Archive for June, 2017

Liberals Celebrate Parallels Between ‘House of Cards’ and Trump – NewsBusters (blog)


NewsBusters (blog)
Liberals Celebrate Parallels Between 'House of Cards' and Trump
NewsBusters (blog)
Ever since Donald Trump entered the political sphere, liberals have loved comparing him to the sleazy, power-hungry Frank Underwood (Kevin Spacey). Released in its entirety on Netflix on May 30, the fifth season of House of Cards contained some eerie ...

and more »

See more here:
Liberals Celebrate Parallels Between 'House of Cards' and Trump - NewsBusters (blog)

Alberta Liberals elect David Khan as new leader – Calgary Herald

David Khan.

The newly elected leader of the Alberta Liberals says he will focus on rebuilding and re-energizing the party.

Calgary lawyer David Khan won the leadership Sunday evening with 54.8 per cent of the vote, defeating his sole opponent, Kerry Cundal. There were 1,671 total votes and 10 abstentions.

Its been a whirlwind, its been a really busy past two months, but Im so excited about the energy in this room, Khan told a room of supporters at Hotel Arts.

There are so many Liberals, old and new, that are part of our party now and Im really excited about moving liberalism forward in Alberta.

Khan served as the Alberta Liberals executive vice-president before entering the race. He ran as a candidate in Calgary-Buffalo in the 2015 provincial election and as a byelection candidate in Calgary-West in 2014.

His immediate focus is to unite liberals in Alberta and become a real force in the next provincial election.

Make no mistake, it is not Liberal ideas, it is not Liberal values and its not even the Liberal name that has held our party back. We need to stay true to ourselves and who we are and what we stand for, he said.

Theres new people, theres new energy, and we need a new vision and need to move this province forward for the benefit of all.

The only Liberal to be elected in the 2015 general election was Calgary-Mountain View MLA David Swann. Khan hopes to dramatically improve on that result.

That was a change election, that was an anomaly. Thats not the support that we have going forward, he said.

Khan said organizing, fundraising and electing more Liberals are the most crucial areas that need improvement.

Financial reports for the first quarter posted on the Elections Alberta website in April showed the Alberta Liberals and its constituency associations raised $47,959 for the period. For comparison, the governing NDP took in $373,060.

History isnt why we are here today, Khan said. We are here for the future, and it looks promising for Liberals and all Albertans.

Read the rest here:
Alberta Liberals elect David Khan as new leader - Calgary Herald

Liberals Challenge Big Telecom In Fight For Affordable Wireless – Huffington Post Canada

The federal Liberals say wireless prices in Canada are too high, and have ordered the countrys telecom watchdog to carry out a review that could lead to less expensive mobile phone services.

Innovation Minister Navdeep Bains announced Monday he is ordering the CRTC to review a decision from earlier this year. That decision effectively prevented discount wireless companies from offering services based mostly on wi-fi connections and by roaming on other companies networks.

The prosperity of Canadians depends on their access to affordable Internet and wireless services. These services are no longer luxuries, Bains said in a statement. They are basic tools for all Canadians regardless of where they live.

Innovation Minister Navdeep Bains.

Speaking at the Canadian Telecom Summit on Monday, Bains highlighted that many rural areas in Canada still lack Internet and wireless services.

Access isnt the only challenge, the bigger barrier is price, Bains said, as quoted at Bloomberg. The digital divide is unacceptable.

Wireless companies known as mobile virtual network operators (MVNOs) have been operating in the U.S and elsewhere for some time. They use a combination of wi-fi access and roaming on competitors' networks to offer wireless services. The CRTC ruled in March that big telecom companies dont have to sell wholesale roaming access to these types of wireless companies.

The Liberals announcement is certain to put the government at odds with Bell, Rogers and Telus, which between them control some 90 per cent of Canadas wireless market.

It also means the Liberals are taking up a cause championed by the previous Conservative government, which moved aggressively to increase competition in Canadas telecom markets, but met with little success.

The three most prominent startup wireless companies Mobilicity, Public Mobile and Wind Mobile were all bought out by the big three telecoms in recent years. Those three were not MVNO's, though they did rely on the big telecoms' networks. Wind Mobile recently rebranded to Freedom Mobile.

Wireless carriers like the now-defunct Mobilicity failed to make much of an impact in Canada's mobile market.

The government is clearly sending a signal to incumbents that it wants more affordable wireless plans in the market, which could be a popular policy in the context of upcoming elections in the not-too-distant future, Desjardins telecom analyst Maher Yaghi wrote in a client note.

Yaghi said that although Canada could see MVNOs come into the market, its likelier that Big Telecom will head off the threat and lower their prices.

They could pre-empt any drastic policy decision by offering lower-end wireless plans, similar to those that Rogers and Telus offer in Internet, Yaghi wrote.

Consumer activist group OpenMedia lauded the Liberals move, saying it could lead to lower prices and greater choice for Canadian consumers and small businesses.

The rest is here:
Liberals Challenge Big Telecom In Fight For Affordable Wireless - Huffington Post Canada

The Democrats are fighting over superdelegates — again …

A "unity reform commission" the party created last July -- made up of leaders selected separately by Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders -- is tasked with making a recommendation by the end of this year: Keep superdelegates, eliminate them, or something in between.

"I think tensions will definitely start to rise as we get into the nitty-gritty of proposals," said Jane Kleeb, the Nebraska Democratic chairwoman and a Sanders selection for the unity commission.

"But I'm confident -- and I guess hoping, at the same time -- that it's not just, 'Oh, you're a Bernie delegate, so of course you think that way,'" added Kleeb, who rose to national prominence as an activist against the Keystone XL pipeline.

