Archive for July, 2020

How Zoom fatigue inspires better video chat tech from Facebook, Google, and Microsoft – Vox.com

Its well over 100 days into the Covid-19 crisis, and I have to make a confession: I hate doing everything over video chat. I hated it at the start, and I hate it in new ways now. Youve probably heard of Zoom fatigue. Ive transcended Zoom fatigue. At this stage in the pandemic, Im experiencing something more advanced, like that moment on a long run when youve fought through fatigue, tapped into your bodys store of endorphins, and also lost a toenail.

Whether I like it or not, most of my work life and social life will happen via webcam in the weeks and months to come. Despite my complaints, however, this does not have to be a bad thing.

Even after the pandemic ends, video chat will play an increasingly important role at work, for school, in health care, and in our relationships with friends and family. The pandemic not only pushed this technology into new scenarios of our daily lives but also forced people to learn how to use it. Folks that hadnt tried Zoom, FaceTime, or Google Meet before March became power users in record time. Some of these new users have even embraced the softwares virtual backgrounds and AI-generated face-smoothing effects. (The software is extremely easy to use now compared to 15 years ago, when I first used it.) While few of us want to keep doing Zoom happy hours after the pandemic ends, more of us are comfortable using it than ever before.

What happened with a pandemic is interesting, Zooms chief product officer Odel Gal told me. All the people that were resistant to using the technology were forced to use it.

So what does our future of talking through screens actually look like? In an effort to answer a capricious question, I talked to Apple, Facebook, Google, Microsoft, and Zoom about their post-pandemic plans for video chat. The companies all reported record numbers of new users and total usage, and they were predictably optimistic about whats next for living in digital spaces. But much to my surprise, the companies were pretty quick to acknowledge the shortcomings of video chat.

Thats because there is no substitute that is as good as talking to people in person. In the near future, though, the next best thing might not be so bad.

Video chat as we know it is barely two decades old. Starting around the time Skype launched in 2003, what was once a futurists fantasy became a problematic reality. But the potentially transformative technology has always seemed a year or two away from being actually usable. So you might say that weve struggled with Zoom fatigue for quite some time, when you consider that abysmal picture quality, stuttering audio, and the general awkwardness of talking to screens have always been features of the video chat experience.

Years later, the techs persistent shortcomings, like how you cant quite make eye contact with the other people on a video call, continue to feel frustrating. When most of your human interaction for months on end is happening via video chat, these annoyances become downright exhausting.

Zoom fatigue is the feeling of utter hopelessness after your ninth video call of the day, and experts say its brought on because the technology overtaxes your brain. Presented with a cropped, often blurry image of a human and a few milliseconds of lag throughout the conversation, your mind splits its attention between what people are saying and whats happening on the screen, longing for nonverbal cues that just dont cross over.

Some call it Zoom burnout, though the fatigue descriptor better encapsulates how were tired of video calls but have to keep doing them. Others suggest the real problem is that were all depressed by the state of our lives in the pandemic. Regardless, video chat has always had fundamental flaws that make it prone to creating unsatisfying experiences.

We are constantly presented with the promise of instantaneous connection that seamlessly connects us with the people we love and the people we work with, and thats always a fiction, Jason Farman, a faculty associate with Harvard Universitys Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society, explained. I think weve seen that promise for well over 100 years.

It was about 100 years ago that the telephone, first widely adopted as a business tool, started to become popular as a way to talk to friends. Skeptics at the time warned that phones upended the idea of social trust, since you couldnt see who you were talking to, but Bell Labs quickly cooked up an attempt at a solution in the 1920s by accompanying a telephone call with a televised image.

President Herbert Hoover famously tested the device, placing a video call from Washington, DC, to New York in 1927. The television feed only worked one way, so those in New York could see the people in Washington, but not the other way around. AT&T president Walter S. Gifford said at the time that devices like this would, eventually, add substantially to human comfort and happiness.

