Archive for August, 2017

NYPD officials booted for being too drunk to fly to Afghanistan for training trip – New York Daily News

Yys30L%Oy$8@$(Ua-@Rq$i`owN? _(dHa O4GFg08vL@d d9>f){ZW161y]hq`NA"?<9pvbAq18F.)Nu+-l7nj| iViZOHn[MsI<6a~U?}084N>H +QtbNtPn9A)>|64m 3Owh4#z Nx^4k:$#8s08h<_ P)xq3w@'p LdH.6d"C[^thNollVV{roV('1SC4CE>/r-up@0+x>I(D1?|*.e@"xpw|H~a:fMlQ)far`6!#_$Q1+,2T$B$2FL5 `WYzi[F,E^_FvI0|2}HvKR4'8B9c7N*U.%1ay}% uJ<{O=5J3Px:'?,OwS]Hsf+J@OK$>!)$O]Wi|oxgwctvnSkk$K/1cF@qGFhn?t(THYXj{k{k])-@6vnrcav1qbvjvc{k+xtr* 4TeHz4y^~O[i^|$UIo<2{y}spslipb;vs}O.V/+h8'UwV8lO:otq.:e>MonO{19}?iLcWwz9/g^WioYteWZ6srK]/Xz PbcNZSkcFA']ue#JlCrQ=s0w|1XAb"ZOhS+Y]s#= {? ,+8+v~+w?B aq$0q}BK'(]pHn9 Iz9]j =WOj"[(~J MG%}v}$ 0RL3(rQSw/"*EKW@"[4rN&N];036,iXf,#rE~s']K({!TW F02N#>Lkl>'~H*Xxv9HdP0UyTXrZ9oW/*T5iO{+vhpdCR}-{y$'R(! l-3}-'Xx$PemLk`+{ bt(B5=K {ZSy7)F)DH6R H t2!qN8*y( `tNYnrk! Rr.J= g)1d2D/MaF,#l:a1 9Z!I; />d}!q)Y!^4Wd?~ Lj9vh(AThB7+ 'a!d`M{TYrH|z{b6BBlo,@,';zaeSyd?_4]qZ~SF;IPL1E=bw>uv~U}}/2Zpco}yJ}e[?V? I4 [s$9Y1XdH'pR5=Z{nmWM}@[y ;G'i^}HkEg/H5aV*m7aEg/S#Fe3U373V+'6Zf5Z#~d(QQ&H:Rw;1]G3%XPN(' 7nWxjem, PuA8@8{C#>=K;=XZ()x.?|k!Wbd(pnw]Prw8lJWqA`3)g6{^n?h}z3CGWCxty<[)Nw2|Zv'`YK y99Blhrp< ej e*^81)Pp`G'=Q9951Imf1Hjg.$l&MSeGC uy/qr2Fzpp'#GT=z@fkIE9p/'sq u0|=5ifb{x)|/{#b'3S_kzo2 .1|PwW)CS)2X;7V#g]V9&EfNfaBS^&]#+59E/ V'$7e.U=kU93rg5 v5z/m 9^}=fH 28Rjm%uY346_>vL=6zM#Vm V|+RQ+M,+Srpu8yI}^O$}554Q6aC~#Nums2o'(}Mfq7@*cu.~|d= E@aiEBco+pfg3[$OSGuSC11?m`T@R;An=s;~E3@R?);Fs645 8l^ l^uR'4|{xs[}fk~U/ (`s"7,y$Pz~TZ&|ifH7Zxu|Rl uDk]w#tQk?|9 M24ltqY7_7{-[_;VlWuv] Y+vU{;?7?O/[?j}?N;+IniLiMo~sxX6S7jFb#paehi{c|&W ~[~PZ?_0VjMvbMx.HXr=%UK^!C;!MxRyrj-C[&mHXS_J4,#VxX5}S"j9)h,kX$|',+*-ph},; 9lG3rA0*%Jl{i}^_F+'a? kx9-g{Y%;BpY2}QT'"em2tbm:C%"~>'RoD>Fyw`cm,[2j}-BHnLwuD+Y8W%Zlmjhr-TVb9/Ciga O41:B <6=^NBGY[Aan7VTQ'n3' Z+W^f}KR uZ)p3TDWJI:%kOTX, aR'EY`MYSnwk!4 {>rzJ'Kq[le%XW.Y~[=Y8f9>yl&YmnO"'t^5Jy=?t\VqS;Er+P&ZEEs{EgvpV8'i8/.8 QY<)K}mcw2w-{'% <#2g^@^9g9E&:,4?cVTz~SghBUF,?:D{5}/uH|du$Fl9 "X7Fs^REgC`i3 1fKL:*[)|C[?pJs$)P].