Archive for July, 2020

The global Internet of Things (IoT) security market size is expected to grow from USD 12.5 billion in 2020 to USD 36.6 billion by 2025, at a Compound…

New York, July 24, 2020 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Reportlinker.com announces the release of the report "IoT Security Market by Type, Component, Solution, Service, Application Area And Region - Global Forecast to 2025" - https://www.reportlinker.com/p04975555/?utm_source=GNW However, the new variants of IoT threats, lack of awareness, costly IoT security solutions, and budget constraints among SMEs for IoT security may limit the market growth.

The cloud security segment to grow atthe highest CAGR during the forecast periodCloud security addresses both physical and virtual security across the service models of software, platforms, and infrastructures.Various cloud application security solutions include risk assessment, application governance, identity access management, encryption, malware detection and protection, and Security Information and Event Management (SIEM).

Cloud security is one of the most important aspects of IoT security, as IoT data is saved in Virtual Machines (VMs) and susceptible to cyber-attacks.

Identity and access management segment to hold the largest share of IoT security solutions during the forecast periodIdentity and access management refers to a business process framework.This framework consists of policies and technologies, which help organizations control the appropriate accesses of all employees to technology resources.

The identity access management solution plays a vital role in managing enterprises electronic or digital identities. These solutions can be quickly and cost-effectively integrated with identity access management policies across on-premises, cloud, and hybrid environments.

Asia Pacific (APAC)to grow at the highest growth rate during the forecast periodAPAC has witnessed the advanced and dynamic adoption of new technologies, and is expected to record the highest CAGR during the forecast period. The increasing government initiatives; growing requirements for quick computing, virtualized environments, analytics, security, digitalization, and high-volume networking; and rising overall internet speed and responsiveness are the major factors driving the IoT security market growth in this region..

In-depth interviews were conducted with Chief Executive Officers (CEOs), marketing directors, innovation and technology directors, and executives from various key organizations operating in the IoT security market.

The following list provides the breakup of primary respondents profile: By company type: Tier 1: 35%, Tier 2: 45%, and Tier 3: 20% By designation: C-Level Executives: 35%,Director Level: 25%, and Others: 40% By region: NorthAmerica: 45%, Europe: 20%, APAC: 30%, and RoW: 5%

The major vendors in the global IoT security market includeInternational Business Machines Corporation (IBM), Cisco Systems Inc. (Cisco), Infineon Technologies AG (Infineon), Intel Corporation (Intel), Symantec Corporation (Symantec), Gemalto NV (Gemalto), Allot (Allot), Fortinet, Inc. (Fortinet), Zingbox(Zingbox), Mocana(Mocana), SecuriThings(SecuriThings), CENTRI Technology (CENTRI), Armis, Inc., (Armis), ForgeRock (ForgeRock), and NewSky Security (NewSky).

Research Coverage:The report includes an in-depth competitive analysis of the key players in the IoT security market, along with their company profiles, recent developments, and key market strategies.The report segments the global IoT securitymarket by component, type, solution,services,application area, and region.

Key Benefits of Buying the Report:The report wouldprovide the market leaders/new entrants in the IoT security market with information about the closest approximations of the revenue numbers for the overall IoT security market and its subsegments.The report would also help stakeholders understand theircompetitors better and gain more insights to better position their businesses and plan suitable go-to-market strategies.

It also helps stakeholders understand the pulse of the market and provides them with informationaboutkey market drivers, restraints, challenges, and opportunities.

Read the full report: https://www.reportlinker.com/p04975555/?utm_source=GNW

About ReportlinkerReportLinker is an award-winning market research solution. Reportlinker finds and organizes the latest industry data so you get all the market research you need - instantly, in one place.

__________________________

Read more from the original source:
The global Internet of Things (IoT) security market size is expected to grow from USD 12.5 billion in 2020 to USD 36.6 billion by 2025, at a Compound...

22nd annual Wheatheart Wheat Conference to be online | AgriLife Today – AgriLife Today

The 22nd annual Wheatheart Wheat Conference for all area wheat producers will be online from 9-11 a.m. Aug. 6, using internet conferencing. Hosting the event are multiple Texas A&M AgriLife Extension Service county offices.

