Archive for June, 2017

Black Lives, and Black Second Amendment Rights, Matter – Townhall

|

Posted: Jun 18, 2017 12:01 AM

All lives matter. As do Second Amendment rights.

Which is why the killing of 32-year-old Philando Castile last July was disturbing, and the acquittal of St. Anthony, Minnesota, police officer Jeronimo Yanez, this past Friday, so troubling.

Castiles girlfriend, Diamond Reynolds, who live-streamed the chilling aftermath of the shooting on her cell phone, assumed the traffic stop was for a broken tail-light. But Officer Yanez, four years on the force, stopped Castile believing he might be the perpetrator of a recent robbery. Castile was not; he was merely the same race (black), roughly the same age, and had the same hair-style (dreadlocks).

Of course, many men in the Twin Cities metro area fit those characteristics.

Much about the incident remains unclear and in dispute. What seems indisputable is this: Philando Castile told the Latino officer that he was carrying a gun, for which he had a concealed carry permit. That doesnt sound like an admission someone would make if planning to whip out that pistol and start blasting away.

Also certain is the fact that Officer Yanez fired seven times into the automobile carrying Castile, Reynolds and Reynolds four-year-old daughter. Five bullets struck Castile, two in the heart. One bullet barely missed the toddler strapped into a car seat in the back. Castile later died at a local hospital.

The audio on the cellphone footage, which began after the shots were fired, has Yanez yelling: I told him not to reach for it! I told him to get his hand out.

You told him to get his I.D., sir, his drivers license, Ms. Reynolds responds, almost eerily calm. Please dont tell me, please dont tell me my boyfriend is gone. Please dont tell me hes gone. Please Jesus, no.

Yanez was charged with second-degree manslaughter and reckless discharge of a firearm. The officer testified in court that he fired his weapon after seeing part of the gun emerging from Castiles pocket. Reynolds told jurors that Castile was slowly pulling out his wallet in response to Officer Yanezs request, definitely not his handgun.

The jury was initially deadlocked, ten jurors voting to acquit and two to convict. But the judge urged them to continue deliberating. Though whites outnumbered African Americans on the jury five to one, some jurors told reporters that the two jurors initially favoring conviction were not the two black jurors.

Late in the deliberations, the jury requested to again review several videos introduced into evidence. The two videos the judge allowed them to re-watch were an interview of Diamond Reynolds and the dash-cam recording from the police car. The dash-cam recording has not been released to the public.

Last Friday, the jury unanimously acquitted Officer Yanez of all three charges.

Mistakes happen. Deadly ones, even. One can certainly sympathize with the plight of police fearing for their safety at traffic stops, which they know can turn deadly in an instant. Yet, law enforcement officers cannot go around blowing away innocent people because they are scared.

A young man who worked as a supervisor at a public school cafeteria and had no criminal record is dead. Many others black and white are dead in incidents that suspiciously lack good explanations. There is nothing in our American can-do spirit that accepts fatal errors. Especially repeated ones.

What to do?

Lets outfit police with body cameras. And lets write the rules for those cameras as voters in Ferguson, Missouri, did last April by passing a ballot initiative such that (1) police face repercussions for not having the cameras on, and (2) the footage is made publicly available, so people know there will be accountability and no cover-ups.

Then-President Obamas Justice Department investigated the 2014 shooting of Michael Brown in Ferguson and found that Brown was at fault, as the aggressor, not the police officer. Had body cam footage been publicly released the riots that followed may not have erupted. Citizens would have been saved millions in property damage and spared the divide along racial and political lines all across the nation.

In other instances, body cams might help convict the cops.

Still, even with body camera footage available, it seems difficult to gain convictions against police when they clearly err by killing innocent folks. Numerous cases of police shooting unarmed men have been caught on video and yet either not resulted in officers being prosecuted or with officers acquitted of charges.

Like Officer Yanez, the officers are often removed from the police force. But too late.

Police need better training on how to protect both themselves and citizens they encounter. Too much of the current training appears to encourage a warrior ethic of shoot-first and ask-questions-later. In fact, Officer Yanez attended a controversial seminar called the Bulletproof Warrior in 2014, which some police forces have discouraged their officers from attending.

Yet, even with better training, and with cameras always rolling, the problem wont be solved completely. I do not have all the answers, but as Americans we must find those answers.

Rarely do I agree with Washington Post columnist Eugene Robinson, but hes hard to rebut when, after police killed Philando Castile in Minnesota and Keith Lamont Scott in North Carolina, last year, he wrote, If you are a black man in America, exercising your constitutional right to keep and bear arms can be fatal.

