Archive for August, 2017

Egypt’s government tightens authoritarian control, blocks dissenting … – Crikey (registration)

For two years between 2011 and 2013 images of protesters in Egypt were a constant feature on news channels internationally.The streets of Cairos downtown district transformed into huge waves of demonstrators, demanding thatleaders listen to the will of Egyptians. Yet walking through the traffic-clogged streets of downtown Cairo today, there is little evidence left that such extraordinary and regular demonstrations were once the norm.

The space for dissent has shrunk drastically in Egypt in recent years. Observers says the country is experiencing repression with a greater severity than what Egyptians experienced under the military dictatorship of Hosni Mubarak, who was toppled in the heady and hopeful days of Egypts revolution in 2011 by popular protest.

Ever since the revolution seemingly endedin 2013 after the presidency of Mohamed Morsi of the Muslim Brotherhood, Egypts first democratically elected president was prematurely cut short by the military following popular protests Egypt has been in the throes of a brutal and wide-ranging crackdown on dissent.

It has ensnared political opponents, activists, judges and journalists. Human Rights Watch estimates that there are at least 40,000 political prisoners languishing in Egypt. And protesting the tool through which Egyptians fought for their rights for two years has become near impossible after a law introduced in late 2013 placed restrictions on demonstrations.

There are so few left to challenge the Egyptian regimes authority, and those that are have had their ability to do so significantly crippled by the Egyptian regime. Yet the regime under President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi, who was head of the army when Morsi was removed before becoming president in 2014, has this year displayed its intent to quieten the remaining dissenting voices, no matter how debilitated they already are, marking a new phase in the crackdown.

It has been a difficult phase, one Egyptian journalist told Crikey aboutworking for Mada Masr an independent news website in Egypt. The journalist, who asked not to be named out of concerns for their safety, was referring to the blockade of websites including Mada Masr known for its critical coverage of the government which the authorities startedin May.

Whilst Mada Masr is still available through use of some proxies, and the publication has also resorted to publishing its articles on social media, the journalist admits there is uncertainty overthe publications future. We are still not certain if there is an investigation against Mada or not, and we do not know if we will ever be back online or not, theysaid.

It has turned out to be a massive assault on internet freedoms in Egypt: initially 21 news sites were blocked, including international sites like Al Jazeera and the Huffington Post Arabic, as well as Egyptian ones like Mada Masr. Since then the number of websites blocked has increased to 127, says the Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ), and has widened in scope. Its now expanded to rights groups like Reporters Without Borders and the Arabic Network for Human Rights Information as well as VPNs making it harder to access the blocked websites through other means.

While press freedoms have been significantly eroded the past few years and censorship has been on the rise, the CPJ says that online censorship was nevertheless rare in Egypt.

And its not just the media that has been targeted of late. Human Rights Watch says the internet crackdown is part of a wider effort by the regime in intensifying repression of basic freedoms in Egypt.

Since April the authorities have been arresting political activists including the prominent rights lawyer, Khaled Ali, who announced in February that he was considering challenging Sisi in next years presidential elections. As of June, 190 political activistshave been arrested.

In late April Sisi strengthened his control over Egypts courts when he ratified reforms giving himself new power to appoint the most senior members of the judiciary. The move which analysts say was done to prevent the promotion of two rebellious judges has beencriticised by judges and rights groups, who say it endangers the remaining semblance of independence in Egypts judiciary.

The following month, Sisi turned his attention to civil society. He ratified a controversial NGO law that rights groups say criminalises the work of NGOs and makes it difficult for them to operate independently. The law marks an extension on the crackdown within the NGO community to developmental organisations too, says Mohamed Zaraa, a member of the Cairo Institute for Human Rights Studies.

Several human rights organisations, including Zaraas own, have long been targeted by this regime through a long running legal investigation on charges of using foreign funding to destabilise Egypt. I think this law isnt targeting human rights organisations, but civil society at large, said Zaraa, who like many activists has been slapped with a travel ban.

Analysts say that this new phase in the repression is because Sisi is looking to consolidate his position ahead of next years presidential elections. Its widely believed to have also been timed to remove critics ahead of a controversial parliamentary vote in June on Sisis decision to cede control of two Red Sea islands to its powerful ally Saudi Arabia. The widely unpopular pact even deemed treacherous by some sparked rare street protests against the regime last year when it was announced.

Some observers suggest the President, who appears sensitive to criticism, has also been left feeling insecure about public criticism over cuts in food and fuel subsidies, and rising inflation, after last years IMF loan agreement. He has also faced criticism over his security strategy after four deadly attacks by the Islamic State group on Egypts Copts since December.

