Archive for May, 2017

House Ethics Officials Move Slowly on Democrat Disclosures – LifeZette

The House Ethics Committee and its subordinate Office of Congressional Ethics may be slow-walkinga decision on whether to open aninvestigation into whether two Democrats, Rep. Adam Schiff and Rep. Jackie Speier, both of California, disclosedclassified information when criticizing President Donald Trump.

The concern that the two House ethics agencies are unusuallytardy to advance their consideration of the matter strikes a large contrast withhow quickly they moved on a House Republican last month arguably over a smaller matter.

I fear Democrats are manipulating the process for partisan gain.

On March 22, Rep. Devin Nunes (R-Calif.) spoke to the media about a discovery he made about incidental intelligence-gathering that affected President Donald Trumps transition team. Nunes said that not only the intel was gathered, but that federal officials unmasked Americans in their spying. Unmasking U.S.identities can only be done for specific, valid purposes andhas a high bar for approval.

It was a major news revelationthat enragedliberal pundits and Democratic lawmakers.

The discovery such intelligence had been collected, and unmasking was done, was a huge blow to Trumpscritics, who blasted the president for his March 4 tweets claiming that former President Barack Obama had wiretapped Trump Tower in Manhattan.

Nunes, the chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, traveled to the White House to brief Trump on what he found. He then gave a press conference outside the West Wing.

Liberal commentatorsand Democrats erupted after the revelations disrupted their narrative that Trump was unhinged to suggest the previous administration had been involved in surveillance of his team. Keith Olbermann, the oddball former MSNBC commentator now at GQ.com, went so far as to sayNunes should turn himself into the FBI, in one of the more unhinged reactions.

It was only a few weeks later, on April 6, that Nunes recused himself from the House Intelligence Committees work on Russia because the House Ethics Committee decided to investigate a complaint thatNunes may have confirmed the existence of classified information in a press conference. The GOP-led committee, chaired by U.S. Rep. Susan Brooks (R-Ind.), a moderate Republican, moved with unusual speed, and may have even decided to not wait for a recommendation from the Office of Congressional Ethics.

In total, about 15 days passed between Nunes press conference and an official opening of an investigation by the House Ethics Committee.

Nunes protested and said the charges were baseless. Nunes has said repeatedly that he did not break any rules on classified information in making his public statements. He remains chairman of the House Intelligence Committee.

One of the complainants against Nunes was MoveOn.org, the famously left-wing organization, which has been trying to dog Trump. The complaintcentered on Nunes response when askedif the information he had seen was related to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act. Officials are not supposed to discuss FISA data. Nunes said he didnt know. That was neither a confirmation or a denial.

On the other hand, citing public remarks by Schiff and Speier, the right-leaning watchdog organization Judicial Watch filed a complaint (using hand delivery) to the Office of Congressional Ethics on April 13. That was four weeks ago.

The Office of Congressional Ethics is evenly balanced between Republicans and Democrats. Its board can recommend action, which would lead to a full-on investigation by the House Ethics Committee.

But because the process is confidential, it is hard to know if a case is proceeding.

Tom Fitton, the president of Judicial Watch, is so far willing to cut the office and the larger committee some slack.

I expect we will be hearing something soon, said Fitton, speaking to LifeZette on Thursday. I dont think the issue can be avoided, thats for sure.

At least one House Republican official is not happy with the pace. The Democrats in the office and on the House committee are simply not interested in looking into public comments by Schiff and Speier about classified information, the source told LifeZette, requesting anonymity.

Schiff and Speiers dilemma is far worse than that of Nunes, the source said.

Schiff, who loves talking to TV cameras, is accused of telling the liberal-leaning Brookings Institution on March 21 about a conversation that Trumps former national security adviser, Michael Flynn, had with the Russian ambassador. By talking about it, Judicial Watch claims, Schiff brokerules confirming classified data.

Speiers disclosure was more explicit. Judicial Watch cited an April 3 report by the Daily Caller, in which Speier said we do know the contents and context of the conversation between Flynn and the Russian ambassador. That is a textbook confirmation.

Both disclosures are said to be worse than what Nunes did, according to the House Republican source. But why Brooks, the House Ethics Committee and the office are hesitant to move with as much speed and vigor is anyones guess.

Republicans are also curious as to when Nunes case will be closed.

