the knowledge and skills of their data scientists and give them opportunities to maximize the value they can drive, Simion says.

Thus, the operations team becomes extremely critical to the success or failure of intelligent capabilities. In fact, 61 percent of enterprises said their operations team are leaders in the charge of AI adoption in their organization, according to Everest Group research.

The operations team becomes extremely critical to the success or failure of intelligent capabilities.

Though [an increasing number of] enterprises are leveraging cloud-based AI offerings for cloud and SaaS vendors, the operations team is critical to scale such initiatives and create the needed guardrails, Joshi says.

One of the IT leaders most important roles is understanding the technology requirements necessary to support and sustain the companys AI transformations. In order for a company to be successful along its AI journey, Simion says, the CIO needs to make sure the AI technology stack is working and in sync with the overall enterprise technology.

Unlike many historical IT projects, AI initiatives require collaboration across data analytics, infrastructure, applications, data management, and the business. CIOs need to have the vision for creating such pod-based cross-functional teams that are jointly held accountable for the outcome and not for their individual pieces, Joshi says.

Although we throw around the term intelligent, AI is not inherently adaptive. AI algorithms are only good at what they are designed for, and will often fail miserably and in strange ways when applied to problems that may seem similar to humans, but are not similar from an AI-perspective, Havens says. An algorithm that is trained to drive a car in an urban environment may and probably will fail at rural driving, for example.

Is your organization looking to increase efficiency? Improve effectiveness? Transform the customer or user experience? Create entirely new business models? The CIO must understand what value the business wants to derive from AI adoption. Everest Group notes four common business imperatives: Efficiency, Effectiveness, Experience, and Evolution. CIOs may also need to manage inflated expectations of business around AI adoption and its impact on the organization.

[ How can automation free up staff time for innovation? Get the free eBook:Managing IT with Automation. ]

Go here to see the original:
Artificial Intelligence (AI): 9 things IT pros wish the CIO knew - The Enterprisers Project

This Harvard Professor And His Students Have Raised $14 Million To Make AI Too Smart To Be Fooled By Hackers – Forbes

By adding a few pixels (highlighted in red) to a legitimate check, fraudsters can trick artificial intelligence models into mistaking a $401 check for one worth $701. Undetected, the exploit could lead to large-scale financial fraud.

Yaron Singer climbed the tenure track ladder to a full professorship at Harvard in seven years, fueled by his work on adversarial machine learning, a way to fool artificial intelligence models using misleading data. Now, Singers startup, Robust Intelligence, which he formed with a former Ph.D. advisee and two former students, is emerging from stealth to take his research to market.

This year, artificial intelligence is set to account for $50 billion in corporate spending, though companies are still figuring out how to implement the technology into their business processes. Companies are still figuring out, too, how to protect their good AI from bad AI, like an algorithmically generated voice deepfake that can spoof voice authentication systems.

In the early days of the internet, it was designed like everybodys a good actor. Then people started to build firewalls because they discovered that not everybody was, says Bill Coughran, former senior vice president of engineering at Google. Were seeing signs of the same thing happening with these machine learning systems. Where theres money, bad actors tend to come in.

Enter Robust Intelligence, a new startup led by CEO Singer with a platform that the company says is trained to detect more than 100 types of adversarial attacks. Though its founders and most of the team hold a Cambridge pedigree, the startup has established headquarters in San Francisco and announced Wednesday that it had raised $14 million in a seed and Series A round led by Sequoia. Coughran, now a partner at the venture firm, is the lead investor on the fundraise, which also comes with participation from Engineering Capital and Harpoon Ventures.

Robust Intelligence CEO Yaron Singer is taking a leave from Harvard, where he is a professor of computer science and applied mathematics.

Singer followed his Ph.D. in computer science from the University of California at Berkeley, by joining Google as a postdoctoral researcher in 2011. He spent two years working on algorithms and machine-learning models to make the tech giants products run faster, and saw how easily AI could go off the rails with bad data.

Once you start seeing these vulnerabilities, it gets really, really scary, especially if we think about how much we want to use artificial intelligence to automate our decisions, he says.

Fraudsters and other bad actors can exploit the relative inflexibility of artificial intelligence models in processing unfamiliar data. For example, Singer says, a check for $401 can be manipulated by adding a few pixels that are imperceptible to the human eye yet cause the AI model to read the check erroneously as $701. If fraudsters get their hands on checks, they can hack into these apps and start doing this at scale, Singer says. Similar modifications to data inputs can lead to fraudulent financial transactions, as well as spoofed voice or facial recognition.

