Archive for May, 2017

Liberals blow a gasket over the stunning answers the new Miss USA gave on health care and feminism – TheBlaze.com

The newly minted Miss USA ignited a firestorm of liberal outrage Sunday after she gave very non-progressive answers when asked about health care and feminism, specifically declaring health care a privilege and ripping modern feminism.

During the pageants question-and-answer period, 25-year-old Kra McCullough was asked whether she believes health care is a right or a privilege for Americans.

McCullough, who came to the pageant as Miss District of Columbia, stunned much of America, especially liberals, with her answer.

Im definitely going to say its a privilege, McCullough said, explaining that Americans shouldnt be forced by the government to pay for the health care of other Americans.

McCullough, who works as a government scientist for the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, further explained:

As a government employee, Im granted health care. And I see firsthand that for one, to have health care, you need to have jobs, so therefore we need to continue to cultivate this environment that were given the opportunity to have health care as well as jobs so that (sic) all the American citizens worldwide.

Needless to say, the lefts Twitter reaction to McCulloughs answer was swift:

Others, however, defended McCullough, including one of her fellow competitors, Miss Massachusetts Alissa Musto:

Still, McCulloughs answer on health care wasnt her only remark that outraged liberals. When later asked for her views on feminism and whether she believes shes a feminist, McCullough said she doesnt like the word feminist.

As a woman scientist in the government, Id like to lately transpose the word feminism to equalism, she said.

Heres how people reacted to that answer:

https://twitter.com/Shainaflanagan1/status/863934225606746112

McCullough became the second Miss District of Columbia in a row to win the annual pageant. Deshauna Barber, an Army officer, won in 2016.

Read more from the original source:
Liberals blow a gasket over the stunning answers the new Miss USA gave on health care and feminism - TheBlaze.com

Liberals Are An Inferno Of Flaming Crazy And We Should Pour Gasoline On The Fire – Townhall

|

Posted: May 15, 2017 12:01 AM

Pity the Democrats, to the extent you can without bursting into hysterical laughter at their agony. America has thoroughly rejected them in every branch of the federal government plus out in the states, and on top of that they were utterly humiliated by the guy they all claimed was a complete moron. Which begs the question what does that make the sanctimonious harpy he crushed in the Electoral College?

They still havent realized whats going on. Their ego-driven drive to dominate normal people and shape us into New Socialist Nongendered Beings has blinded them to the bitter reality.

We think they, along with their minions in the media, in Hollywood, and on campus, suck.

They are baffled at our refusal to acknowledge their moral, intellectual, and political superiority. It doesnt just compute.

Yeah, well compute this, geebos.

You look nuts. I mean wacko, zonked out, Hey, that goldfish is firing a mind control laser at my brain and making me break dance nuts.

But dont stop. No, pump it up. Youre at 11, and I say take it to 12.

This is great!

All this insanity is going to help us normals retain power, from your gyno-hat marches to the fake hate crimes to your insistence that the Russians are responsible for everything from Hillary losing the election to the rarely-discussed but well-known liberal epidemic of ED.

Heres a little test. Its been about six months since Trump treated The Smartest Most Accomplished Woman In The World like a NordicTrack treats Harry Reid, and does anyone know even one person who has said, You know, I voted for Trump, but now after Neil Gorsuch, General Mattis and H.R. McMaster, I really wish I had checked the box for Felonia von Pantsuit?

Im not talking about alt-right weirdos they dont count. I mean literally, unless they remove their off-brand Nike knock-offs. I mean normal people. Who voted for Trump and now says something remotely like this?

Yeah, I really regret not letting Hillary pick a SCOTUS judge who thinks the Constitution bans guns but mandates taxpayer-subsidized transsexual abortions!

Wow, that 70% drop in illegal alien entries into America and all those deportations of MS-13 guys are depriving the country of valuable, productive future Democrat voters!

Gosh, I hate so much how Trump has paid attention to that sliver of our country lying between I-5 and I-95!

It was Ashley Judds v-cap slam poetry, combined with Bill Nyes sex confusion clip, that convinced me what America needs is liberals back in power!

No one.

No one who voted for Trump has ever said any of those things. Oh, they might have voted for him reluctantly, but no statistically significant slice of them wish they hadnt.

But the Democrats work under the assumption that such folk exist and are receptive to their tantrums. Good! These liberals are crazy, and theyre stupid, and we totally need to encourage them to keep doing crazy, stupid things.

We conservatives are supposed to be terrified by polls that say that the House could flip to the Dems in 2018. Just ask President Clinton about how the liberal wishcasting multiplier effect on the polls worked for her, but the fact is that we have 18 months to go. On the Democrat side, it looks to be 18 months of kookiness that will leave us normals scratching our heads and snickering.

Yes, I know that just this morning I was saying Comey should have been fired but then Trump actually did it and his doing what I suggested is the worst constitutional crisis ever!

Bombing Putins ally was a cunning ploy to throw us off the trail!

