Archive for June, 2017

Liberal moviemaker Rob Reiner: ‘Fight to save Democracy’ from Trump ‘now an all out war’ – TheBlaze.com

Like the character he played in All in the Family way back when, moviemaker Rob Reiner has long been known for his liberal leanings. And he is no fan of Republican President Donald Trump.

Less than two weeks after Republican U.S. Rep. Steve Scalise (R-La.) was seriously wounded by a left-wing gunman during a GOP baseball practice, Reiner went on the attack Sunday with militaristic fervor:

When Fox says that DT colluding with the enemy is not a crime, the fight to save Democracy is now an all out war, Reiner tweeted. US-Stay strong. He added a treason hashtag.

It wasnt the first time Reiner used such rhetoric in reaction to Trump.

Just after the election, Reiner called Trump a moron and said the United States was now fighting the last big major battle since the Civil War.

Reiner later claimed that Russian involvement in the election was the greatest attack on this democracy since 1941 meaning Japans surprise bombing of Pearl Harbor.

He also told MSNBCs Morning Joe months prior to the election that Trumps campaign success was partly due to a lot of people who are racists which prompted co-host Joe Scarborough to reply,Oh, my God. Did you just say that?

Incidentally, reactions to Reiners all out war Tweet werent terribly kind to the famed director:

Original post:
Liberal moviemaker Rob Reiner: 'Fight to save Democracy' from Trump 'now an all out war' - TheBlaze.com

The Twin Authoritarians Who Are Endangering American Democracy – New Republic

This is not how the process is supposed to work. What you sort of realize in watching how Trump has conducted himself [and] in how Mitch McConnell has conducted himself is that [the] functioning democratic process as we know it is not embodied in law or in the Constitution. It depends on both parties ... believing in a set of democratic norms about the value of public input, about the value of transparency, about allowing the public to have a say in whats happening. And if one of those parties ... decides to disavow all those norms, we get to a place where ... this is not American democracy. We basically have an election and live in a quasi-authoritarian state until the next election.

Trumps authoritarianism and McConnells are two very different strains. The president is a narcissist who gathers power for personal gain self-gratification. He cares little for the specifics of policy outcomes, and merely wants victories that he can boast about. For instance, on Friday morning he tweeted

and then appeared on Fox and Friends to make the patently false claim, Ive done in five months what other people havent done in years. Constant displays of alpha-male dominance is also central to Trumps brand of authoritarianism. He taunted his GOP rivals during the Republican primary, and since then has mocked his Democratic foesfirst Hillary Clinton, and now Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer. This week, he tweeted that the House and Senate minority leaders, respectively, were doing the Republicans a favor by remaining in charge, the implication being that theyre ineffective if not incompetent.

This is the authoritarianism of pure spectacle. McConnell, by contrast, is withdrawn and diffident in his public. (Hes jokingly likened to a turtle because of his appearance, but behaves like one, too.) While the majority leader doesnt crave attention, he does care deeply about a specific policy agenda: advancing the plutocratic preferences of the Republican partys donor class. Infinitely more knowledgeable than Trump about how government functions, McConnell subverts norms with a laser-like focus on advancing that agenda. His authoritarianism, in other words, is one of procedure.

As different as they are, these two forms of authoritarianism depend on each other. Its unlikely that the Republican Party would have won a unified government last fall without Trumps theatrical flair. To judge not only by last years election, but also this weeks special congressional election in Georgia, Trumps tribalist politics have far more appeal with the Republican base than a forthright agenda of tax cuts for the rich and entitlement cuts to the poor. And when it comes to that agenda, all that really matters is that the policies be sold through the lens of negative partisanship. After all, Trump campaigned on a promise not to cut Medicaid, whereas McConnells version of the AHCA would slash the program by hundreds of billions of dollars over the next decade. But Trump easily resolves such dissonance by reminding his supporters of the real enemy here: Obamacare.