In 2013, upon taking an assistant professor position at Harvard, Singer decided to focus his research on devising mechanisms to secure AI models. Robust Intelligence comes from nearly a decade in the lab for Singer, during which time he worked with three Harvard pupils who would become his cofounders: Eric Balkanski, a Ph.D. student advised by Singer; Alexander Rilee, a graduate student; and undergraduate Kojin Oshiba, who coauthored academic papers with the professor. Across 25 papers, Singers team broke ground on designing algorithms to detect misleading or fraudulent data, and helped bring the issue to government attention, even receiving an early Darpa grant to conduct its research. Rilee and Oshiba remain involved with the day-to-day activities at Robust, the former on government and go-to-market, and the latter on security, technology and product development.

Robust Intelligence is launching with two products, an AI firewall and a red team offering, in which Robust functions like an adversarial attacker. The firewall works by wrapping around an organizations existing AI model to scan for contaminated data via Robusts algorithms. The other product, called Rime (or Robust Intelligence Machine Engine), performs a stress test on a customers AI model by inputting basic mistakes and deliberately launching adversarial attacks on the model to see how it holds up.

The startup is currently working with about ten customers, says Singer, including a major financial institution and a leading payment processor, though Robust will not name any names due to confidentiality. Launching out of stealth, Singer hopes to gain more customers as well as double the size of the team, which currently stands at 15 employees. Singer, who is on leave from Harvard, is sheepish about his future in academia, but says he is focused on his CEO role in San Francisco at the moment.

For me, Ive climbed the mountain of tenure at Harvard, but now I think weve found an even higher mountain, and that mountain is securing artificial intelligence, he says.

Continued here:
This Harvard Professor And His Students Have Raised $14 Million To Make AI Too Smart To Be Fooled By Hackers - Forbes

Defense Official Calls Artificial Intelligence the New Oil – Department of Defense

Artificial intelligence is the new oil, and the governments or the countries that get the best datasets will unquestionably develop the best AI, the Joint Artificial Intelligence Center's chief technologyofficer said Oct. 15.

Speaking on a panel about AI superpowers at the Politico AI Summit, Nand Mulchandani said AI is a very large technology and industry. "It's not a single, monolithic technology," he said. "It's a collection of algorithms, technologies, etc., all cobbled together to call AI."

The United States has access to global datasets, and that's why global partnerships are so incredibly important, he said, noting the Defense Department launched the AI partnership for defense at the JAIC recently to have access to global datasets with partners, which gives DOD a natural advantage in building these systems at scale.

"Industry has to develop on its own, and that's where the global talent is; that's where the money is; that's where all of the innovation is going on," Mulchandani noted, adding that the U.S. government's job is to be able to work in the best way and absorb the best technology that it can. That includes working hand in glove with industry on a voluntary basis, he said. He said there are certain areas of AI that are highly scaled that you can trust and deploy at scale.

"But notice many or not many of those systems have been deployed on weapon systems. We actually don't have any of them deployed," he said.

Mulchandani said the reason is that explainability, testing, trust and ethics are all highly connected pieces and even AI security when it comes to model security, data security being able to penetrate and break models. This is all very early, which is why the DOD and the U.S. government widely have taken a very stringent approach to putting together the ethics principles and frameworks within which we're going to operate.

"[Earlier this year, one of the first international visits that we made were to NATO and our European partners, and [we] then pulled them into this AI partnership for defense that I just talked about," he said. "Thirteen different countries are getting together to actually build these principles because we actually do need to build a lot of confidence in this."

He said DOD continues to attract and have the best talent at JAIC. "The real tricky part is: How do we actually take that technology and get it deployed? That's the complexity of integrating AI into existing systems, because one isn't going to throw away the entire investment of legacy systems that one has, whether it be software or hardware or even military hardware," Mulchandani said. "[How] can we absorb the best of what's coming and get it integrated into the system as where the complexity is?"

DOD has had a long history of companies that know how to do that, and harnessing it is the actual work and the piece that we're worried about the most and really are focused on the most, he added.

A global workforce the DOD technology companies are global companies, he emphasized. "These are not linked to a particular geographic region. We hire. We bring the best talent in, wherever it may be, [and we have] research and development arms all over the world."

DOD has special security needs and requirements that must be taken care of when it comes to data, and the JAIC is putting in place very different development processes now to handle AI development, he said. "So, the dynamics of the way software gets built [and] the dynamics of who builds it are changing in a very significant way," Mulchandani said. "But the global war for talent is a real one, which is why we are not actually focused on trying to corner the market on talent."

He said they are trying to build leverage by building relationships with the leading AI companies to harness the innovation.

See original here:
Defense Official Calls Artificial Intelligence the New Oil - Department of Defense