We decided to go online this year due to the virus concerns and also to give these producers the opportunity to get this information easier by not having to come in to a meeting, said Scott Strawn, AgriLife Extension agricultural and natural resources agent for Ochiltree County. Producers can use a laptop, a mobile device such as a phone or tablet, or they can use their desktop computer at home to participate.

Participants must register and obtain the conference link by Aug. 4. Registration is $10. There will be a drawing for a $100 gift card sponsored by Texas Wheat Producers for those registered and logged in.

The topics and guest speakers will be Wheat Market Outlook and Marketing Strategies with Mark Welch, Ph.D., AgriLife Extension grain marketing economist, College Station, and Wheat Variety Selection with Jourdan Bell, Ph.D., AgriLife Extension agronomist, Amarillo. The results of the area wheat variety trials will also be shared.

To register or for more information, contact any of the following AgriLife Extension agents: Strawn, 806-435-4501, scott.strawn@ag.tamu.edu; J.R. Sprague, Lipscomb, 806-862-4601, jr.sprague@ag.tamu.edu; Matt Whiteley, Hansford, 806-659-4130, matt.whiteley@ag.tamu.edu; Kristy Slough, Hutchinson, 806-878-4026, klslough@ag.tamu.edu; or Sterling Scott, Roberts, 806-868-3191, sterling.scott@ag.tamu.edu.

-30-

Excerpt from:
22nd annual Wheatheart Wheat Conference to be online | AgriLife Today - AgriLife Today

WISeKey Appoints Ben Stump as Chief Revenue Officer to Drive the Next Phase of its Global Growth – GlobeNewswire

WISeKey Appoints Ben Stump as Chief Revenue Officer to Drive the Next Phase of its Global Growth

Geneva, Switzerland July 27, 2020: WISeKey International Holding Ltd. (WISeKey) (SIX: WIHN, NASDAQ: WKEY), a leading global cybersecurity and IoT company, announced today that it has appointed Ben Stump as its Chief Revenue Officer with global responsibility for sales and marketing. Mr. Stump brings nearly 25 years of experience and proven success in sales, marketing, innovation and technology.

Ben is an accomplished leader with deep industry expertise who is a welcomed addition to our executive leadership team, said Carlos Moreira,WISeKeysFounder and CEO. His leadership experience in Digital Transformation, IoT ecosystems and Brand Protection, coupled with his strategic sales approach will deliver market leading solutions that provide tangible ROI for our customers as we collectively continue the digital transformation.

Mr. Stump was most recently WISeKeys VP of Business Development, Brand Protection & Customer Engagement for the U.S. Prior to joining WISeKey, Mr.Stumpwas Chief Technology Officer at OpSec Security where he developed and implemented OpSecs digital transformation and introduced SaaS offers for supply chain management with blockchain technology, consumer engagement and license management, as well as managed service offers for online brand protection. Prior to OpSec, he held executive management positions with Westell Technologies, Kentrox, Digicel, and Telcordia.

WISeKey is at the leading edge of delivering unique solutions that bring the IoT to secure life, said Mr. Stump. The combination of secure semiconductors, secure digital identities and value-added applications gives WISeKey an unparalleled and unique position in the market and I am excited to continue to be part of the Companys growth and success in delivering innovative solutions.

About WISeKeyWISeKey (NASDAQ: WKEY; SIX Swiss Exchange: WIHN) is a leading global cybersecurity company currently deploying large scale digital identity ecosystems for people and objects using Blockchain, AI and IoT respecting the Human as the Fulcrum of the Internet. WISeKey microprocessors secure the pervasive computing shaping todays Internet of Everything. WISeKey IoT has an install base of over 1.5 billion microchips in virtually all IoT sectors (connected cars, smart cities, drones, agricultural sensors, anti-counterfeiting, smart lighting, servers, computers, mobile phones, crypto tokens etc.). WISeKey is uniquely positioned to be at the edge of IoT as our semiconductors produce a huge amount of Big Data that, when analyzed with Artificial Intelligence (AI), can help industrial applications to predict the failure of their equipment before it happens.