Black lives matter. Blacks Second Amendment rights matter. If we cannot protect black lives and rights, we cannot protect white lives and rights. Much less all lives and rights.

BREAKING: UN Mission Official Says Terror Attack Underway in Mali Resort Area Popular With Foreigners

See more here:
Black Lives, and Black Second Amendment Rights, Matter - Townhall

Rep. Mo Brooks: Baseball shooting doesn’t change Second … – Washington Examiner

Rep. Mo Brooks said Wednesday's shooting at the Republicans' congressional baseball practice has not altered his view of the Second Amendment.

Brooks, R-Ala., was on deck to bat and gave a harrowing account of the gunfire. Asked later whether it had affected his views on gun control, Brooks said, "not with respect to the Second Amendment."

"The Second Amendment right to bear arms is to ensure that we always have a republic. And as with any other constitutional provision in the Bill of Rights, there are adverse aspects to each of those rights that we enjoy as people. And what we just saw here is one of the bad side effects of someone not exercising those rights properly."

Brooks said many amendment rights besides the Second Amendment can have "adverse aspects" as well.

"We're not going to get rid of freedom of speech because some people say some really ugly things that hurt other people's feelings," Brooks said. "We're not going to get rid of Fourth Amendment search and seizure rights because it allows some criminals to go free who should be behind bars. These rights are there to protect Americans, and while each of them has a negative aspect to them, they are fundamental to our being the greatest nation in world history."

Read more:
Rep. Mo Brooks: Baseball shooting doesn't change Second ... - Washington Examiner

Efforts to Rescue Migrants Caused Deadly, Unexpected Consequences – New York Times


U.S. News & World Report
Efforts to Rescue Migrants Caused Deadly, Unexpected Consequences
New York Times
... of a wrenching Catch-22: Any effort to lessen the migrant crisis can backfire as smuggling networks devise even more dangerous strategies in response. Here is how those strategies have pushed desperate migrants into even more desperate situations.
IOM, Niger Authorities Rescue 92 Abandoned MigrantsU.S. News & World Report

all 32 news articles »

See the original post:
Efforts to Rescue Migrants Caused Deadly, Unexpected Consequences - New York Times

ICE chief has ‘zero regrets’ about saying illegal immigrants ‘should be afraid’ here’s why – TheBlaze.com

Immigration and Customs Enforcement Acting Director Thomas Homan defended his saying last week that illegal immigrants should be afraid, but CNN buried his justification based on humanitarian grounds in their article Friday.

Homan had made the comments before Congress last week, but expanded on why he said what many might find controversial.

It needed to be said, Homan explained. And by me saying you should be worried, you should be afraid if you lie on your taxes, youve got to be worried, Is the IRS going to audit me? When you speed down the highway, youve got to worry, Am I going to get a speeding ticket? You worry. Its natural human behavior.

But he also explained that he had seen many terrible horrors as the result of lax immigration enforcement, and by enforcing the law in a strict manner, those evils could be prevented.

Why am I so strong in what Im trying to do? Homan said. Because people havent seen what Tom Homans seen They havent seen the dead immigrants on a trail that were left stranded. They werent in Phoenix, Arizona when these organizations were holding people hostage, raping the women, molesting the children, killing people that couldnt pay their smuggling fees, doubling their smuggling fees after they got to the United States.

People werent standing with me in Victoria, Texas, in the back of a tractor trailer with 19 dead aliens including a five-year-old child laying dead under his father that suffocated in the back of this tractor trailer by these smuggling organizations, he challenged.

CNN only added this humanitarian reasoning in the last of their 17-paragraph article.

Even illegal immigration advocate and Univision anchor Jorge Ramos admitted that the precipitous drop in illegal immigration meant that fewer migrants would make the dangerous trek to the United States, preventing many tragedies.

Homan also dismantled the oft-used argument that strict immigration policies break up families.

The constant story about us separating families, he explained, when someone enters this country illegally, or someone overstays their visa, they know theyre in this country illegally. If they take it upon themselves to have a child in this country and becomes a US citizen by birth, he put his family in that position, not ICE, not Border Patrol. And to vilify the men and women of ICE as separating families is unfair.

Homan continued to argue that when local authorities impose sanctuary city policies, they force ICE to sweep illegal aliens at their homes and other places. These actions are then falsely reported as raids to vilify immigration enforcement.