If the Republican Party needs Trump, the president is equally dependent on the GOP. Given his manifest disinterest in policy and the details of governance, he would be unable to pass anything without crafty leaders like McConnell and House Speaker Paul Ryan. But there is a more sinister dimension to Trumps alliance with these Republican leaders: Congress has the power to check the president, including impeachment and removal if necessary. Ryan and McConnell are the bulwarks protecting Trump from a wide range of areas where he should be held accountable. If they wanted to, they could push for laws requiring him to reveal his taxes, force him to place his assets in a blind trust, and use nepotism rules to limit the power of family members, among a range of other checks.

See the original post:
The Twin Authoritarians Who Are Endangering American Democracy - New Republic

‘Victims of Communism’ Launch Petition to Have Dennis Rodman Removed from Hall of Fame – Eurweb.com

photo source: Twitter.com*

*Former NBA star Dennis Rodman was back in North Korea last week and this time he came bearing some unusual gifts.

On Thursday, Rodman gave the countrys sports minister a copy of Donald Trumps book The Art of the Deal, a present intended for North Korean leader Kim Jong Un. It wasnt signed by Trump and Rodman has said his visit has nothing to do with the White House.

His previous visits in 2013 and 2014 certainly drew controversy, but Rodman said this visit was all about meeting old friends and hitting up a few local attractions. As USA Today reports, Dennis and his small entourage have been spending time hanging out with young North Korean basketball players.

Rodmans arrival last Tuesday came hours after the North decided to release Otto Warmbier, an American university student who had been sentended to 15 years hard labor for trying to steal a propaganda banner.

Following news of Rodmans visit, The Victims of Communism Memorial Foundation launched a petition on change.org calling for the NBA to remove Rodmans from the Naismith Memorial Basketball Hall of Fame following his praise and defense of the of North Korean dictator, per MSN.com.

Peep the clip below:

OTHER NEWS YOU MIGHT HAVE MISSED: Rapper Prodigy of Mobb Deep Dies at 42

In the petition, the foundation said that Rodman has consistently defended Jong-un, who he calls his friend for life.

Otto Warmbier was murdered by the North Korean regime. The barbarous treatment received by this young American at the hands of his North Korean captors is sadly not a unique act, VOC Executive Director Marion Smith said in a statement. North Koreas government has a record of forcing innocent American tourists into decades of hard labor and of beating and torturing them to the point of death. Their own people receive the same treatment, or worse, on a daily basis.

Dennis Rodmans complacency and coddling of Kim Jong-un romanticizes and makes light of how dangerous North Korea is to its own people and Americans who travel there. Removing Rodman from the Hall of Fame will send a message that all Americans are united against this regime.

Warmbier, who had been confined for 17 months, died Monday afternoon after reportedly being in a coma for a year. Officials in Washington and Pyongyang said Rodmans visit had nothing to do with Warmbier going home.

Save

Save

Read the rest here:
'Victims of Communism' Launch Petition to Have Dennis Rodman Removed from Hall of Fame - Eurweb.com

Why Socialism Is Back as a Political Force That Will Only Grow – Big Think

Socialism saw its heyday in the 20th century. As it was adapted by a number of countries, itwent through various bastardizations of its message andfaded into relative obscurity. Now it is experiencing a tremendous resurgence in the 21st century due to the growing economic disparity, anger at the establishment and charismatic older socialist politicians like Bernie Sanders in the U.S. and Jeremy Corbyn in the U.K. who gathered massive support from the young. A new wave of socialist thinkers is also beginning to emerge that looks to distance the movement from the historical stigma to formulate a new socialism that speaks to the challenges of today.

What is socialism? In the most basic definition, it is a political and economic system where the means of production and essential resources are owned by the community. Socialism comes in many different forms and has been practiced with great variety around the world.

Jacobin, a magazine thats gained popularity for offering socialist perspectives on political and cultural topics, published a guide on how to redefine socialism for the modern age. In it, the publications editor Bhaskar Sunkara describes socialism as, fundamentally, a way to build the kind of world where people dont take advantage of others for gain but rather for the benefits of cooperation. To Sunkara, socialism is abolishing private ownership of the things we all need and use factories, banks, offices, natural resources, utilities, communication and transportation infrastructure and replacing it with social ownership, thereby undercutting the power of elites to hoard wealth and power.