AT&T worked for decades trying to improve these devices, which were rudimentary and room-sized in their early versions. The company introduced a two-way television phone, dubbed the Iconophone, in 1930, and then in the 60s, it introduced a much more advanced contraption called the Picturephone at the Worlds Fair in New York. Those who tested it complained about bad picture quality and awkward controls.

Nevertheless, the Picturephone did go to market in 1970, when customers in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, could sign up for the service and lease the equipment for $160 per month plus extra costs over the included 30 minutes of call time. This was extremely expensive, and AT&T discontinued the project in 1978. Though it invented several more video phones over the years, including the full-color $1,500 VideoPhone 2500, AT&T never had any major commercial successes with video calling.

A few decades later, internet-connected computers and phones transformed the whole proposition of video chat, especially after broadband speeds became the norm. And when Skype debuted in the early aughts, any laptop with wifi and a webcam became a video phone. Then in 2011, the iPhone 4 came along with a front-facing camera and the FaceTime video chat that worked on 3G networks, and millions of people could make video calls on the go. But it didnt immediately catch on. Around that time, not even one-fifth of Americans had tried video calling online or on their phones.

While I do remember trying FaceTime when it launched, until the pandemic, I never actually wanted to video chat rather than talk on the phone or over text, especially in my personal life. I only ever remember feeling disconnected or distracted in video chats before the pandemic and it seems I wasnt alone in that. A group of Yale researchers recently found that we can actually understand emotions better through voice than video.

In recent years, though, videoconferencing has become essential in certain industries. Knowledge workers and those who have the luxury of working remotely have increasingly relied on the technology. The quality of video calls has also vastly improved, and it seems to be getting better as companies compete with each other to make calls feel more natural and realistic.

Googles video chat tech now employs artificial intelligence to tune out background noise, for example, and Facebook uses an AI-powered camera in Portal, its suite of video-calling devices, to track the movement of subjects. Andrew Bosworth, Facebooks head of augmented and virtual reality, told me the company designed this feature to keep it feeling like its alive as opposed to this fixed image that your brain kind of starts blurring out, which is what happens with so many video calling setups.

Yet the fundamental flaws with the medium generally persist. Video calls typically take more work than a phone call, if only because they require an additional sense, and they dont quite live up to the authenticity of an in-person meeting. Still, theyve found a home in the conference room. Most of the major tech companies have now built their own video chat platforms, with the most prominent ones, like Google Meet and Microsoft Teams, aimed at business customers. And, of course, theres Zoom, which were all tired of now.

What comes after Zoom fatigue is what Id call Zoom acquiescence. Its an inevitability.

During the pandemic, weve all started relying on video chat technology for health care, religion, entertainment, and simply keeping up with friends. It will remain relevant in our lives going forward, especially for work. Much like those who were gobsmacked by telephones a century ago, were likely witnessing a transformation in communication a leap forward with no return. The new thing is scary, imperfect, and often off-putting. We might as well make the best of it.

Weve been forced to use these tools for things that we otherwise never would have dreamed of, like buying and selling houses, said Nicole Ellison, a professor at the University of Michigans School of Information. Well essentially come out of this with a better, more calibrated sense of what we really need to do face to face.

We might not, for instance, need to go to the doctors office as often. While telemedicine has existed for years, the pandemic forced all kinds of doctors appointments to happen online. Some experts think theres no reason to go back, arguing that over half of doctors visits dont require an in-person meeting. Research has also shown that telemedicine is significantly more efficient than traditional in-person visits for mental health care, and these benefits could mean more people seek help.

Video callings most useful applications also go beyond simply allowing two people to chat with each other. Several of the experts and video chat company representatives I interviewed brought up a different use case for the tech: as an additive to otherwise limiting scenarios, like a kids birthday party, for example. While the pandemic has meant that parties have to happen over Zoom or FaceTime, theres no reason we cant include a video component as the threat of the virus subsides. Grandma and Grandpa werent able to make the trip? Fire up the webcam and put them on the TV when its time to blow out the candles.