The unity commission is headed into its second of four meetings this week in San Antonio. Superdelegates aren't officially on the agenda until the third meeting, in Chicago in August -- but several commission members said they expect behind-the-scenes talks on the issue to intensify over the summer.

Superdelegates became a flashpoint in the Clinton vs. Sanders contest, when members of Congress and other party leaders given the special status to cast a vote for their choice for the Democratic presidential nominee regardless of their states' results overwhelmingly backed Clinton, in some cases allowing her to carry more delegates than Sanders in states where he won the primary or caucus.

They didn't ultimately tip the nomination to Clinton -- she won more pledged delegates than Sanders, too -- but Sanders' backers felt their early endorsements left many Democrats believing that Clinton's nomination was predetermined.

Beating back efforts by Sanders' supporters to eliminate superdelegates at July's convention, the DNC launched a commission to study the issue -- and started with the recommendation that members of Congress, governors and other elected officials retain their status, but that other party leaders lose it, potentially reducing the number of superdelegates by two-thirds.

"To go beyond that would be a push," acknowledged Larry Cohen, a Democratic labor leader who is the unity panel's co-chairman and the chairman of the Sanders-aligned Our Revolution.

Even if the unity commission sticks with that recommendation, it would then need the approval of the DNC's Rules Committee and the full DNC.

Implementing at least that recommendation, though, Cohen said, is key, "because obviously this is aimed at 2020 and the DNC has to adopt it in some way."

A leading proponent on the unity commission for keeping superdelegates in their current role, several members said, is Rep. Marcia Fudge of Ohio, a Clinton selection to the panel. Fudge declined an interview request.

The superdelegate system has been in place since the 1980s, when Democrats sought to avoid blowout losses like George McGovern had suffered in 1972 and President Jimmy Carter faced in 1980 by increasing the influence of party insiders.

After the 2008 contest between Clinton, Barack Obama and John Edwards, a panel recommended reducing superdelegates' influence, but the DNC never adopted the changes.

Other proposals to curb the influence of superdelegates that have floated around in conversations with unity commission members -- including private conference calls the Clinton and Sanders sides are holding -- includes keeping superdelegates but requiring them to vote according to their states' results.

It's one of several changes Sanders' supporters hope to make. They are also seeking major changes to presidential debate scheduling, and are pushing to open primaries and caucuses to independents. The commission is also expected to examine the party's nominating calendar -- which features the overwhelmingly white Iowa and New Hampshire voting first, and a geographic mishmash of states voting in clusters on the same day.

The commission also includes members appointed by new DNC Chairman Tom Perez. And panel members described the early conversations as "Kumbaya" moments, even as they anticipate fights later this year.

"I think for us, we're essentially not assuming that the Clinton or Perez delegates are only status quo thinking. In that until they prove otherwise, we're going to continue on that mindset," Kleeb said.

Read the original:
The Democrats are fighting over superdelegates -- again ...

Trump Calls Democrats ‘Obstructionists,’ But He’s Only Nominated 11 Ambassadors – NPR

President Trump speaks during a meeting with business leaders in the State Department Library on the White House complex on April 11. Evan Vucci/AP hide caption

President Trump speaks during a meeting with business leaders in the State Department Library on the White House complex on April 11.

President Trump took to Twitter on Monday to complain about Democratic "OBSTRUCTIONISTS," blaming the Senate for being slow to approve his nominees, including his ambassadors.

A spokesman for the ranking Democrat on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee threw it right back, saying Trump should be spending less time on Twitter and more time actually filling those positions.

So far, Secretary of State Rex Tillerson and his deputy John Sullivan are the only Senate-approved top officials in Trump's State Department. The White House hasn't nominated any undersecretaries or assistant secretaries those jobs are being filled on an acting basis by career foreign service officers.

Overseas, the picture is similar. Trump has nominated only 11 ambassadors, including Nikki Haley to the United Nations, Terry Branstad for China and David Friedman for Israel. Those three have been confirmed, as have two career Foreign Service officers for postings in Africa. There are nearly 190 ambassadorships.

It's that lack of nominations that's the real issue, tweeted Sen. Ben Cardin of Maryland, the committee's top Democrat.

The remaining six nominations are pending in the Republican-controlled Senate, though some are recent nominations and some haven't turned in the necessary paperwork. Callista Gingrich, the Trump administration's choice for U.S. ambassador to the Vatican, is in the latter camp. Trump's pick to serve in Japan, Bill Hagerty, is awaiting a Foreign Relations Committee vote, while Scott Brown is awaiting a full Senate vote to become ambassador to New Zealand.

A Republican staffer says the committee "continues to review and process all nominations in a rigorous and timely manner."

About two hours after Trump's tweet, Cardin's spokesman, Sean Bartlett, responded:

"The President should get off Twitter and lead his team in sending more ambassadors and other crucial nominees to the Senate. We're ready to do our job, but he needs to do his first. That's how the process works."

The spat over nominations seems to have become an issue after the acting U.S. ambassador to the U.K. praised London's mayor for his leadership in the wake of this weekend's terrorist attack.

Trump blasted Mayor Sadiq Khan for telling residents they have "no reason to be alarmed." Khan was trying to reassure Londoners that they should not be alarmed by the increase police presence in the city. Trump took those words out of context and doubled-down in follow-up tweets Monday.

Back in January, Trump said he would name New York Jets owner and GOP donor Robert "Woody" Johnson to be the next U.S. ambassador to the U.K. However, the White House has yet to actually nominate him.

Read the original here:
Trump Calls Democrats 'Obstructionists,' But He's Only Nominated 11 Ambassadors - NPR