Why, even though failed FBI Director Jim Comey, James MC Leakmaster J Clapper, Diane Crypt-keeping It Real Feinstein, and even noted particle physicist Maxine Waters concede that theres no evidence that Trump and Putin are breeding a collusive love child, Im still convinced of the existence of this sweeping, enormous, and invisible conspiracy that occurred for some reason somehow, and about which absolutely zero evidence of Trump collusion has leaked out during ten months of colonoscopy-esque investigation despite everything else leaking out.

Sounds legit.

Sure, Congress polls right around the popularity of Outhouse scuba diving and Borrowing Charlie Sheens toothbrush, but then who wants to live in a country where we like our politicians? Its not like in 2016 we were high-fiving these guys. We get that a GOP Congress is a necessary evil. But we also get that a Democrat Congress is an unnecessary evil.

And while these liberal spazzes and their fussy Fredocon gimps are shrieking about the coming Armageddon in their high-pitched, girlish voices, Trump is just rolling along. Special prosecutor, schmecial prosecutor hes not falling for it. And did you see the ten judges he just nominated? You usually have to come up with roses and champagne to score like that.

Heres how this goes. The Democrats, along with the media and Team Tinfoil, keep whining about Russians Russians Russians, and normal people keep tuning them out. While theyre babbling about nonsense that means nothing outside of the coastal looney bins, normal people are tuning into how the stock market and the job market just keep getting better, how were not taking guff from foreign creeps anymore, and were not talking about how much taxes will go up but about how much theyll go down.

Tax reform is going to pass. Obamacare is getting repealed its as dead in the Senate as it was in the House, which is not at all. Our military is getting rebuilt. Were going to stop leading with our chin on trade. Things are going to keep getting better, and people will see it.

The only way the President can still screw this up is by choosing to screw this up. He wont do it by messing with liberals. Keep tweeting those twerps into a sputtering rage! It pays dividends every time he provokes them to new heights of lunacy.

No, the President only fails by forgetting his conservative friends, and that is becoming a problem. Where are the hardcore cons at State and Defense? He needs to get solid business leader Anthony Scaramucci into the White House, like we conservatives were promised (A guy who can raise $20 million might come in handy). And as for judges, well, the motto for conservatives is No Justice Willett, No Peace.

The Democrats are being crazy and its a bad look. So lets keep helping them do it. We can pity them even as we laugh at them.

Federal Judges Ask if Travel Ban Is Biased Against Muslims

More here:
Liberals Are An Inferno Of Flaming Crazy And We Should Pour Gasoline On The Fire - Townhall

The difference between Conservative and Liberal – Springfield News-Leader

Subscribe today for full access on your desktop, tablet, and mobile device.

Let friends in your social network know what you are reading about

Conservative v. Liberal: Over the years Conservatives came to be symbolized by the largest, most powerful land animal on earth, the elephant. Liberals are symbolized by the jackass for obvious reasons.

Try Another

Audio CAPTCHA

Image CAPTCHA

Help

CancelSend

A link has been sent to your friend's email address.

A link has been posted to your Facebook feed.

Warren Christopherson, Springfield 2:23 p.m. CT May 15, 2017

Over the years Conservatives came to be symbolized by the largest, most powerful land animal on earth, the elephant. Liberals are symbolized by the jackass for obvious reasons.

Most college professors, social workers, personal injury attorneys, journalists, film makers in Hollywood, group therapists and community organizers are liberals. Liberals meddled in our national pastime and invented the designated hitter rule because it wasnt fair to make the pitcher also bat.

Conservatives are members of the military, big game hunters, rodeo cowboys, lumberjacks, construction workers, firemen, medical doctors, police officers, engineers, corporate executives, athletes, airline pilots, and generally anyone who works productively. Conservatives who own companies hire other Conservatives who want to work for a living.

Liberals produce little or nothing. They like to govern the producers and decide what to do with the production. Liberals believe Europeans are more enlightened than Americans. That is why most of the liberals remained in Europe when Conservatives were coming to America. They crept in after the Wild West was tamed and created a business of trying to get more for nothing.

Conservatives want to make America Great Again while Liberals want to see America go down the rabbit hole and be more like Europe.

Read or Share this story: http://sgfnow.co/2rj3RdB

0:55

0) { %>

0) { %>

Originally posted here:
The difference between Conservative and Liberal - Springfield News-Leader

WA Liberals living in ‘Matrix-style’ reality, refusing to admit defeat, Labor says – ABC Online

Posted May 16, 2017 19:29:05

The WA Liberal Party is operating in a "Matrix-style" alternate reality two months on from its landslide state election loss, the McGowan Government has claimed.

On the first regular parliamentary sitting day since Labor toppled the Barnett government, the new administration accused the Liberals of acting like a "deposed monarchy" and not accepting the March election result.

The attack on the Mike Nahan-led Opposition came as the Liberals sought to blame the new Government for having to urgently seek parliamentary approval to borrow billions of dollars, to ensure expenses could be met beyond July.

Dr Nahan said the new Government had to seek the $11 billion loan to pay for its own promises, a comment which Treasurer Ben Wyatt described as being derived from a "simulated reality".

