Archive for May, 2017

We need deal with the EU to combat terror, experts tell Theresa May – The Guardian

As armed police step up their patrols at home, there were warnings that the Manchester bomber may have links to terror cells in Europe. Photograph: Hannah McKay/Reuters

The UKs full participation in European Union security and intelligence co-operation will be critical to the fight against terrorism after Brexit, leading British security experts have said, as Theresa May announced wide-ranging new plans to counter extremism.

The growing demands for the prime minister to face down anti-EU forces in the Tory party and make membership of bodies such as Europol, the EUs criminal intelligence agency, a top priority, came amid fears that Brexit could leave the UK with inferior access to key European databases and deprive British police forces of vital tools in high-level, pan-European anti-terror probes.

The calls from senior figures including Sir Hugh Orde, former chief constable of the police service of Northern Ireland and former head of Europol Max-Peter Ratzel were reinforced on Saturday night by Dominic Grieve, the Tory chair of the Commons intelligence and security committee.

Grieve said full participation, even if it meant accepting EU rules and judicial oversight for the European Court of Justice (ECJ), could not be more crucial. He said he believed May was committed to remaining closely involved in EU security but believed that doing so would require compromise that would be hard for some in Mays party to accept.

Although our partnership with the US for intelligence sharing is extremely important, the fact is that the current terrorist threat is very much a European dimension issue. The Schengen database and knowing about who has moved where are all intimately dependent on European systems and we have got to try to remain in them, he said.

I think it is going to be very difficult, and the government and Parliament will have to face up to the fact that it might turn out during the Brexit negotiation that some sort of mechanism for the European court is going to be necessary, he added.

After the Manchester attack, which killed 22 people and left dozens of others grievously injured, it was revealed that suicide bomber Salman Abedi had travelled back to England from Libya via Turkey and Dusseldorf four days before the attack.

The bomb contained the same kind of explosives as those used in the Paris and Brussels attacks in 2015 and 2016, prompting speculation that Abedi was linked to terror cells on the European mainland. UK counter-terrorism officials investigating the Abedi network are working with Europol, with separate bilateral inquiries ongoing with German and Belgian intelligence agencies.

Orde told the Observer that UK membership of EU bodies such as Europol and Eurojust, which brokers judicial co-operation in criminal cases, not only allowed access to huge amounts of vital data, but also meant UK police could set up joint inquiries with German police or those from other national forces without delay.

European arrest warrants were also essential, he said: If we dont have all this, it makes it a lot more difficult to do this crucial work. It it vital that we get to a situation as close to what we have as members of the EU as possible, though it is difficult to see how we do that. As members of Europol and Eurojust, states are subject to EU rules on data transfers and procedures and ECJ jurisdiction in any disputes or appeals over use of tools such as arrest warrants.

Ratzel, who led the pan-EU crime-fighting agency until 2009, warned that Britain must accept some of the rulings of the ECJ as part of any deal something May has previously ruled out. My expectation is that once you have an important role to play, you have to be under the European Court of Justice. Cherry picking cannot work. You have to obey the rules of the club. I am personally sure that the Europeans will never accept Britain having a role in Europol without being under the rule of the European Court of Justice.

As anti-terror policies of the rival parties were placed centre stage in the election campaign, May declared on Saturday night that more needed to be done.

She added: We need to be stronger and more resolute in standing up to these people. Spelling out details of a new commission for countering extremism, announced in the Tory manifesto, she said government had to widen its role and approach.

There is clearly a role for government in tackling extremism where it involves behaviour that is or ought to be criminal. But there is also a role for government to help people and build up organisations in society to promote and defend Britains pluralistic values, and stand up to the extremists.

Mays initiative came as Labour also attempts to boost its security credentials by pledging to appoint 1,000 more intelligence staff. Jeremy Corbyn has already said he would appoint an extra 10,000 police, 3,000 firefighters and 3,000 prison officers. Suggesting that public spending cuts had put people in danger, Corbyn said that ensuring the safety of communities demands properly resourced action across many fronts.

It means upholding and enforcing our individual rights, promoting community relations, supporting our emergency services, tackling and preventing crime and protecting us from danger, including threats of terror and violence, he said.

