Archive for May, 2017

In South Carolina special election, Democrats try for another GOP House seat – Washington Post

REMBERT, S.C. Archie Parnell arrived at the Black Cowboy Festival with an impossible mission talking politics to people who had paid $20 apiece to eat barbecue and watch horses gallop around a track. He was the local Democratic nominee for Congress, but hed never run for office before, and shaking hands did not come naturally.

Im running for Congress, Parnell said to a polite but quiet couple sitting down to split a fried turkey leg. Id be grateful if you consider me.

He shook more hands; he started and halted conversations as a loudspeaker blared the name of the next horses and riders. But after he found a rhythm, he won the vote for Reneth Jones, 59, by talking about the Republicans plan to gut the Affordable Care Act.

Man, when you take that away, people are going to suffer, Jones said.

We dont see any compassion in what they do, Parnell said. It was a close vote. If you send me to Washington, Ill be a vote against that bill.

Parnell, a 66-year old tax attorney, had been a candidate for South Carolinas 5th Congressional District for just two months. The seat had opened when Mick Mulvaney joined President Trumps administration, and Democrats, bullish on races in Georgia and Montana, had said almost nothing about it. Georgias Jon Ossoff had raised more than $10 million for his June 20 runoff; Parnell, whose election is the very same day, had raised less than one-hundreth as much.

In the wake of the Houses health-care vote, Parnell and South Carolinas beleaguered Democrats are trying to make Republicans sweat in a district that isnt making it easy: one drawn to elect a Republican, and with a substantial black population that Democrats struggle to turn out.

While Democrats grow bullish on how a suburban resistance can roll back Republicans, Parnell is testing whether black voters can be turned out with a warning that a Republican-dominated Congress is threatening the way they live.

[Klobuchar, others start making 2020 moves and the base starts making demands]

But with no air cover from national Democrats, Parnell tried to turn his scrappiness into an advantage. A former congressional staff member who went on to work for Goldman Sachs, he quickly tells people that he had never sought office until the 2016 election got him thinking and until his hometown mayor told him he would be a good candidate. He showed up to the Black Cowboy Festival wearing a sweater vest; in campaign material, he is pitched not as a partisan Democrat, but as a tax expert who wants to fix the ACA and broaden the base for tax reform. His most-aired ad mocks his very ordinariness, showing him striding toward the camera in slow motion before he finally tells the narrator to knock it off.

Hes the one man wholl solve all your problems, and bring Clemson and Carolina fans together, the narrator says.

Wait, what? Parnell says. Politicians promise and then dont deliver.

Republicans are skeptical, verging on cocky. Last week, they caught their first bad break in the district when their primary ended in a near-tie between Tommy Pope and Ralph Norman, two conservative state legislators. (Norman sought and lost the 5th District 11 years ago.) That kicked off a two-week runoff, forcing the candidates to spend money and keeping the state party neutral until it has a nominee.

Archie Parnells a nice guy, and hes got two weeks of being ignored, said Matt Moore, the outgoing chairman of the South Carolina GOP. But hes going to have a problem getting Democrats mobilized, while Republicans are excited that the House is keeping its promises. I dont expect us to pull the fire alarm.

But South Carolina Democrats like to point to Kansas, where a Democrat lost by 7.2 points in a district the last Republican congressman had won by 31.1 points. A swing that size in South Carolina would elect Parnell.

Pope and Norman, whose campaigns did not respond to repeated questions from The Washington Post, have made no statements whatsoever about the Republicans American Health Care Act. In their ads, both candidates pledge to repeal Obamacare, and in one spot Pope even invokes the image of the 44th president to say theres no justice in Washington.

The upshot is that both GOP campaigns believe that the 5th District is ripe for whoever wins their primary. Mulvaney, in 2010, was the first Republican ever to win the district, which stretches from the suburbs of Charlotte to the exurbs of Columbia. In 2012, it rejected Barack Obamas reelection by 12.5 points; in 2016, it voted for Donald Trump by 18.5 points.

Parnells theory of victory takes that into consideration, and asks what could be done to change the electorate. One reason that 2012 gave the Democrats a closer race was that 28.1 percent of the districts residents, and a smaller percentage of its voters, are black. South Carolina Democrats, without overselling their chances, are universal on one point: if Parnell can make the electorate resemble 2012, using health care as an issue, he is in the hunt.

Itll take a campaign that concentrates on voter turnout, rather than TV advertising, which is what previous candidates have tried and failed, said Rep. James E. Clyburn (D-S.C.), the sole Democrat in the states delegation.

