Archive for August, 2017

LETTER TO THE EDITOR: A Republic, not a democracy! – Crestview News Bulletin

Remember the reply Benjamin Franklin gave when asked what type of government the Constitutional Convention of 1787 had created. He stated, A republic, if you can keep it.

Many Americans believe that we live in a democracy. This claim is almost universally accepted in the news media, but is it true?

If the United States of America is a democracy, then why, in the Pledge of Allegiance that used to be universally recited by schoolchildren every morning, is reference made to the republic (not democracy) for which it (the flag) stands? Why is the famous war hymn not titled The Battle Hymn of the Democracy?

In The Federalist, No. 10, James Madison clearly spells out the difference between democracies and republics. A pure democracy he defined as a society consisting of a small number of citizens, who assemble and administer the government in person, while a republic is a government in which the scheme of representation takes place. Based on the example of the ancient Greek city-states, Madison opined that democracies are inherently unstable and short-lived, spectacles of turbulence and contention that were actually injurious to liberty; as in the French Revolution (1789-1799).

Democracy in theory was more beloved of egalitarians (later named socialists) than of true partisans of liberty. In republics, the instability occasioned by direct self-government is tempered by the scheme of representation. Delegation of government duties to elected officials, stated Madison, would refine and enlarge the public views, by passing them through the medium of a chosen body of citizens, whose wisdom may best discern the true interest of their country, and whose patriotism and love of justice will be least likely to sacrifice it to temporary or partial considerations. Put otherwise, republics, by ensuring that decisions are made by bodies of elected or appointed magistrates, are far less likely to act precipitously and unwisely, especially in times of crisis or public agitation. This is because duly-appointed government bodies have the ability to deliberate, which the general public does not.

Thus, while our electoral system is partly democratic, and other features of direct democracy, such as town hall meetings and referenda, are found here and there, the United States was created to be, and remains (at least in intent), a republic a government of laws, and not of men.

Remember the reply Benjamin Franklin gave when asked what type of government the Constitutional Convention of 1787 had created. He stated, A republic, if you can keep it.

Let us strive to keep it.

Steve Czonstka, Okaloosa Republican State Committeeman, Niceville

Link:
LETTER TO THE EDITOR: A Republic, not a democracy! - Crestview News Bulletin

The American Left’s Infatuation With Communism – Patriot Post

Arnold Ahlert Aug. 17, 2017

This year marks the 100th anniversary of the two revolutions that swept through Russia, ending the reign of the czarists and enabling the rise of radical Bolsheviks led by Vladimir Lenin. Since then communist ideology has precipitated the deaths of more than 100 million people and counting.

The riot in Charlottesville last Saturday is a stark reminder of the American Lefts dubious double standard with regard to virulent ideologies. While leftists are correctly contemptuous of the Nazism that forms the foundation of white supremacist hate groups, they retain a soft spot in their hearts for Communism.

And yet both ideologies are flip sides of the same totalitarian coin.

For most leftists, and many other Americans, Hitlers Third Reich remains the ultimate expression of racist, murderous hate. Yet among the 20th centurys worst mass murderers, Adolf Hitler comes in third by a wide margin. By most historical estimates, Hitler murdered six million Jews and an additional five million others, bringing his total to 11 million.

Josef Stalins total is conventionally put at 20 million killed, with some historians contending it may be twice that number.

Both men pale in comparison to Mao Zedung. Chairman Mao bears responsibility for 40 to 77 million killed, with the discrepancy owing to an ongoing historical argument over whether the mass starvation of millions in Chinas great famine (1958-1961) was intentional or not. Most historians lean toward the higher number.

Mao and Stalin were Communisms superstars, but there were other mass murderers like Pol Pot and the Khmer Rouge, who ruled Cambodia from 1975-1979 and killed up to two million people. Their ascendance was part of the Communist takeover of the Southeast Asian Peninsula following Americas withdrawal from Vietnam, whose own fall to Communism was aided and abetted by a Democrat-controlled Congress that cut funding to South Vietnams government from $700 million in 1974 to only $300 million the following year. This enabled Hanois Communist takeover and additional mass murders.

So why is Hitler, as opposed to Mao or Stalin, the embodiment of evil? Because the American Left has never completely rejected its belief in the philosophy of Communism and its radical egalitarian, collectivist worldview. Leftists only wish to paint the American Right as racist, and thus use Nazis as a bludgeon.

Moreover, a certain level of nostalgia remains the order of the day. In a series of articles called Red Century, The New York Times explored an ideology it alternately acknowledged as horrific yet morally complex.

Morally bankrupt is more like it, despite Times columnist and Democratic Socialists of America vice chairman Bhaskar Sunkaras pathetic attempt to separate the message from the messengers. We may reject the version of Lenin and the Bolsheviks as crazed demons and choose to see them as well-intentioned people trying to build a better world out of a crisis, but we must work out how to avoid their failures, he insists.

