Archive for November, 2019

Other Voices: It was censorship by theft at a university – Lexington Dispatch

Radford University, a taxpayer-supported institution that is located in southwestern Virginia, is in a public relations hole entirely of its own making. The question is: Just how deep will the schools administrators insist on digging?

In September, roughly 1,000 copies of the Tartan, Radford's student-run newspaper, disappeared from campus news racks after having been delivered hours earlier. The next day, administrators of the university summoned the paper's editor, junior Dylan Lepore, to a meeting at which they criticized as insensitive a photo that was published on the paper's front page.

However, the schools administrators appeared surprised to hear that most of the issues had been stolen from the 22 news racks that are located around the campus.

It turns out, after what campus police called an "in-depth" investigation, that a low-level university employee who was neither administrator nor professor was caught on video and admitted stealing papers from four of the news racks, as The Washington Post's Joe Heim reported.

The administration and police won't reveal the thief's identity, although they know it; they won't charge the employee because they say taking free newspapers is not a crime; and they won't offer an explanation of who swiped the papers from 18 other news racks. Nor will they offer a motive or explanation for the theft.

The university's strategy, if you can call it that, is tailor-made to prolong the college's embarrassment, calling into question its leadership's judgment.

The photo in question upset a few administrators and faculty members, including Radford's president, Brian Hemphill, but apparently no one else; Lepore, the editor, told us he received no criticism from fellow students or on social media.

The photo depicts Steve Tibbetts, a newly hired criminal justice professor who died suddenly at age 49 a few weeks after arriving on campus, and it was given to the Tartan for publication by Tibbetts' widow. In it, Tibbetts and his daughter are standing beneath a road sign that reads "Tibbetts St." and, next to it, "Dead End."

Radford said the thief has been disciplined and that the matter, along with incriminating police video, is a closed "personnel issue." The thief was not acting on anyone's direction, a university spokesman said.

That strains credulity. It is also hard to believe the employee acted alone; when the newspaper is delivered to campus each week, it takes two hours to distribute it by golf cart to all the news racks.

Nor, as campus police suggest, does the fact that the Tartan is distributed for free mean that no crime was committed. The paper, whose publication costs include a $750 printing bill, Lepore's salary and other expenses, is an object of value, whether it is sold or given away.

The question of whether publishing the photo was tasteful is a topic of legitimate debate. Stealing two-thirds of a student newspaper's press run is an act of theft and an affront to the First Amendment.

By its stonewalling, the university suggests that it takes neither matter very seriously.

GateHouse Media

Follow this link:
Other Voices: It was censorship by theft at a university - Lexington Dispatch

WeChat users in the US say the app is censoring their messages about Hong Kong – Business Insider

Chinese American users of the messaging app WeChat are finding their messages containing political criticism of China particularly those aimed at the protests in Hong Kong are being censored, The Verge reports.

In one instance an American information security analyst named Bin Xie had his account taken down after writing "The pro-China candidates totally lost," referring to Hong Kong's recent election in which pro-democracy candidates gained huge ground against pro-China candidates.

"If you have censorship in China, fine," he told The Verge. "But in this country? I'm a Republican, but on WeChat I suffer the same as Democrats we are all censored."

Xie then joined a WhatsApp group full of Chinese Americans who had similarly been kicked off WeChat for expressing political views.

For Chinese Americans with family in China, being kicked off WeChat is a major problem. The WeChat app is more or less ubiquitous in China, where it covers a broad range of uses. It acts as a messaging app, a dominant payment platform, a social network, and a platform for accomplishing everyday tasks like paying utility bills and booking doctor's appointments. WeChat and its rival Alipay's payment systems have become so everyday that even street vendors and buskers use QR codes rather than accept cash.

Losing access to the app is a major hindrance to anyone wishing to contact Chinese relatives as popular Western messaging apps like Facebook and WhatsApp are blocked in China and for anyone who wants to visit the country.

The Verge notes that while generally WeChat applies different censorship rules to Chinese nationals and foreigners, Chinese Americans may fall through the net if they once possessed a Chinese phone number.

In a statement to Business Insider, WeChat's parent company Tencent noted that WeChat is a separate app to Weixin, which operates inside China. Tencent said WeChat and Weixin are are interoperable, describing them as "sister apps." People signing up with Chinese phone numbers would be using Weixin, while people with international numbers would use WeChat.

