Mediaboss Marketing

PEARL RIVER, N.Y., Dec. 19, 2019 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Hudson Technologies, Inc. (HDSN) today announced that it has entered into a new revolving credit facility with Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, which provides up to $60 million in borrowing capacity from time to time, subject to a borrowing base. In conjunction with entry into the Wells Fargo credit facility, the Company repaid in full its revolving loans from PNC Bank, National Association and the revolving credit facility with PNC Bank was terminated. Furthermore, on December 19, 2019 Hudson entered into a Waiver and Fourth Amendment to its Term Loan Credit and Security Agreement (the Fourth Amendment).

Kevin Zugibe, Chairman and CEO of Hudson Technologies, stated, We are pleased to have entered into a new revolving credit facility as well as to have successfully amended our existing term loan facility. We appreciate the support of our new and existing lending partners and the patience of our shareholders as we finalized these agreements and we look forward to driving improved operating performance as we enter 2020.

The Fourth Amendment waived financial covenant defaults at June 30, 2019 and September 30, 2019 and amended the Term Loan Credit and Security Agreement to reset the maximum total leverage ratio financial covenant through December 31, 2021; reset the minimum liquidity requirement; and added a minimum LTM adjusted EBITDA covenant.

Additional details regarding the new revolving credit facility, the Fourth Amendment to the term loan facility, and related matters, will be provided in a Form 8-K to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

About Hudson Technologies

Hudson Technologies, Inc. is a leading provider of innovative and sustainable solutions for optimizing performance and enhancing reliability of commercial and industrial chiller plants and refrigeration systems. Hudson's proprietary RefrigerantSide Services increase operating efficiency, provide energy and cost savings, reduce greenhouse gas emissions and the plants carbon footprint while enhancing system life and reliability of operations at the same time. RefrigerantSide Services can be performed at a customer's site as an integral part of an effective scheduled maintenance program or in response to emergencies. Hudson also offers SMARTenergy OPS, which is a cloud-based Managed Software as a Service for continuous monitoring, Fault Detection and Diagnostics and real-time optimization of chilled water plants. In addition, the Company sells refrigerants and provides traditional reclamation services for commercial and industrial air conditioning and refrigeration uses. For further information on Hudson, please visit the Company's web site at http://www.hudsontech.com.

Safe Harbor Statement under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995

Statements contained herein which are not historical facts constitute forward-looking statements. These include statements regarding managements intentions, plans, beliefs, expectations or forecasts for the future including, without limitation, Hudsons expectations with respect to the benefits, costs and other anticipated financial impacts of the ARI transaction; future financial and operating results of the Company; the Companys ability to remain in compliance with the financial covenants in its credit agreements; and the Companys plans, objectives, expectations and intentions with respect to future operations and services. Such forward-looking statements involve a number of known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of the Company to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Such factors include, but are not limited to, changes in the laws and regulations affecting the industry, changes in the demand and price for refrigerants (including unfavorable market conditions adversely affecting the demand for, and the price of, refrigerants), the Company's ability to source refrigerants, regulatory and economic factors, seasonality, competition, litigation, the nature of supplier or customer arrangements that become available to the Company in the future, adverse weather conditions, possible technological obsolescence of existing products and services, possible reduction in the carrying value of long-lived assets, estimates of the useful life of its assets, potential environmental liability, customer concentration, the ability to obtain financing, any delays or interruptions in bringing products and services to market, the timely availability of any requisite permits and authorizations from governmental entities and third parties as well as factors relating to doing business outside the United States, including changes in the laws, regulations, policies, and political, financial and economic conditions, including inflation, interest and currency exchange rates, of countries in which the Company may seek to conduct business, the Companys ability to successfully integrate ARIs operations and any assets it acquires from other third parties into its operations, and other risks detailed in the Company's 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018 and other subsequent filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Examples of such risks and uncertainties specific to the ARI transaction include, but are not limited to, the possibility that the expected benefits will not be realized, or will not be realized within the expected time period. The words "believe", "expect", "anticipate", "may", "plan", "should" and similar expressions identify forward-looking statements. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date the statement was made.

Story continues

The rest is here:
Hudson Technologies Enters Into New Revolving Credit Facility and Announces Definitive Amendments to Existing Term Loan Credit Facility - Yahoo...