Fitton said if the ethics office and the House Ethics Committee dont act on Schiff and Speier, they will be seen as just another Establishment apparatus being used to get at Trump. There is also concern that Democrats are more keenly taking advantage ofthe process than the Republican majority.

I fear Democrats are manipulating the process for partisan gain, said Fitton.

Read this article:
House Ethics Officials Move Slowly on Democrat Disclosures - LifeZette

Democratic event hopes to revitalize party in region – News-Press Now

The numbers proved ugly for Northwest Missouri Democrats. In the 16 counties in this corner of the state, the average victory margin for President Donald Trump in November stood at 74 percent, with the average majority for Gov. Eric Greitens at 64 percent.

Area Democrats cant build a time machine to revisit those outcomes, but they hope a new effort will mobilize the party for future elections.

Northwest Democrat Days will be held in St. Joseph Friday and Saturday, June 2 and 3.

The event grew from postmortems of past election cycles by local Democratic groups and a belief that the party has not been effective in spreading its message.

I think a lot of things that the Democrat Party stands for are good for rural, Northwest Missouri and North Missouri in general, David Peppard, a St. Joseph attorney helping organize the event, said.

Why would we sit around and not go out and let people know what we stand for and what we can do to make government more responsive for people in this area? Wed be crazy not to try to push that along.

The event also hopes to revive the tradition of the Pony Express Democrat Days, an annual gathering begun by Dwane and Dorothy Wylie in 1977. It was held for 20 years.

Unlike the regular Labor Day barbecues held by area Democrats in St. Joseph, with speeches by office seekers and a rallying of forces before fall elections, this event will have afternoon workshops about campaigning for office and grassroots organizing.

Sessions will be led by state lawmakers, by representatives of the state party, by activist group organizers and by past candidates for office.

The June 2 banquet, which will be held at the Green Acres Building, 3500 N. Village Drive, will have as its featured speakers Stephen Webber, chairman of the Missouri Democratic Party, and Cydney Mayfield, chair of the Missouri Democratic Rural Caucus.

The following night, a Saturday, the event shifts to Callison Hall, 1220 S. 10th St., where Missouri Auditor Nicole Galloway and state Sen. Scott Sifton of St. Louis County will speak.

Peppard said that the timing seems right for hosting Democrat Days, in the aftermath of national events like the Womens March and the March for Science and local endeavors like Our Revolution and the Persisterhood.

I think there is a high level of enthusiasm and were lucky to have our event kind of following that wave, he said.

Organizers hope to attract Democrats from throughout the northwestern part of the state. Those groups taking part in establishing the event are the United Democratic Club of Northwest Missouri, the Buchanan County Womens Democratic Club and the Northwest Missouri Central Labor Council.

Go here to read the rest:
Democratic event hopes to revitalize party in region - News-Press Now

Rob Quist, Montana candidate, gives Democrats hope for House seat – Washington Times

Still searching for their first major electoral victory against President Trump, Democrats are pinning their hopes on a cowboy poet to channel the energy of the grass roots into winning a Montana seat that Republicans have held for two decades.

After losing a Kansas race, being forced into a runoff in Georgia and all but ignoring a South Carolina special election, Democrats need a marquee win somewhere to show that anti-Trump anger can translate into votes at the ballot box.

Enter Rob Quist, a 69-year-old guitar-toting political newcomer who is the Democratic nominee for the May 25 showdown with Republican Greg Gianforte for Montanas lone U.S. House seat.

Montanas special, maybe offers a little bit of an opportunity for [Democrats], because it is not as red as the Kansas 4th Congressional District. But nonetheless, Donald Trump won Montana by over 20 points, said Geoffrey Skelley, of the University of Virginia Center for Politics.

Four Republican-held seats in the U.S. House opened up this year after their occupants took jobs in the Trump administration. Each of them was in fairly red territory, but Democrats predicted that an anti-Trump surge would energize their base and give them chances to fill those vacancies.

However, a Republican has already won the Kansas election and is expected to win the South Carolina race, leaving the Montana and Georgia contests as Democrats best bets.

Republicans are not taking anything for granted.

Donald Trump Jr., the presidents son, campaigned with Mr. Gianforte on Thursday for the second time in a less than a month. Vice President Mike Pence is slated to campaign on Friday with the Republican businessman, who lost his bid for governor last year.