#oB`v 3/Y&-3fMNhb5yavLBbrz|v7'p<"N`.?pgq23S:x|1,m'1/+bwxV!N4gu 5Hd`!O tkgAY#frq&I-HNk%&j2{h7h*NqY [i?sZe#`M=zP.@LT`w9*oVY7p+`2gtVo=Dm+EQW~l=%dN!;Wq3_bSAqVo;/}TOC?u:_1gt;l2FzE}~?d-VM3G<=pEZ>lymXk+s8=gA=~#"^T7hb0G'&k7[{u|cM^?e~JL&5KUSwzG9wq|Dp9Kqsz1vX8nJMrG={bl'~E2UK|A){gmG9PJ/B6?M p <`uypttgzg}|R?K=%vFF9Pr`|G'(EFx'l-G?+uyB^ .q$Cyg%RlCKqBvre3iG+93rY8yB6kUz<38"GX.]kNVL^L(f~)8 ~Zu2seMrb|P4Y g}j;j[>g8q3<{of/C?s+W ~s}8+AVYO0fSNLU]`vsv{S@T+'w!/27;b{!A{mCLDO+l|tf0bqEYpYG'7V&d"g,N7&393upEw5:~PnW6G {IB?d2z%!Bg+X5a&9?x]Cuaz]WQ.OT?PxJ#l`95~|`e{r9oj7}NzPc4H V-H6MeW Yzfo#tkz.lG.Y(2%Y{rCME^Ro6L)|nR"|&e.(bj8NY^+x|9^jo7C< 84tmuQ7VlpSoU3gDTxHPPO/n]Q)wa4(R~k"h>5+U6`d~9?s, F8XoU;Kk9I{Gu-HsLOy /L[o:Z%`f[<.V^>5=~zHJiK&V0 (f;~wR{"_9q#sN#D=_}lotnCYo][U%czf))T'RA,/-&?~gAuCR9'vZY9 X[s8~^tM9hBMR%@l d.=5}d;qd:LKwEw86ay0gAh0wnNa;4RxRY&]Gu[!fCx|2m||zk[F.;xpj{Ss6s;S3|t]_}&i5tx>'7I-[];lf=Zjv] kg5pcanp0Z9=&`,?*RhO1qM_gQ_78+T19RmAY %~"r(}*/wvzX:E]6n=k5Vsq^8k;6j#QKte]]H7co)wA}-SQk|o%n0&]5 bei| ,+ 1zkO'97_|ZI!.!NW ?RIcKz9.!|>Sj:E|Kqi)clVNqUaXuyv8^HWlsJ[>C^= 7B|iQ~nfusnMp99KQNM<3D^(Lx|:tE(m,,hEz6TW-z5DD]Y(o( KWz S"FQ]&OZ`Aj>;Kt-}z $`$rTc4Ec(o=`O 3'i,$hg^Hf Q=)WA_/P|@~,5<=L;~iIvdsYc-#d;Ru6c #O-P?ATraa eC_) Sg>(>"iM)tgNVBsZCi8 K9*(> $L> 1!JJ+>|p$NC W*.dcA9!R@xy8dc]yN&r0Z'?Kz4m|RS8tt4t#Gs7_.}PpPO9,T>^?s6cEy tA>E|dldz-v=0kR3bhnz3r}{dT'T_) 4wz1>-9 TVy#"oQ"97W2vogwoV6;0I &'zI4+ T0 ti<{|hEk*Os:nlMrowP@<'g'+^r&fh7 KEN)B>AkQNd]MM*iz jF"PN[yI:h] a>| nz^LAEjw8@re6!10dXxOLZ7nNzj3xjj7Yo}N-Y"i&]cMK"?DKZ'q/}~E} 8wOVe[Q[pQKS<8cR)Ek{Q.pxT,U`k,2*IHaK*g;'(D]eZx6"Eg4 Zn,6]bX_xYl`1t|xh`2pK:_4NAkBz9Yt3p dMTMBZM#U/IRk ' *R)#hqf| e(DCa4VP3[U*Y}>xfyf"SR4.Dr^J~PB~iC3A{`6(e$98R:/> IWdAtN}Csc '1XOC< ?MOLyt#u,'BVFiU ^aV4*NlzD1!"1pR1I+I Z [at["=;_wbffXKdm`/#h9Nogo4y7@C{vn=v Cgn-$. hNnw}SnEX7BCf4Hy`:pra|r>j1hu1uVJhp w= |D$[wG+xJCDA 8OYVfvrJX@"qqtCA

