Archive for June, 2017

Salena Zito column: The fate of the Democrats’ future may lie in Georgia – Richmond.com

In the middle of the last century, Ringgold, Ga., was the town that expedited the formation of an institution that built the country in that era: namely, early marriage. At the time, you could get married at the age of 15 provided you had the consent of your parents or guardian and, thanks to Ringgolds 45-minute blood test, you could get married quickly.

Word got out rapidly, and this tiny little town just over the Tennessee state line became known as the marriage mecca of the Southeast and the mid-Atlantic. It fulfilled the hasty youthful heart expediently and enabled the young serviceman and his bride to get married before he shipped off to war.

Even the towns name sounded full of marital promise, notwithstanding it was named after a celebrated general rather than a wedding band.

Seventy years later, Stacey Evans, a Democratic representative from that town, hopes to ride todays trend in family life, single parenting, into the Georgia governors mansion.

She is doing so by chronicling her life story with photos and video clips of the 16 homes of her childhood, her living with a single mom and no father, and trying to avoid bill collectors or her mothers unsavory boyfriends. Once when I was 12 and we lived here, Evans narrates as a video clip of one home darts across the screen, I called the police while one of them was beating her.

The police said that they knew him and that he wouldnt do such a thing, so they didnt come, and so he kept beating her.

On always being one step ahead of a bill collector, Evans says: Living like that affects a child. You end up looking for something you can hold onto.

Welcome to the political race in Georgia that America is not paying attention to but should be.

Why?

Because the primary contest between Evans and a fellow Democrat, state House Minority Leader Stacey Abrams, will have the biggest impact on the future of the national party. It reflects the battle within the national Democratic Partys ranks over where it goes from here.

Here in this case is the slinking around of Americas minority party with no message, no firepower, no aspirational missive and no plan for how to get out from under all of that.

Abrams comes from the partys urban school of thought, which is that campaigning is all about manpower.

Evans is running a campaign based on a story an important economic story that appeals to the white blue-collar voters Georgia Democrats lost to Donald Trump.

The question is: Will that story work? Or do Democrats merely need to turn out more of their urban and ethnic base?

They have been saying forever and a day that Georgia is the next state they intend to flip in their favor. They promised to do just that during the presidential election, and again in last weeks special election in the 6th Congressional District for an open House seat.

But it wasnt even close either time.

Its not that Democrats havent tried hard in Georgia. They tried to win the Senate race in 2014 with celebrated former U.S. Sen. Sam Nunns daughter, and she lost. They just tried with John Ossoff in the 6th District race, and he lost.

They have to start winning elections in Georgia eventually for Georgia to be a true battleground.

There will be a big question as to whats the best way to win. Is it to maximize turnout among African-Americans and transplants in the Atlanta area, or is it to claw back the rural blue-collar voters that Democrats ancestrally had when they used to win in the state? That is a serious existential question for Democratic operatives.

Both of these women are very strong candidates for governor.

Evans campaign is about the HOPE scholarship, a scholarship funded by the Georgia Lottery. Her powerful life story, portrayed so well in her campaign video, shows she was in a family cycle of poverty until the scholarship came along.

During Gov. Zell Millers days in the state capitol, he made Georgia the first state in the South to pass the lottery specifically for college scholarships. Anybody with a B average got one. And everybody else in the South since emulated that.

Evans is literally running right at the trailer park of rural Georgia. One issue with which such people still identify with the Democrats, for the most part, is public schools.

Abrams is a Yale Law School grad known for her fiery speeches, her national profile, a passion for mobilizing and energizing minority voters, and her prolificacy in penning numerous romance novels. Unfortunately for her, she voted to reduce HOPE scholarship funding.

In short, Evans has a message designed to appeal to rural, independent and conservative voters, and Abrams stands for a future in Georgia that is centered in urban Atlanta.

The truth is most Democrats in Washington think that the urban Atlanta model is most likely to succeed because of where the numbers are, which makes Republican strategists in Washington and Georgia happy.

It is the race that nobody is talking about and everyone should be talking about when it comes to the future of both the Democratic and Republican parties. With an exiting Republican governor who is not that popular and a lackluster Republican field in the state facing either an energized progressive or an energized blue-collar moderate, Democrats might finally catch that windmill theyve been chasing in the Peach State.

Visit link:
Salena Zito column: The fate of the Democrats' future may lie in Georgia - Richmond.com

Deutsche Bank Refuses Democrats’ Request for Reports on Trump – Bloomberg

By

June 29, 2017, 7:15 PM EDT

Deutsche Bank AG intensified its fight with Democrats over their requests for information related to loans to President Donald Trump, saying the German lender cannot legally turn over the documents.

In a letter on Thursday, lawyers for Deutsche Bank wrote that confidential financial information cannot be turned over to individual members of Congress -- but could potentially be turned over in response to a formal congressional committee request.

The information had been requested by five Democratic lawmakers, including Representative Maxine Waters of California, the top Democrat on the Financial Services Committee.

Earlier this year, the Democrats asked for its findings on two politically charged matters: banking on behalf of now-President Donald Trump, and trades from the banks Moscow operation that helped move some $10 billion out of Russia. They also asked for any internal review of Trumps business dealings with the bank, descriptions of which have surfaced in news reports.

The Thursday letter was part of back-and-forth correspondence with lawmakers over what can be turned over under the law.

We respectfully disagree with the suggestion that Deutsche Bank freely may reveal confidential financial information in response to requests from individual members of Congress, lawyers for the bank at Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP wrote to the lawmakers.