The Congressional Leadership Fund, a political action committee dedicated to defending House Republicans, has emptied $2 million into the race, funding attack ads casting Mr. Quist as more Nancy Pelosi than Montana. The National Republican Campaign Committee rolled out a television ad Thursday raising questions about the singer-songwriters financial history.

Rob Quist hired us to build a dance floor at his house, a man named Kraig says in the ad. After we completed the job, he stiffed us.

Tina Olechowski, a Quist spokeswoman, said the attacks show that the Democrat is gaining ground in the race.

The momentum is behind Rob Quist, with Montanans across the state supporting Rob as an independent voice who will protect Montanas public lands, fight for affordable health care and support tax cuts for small businesses and working families, not millionaires, Ms. Olechowski said.

The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee has invested $600,000 into pro-Quist television ad buys and get-out-the-vote efforts, and populist Sen. Bernard Sanders of Vermont is slated to campaign with the Democrat this month.

Tightening polls

A Gravis poll shows that Mr. Quist has cut Mr. Gianfortes lead to 8 percentage points in a district that Republican Rep. Ryan Zinke won by 15 points in November. Mr. Zinke stepped down to become Mr. Trumps interior secretary.

Our grass-roots momentum is unstoppable, the Quist campaign said in one of a series of fundraising emails this week. Thats why D.C. Republicans are scrambling to stop us theyre terrified that were going to win this seat. So folks, lets deal them a defeat that they wont forget.

Mr. Sanders and other liberal activists are hoping national Democratic power brokers dont shortchange the race. They criticized the party for not putting more effort into the Kansas race last month, when Democrat James Thompson came within 7 percentage points of defeating Republican Ron Estes. Mr. Trump carried the district by 27 points in November.

Mr. Skelley said Georgia, where Democrat Jon Ossoff narrowly missed winning the race outright last month, is still the partys best shot but that their battles are all uphill. Democrats now are struggling to find a balance between keeping activists bullish while tempering expectations.

Most of the special elections are taking place in districts that Democrats would need absolutely everything and then some to go their way to actually win, Mr. Skelley said.

The special election in Montana will be the first since the House narrowly voted last week to repeal and replace Obamacare, which has added to the liberal outrage against Mr. Trump and his Republican allies on Capitol Hill.

The New York Times reported last week that Mr. Gianforte has sent mixed messages about the health care bill, telling donors in a private phone call that he was thankful for its approval in the House, while his aides said he would not have voted for the bill because he did not know what was in it.

Tom Perez, chairman of the Democratic National Committee, blasted out a fundraising email this week reminding voters that the last time Democrats held Montanas lone seat in the House was 20 years ago.

But in a couple of weeks, we have a chance to flip that seat from red to blue and elect someone who will represent Montana values in Congress standing up for working people, protecting affordable health care and Medicare, and demanding equality and fair treatment for all, Mr. Perez said.

Christy Setzer, a Democratic strategist, said both parties could walk away from the special election season with bragging rights.

In this case, everyone has reason for optimism: Republicans can take heart that Democrats havent yet outright won a new seat; Democrats can feel good about overperforming by double digits in deep-red states, Ms. Setzer said. These seats are the Everest of uphill climbs seats that Republicans won by 20 points which means that Democrats could go winless in special election season and still take back the House next year.

Read more here:
Rob Quist, Montana candidate, gives Democrats hope for House seat - Washington Times

Democrat Texas Sheriffs Tell ‘Half-Truth’ About Crime in Sanctuary Cities, Says PolitiFact – Breitbart News

SIGN UP FOR OUR NEWSLETTER

In opposition to the then-pending Senate Bill 4, legislation that makes law enforcement officials in sanctuary jurisdictions subject to civil and criminal penalties if they ignore immigration detainers, Sheriff Hernandez joined with Bexar County Sheriff Javier Salazar, Dallas County Sheriff Lupe Valdez, El Paso County Sheriff Richard Wiles, and Harris County Sheriff Ed Gonzalez, in an op-ed published in the Austin American-Statesman. PolitiFact looked into claims made by the sheriffs and rated their statement as Half-True. Politifact defines Half-True as The statement is partially accurate but leaves out important details or takes things out of context.

In my book, a half true for an open borders study from Politifact means it was definitely bogus, Center for Immigration Studies Director of Policy Studies Jessica Vaughn told Breitbart Texas on Wednesday evening.It means we would like it to be true but it wasnt.