The Manchester bombing was the worst terror attack to hit Britain since the 7 July attacks in London in 2005.

A street in Manchesters Moss Side was evacuated by counter-terrorism officers and controlled explosives were used in a raid on a property in Cheetham Hill.

Two men aged 20 and 22 were arrested in the early hours of Saturday morning at the Cheetham Hill address, police said. Neighbours identified Yahya and Mohamed Werfalli as two of the occupants of the raided house. They were said to be of Libyan descent and part of the same friendship groups as the Manchester bomber.

See the rest here:
We need deal with the EU to combat terror, experts tell Theresa May - The Guardian

Trump visits European Union headquarters; EU leaders cite some differences – Los Angeles Times

Donald Tusk, the president of the European Council, said Thursday that differences remain between the Trump administration and the European Union on Russia, energy and trade.

I am not 100 percent sure that we can say today that we have a common opinion about Russia, Tusk, a former Polish prime minister who is sometimes called "the other Donald," said after a meeting with President Trump at EU headquarters.

Tuskadded that while some issues "remain open, like climate and trade," the leaders agreed first and foremost on the need to combat terrorism.

EU officialswere skeptical in advance of Trump's visit. Their concernswere driven in part by the U.S. leaders positive stance on Britain's vote last year to leave the bloc. Trump at the time called it a great idea.

However, he has since spoken of theimportance of European unity.

European officials are also concerned that the Trump administrationmight withdraw from the 2015 Paris climate agreement to limit global warming, and turn away from trade arrangements with the EU.

Trumps visit to Brussels marked the fourth leg of his first overseas trip. Before heading into the talks with Tusk and European Commission PresidentJean-Claude Juncker, he spoke enthusiastically about his earlier stops in Saudi Arabia and at the Vatican.

His ceremonial welcome last week in the Saudi capital of Riyadh, Trump told the European officials, was beyond anything anyones seen. The Saudis staged elaborate festivities including a traditional sword dance.

And the president called his private encounter with Pope Francis on Wednesday very impressive. The president and the pontiff met privately for half an hour, and Francis presented Trump with gifts including a copy of a papal encyclical on climate change.

The pope was terrific, Trump said.

After the visit to the EUs sprawling new headquarters, Trump headed to a luncheon with the newly elected French president, Emmanuel Macron. The two men were meeting for the first time.

During the French presidential campaign, Trump had praised Macrons far-right opponent Marine Le Pen for her tough positions on immigration and borders, but he had stopped short of endorsing her.

See the original post here:
Trump visits European Union headquarters; EU leaders cite some differences - Los Angeles Times

Trump calls Germans ‘bad’ but agrees EU trade plan – EUobserver

Brussels, 26. May, 09:14

US president Donald Trump reportedly called Germans bad, very bad because of the US' trade deficit with Germany. His comments came even as the European Commission had said that the EU and US would work on a common trade plan.

The Germans are bad, very bad, Trump reportedly said during his meeting in Brussels with European Council president Donald Tusk and European Commission president Jean-Claude Juncker, according to German weekly Der Spiegel.

Subscribe now for unrestricted access to EUobserver.

Sign up for 30 days' free trial, no obligation. Full subscription only 15 / month or 150 / year.

EUobserver is the only independent news media covering EU affairs in Brussels and all 28 member states.

We value your support.

If you already have an account click here to login.

Look at the millions of cars they sell in the US. Terrible! We'll stop that, the US president added.

Last year, the US had a goods trade deficit with Germany of about 58 billion.

Juncker then intervened to say free trade benefits the US as well, according to Der Spiegel's source.

Since the failure of talks on TTIP, the EU-US free trade agreement, and in the face of the Trump administration's calls for more protectionism, the EU has been stressing the US' interests in good trading relations.

In February, the EU commission chief had already told US vice president Mike Pence that "the US economy is depending more than some in the US think on the exchanges, the trade volumes ... between the US and the European Union."

"Including Indiana, by the way," he added, referring to Pence's own state where he had been governor between 2013 and 2017.

According to EU sources, Trump also said the US was concerned that Brexit would destroy jobs in the US.