That idea might seem a little weird, but hosting a party with a video chat component certainly sounds less weird today than it would have six months ago. If it was already evident that videoconferencing had become a mainstay of many offices, that it could be a prominent part of our social lives is a new idea to me. That explains my initial surprise when the folks from Microsoft Teams started telling me how their workplace software had taken on new roles, like social networking, in many users lives. In other words, the pandemic has fundamentally changed our relationship with these tools and with digital spaces generally.

I think one of the durable things that will happen here is that video and broadcasting not to the world, but to a small group whats happening in our lives actually is going to be the next generation of the social network, Jared Spataro, corporate vice president for Microsoft 365, said. Im convinced that that will be true.

But as weve learned from Zooms periodic meltdowns, repurposing office software for our social lives is a tricky business. Part of why we have felt fatigue from video calls during the pandemic is because the technology was designed for a different purpose than having virtual happy hours or hosting graduation parties. Its even worse if youre using the same laptop for work calls and fun times. Little tweaks like virtual backgrounds and fun filters help liven things up, but the next generation of the social network would really benefit from some new hardware.

Tech bloggers worried about Portal when it launched because honestly, who wants to put a camera and microphone made by the privacy nightmare that is Facebook in their home? But as the pandemic has begun to change how many of us think about privacy, maybe a dedicated video phone isnt so scary after all. The privacy concerns might just work themselves out as more people make more video calls, and companies continue to improve the technology.

Dedicated video-calling devices might finally be ready for primetime. Facebook told me that Portal sales have increased by a factor of 10 since mid-March; they were reportedly very low as recently as last fall. The company is also selling a $150 Portal TV, which is essentially a webcam for your living room.

Then theres the Nest Hub Max, a smart display from Google, that recently gained the ability to host Google Duo and Google Meet group video calls. (The Amazon Echo Show is a similar device but lacks the group call feature for now.) Even Zoom is now selling hardware of its own by partnering with a company called DTEN on an all-in-one personal collaboration device that has multiple cameras that adapt to different rooms. The company announced the new Zoom for Home initiative earlier this week and is now taking preorders for its first device, the DTEN ME.

Its just the beginning, Gal, from Zoom, told me. But I think the idea is youre not using your laptop all the time for communication. You are using a dedicated device that is outside of that that is kind of smarter.

In my former life covering gadgets, I tested a lot of these devices and struggled to understand how theyd fit into most peoples everyday lives. Yet, about a week after stay-at-home orders had me trapped in my apartment, all I wanted was a better video phone machine. In the end, I got a Logitech Brio, an HD webcam thats dead simple to use and move around the apartment. When the time comes, I can put it on top of my TV and invite my extended family to my birthday party, where theyll be able to have more normal-seeming conversations with my wife and me and our two unhinged Chihuahuas.

The possibilities for hanging out in digital spaces get more exciting when you look into the very near future. Virtual hangouts are already getting pretty weird and interesting. In recent months, weve witnessed the explosive popularity of Animal Crossing: New Horizons, a Nintendo game that lets you build your own island and explore the digital worlds built by others. There have also been a growing number of virtual events, like concerts in Fortnite.

The bright minds at Oculus hope these trends translate to virtual reality, where theyve built a social app called Facebook Horizon. Now in beta, the app looks like a slightly more cartoonish version of the pixelated universe in the dystopian thriller Ready Player One and also reminds me of the time Mark Zuckerberg toured a hurricane-ravaged Puerto Rico in VR using the Facebook Spaces app.

Of all the companies coming up with new ways we can talk to each other online, Facebook and Oculus might be best positioned for a radical transformation. At least thats the impression I got from my conversation with Bosworth, the Facebook executive in charge of Portal as well as the companys Oculus division. The future of truly science fiction-inspired, hologram-based experiences sounded much more interesting to me than talking to a grainy 2D image on a screen.

The bottlenecks that we have to providing people the augmented reality vision that we kind of share where we do have those holograms speaking to people and it feels like youre seeing them face to face those are exactly the problems that were tackling in my group, in AR/VR, Boz told me. But those are probably going to be a little bit further out, at least a couple years away.