O/lto{) 9x#nR]i]uQW|;@_;d:/#wPcU.5BcvK`Wq%eG`>J=b[$j:N*32e7Wn2pg`Yn,R6%E~aCGC~Bx`X) 3Pa!.uS}W]`/ *GX+b'S_:;d34%MEOYnF}n],ne-nk 919O,s=wHJcuG"9s=J}g* }tJf>W#g^R&bc oU7i&r^hKK~LpJeBsk VY*TK0K V;Pb+}N0T|Igr` e2DzRNk8 XbtcB,yJvr!l1m2n7ATZqV$Zc+Hb 9gw8^^3yE02hM+Mbu(*I8$SrimZ7QHGong?XJPE!m!- #lf*Ix%pIQ|OY*66?L"AY ttb r4IgF"iywS3+#!A^2W AK3tMp,qglU].bN4N>/Dt+5f'Jkx6gOhOh0& /*&39I0 1Rfe#=&&`F# +qc>UZ-)i IkH17$0Pq:^@){flRia|F(>%,)prb8SLBP9@#43cyXxI)M8(.0v*-2y*6/34_W`xBbyj5`snA)C?HSmoCr`v$ZQo2]%NL;)Ef 3T(}sto:B%J(w*eNRAc_UlC$.06MjmF^Pc. #d/P zm=;JP ripwzc_TgXiZ?d/UQ70L_DEAp`Q{fY{QgZk~C> _0 wC{uoT.-pvAi/ry"{/xK5w.?z]_VEt=Yp*rj2S4SPV`lkcUEvbW&z8HI/|yeS}c7cJN be}cwqkpxBm%xs}4//`c/OC@dglP#Mrl&u}5pBvr(do9,]FOw%6pGI_`Y9G]m9Ya 56z[nzYh*ut}79=EM;qYQgy}u4n~n^O/C9,tEr{6CZ&j0`O&mUmNuS,O&fpy%0P]qOV$VA(cEv+{sZyp.K$1!_gyLl_E^~G3pP9z+5:}b%cy^Ssv8=px2W[c:IUW:?39S.D i@'QoZ/'gcg?T+F<^s%loZTGdy2~|H^V/5cW8w/%euxm x^onD9pyxM0r-C<1"$uwGpOlXxmqM;<>i-[6sg/o#7%=3[K`4pjJ^d9iD3W-"V|q2>s$Lm&w2o:<8Q4:Mr28))LYr'm h5^I0k:>Ona>OGoO>.7)-U{#EO2 LOC1=wN9Nj_^095ImsOD