"Tencent operates in a complex regulatory environment, both in China and elsewhere. Like any global company, a core tenant is that we comply with local laws and regulations in the markets where we operate," a spokeswoman said.

"Weixin and WeChat use different servers, with data stored in different locations. WeChat's servers are outside of China and not subject to Chinese law, while Weixin's servers are in China and subject to Chinese law," she noted.

She added that the interoperablity between WeChat and Weixin messages could lead to "misunderstandings."

"For example, if a WeChat user sends a message to a friend using Weixin, China law applies to the Weixin user and certain content may be blocked. The same content shared between two WeChat users however, would not be blocked," she said.

The extension of Chinese censorship laws beyond its borders has become more pertinent to American citizens in recent months through three high-profile news stories.

Originally posted here:
WeChat users in the US say the app is censoring their messages about Hong Kong - Business Insider

Censorship by theft on a university campus | Editorial – Citizentribune

Radford University, a taxpayer-supported institution in southwestern Virginia, is in a public relations hole entirely of its own making. The question is how deep its administrators will insist on digging.

In September, roughly 1,000 copies of the Tartan, Radfords student-run newspaper, disappeared from campus news racks after having been delivered hours earlier. The next day, administrators summoned the papers editor, junior Dylan Lepore, to a meeting at which they criticized as insensitive a photo published on the papers front page. However, they appeared surprised to hear most of the issues had been stolen from 22 news racks around campus.

It turns out, after what campus police called an in-depth investigation, that a low-level university employee neither administrator nor professor was caught on video and admitted stealing papers from four of the news racks, as The Posts Joe Heim reported. The administration and police wont reveal the thiefs identity, although they know it; they wont charge the employee because they say taking free newspapers is not a crime; and they wont offer an explanation of who swiped the papers from 18 other news racks. Nor will they offer a motive or explanation for the theft.

The universitys strategy, if you can call it that, is tailor-made to prolong the colleges embarrassment, calling into question its leaderships judgment.

The photo in question upset a few administrators and faculty members, including Radfords president, Brian Hemphill, but apparently no one else; Lepore, the editor, told us he received no criticism from fellow students or on social media. The photo depicts Steve Tibbetts, a newly hired criminal-justice professor who died suddenly at age 49 a few weeks after arriving on campus, and it was given to the Tartan for publication by Tibbetts widow. In it, Tibbetts and his daughter are standing beneath a road sign that reads Tibbetts St. and, next to it, Dead End.

Radford said the thief has been disciplined and that the matter, along with incriminating police video, is a closed personnel issue. The thief was not acting on anyones direction, a university spokesman said.

That strains credulity. It is also hard to believe the employee acted alone; when the newspaper is delivered to campus each week, it takes two hours to distribute it, by golf cart, to all the news racks. Nor, as campus police suggest, does the fact that the Tartan is distributed for free mean that no crime was committed. The paper, whose publication costs include a $750 printing bill, Lepores salary and other expenses, is an object of value, whether it is sold or given away.

The question of whether publishing a photo was tasteful is a topic of legitimate debate. Stealing two-thirds of a student newspapers press run is an act of theft and an affront to the First Amendment. By its stonewalling, the university suggests that it takes neither matter very seriously.

-The Panama City News Herald

See the original post here:
Censorship by theft on a university campus | Editorial - Citizentribune

BBC blasted by John Challis for CENSORING Only Fools and Horses you cant say anything! – Express

TV legend John Challis criticised plans to censor classic British sitcoms like Only Fools and Horses for being offensive to modern audiences. British streaming service Britbox a subscription service led by the BBC, ITV and Channel 4 was launched earlier this month. However, its decision to censor and attach sensitivity warnings to shows that could offend modern sensibilities have drawn widespread criticism.

The bespoke warnings will label specific episodes with one Only Fools and Horses episode and almost every episode of Fawlty Towers impacted.

Only Fools and Horses star John Challis spoke out against the move during an appearance on the Jeremy Vine show this morning.

Challis questioned why it was right that a show like Only Fools and Horses, that was still enjoyed by hundreds every day, could be taken down because it offends two or three people.