"You don't get to treat this as some sort of Matrix-style 'I'll swallow the blue pill and wake up in the bed with everything all OK' because unfortunately the $11 billion I'm having to borrow is your spending plan," Mr Wyatt told Parliament.

"You can swallow those blue pills as much as you want but I have got a couple of red ones for you."

Transport Minister Rita Saffioti then picked up the attack, saying the Liberals still had not accepted the March election result and that was why they had refused to move into their opposition offices.

"The Opposition are walking around [like] a deposed monarchy and don't realise they are in opposition," she said.

The new Government has at times goaded the Liberals for sticking with controversial key policies they took to the March election such as the Perth Freight Link and the sale of Western Power claiming it was evidence they had not accepted the result.

The Liberals also came under fire last Thursday after using their first parliamentary question since the election to ask the Premier about a pledge he made five years ago not to take up office in the renovated Department of Premier and Cabinet home at Hale House.

But ahead of today's sitting, senior Liberal MP Dean Nalder defended Dr Nahan's performance and said he had faith in his parliamentary strategy.

"The first day was ceremonial and it was always seen to be a ceremonial day," he said.

"It was felt that some serious questions would get lost and we would wait until the start of parliament proper, which is this week."

The Liberals changed tack in their second Question Time, probing Labor about its investigation into the Barnett government's spending, and asking whether it would also focus on decisions Labor had made in office.

The Liberals have described the $1.5 million commission of inquiry, headed by former Treasury boss John Langolaunt, as a "witch hunt".

Topics: government-and-politics, wa

Excerpt from:
WA Liberals living in 'Matrix-style' reality, refusing to admit defeat, Labor says - ABC Online

Democrats set for first view of potential 2020 candidates – CNN

A who's who of prospects for the Democratic 2020 presidential nomination -- none declared, of course, but none ruling national ambitions out, either -- will appear at a daylong event hosted by the Center for American Progress.

The liberal think tank's first-ever "Ideas Conference" is poised to allow those vying to lead the party to test-drive their economic messages and arguments a year and a half before any of them would actually have to head to Iowa and New Hampshire to campaign.

Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren is set to deliver the lunchtime keynote, while New Jersey Sen. Cory Booker will deliver the closing speech. Also on tap -- and seen as potential 2020 candidates -- are New York Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand, California Sen. Kamala Harris, Minnesota Sen. Amy Klobuchar, Connecticut Sen. Chris Murphy and Oregon Sen. Jeff Merkley.

From the executive ranks, Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti will open the event, while Montana Gov. Steve Bullock, Virginia Gov. Terry McAuliffe and North Carolina Gov. Roy Cooper are also set for speaking roles.

Other leading Democrats, including House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, liberal mega-donor Tom Steyer, Gold Star father Khizr Khan and influential activists are slated to appear.

The event comes as the Democratic Party -- energized by a protest movement unlike anything the party has seen for decades -- searches for new voices at its forefront.

Former President Barack Obama has departed the political stage for now, and former Vice President Joe Biden told a crowd recently that he will not run in 2020.

It's left Democrats facing a nominating contest much more like 2004, when John Kerry emerged from a wide-open field, or 2008, when Obama bested Hillary Clinton and John Edwards, than recent contests with well-established incumbents or front-runners.

By this stage in those cycles, prospective candidates "were working pretty hard at it" behind the scenes, said Bob Shrum, a veteran of Democratic campaigns, including Al Gore's in 2000 and Kerry's in 2004.

"There's a lot more happening behind the scenes in terms of folks maneuvering to line up fundraisers, political talent, how they're going to put a campaign together," Shrum said.

So at a cattle call like Tuesday's, he said, "you want to do well."

"First of all, you have to stand up to Trump -- visibly, consistently and cogently -- on everything from health care to tax fairness to the Russia investigation," he said. "Two, articulate a compelling message on economic and social justice, and you can't choose one over the other."

Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders has by far the largest megaphone of any Democrat -- and his massive email list built in 2016 would give him a huge fundraising advantage. But Sanders would also be 79 years old on Election Day 2020.

For other potential candidates, the 2018 midterm cycle is more important. It's an opportunity to curry favor with House members and senators on the ballot this cycle by campaigning and raising money for them while also elevating their own profiles and meeting local party honchos, said Mitch Stewart, a founding partner of 270 Strategies and a veteran of Obama's campaigns.

Stewart argued cattle calls are "less important now" than they were in 2004 and 2008 -- in part because social media tools like Twitter allow more opportunities for potential candidates to reach wide swaths of the party's electorate. He pointed to Booker's Twitter account during his tenure as Newark mayor as an example.

But events like Tuesday's also offer potential candidates opportunities to test-drive a message that reaches beyond an energetic base, Stewart said.

"What I haven't really seen any of the potential Democratic candidates do is put out a positive message that can try to break the bond that Trump has with some of his voters," he said.

"And I think right now, it's just good to have activism, it's good to have energy," he said. "But at some point, a candidate's going to have to channel that energy into something a bit more constructive and talk about how Democrats offer a different economic vision that can peel off some of these voters that were sort of duped by Trump."

Read more from the original source:
Democrats set for first view of potential 2020 candidates - CNN