w?}asjn`$q&7zMDj2hd!t,h}n n9`V5Wvtx5oC1 pa)FcUIlY7.50' s58sn+C-K$s/Lj%-A sstfsSzTOZXO~C$em+c(HwhX{I)6QAqg9m,VfC2b/2pLk2riA~/^}mmnc]M7KG5O'3m4f6xOUi*Y0XXtZ/S?YJc_Ej._n@c/ku1hQ]_;a[b{OE!==f*w(Z,LoBqCg>PKUqy^jIu+a^w=#w 6ZfXs>px0y>tQl&h~rmwF}T+Xg35u.=+tzL }~~O5 z]Lx=: ,T"q|9kSzw@!pk?D;g3GNS^0NeC~II%IutfA=rox' 8yC&1h<^JTm4}vVEfNTn{tl~;x9QojSTH{_@cU z| sjnYe/72oL~1>.iA,-N-<|Ev9K{lHl5#LM(IGaJk/EDmG*r_ZWz]o&; yrLo4_hcU?H}FbV!<}FV#7b;q/aA}{q)^iJUU2jf-hCof)#+vk?K$}~eXIwp-8<4b~BCS~wu{u}bd`:x8BFr{"~D"Wl W/)OeexL1PpqN }xs@'.S_w9Y}&[=`cv,[_;wb5y@"=7o ?&-3'aN;s>r?kG pL?C]/NN.o1LpNXKZ=RmG;}'5!-3xmE1{ B2kKa6'SfcMks1' j>1Tu:qkg?/8[Nz<^ >~EGMC+q[#, e#Q;{m";G}x:[]1e'b"SLpA6/rwEK]q[p/.3/{TG"4LHw#T N_,m5Oq7J58j!."T|wob].U M9yGlU&

Continued here:
NYPD officials booted for being too drunk to fly to Afghanistan for training trip - New York Daily News

‘Guardian angel’ need for advisers in Afghanistan drives call for more troops – Reuters

KABUL (Reuters) - Navigating a chaotic maze of cars and people, the convoy of British army armored vehicles weaves slowly through Kabul. The job of about a dozen soldiers is to protect just two international advisers on their way to meet Afghan soldiers.

While every mission varies, for every adviser deployed in Afghanistan as part of a NATO-led multinational force, many more soldiers are tasked with providing security and support.

The minimum security requirements mean that providing even just a few thousand advisers for Afghan security forces is a monumental task that, if continued, will keep many thousands more international troops and contractors facing daily threats.

That calculus will factor into arguments put before U.S. President Donald Trump on Friday as he and advisers meet ahead of a long-awaited decision on strategy and troop levels for the United States' longest war.

Fewer than 25 percent of coalition troops in Afghanistan are dedicated advisers - with the rest either in a security, support or a combined role.

The need to balance the force with more advisers is a driving factor behind the military's request for more troops, which has met with scepticism in Washington, where Trump was elected on a platform of reducing American commitments overseas.

Providing security and support for the advising mission can be a deceptively dangerous job, with hours of quiet routine that can be broken by deadly violence at any moment.

On Aug. 2, two American soldiers were killed by a suicide car bomb as they were providing security for a convoy in the southern province of Kandahar.

The next day, a Georgian soldier was killed when a coalition convoy was attacked by a suicide bomber in Kabul.

And just two days after that, Romanian soldiers providing security for advisers in Kandahar were forced to shoot and kill an Afghan policeman who attacked the international troops.

For the soldiers of the British army's Royal Irish Regiment in Kabul, this "taxi and bodyguard service" is a far cry from their last deployment to Afghanistan when they battled militants in Helmand province in 2011.

"We're there in the background if anything happens," said ranger Riley Tolliday, describing his job as a "guardian angel" escorting advisers to meetings around the Afghan capital.

After months of relative calm, since April the Royal Irish Regiment has deployed a "quick reaction force" to at least three attacks in the city, said Major Paul Martin, a company commander.