He recommended that people who are offended by these programmes simply choose to not watch them.

JUST IN: Tony Blair talks down Britain saying dont hold your breath for US trade deal

Challis said yesterday: Well Only Fools and Horses still shows every day.

But, jokes in that show that used to get an enormous laugh at the time 30 years ago now dont. Is that acceptable now, or not?

Hundreds of people who watch the show I was in, and think what a relief, we can laugh at that.

What has happened to comedy now because you cant say anything that might offend one or two people. Is that right?

He also criticised that Benny Hill had been described as sexist remarking that it was just very silly.

Challis added: It is up to the person who is offended by it not to watch it!

Britbox was launched with the aim of rivalling streaming giants such as Netflix and Amazon.

However, some shows, such as Till Death Do Us Part, Love Thy Neighbour and It Aint Half Hot Mum, have been removed altogether because they contain content that is deemed racist or unacceptable.

DON'T MISS:

Sturgeon in danger as former Scottish Remainer vows 'to back Brexit' [VIDEO]Tropical Storm Sebastien to smash Britain - travel chaos warning [VIDEO]EU plot - Macron threatens to hold British fisheries hostage [VIDEO]

Till Death Do Us Part includes the bigoted character Alf Garnett, while Love Thy Neighbour features a West Indian couple who move next door to a white English couple.

An ITV spokesman added: Weve carefully selected a wide range of the very best in British programming which will appeal to viewers in 2019.

Following the launch of BritBox, a spokesman confirmed that the vast majority of British shows will disappear from Netflix within the next year.

Reemah Sakaan, the ITV executive leading Britbox, acknowledged that changing tastes were a factor in the selection process and some material had not aged well.

Excerpt from:
BBC blasted by John Challis for CENSORING Only Fools and Horses you cant say anything! - Express

Whither ‘woke’: What does the future hold for word that became a weapon? – The New European

PUBLISHED: 12:30 26 November 2019

Harriet Marsden

TOPSHOT - Demonstrators from the Black Lives Matter movement march through central London on July 10, 2016, during a demonstration against the killing of black men by police in the US. Police arrested scores of people in demonstrations overnight Saturday to Sunday in several US cities, as racial tensions simmer over the killing of black men by police. / AFP / DANIEL LEAL-OLIVAS (Photo credit should read DANIEL LEAL-OLIVAS/AFP via Getty Images)

Archant

A signifier of awareness of racial and social discrimination, the power of the word 'woke' has been eroded by over-use. HARRIET MARSDEN reports on its roots and where it is heading.

Email this article to a friend

To send a link to this page you must be logged in.

Become a Supporter

The New European is proud of its journalism and we hope you are proud of it too. If you value what we are doing, you can help us by making a contribution to the cost of our journalism

The BBC's identity correspondent Megha Mohan recently tweeted: "Note to editor; no-one in diverse circles uses the word 'woke' anymore. In fact, it's the clearest indication of the insular nature of their world if they file copy using it in 2019." Or as an ABC foreign affairs reporter, pithily responded: "That word is whiter than frightened milk."

That was almost two years to the day since the modern usage of 'woke' was added to the Oxford English Dictionary, with an updated meaning of "alert to racial or social discrimination and injustice".

Has a concept so seemingly global become an indication of insularity? Has a term derived from African American vernacular, disseminated by Black Twitter and popularised by the Black Lives Matter movement become "whiter than frightened milk"? In our current political landscape, the rise of far-right rhetoric and the backlash against progressive social values, is it even desirable to be woke?

The OED dates the term back to 1962, from a glossary of Harlem colloquialisms in a NY Times Magazine article by William Melvin Kelley: "If you're woke, you dig it." The next entry is from a 1972 play Garvey Lives! by Barry Beckham: "I been sleeping all my life. And now that Mr. Garvey done woke me up, I'm gon stay woke."

What is the word's deeper etymology? Kabria Baumgartner, assistant professor at the University of New Hampshire and specialist in 19th century African American literature, says that it reminds her of early black abolitionists who "may well be the progenitors of a version of the idea of wokeness". She cites David Walker's 1829 Appeal to the Coloured Citizens and Elizabeth Jennings Sr's 1837 speech urging her audience of black women to "awake, and slumber no more".