Some of the Republicans Obama-era gains have come when nonwhite voters sat at home. In polling by Priorities USA, a pro-Democratic super PAC, black voters who did not usually vote in midterms remained less likely to express interest in voting next year than angry white liberal voters. According to a new analysis of the 2016 election turnout, the two states that broke most dramatically away from Hillary Clinton Wisconsin and Michigan saw a double-digit decline in black votes.

South Carolina Democrats have responded by telling black voters that they are facing new and direct threats. In a radio spot that helped Parnell win the nomination over two little-funded black candidates Columbias black Democratic mayor beseeched voters to send Trump a message. Donald Trump asked us, What did we have to lose? Mayor Stephen K. Benjamin asks in the ad. Now we know the answer.

This past weekend, as he stumped across black neighborhoods, Parnell did not get many questions about tax policy. He was not challenged on his Goldman Sachs rsum something Republicans plan to attack to alienate him from liberals. (Parnell plans to rebut them by saying he was not a banker, but a policeman for tax compliance.)

Instead, he was egged on to fight Trump. At several homes near his Rock Hill campaign office, he was stopped and invited in so that voters could rant about the president. One retiree rifled around in his pocket for $5, so he could start a fund to send Trump to Russia.

On Sunday morning, Parnell was invited to Faith, Hope & Victory Christian Church in Lancaster, shaking hands on the way in before taking a seat in the first pew. In the old days, Id have sat over there, he said, pointing at the back of the room. Im really an introvert.

Halfway through the sermon, between the hymns and an interpretive dance, Parnell introduced himself to the dozens of rapt voters (and phone-checking teenagers) who came every Sunday.

Can you imagine an America without Social Security? Parnell asked. It would be a very different place, a place I dont want to live in.

The congregation was polite, but unmoved. Parnell picked up a fan he had been given, covered in pictures of the first black president.

Can you imagine the world that wed be living in without Barack Obama? he asked. Softly, one congregant said health care and Parnell had his cue.

Im glad you mentioned that, he said. Actually, this past week, the House voted to repeal Obamacare. If I were there, at that time, I would vote against that repeal. One or two votes make all the difference in the world.

Read more at PowerPost

Link:
In South Carolina special election, Democrats try for another GOP House seat - Washington Post

Democrats take on Trump over court vacancies – Politico

With his nomination Monday of 10 conservative judges to the federal courts, President Donald Trump is reviving the long-running judicial wars with Democrats. And the two picks likely to rankle Democrats the most are the ones they have the most leverage to block.

Senate Democrats have few powers to prevent judges from getting confirmed to their lifetime appointments, due to rules changes they pushed through in 2013 that eliminated the 60-vote threshold for nearly all nominations. But Democratic senators can wage a silent filibuster of sorts against nominees from their home states through the so-called blue-slip process.

Story Continued Below

Two of the 10 judicial nominees the White House unveiled on Monday were on Trumps short list of potential Supreme Court justices during the campaign: Michigan Supreme Court Justice Joan Larsen, who will be nominated to the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, and Justice David Stras, who sits on the Minnesota Supreme Court and is Trumps pick for the 8th Circuit.

Minnesota and Michigan are each represented by two Democratic senators. That gives Amy Klobuchar and Al Franken, who hail from Minnesota, and Debbie Stabenow and Gary Peters of Michigan, what amounts to veto authority over the nominees, who are already drawing objections from other Democrats.

We know that there is a prized list now from [conservative] special interest groups and one of them is now on the Supreme Court, Illinois Sen. Dick Durbin, the second-ranking Senate Democrat, said Monday, referring to recently-confirmed Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch. If thats the way the president is going to choose the leaders of the judiciary, we need to ask some probing questions about why these special interest groups believe these particular judges are the best choices.

Of the blue-slip powers, Durbin added: As long as we have the authority, well use it if necessary.

In a statement, Franken said he was concerned Stras nomination was "the product of a process that relied heavily on guidance from far-right Washington, D.C.-based special interest groups rather than through a committee made up of a cross section of Minnesotas legal community." Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) accused Trump of continuing to outsource the judicial selection process to hard-right special interest groups rather than consulting with senators. Democrats have long been critical that Trump's Supreme Court short list was crafted with input from the conservative Heritage Foundation and Federalist Society.