In April, the regiment's soldiers were deployed to mediate a dispute that arose after a vehicle carrying foreign troops was involved in a traffic accident and was fired upon by Afghan police.

In early May, the soldiers escorted the disabled vehicles of an U.S. military convoy that had been struck by a suicide bomber, killing eight Afghan bystanders and wounding three Americans.

And on May 31, they responded to the scene of a massive truck bomb that detonated in the center of Kabul, killing at least 92 people.

The British soldiers helped secure the scene and then evacuated casualties from the German embassy, which was heavily damaged.

Even at the height of the international military mission in Afghanistan, a large proportion of troops was involved behind the scenes providing security and other support for the main mission.

Of the 12,447 troops from 39 countries that make up the NATO-led Resolute Support mission, about 2,865 are classified as advisers, according to numbers provided by the coalition.

Another 7,766 are considered "enablers", which can range from logistics and security troops to fighter aircraft pilots.

And, finally, 1,816 are deployed as "command and control".

Among the enablers plus command-and-control troops, many also have part-time roles advising Afghan counterparts, but the numbers reveal the massive number of supporting troops needed to field even a limited advising mission.

Among the 23,500 private contractors also employed by the U.S. military in Afghanistan, only 800 are classified as trainers, according to the Pentagon.

Erik Prince, the high-profile founder of the private security firm Blackwater, has proposed using contractors to take over all of the foreign mission in Afghanistan.

While the U.S. military has used contractors to buttress the force in Afghanistan, including using private guards for security around some bases, officials say they hope to reduce overall reliance on contractors by deploying more troops.

The command in Kabul is now waiting on the stalled request for thousands more American troops, which they hope will allow them to deploy more soldiers dedicated to working with the Afghans, but also a "significant" number to provide more security, said one senior military official.

Security services have seen a recent increase in demand as advisers try to reach more Afghan units, Martin said.

"We're able to fulfill about 80 percent of the requests we receive."

The troops tasked with escorting the advisers on their missions have to not only provide protection from potential militants, but also from so-called insider attacks by members of the Afghan security forces, who have occasionally turned on their foreign allies.

Originally posted here:
'Guardian angel' need for advisers in Afghanistan drives call for more troops - Reuters

Pakistan’s Khan Calls for ‘Open Borders’ With Afghanistan – Voice of America

ISLAMABAD

Pakistans populist opposition leader, Imran Khan, says the future of long-term relations with landlocked Afghanistan lies in the two countries having open borders and free trade.

Pakistan is unilaterally fencing the nearly 2,600-kilometer, largely porous Afghan border. Authorities defend the recently initiated project, saying it will help stop criminal and terrorist infiltration, as well as boost counterterrorism efforts on both sides.

The Afghan government opposes the border fortification plan because Kabul traditionally has disputed the demarcation drawn during the former British rule of the Indian subcontinent.

Islamabad dismisses the objections and maintains it inherited the boundary as an international frontier.

The long term relationship between Pakistan and Afghanistan is open borders. Rather than building fences, I think it should have open, free trade, it should be like a European Union type of relationship. Thats our long term future and this would be of enormous benefit to Afghanistan and Pakistan, Khan told VOA in a recent interview at Khan's residence and party office in Bani Gala on the outskirts of Islamabad.

Afghanistan relies on Pakistani seaports and land routes for its international trade. Rising diplomatic and political tensions, however, have led to a reduction in the trade and transit activity through Pakistan, according to businessmen on both sides.

Bilateral ties have deteriorated, particularly over the past few years because of a spike in Taliban attacks and territorial advances in Afghanistan.

Afghan officials allege that insurgents use sanctuaries on Pakistani soil to plot deadly attacks in Afghanistan, and the neighboring countrys spy agency is helping them expand their influence in the war-ravaged country.

Islamabad denies the charges and accuses the Afghan intelligence agency of sheltering and helping anti-Pakistan militants to orchestrate terrorist attacks in the country.

