Archive for June, 2017

In the Trump era, Obama nostalgia is a booming industry – Los Angeles Times

Pat Cunnane spent six years in the White House helping to promote Barack Obamas message. From the outside, he still does: On Tuesday, Cunnane became the latest Obama alumnus to land a contract for a book on his experiences.

While much of the world obsesses about the more impetuous musings of President Trump or perhaps in reaction to that obsession a new market for Obama nostalgia is manifest in the growing number of books, podcasts and TV and film treatments by or involving young veterans from the Obama stable.

Gallery Books, an imprint of Simon & Schuster, has signed on to publish Cunnanes recollections of his coming of age, starting at 22 years old, in the White House press office, a book tentatively called West Winging It: An Unpresidential Memoir.

"For six years, working in the Obama White House was all I knew. When that came to an end a few months ago, lets just say I didnt take it well, Cunnane said.

Writing proved cathartic. Retelling stories of the historic moments as well as the mundane and absurd ones helped stave off the sadness that I felt, Cunnane said.

Humor helped, too. Even before the news of Cunnanes Obama book, he gained a bit of fame for his Trump tweets, or, rather, his unique retweet. To make a serious and widely shared point that the current presidents tweets, however unpresidential, should be treated as official White House statements Cunnane did just that, putting his old White House skills to work in a tweet that took off.

All of Trumps Tweets should be mocked up in the correct Presidential statement format, he posted. Its telling.

To illustrate, Cunnane provided a mock-up of an official White House statement based on one of Trumps more undiplomatic tweets, about a London terrorist attack.

The Internet being the social medium it is, Cunnanes idea was quickly realized. A Web developer, Russel Neiss, created an automated feed, @realPressSecBot, that immediately tweets out Trumps 140-character posts as if they were formal White House statements. The account attracted more than 100,000 followers within a week.

Trumps remarks like those against the federal investigation he calls a witch hunt look all the more out of place when showcased in the official-looking way long reserved, through Republican and Democratic administrations, for sober presidential statements carefully scrutinized before publication by aides such as Cunnane.

Cunnane is now living in Los Angeles where he is part of the writing team for ABCs Designated Survivor, featuring Keifer Sutherland as another unexpected occupant of the Oval Office. The Mark Gordon Company, which produces Designated Survivor, also has plans to produce the book for television.

The deals reflect the burgeoning market for Obama-related works, beyond the Obamas own lucrative book contracts.

A memoir by Alyssa Mastromonaco, a close aide to Obama on his 2008 campaign and in the White House, was an unexpected bestseller this year and has been optioned for TV. David Litt, a former Obama speechwriter, began working on a book about his time in the administration last year, but, he said, it came into clearer focus after the election.

Once Trump won, it felt suddenly more urgent to document what happened, not because we did things perfectly we certainly didnt do things perfectly but because this idea that government could be animated by a sense of fundamental goodness and decency suddenly seemed like a relic from some ancient history, Litt said.

It became a lot easier to figure out what to write about and what to think about some of the experiences that we went through.

His books title, Thanks, Obama, borrows from the wry aside that Obama expropriated from critics and often used when describing positive developments for which he seemed to get no credit, at least as he and his supporters saw it.

People are approaching the book as escapist literature in a way I appreciate, but didn't expect, said Litt, who now leads the Washington office of Funny or Die, the comedy video website and production company.

Theres some precedent for the left finding solace in the arts. The West Wing debuted on television at the end of the Clinton administration, written in part by veterans of his tenure, but it flourished as a parallel reality during George W. Bushs administration.

The NBC drama has gotten something of a second life as liberals rediscover it on streaming platforms such as Netflix. When Hrishikesh Hirway launched a podcast in early 2016 reliving the series episode-by-episode, he expected each one might attract 25,000 downloads. The first episode was downloaded more than 600,000 times.

Hirway said the size of the audience hasnt changed since Trumps election, though some listeners told him they had to take a break from watching the show because the contrast between the portrayal of an idealistically liberal Bartlet administration and Trumps is too jarring. To the extent the show changed, it was in how the podcasters discussed events and issues depicted in the series to compare them to real life.

Suddenly those questions took on a greater urgency, Hirway said.

Cunnane views his book as something of West Wing meets Veep. It will draw on the range of experiences he had in the White House, from the less glamorous duties corralling reporters shadowing Obamas events to the heady ones, like helping the president prepare for interviews and public appearances. He claims that he debated Jerry Seinfeld about closing punchlines for Obamas appearance on Comedians in Cars Getting Coffee. He lost, of course.

"I had no idea what I was doing when I first started at the White House, Cunnane freely admits. He made an early poor impression by asking a co-worker: Whats a POTUS? Now, of course, that once insider-y shorthand for President of the United States is common knowledge certainly, at least, to any Twitter user.

michael.memoli@latimes.com

For more White House coverage, follow @mikememoli on Twitter.