Often accused of being grammatically incorrect, the term is drawn from "signifyin' discourse" - the phenomenon of African American vernacular English (AAVE) speakers playfully reworking words. In this case, the concept "don't sleep" - i.e. don't miss the point - acquires a quirk of ambiguous tense to become "stay woke".

Andr Brock, a professor of black digital studies at Georgia Institute of Technology, remembers first hearing the term in the early 2000s, "thanks to a cultural touchstone of black online culture: the OkayPlayer (OKP) website", which featured many neo-soul artists: A contemporary soul revival that built on 1970s soul stars (Al Green, Marvin Gaye, Chaka Khan) to emerge alongside 1990s hip hop and R'n'B. One of the pioneers of the musical sound was the singer/songwriter, Erykah Badu.

Dr Brock, 51, explains that there were a number of social injustice moments in the 2000s when OKP was at its height, but that the site's format didn't lend itself to a larger community of activists. Instead, he says, blogs were instrumental for responding to injustices.

In 2006, six black teenagers were convicted of battery for beating up a white student after months of racial tension at Jena High School, Louisiana, where they all studied.

The following year, a 14-year-old black freshman named Shaquanda Cotton pushed a hall monitor at her Texas high school, and was sentenced to seven years in prison for "assault on a public servant". The outcry over the harsh - and, many believed, discriminatory - convictions for these black children spread across the blogosphere. This, says Dr Brock, "left impressions on a new generation of activists who became aware of the power of black online spaces to mobilise movements".

The foundations were laid for a new network of black identity - and a viral moment. In 2008, Erykah Badu released her song Master Teacher, describing a racially equal utopia, with the refrain: "I stay woke" - in other words, that is nothing but a dream. The track would provide the spark, while Twitter was the kindling for newly 'woke'.

'Stay woke' soon became shorthand for paying attention to wider structural social injustice. Badu tweeted the phrase in support of Pussy Riot, the Russian punk feminist rebels who were facing jail time for their protest performance.

By 2012, blogs had largely been replaced by Facebook while Twitter had become a space for black digital practitioners to share culture and information - known as Black Twitter.

"The concentration of black identity on a network like Twitter, which afforded a type of ritual catharsis about everyday pleasures and problems, powered a phase shift of the network from entertainment to social activism," Dr Brock explains. "Woke is a terse, powerful term to symbolise this shift, which means it worked quite well for Twitter's limited 140-character content format."

One enthusiast for the new medium was a black 17-year-old named Trayvon Martin. He tweeted thousands of times about rap music and street culture, interspersed with teenage jokes and complaints about school.

In February 2012, Martin was walking home from the 7-11, where he'd bought sweets and juice. He was spotted by a volunteer neighbourhood watchman George Zimmerman, who called the police to report Martin for seeming "suspicious".

The police told Zimmerman not to follow Martin, as they were on their way. But Zimmerman and Martin ended up in a fight, and Zimmerman shot Martin dead. That month, the name Trayvon was tweeted more than two million times. And the next summer, when Zimmerman was acquitted of second-degree murder and manslaughter, a tsunami of fury and frustration cascaded outwards from its Florida epicentre. The BlackLivesMatter movement was born.

The hashtag "stay woke" became its rallying cry: a promise to be vigilant of racial oppression, and a warning to keep safe from police brutality. BLM activists started a recruitment website called StayWoke.org. By the time Michael Brown was shot by Darren Wilson in 2014, 'woke' was firmly embedded.

"But like all black discourse terms," Dr Brock explains, "it was time limited. The mainstream picked up on 'woke' right about the time when Black Twitter was done with it and twisted it to their own ends."

Woke became part of a long history of words derived from African American slang to be adopted, or appropriated, by "non-black folk, organisations and corporations intent on virtue-signalling their allegiance to movements like Black Lives Matter", says Michael Arceneaux, a writer and essayist on race. As with other AAVE words - such as 'bred', 'bae', 'on fleek', and later 'lit' and 'shade' - many used the term without acknowledgement, or even awareness, of its origins.

Arceneaux, 35, points out that the word became inextricably linked with millennials even though it was popularised by Badu, a Gen X-er. By the end of 2015, Buzzfeed had published an article extolling the "woke bae" actor Matt McGorry (John Bennett in Orange is the New Black), because he was a "vocal feminist" who "weighed in on the Black Lives Matter movement frequently". Because he had posted topless pictures protesting Instagram's female nipple ban, and a photo holding a Jim Crow laws book and wearing a BLM bracelet.