A spokesman for Franken said the senator was not meaningfully consulted and that the White House declined the Franken's recommendations to fill the vacancy at the St. Louis-based appeals court. A separate Senate Democratic aide said the Trump administration notified, rather than consulted, the senators, declining to ask for input before announcing the nominee.

Lack of consultation on judicial nominees goes against traditional White House practice, said veterans of the nomination process.

In the Obama administration, people would not return their blue slips simply because they felt they werent consulted efficiently, said Christopher Kang, who served as deputy counsel to former President Barack Obama.

Kang, now the national director at the National Council of Asian Pacific Americans, said 17 judicial nominees during Obamas tenure were blocked because home-state senators declined to give approval, or return their blue slips to the Judiciary Committee.

Battles over judicial nominations are often caustic. But tensions have been especially high following the contentious battle to get Gorsuch installed at the Supreme Court and Trumps frequent attacks on the judiciary, particularly after judges produce rulings against his executive orders.

Mondays announcement of Trumps 10 conservative nominees came the same day that the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals considered the legality of Trumps revised travel ban.

Democrats will retain the blue-slip leverage, at least for now. A broad swath of Senate Republicans is opposed to doing away with the tradition, even as GOP senators blew up the old filibuster rules for Supreme Court nominees while they shepherded Gorsuch through to confirmation earlier this year.

Some prominent conservatives, such as radio host Hugh Hewitt, are urging Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) to ignore the century-old blue slip tradition. But Grassley said he plans to abide by it.

In addition to Grassley, more than a half-dozen other Republicans on the judiciary panel said in interviews that they have no plans to ditch blue slips. That's the case even though doing so would allow Trump to more easily install conservative judges, particularly in states with two Democratic senators.

Thats been the traditions of the Senate, that home-state senators have a say, said Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), a senior member of the committee. Im not about to give up my rights as a senator to have a say about district court judges wholl represent my constituents long after the presidents gone.

Senate Majority Whip John Cornyn, who has 11 district court vacancies in his home state of Texas, along with two empty appellate court seats, called the blue slip an equal opportunity irritant.

When its an impediment, then people dont like it. When its helpful, people like it, Cornyn said. What it does [is], it provokes a negotiation, which I dont think is an altogether bad thing.

Sign up for POLITICO Huddle. A daily play-by-play of congressional news in your inbox.

By signing up you agree to receive email newsletters or alerts from POLITICO. You can unsubscribe at any time.

Sens. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.), Mike Crapo (R-Idaho), John Kennedy (R-La.) and Jeff Flake (R-Ariz.) offered a similar defense of the practice.

We used it effectively myself with Sen. [John] McCain to negotiate with the Obama administration on judges, Flake said. I like that tradition.

Trump inherited a significantly higher number of lower-court vacancies than his two immediate predecessors, handing him a significant opportunity to reshape the federal judiciary for generations. Obama faced about 50 lower court vacancies, while President George W. Bush inherited about 80 open judgeships.

For that, Trump largely has Mitch McConnell to thank. During the Kentucky Republicans first two years as majority leader, only 20 district and circuit court judges were confirmed by the Senate, marking the slowest pace of judicial confirmations by the chamber in more than six decades.

Before Monday, Trump had nominated just one candidate for the 129 vacancies currently hampering the federal judiciary: Amul Thapar to the 6th Circuit Court of Appeals, a sitting federal judge who coasted through his 90-minute confirmation hearing in late April.

Even with the announcement of the new nominees, other Republicans are eager for the Trump White House to send more candidates for the judiciary, particularly for vacancies in their home states.

Were concerned, said Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-Utah), a senior member of the Judiciary Committee. There is one judicial vacancy in Utah, which has been open since 2014. Weve already made our suggestions. They know that were interested in getting that taken care of.

Missing out on the latest scoops? Sign up for POLITICO Playbook and get the latest news, every morning in your inbox.

More here:
Democrats take on Trump over court vacancies - Politico

The Democrats aren’t being honest about health care – Washington Post (blog)

House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) and House Minority Whip Steny H. Hoyer (D-Md.) on May 4 scolded House Republicans for passing a health-care bill aiming to revise the Affordable Care Act. (Reuters)

The Democrats and their allies in the media want you to believe two conflicting certainties about the recently passed House Republican health-care bill. First, they want you to think that this bill doesnt amount to anything that its not a victory for Trump, will never become law, and has been completely disregarded by the Senate. Second, they want you to think that Republicans repeal-and-replace bill is a catastrophic development for the GOP and the nation that it will cost Republicans their majority, is certainly political suicide for the party as a whole, and is already adversely affecting the health of many Americans. But the health-care bill simply cannot amount to nothing on the one hand and deal a fatal blow to the entire Republican Party and be a plague on the population on the other.