Our technology is Trusted by the OISTE/WISeKeys Swiss based cryptographic Root of Trust (RoT) provides secure authentication and identification, in both physical and virtual environments, for the Internet of Things, Blockchain and Artificial Intelligence. The WISeKey RoT serves as a common trust anchor to ensure the integrity of online transactions among objects and between objects and people. For more information, visitwww.wisekey.com.

Press and investor contacts:

Disclaimer:This communication expressly or implicitly contains certain forward-looking statements concerning WISeKey International Holding Ltd and its business. Such statements involve certain known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, which could cause the actual results, financial condition, performance or achievements of WISeKey International Holding Ltd to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. WISeKey International Holding Ltd is providing this communication as of this date and does not undertake to update any forward-looking statements contained herein as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.This press release does not constitute an offer to sell, or a solicitation of an offer to buy, any securities, and it does not constitute an offering prospectus within the meaning of article 652a or article 1156 of the Swiss Code of Obligations or a listing prospectus within the meaning of the listing rules of the SIX Swiss Exchange. Investors must rely on their own evaluation of WISeKey and its securities, including the merits and risks involved. Nothing contained herein is, or shall be relied on as, a promise or representation as to the future performance of WISeKey.

Read the original post:
WISeKey Appoints Ben Stump as Chief Revenue Officer to Drive the Next Phase of its Global Growth - GlobeNewswire

Why Portland Became the Test Case for Trumps Secret Police – The Nation

Federal officers walk through tear gas while dispersing a crowd of about a thousand people during a protest in Portland, Ore. (Nathan Howard / Getty Images)

Subscribe now for as little as $2 a month!

A major American city has been taken over by violent anarchists, according to the Trump administration and right-wing news. Portland, Ore., is a city under siege, the acting secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, Chad Wolf, said last week. On Thursday, Wolf visited Portland to see for himself the lawless destruction, which is allegedly so dire as to warrant the deployment of federal forces, who have spent the last few weeks teargassing, beating, and temporarily kidnapping protesters. Fox Newss Sean Hannity decried constant chaos; Tucker Carlson claimed the whole city had been destroyed by the mob.Ad Policy

This would be alarming stuff, if it were true. Portland, where I live, has been the site of ongoing protests against police brutality and racism since the death of George Floyd in Minneapolis, a 54-day stretch of activism as of this writing. Over the past two months, mostly peaceful demonstrators have filled bridges, parks, and Interstate 84, sometimes numbering in the thousands. In what is now a predictable pattern, each night a group converges near the Justice Center and Federal Courthouse downtown. Usually small provocationstossed water bottles or fireworks or a Granny Smith apple with a bite out of itspark a wave of violence from law enforcement. Occasionally, there have been more overt acts of vandalism, particularly in the immediate wake of Floyds death, including broken windows and small fires. (For more detailed timelines of the protests in Portland from local reporters, read this and this.)

But the city is hardly wracked by chaos. Outside of the few square blocks downtown that are marked by graffiti, boarded-up windows, and metal fencing, things feel normalor rather, as normal as possible given the impact of Covid-19, which has had a far more disruptive effect than have the protests. The bulk of the violence cited by Wolf amounted to graffiti and other property damage. Meanwhile, his agents and other federal officers have seriously injured a number of protesters, including a Navy veteran who had his hand broken by federal officers after he tried talking to them. The mood in the crowd downtown is often jovialat least until law enforcement arriveswith people dancing and chanting and giving out vegan stew, barbecue, and donated bike helmets. On Friday night around 10:30 pm, shortly after federal forces started spraying tear gas, filling a city block with noxious fumes, a few families were strolling by shuttered storefronts just a few blocks away, apparently unaffected by the siege.