In May 2016, woke was enshrined in cringeworthy 'youth' culture when MTV included it in a listicle of 10 slang words to know. The same month the BlackLivesMatter TV docu-film, Stay Woke had its debut, the term had been diluted to the point where it became a pseudonym for white liberal trendiness.

It was June 2016 when woke jumped its own shark. Jack Dorsey, the CEO of self-described neutral platform Twitter, was interviewed alongside BLM activist DeRay McKesson, wearing a Twitter-branded #StayWoke T-shirt. A marriage of appropriation and proto-corporate 'woke-washing': the CEO of a platform so integral to the term's activist development told the crowd that they would all receive the branded garment for free. Twitter as a company, it must be said, was anything but diverse.

Black cultural critics began to call out competitive, self-congratulatory wokeness, and white 'awareness' of inequality in place of any real action - Maya Binyam even coined the "Woke Olympics", while Charles Pulliam-Moore wrote that the term had become a derogatory jab at the very idea of staying woke. Desus Nice's tweets used #staywoke in relation to over-the-top conspiracy theories. Donald Glover's alter-ego Childish Gambino released the song Redbone in November 2016, ironically employing "stay woke" to call out infidelity. That song, also ironically, coincided with a massive spike in Google searches for the phrase.

Many on the right began to use 'woke' to disparage white liberals expressing sympathy with issues facing non-white people, and to bolster their own claims of grievance. Fraser Myers wrote admiringly for Spiked of the "anti-woke brigade". Woke had become the new "politically correct" - a term used lazily and pejoratively by anti-progressives.

Arwa Mahdawi, a Guardian US columnist, compares the trajectory with the word "triggered".

So-called 'trigger warnings', she says, were diluted by excessive and often unnecessary usage on the left, and so weaponised by the right, used to mock "snowflake millennials" and "lib tards".

Mahdawi, who has a background in advertising and brand strategy, says that she would now only use the term when describing 'woke-washing': Companies transparently allying themselves with social justice issues to court a younger demographic. Pepsi or Gillette adverts spring to mind.

By the time the word was added to the OED in 2017, then, it had already lived a full lifespan of meaning. But in fact, this was necessary for it to be chosen at all. Fiona McPherson, a senior editor on the OED new words team, explains a new word must have demonstrated "a little bit more staying power", ideally about 10 years.

"That's because we're telling the story of the word, so that's usually enough to show that a word has made an impact, that it isn't just one of those words that everybody's using for five minutes and then nobody's ever heard of again."

Woke is a key example, she says, that encapsulates the most interesting part of her job: a word which seems very 'now' has often come into play far earlier than you might think. But it needed something like Erykah Badu to popularise it, Twitter to disseminate it and an ensuing decade of appropriation to have demonstrated staying power.

In the context of our mayfly modern vernacular - the increasing burn rate of hip words as we communicate so much faster and frequently - it is theoretically possible for a word to have lived and died before it makes it to the dictionary at all, McPherson says. But it is simply too early to say whether the word woke has reached the end of its lifespan.

Dr Baumgartner says that, while the term has lost some of its cachet, she is hesitant to retire a term that "speaks to the necessity of deep social and political consciousness". If we historicise the term properly, she insists, we don't have to stop using it.

"Yes, the term has been co-opted, misused, and parodied but it can be reclaimed or our language can evolve. Either way, being active and conscious of oppression, inequality, and injustice are as important now, globally, as ever.

"If we retire or even shelve the term woke, the core remains."

This story was first published by Tortoise, a different newsroom dedicated to a slower, wiser news. Try Tortoise for a month for free at http://www.tortoisemedia.com/activate/tne-guest and use the code TNEGUEST.

The New European is proud of its journalism and we hope you are proud of it too. We believe our voice is important - both in representing the pro-EU perspective and also to help rebalance the right wing extremes of much of the UK national press. If you value what we are doing, you can help us by making a contribution to the cost of our journalism.

Read more from the original source:
Whither 'woke': What does the future hold for word that became a weapon? - The New European