Trump's reported comments emerged as EU sources said that EU and US leaders agreed to set up a "working group" or "joint action plan" on trade.

Few details about the initiative are known, since both sides will have to form their delegations and define the scope of the talks.

Various EU sources said that the joint group would work on "difficult" bilateral issues, as well as on "global" issues, but suggested that a revival of TTIP talks may not be included.

The White House said in a statement, after the meeting, that the US and the EU "should deepen [their] strong economic relationship and that leaders "discussed the need to protect American and European industries against unfair competition".

After Thursday's meeting, Tusk mentioned trade as one of the issues [that] remain open.

Visit link:
Trump calls Germans 'bad' but agrees EU trade plan - EUobserver

The Soviet War in Afghanistan, 1979 – 1989 – The Atlantic

Nearly twenty-five years ago, the Soviet Union pulled its last troops out of Afghanistan, ending more than nine years of direct involvement and occupation. The USSR entered neighboring Afghanistan in 1979, attempting to shore up the newly-established pro-Soviet regime in Kabul. In short order, nearly 100,000 Soviet soldiers took control of major cities and highways. Rebellion was swift and broad, and the Soviets dealt harshly with the Mujahideen rebels and those who supported them, leveling entire villages to deny safe havens to their enemy. Foreign support propped up the diverse group of rebels, pouring in from Iran, Pakistan, China, and the United States. In the brutal nine-year conflict, an estimated one million civilians were killed, as well as 90,000 Mujahideen fighters, 18,000 Afghan troops, and 14,500 Soviet soldiers. Civil war raged after the withdrawal, setting the stage for the Taliban's takeover of the country in 1996. As NATO troops move toward their final withdrawal this year, Afghans worry about what will come next, and Russian involvement in neighboring Ukraine's rebellion has the world's attention, it is worth looking back at the Soviet-Afghan conflict that ended a quarter-century ago. Today's entry is part of the ongoing series here on Afghanistan.

Read the original:
The Soviet War in Afghanistan, 1979 - 1989 - The Atlantic

Meet the Nerds Coding Their Way Through the Afghanistan War – WIRED

Slide: 1 / of 3. Caption: Caption: Defense Digital Service Team members from left, Hunter Pitelka, Brandon Bouier, Eduardo Ortiz, Chris Lynch, Erin Delaney and Nick at the Pentagon.Jared Soares for WIRED

Slide: 2 / of 3. Caption: Caption: Erin Delaney.Jared Soares for WIRED

Slide: 3 / of 3. Caption: Caption: Nick Small. Digital Defense Service

A disembodied voice sounded over a loudspeaker. Incoming. Take cover, it warned to anyone within earshot. Then, the sirens began to wail.

Erin Delaney assumed it was a drill. She peeked down the hallway to see how other people were responding. Then she hit the deck. It was not a drill. The NATO base in Kabul where Delaney had been working for weeks was being attacked.

Delaney, 24, had never had any military training. She grew up in San Diego, traveled up the coast for college at UC Berkeley, and spent the next two years nestled in the safe, Tesla-filled San Francisco bubble, working in the compliance department at Dropbox. Now, with her nose to the ground, she was getting a tastehowever briefof life in a war zone.

She flipped over the visitors badge shed received when she first arrived at the base. In case of attack, it said, she should stay on the ground for two minutes. Assuming nothing dire happened, she was to shelter in place until the shelling stopped. So, for about an hour, thats what she did. Then when things were normal, we went back to work, Delaney says with a shrug. And that was that.

Delaney is part of a 27-person unit that comprises the Defense Digital Service, a sort of tech SWAT team within the Department of Defense. Engineers and data experts from across the country leave their jobs at companies like Netflix, IDEO, Palantir, and, yes, Dropbox and join DDS for tours of duty that typically last about two years. They spend that time revamping and often completely reinventing the tools and practices that lag far behind private sector standards, as the Pentagon itself puts it. This past winter, that work brought the team to Kabul, where NATO troops have spent years advising Afghans on how to make their country self-sustaining.