The worst of times

Cricket-star-turned-politician Khan, who also is popular among cricket-playing Afghan youth, acknowledges it is the worst of times in terms of relations between Pakistan and Afghanistan.

The problem is right now there is a lot of suspicion in Afghanistan about Pakistan, the way our foreign policy has gone up and down. And in Pakistan right now there is a lot of suspicion about Afghanistan, that the attacks in Pakistan, the terrorist attacks, are coming from Afghanistan, instigated by India, said Khan.

He echoed Pakistan's official stance that archival India is using its growing influence, particularly among Afghan security institutions, to allegedly destabilize Pakistan. Kabul and New Delhi both deny the charges.

Khan urged that the United States should desist from intensifying military actions in Afghanistan, underscoring the need to find a political settlement to the protracted Afghan conflict.

I think the best decision Donald Trump could make is to finally decide to take American troops out of Afghanistan, and then that will pave the way for some sort of consensus government in Afghanistan, Khan said.

President Donald Trumps administration has said it is close to finalizing its Afghan policy, which could see an additional several thousand U.S. troops being deployed to Afghanistan to help local security forces break the military stalemate with the Taliban.

As long as the troops are there, they are not going to be able to enforce peace there. If 150,000 NATO troops could not change Afghanistan, then 5,000 or 10,000 troops are only going to prolong the agony," he added.

Khans party rules Pakistans northwestern Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province, which shares a border with Afghanistan. The province has borne the brunt of terrorist attacks since Islamabad joined hands 16 years ago with Washingtons anti-terrorism operations in Afghanistan.

The violence has significantly declined, however, due to counterterrorism operations in adjoining border areas and major police reforms the provincial government has introduced over the past four years.

The opposition politician and his party, Pakistan Terheek-e-Insaf, are being credited with leading a consistent anti-corruption campaign that ultimately prompted the countrys Supreme Court to investigate and oust former prime minister Nawaz Sharif from office last month for concealing overseas assets.

Observers say Khans successful legal battle has boosted his partys political standing, and it could pose a serious challenge to Sharifs ruling Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz party in 2018 parliamentary elections.

Read more from the original source:
Pakistan's Khan Calls for 'Open Borders' With Afghanistan - Voice of America

A US service member is killed, others wounded, fighting ISIS in Afghanistan – Washington Post

An American service member was killed Wednesday and an unspecific number wounded while battlingIslamic Stateloyalists in eastern Afghanistan.

Members of the Afghan army also sustainedcasualties in what the U.S. military characterized as a partnered operation.

Officials in Kabul have said little else aboutthe engagement, releasing only a brief statementindicating that the wounded were evacuated for medical treatment, the families of those involved were being notified, and the mission was said to be aimed at further reducing theIslamic States regional presence.

The statement doesnot specifywhere the attack occurred, althoughISIS militants are known to be active along the Pakistan border in Nangahar and Kunar provinces.

[Blackwaters founder wants Trump to outsource the Afghanistan war. Why thats so risky.]

Wednesdays fatalityisthe 11th suffered by U.S. forces in Afghanistan this year, surpassinglast years total of 10. All but one resulted from hostile enemy action, according to Defense Departmentdata. It comes, too, as the United States longest war nears the start of its 17th year, and the Trump administration remains without a clear strategy.

The ISIS affiliate in Afghanistan, a group known as ISIS Khorasan, or ISIS-K, is entrenched along the countrys mountainous border with Pakistan. Backed by U.S. troops and firepower, Afghan commando units have aggressively pursued itsfighters for many months and shown some progress in disrupting their activity.

[McCain releases strategy for Afghanistan, preempting and rebuking Trump]

American and Afghan troopslaunched Operation Hamza in early March. The following month, U.S. forces carried out a massive airstrike on an ISIS tunnel complex in Nangarhars Achin district, reportedly killingupward of 100 militants.At the time, U.S. officials estimated that between 400 and 700 ISIS-K militants remained in Afghanistan.