So its doubtful that well be talking to holographic versions of each other in two years. But tech that offers lifelike three-dimensional images without the need for glasses or a headset does exist. Earlier this year, a Brooklyn-based startup called Looking Glasses started shipping the worlds highest-resolution holographic display, which looks like a glass box and creates a dynamic image floating in space. Its not hard to imagine using a device like this for video calls, since the light-field technology could make the image of a face look like an actual face.

Another concept for making video calls feel more like real-life interactions takes its inspiration from a window. Its called the Square and is a camera-equipped display dreamed up by the futurists at Argodesign, a self-described innovation firm based in Austin, Texas.

Meant to be used at work, the Square is equipped with a shade that youd slide up when youre available, and coworkers could effectively drop in and chat through this virtual window. There are multiple cameras in the unit, and together they create a parallax effect thats not quite 3D but does create some dimension in the image. Mark Rolston, the founder of Argodesign, says the company has working prototypes of the Square and seems eager for a company to start producing the device or something like it.

We know its possible, and we know someone will make it, Rolston said. Were not really worried about that moment, that inflection point. Were just trying to tease the world a little bit.

That sentiment sums up the entire history of video chat. Weve been fielding teases since the 19th century. Each new invention comes a little bit closer to a product that really works and could bring us closer together. But even in the era of iPhones, something is still not quite right with video calls. The technology seems like its inherited many of the problems of early telephones but without the breakaway success.

Then again, what made early telephones so transformative? At a certain point, a critical mass of people had them, and those who had them used them a lot. Now, a critical mass of people have video chat technology, and thanks to the pandemic, were using it. So bring on the holograms.

Support Voxs explanatory journalism

Every day at Vox, we aim to answer your most important questions and provide you, and our audience around the world, with information that has the power to save lives. Our mission has never been more vital than it is in this moment: to empower you through understanding. Voxs work is reaching more people than ever, but our distinctive brand of explanatory journalism takes resources particularly during a pandemic and an economic downturn. Your financial contribution will not constitute a donation, but it will enable our staff to continue to offer free articles, videos, and podcasts at the quality and volume that this moment requires. Please consider making a contribution to Vox today.

Read the original here:
How Zoom fatigue inspires better video chat tech from Facebook, Google, and Microsoft - Vox.com

Facebook to start reminding users to wear a mask – The Irish News

Facebook is to begin reminding users to wear a face covering to help prevent the spread of coronavirus.

The social networking giant is introducing alerts at the top of its news feed and on Instagram to encourage users to wear a mask when social distancing is not possible.

Face coverings will be mandatory in shops and supermarkets in England from July 24, with fines of 100 for those who fail to comply.

The Facebook alerts will include a link to World Health Organisation (WHO) information on preventing the spread of Covid-19 and how masks can help, the company said.

Earlier in the pandemic, Facebook introduced a dedicated Covid-19 Information Centre, offering clear and prominent links to official guidance and health information from the NHS and the Government as part of efforts to stop the spread of misinformation linked to the virus.

Social media platforms have been criticised for failing to prevent a number of false claims and misinformation from circulating online.

In a new effort to combat this threat, Facebook also said a new Facts About Covid-19 section was being added to the Information Centre, which will debunk common myths, identified by the WHO, related to the virus.

Steve Hatch, Facebooks vice president for northern Europe, said: We want Facebook to be a place where people can stay informed and connected during the Covid-19 pandemic.

To help reduce the spread of this virus, from today people using Facebook and Instagram will see alerts reminding them to wear a mask when they cant keep a safe distance from others.

Through other alerts on our platforms weve directed over 3.5 million visits to the latest accurate information from the Government and the NHS.

Weve also removed hundreds of thousands of harmful posts relating to the virus and, working with fact-checkers like Full Fact, placed warning labels on more than 90 million posts.

Continuing this fight against misinformation were creating a new section of our Coronavirus Information Centre called Facts About Covid-19, which will debunk many common myths identified by the WHO.