Founded in 2015, the DDS is the Defense Departments spinoff of the United States Digital Service, an Obama-era program established at the White House. So far, the Trump administration appears inclined to keep the group in place. The Defense Department must move at the speed of relevancy, Defense Secretary James Mattis told WIRED in a statement. The Defense Digital Service team plays a critical role in meeting that commitment.

The Afghanistan project demonstrates why. It turns out that dispatching just a few private-sector experts to the battlefield can make life a little easier for personnel on the ground. To be sure, the situation in Afghanistan is messier than ever. But now at least some of the software driving the mission isnt.

If Kabul was like an alien planet to Delaney, the DDS office looks a lot like home, Silicon Valley-style. Situated deep inside the Pentagon, the whiteboard-covered walls pop with multicolored flowcharts and checklists full of projects the DDS team has completed over the past two years. There in teal marker are the words Hack the Pentagon, a bug-bounty program aimed at finding vulnerabilities in Defense Department websites. Below it in blue, theres Data.mil, an experiment in opening up DoD data to the public.

Star Wars embellishments abound. The tiny conference room is called Yoda, and the front door of the office bears a placard that reads Rebel Alliance. It all but announces to the beribboned generals and suit-wearing bureaucrats passing by that yes, this is where the nerds work, and they may not be entirely under your control.

Thats Chris Lynchs doing. As director of DDS, he views it as his duty to shake up the Pentagon, and hes not trying to fit in. We trigger a lot of antibodies, says Lynch, who may be the only person in the buildings nearly 4 million square feet of office space wearing a stormtrooper T-shirt and sneakers to work.

Before becoming head of the group, the 41-year-old entrepreneur started three tech companies, where he enjoyed the autonomy that comes with being the boss. Inside the DoD, the first answer to almost everything he proposes is no. Even when the DDS team manages to untangle one bureaucratic knot, they often find miles more red tape underneath it. For the rank and file in the military, the relief is fleeting. Its like a cold glass of water in hell, Lynch says.

Even so, Lynch clearly relishes the challenge. He may also be the only person in the building who gets choked up talking about the Defense Departments arcane technology procurement process. Hes seen firsthand how poorly conceived tech tools, designed around some conference table in DC without input from users, can impact life and death decisions for members of the military.

Take Lynchs first project at DDS, which focused on the system that keeps track of service members active duty records. Those documentscritical to providing proper medical services to veteranswould often go missing on their way from the DoD to the Veterans Affairs office. Finding them could sometimes take yearsyears that many veterans with serious conditions dont have.

The problem, Lynch soon learned, stemmed from an almost comical glitch at Veterans Affairs: The agency only accepted PDF documents. If paperwork was filed as a JPEG, it was rejected, or simply disappeared. So DDS built a suite of simple file converters to standardize the process. Its not the type of fix Lynch considers particularly innovative or magic. I dont consider it anything other than something that should make you so angry that you say, I can do better than that, he says. Its fucking wrong.

When he signed on, Lynch only planned to stay at DDS for 45 days, but fixing the VAs document problem hooked him. This is the worst job Ive ever had, he says. But if youre lucky, and you do what you came to do, youll get a win that will be unlike anything else you could ever do in your life.

That passion has helped the DDS team weather one of the most tumultuous White House transitions in recent history. The election result shocked the young, largely liberal staff, but not a single member of the team left because of it. That doesnt mean theyve stayed quiet about their new boss. Eduardo Ortiz, a designer on the Afghanistan project and a former Marine, tattooed the word RESIST in giant block letters on his right forearm shortly after the election and now wears his hoodie sleeve slightly rolled up to ensure that the world can see.

Still, most members of the team say Trumps election hasnt had much impact on their day jobs. A lot of my friends asked, Are you going to stick around, now that you work for the Trump administration? former engineer Hunter Pitelka says, raising his lanky arms over his head boogeyman-style. His answer? A hard yes. Whether or not you believe there should be a war in Afghanistan, whether or not you believe President Trump should be doing the things he does, there are US soldiers in Iraq, Afghanistan, and all over the world who are making decisions every day, and I want them to have the best possible information to make those decisions. he says. Nobody wants us to make bad decisions.

