Archive for May, 2017

Rand Paul: Sessions’ sentencing plan would ruin lives …

Mandatory minimum sentences have unfairly and disproportionately incarcerated a generation of minorities. Eric Holder, the attorney general under President Obama, issued guidelines to U.S. Attorneys that they should refrain from seeking long sentences for nonviolent drug offenders. I agreed with him then and still do. In fact, I'm the author of a bipartisan bill with Senator Leahy to change the law on this matter. Until we pass that bill, though, the discretion on enforcement -- and the lives of many young drug offenders -- lies with the current attorney general

The attorney general's new guidelines, a reversal of a policy that was working, will accentuate the injustice in our criminal justice system. We should be treating our nation's drug epidemic for what it is -- a public health crisis, not an excuse to send people to prison and turn a mistake into a tragedy.

And make no mistake, the lives of many drug offenders are ruined the day they receive that long sentence the attorney general wants them to have.

Yet today, a third of African-American males are still prevented from voting, primarily because of the War on Drugs.

The War on Drugs has disproportionately affected young black males.

Why are the arrest rates so lopsided? Because it is easier to go into urban areas and make arrests than suburban areas. Arrest statistics matter when cities apply for federal grants. It doesn't take much imagination to understand that it's easier to round up, arrest, and convict poor kids than it is to convict rich kids.

I know a guy about my age in Kentucky who was arrested and convicted for growing marijuana plants in his apartment closet in college.

Thirty years later, he still can't vote, can't own a gun, and, when he looks for work, he must check the box -- the box that basically says, "I'm a convicted felon, and I guess I'll always be one."

He hasn't been arrested or convicted for 30 years -- but still can't vote or have his Second Amendment rights. Getting a job is nearly impossible for him.

Mandatory sentencing automatically imposes a minimum number of years in prison for specific crimes -- usually related to drugs.

I want to go the opposite way from the attorney general. That's why I've partnered with Senator Leahy and once again will be reintroducing the Justice Safety Valve Act.

This isn't about legalizing drugs. It is about making the punishment more fitting and not ruining more lives.

The legislation is short and simple. It amends current law to grant judges authority to impose a sentence below a statutory mandatory minimum.

In other words, we are not repealing mandatory minimums on the books -- we are merely allowing a judge to issue a sentence below a mandatory minimum if certain requirements are met.

We need this legislation because while there is an existing safety valve in current law, it is very limited. It has a strict five-part test, and only about 23% of all drug offenders qualified for the safety valve.

The injustice of mandatory minimum sentences is impossible to ignore when you hear the stories of the victims.

His friend turned out to be a police informant, and he was charged with dealing drugs. Horner pleaded guilty and was later sentenced to the mandatory minimum of 25 years in jail.

This young man had been in a car where drugs were found. I don't know about you, but I'm pretty sure one of us might have been in a car in our youth where someone might have had drugs. Before the arrest, according to news reports, this young man was going to be the first in his family to go to college.

Each case should be judged on its own merits. Mandatory minimums prevent this from happening.

Mandatory minimum sentencing has done little to address the very real problem of drug abuse while also doing great damage by destroying so many lives, and most Americans now realize it.

I urge the attorney general to reconsider his recent action. But even more importantly, I urge my colleagues to consider bipartisan legislation to fix this problem in the law where it should be handled. Congress can end this injustice, and I look forward to leading this fight for justice.

Read more:
Rand Paul: Sessions' sentencing plan would ruin lives ...

Rand Paul: Sessions’ sentencing plan would ruin lives – CNN

Mandatory minimum sentences have unfairly and disproportionately incarcerated a generation of minorities. Eric Holder, the attorney general under President Obama, issued guidelines to U.S. Attorneys that they should refrain from seeking long sentences for nonviolent drug offenders. I agreed with him then and still do. In fact, I'm the author of a bipartisan bill with Senator Leahy to change the law on this matter. Until we pass that bill, though, the discretion on enforcement -- and the lives of many young drug offenders -- lies with the current attorney general

The attorney general's new guidelines, a reversal of a policy that was working, will accentuate the injustice in our criminal justice system. We should be treating our nation's drug epidemic for what it is -- a public health crisis, not an excuse to send people to prison and turn a mistake into a tragedy.