Facebook said its Information Centre had so far directed more than two billion people to the WHO and other health authorities for guidance on the virus, and more than 600 million people had clicked through prompts to learn more.

Link:
Facebook to start reminding users to wear a mask - The Irish News

How to easily boot Windows 10 in Safe Mode – MobiGyaan

To troubleshoot Windows operating system, Microsoft offers users an option to boot the operating system in Safe Mode. When using Safe Mode, users can pinpoint what the issue is with the computer.

If the computer is working fine in Safe Mode, it means that theres no issue with the default settings and basic drivers of your computer. Thus, the recently made changes on your computer could be at fault.

In this step by step guide, we will show you how you can easily boot your Windows 10 operating system into a Safe Mode.

Step 1: Open the Start Menu on your computer.

Step 2:Click on the power button which will present options to either shut down your computer or restart it.

Step 3:Keep pressing the Shift key on your keyboard and then click on Restart button.

Your computer will now restart in Windows Recovery Environment. There will be a blue screen with a Choose an Option menu.

Step 3:From the given options, click on the option Troubleshoot.

Step 4:In the Troubleshoot screen, click on Advanced Options and then click on Startup Settings.

If the Startup Settings does not appear, click see more recovery options at the bottom of your screen.

Step 5:Now, click on the Restart button which will restart the computer and offer a few options as Startup Settings.

Step 6: Based on your needs, either start the computer in Safe Mode or Safe Mode with Networking by pressing the corresponding number key on your keyboard.

You can tell youre in safe mode if you see a message at the top of your screen and your resolution is diminished. You can now uninstall software, scan for malware, update your drivers, or run a system restore to fix any issues.

Go here to read the rest:
How to easily boot Windows 10 in Safe Mode - MobiGyaan

Twitter Rolls Out New Messaging Interface That Allows Users to Easily Access DMs – Gadgets 360

Twitter is rolling out a new feature that will enable users to easily slide into DMs (Direct messages). The new messaging interface essentially allows users to read or reply to messages without having to leave the home page. Earlier, to access the direct messages on Twitter, users had to switch to the DMs section by clicking on the mail icon. The new interface shows DMs in a pop-up window directly on the home screen. Twitter is currently rolling out the new messaging interface on its Web client, and it is being pushed out in a phased manner. Gadgets 360 was able to verify its availability in India.

The message prompt will appear at the bottom right corner of the screen. The new Twitter DM interface is similar to the message prompt on LinkedIn. With the introduction of this feature, users will be able to access direct messages right on the home page. However, the previous DM section on Twitter Web is still available to use despite the introduction of the new interface.

The new DM feature is also highlighted in a teaser posted on Twitter. More details about its availability on the Twitter app for Android and iOS are expected from the company in the coming days.

To improve user experience, the microblogging platform has been continuously adding new features amidst the global pandemic. Earlier in June, Twitter had introduced a Snapchat-Story like feature dubbed Fleets. With this feature, Twitter allowed users to post any content that lasts for only 24 hours. The company in the same month had introduced voice tweets that allowed users to send 140-second audio clip attached to a tweet. Twitter has improved its List section on the platform as well.

However, the company is currently embroiled in a controversy after Twitter accounts of several prominent personalities were hacked. These Twitter accounts sent out tweets trying to dupe people into donating money in Bitcoin cryptocurrency.

For the latest tech news and reviews, follow Gadgets 360 on Twitter, Facebook, and Google News. For the latest videos on gadgets and tech, subscribe to our YouTube channel.

Link:
Twitter Rolls Out New Messaging Interface That Allows Users to Easily Access DMs - Gadgets 360

Twitter and the Hashtag Way – Qrius

Jean Burgess, Queensland University of Technology

Perhaps no single character has been as iconic a symbol of Twitter as the now-ubiquitous hashtag.

The syntax of the hashtag has a few simple rules: it consists of the hash symbol (#) immediately followed by a string of alphanumeric characters, with no spaces or punctuation.