Private property would not exist, but personal property would remain. The government will not take away your Kenny Loggins records, jokes Sunkara.

An old Russian woman fixing her belongings on a vandalized symbols of the Communism, the Hammer and Sickle, on an avenue of Moscow, on November 1990. At the time of creation, the hammer stood for industrial labourers and the sickle for the peasantry; combined they stood for the worker-peasant alliance for socialism and against reactionary movements and foreign intervention. (Photo credit: ALEXANDER NEMENOV/AFP/Getty Images)

In their guide, the writers and editors of Jacobin also try to dispel some of the confusion related to socialism. In particular, they argue, many people tend to associate any kind of government institution, even the DMV, with socialism. But just because its a part of the government doesnt make it socialist. In fact, an average person has so little say politically due to the stronghold of corporate interests on the government,that any state action will disproportionately benefit capitalist interests at the expense of everything else, writes Chris Maisano in the Jacobins guide.

The journal also offers a defense against the charge that socialism inevitably ends up in authoritarian governments. Joseph M. Schwartz writes how Marxists and European socialists could not anticipate that revolutionary parties would try to create socialism in predominantly agrarian, autocratic societies like Russia and China.

In many ways, one-party Communist states shared more in common with past authoritarian capitalist developmentalist states such as late nineteenth-century Prussia and Japan, and postwar South Korea and Taiwan than with the vision of democratic socialism. These governments prioritized state-led industrialization over democratic rights, particularly those of an independent labor movement, writes Schwartz.

Jacobins prescription for building a more socialist country - mobilize the people through education and direct participation in the government.

Democratic presidential candidate Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) (C) addresses a rally with protesters calling for higher wages for federal contract workers in the rain on Capitol Hill November 10, 2015 in Washington, DC. (Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)

Is Bernie Sanders a socialist?He is the country's most popular active politician according to the polls, but he's not socialist enough, according to the editors of the Jacobin. Noam Chomsky famously called him a decent, honest New Dealer. Sanders himself draws the distinction, calling his politics - democratic socialism. He often refers to Scandinavian countries as models for what he would like the United States to become. Sanderss key themes of reducing economic inequality and the influence of politics in money appeals to a cross-section Americans from the left and the right.

To combat the negative stereotypes of socialism, Sanders invokes the New Deal policies of Franklin Delano Roosevelt that were called socialist like establishing social security and the minimum wage. Sanders also links the way he sees the world to Martin Luther Kings calls for social and economic justice.

To Sanders, education, affordable housing and universal health care are the publics right rather than private commodities that can be used to turn a profit. Still, he has not called for nationalizing any industries, saying specifically I dont believe government should own the means of production.

He defined democratic socialism himself in 2015 as a necessary adjustment in an increasingly unequal society.

Democratic socialism means that we must create an economy that works for all, not just the very wealthy. Democratic socialism means that we must reform a political system in America today which is not only grossly unfair but, in many respects, corrupt., said Sanders, adding In my view, its time we had democratic socialism for working families, not just Wall Street, billionaires and large corporations.

Jeremy Corbyn, Leader of the Labour Party speaks during a campaign rally at Union Chapel Islington on June 7, 2017 in London, United Kingdom. (Photo by Leon Neal/Getty Images)

Is Jeremy Corbyn a socialist? The leader of UKs Labour Party, which won a surprising number of seats against the ruling Conservative Party in recent elections,also identifies as a democratic socialist. Labours 2017 manifesto, titled For the Many, Not the Few includes plans to re-nationalize the rail, postal and water services, abolish college tuition fees, increase the minimum wage and spending on national healthcare, as well as upping the tax on the wealthy. Many of these ideas are certainly more to the left of what's been proposed by Sanders for the U.S.

Corbyns message has energized young voters in particular, with close to 70% of those 18 to 24 supporting Labour. How much more support can these kinds of ideas gain? The latest polls show the partys appeal growing wider still, now 5% ahead of the Tories at 46%. Corbyns personal approval is also high, better than the Prime Minister Theresa Mays.