In listening toHouse and Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) and SenateMinority Leader Charles E. Schumer (D-N.Y.), one is led to believe that the pain and suffering caused by the Republican health-care bill will be unbearable, that widows and orphans will be dropping like flies. Even former president Barack Obama took a break from his jet-setting, yacht-sailing life to prevailupon Congress the need to exercise political courage in not repealing Obamacare. The Democrats comments are just partisan spin meant to distract from the real story that liberals beloved Obamacare is falling apart.

Since the Houses successful repeal-and-replace vote, the liberal media has relentlessly supported Democrats most extreme pronouncements. Politicoembraced the warped narrative about the bills campaign consequences, publishing a story Saturday with the headlineObamacare repeal vote upends 2018 House landscape.

But buried deep in that story are wise words from veteran GOP strategist Curt Anderson, who appropriately noted, Those who think Republicans will be defeated because of this vote are either in a parallel universe, or have been asleep for the past seven years. The notion that Obamacare is suddenly popular and will be missed is a mirage that seems real during the fog of war, but will disappear as you get closer to it.

Hes right. Obamacare is not popular now, and it definitely was not popular in 2014 when Republicans took control over the House and Senate for the first time in eightyears. Just look at Mondays CNBC report indicating that 60 percent of small-business owners support a repeal of Obamacare. They are the engine of job creation in the United States, they understand how harmful Obamacare has been to business. Still, leave it to CNNs always predictable Don Lemon to argue that Obamacare is collapsing only because President Trump is causing uncertainty among insurers. Give me a break.

But the lefts deceptive outrage does not end with Democratic congressional leaders or Don Lemon. The award for the most pretentious, sappy and over-the-top production goes to Rep.Joe Kennedy (D-Mass.), whose speech on the House floor was edited by a liberal organization to include a solemn violin soundtrack. Im serious. Striking a made-for-bad-TV pose, Kennedy argued that the repeal of Obamacare rejects common humanity and continues the administrations calculated attempt to divide up our nation. And the New York Times Charles Blow similarly weighed in with the wild overstatement that [w]hatever eventually comes of the bill, the death threat it poses for many Americans may well be a death wish Republicans have just issued for their own careers.

Its all a tad too much.

When Republicans voted to repeal and replace Obamacare last week, they fulfilled a major campaign promise, advanced the presidents agenda, and demonstrated the partys commitment to addressing the concerns of struggling Americans and taking the foot of Obamacare off the neck of small businesses, even as the Democrats refused to come to the table.

I cant help but question whether Democrats really think people are buying the argument that Republicans dont just want take away your health care, but want you dead, too. Does the left really believe people are so gullible, so naive? Maybe they just dont have anything affirmative to say.

I think the left is dreading the prospect of seeing a strong Republican Party get its act together and keep its promise to repeal and replace Obamacare. And, if this is the debate they really want to have, the Democrats drama and faux anguish only serve to damage their credibility.

See the rest here:
The Democrats aren't being honest about health care - Washington Post (blog)

No deal: House Democrats blast Senate leadership for allegedly rejecting budget proposal – kfor.com


kfor.com
No deal: House Democrats blast Senate leadership for allegedly rejecting budget proposal
kfor.com
In recent weeks, Democrats and Republicans have been fighting over a variety of issues related to the budget deficit. This past weekend, it seemed that there was a budget deal in the works. However, Democratic lawmakers announced that the deal fell ...

and more »

Read this article:
No deal: House Democrats blast Senate leadership for allegedly rejecting budget proposal - kfor.com

Beyond Trump, Democrats are bitterly divided – Sacramento Bee


cleveland.com
Beyond Trump, Democrats are bitterly divided
Sacramento Bee
Democrats on Capitol Hill are unified in opposition to President Donald Trump, fighting against his Cabinet picks, Supreme Court nominee and, last week, his health care bill. But increasingly, the question is whether Democrats can show that same kind ...
Democrats remain in denial about their own failures and myopia: Marc A. Thiessen (Opinion)cleveland.com
Democrats, don't get too giddy about 2018CNN
Hillary Clinton Is Back. Should Democrats Be Worried? | New RepublicNew Republic
WND.com -Townhall -Twitchy
all 48 news articles »

Read more from the original source:
Beyond Trump, Democrats are bitterly divided - Sacramento Bee