It is used routinely in social media communication across a number of platforms including Tumblr, Instagram, and even Facebook, but its most important point of emergence and polarisation has been in Twitter.

The hashtag remains most comfortable in Twitter, and it was Twitter that turned it into a highly significant, multi-functional feature. The hashtag has made its way off the internet, appearing regularly on television, in advertising, on products and on protest signs around the world.

From its beginnings as a geeky tool designed to help individual users deal with an increasingly fragmented information stream, Twitter made the hashtag a new and powerful part of the worlds cultural, social and political vocabulary.

The @ feature helped people organise into pairs and create conversational streams. The hashtag, which organises tweets into topics, publics, and communities, goes to the heart of a crucial question: how is the internet organised and for whom?

Although its use on Twitter was new, the # has a prehistory both as a punctuation mark and as part of internet communication. Imported from elsewhere, as was the @, the hashtag brought some of its prior conventional understandings with it.

Known as the octothorpe by typography experts, in early computer-mediated communication the hash or pound symbol was used to mark channels and roles in systems like Internet Relay Chat (real-time, online text messaging used as early as 1988). It therefore worked to both categorise topics and group users.

The # also became closely tied to crowd-sourced content tagging systems. On the music-streaming site Last.fm, users could tag artists and songs. The site used these tags as information to learn about music, fuelling recommendations and radio streams, and laying the groundwork for Spotify and other apps current recommendation algorithms.

User-contributed tags were important on the Flickr photosharing website, where they helped direct people to images and to one another a practice that was carried over to Instagram. Crucially, users could add as many tags to their Flickr photographs as they liked, creating a system that was less a taxonomy (an expertly ordered system based on exclusive, hierarchical categories) and more a folksonomy (a crowd-sourced one, based on inclusive tags and aggregation).

Folksonomical ordering, in the mid-2000s, was widely imagined as a more efficient, organic way of ordering content than categories or directories, and it was this model that underpinned the popular social bookmarking service del.icio.us.

The Flickr folksonomy of user-contributed tags was paradigmatic of the Web 2.0 ideology marked by a shift from the web 1.0 idea that web development was about serving content to audiences to one where the goal was building architectures for participation of users (sometimes distinguished from passive website visitors) and the expectation that the user communitys activities would add further value.

Reddits systems for upvoting user-curated content, subreddits and modern Twitters aggregated trending topics are contemporary versions of this early tag-based co-curation model.

As far as we know, the hashtags use in Twitter was first proposed in mid-2007 by Chris Messina in a series of blog posts.

In Messinas view, the hashtag was a solution to a need. At this time, it was still possible to see a public feed of every single tweet from a public account. Topical conversations among people who did not follow one another were incoherent at best.

The users advocating for the hashtag were technically proficient (many of them also developers) with an active online presence, who positioned themselves as participants in a community of lead users.

While some users were experimenting with hashtags, Messinas vision for them didnt catch on widely until a particularly acute and sufficiently significant event the San Diego brushfires in 2007.

With this event, Messina achieved wider take-up of the hashtag as a tool for coordinating crisis communication by actively lobbying other lead users and media organisations.

Although this rapidly unfolding disaster demonstrated a clear and legitimating use case, the broader meaning of the hashtag and its possible uses remained ambiguous. Despite this, Messina, as a tech-industry insider and lead user, continued to widely advocate for its use even reportedly pitching it to the Twitter leadership.

Journalist Nick Bilton relates an encounter between Twitter founders Biz Stone and Ev Williams and Messina, at the Twitter offices, as follows:

I really think you should do something with hashtags on Twitter, Chris told them. Hashtags are for nerds, Biz replied. Ev added that they were too harsh and no one is ever going to understand them.

Twitter had begun wrestling with the problem (which still haunts it) of conflict between the cultures of expert users that made the platform work for them and the new users they alienated but whom the company badly needed to sustain its growth. The hashtag provoked contestation between Twitters different cultures as it was taken up both for the serious uses such as disaster and professional discussion Messina had envisioned and to create sociable rituals and play.