ISIS-K is an offshoot of the terrorist groups core network in Iraq and Syria, receivingtactical guidance and financial support from outside Afghanistan but few additional fighters.

About 14,000 U.S. and NATO troops remain in Afghanistan.With backing from the Pentagon, the wars top commander, Army Gen. John Nicholson, wants to expand his force by about 4,000 American troops, with a match from other NATO countries.

The White House has not committed to that plan. Some advisers havesuggested that contractors could gradually assume the training and advisory mission there, allowing U.S. troops to come home.

In bid to beat back the Taliban, Afghanistan starts expanding its commando units

This is what a day with the Afghan air force looks like

The Islamic State is fighting to the death as civilians flee Raqqa

See the article here:
A US service member is killed, others wounded, fighting ISIS in Afghanistan - Washington Post

Iran Is Not About to Fall for Trump’s Trap – Foreign Policy (blog)

President Donald Trump likes a good war of words with foreign leaders. And besides the North Koreans, the leadership in Iran makes a first-rate target for him. After all, one of his signature campaign pledges was to undo the 2015 nuclear deal that Barack Obamas administration signed with Tehran and five world powers.

Since Trumps earliest days in office, he has kept alive the threat that he might unilaterally withdraw the United States from the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), a multilateral agreement unanimously endorsed by the U.N. Security Council. This represents a challenge to Trumps counterpart in Tehran, President Hassan Rouhani, who made the deal his administrations central accomplishment and is now banking that the U.S. president will stick to it despite Trumps rhetoric.

But Rouhani cant let Trumps threats go unanswered. On Aug. 15, he warned that if Trump imposed new sanctions, Iran could turn the nuclear clock back to where it was prior to the 2015 deal and could do so not within months and weeks, but in a matter of hours and days. In Washington, this was interpreted to mean that Tehran might undo all the concessions it made during the negotiation process and, in a bat of the eye, move back to the edge of a nuclear weapons capability.

Iran has its own merciless politics, and Rouhanis gambit is an effort to prevent Trumps denunciations of the deal from acting as an anchor around his neck. At worst, U.S. opposition to the deal could hinder his domestic agenda and serve as ammunition for members of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) and other hard-liners, who never believed that Washington would keep its end of the bargain. For Rouhani, the nuclear agreement was never an end in itself: Its successful implementation was to be the catapult that would propel him to the highest office in the Islamic Republic. He clearly seems loath to let Trump push him off his path.

No doubt, the recently re-elected Rouhani has greater political ambitions left in him. It is a safe bet to assume he is already eyeing the top job in the regime, the position of supreme leader.

The incumbent, 78-year-old Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, has no plans to go anywhere just yet but Rouhani has to start preparing the ground if he is serious about taking Khameneis post when the current supreme leader dies. In this jockeying for power, and with Trumps threats in the background, Rouhani has no option but to up the rhetorical ante to mollify his right flank. For Rouhani, appearing soft in the face of Trumps warnings is tantamount to political suicide.

Nonetheless, the Iranian presidents statements on the future of the nuclear deal are carefully considered. They in no way indicate that Iran intends to abrogate the nuclear agreement at the first opportunity. In fact, the unanimous view across the Iranian political space is that Trumps aim is to goad Tehran to walk away from the deal on its own.

As Ali Shamkhani, the head of Irans Supreme National Security Council, put it, Trump is laying a trap, and Iran will not fall for it. Elsewhere, in an explicit signal to the Europeans, China, and the Russians,Shamkhanialso said that Iran is not willing to keep JCPOA at any cost, for JCPOA is valid only if all parties continue to respect it.