And make no mistake, the lives of many drug offenders are ruined the day they receive that long sentence the attorney general wants them to have.

Yet today, a third of African-American males are still prevented from voting, primarily because of the War on Drugs.

The War on Drugs has disproportionately affected young black males.

Why are the arrest rates so lopsided? Because it is easier to go into urban areas and make arrests than suburban areas. Arrest statistics matter when cities apply for federal grants. It doesn't take much imagination to understand that it's easier to round up, arrest, and convict poor kids than it is to convict rich kids.

I know a guy about my age in Kentucky who was arrested and convicted for growing marijuana plants in his apartment closet in college.

Thirty years later, he still can't vote, can't own a gun, and, when he looks for work, he must check the box -- the box that basically says, "I'm a convicted felon, and I guess I'll always be one."

He hasn't been arrested or convicted for 30 years -- but still can't vote or have his Second Amendment rights. Getting a job is nearly impossible for him.

Mandatory sentencing automatically imposes a minimum number of years in prison for specific crimes -- usually related to drugs.

I want to go the opposite way from the attorney general. That's why I've partnered with Senator Leahy and once again will be reintroducing the Justice Safety Valve Act.

This isn't about legalizing drugs. It is about making the punishment more fitting and not ruining more lives.

The legislation is short and simple. It amends current law to grant judges authority to impose a sentence below a statutory mandatory minimum.

In other words, we are not repealing mandatory minimums on the books -- we are merely allowing a judge to issue a sentence below a mandatory minimum if certain requirements are met.

We need this legislation because while there is an existing safety valve in current law, it is very limited. It has a strict five-part test, and only about 23% of all drug offenders qualified for the safety valve.

The injustice of mandatory minimum sentences is impossible to ignore when you hear the stories of the victims.

His friend turned out to be a police informant, and he was charged with dealing drugs. Horner pleaded guilty and was later sentenced to the mandatory minimum of 25 years in jail.

This young man had been in a car where drugs were found. I don't know about you, but I'm pretty sure one of us might have been in a car in our youth where someone might have had drugs. Before the arrest, according to news reports, this young man was going to be the first in his family to go to college.

Each case should be judged on its own merits. Mandatory minimums prevent this from happening.

Mandatory minimum sentencing has done little to address the very real problem of drug abuse while also doing great damage by destroying so many lives, and most Americans now realize it.

I urge the attorney general to reconsider his recent action. But even more importantly, I urge my colleagues to consider bipartisan legislation to fix this problem in the law where it should be handled. Congress can end this injustice, and I look forward to leading this fight for justice.

Excerpt from:
Rand Paul: Sessions' sentencing plan would ruin lives - CNN

Paul: Another Senator Told Me He Was Surveilled by Obama Admin … – Fox News Insider

On "America's News HQ" this afternoon, Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) revealed that another senator confided in him that he was surveilled by the Obama administration.

Earlier this week, Paul said reporters have told him they have evidence he was a target of Obama administration spying.

This is the first time that Paul mentioned another senator is also concerned about the Obama administration's surveillance.

He said if this proves to be true, it's a much bigger story than any allegations about collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia during the presidential election.

"It's about your own government spying on the opposition party," Paul said. "That would be enormous if it's true."

Paul told Fox Business Networks Charles Payne on Wednesday that he's asked the White House and the House and Senate intelligence committees to investigate.

He said if the intelligence community is indeed being used for politics, it's a "very, very serious crime."

Paul added that the possible illegal use of intelligence community resources for political purposes raises chilling questions.

They have so much power to collect," Paul said. "I mean, they have the power to collect information, invade your privacy but also to destroy you."

Watch more above, and see the full Fox Business interview below.