Pitelka, 27, is the reason the team went to Afghanistan. Before joining the Pentagon, the bespectacled beanpole had worked at Palantir, the secretive data science company that has big contracts with the DoD. During that time, he did a two-month tour on a Marine aircraft carrier in the Pacific Ocean, where he too saw how antiquated military technology can be. The technology were giving our service members is shit, says Pitelka, who shares Lynchs affinity for four-letter words. It boils my blood to think about it.

Pitelka asked whether his boss might consider sending the DDS team to theater, military talk for the battlefield. Until then, DDS had focused on tools that would make the Pentagon more efficient. But Pitelka says that often by the time Washington hears of a technological obstacle in Afghanistan, its been on fire for a long time already. So, last summer, with former defense secretary Ashton Carters encouragement, the DDS team decided they would go to Afghanistan to find some fires to extinguish.

At the time, Matt Cutts was two weeks away from joining the DDS team. The 45-year-old former Googler, best known as the grandfather of the search engines spam fighting efforts, was still hunting for an apartment in DC when he got a call from Lynch: Would he be able to start working a week earlyand would he consider starting in Afghanistan? I was like, Let me just say that out loud so my wife can hear it, Cutts remembers. She gave him the thumbs up, and within a week, he, Lynch, Pitelka, and a few other members of the team were strapped into a Blackhawk helicopter, flack jackets on, heading to Kabul.

Mortar attacks aside, life on the base was relatively luxurious, with tree-lined roads and an onsite boutique froyo shop called Ministry of Yogurt. The DDS team slept in souped-up shipping containers the size of some New York City studio apartments, with their own bathrooms. They worked 12- to 16-hour days, and in their spare time theyd unwind with one of a handful of 90s DVDs. (Total Recall and My Cousin Vinny were favorites.) Of course, there were some quirks to life on the base: the strict instructions not to peek their heads over the perimeters walls (Lynch did it anyway), the weaponry strapped to every soldier in the mess hall, the Mongolian troops racing one another to assemble machine guns, blindfolded, outside their yurt.

But while the accommodations exceeded the teams expectations, technologically speaking the place was a giant tire fire, says Nick Small, an engineer on the project. There was the piece of training software that only came in English, even though it was for Afghan officials who almost exclusively spoke Dari or Pashto. Army computer filters prevented a public affairs officer from clicking links on Twitter, even though his job was to teach Afghan government officials how to use social media. As a workaround, hed write down URLs on a piece of paper, walk to a desk with an unfiltered, so-called dirtynet computer, and enter it there. It was unbelievable, Pitelka recalls, clapping both hands to his cheeks as he often does when explaining technological atrocities.

But it wasnt until an Army colonel shuttled them over to his computer to show them a tool called ANET that the team found a project they believed could impact thousands of people. NATO advisers use ANET to track their progress guiding Afghans through the endlessly complex process of standing up a modern government. The advisers, who started arriving in January 2015, spend their days teaching their Afghan counterparts skills like training and recruiting police, budgeting, fostering transparency. They use ANET to keep track of every conversation and step forward. Logging information into the system is a way to retain institutional knowledge as advisers cycle in and out of the country.

Which sounds great in theory. But until recently, ANET hardly worked. Reports that should have taken minutes to write often took hours. Youve never seen a user interface that looked so early Netscape Navigator, Lynch says. A banner at the top of the home screen read Welcome to ANET. Below that no fewer than 20 icons and a series of old-fashioned clip art images cluttered the page. Searches in the program were, inexplicably, set to not results, meaning that if you searched for the word corruption, ANET would produce all the past reports that did not include the term. But it wouldnt have mattered much, because the search results werent clickable.

Advisers underwent hours-long training sessions in how to use the program. If you could stay awake for it, you kind of had a very rudimentary working knowledge of the system when you walked away, says Lt. Col. Dartagnan Deanda, an adviser with the US Air Force, who goes by Dart.

Compiling reports on ANET took hours out of Deandas day. Youd click the button, go get a soda and come back and hope your page had loaded, he explains. Managing the quirks and failures of this software became one giant, distracting obligation for a group of people whose core jobrebuilding Afghanistanshould have had very little to do with software.