Federal agents showed up in Portland in early July, after Trump signed an executive order protecting statues and monuments from criminal violence during racial justice protests. In response, the Department of Homeland Security created a task force to surge resources. Ostensibly, federal forces are in Portland to protect federal property, including the courthouse. But their primary effect has been to escalate violence. On July 11, a deputy with a tactical unit of the US Marshals Service shot a demonstrator named Donavan LaBella in the head with an impact munition, fracturing his skull. On July 16, reporters for Oregon Public Broadcasting reported that federal agents were grabbing people on the street and pulling them into unmarked cars.

I am basically tossed into the van. And I had my beanie pulled over my face so I couldnt see and they held my hands over my head, Mark Pettibone, one of the people detained, told OPB. While Pettibone had been at the demonstration that night, he was on his way home when he was whisked away. I just happened to be wearing black on a sidewalk in downtown Portland at the time. As The Nations Ken Klippenstein reported, the agency responsible for Pettibones detention was the Border Patrol Tactical Unit (BORTAC), a SWAT team-style unit officially charged with responding to terrorist threats.

A number of lawsuits have been filed against the federal government for civil rights violations, and protests that had dwindled to a hundred people or so are now drawing thousands to downtown. Things had been in fact kind of winding downuntil the federal police force or whatever it is, Im still not quite sure, came in and literally blew things up, said Multnomah County Commissioner Sharon Meieran, who joined the demonstrations over the weekend and on Tuesday night. Theyre responding with this horrific amount of force that is causing so much trauma and injury to what had been relatively minor acts of, at the very worst, vandalism of property.

How did a city of 653,000 become the testing ground for what Trump has suggested will be broader interference in US citiespart of an election-year strategy to stoke fear and advance an authoritarian vision of law and order? The groundwork for federal intervention in Portland was laid long before this summers protests by right-wing groups and media, which turned the city into a bogeyman. While Oregon has a legacy of state-sanctioned racism and is still home to a disproportionately large number of hate groups, Portland has also long been the site of antifascist organizing and other left protest movements. (Demonstrations in Portland against George H.W. Bush between 1989 and 1991 were so notorious that a member of the administration dubbed the city Little Beirut.) Extreme groups like the Proud Boys and Patriot Prayer have repeatedly targeted the city over the past few years, holding rallies that inevitably drew counterprotests and created media spectacles.Current Issue

Subscribe today and Save up to $129.

Demonstrations in Portland immediately following Trumps election in 2016 were huge and, at times, explosive, with police deploying tear gas, flash grenades, and rubber bullets in response. The following year, days after a white supremacist stabbed and killed two people on Portlands light rail, the alt-right group Patriot Prayer held a Trump Free Speech Rally rally; police responded to by detaining hundreds of counterdemonstrators. Similar incidents occurred throughout 2017 and repeatedly in the years since, and conservative media eagerly latched onto a narrative of Portland as lawless anarchist enclave. National Review, for instance, devoted a cover in 2018 to a story by Kevin Williamson in which he described anti-fascist goons and thugs as being in effective control of Portland. In July 2019, clashes between the alt-right and counterdemonstrators drew attention from Trump (Portland is being watched very closely Hopefully the Mayor will be able to properly do his job, he tweeted) and prompted Texas Senator Ted Cruz to call for federal prosecutiona premonition of what was to come.

Portlands drawn the fascination and ire of a lot of right-wing media personalities, fascist groups, neo-Nazi groups, and of course the president, said attorney Juan Chavez, who directs the civil rights project at the Oregon Justice Resource Center and is involved in litigation against the city of Portland regarding treatment of protesters. Were a big enough city to matter but small enough to be a laboratory for a lot of these tactics. And exacerbating this is the way our city government has portrayed protesters in the past, and the way Portland police have portrayed protesters in the past and currently.

City leaders have been sharply critical of the federal response, and have demanded that the Trump administration remove its officers. But Chavez and some activists say that the initial response to citywide protests by local politicians and police helped grease the skids for federal intervention. For weeks, Mayor Ted Wheeler, also serving as police commissioner, did little to restrict the polices use of tear gas and impact munitions against protesters and journalists beyond issuing statements of concern and loose directives with unclear enforcement mechanisms. (A temporary restraining order issued by a federal judge and a new state law restricting tear gas use did eventually put pressure on the bureau to justify its uses of force.) Now, Portland police appear to be coordinating with federal officers to disperse crowds downtown. Portland Police Association President Daryl Turner met with Wolf during his visit to Portland, and in a press conference over the weekend parroted the claim that the city is under siege by rioters.

