Archive for December, 2019

Russia plans to replace unreliable Wikipedia with its own version – MIT Technology Review

The news: Russias government has confirmed plans to set up an online version of its national encyclopedia, after President Vladimir Putin said last month that Wikipedia is unreliable and should be replaced. The government said this will ensure that Russian citizens can go online to find reliable information that is constantly updated on the basis of scientifically verified sources of knowledge.

The details: Specifically, it will be an online version of the Great Russian Encyclopedia (the successor to the Soviet Unions official encyclopedia), volumes of which have been published from 2004 to 2017. The Russian authorities have set aside a budget of about 2 billion rubles ($31 million), Sergei Kravets, an editor for the Great Russian Encyclopedia, told the Russian news agency TASS last month. The government will also set up a national research and education center for the Great Russian Encyclopedia, according to an official resolution.

Some context: The announcement can be seen as part of a wider push by the Russian government to exert more control over what its citizens see and do online. The ultimate goal is to make Russias internet independent from global structures and able to withstand attacks from abroad, as per a new law that came into force on November 1. Its also part of an official push to prioritize Russian-made products and services above others. New legislation passed this week will require manufacturers of smartphones, computers, and other devices to ensure that they come with Russian-made software installed.

A bit of history: Russias government has never been a big fan of Wikipedia. It has repeatedly blocked the Russian-language version of the website since it launched in 2001. Online propaganda groups linked to the Kremlin have been caught trying to edit Wikipedia entries on the shooting down of Malaysian Airlines Flight 17 and the 2014 Ukraine conflict. And since 2012, Russian volunteers for Wikipedia have no longer been allowed to receive financial aid from abroad because of the countrys foreign agent law.

Sign up hereto our daily newsletter The Download to get your dose of the latest must-read news from the world of emerging tech.

See the rest here:
Russia plans to replace unreliable Wikipedia with its own version - MIT Technology Review

Russia to replace Wikipedia with the ‘Great Russian Encyclopaedia’ – Big Think

Wikipedia is full of unreliable information, Russian President Vladimir Putin said last month. The solution? Replace it with an electronic version of the Great Russian Encyclopaedia, an existing reference work whose content is possibly influenced by the Russian government.

"As for Wikipedia it's better to replace it with the new Big Russian Encyclopaedia in electronic form," Russian news agency RIA Novosti quoted Putin as saying at a Kremlin meeting in November. "At least that will be reliable information, presented in a good, modern way."

A government resolution said the measure will ensure that "reliable information that is constantly updated on the basis of scientifically verified sources of knowledge."

But upon the launch of encyclopedia's latest iteration, in 2017, writer Nikolai Podosokorsky told the Christian Science Monitor that while some of the pieces featured in the work were "excellent," others were shallow and biased.

"I've gone through several articles that pertain to my area of expertise, and found them quite superficial. The lists of references at the end were often extremely biased."

Of course, the new measure will also help Russia crack down even harder on citizens' internet access, a longstanding project of the Kremlin. In 2017, Russia said it plans to route 95 percent of internet traffic through its own servers by 2020. Earlier this year, Russia conducted an experiment in which it briefly disconnected itself from global servers to test how well it functioned on its self-contained internet. The test seemed designed, in part, to bolster safeguard measures in the event that Russia was attacked in an act of cyber warfare.

But it's also possible that Russia is exploring new ways to make its internet even more censored, surveilled and isolated from outside influence. In March, for example, Russia passed legislation banning the publication of "unreliable socially significant information" and content that shows "clear disrespect" for the government. Under this law, multiple people were fined for sharing a video about the lack of schools in a province of Russia, according to a report from the Russian media freedom watchdog Roskomsvoboda.

Maybe it's no wonder why Russia wants to axe Wikipedia, a crowd-sourced website that currently hosts entries like "Internet censorship in Russia", "List of journalists killed in Russia" and "Propaganda in the Russian Federation". Putin's own Wikipedia page mentions accusations that Putin had elections rigged and his critics tortured and murdered. It also has a section titled "Comparison to Hitler."

There's also a Wikipedia entry for Malaysia Airlines Flight 17, which was shot down over a part of Ukraine occupied by pro-Russian separatists in 2014. That same year, a Twitter bot that monitors edits made to Wikipedia pages found that an internet user affiliated with Russian state media changed the following sentence:

The plane was shot down by terrorists of the self-proclaimed Donetsk People's Republic with Buk system missiles, which the terrorists received from the Russian Federation.

To:

The plane was shot down by Ukrainian soldiers.

This year, international investigators accused four pro-Russian military officials of being involved in the attacks.

Russia's history of vying to maintain top-down information control at all costs dates back to the 18th century. And it makes sense, from the perspective of the few in control: The state would lose power if it's unable to control how citizens access and share information, as Niall Ferguson, MA, D.Phil., Milbank Family Senior Fellow at the Hoover Institution, told Big Think.