McCain on Dems Crying Wolf: 'They Floated Impeachment on Election Night'

Conway on Anderson Cooper's Eye-Roll: I Face Sexism Often in TV Interviews

Acting FBI Director: 'Not Accurate' to Say Comey Lost Support of Rank and File

Enraged Dad to GOP Lawmaker: 'You've Been Single Greatest Threat to My Family'

More:
Paul: Another Senator Told Me He Was Surveilled by Obama Admin ... - Fox News Insider

Steve Kerbel: Libertarians must unite against our common enemy – Being Libertarian

It is interesting and fascinating, inspiring and frustrating to fight for the cause of liberty.

Once involved, it is very easy to let ones mind wander with regard to the barriers we have to our success in life, as well as the barriers to peace. This is a process in which we are all taught in our formative years that the enemies to these highly prized desires are people, groups, countries, political foes, religions, criminals, and other entities that are not supposedly under the control of the people.

The lessons that formed our thinking during the years that we receive formal education are ingrained in most of us, until we experience a key event that rattles our perceptions and we make a different recognition that the infrastructure that was created for the protection of the people is the very same infrastructure that violates peace, blocks our success, sustains violence, stifles our creativity, limits our freedoms, and destroys the spark in many of us to live our lives to the fullest, essentially standing firmly in the way of the pursuit of happiness and a peaceful world.

For many of us, this realization is a serious wake-up call which ignites a spark that inspires us to do something about this travesty. We are awake, but feel alone and frustrated because so many other people with whom we communicate have either not made this realization, or have already recognized the situation and find it insurmountable to change.

So, we fight the current and begin to fight the system. Some of us are so outraged that we make mistakes and the system destroys us. Some are more thoughtful with respect to their communications, plans and goals that they can help to raise awareness and grow the numbers of people that will subscribe to the fight for freedom. Others fight and become weary from a fight that on occasion feels futile.

Speaking from personal experience, I can say that I am prepared for the opposition from those who either strongly support government control, or who simply have not yet made the recognition as to the importance of casting these negative and controlling entities out of the way of self-actualization. What wearies me is the discouragement that I receive from people fighting the same fight as me, because my end goal does not match their end goal.

Having identified government as the culprit in so many violations against the happiness and peace of the individual, I too have been though a deep process of soul searching and analysis of this reality to which I was luxuriously oblivious only a decade ago. I have noticed myriad disastrous and destructive actions promulgated and acted upon by entities of government. It was easy for me to envision a society without government, a world without borders, and a truly free human society it was exhilarating!

Sadly, in my most rational analysis, this utopia cannot and will never exist in a grand scale on a planet in which the vast majority of the inhabitants are indoctrinated with political systems and religious beliefs to the contrary, as well as personal inflictions such as mistrust, fear and paranoia which are the reality of the landscape of life on Earth.

Where there is a void, there will always be a filler of that void. Where there is a weakness, there will be someone taking advantage of that weakness to satisfy whatever their need may be. Governments will always exist. Borders will always exist, unless there is only one government over the entire world, which is the complete antithesis to the growth and happiness of the human condition.

The internal arguments are powerful and with great fervor. Our struggle, the way I see it, is between reality and fantasy. The fantasy is that there will be a sustained period absent any government. The reality is that the entire planet would need to subscribe to this philosophy for it to be possible. While this would be beautiful, it will simply never happen.

If I am to inspire a positive change toward peace, happiness, growth, progress, freedom and individual prosperity, I must be rooted in the real world as it exists today; for if I am to be effective in this goal, I must address the actual challenges we face in order to begin the process of the reduction and removal of these barriers to human success that so many people do not see as barriers.

The road to a resurgence of liberty is a lonely road, and discouragement to the fighters from within our ranks makes this road even lonelier. I have made many friends in this movement, from all spectrums and all viewpoints, and each makes valid and pertinent points.

Today, I appeal to you all for unity within the liberty movement.