Earlier: Deutsche Bank in Bind Over How to Modify $300 Million Trump Debt

In a letter earlier this month, the Democrats argued that federal laws forbidding the disclosure of client information to a government authority dont apply to Congress, since the legislative branch isnt an agency or department of the government.

That letter chided Deutsche Bank for refusing to acknowledge even the existence of the internal reports, which have been cited in the press. Waters and her fellow Democrats also contend that banking-secrecy laws, which are designed to protect client confidentiality, cant be used to hide potentially fraudulent conduct.

"This bank has lent hundreds of millions of dollars to Donald Trump and his family members, and reportedly conducted an internal review of whether their accounts had any ties to Russia," said Waters in a statement.

"Efforts by Trump, his family members and associates, and Deutsche Bank to avoid scrutiny only intensify our resolve to follow the Trump money trail," she said.

See the original post:
Deutsche Bank Refuses Democrats' Request for Reports on Trump - Bloomberg

Delaware Democrats try to strong-arm GOP over budget impasse – News & Observer

Delaware Democrats try to strong-arm GOP over budget impasse
News & Observer
Democratic lawmakers tried unsuccessfully to strong-arm Republicans late Thursday as an impasse over a budget for the fiscal year starting Saturday continued to escalate. Amid public criticism and partisan bickering over a decision by the Democratic ...

and more »

Originally posted here:
Delaware Democrats try to strong-arm GOP over budget impasse - News & Observer

Health Care Bill Latest: Will Republicans and Democrats Work Together? – NBCNews.com


NBCNews.com
Health Care Bill Latest: Will Republicans and Democrats Work Together?
NBCNews.com
Health Care Bill Latest: Will Republicans and Democrats Work Together? Thu, Jun 29. In an effort to reach a compromise, some moderate GOP senators are considering redrafting the health care bill to include items that could bring Democratic senators on ...

Read more:
Health Care Bill Latest: Will Republicans and Democrats Work Together? - NBCNews.com

Trump’s aggressive immigration enforcement is overwhelming an already taxed court system – Los Angeles Times

Increased immigration enforcement has been one of the hallmarks of the Trump administration, with federal agents directed to seek the deportation of just about anyone they find in the country illegally no matter how long the person might have lived here or how deep the ties to family and community. In the first 100 days after the presidents inauguration, immigration arrests climbed nearly 40% over the previous year, a pace that will almost certainly increase if Congress accedes to President Trumps request to hire an additional 10,000 Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents to be assigned to the nations interior, and another 5,000 Border Patrol agents to work within 100 miles of the border.

Those buying into Trumps view of illegal immigrants as rapists, murderers and job stealers have no doubt been cheered by the enforcement effort, and they probably arent bothered by the rush to expand detention space to house those facing deportation hearings. But even they should recognize that capturing and incarcerating people is only part of the equation.

While the government under President Obama and now Trump has been ramping up immigration enforcement and detention, it has not invested a parallel amount of money in expanding the immigration courts capacity to handle the cases. Spending on immigration courts increased only 74% from 2003-2015 while enforcement spending went up 105%. Trumps 2018 budget would increase the total number of judicial positions, but its not clear if that will become law and for the moment the backlog of cases is continuing to grow.

At the end of September, the number of pending immigration cases stood at 516,031, according to data collected by the Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse at Syracuse University. By the end of May, that backlog had jumped to 598,943 cases, which have been pending for an average of 670 days each. New York City has the biggest backlog (78,670 cases), followed by Los Angeles (57,090).

Making matters worse, the Trump administration has temporarily reassigned judges to detention centers in Southern California, Arizona, New Mexico and Texas to handle cases primarily involving recent border-crossers. The problem with that is that fewer people are getting caught at the border these days, so moving judges there makes little sense. Why then is it happening? The answer: Optics. Sending judges to the border looks like a commitment to stronger and more serious enforcement, when in reality its a Potemkin effort that exacerbates backlogs in the courts from which the judges are transferred. At the same time, immigration lawyers say government attorneys have lately become tougher in their cases, taking harder lines with immigrants and reopening cases that had been suspended, adding more drag on the system.

This enormous backlog has real-life consequences. People in detention centers or jails are spending more time incarcerated as they await hearings on whether they will be allowed to remain in the country. For those with legitimate requests for asylum or other relief from deportation, the delays prolong uncertainty about whether they have found a sanctuary.

This should not make the anti-illegal immigration folks happy. If people arent getting deported but are just stuck in limbo in the immigration system, then Trumps ramped-up enforcement program is a chimera. Those immigrants who should be found ineligible to remain in the country because of criminal pasts or other disqualifications wind up, in effect, with open-ended reprieves.

The system is not working well for anybody except, perhaps, the operators of private prisons and local jails with ICE contracts that handle most of the detained immigrants. For a president who prides himself on his business and managerial acumen, this is a grotesquely failed approach to management.

Instead of taking this piecemeal approach to immigration enforcement, the administration should work with Congress to develop comprehensive immigration reform legislation that would create a path to citizenship for those who have established roots in our communities while tightening up enforcement at the border and tackling visa overstays. The Republican Party controls the White House and Congress. It has no excuses for not getting this done.

Follow the Opinion section on Twitter @latimesopinion or Facebook

Read the rest here:
Trump's aggressive immigration enforcement is overwhelming an already taxed court system - Los Angeles Times