After declaring the FBI report cited by the sheriffs of Texas five largest counties did not exist, PolitiFact went on to try and salvage their statement.

Travis County Spokesperson Kristen Dark told PolitiFact the sheriffs drew their claim from what the fact checkers dubbed a liberal public policy research and advocacy group, the Center for American Progress. That report claims that 2015 crime statistics in 608 sanctuary counties was significantly lower than in counties that were more frequently honoring immigration detainers. PolitiFact then challenged that report because it did not identify any counties. The reports author, University of California Political Scientist Tom K. Wong, responded to the fact checkers and cited a report from the San Francisco-based Immigrant Legal Resource Center. He also forwarded an alleged ICE spreadsheet he said identifies counties that do or do not accept immigration detainers.

The Center for Immigration studies identifies 300 jurisdictions as sanctuaries, according to Vaughan.

After analyzing all of the information they could find on the matter, the publication concluded Any implication the FBI reached this conclusion is wrong; the agency has not aired such findings. The fact checkers then backtracked one more time stating, Still, an outside analysis of 2015 FBI-collected crime statistics supports the idea that communities offering sanctuary to unauthorized residents have less total crime. Then again, thatanalysis didnt independently confirm the sanctuary status of each county nor did it fine-tune the crime statistics as much as criminologists would prefer before reaching cause-effect conclusions.

On balance, we find the sheriffs statement Half True, PolitiFact stated.

Bob Priceserves as associate editor and senior political news contributor for Breitbart Texas. He is a founding member of the Breitbart Texas team. Follow him on Twitter@BobPriceBBTXandFacebook.

Visit link:
Democrat Texas Sheriffs Tell 'Half-Truth' About Crime in Sanctuary Cities, Says PolitiFact - Breitbart News

A Republican Congressman Meets His Angry Constituency – The Atlantic

WILLINGBORO, N.J. Representative Tom MacArthur knew well what he was getting into when he showed up in this Democratic stronghold on Wednesday .

The second-term lawmaker who had almost single-handedly resuscitated the House Republican health-care bill would hear from the constituents who now despised him for playing hero at their expense. He had come back to face a particular kind of musicthe cacophony of boos, jeers, and deprecatory chants that make up the 21st century congressional town hall.

But MacArthur was determined to play his own song first. He would tell the health-care saga of his family: his biological mother who died of cancer when he was four, his step-mother who died of cancer many years later, and the most wrenching of all, his daughter Gracie who died at age 11 after struggling her entire brief life with a rare brain condition. A wealthy insurance executive before entering politics, MacArthur would use Gracies story as an ice-breaker, a reminder to the 200 or so antsy and angered constituents seated around him that he knew something about their anxiety over hospital bills and preexisting conditions, and to explain that he struck his deal with House conservatives because he genuinely wanted to improve the nations health insurance market.

He wanted to disarm them, but they did not want to be disarmed. And they did not want to hear Gracies story.

Shame! one constituent yelled almost as soon as MacArthur uttered his late daughters name.

Weve heard this story! shouted another. We know all about you!

MacArthur appeared momentarily taken aback. I will say shame on you, actually, he replied, more in disappointment than in anger. If you want me to listen to you, Im going to ask you to listen to me.

It was going to be that kind of night.

* * *

Town hall meetings have long since lost their innocence as the purest incarnation of American representative democracy. In the post-Tea Party era, they are largely performative events, set pieces for the pre-ordained political backlash. Activist groups mobilize attendance, ensure television coverage and Facebook live-streams, prepare talking points and detailed questions for constituents to ask. Citizens confront their legislators with ever increasing and perhaps slightly rehearsed passion, sometimes reading their questions from a script or shouting a monologue aimed as much at the cameras in the back as at the congressman in front of them. In response, congressional offices are trying harder to ensure the event hall is filled with actual constituents, not outsiders bussed in from districts far and wide.

The House Votes to Repeal Obamacare

As town halls have lost their authenticity, many House Republicans are forgoing them entirely. In the week after passing legislation to reshape the nations health-care system, barely more than a dozen of the 238 GOP lawmakers have scheduled in-person constituent events. And none were higher on the marquee than MacArthurs.