"[Stalin] understood that it doesn't take too many additional edges in the network to destroy the dominance of that central node. So one way of thinking about this is: imagine a pyramidal structure, imagine something kind of like a Christmas tree, and there's the big guy like the fairy on top of the Christmas tree. But imagine that on this Christmas tree the lights are just connected to the fairy, they're not connected to one another, and therefore the fairy decides if the lights go on or off. It's a peculiar kind of Christmas tree. That's essentially a hierarchical network.

It wouldn't take too many connections, as it werelateral or horizontal connectionsbetween the lights to reduce the centrality of the fairy on the tree, and ultimately you could end up illuminating the tree without needing the fairy altogether."

From Your Site Articles

Related Articles Around the Web

See original here:
Russia to replace Wikipedia with the 'Great Russian Encyclopaedia' - Big Think

Trash Heap of History exhibit spotlights 1989 fall of Communism in Romania – Vanderbilt University News

Romanian flag with Communist emblem removed was symbol of the 1989 Romanian Revolution (courtesy of the Michelson Collection)

Previously trashed items that offer insight into Romanian life during the overthrow of its totalitarian dictatorship in 1989 are on display at the Vanderbilt Divinity Library, thanks to the family of faculty member David Michelson.

The exhibition Scrounging through the Trash Heap of History: 30 Years since the Fall of Communism in Romania is displayed in six cases: two outside of the Divinity Librarys reference room and other four in the rotunda next to the office suite.

Michelson, who is an associate professor of the history of Christianity and classical and Mediterranean studies at Vanderbilt, was 14 when his father, Paul, was awarded a Fulbright Scholarship in 1989. The Michelson family relocated from the United States to Bucharest for the academic year, where they observed firsthand the violent collapse of the Communist government of Nicolai Ceauescu. The protests began on Dec. 15, 1989, in the city of Timioara, and spread to Bucharest on Dec. 21.

As anti-Communist demonstrators ransacked the partys headquarters, protestors burned and trampled propaganda and paraphernalia of the Ceauescu regime. With help from friends, the Michelson family scavenged these memorabilia as evidence of the repressive regime and the difficulty of everyday life.

The exhibit uses these discarded materials not only to tell the story of the dramatic events of 1989, but also to shed light on repression under the Ceauescu dictatorship, said David Michelson. Items in the exhibition include spent ammunition from the fighting, Romanian flags with their Communist emblems torn out, and a single shoe from a protestor believed to have been killed by the feared Securitate secret police.

We also collected books and medals that illustrate the absurd extremes of propaganda in the Golden Epoch of Ceauescu, the younger Michelson said.

Looking back, Michelson recalls watching with his father as history unfolded on the streets of Bucharest. Harrowing images from those events of 1989-90 remain vivid in my mind, he said. Seeing the violence of political repression up close has driven my interests in history and made me curious about politics, religion and how human beings treat each other in society.

He noted that while other nations behind the Iron CurtainPoland, Hungary, Czechoslovakia and East Germanytoppled oppressive regimes in 1989, the Romanian experience both before and during 1989 was particularly marked by state violence. Thirty years after the fall of the Romanian Socialist Republic, it is important to preserve the memory of its atrocities and to recognize its victims, he said.

The exhibit has been created through the work of multiple generations of the Michelson family including Anna and Joel Michelson, two of Paul Michelsons grandchildren. The curators are also grateful for the assistance of the late Sanda Romaan, a woman who never gave up hope in freedom and collected many of the discarded items.

The exhibition, which recently opened with a lecture by Paul Michelson, Distinguished Professor of History at Huntington University, will be on display through May 31, 2020. It is co-sponsored by the Jean and Alexander Heard Libraries and Vanderbilt Divinity School.

For more information, email David Michelson or call Divinity Library Exhibit Curator Charlotte Lew at 615-322-2566.

Read this article:
Trash Heap of History exhibit spotlights 1989 fall of Communism in Romania - Vanderbilt University News

Why Laos Has Been Bombed More Than Any Other Country – History

The U.S. bombing of Laos (1964-1973) was part of a covert attempt by the CIA to wrest power from the communist Pathet Lao, a group allied with North Vietnam and the Soviet Union during the Vietnam War.

The officially neutral country became a battleground in the Cold War between the United States and Soviet Union, with American bombers dropping overtwo million tons of cluster bombsover Laosmore than all the bombs dropped during WWII combined. Today, Laos is the most heavily bombed nation in history. Here are facts about the so-called secret war in Laos.

Laos is a landlocked country bordered by China and Myanmar to the North, Vietnam to the East, Cambodia to the South and Thailand and the Mekong River to the West.