Such contemptible nonsense courtesy of the Times is nothing new. Reporter Walter Duranty won a Pulitzer Prize for singing Stalins praises during a Ukrainian famine that killed 10 million in 1932. Yet as Sunkara indicates, Durantys apologist take you cant make an omelet without breaking a few eggs remains ideologically operational.

It also remains literally operational in Venezuela, whose implosion reveals the rank ignorance of leftist useful idiots like Jesse Jackson, Sean Penn, Michael Moore, Danny Glover, Oliver Stone and others who hailed the 21st century Socialism that is devolving into totalitarian tyranny.

The same totalitarian tyranny entrenched in North Korea.

To communist sympathizers and adherents, none of it matters. Nor does it matter that Communisms founders, Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, were avowed racists and anti-Semites. Both expressed contempt for Mexicans, politicians with nger-like features, a quality Engels referred to as a degree nearer to the rest of the animal kingdom than the rest of us, and the huckstering Marx referred to as the worldly religion of the Jew.

The progressive blind spot to communism reflects historical ignorance on the part of Americans and Europeans, columnist Michael Rubin asserts.

In America, it is cultivated ignorance. Thus 40% of Millennials believe its acceptable to suppress offensive speech about minorities, while minorities and their equally clueless allies countenance elimination of history itself, emulating the Islamic State, as well as the Nazis who destroyed any piece of art Hitler found offensive.

And on Americas college campuses, where leftists routinely shut down speech they define as hate employing violence if necessary to do so they are emulating Communist Chinas Red Guard movement that precipitated attacks on those whose traditional views were insufficiently revolutionary.

The Lefts cultivation of communist ideas has occurred for decades. In 1993, Library of Congress experts traveled to Moscow to copy previously secret records of Communist Party USA activities that had been sent to the Soviet Union for safekeeping. They reveal irrefutable evidence of cooperation between the Soviets and American leftists from the 20s through the '40s. Coded Soviet intercepts known as the Venona Papers confirmed that infiltration, vindicating much of what Sen. Joseph McCarthy asserted during the '50s, despite his continuing status as the Lefts most enduring icon of evil.

In the '60s, the college students who recoiled in the presence of a swastika did so while wearing Che Guevara T-shirts and singing the praises of Communist Party U.S.A. radicals like Angela Davis. It was also a time when future failed Democrat presidential candidate Hillary Clinton was learning and teaching the revolutionary tactics of communist sympathizer Saul Alinsky tactics Barack Obama perfected in winning the presidency.

In the '70s and '80s, Democrats pursued their admiration of the Soviet Union with vigor, making peace trips to the USSR, often as members of communist-created front groups. And when Ronald Reagan called the Soviets the evil empire they actually were, Democrats painted him as a warmonger who would lead the nation to nuclear holocaust. Moreover, the party that currently excoriates Donald Trump for his Russian connections apparently had no problem when Ted Kennedy offered to help the Soviets thwart Reagans re-election.

Most recently, the Obama administration had at least two communist sympathizers working for it: former White House Communication Director Anita Dunn, who professed admiration for Mao Zedung, and former CIA Director John Brennan, who voted for Communist Party candidate Gus Hall in 1980. As for Obama himself, a video from 1995 shows him stating he was taught about race relations by Communist Party member Frank Marshall Davis.

Until the left, and all the institutions influenced by the left, acknowledge how evil communism has been, we will continue to live in a morally confused world, argues Dennis Prager.

Of course, as Prager knows full well, the American Left embraces Communism. Moreover, moral confusion is a necessary component of leftist power. When right and wrong are relative, by any means necessary becomes a reasonable substitute. Exhibit A is a despicable Washington Post op-ed by Johns Hopkins University associate professor N.D.B. Connolly, who insists leftist generic solutions to racism, etc. arent working.

What to do instead? Start throwing rocks, he advises.

Thus, 100 years and 100 million deaths later, the American Lefts infatuation with Communism remains undimmed. And as decent Americans recoil in disgust, the historical purges remain ongoing, begging the inevitable question:

When do the book burnings begin?

Go here to read the rest:
The American Left's Infatuation With Communism - Patriot Post

Catholic Church in Russia recalls victims of Communism – Catholic Culture

Catholic World News

August 17, 2017

The secretary-general of the Russian Catholic bishops conference has asked Christians in the West to help keep alive the memory of Russian Christians who died under Communist persecution.

The sufferings in Soviet prisons and labor camps remain an issue for the whole of society in Russia, said Msgr. Igor Kovalevsky. Churches have been built to those who died for the faith, who deserve to be compared to the martyrs of Christianitys first centuries.

Msgr. Kovalevsky reported that during the Great Purge of the Stalin era, 442 Catholic priests and more than 100,000 Orthodox priests were killed. Of more than 1,000 Catholic churches and chapels, all but two were destroyed or converted for secular use.

References:

Sound Off! CatholicCulture.org supporters weigh in.