Swalwell Guilty Charge Unintentionally Exposes Absurdity of Red Flag Laws

U.S.A. -(Ammoland.com)-We can only conclude that youre guilty, Rep. Eric Swalwell told CNNs Wolf Blitzer Tuesday, Fox News reports. He was trying to exploit President Donald Trumps refusal to buckle to Democrat demands on impeachment documents and witnesses.

In America, innocent men do not hide and conceal evidence, Swalwell pressed on. They are forthcoming and they want to cooperate and the president is acting like a very guilty person right now.

I believe the Fifth Amendment was just repealed on live television, Ben Williamson, communications director for Rep. Mark Meadows, tweeted in response.

Innocent men dont serve themselves up to ruthless prosecutors as a matter of basic justice. We dont give them or the police ammunition to use against us, and to detour for a moment, if you have not seen Dont Talk to the Police, featuring Professor James Duane, reserve 45 minutes to watch it soon.

Evidently Swalwell would repeal the Fourth Amendment as well if he had his druthers. Otherwise, why would innocent men require a warrant for police to search their homes?

Our entire adversarial legal system is based on the burden of proof being on the state and defendants having a presumption of innocence. Up until Opposite Day progressives started insanely turning things on their heads, the American standard was Innocent until proven guilty.

And Swalwells major league baseball player refusing a drug test analogy also falls flat. Most jobs these days, to the discredit of Americans for allowing things to devolve this way, require peeing in the cup and other surrendered invasions of privacy and dignity. Still, those are private contractual agreements either party is free to walk away from without fear of self-incrimination and prosecution by the government.

It figures Swalwell, a power freak with contempt for the Second Amendment, would view other Bill of Rights protections as impediments to getting the control he hungers for. Then again, were talking about a monster who advocated the government deploy against American gun owners with nuclear weaponsuntil he backtracked and claimed he was just making a point.

Thats some point, especially when you consider how many innocents would become collateral damage in an act of monstrous evil that only a genocidal maniac would suggest. Hence, we retain the right to keep and bear arms as the ultimate last resort safeguard of the people against tyrannical madmen. And knowing we will not surrender that power drives them howling nuts.

Still, concluding someone is guilty before they have been proven so beyond a reasonable doubt is the shaky foundation upon which the whole red flag law house of cards has been erected. And President Trump himself should be having a hoist on his own petard moment when his own words about that are thrown back at him:

Take the guns first, go through due process second.

Lewis Carrolls classic Alice's Adventures in Wonderland said it best:

No, no! said the Queen. Sentence first verdict afterwards.

Once upon a time, even a child understood the evil absurdity of that. Seeing the enactment of such edicts now being touted as commonsense by Mad Hatters with political power shows us we truly have gone down the rabbit hole and through the looking-glass.

About David Codrea:

David Codrea is the winner of multiple journalist awards for investigating/defending the RKBA and a long-time gun owner rights advocate who defiantly challenges the folly of citizen disarmament. He blogs at The War on Guns: Notes from the Resistance, is a regularly featured contributor to Firearms News, and posts on Twitter: @dcodrea and Facebook.

The rest is here:
Swalwell 'Guilty' Charge Unintentionally Exposes Absurdity of Red Flag Laws - AmmoLand Shooting Sports News

TEMPE, Ariz. Body camera video shows a man, Ivaughn Oakry, with his 1-year-old child in his arms being tased by multiple Tempe Police officers.

Oakry's attorneys sent a notice of claim seeking $5.5 million dollars for excessive use of force, trauma and a violation of Oakry's constitutional rights.

PREVIOUSLY: Video shows Tempe officers tasing domestic violence suspect while he holds 1-year-old

Tempe police were responding to a domestic violence call in June of this year.

Stop touching me, A woman can be heard saying on the 911 call. She would be outside the apartment when police arrived.

Officers went into the apartment when Oakry opened the door.

As the officer attempted to detain Oakry, he backed into his residence, telling the officer he did not want him there.

This officer didnt have a warrant to enter that home. He had no reason to be in that home," said Heather Hamel, Oakry's attorney.

Hamel said the officer was violating Oakry's Fourth Amendment rights by entering the building. Hamel pointed to an analysis by an outside police expert which said the entrance was unlawful.

Hamel further said the use of force against Oakry was unreasonable.