Laos' proximity to China made it critical to President Eisenhower to defend against communism.

Bettmann Archive/Getty Images

Its proximity to Mao Zedongs China made it critical to Dwight D. Eisenhowers Domino Theory of keeping communism at bay. If Laos were lost, the rest of Southeast Asiawould follow,Eisenhower told his National Security Council. On the day of his farewell address in 1961, President Eisenhower approved the CIAs training of anti-communist forces in the mountains of Laos. Their mission: To disrupt communist supply routes across the Ho Chi Minh Trail to Vietnam.

Eisenhowers successors in the White House: John F. Kennedy, Lyndon B. Johnson and Richard Nixon, all approved escalating air support for the guerrilla fighters, but not publicly. The 1962 International Agreement on the Neutrality of Laos, signed by China, the Soviet Union, Vietnam, the United States and 10 other countries, forbid signees from directly invading Laos or establishing military bases there. The secret war in Laos had begun.

Long before the Cold War, Laos had a history of interference from its neighbors. Fa Ngum founded the first recorded Lao state of Lan Xang, or The Kingdom of a Million Elephants, in 1353. From 1353-1371, Fa Ngum went on to conquer most of todays Laos and parts of what is now Vietnam and Northeast Thailand, bringing Theravada Buddhism and Khmer culture from the kingdom of Angkor (in todays Cambodia) with him.

Over the centuries, his conquered neighbors fought back, and the Thai people dominated large swaths of Laos from the late 1700s to the early 1800s. What we know as Laos today was built from an assemblage of different ethnic groups with distinct languages and cultures.

A man walks past a 30+ year-old bomb crater in the middle of a village in Laos. Decades-old craters are all over the village.

Jerry Redfern/LightRocket/Getty Images

Europeans entered the fray in 1893, when France declared Laos part of French Indochina. To the French, having Laos as a protectorate was a means to control the Mekong River, a valuable trade route through Southeast Asia.

Frances grasp on Laos first slipped in 1945, when the Japanese occupied Laos in the closing days of World War II. When atomic bombs fell on Japan, Laos declared its independence under the short-lived Lao Issara (Free Laos) government of Prince Phetsarath in 1945. The French regained power the following year.

Laos achieved full independence in 1954 following the victory of communist Vit Minh leader Ho Chi Minh over the French at the bloody Battle of in Bin Ph. The ensuing Geneva Accords split Vietnam into North and South Vietnam and stipulated that the French relinquish their claims in Southeast Asia. The agreement was not signed by the United States, who feared that in the absence of French influence, Southeast Asia would fall to communist forces.

The United States watched closely as the Pathet Lao gained popularity in newly-independent Laos. The Pathet Lao was a communist group founded at Viet Minh headquarters in 1950 during the French war. Largely dependent on Vietnamese aid, their leader was Prince Souphanouvong, the Red Prince. Born to a prince of Luang Prabang and a commoner, his education in Vietnam led him to become a disciple of Ho Chi Minh and, later, to lead the opposition against his half-brother, Souvanna Phouma, who was Prime Minister of Laos five different times (from 1951-1954, 1957-1958, in 1960 and again from 1962-1972) and preferred a coalition government balancing the Pathet Lao with more conservative forces.

An armed guard (far right) standing next to (L-R)Souvanna Phouma, Neutralist Premier of the Laotian Coalition Government, his pro-communist, half-brother, Souphanouvong, and General Singkapo, commander-in chief of the Pathet Lao Army, 1963.

Bettmann Archive/Getty Images

Phoumas hold on power was tenuous at best. Under his rule, government troops and the Pathet Lao began to clash in the Northeast along the border of Vietnam. Publicly, President Kennedy announced his support for neutralizing Laosthough what neutralization looked like on paper was far different from what it was in practice.

In 1960, the CIA approached Vang Pao, a major general in the Royal Lao Army and a member of the Hmong minority in Laos, to be the chief of their secret army to push back the communist Pathet Lao. The Hmong made up an ethnic group that had originated in China and lived in the remote mountains of Laos, often in extreme poverty, and had a history of evading authority. They had been at odds with the lowland Lao majority for centuries, and the CIA exploited this history of conflict to their benefit.

Charismatic and prone to pacing while he talked, Vang Pao had experience fighting both the French and the Japanese. His followers praised him for his bravery in fighting alongside his men. The CIAs Operation Momentum armed and trained the Hmong to take on the Pathet Lao in the growing proxy war.

A ground war in Laos with U.S. forces was not on the table. President Kennedy wrote as early as 1961 that, Laosis a most inhospitable area in which to wage a campaign. Its geography, topography, and climate are built-in liabilities. Bombing Laos was seen as a safer means of cutting off communist supply lines into Vietnam before they could be used against American troops.