How can we be united when we have so many different visions of what the end goal should look like? The immediate answer is simple. We all have a common enemy. That enemy is an over-reaching, violent, oppressive, expensive and destructive government that will never be reduced if we are our own enemies, standing in the way of our progress.

Let us focus on the short term first. Stand together as one in the exposure of the reality of today, and the recognition that each elimination of a barrier to freedom and peace is a victory in its own merit. Let us work together toward each of these smaller goals and experience success together.

If we are to reach a point in which some of us are satisfied with the reductions and want to stop, while others want to keep going that is the time for the debate to begin. The longer we fight amongst ourselves, the longer the establishment will continue to grow itself unfettered. If there is no group that is organized enough to stand in the way of those currently in power, nothing will change and the opportunity to reverse their atrocities will no longer exist. They will simply remove our ability to institute change for the better.

I respectfully call on all of us in the liberty movement: Moderates, radicals, anarchists, and everyone in between to put your battles with each other on hold, so that we all can stand up together against the common enemy that we all have identified.

I look forward to the day when we can once again argue about the end goal because that would mean that we were successful; and the only way we can be successful is to use the strength that we all have as a unified power against tyranny.

Featured image: Libertarian Wing Media

This post was written by Steve Kerbel.

The views expressed here belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect our views and opinions.

Steve Kerbel is a businessman, author, and former Libertarian Party candidate for President of the United States.

Like Loading...

Follow this link:
Steve Kerbel: Libertarians must unite against our common enemy - Being Libertarian

Democrats, Libertarians Rally In Kalispell – MTPR

Democrats, Libertarians Rally In Kalispell

Democratic U.S. House candidate Rob Quist rallied supporters in Kalispell this weekend with the help of Senator Jon Tester. Libertarian candidate Mark Wicks was in Kalispell too, inviting his backers to show off their ugly trucks. Nicky Ouellet reports.

Nicky Ouellet: It was a big political weekend in the Flathead Valley with two of the three candidates vying for Montana's lone U.S. House seat hitting the area to rally voters. Libertarian candidate Mark Wicks made his first campaign trip to Whitefish.

On Saturday Wicks set up shop in a parking lot to shake hands and chat party ideology and cars with a dozen voters at an ugly truck competition. A playful reference to his campaign slogan to quote bring the work truck.

On Friday I caught up with him at a libertarian discussion night at Casey's bar.

Mark Wicks: So I like to say I'm the power pill of Montana politics. I'm the guy that if you send out there I've got more juice than the other two to get more voice for Montana. There's 435 representatives, and Montana only has one, and I can stand out where the other two just blend into the crowd and disappear.

NO: What what's it like running as a Libertarian in this special election, what's your experience been?

MW: Well people don't know I'm out there, and I think that's really sad because the people I've talked to are really happy to see a third party candidate that has common sense, that is honest. I'm pretty blunt spoken in my answers, and they like that. As a libertarian, being the only one in Washington, I bring a lot of clout from Montana into Washington because when they start asking for opinions on the six o'clock news they've got the Democrat opinion the Republican opinion and the libertarian opinion. Well guess what, the libertarian opinion is the Montana opinion. And so it brings a lot of power.

NO: What are the ideas that you see yourself bringing in to the special election?

MW: Well. As a Libertarian, I believe in liberty and freedom. I believe in less regulation and less government. Most people can get behind that.

NO: What issues do you see yourself as championing if you are elected and go to Washington?

MW: Oh, fiscal responsibility. As a farmer, we learn we have to stay within our budgets and we have to be very fiscally conservative just to get by.

NO: What other issues are really important to you?

MW: I would like to phase out the Department of Education and just block grant the monies to the states; get rid of that whole level bureaucracy and we'll have 50 experiments in education going on in the country. Each state would be able to do what works best for them.

NO: What about the health care bill that the House speaker supported?

MW: Well, I've I've never been in favor of government-run health care. I'm a repeal guy. I've never seen the government do any program that didn't get out of control, and I can't imagine how this one's going to be any different. To me, if they're serious about health care, you've got to get the cost down.