Iran wants to press the other parties to the nuclear deal to do their utmost to minimize the damage that may arise from American resistance. This is most evident in Tehrans insistence that the major economic powers in Europe and Asia ignore Trumps call to shun the Iranian economy. In other words, Tehran is engaging in its own systematic goading of international public opinion by trying to isolate Trump. As long as all the other signatories to the deal continue to abide by it, the Iranians will have no urge to walk away. Nor does the leadership in Tehran believe that Trump will have the political capital, at home or on the international stage, to mobilize support for renewed sanctions on Iran.

On Aug. 15, Rouhani made another point that did not receive as much attention as his remarks about turning back the nuclear clock. He said criticism inside Iran about the 2015 deal has subsided. He is right, and it is an important point. He is no longer depicted as the father of a deal that was meant to produce sanctions relief but that his hard-line foes said was a pledge that was dead on arrival. With the Iranian presidential elections over, the hard-liners are instead turning their condemnation to Trump for his anti-deal posturing.

What should Washington make of this political convergence in Tehran? Its important not to get too excited: Yes, Rouhani and even his most ardent critics agree that the nuclear deal is both a reality and worth saving. But whether this confluence amounts to a new trajectory in Iranian politics remains to be seen.

Here is what we do know.Rouhanis landslide election victory on May 19 was made possible only because Irans vast reformist-minded voter class opted to come out and cast a vote. The almost 24 million who backed him, many reluctantly, wanted to empower the president to forge ahead with bold policies that pressed for the release of political prisoners and increased representation for women and religious minorities. After all, that is what he promised as the incumbent candidate.

But so far Rouhani has shown no appetite for boldness in his second term. Instead, he appears to be doubling down on his first-term playbook recognizing that change in the Islamic Republic can only be instituted by co-opting the supreme leader and not by attempting to force an agenda on Khamenei.

This is already evident. Just look at the makeup of Rouhanis cabinet nominations, which are up for confirmation this week. Not only did Rouhani reportedly seek Khameneis approval before the list was sent to the parliament for confirmation, an unusual step and one that contravenes the constitution, but his nominees are hardly of the reformist ilk. Mohammad Khatami, the elder of the reformist movement, who had backed Rouhani, was forced to publicly remind the president about his campaign promises.

Meanwhile, in his inauguration speech on Aug. 5, Rouhani avoided any topic that might dismay Khamenei. There was no mention of freeing political prisoners or questioning the vast powers of the IRGC or its military interventions in Syria and Iraq. Rouhani focused on assuring that there are no serious splits inside the regime and dismissed the idea of duality of power in Tehran as merely a myth. Foreign businesses, he said, should feel safe investing in Iran.

The head of the IRGC, Gen. Mohammad Ali Jafari, did not attend the inauguration perhaps a signal that contradicts Rouhanis attempt to prove Iranian politics is in harmony. It isnt, but Rouhani is not the only one who wants to move the political pendulum toward the center.

Khameneis own recent appointments also suggest a desire to strengthen the nucleus of the regime by keeping both reformists and the far-right out of key positions. His appointments this week to the Expediency Council, an organ that mediates between the elected parliament and the unelected Guardian Council, were devoid of both radical reformists and any candidates from the far right.

The fact that Khamenei and Rouhani are acting in concert is not coincidental and should not come as a surprise. Neither man is interested in major disruptions inside the regime.Meanwhile, a feasible strategy for Rouhani, as he looks to make himself into the inevitable choice for the top job when the day arrives, is to broaden his base.

Rouhani successfully cajoled reformist voters to pull the lever for him in the last presidential election but, going forward, this is not the constituency that he needs the most. If he hopes to rise to the Islamic Republics top post, he needs to move toward the political center and even further to the right, where he will find the IRGC and other hard-liners. Rouhanis calculated war of words with Trump has to be seen in this broad context: Iran is unlikely to violate the nuclear deal as long as the EU, Russia, and China stick to it, but threatening to walk away will help the Iranian presidents political strategy at home.

ATTA KENARE/AFP/Getty Images

Twitter Facebook Google + Reddit

Go here to read the rest:
Iran Is Not About to Fall for Trump's Trap - Foreign Policy (blog)