The U. S. and Laotian governments permitted newsmen a rare glimpse of a military base in Laos with 250-pound bombs used to fight against the North Vietnamese in northern Laos.

Bettmann Archive/Getty Images

The U.S. Air Force began bombing targets in Laos in 1964, flying planes like AC-130s and B-52s full of cluster bombs on covert missions based out of Thailand. The United States eventually dropped the equivalent of a planeload of bombs every eight minutes, 24 hours a day, for nine years, according to Al Jazeera.

The bombing focused on disrupting communist supply chains on the Ho Chi Minh Trail and Sepon (also spelled Xpn), a village near a former French air base now controlled by North Vietnam. In 1971, Sepon was the target of the failed Operation Lam Son, when the U.S. and South Vietnam attempted to block access to the Ho Chi Minh Trail.

Dave Burns, a member of the U.S. Air Forces 16 Special Operations Squadron, flew missions over Laos out of Ubon, Thailand. He recalls, Sepon was the one place in Laos that we did not want to fly into. The village was at a crossroads of three highways leading in from Vietnam: the Mu Gia Pass, the Ban Karai Pass, and the Barthelme Pass. The highways then headed south to the Ho Chi Minh Trail. It was highly defended with all sorts of anti-aircraft guns. Going there was a guarantee of being hit or being shot down.

Air America was the lifeblood of the CIAs Laos operation, transporting personnel, food and supplies to and from remote bases. As a former CIA officer explained: Wed negotiate with the tribal groups. If you dont make a deal with them, give them aid, the communists will do it, and then theyll join with the communists. The CIA set up medical facilities with doctors, started schools and offered protection from rivals.

Air America was also transporting more illicit goods. In the 1979 book Air America by Christopher Robbins, later immortalized in the fictional "Air America" movie starring Mel Gibson and Robert Downey, Jr., Robbins reports on how opium from Lao poppies was transported on American planes.

By 1975, one-tenth of the population of Laos, or 200,000 civilians and members of the military, were dead. Twice as many were wounded. Seven hundred and fifty thousand, a full quarter of the population, had become refugeesincluding General Vang Pao himself. Declassified documents show that 728 Americans died in Laos, most of whom were working for the CIA. The secret war in Laos, or the Laos Civil War to many who lived through it, set a precedent for a more militarized CIA with the power to engage in covert conflicts around the world.

Cooperative Orthotic and Prosthetic Enterprise (also known as COPE) is a learning center where visitors can inform themselves about the UXO problem in Laos.

John S Lander/LightRocket/Getty Images

In Laos, the legacy of U.S. bombs continues to wreak havoc. Since 1964, more than 50,000 Lao have been killed or injured by U.S. bombs, 98 percent of them civilians. An estimated 30 percent of the bombs dropped on Laos failed to explode upon impact, and in the years since the bombing ended, 20,000 people have been killed or maimed by the estimated 80 million bombs left behind.

In 2016, President Barack Obama became the first sitting U.S. president to visit Laos. He pledged an additional $90 million in aid to remove unexploded ordnance on top of the $100 million that had been spent previously. The work of cleaning out unexploded bombs from the soil continues.

Jessica Pearce Rotondi is the author of What We Inherit: A Secret War and a Familys Search for Answers.

View original post here:
Why Laos Has Been Bombed More Than Any Other Country - History

Special Branch to probe ‘communist gathering’ – The Star Online

PUTRAJAYA: Bukit Aman's Special Branch is investigating a recent meeting in Kajang allegedly involving former Communist Party of Malaya (CPM) members.

Home Minister Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin (pic) said the authorities were looking into whether the gathering was an attempt to revive the old partys ideology in the country.

The police and the Special Branch have been instructed to investigate the meeting. We want to find out what was the objective of the meet.

Is it merely to celebrate the Hat Yai peace agreement? Is it an attempt to revive an old spirit of communism from back then?

We cannot take these things lightly, as our country has enjoyed peace for a long time.

Let the authorities investigate first, and once we have the report, we will know if the meeting was unlawful or if it is just a harmless event, he told a press conference after attending the Immigration Department Day celebrations here Monday (Dec 2).

Muhyiddin added that as an independent country, Malaysians are not prevented from gathering but certain sentiments should not be revived.

People are free to believe in certain sentiments, I do not think we can stop that.

But we have been a peaceful nation for a long time. Is it a good thing to revive something from the past that was linked to wars and killings? he said.

A recent news report revealed that former members of the CPM had met in Kajang in conjunction with the 30th anniversary of the Hat Yai Peace Accord, which was signed on Dec 2,1989, by the Malaysian government and the party.

The meeting came close on the heels of the controversial return of CPM leader Chin Pengs ashes to Malaysia.

Article type: free

User access status: 3

More here:
Special Branch to probe 'communist gathering' - The Star Online