It is never acceptable to tase someone holding a 1-year-old child," Hamel said.

The notice of claim alleges officers did not need to tase at all, let alone three tasers at once. The notice of claim points to a training slide show they allege Tempe has used in the past, telling officers to be "predators not prey."

We brought the video to retired Phoenix Police officer Andy Anderson, who now serves as a police expert. He did not see things the same as Oakry's attorney.

He opens the doorthey have reasonable suspicion to believe he is the individual she has described and her three children are in that home, Anderson said. This isnt something officers train for with an individual who picked up a child while someone is pointing a taser at them.

Earlier this year, the Tempe Police Department said they did not believe its officers used excessive force. The officers involved were only sent to additional training.

Instead, Tempe Police chief Sylvia Moir pointed the finger at the father who picked up his 1-year-old child.

"He made a choice to bring violence into that home," Moir said

Read the original:
Man tased with 1-year old in arms set to sue for $5.5 million - 12news.com KPNX

IOWA CITY A former University of Iowa police officer and Air National Guard member who said he was wrongfully fired just before his deployment is back on the job after being officially reinstated earlier this month.

Nearly 20 months after being fired in May 2018 for what the UI characterized as an illegal dorm search, Jeff Williams, 32, is listed in the UI directory as a police officer III, the highest-earning police rank behind sergeant and lieutenant.

His attorney, Skylar Limkemann, said Williams was officially reinstated Dec. 1, although his first day back was Dec. 2. Before his termination, he had been working since July 2016.

Jeff is a dedicated public servant, Limkemann said in a statement. He is happy to be serving the community again.

UI officials confirmed Williams reinstatement at the same level as when he was terminated, reporting his salary of $50,404 also remains the same.

The university and Williams attorney provided The Gazette with differing takes on his reinstatement, with Limkemann saying an arbitrator found no just cause to terminate his employment and UI officials saying the arbitrator found Williams did in fact conduct an illegal search.

But, according to the university, the arbitrator determined termination for a first-time offense was too severe and instead ordered Williams suspended without pay for six months. Having been off the job for a year-and-a-half, Williams was reinstated.

ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW ADVERTISEMENT

The University of Iowa terminated Jeff Williams following an investigation that resulted in a founded complaint of an improper search and seizure and additional violations of departmental standards of conduct, UI spokeswoman Anne Bassett said in a statement. It was not related to his deployment.

Following his termination, Williams filed a grievance with the union which proceeded to arbitration along with a court action accusing the UI of violating his veterans preference rights, which Johnson County District Court Judge Andrew Chappell still is considering.

Williams in his action filed in May 2018 against UI Public Safety Director Scott Beckner and Capt. Mark Bullock accused them of denying his rights as a U.S. military veteran by, among other things, terminating him without due notice, a statement of charges or facts, or a full and complete hearing.

In addition to wanting his job back, Williams is seeking back pay, seniority and benefits, attorney costs and fees, and to have the discipline expunged from his record.

Chappell is expected to decide the case in the new year, after hearing most of the testimony on Williams suit Oct. 31.

UI police Chief Lucy Wiederholt completed the cases trial testimony last week.

Although Williams complaint focused on allegations UI officials violated his veterans rights and due process, he testified at length during his trial about the universitys counter punch that he acted inconsistent with UI Police Department policies and philosophy and intentionally violated students Fourth Amendment protection against warrantless searches and seizures.

Officer Williams had no intention of obtaining the necessary search warrant because it would require too much work, according to a university summary of its decision to terminate him, referencing a comment captured by Williams body camera in which he said, I just dont want to have to come back.

Williams conceded he had no plans to seek a warrant but offered an alternative explanation. As part of his abbreviated field training as a new UI officer in 2016, Williams said he was told officers cant pursue charges if a residence hall staffer already entered a dorm room and found paraphernalia.

ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW ADVERTISEMENT

The explanation, according to Williams, was that a judge had previously found hall staff to be agents of the state meaning their entrance into a room without consent constituted an illegal search.

Essentially, they tainted the scene, and I could not charge for any drug charges once they entered the room and found that stuff, Williams said.

UI officials declined to answer questions from The Gazette about whether its police have cut down on drug-related charges in dorms or provided new guidance to officers.