To consider why the ideas of socialism continue to have followers in our times, lets turn to Albert Einstein. One of the worlds most brilliant thinkers who had seen the effects of socialism in his lifetime, Einstein wrote an essay called Why socialism in 1949 that still resonates in some of its themes.

German-born American physicist Albert Einstein (1879 - 1955) speaking during his Science And Civilization lecture at the Royal Albert Hall, London. (Photo by Keystone/Getty Images)

Einstein critiques capitalism as having a tendency towards becoming an oligarchy where private capital tends to become concentrated in few hands that cannot be effectively checked even by a democratically organized political society. This happens because the capitalists control the main mass media sources (including education) while the members of the government come from political parties that are largely financed or otherwise influenced by private capitalists who, for all practical purposes, separate the electorate from the legislature. As as a result of that, according to Einstein, these representatives do not sufficiently protect the interests of the underprivileged.

Sounds familiar? If similar challenges present themselves almost 70 years later, it is no surprise solutions like socialism come back. Of course, there are now also fears of fascism returning to fashion.

Einstein saw the establishment of a socialist economy with an accompanying educational system thats oriented towards social goals as the only way forward for society.

In such an economy, the means of production are owned by society itself and are utilized in a planned fashion. A planned economy, which adjusts production to the needs of the community, would distribute the work to be done among all those able to work and would guarantee a livelihood to every man, woman, and child. The education of the individual, in addition to promoting his own innate abilities, would attempt to develop in him a sense of responsibility for his fellow men in place of the glorification of power and success in our present society, wrote Einstein.

Einstein did caution, however, perhaps with an eye towards the Soviet Union, that a planned economy might result in the complete enslavement of the individual by the bureaucracy and saw it essential for socialism to resolve the problem of protecting the rights of the individual.

Historical lessons aside, socialism is a rejuvenated force. Polls show that somewhere between 30 to 60% of Democratic voters have a favorable view of its ideas. Over 50% of millennials have a positive opinion of socialism. As automation is sure to put a major portion of the world out of work, the issues around ownership of necessary resources and distribution of wealth are sure to stay vital.

Cover photo: A US-made 1957 Chevrolet Bel Air races past a billboard that reads,'Stronger than ever, Socialism' 14 February near Santa Maria del Mar, Cuba. (Photo credit: ADALBERTO ROQUE/AFP/Getty Images)

Go here to read the rest:
Why Socialism Is Back as a Political Force That Will Only Grow - Big Think

Is there a link between fitness and socialism? Personality quiz – The Guardian

Working out: is everyone equal if some are physically stronger than others? Photograph: Alamy

Whats the link between your exercise regime and how you feel society should be run? To find out, simply answer the following question on a six-point scale.

Approximately how much time per week do you spend lifting weights, in order to build muscle? (a) None (b) less than an hour (c) 1-2 hours (d) 2-3 hours (e) 3-4 hours (f) more than 4 hours.

If you scored 3 or more, then you spend more time than the average person building muscle mass (or, at least, the average person in a recent study conducted at Londons Brunel University). In terms of your views on society, you are more likely than the average person to endorse statements such as: Some groups of people are simply inferior to other groups, or: Its OK if some groups have more of a chance in life than others.

If you scored 2 or less, then you are less likely to endorse these statements, and also more likely to support the idea of redistribution of wealth; that the government should heavily tax the rich to support the poor.

So its fair to say bodybuilders are rarely socialists if so, why? The researchers interpret their findings in terms of what they call the social-bargaining model. Individuals who are physically stronger and therefore more likely to benefit from inequalities in both status and resources are less likely to support movements that seek to level the playing field. Its more likely to be survival of the fittest.

A fully referenced version of this article is at benambridge.com. Order Are You Smarter Than a Chimpanzee? by Ben Ambridge for 11.04 at bookshop.theguardian.com

Original post:
Is there a link between fitness and socialism? Personality quiz - The Guardian