Sisi faces little pressure from Western leaders on human rights, as European powers like France, Germany, the UK and the EU itself havemoved to strengthen ties with Egypt in recent years, deeming it a vital strategic partner.

The presidency of Donald Trump, who appeared to have quickly developed a close bond with Sisi, evidenced by Trump complimenting Sisi on his nice shoes,has also given him confidence at home, says Amro Ali,professor of sociology at the American University in Cairo.

It all boils down, in large part, to the Trump effect. When Trump told Sisi nice shoes, it was a signal to Sisi, metaphorically, to use them to further trample on human rights, Ali said.

There is something banal about the Trump small talk and avoidance of serious issues (not that we have high expectations of Trump anyway) that has emboldened Egypts usual widespread crackdowns to shift gear into destroying potential, rather than actual, threats. From arresting dormant activists to blocking websites, among other things.

But in a surprise move lastweek the US cut or delayed close around $300 million in aid to Egypt. The US State Department said that this was because of the NGO law and deterioration in human rights in Egypt, though the New York Times reported this could also be down to Egypts ties to North Korea.

This may yet provide a glimmer of hope for exhausted opponents of the Sisi regime, like activist Zaraa who says international pressure is key to alleviating their plight or at least preventing it from getting even worse. If there is no [international] pressure he said, then definitely the crackdown will continue.

See the article here:
Egypt's government tightens authoritarian control, blocks dissenting ... - Crikey (registration)

News Corp doesn’t have a second television option – The Australian Financial Review

News Corpwill not be allowed to buy an Australian television network other than the Ten Network, even if media-ownership laws are changed, industry executives believe.

Despite strong opposition from media competitors, the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission approved Lachlan Murdoch's failed plan to buy the Ten Network.

Receivers PPB Advisory and administrator Korda Mentha surprised the market by agreeing to sell Ten toUS media giant CBS on Monday.

If Mr Murdoch or his family company, News Corp, wanted to buy a different television network instead they would be unlikely to get ACCC approval, industry sources said.

A source close to News Corp denied it was interested in buying the Nine Entertainment Co, which doesn't have a single large shareholder that could block the sale of the company.

Seven West Media, which owns the Seven network, is controlled by West Australian entrepreneur Kerry Stokes, who has shown no interest in selling his top-ranked television stations.

ACCC chairman Rod Sims declined to comment Tuesday but last week said Mr Murdoch was cleared to buy Ten because an alliance with News Corp's media outlets, which include most of Foxtel, Sky News and many newspapers, wouldn't have a big impact on how much news is produced.

Unlike Seven and Nine, the Ten Network doesn't have a high-rated evening news broadcast or well-read online news site, Mr Sims said.

"It might have been a different result if this had been about Channel Nine or Seven, which have a strong online presence and a much stronger evening news," he said on ABC radio.

"This decision doesn't mean let her rip. One can't draw a conclusion that similar transactions will be treated in the same way."

Even though Mr Murdoch, who is News Corp's co-chairman, planned to buy the Ten network in a personal capacity with billionaire Bruce Gordon, sources said plans were well advanced at News Corp to integrate some of Ten's operations before Monday's surprise decision to sell the company to CBS.

Sky News would have produced Ten's evening news, they said, and Fox Sports would have helped produce Ten's sports coverage. The two companies already share the broadcast rights for rugby, supercars and soccer.

Ten and Foxtel use the same company to sell advertising, Multi Channel Network. Given News Corp is likely to see a CBS-owned Ten as a direct competitor, it is unclear if that arrangement will continue.

Taking control of a commercial television network would have locked in a customer for 21st Century Fox, a television and movie company controlled by the Murdoch family, and allowed it share existing costs such as studios, offices and salespeople.

Media-ownership rules don't allow News Corp to own an Australian television network, apart from Foxtel, although Mr Murdoch had worked out a structure using options that would have allowed him to get around the law, which the Coalition government is trying to change, sources said.

News Corp and Fairfax Media, publisher of The Australian Financial Review, have both been campaigning for a change to the law.

Opponents, including the Labor Party and Greens, fear liberalisation would give more power to News Corp, which owns about two-thirds of Australia's newspapers by circulation.

News Corp's publications had a history of giving Ten positive coverage while Mr Murdoch was a shareholder and chairman.

That seemed to change on Monday when The Australian website published an article about the network headlined "Same sex marriage: Network Ten admits doctoring controversial footage".

More:
News Corp doesn't have a second television option - The Australian Financial Review

During catastrophic flooding, press poses Trump hurricane ‘test’ – Fox News

What will it take for Donald Trump to pass the test?

With the president and first lady arriving in Texas today, will the journalists who questioned whether Trump could handle Hurricane Harvey at least give him credit for showing compassion?