It was, in other words, a perfect DDS target. It took the team a week to settle on ANET as a target; getting permission from the DoD and NATO to move fast and break the very thing that thousands of advisers in Afghanistan became a months-long struggle. I dont want to characterize it as resistance, but people were uncomfortable with the speed at which DDS worked, says Col. David Meyer, who directs the Armys Security Forces Assistance Center, which oversees advising efforts.

Delaney joined the team specifically to be a bureaucracy hacker, working with Meyer to knock down roadblocks thrown in the engineers paths, like the time NATO officials told them JavaScript was banned from NATO software. That turned out to be untrue, but it took a tricontinental goose chase to figure that out. Delaney became adept at the art of what the DDS team calls choke con, the principle that getting anyone in government to do anything requires you to be physically close enough to choke them.

Among the military personnel, there was also some healthy skepticism that this team of young nerdsmany of them the age of the advisers childrenwould keep their promises. In the military we get pitched often, and people say, Youll get new kits and new things, and then you wait three years to get Army hand-downs, says Ortiz, the tattooed former Marine and designer for the US Digital Service, who lent a hand on ANET.

But the DDS team kept coming back, making four trips to Afghanistan in all, and relished the chance to show off new features to the dubious troops. By January, they had got the beta test of the new ANET up and running. It was pretty humdrum by Silicon Valley standardsnot exactly the kind of software that would wow investors at a Y Combinator demo day. The team merely created a streamlined, functional website where advisers could create reports in a matter of minutes and search for reports in a matter of seconds. It did the basics, like remembering a users prior searches and suggesting the names of their Afghan counterparts. We did autosave, Delaney says, laughing. That blew peoples minds.

Finally, at the end of the January trip, it was time for Lt. General Jrgen Weigt, the NATO missions chief of staff, to either green light the project or scrap it altogether. On the day they were set to leave Afghanistan, Delaney, Pitelka, and other members of the team gathered around a table with Weigt and a few of his assistants. Delaney launched into the demo, showing off the speed of the new search function compared to the old one. As soon as she finished, the room fell silent.

Then Weigt spoke up. He just asked us, What do you guys need from us? Delaney says, before Pitelka corrects her: I think the specific quote from the assistant to the chief of staff was Whose ass do I need to put my boot up?

The battle to revamp ANET might not make it into the annals of military history. But it has all the plot points: It brought together a scrappy band of military neophytes who deployed to a war zone, traversed mountains of red tape, and finally planted their flag of intuitive tech on the front lines. Unlike the service men and women who remain mired in what seems like a never-ending war in Afghanistan, though, the tech troops actually got to pack up their MacBooks and head home.

With the new ANET up and running, Pitelka and Delaney took off from Afghanistan for the last time in March, leaving the tool in the hands of NATO coders. In a few months, theyll leave the Defense Digital Service, too. Thats by design. Lynch warns his team that they will stagnate if they spend too long within the Pentagons walls. Two years in, Pitelka is already starting to speak in acronyms. (The SFAC is the owner of the mission-wide POAMs. Sure.)

Theres a certain kind of anxiety that comes with moving on. In 10 years everybody heres going to be gone. This team might be a giant evil bureaucratic nightmare, Pitelka says. And of course, theyre leaving DDS in the hands of an administration that Pitelka says most people in this office are probably not super excited about. But he argues that this is even more reason why his fellow technologistseven the liberal onesshould come work for the government. I feel like you kind of want to be at the table, he says.

The members of the military who worked with the DDS team found that kind of idealism infectious and inspiring. They could all be making a heck of a lot more money in places infinitely nicer to be than Afghanistan, Col. Meyer says of the crew. Its kind of a trite saying, but, frankly, theres a lot of patriotism in that.

One casualty of the DDS teams Afghanistan deployment was the Silicon Valley article of faith that technology alone can solve all the problems of the world. They know that sophisticated software wont get international troops out of the quagmire that is Afghanistan anytime soon. They also knownow, better than mostthat lousy software certainly wont help.

The rest is here:
Meet the Nerds Coding Their Way Through the Afghanistan War - WIRED