From the beginning, there was debate around the right way to use hashtags.

As Messinas historical documentation and that of others show, there were several competing models of how and why to coordinate Twitter activity as the flow of tweets started to grow beyond an easily manageable size.

Perhaps the # was a tag, designed to help organise collections of tweets on shared topics? Or was it a way to form channels, or groups of users interested in those topics?

Underlying these different models of what the hashtag could become were different models of Twitter: as an information network, a social networking site or online community, or a platform for discussion and the emergence of publics (organised communities).

Such ideas were still new and hotly contested at the time. Though the informational seems to have won out over the conversational model of Twitter, the hashtag remains, and is used for an astonishing array of social, cultural, and political purposes some of them vitally useful, not all of them serious, and some of them downright toxic.

The website Hashtags.org was launched in December 2007, and provided a real-time tracking and indexing of hashtags before Twitter implemented search. Participants at an event, for instance, could visit the website to see other tweets from the same event.

The hashtags in the earliest archived version of the Hashtags.org homepage, from April 2008, include a number of academic and tech conferences (#EconSM, #netc08, #interact2008) and sporting and entertainment events (#idol, #yankees, #REDSOX), and tweet categories (#haiku). Hashtags were used for coordinating discussion topics and finding like-minded users (#seriousgames, #punknews, #college, #PHX), brands and products (#gmail, #firefox), and even people (such as Wired journalist #ChrisAnderson).

Back then, the most tweeted hashtags were represented as amassing tweets numbering in the tens or at most hundreds, a reminder of the modest scale of Twitter at the time. Uses of hashtags, such as for humour, activism or second-screen television viewing, had yet to emerge.

Ever since those early debates about whether Twitter needed channels (of topics) or groups (of users), hashtags have continued to play both structural and semantic roles: that is, they coordinate both communities and topics, helping users find each other and encounter a range of contributions to the discussion of issues and events.

The hashtag has fostered the rise of Twitter as a platform for news, information and professional promotion, yet the forces that allowed hashtags to become influential are deeply rooted in its conversational and sociable uses.

The capacity of the hashtag to help people navigate real-time events such as disasters, protests and conferences, and to expand and solidify social connections and community, proved particularly ideal for social movements and activism.

Such uses have in many ways come to define both the hashtag and, increasingly, Twitter itself. Perhaps the most notable confluence of hashtags and bodies-in-the-street activism has come from #Blacklivesmatter. As US academics Deen Freelon, Charlton D. McIlwain, and Meredith D. Clark document:

The Twitter hashtag was created in July 2013 by activists Alicia Garza, Patrisse Cullors, and Opal Tometi in the wake of George Zimmermans acquittal for second-degree murder of unarmed Black teenager Trayvon Martin.

For more than a year, #Blacklivesmatter was only a hashtag, and not a very popular one: it was used in only 48 public tweets in June 2014 and in 398 tweets in July 2014. But by August 2014 that number had skyrocketed to 52,288, partly due to the slogans frequent use in the context of the Ferguson protests. Some time later, Garza, Cullors, Tometi, and others debuted Black Lives Matter as a chapter-based activist organization.

Its easy to dismiss hashtag activism as a form of slacktivism rather than real political engagement. But the rise of #Blacklivesmatter and its ties to street protests and unjust policing serves as an important reminder of the embodiment and liveness of many events that might look merely like data or chatter when viewed as hashtags.

This is an edited extract from Twitter: A Biography by Jean Burgess and Nancy K. Baym, published by NYU Press.

Nancy K. Baym is Senior Principal Researcher, Microsoft Research and Research Affiliate in Comparative Media Studies/Writing, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge Massachusetts.

Jean Burgess, Professor and Director, Digital Media Research Centre, Queensland University of Technology

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Stay updated with all the insights.Navigate news, 1 email day.Subscribe to Qrius

Originally posted here:
Twitter and the Hashtag Way - Qrius