ALSO:

Originally posted here:
In the Trump era, Obama nostalgia is a booming industry - Los Angeles Times

LA drivers could soon add Obama Boulevard to their commute – LA Daily News

Barack Obama could soon hear his name being uttered as part of Angelenos driving directions, with a Los Angeles city councilman proposing to name a street after him.

Obama Boulevard could prove a relatively more innocuous role for the 44th presidents name than Obamajam the oft-used term to refer to the anticipated congestion that accompanied his frequent fundraising trips to the Los Angeles area.

RELATED STORY: This stretch of LA County freeway could soon be renamed Barack Obama Freeway

RELATED STORY: LAs 101 Freeway is highway from hell

RELATED STORY: Cool pavement to cut urban street heat gets first California tryout in Canoga Park

City Council President Herb Wesson wants to rename a 3.4-mile segment of Rodeo Road, between Jefferson Boulevard and Arlington Avenue, after Obama because it would be a fitting addition to what is known in his district as presidents row. They are a succession of streets named for three of the countrys founding fathers George Washington, John Adams and Thomas Jefferson.

Wesson said the street also has a story to tell about the most recent former president.

Rancho Cienega Park on Rodeo Road was where Obama made one of his earliest presidential campaign stops while still a United States senator in 2008. His transportation then was a late-model minivan, according to Wesson. Obama later upgraded to a motorcade, with a specially designed black Cadillac limousine, nicknamed The Beast.

Despite bringing with him much less pomp, circumstance and security than in later years, Obamas visit still generated unprecedented buzz, Wesson said.

The crowd was crazy, and his security for the most part wound up being this big guy that used to work for me nicknamed Big John, who had to use his body and arms to hold people away from Obama, Wesson said.

It was overwhelming, he said. You didnt have crowds like this.

Wesson said his staffers are writing a letter to Obama letting him know about the plan to change the street name, which would require approval by the L.A. City Council and Mayor Eric Garcetti.

Wesson, who lives about four blocks away from Rodeo Rodeo, said that the street was where he and many others first met Obama.

So many good photos were taken at that rally that Wesson made a calendar with them, he said. Now, he is hoping to mark that moment in another way.

Advertisement

It was history, he said. And who knows how people report history, but when they talk about his first official campaign stop in California, its going to be in an area thats off a street that we named after him. That will live on longer, after me and him.

See the original post:
LA drivers could soon add Obama Boulevard to their commute - LA Daily News

Rand Paul on GOP Healthcare Bill: ‘Looks Like We’re Keeping Obamacare’ – Mediaite

MSNBCs Casey Hunt caught up with Senator Rand Paul in the halls of the Capitol Building this morning to ask his quick thoughts on the Senate version of the GOP Healthcare bill just released.

Paul was an initial and vocal critic of the House health care bill, and it appears that he is also frustrated with the version presented by his Senate colleagues, telling Hunt looks like were keeping Obamacare, not repealing it.

Why is this short and seemingly throw-away line so important? Well the GOP Senate has only the slightest of room to pass this bill as it will take only three Republican senators to vote against it to kill this version. Judging from Pauls comments, it appears that he will not be voting for this iteration of the bill.

The Libertarian leaning Kentucky Senator has promised a statement shortly.

Watch the clip above via MSNBC.

Have a tip we should know? tips@mediaite.com

Continue reading here:
Rand Paul on GOP Healthcare Bill: 'Looks Like We're Keeping Obamacare' - Mediaite

Frustrated with Secretive Health Care Bill, Rand Paul Proposes Giving Senators Time to Read It – Reason (blog)

Ron Sachs/dpa/picture-alliance/NewscomHere's a novel idea. Members of Congress should have time to readfully read, from start to finishthe text of a bill before being asked to vote on it.

Frustrated by a secretive process for rewritting the House's health care bill, Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) said Wednesday that he would reintroduce a resolution requiring the Senate to give its members sufficient time to read lengthy bills before they could be called upon to cast votes. His "Read the Bills" resolution would change Senate rules to require bills and amendments to be filed for one day per 20 pages before they could be considered, giving lawmakers time to digest legislation before giving their vote.

"Legislation is too often shoved through Congress without proper hearings, amendments, or debate, as the secrecy surrounding the Senate's health care bill and the pressure to vote for it with little time to fully evaluate the proposal once again remind us," Paul said in an emailed statement Wednesday.

The Senate version of the American Health Care Act (AHCA) is expected to be unveiled later today, after weeks of secretive work behind closed doors to draft changes to the bill. (UPDATE: The bill has been released. Read Peter Suderman's coverage of it here.)