He is, at the very least, avoiding the symbolic mistake of George W. Bush in flying over New Orleans after Katrina. (Bush later admitted this was a huge mistake that made him look detached and uncaring.)

While Harveys catastrophic flooding is overwhelming authorities in Houston, Trump hasnt made any significant missteps so far. He held video conferences with senior officials from Camp David--with the White House sending out pictures to create an image of control.

Virtually every mainstream media outlet has been touting the hurricane as the first natural disaster test for Trump, often rooted in an assumption that a guy with no government experience has no idea how to deal with this. And its early in the process. If FEMA screws up, the president will rightly be criticized. But lets not jump the gun.

The real test, in my view, for a president whos been at war with both parties, is for him to pull together a Texas aid package on the Hill, because staggering amounts of money are going to be needed to rebuild these areas in the coming months and years. And in past battles over Katrina and Sandy, some Republicans have argued against federal disaster aid without offsetting spending cuts.

But as the hurricane drama plays out, the media are pursuing a parallel story line about Trump becoming more isolated within his administration.

(Interesting aside: The press is free to cover political controversies as the hurricane damage mounts, but if Trump, amid a series of Harvey messages, tweets about having won Missouri before visiting the state, some critics say aha, he doesnt care!)

Axios reports that the president is getting fed up with Rex Tillerson, a narrative that was fueled when the secretary of State spoke about the American peoples values on Fox News Sunday.

When Chris Wallace said, And the presidents values?, Tillerson replied: The president speaks for himself.

Pundits are coupling this with the fallout from chief economic adviser Gary Cohn speaking out against Trumps handling of Charlottesville.

At the same time, the media are increasingly focused on what the Wall Street Journal editorial page calls Trumps divorce from the GOP Congress. For example, Trump took a Twitter shot at Bob Corker after the Tennessee senator said he hadnt yet demonstrated the stability or competence to be successful.

And Republicans such as Paul Ryan and John McCain are criticizing Trumps during-the-hurricane pardon of former Arizona sheriff Joe Arpaio.

One thing is clear: Trump, as always, puts himself in the eye of the storm. And that may be his real test, long after the Houston floodwaters have receded.

Howard Kurtz is a Fox News analyst and the host of "MediaBuzz" (Sundays 11 a.m.). He is the author of five books and is based in Washington. Follow him at @HowardKurtz. Click here for more information on Howard Kurtz.

Go here to read the rest:
During catastrophic flooding, press poses Trump hurricane 'test' - Fox News

Talib Kweli – She’s My Hero (Prod. By Oh No) – HotNewHipHop

Talib Kweli has always chose the music he made as a platform to introduce his fanbase and further to social issues that many may not be familiar with. After hearing about the case of Bresha Meadows, a 14-year-old girl who shot and killed her abusive father in 2016, Talib began to do more research behind Meadows and her family which ultimately led to the creation of this song "She's My Hero." Kweli uses the song as a reflection of not just Bresha Meadows but ultimately, for children who are living in abusive households.

In the description in the song's Soundcloud page, Kweli writes "What struck me about this case was Breshas age. I express myself lyrically, so a lyric popped in my head while thinking about it - 'Do you kill yourself or kill the monster thats making you suicidal, decisions to heavy for the mind of a child.'"

Over the production of Oh No, breaks down the song in two parts essentially. The first verse gives a pretty detailed depiction of Bresha's scenario where as the second verse addresses the system at large. It's a powerful song that was inspired from his perspective as a father. In the description box of the song he also says "The first thing that struck me about Bresha was how much she physically reminded me of my own daughter. I had a similar experience when George Zimmerman killed 17 year old Trayvon Martin, who reminded me of my son. I instantly felt drawn to these children and I felt compelled to dive deeper into their lives."

Talib Kweli maintains his position as one of the best emcee's alive and his ability to hone other people's perspectives and put it in a verse. "She's My Hero" is a prime example of him using his platform to continuously bring awareness to social issues.

Quotable LyricsThey say karma is a bitchAnd when you take a lifeYou pay the priceWe shootin' in these momentsTo confuse your violence with a way of life

Go here to see the original:
Talib Kweli - She's My Hero (Prod. By Oh No) - HotNewHipHop

A founder of Black Lives Matter answers a question on many minds: Where did it go? – Los Angeles Times

To supporters, it is a respectable civil rights movement. To critics, its an anti-police organization that deserves to be banned.

Black Lives Matter came into existence following the 2012 killing of Trayvon Martin, an African American teen, by neighborhood watch volunteer George Zimmerman in Sanford, Fla. The group became known nationally amid protests in Ferguson, Mo., after a white police officer shot and killed Michael Brown, an 18-year-old black man.