The Willingboro community center named for John F. Kennedy seemed ready for a much bigger starperhaps a top-tier presidential primary contenderthan a local congressman unknown outside his district until a few weeks ago. The parked cars snaked back more than a quarter-mile along the suburban streets leading up to the Kennedy Center, situated in the middle of a township in south Jersey a couple miles east of the Delaware River and the Pennsylvania border.

The strong showing suggested a venue much larger than it actually was: There were seats for about 200 people in a theater-in-the-round set-up, but hundreds more who lined up outside were turned away. A separate group of protesters picketed nearby, complete with a human-sized inflated chicken, signs that read This Congressmen Hates Women, and others much nastier than that. Police patrolled outside, and electronic signs warned constituents that neither large bags nor any signs or posters would be allowed inside. (A few of the demonstrators stayed all night, watching the town hall via Facebook on their phones until their batteries eventually died.) Those who did make it in wore stickers that said MacArthur Constituent, and many of them snuck in red and green handkerchiefs to wave in approval or disapproval.

MacArthur, 56, won his second term representing New Jerseys 3rd congressional district in November with nearly 60 percent of the vote, an improvement over his 53-44 margin in 2014. But the district is more narrowly divided between the parties, split between heavily Republican Ocean County and the much more liberal Burlington County across the New Jersey Pine Barrens.

Were here to show him were unhappy and he should know were coming in 2018, Penn Reagan, a 64-year-old retiree, told me just before MacArthur entered the room. But he added: Im not actually expecting to hear anything I want to hear.

A former councilman who speaks in the easy manner of a warm but practiced politician, MacArthur chose to hold his town hall in Willingboro precisely because the majority-African-American town is on the other side of his political base.

Donald Trump won 9 percent of the vote here, he told the restive crowd, eliciting a few claps and chuckles. I crushed it with 12 percent of the vote.

Ostensibly, MacArthur had come to Willingboro to explain and defend the GOPs American Health Care Act, and in particular the amendment he wrote that saved it. Back in January, he had been one of just nine House Republicans to vote against a budget bill that laid the procedural groundwork for the party to repeal and replace the Affordable Care Act. Three months later, however, he was instrumental in the effort to do just that. MacArthurs amendment bowed to a demand from the conservative House Freedom Caucus that the GOP bill allow states to seek a waiver opting out of some of Obamacares core insurance mandates, including its ban on insurers charging higher premiums to people with preexisting conditions. His deal with conservatives annoyed fellow members of the moderate Tuesday Group, of which MacArthur is one of three co-chairman. But it infuriated the 3rd district residents who lined up early on Wednesday evening to make sure they could confront him directly.

One by one, over a nearly five-hour marathon of questions, MacArthurs constituents berated him in visceral terms over the health-care billand to a lesser extent, his steadfast support for President Trump. Not one of the dozens who spoke on Wednesday night praised either the AHCA or the president.

I have sympathy for your mother. I have sympathy for your daughter. But you did not listen to the lessons they were trying to teach you, Geoff Ginter, a 47-year-old medical assistant wearing his hospital scrubs, told MacArthur. Ginter described how his wife, who has a preexisting condition as a result of having survived breast cancer, would now have renewed fear because of the possibility that he could lose his insurance and cause her rates to skyrocket under the loophole MacArthurs amendment could create. You came after my wife, Ginter said, his voice slow and rising. You have been the single greatest threat to my family in the entire world. You are the reason I stay up at night. When Ginter initially suggested he would not relinquish the microphone, two police officers began to edge closer to him. MacArthur allowed him to speak for 10 minutes, after which Ginter told him he didnt even want to hear his response.

Other constituents trained their ire on Trump, demanding to know whether MacArthur would back a special prosecutor to investigate his campaigns ties to Russia (Not yet, he said) and practically pleading with him to stand up to the president. Why do you Republicans all sit and listen to Donald Trump lie? asked one woman. He lies and lies and lies. You have to know hes lying. Trump was the topic MacArthur least wanted to discuss, and he replied with something of a refrain. Im neither going to defend nor attack everything the president says, he answered. At another point, he drew more boos when he said of Trump, Congress is not the board of directors for the White House, and Im not going to answer for everything he says or does.

At the beginning of the event, MacArthur had promised to stay until every question had been asked. And despite a couple of moments when the room nearly deteriorated into shouting, he kept his word. Though the crowd thinned from a couple hundred to a couple dozen as the hours dragged on, the congressman stayed standing, and responding, for nearly five hours.