Is ICE putting the fear in the community or is it other people putting fear in the community? Homan said. The false stories out there (are) whats sending the chill down the spine of the immigrant community. If I had the cooperation I needed, most of these arrests could be made in a county jail.

ICE has reported an unprecedented drop in illegal border crossings, while arrests have increased considerably since President Trump entered the Oval Office.

Go here to see the original:
ICE chief has 'zero regrets' about saying illegal immigrants 'should be afraid' here's why - TheBlaze.com

It’s time for Mike Pence to come clean – The Hill (blog)

The key question after James Comeys testimony is: What did Mike PenceMike (Michael) Richard PenceIts time for Mike Pence to come clean Dem: Trump has 'incredible emphasis on jobs, jobs, jobs' for lawyers Pence to visit Central, South America in August MORE know, and when did he know it?

Yes, the question the nation asked more than a generation ago during Watergate is the same question which needs to be asked in the latest White House scandal.

Lets go through some key facts and dates:

Dec. 29, 2016: Flynn speaks with Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak about the sanctions recently placed on Russia by the Obama administration.

Dec. 30: Vladimir Putin announces that Russia will not take action in response to the sanctions.

Jan. 4, 2017: Flynn informs the Trump transition team, which Pence headed, that he is under investigation for failing to register as an agent of the Turkish government.

Jan. 12: The Washington Post reports that Flynn and Kislyak spoke the day before Putins announcement.

Jan. 14: Flynn and Pence speak about the situation. Pence claims that Flynn told him that the sanctions against Russia were not discussed with Kislyak.

Jan. 15: Pence goes on Face the Nation and states that Flynn did not discuss sanctions with the Russian ambassador a statement that proved blatantly false.

Jan. 26: Sally Yates and an aide go to the White House to speak with Don McGahn, the White House counsel. They explain that Flynn has been compromised and that he needs to inform the President, Vice President, and others.

Jan. 27: McGahn asks Yates to return to the White House to further discuss the matter.

Jan. 30: Trump fires Yates after she refuses to enforce his travel ban.

Feb. 9: The Washington Post reports that Flynn discussed the sanctions with Kislyak. A spokesperson for Pence claims that the VP had been unaware.

Feb. 10: Donald TrumpDonald TrumpTrump earns 8M as Mar-a-Lago profits spike FBI refuses to release Comey memos while investigation ongoing Yes, Trump is privatizing the VA MORE also claims that he was unaware that Flynn and Kislyak had discussed sanctions.

February 13th: It is reported that the White House knew about the nature of Flynns discussions with Kislyak for weeks.

Now we come to James Comeys testimony. According to Comey, as far as he understood it, the Vice President was aware of the nature of Flynns discussion with Kislyak.

If you are to believe otherwise, youd have to be willing to believe that somehow others in the White House knew, including the President, but not the Vice President, who was busy speaking on news outlets and saying the complete opposite.

Youd have to believe that McGahn, who, according to Sean Spicer, conducted an exhaustive and extensive questioning of Flynn, did not, for some reason, inform the Vice President. It would mean that either McGahn was not doing his job and Pence didnt know, or Pence is not telling the truth and covering the White House.

Shouldnt we ask McGahn in order to find out?

And why wouldnt Trump stop Pence from repeating the inaccurate information?

And if Pence isnt telling the truth, we again must ask why. Why would Pence continually mislead the public about his knowledge of Flynns interaction with Kislyak?

If you ask yourself that question, you cant help but reach the conclusion that it could only be for nefarious purposes.

Comey also indicated that Attorney General Jeff SessionsJeff SessionsTrump allies Roger Stone, Jesse Ventura launch pro-cannabis group Its time for Mike Pence to come clean Dem: Trump has 'incredible emphasis on jobs, jobs, jobs' for lawyers MORE potentially could not be trusted when it came to the Russia/Flynn situation.

Again: Why?

Then, when Comey himself refused to let the Russia matter drop, he was pressured by Trump and then suddenly and unceremoniously canned. Coincidence?

The question remains: What happened between Pence and McGahn and why was the Vice President continuing to make claims that the administration knew were false?

Can Mr. Pence answer that one?

Ross Rosenfeld is a political pundit who has written for Newsday, the New York Daily News, Charles Scribner's, MacMillan, Newsweek.com, Primedia and The Hill.

The views expressed by contributors are their own and are not the views of The Hill.

More here:
It's time for Mike Pence to come clean - The Hill (blog)