Basically, you had thousands of people hitting the streets and getting met with tear gas, impact munitions, and harsh police tactics, and that really set the tone for where we were going, said Chavez. I think the city didnt grasp what they were dealing with. There was an immediate political response, that while it came quickly it wasnt adequate. And because of that, basically people did not feel like they had adequate civic feedback on their demands.Related Article

While the city implemented some reforms this yearremoving police from public schools, disbanding the controversial Gun Violence Reduction Team, and reallocating $15 million from the bureaus budgetmany activists wanted a deeper transformation. They ignored us, they did not center victims or protesters, they did nothing to de-escalate, they did nothing to engage, said Teressa Raiford, the founder and executive director of Dont Shoot PDX, which has been organizing for police reform in Portland for years and in June filed a class-action lawsuit against the city for indiscriminate use of tear gas. That is why Donald Trump took advantage of the situation. He knows exactly whats happening here in Oregon. Its a shame. Its disgusting.

Despite the public attention to the demonstrations and apparent public support for the Black Lives Matter movement, Raiford said that immediate safety issues for Black residents are still going unaddressed. On July 10, for instance, an 18-year-old named Shai-India Harris was shot and killed while walking down the street in southeast Portland. Police have not arrested anyone in her case.

Its not clear how all of this will end. Appearing on Fox News on Monday, Wolf said that the DHS was not going to back down. Neither are the protesters. The entire community, the entire city is on our sideeverybody from nurses to teachers to children to parents to families that have lost their loved ones, great grandmas, Raiford said. The most immediate questions concern the extent to which the violence will escalate. Longer term, Chavez wonders about the legal endgame. Can and will the federal courts allow this type of federal invasion of a state? In a lot of ways I think were in uncharted constitutional territory, he said. Even if the courts do act, it may not be fast enough to protect the people who will be out in the streets again tonight.

Visit link:
Why Portland Became the Test Case for Trumps Secret Police - The Nation

How Brooks Brothers Became a Symbol of What Not to Wear to the Revolution – TownandCountrymag.com

When Patricia and Mark McCloskey stormed out of their lavish St. Louis mansion in a wild-eyed, class-war lather, brandishing guns aimed at nearby Black Lives Matter activists, they committed one of the most risibly deplorable, meme-birthing acts of socio-political optics since U.C. Davis police officer Lt. John Pike pepper-sprayed a seated group of students protesting with the Occupy movement in 2011.

Firearm enthusiasts on Twitter mocked the McCloskeys inexpert gun-handling, and armchair fashion pundits, like myself, couldnt help but notice their chosen uniform for the outburstMarks pink polo shirt and light khakis, and Patricias French boating chemise and capri leggings. When they were inevitably declared the champion Ken and Karen of the summer, they also unwittingly pulled a 202-year-old symbol of American normcore into a national polemic by turning it into the label of the un-woke.

The timing of the St. Louis incident couldnt have been worse, as the company, the countrys oldest apparel brand, filed for bankruptcy shortly thereafter due to a variety of financial and market reasons. Here was another stain on its otherwise crisp chinos, its long-held place in the public consciousness as the definition of fashion safety for the conservative class, now an emblem of toxicity.

Photo by Bill Greenblatt/UPIAlamy

The psychology and semiotics of fashion dictate that in times of turmoil, your personal style is especially burdened with the symbolic history of your commercial choices, for good or ill. In the late 1960s, clothing was just one of the aesthetic battlegrounds for the visual opposition of us vs. them, between the John Birch Society and Phyllis Schlafly on the one hand, and the anti-war activists who stopped shaving their armpits and went commando under their ponchos.

Now, the playing field is a lot more complicatedtraditional symbols of conformity or anarchy are being further warped by the participants in the frontlines of the culture wars.