Youve really taken a beating tonight, a constituent named Ruth Gage told him. For both the congressman and the crowd, that appeared to be the point.

MacArthur kept his coolmostly. When one constituent shouted him down as an idiot! MacArthur complained about the lack of civil discourse. I wonder, he said to the crowd, how any one of you would perform in Congress with that attitude.

After MacArthur asked them at another point not to be disrespectful, one man replied: Can I be disrespectful on behalf of all the people youre going to kill?

* * *

Through it all, however, a strange thing happened: A Republican congressman had a candid, detailed discussion about health-care policy with his constituents. When they spoke up on behalf of a single-payer, Medicare-for-All plan, MacArthur explained why he didnt support it. When he warned about allowing government bureaucrats to make too many health-care decisions, they asked why it would be any worse than insurance company bureaucrats doing the same thing now.

The residents who came to give MacArthur a piece of their mind were deeply familiar with the particulars of the bill he supported and the amendment he authored, because they knew it could impact them directly. When one attendee asked people to stand if they had a preexisting condition, nearly everyone in the room rose. They knew that even though MacArthur was correct in saying the GOP maintained the requirement that insurers offer coverage to everyone, his amendment could allow companies in some states to charge them much more money for a policy.

A 39-year-old named Derek described how because of a heart condition he had had since he was 23, he could be priced out of the insurance market if he lost his job and went without coverage for more than two months if the AHCA became law. This is something that is very real, he told MacArthur. Without health-care coverage, Im dead.

The congressman acknowledged his point. Your question shows that you really understand the issue. Youve nailed the issue, MacArthur told him. He explained that the Republican proposal included $138 billion to help that class of people, who could face steep rates in high-risk pools in states that received waivers from the federal government. Health policy analysts have warned that pot of money wont be nearly sufficient, and by the end of the evening, MacArthur conceded that might be the case. If it turns out its not enough, he said, I will be the first on line to make sure it is enough.

After hours of back-and-forth, that seemed about as far as anyone had moved. MacArthur listened intently to the emotional pleas and angry lashings of his constituents, but he voiced no regrets about his handling of health care or his support for the AHCA. When someone would vociferously defend Obamacare or denounce Trump, MacArthur would point back to the Republican voters across the Pine Barrens: I hear you, but there are loads of other people who dont see it that way. It was a polite way of pointing to the scoreboard, and the 59 percent of 3rd district voters who sided with him in November.

There are indications, however, that MacArthurs position isnt as safe as he might assume. Political forecasters have moved his district a notch toward Democrats after the Republicans voted for their unpopular bill last week, making it the kind of House seat that could flip parties in a wave election. A former national-security staffer who coordinated anti-ISIS strategy for the Obama White House, Andy Kim, has already started raising money to challenge him and could make a stronger opponent than the Democratic nominee last year, who was haunted by legal troubles. And while there didnt appear to be any Trump voters in attendance on Wednesday night, there were Democrats and independents who had voted for MacArthur. I told everyone you were the best thing since cream cheese, Ellen Bertuglia, 73, told the congressman. I see something thats happened to you, and it scares me. She said MacArthur had become too close to Trump and hadnt kept his commitment to work with Democrats. He zonked you, Bertuglia said of the president.

In an interview later, Bertuglia said she was worried about the health-care bill (I got pre-existing stuff all over) and probably wouldnt vote for MacArthur again. But she added a caveat: If he stands up and does something about Trump, I might change my mind.

Its a show, Nmawa Toe, a 40-year-old computer repairman, told me after many in the crowd had left. He wants to show that hes not afraid, but hes not answering any questions.

Earlier in the evening, Toe had confronted MacArthur directly. Youve been talking a lot about your constituents on the other side of the Pine Barrens and how they affect your policy decisions, he said. If you want to come back here, if you want another term, you might want to listen to what these people have to say, too.

MacArthur said it was a great question. Im always trying to find the intersection of what I believe and what my constituents believe, he replied. The congressman seemed genuinely to believe he had found that sweet spot, notwithstanding the hundreds of people who disagreed, and who on Wednesday night tried so desperately to make him see that he had not.

Go here to see the original:
A Republican Congressman Meets His Angry Constituency - The Atlantic