Since then, the organization founded by Alicia Garza, Patrisse Cullors and Opal Tometi has been on the front lines of protests against what it calls the sustained and increasingly visible violence against black communities.

While its prominence appears to have waned in recent months, Cullors, 32, a native of Van Nuys who lives in Los Angeles, insisted that the movement is today more relevant than ever.

It has swelled to 40 chapters, including branches in Canada and Britain. In November, the group will receive the Sydney Peace Prize, Australias leading award for global peacemakers.

Cullors, who is writing a memoir, recently shared reflections on the state of Black Lives Matter and its future. Her comments have been edited for length and clarity.

94402807

I think Black Lives Matter is very relevant today, especially given the rise of white supremacists and white nationalists across, not just this country, but across the globe. And so our work over the last four years has been putting anti-black racism on the map, talking about the impact anti-black racism has on this country, has on local government, has on policy and how it actually impacts the everyday life of black people.

As organizers, we have to think every day are we making an impact. Are we changing the material conditions for black people? I think, yes, we've had an impact. I think part of what we're seeing in the rise of white nationalism is their response to Black Lives Matter, is their response to an ever-increasing fight for equal rights, for civil rights and for human rights.

I would actually challenge the media, because the media has in large part focused primarily on Trump and his administration. And so, as our folks have continued to organize locally, have continued to, not just hit the streets, many of our people are thinking about how to enact a political strategy. How do we build black power in this moment? How do we actually get people in office?

It's not a hashtag that built the movement. It was organizers, activists, educators, artists people who built an actual infrastructure so that a movement can exist and have life. And if the media was interested in the everyday strategy they would know that Black Lives Matter is not just still here, that it's thriving and it's doing some of its best work in this moment.

It's not. And we wouldn't take the invitation.

We wouldn't as a movement take a seat at the table with Trump, because we wouldn't have done that with Hitler. Trump is literally the epitome of evil, all the evils of this country be it racism, capitalism, sexism, homophobia.

94402822

He has set out some of the most dangerous policies, not just that impacts this country but impacts the globe. And so for us, the answer is not to sit with him but to resist him and to resist every single policy that he's implemented that impacts our communities.

And if I'm thinking about what I want my children to know in 30, 40, 50 years, I want them to know that I resisted a president at all costs, because this president literally tried to kill our communities, and is killing our communities.

Some things don't change. I don't want to act like if we have Hillary Clinton in office everything would be different. No.

The first thing that Black Lives Matter had to do was remind people that racism existed in this country because when we had Obama people thought we were post-racial. That was the debate. Is racism over? And very quickly we understood that it was not over. And then the second one was to talk about anti-black racism. And then I think the next step for Black Lives Matter was to decide, What was our target?

And I want to be frank. I think our target has been law enforcement, and that has been important because black folks not only are killed with impunity, but also black folks are some of the most marginalized and vulnerable communities in this country. We believe if we can actually get real accountability in this country around mass criminalization, we could start to change the other apparatuses inside this country.

I want to see Black Lives Matter be able to ultimately reduce law enforcement funding.

People often ask the question, why reduce their funding? Because they're the one industry in our nation, and locally in particular, that is given more money than education or access to education, resources to shelter, resources to people to have access to healthy food. Over the last 30, 40 years what we've seen is the pouring of millions of dollars into law enforcement and literally divesting from communities, especially poor communities. And so our argument is ... they can start divesting from law enforcement and reinvesting into our communities.

I always want to ask who is taking the poll? Which Americans are they talking about? Are they talking about white Americans or talking about black Americans? Are they talking about people who are new to this country?

But the second thing I'll say is [civil rights leader Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.] had some of the lowest acceptance rates during his time him and the civil rights movement. And look at us now. Look at how important of a figure he was.

I believe in direct action, but nonviolent direct action. And our movement believes in that nonviolent direct action. But I do believe that our communities need to be defended.

What happened in Charlottesville shouldnt have happened. Many folks that were on the ground said the police were not helpful at all. And yet when Black Lives Matter hits the streets, when we are nonviolent, were the first ones to be snatched up by police. Were the first ones to be beaten by police. So while I think our movement should stick to nonviolent direct action, I do think the government should do a better job at defending us and defending protesters in particular.

94402844

One of the biggest places that I see us will be in local and national government. I think youll see, not just black people, but black folks and our allies really pushing to be a part of local government, city government and national government to move to be mayor, county board of supervisors, to be on boards.

People have asked me to really think about taking elected office. At this moment, I feel Im more effective on the ground. Im not interested in elected office at this moment. But who knows?

ann.simmons@latimes.com

@amsimmons1

jaweed.kaleem@latimes.com

@jaweedkaleem

Originally posted here:
A founder of Black Lives Matter answers a question on many minds: Where did it go? - Los Angeles Times