As passed by the House, the AHCA is 131 pages long. Under Paul's proposed resolution, a 131-page bill would require a period of at least seven days between when it was filed and when it could be voted. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) has promised there won't be a vote until next week, but the Senate version of the bill is likely to grow longer, perhaps much longer, than the House-passed version as amendments are added. For context, the final version of the Affordable Care Act was more than 900 pages long when it was passed in 2010.

"If we are to answer to the American people, it is imperative we pay close attention to the legislation we pass," Paul said.

Paul isn't the only member of the upper chamber to be rankled by the secretive, rushed legislating. Republican Sens. Susan Collins of Maine, Ron Johnson of Wisconsin, and Mike Lee of Utah have expressed concerns about having enough time to read and understand the bill before an expected vote next week. "Even though we thought we were going to be in charge of writing a bill within this working group, it's not being written by us," Lee told Bloomberg News earlier this week. "So if you're frustrated by the lack of transparency in this process, I share your frustration. I share it wholeheartedly."

With 52 Republicans in the Senate, it would take three defectors to block the bill's passage.

Paul is the most likely to jump ship. In addition to his complaints about the process, Paul has been openly dissatisfied the substance of the AHCA since it was first introduced by House Republicans in March, criticizing the bill for not going far enough to repeal taxes and regulatory mandates created under Obamacare. The tax credits included in the billa replacement for Obamacare's subsidies to help low-income Americans afford insurancehave been specifically targeted by Paul as "a new entitlement program."

"My main concern is I promised voters that I would repealvote to repeal Obamacare. And everything I hear sounds like Obamacare-lite," Paul told The Washington Post on Wednesday.

Despite months of criticism of the bill, Paul has not taken an official position on whether he will support it. He told Bloomberg News earlier this week that he would make that decision after seeing the text of the bill.

He will likely get to see it on Thursday. Whether he has time to read the whole thing remains to be seen.

Visit link:
Frustrated with Secretive Health Care Bill, Rand Paul Proposes Giving Senators Time to Read It - Reason (blog)

America illegally at war for a long time now US Senator Rand Paul … – RT

US Senator Rand Paul has spoken out during the debate on war powers, saying that the current wars the US is leading are illegal, and that he isnt voting to go to war in 50 or 60 countries where terrorist powers are now based.

The hearing during which Rand Paul spoke out was the latest one in a yearlong string of debates over what to do with the open-ended 9/11 Proclamation on war authorization.

The divide between the members of Congress over the issue has been growing, with some using this debate for the singular purpose of imposing limitations on our president its just a fact, according to Republican Senator Bob Corker, while others may refuse to limit a president at war in any way.

Paul first of all argued about the role and specifics of Article II of the US Constitution, detailing the presidents duties as commander-in-chief.

He said that the founding fathers of the US George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, Benjamin Franklin among them would disagree with you on saying that Article II gives the president power to commence in war, instead listing it as congressional duty, not presidents at all.

I want to know, are we going to limit the president's power? Are we going to take back our power? Are we going to limit the duration of the war? Are we going to identify our enemy? Paul asked during the statement.

Read more

To lead a war against terrorism at least the way the US might see it is becoming less and less acceptable, Paul said.

Well, just the Islamic State [IS, formerly ISIS/ISIL] is in 32 countries right now. I mean, you add in Taliban and you add in Al-Qaeda, we're probably [talking about] at least 50 or 60 countries. I'm not voting to go to war in 50 or 60 countries.

Thus, there should be a strict and specific limitation for war powers, Paul argued, saying that if they pass something for the sake of it, and not to limit the war powers, it wouldnt be acceptable.

Some people, Paul noted, say that you got all the Article II, and it would just be nice to have an AUMF [Authorization of Use of Military Force].

No, it wouldn't be nice. That's the Constitution. There's supposed to be no war without an AUMF. We have been illegally at war for a long time now. This is illegal war, at this point, he said.

Another key document related to the war powers that is mentioned by Paul is the 9/11 Proclamation, which was very specific to 9/11, and weve had people just saying, you can do anything you want now for 15 years.

Read more

However, there is a practical question related to this, Paul noted.

Is doing anything you want, killing every perceived enemy and every perceived leader or chieftain of five people in some misbegotten village, is it helping?

He gave an example of US forces killing four or five terrorists in a village, but also killing their wives and children: Is it better? Do we have less terrorists now or more?

For a hundred years they'll be talking about the time the Americans came and killed women and children. For a hundred years, they're going to be talking about the Saudis dropping bombs on a funeral procession. That does not go away. These people remember the battle of Karbala in 680AD. They have long memories, Paul said.

We're not going to defeat terrorism by having war in 60-some odd countries and dropping drones on everybody that we think in a village is of a radical ideology. And I just say now, I won't vote for something that doesn't limit the president's power, but simply gives a rubber stamp to what we're doing, the senator concluded.

Originally posted here:
America illegally at war for a long time now US Senator Rand Paul ... - RT