NO: How do you do that?

MW: Well part of it is just start with getting the liability costs down, get the insurance down. Another thing is to get the cost of the pharmaceuticals under control. So I advocate passing a law that the pharmaceutical companies can't sell drugs outside the U.S. for cheaper than what they're selling them inside for. You know, as far as health care, hospitals should have to list what they have, what they're going to charge you. It shouldn't be a dart board that you throw it at the dart board and see what the price is going to be.

NO: If you are not able to secure that seat, who would you want to see one Montanans sends to Washington?

MW: Oh. You know, that is a very hard question. And I'll just I'll just be honest like I always am. I feel like that if Mr. Gianforte gets in there we're not ever going to be able get him out unless he decides to leave himself. He has the money and the connections to be there forever. And Mr. Quist, honestly I think he's a one term guy. That if he's elected he can easily be defeated in the next election. That's just my feeling on it. I don't think I can get more honest than that.

NO: Even though the discussion night was not an official campaign stop, many of the 30 or so people there paid a visit to Wicks table for some one on one time with the candidate.

NO: Angie Killian is from Big Fork.

Angie Killian: And I'd really like to see a lot more attention paid to Mark Wicks because I feel the Libertarian position is far more, much more in common with general Montanans than either the religious Republican or the socialist Democrat.

NO: Killian says building the economy and lowering debt are her pet issues.

AK: We can't offer free education. We can offer free food and free housing and free medical care to the whole world. It just is impossible. We have to push a lot more personal responsibility.

NO: She says people are disappointed with the other guys in the race and Wicks supports a mix of Montana values that transcend party platforms.

AK: He thinks people should be able to do what they want to do as long as it's not hurting somebody else. And that is where I am and have been for most of my life.

NO: While Wicks' ugly truck campaign stops drew a dozen people, more than a hundred people spilled out of the room at the museum at Central School in Kalispell on Saturday to see Democratic candidate Rob Quist and Senator John Tester.

Quist hit on the issues that have become the hallmark of this campaign: Public Lands, public education, and his opposition to the health care bill recently passed by the house.

"The wrong people were at the table making the decisions," Quist told the crowd. "Were there any women represented in [inaudible]? Were there any people that was representing the veterans in this country? Anyone representing the seniors? And anyone representing Indian country? So once again it was the pharmaceutical companies and the insurance companies making all the health care decisions ...

NO: Quist also dedicated a fair amount of time to bashing Republican candidate Greg Gianforte.

"To me, he has a credibility issue. He's telling the people of Montana one thing, and he's telling the donors another thing," Quist said.

NO: People at Quist's event were vocal and responded to the barbs Quist threw. But at least one person in the room was tired of that type of negative rhetoric.

Stephanie Baca: I would like to see something pro and positive rather than 'I'm against this, against that, against this.'

NO: Retired Kalispell schoolteacher Stephanie Baca says her values align pretty well with Quist's. But before this rally she said she didn't feel like she knew him as a candidate.

SB: I wish I had heard more, but I know what his opponent is championing, and I can vote against that.

NO: Have you considered voting third party in this election?

SB: I did. And I listened to him, and when he started saying he frequented all the gun shows, that kinda lost me, to be honest.

NO: Baca adds she herself is a gun owner and supports the Second Amendment.

Quist was briefly joined on stage by Senator Jon Tester. Tester is the latest in a string of big names from Washington to visit the state. Vice president Mike Pence, Donald Trump Jr. and Secretary of the Interior Ryan Zinke all joined Greg Gianforte on the campaign trail in eastern Montana Friday. Tester emphasize the symbolic importance of the special election for Montana's House seat which hasn't been held by a Democrat in two decades.

"You want to talk about a shot fired across the bow. We elect Rob Quist to Congress and it will reverberate around this country, I'm telling you," Tester said.

NO: Montana's special election is May 25. Voters can request absentee ballots now.

Read more here:
Democrats, Libertarians Rally In Kalispell - MTPR