The Hawaiian shirt was once an innocent staple of summer, Margaritaville and endless boogie guitar solos. Now, its caught a case of political COVID and must be quarantined since being co-opted by 8chan gun enthusiasts called Boogaloo Bois, a disparate group of heavily armed anti-government militia-types.

Some of them abhor immigration; some believe there is a white genocide happening, and others are eager to incite a civil war to defend their rights to carry M4 rifles into a Wendys. Reece Jones, an author and a professor at the University of Hawaii, went viral on Twitter earlier with a thread explaining the connection.

This content is imported from Twitter. You may be able to find the same content in another format, or you may be able to find more information, at their web site.

Along with Brooks Brothers and Robin Williams shirts, some previously inoffensive basics of womens fashion have also acquired a suspicious patina. Is a sheath still alright to wear, or a wallpaper print dress for that matter? When worn at the White House lectern by Press Secretary Kayleigh McEnany, they become something else, implements in a broader campaign of disinformation.

The array of body-con outfits at her briefings suggests at first a Tracy Flick-ish brand of intensity but its as transparent a costume as some of her specious talking points. I will never lie to you, she said during her first appearance in the role. And then, of course, she proceeded to lie straight to the cameras, constantly, as if it was part of a sorority hazing stunt.

JIM WATSONGetty Images

Win McNameeGetty Images

Clothes are not the only politicized aspect of our appearances nownor were they ever; hair is also a prominent battleground. During the French Revolution, Marie Antoinettes signature powdered pouf was copied by the bourgeoisie, but it was reviled by the starving sans-culottes, who saw it as a wasteful indulgence, another representation of her to loucheness and profligacy.

A more modern hairdo once popular with hipsters is the shaved/faded sides and long-on-top look, or grown-out high and tight once favored by everyone from Macklemore to David Beckham. That, too, has been appropriated by far-right figurehead Richard Spencer and his ilk, who have taken to wearing it with Brooks Brothers suits, because Nazis used to wear the hairdo to look tidy under their helmets.

The New York Times once dubbed it the Hitler Youth, but it has since gone on to be nicknamed the Fashy Haircutshort for fascist, natchand some of its adherents seem blithely unaware of the politics telegraphed by their coiffure. In 2016, the Washington Post once noted the irony of white nationalists sporting a hairstyle thats already been repurposed in the 21st century by young people whose ethos is radical safe-space inclusiveness, not ethnophobic separatism with eugenic undertones.

In the context of today, that misdirection is precisely the point. The alt-right has intentionally become more sophisticated about blending in, substituting red tank tops and MAGA hats with more ambivalent iconography, the kind of fungible avatars that can be taken at face value, or interpreted as dog whistles if weaponized.

Getty Images

Arguably, another head of hair that looks suspect in the current climate is worn by perennially corporate hyper-conservatives like Jared Kushner. Its the third-grade-picture-day, combover haircut that announces you have a turtle in your lunchbox and get to wear big boy pants because you havent wet the bed in weeks. Its hair that looks excessively Boy Scouty and feckless precisely because it isnt, like when predatory octopods camouflage themselves by mimicking the ocean floor.

For maximum due diligence, ask yourself a few difficult questions before opting for the old standbys when getting dressed for your next Zoomtinis. Remember that something that looks safe on the surface rarely is. We must all make sacrifices during times of (culture) war, but dressing in flip flops and pajama bottoms is arguably better than walking out of your house looking like you want to annex the Sudetenland.

The McCloskeys, by the way, are looking at a possible felony for what the Circuit Attorneys Office in St. Louis called unlawful use of a gun in an angry or threatening manner. The fashion police, however, has not yet pressed charges, though a guilty verdict seems like a foregone conclusion.

This content is created and maintained by a third party, and imported onto this page to help users provide their email addresses. You may be able to find more information about this and similar content at piano.io

This commenting section is created and maintained by a third party, and imported onto this page. You may be able to find more information on their web site.

Continued here:
How Brooks Brothers Became a Symbol of What Not to Wear to the Revolution - TownandCountrymag.com