All comments are moderated. To lighten our editing burden, only current donors are allowed to Sound Off. If you are a donor, log in to see the comment form; otherwise please support our work, and Sound Off!

There are no comments yet for this item.

See the article here:
Catholic Church in Russia recalls victims of Communism - Catholic Culture

Socialism Wreaks Havoc In Venezuela As Country Suffers From Chronic Food Shortage – Swarajya

The country that today holds the largest proven reserves of crude oil, a resource that in the early 1900s became synonymous with wealth, is quickly descending into chaos. A hunger crisis has hit Venezuela, where people are protesting against President Nicols Maduro Moros and demanding his removal from office.

Political crisis, policy paralysis and crashing oil prices have left the countrys socialist government with little foreign currency to buy goods from other countries. Imports are down 50 per cent from a year ago, pushing the country deeper into a hunger crisis.

Various news reports in the last week have brought to light the chronic food shortage in the country. According to Miami Herald, Venezuelan soldiers in uniform were caught begging for food in neighbouring Guyana last week. That soldiers would cross into Guyana is telling because reports in the last few months have suggested that the military, which has largely remained loyal to the unpopular government, has been in control of food resources to a large extent and has been trafficking it.

Thieves in Venezuela are stealing animals from a zoo to eat and sell them, The Guardian has reported. According to the World Health Organization, hospitals there lack 95 per cent of necessary medicines. At least 75 per cent of the population has lost an average of at least 19 pounds in 2016 due to a lack of proper nutrition amid the ongoing crisis.

According to the International Monetary Fund, inflation is expected to rise 720 per cent this year and over 2,000 per cent the next year. In response to high inflation, Venezuela's socialist government has raised the minimum wage by 60 per cent to 200,021 bolivares ($45 on the unofficial but often-used exchange rate as calculated by dolartoday.com) a month, including food stamps.

Food prices in the markets around the country have skyrocketed. In March, a basket of basic grocery items which includes eggs, milk and fruits cost 772,614 bolivares, close to four times the monthly minimum wage, according to the Venezuela-based Center of Social Analysis and Documentation.

Visit link:
Socialism Wreaks Havoc In Venezuela As Country Suffers From Chronic Food Shortage - Swarajya

The alt-right is not truly right – Washington Examiner

The term "alt-right" was coined in 2010 by socialist and white supremacist Richard Spencer and has never been an entity within the Republican Party or conservative movement. The term specifically refers to an "alternative right" in which the Republican Party is to be invaded in an attempt to use it for the advancement of socialist ideals.

However, Spencer's plan to alter the conservative movement has not worked well for him, as true conservatives have undoubtedly and expectedly refused to welcome Spencer into our circles. True conservatives do not respect Spencer, and he has never respected conservatives either, oftentimes referring to us as "cucks" and "the fake right."

Time and time again, Spencer proudly admits to wanting to "co-opt" the Right in order to achieve his own personal goal of replacing conservative values with policies he finds more ideal.

Spencer's ideal vision is to see the Republican Party riddled with socialism. As a national-socialist himself, the alt-right leader's two biggest problems with the Republican Party is our championing of individuality and free markets. Spencer would rather see conservatives engage in similar practices of the Left, such as focusing predominantly on collectivism and grouping people based on identity, such as skin color.

Spencer also advocates for a single-payer, universal healthcare system, believing that the United States could benefit from imitating "democratic socialist countries" in Europe.

Spencer has previously said, "I am not totally opposed to socialism, when done right I think we should have a national healthcare system."

Spencer criticizes free markets, agreeing with Karl Marx's statement that capitalism, not communism, is to blame for an "undifferentiated, alienated proletarian mass." Spencer stands for everything the liberty movement is against.

Socialism, whether it is adorned with a hammer and sickle or a swastika, is responsible for killing millions of people throughout history. It is fundamentally anti-American, and no political party in the country should ever invite it into their worlds.

Despite having horrible views on politics and ethics, Spencer does know what he's doing. The current political climate makes right now more than ever the best opportunity for Spencer to gain popularity by fueling his own publicity off the hysteria of the Left.

The hysterical Left make themselves vulnerable by jumping at every opportunity they can to label even the most mundane and non-radical ideas "fascism." By this premise, Spencer knows that when a real white supremacist becomes vocal, such as himself, that he will find himself effortlessly basking in massive amounts of free publicity given to him by the Left.

Leftists are making Spencer relevant in a society that at its core has no interest in anything the man has to say.

No decent person wants someone with radically fringe positions to have influence in our society, not even in the slightest. Therefore, the Left should join conservatives in ignoring Richard Spencer and this ridiculous "alt-right" movement, because it is impossible to be heard when nobody is listening to you.

Alana Mastrangelo is a political activist and writer.

If you would like to write an op-ed for the Washington Examiner, please read our guidelines on submissions here.

Continue reading here:
The alt-right is not truly right - Washington Examiner