On-campus drug arrests, though, have plummeted in recent years, according to annual UI public safety reports, dropping from 59 drug arrests on campus in 2015 including 34 in on-campus housing to eight on-campus arrests in 2017, including just one in campus housing.

In 2018, UI police made 12 on-campus drug abuse arrests including three in campus housing.

When Williams on April 14, 2018, responded to Catlett Residence Hall for a smell of marijuana and learned hall staff already had entered and found contraband in the suspect dorm room which was locked and empty at the time he testified that he assumed he couldnt press charges.

They tried to make contact with anyone in the room, and no one answered the door, so they keyed in to the room and found items of paraphernalia and alcohol and things like that and they took those items and moved them to the center of the room, he testified.

Even with charges off the table, Williams said he had safety concerns.

Honestly, it was rather concerning to me that the entire floor of a brand-new dorm building reeked of marijuana, he said, adding his subsequent search uncovered a butane canister and lighter. I dont know if theyre bound to start fire or anything like that. There are thousands of kids who live in that building, and it was just a huge safety concern to me.

Williams testified he confiscated items that concerned him under a community caretaker exception to the Fourth Amendment although he didnt mention that justification during the search, according to court documents of evidence captured by his body camera.

ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW ADVERTISEMENT

That camera audio, according to court documents, indicated Williams mentioned his coming deployment in justifying the search.

I leave for deployment in a few days so if they want to throw a fit over me, then they have to wait a while to deal with it, he said, according to court records.

Although UI officials declined to answer questions about whether the Department of Public Safety tells officers they cant pursue charges if a hall staffer has entered a room and found drugs, officials pointed to a policy mandating residence advisers knock, ask to enter and not touch anything when responding to a smell of marijuana.

In all caps, that policy states, If a resident is not present, you cannot check their personal belongings.

Comments: (319) 339-3158; vanessa.miller@thegazette.com

More:
University of Iowa officer fired over 'improper search' gets his job back - The Gazette

The House of Representatives voted 385 to 41 in favor of the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement on trade, which the Senate is expected to act on in the new year, according to the Washington Post.

U.S. Attorney John Durham, who was tapped by Attorney General Bill Barr to investigate the origins of the Russia investigation, has requested emails and other documents to examine the role of former C.I.A. Director John Brennan in assessing Russias election interference in 2016, reports the New York Times.

The Post reports that multiple former officials believe President Trumps views on Ukrainian interference in the 2016 election might have been influenced by Russian President Vladimir Putin.

On Friday, the Suffolk County district attorneys office in New York is expected to announce criminal charges against 96 individuals involved with the MS-13 street gang, according to the Times. The charges include seven murder conspiracies and widespread drug trafficking and weapons sales.

In the United Kingdom, members of parliament voted 358 to 234 in favor of Boris Johnsons bill to leave the European Union on Jan. 31, reports the BBC. The bill will be debated further in early January.

Lebanons president appointed Hassan Diab, a professor and former education minister, as the new prime minister in the midst of ongoing protests and a financial crisis in the country, reports the Times.

An unidentified gunman killed one officer and wounded five others outside of the Federal Security Service building in Moscow on Thursday, reports NBC News.

The Times reports that companies are tracking and storing the movements of tens of millions of smartphone users through apps that share locations.

ICYMI: Yesterday on Lawfare

Torey L. McMurdo discussed the significant gaps in legal protections for service members in academia.

Stewart Baker shared a special edition of the Cyberlaw Podcast in which Bob Litt, David Kris and Bobby Chesney discuss the recent Justice Department inspector generals report.

Jeff Kosseff explained why Congress passed Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act in the first place since Congress is now considering changes.

Jen Patja Howell shared the latest episode in the Arbiters of Truth podcast series, in which Alina Polyakova and Quinta Jurecic spoke to Peter Pomerantsev, an author and research fellow at Johns Hopkins University, about the origins of Russian disinformation.

Gordon Ahl posted an appellate ruling on FISA Section 702 surveillance that considered the possibility of a fourth amendment claim for certain database queries.

Email the Roundup Team noteworthy law and security-related articles to include, and follow us on Twitter and Facebook for additional commentary on these issues. Sign up to receive Lawfare in your inbox. Visit our Events Calendar to learn about upcoming national security events, and check out relevant job opening on our Job Board.

Read this article:
Today's Headlines and Commentary - Lawfare